Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

This isn’t about agreeing with Bhumika or ABVP. It’s about knowing where political criticism ends and personal attacks begin. Calling a karyakarta a “cheerleader”, questioning who she walks with, and dragging her family into the conversation is not a political argument. And to everyone claiming she was being racist...

ojasbhandarii's profile picture

Ojas Bhandari

7,030 subscribers

16,550 görüntüleme • 13 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

16 Yorum

वाणिवाहक 📢🕊️ profil fotoğrafı
वाणिवाहक 📢🕊️13 gün önce

@BhoomikaSpeaks But she has the audacity to call a person, whether he takes bath or not just because he is a dalit.

Black Shirt Guy🥷 profil fotoğrafı
Black Shirt Guy🥷13 gün önce

@BhoomikaSpeaks He hates bjp and everything attached to it. And also he is misogynist. Remember he invited that cringistan on his live. Who abused young girls and threatened many to by rap e. He supported him. Anyone can check his YouTube for that.

Toni Kumar raj profil fotoğrafı
Toni Kumar raj13 gün önce

@BhoomikaSpeaks Khubsurat hona english bolne se tum intellectual nahi hoge keep your mind and thoughts in aandnav Goswami channel

Chaudhary profil fotoğrafı
Chaudhary13 gün önce

@BhoomikaSpeaks She is racist nd colorist 🤢

Mahesh Sharma profil fotoğrafı
Mahesh Sharma13 gün önce

@BhoomikaSpeaks Sahi kiya Nakul Dhull ne I stand with #NakhulDhull

anshh.xo profil fotoğrafı
anshh.xo13 gün önce

@BhoomikaSpeaks Lol getting offended by a cheerleader comment your bhoomika was saying awful things about abhijeet dipke throwing casteist slur a woman always know when to use their favourite card women card🤡

DJ Solanki profil fotoğrafı
DJ Solanki13 gün önce

@BhoomikaSpeaks Nakul dhull is urban Chapri 🤡

Akaydevil profil fotoğrafı
Akaydevil13 gün önce

@BhoomikaSpeaks Itna explain kiyu hi karna hai doodh dhai kha ke moti buddhi hogi hai iski.

Mandy profil fotoğrafı
Mandy13 gün önce

@BhoomikaSpeaks Swatantra Bharadwaj tumhara Rishtedar h kya. Tum dono ka Muh Same hai.. 😂😂😂

Dikshant Yadav profil fotoğrafı
Dikshant Yadav13 gün önce

@BhoomikaSpeaks Shows his upbringing

No more Chicha profil fotoğrafı
No more Chicha13 gün önce

@BhoomikaSpeaks I agree, they're totally wrong here judging a girl for these things or trying to demean with such gender biased statements. Haan uski personality, thinking bilkul Tatti hai us par bolo na

Kukku profil fotoğrafı
Kukku13 gün önce

@BhoomikaSpeaks If these sub humans are t dealt accordingly it’ll create bigger issues only

Rajat Taneja (Modi 's family) profil fotoğrafı
Rajat Taneja (Modi 's family)13 gün önce

@BhoomikaSpeaks Ojas ji this nakul dhul is the perfect example of how not to be with any civilized person Protein ke dhaabe khake body toh bana lete hai par dimag 0 a big 0

unknown person profil fotoğrafı
unknown person13 gün önce

@BhoomikaSpeaks Good. Expecting same video on modi for calling sonia gandhi bar dancer. Btw she was also women.

RandomRambles profil fotoğrafı
RandomRambles13 gün önce

@BhoomikaSpeaks You r wrong here, for taking this J0KER seriously nowdays is audience is dehati.

kashmira profil fotoğrafı
kashmira13 gün önce

@BhoomikaSpeaks Such bol diya toh rone lgi 😮‍💨😮‍💨

Benzer Videolar

Brandon Tatum defending his friendship with Candace by claiming you can be friends with someone even though you disagree on a certain topic. It’s true—you can be friends with someone you disagree with. But this isn’t like disagreeing about who to vote for or the tax rate. It’s not even just disagreeing on who murdered Charlie Kirk. What Candace is doing and the way she’s doing it exposes a deep-seated character issue, and I wouldn’t want that person as my friend. I get it’s tough when you go way back, though. That said, sometimes you’ve got to just let them go and pray for them. It’s not just a matter of a disagreement in perception; Candace is a bad person. Even if she truly believed there was more to the story about what happened to Charlie Kirk, she could’ve gone about it a completely different way, and she chose to not. And she wakes up everyday and continues to choose to not.
2:22

Brandon Tatum defending his friendship with Candace by claiming you can be friends with someone even though you disagree on a certain topic. It’s true—you can be friends with someone you disagree with. But this isn’t like disagreeing about who to vote for or the tax rate. It’s not even just disagreeing on who murdered Charlie Kirk. What Candace is doing and the way she’s doing it exposes a deep-seated character issue, and I wouldn’t want that person as my friend. I get it’s tough when you go way back, though. That said, sometimes you’ve got to just let them go and pray for them. It’s not just a matter of a disagreement in perception; Candace is a bad person. Even if she truly believed there was more to the story about what happened to Charlie Kirk, she could’ve gone about it a completely different way, and she chose to not. And she wakes up everyday and continues to choose to not.

Natalie Jean Beisner

15,633 görüntüleme • 22 gün önce

Cockroach Janta Party founder Abhijeet Dipke has now brought some Muslims to his protest and is praising them while talking about secularism. Abhijeet Dipke was claiming that this protest was against the paper leak and that it was a students' protest. Then why are Muslims being turned into heroes at this protest? What do Muslims have to do with a protest against a paper leak?
0:57

Cockroach Janta Party founder Abhijeet Dipke has now brought some Muslims to his protest and is praising them while talking about secularism. Abhijeet Dipke was claiming that this protest was against the paper leak and that it was a students' protest. Then why are Muslims being turned into heroes at this protest? What do Muslims have to do with a protest against a paper leak?

Saffron Chargers

43,158 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

If Meredith Marks had a conversation with Trump she would tell him to stop the grifting and to leave. Meredith was asked some questions and if she supports it she takes a bump of caviar but if she doesn’t support it she dumps it. She takes a bump for people calling out politicians who don’t support LGBTQ+ rights and the community. Paying 80k for a photo with Trump? Meredith is dumping it. Then she was asked about performers getting political at their shows, like Macklemore even though it could hurt their career… Meredith gives that a mini bump… 🤨 She thinks performers getting political is a personal decision but she would not be expressing political views at something that was meant to be entertainment because it’s not her thing but “to each their own.” 😐 #RHOSLC
2:35

If Meredith Marks had a conversation with Trump she would tell him to stop the grifting and to leave. Meredith was asked some questions and if she supports it she takes a bump of caviar but if she doesn’t support it she dumps it. She takes a bump for people calling out politicians who don’t support LGBTQ+ rights and the community. Paying 80k for a photo with Trump? Meredith is dumping it. Then she was asked about performers getting political at their shows, like Macklemore even though it could hurt their career… Meredith gives that a mini bump… 🤨 She thinks performers getting political is a personal decision but she would not be expressing political views at something that was meant to be entertainment because it’s not her thing but “to each their own.” 😐 #RHOSLC

Bye Wig Hello Drama

24,074 görüntüleme • 15 gün önce

This is a perfect example of phony fake 🐂💩. “My husband is a fox” WHO SAYS THAT? I haven’t heard someone called a fox since watching movies from the 70s. And “that man loves me so much”-she’s not calling him Harry, but “that man” and it’s all about her. Not the family, not what kind of a person he is. #MeghanMarkle is all about HER and what can be done for HER and what she gets out of it. Transactional relationships 100%. #harryandmeghan
1:15

This is a perfect example of phony fake 🐂💩. “My husband is a fox” WHO SAYS THAT? I haven’t heard someone called a fox since watching movies from the 70s. And “that man loves me so much”-she’s not calling him Harry, but “that man” and it’s all about her. Not the family, not what kind of a person he is. #MeghanMarkle is all about HER and what can be done for HER and what she gets out of it. Transactional relationships 100%. #harryandmeghan

Princess CarParkle 👑

433,832 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Watch this and you realise the bus was never the flex. Oprah walks on expecting chrome and costume. Dolly shows her a wig closet, a kitchen she actually cooks in and a bed she works from because this is where the miles happen. She would not fly. So she built a house that moved and refused to treat a hotel like home. The clip is not about money. It is about a woman from a one room cabin deciding the road still had to feel like hers.
3:54

Watch this and you realise the bus was never the flex. Oprah walks on expecting chrome and costume. Dolly shows her a wig closet, a kitchen she actually cooks in and a bed she works from because this is where the miles happen. She would not fly. So she built a house that moved and refused to treat a hotel like home. The clip is not about money. It is about a woman from a one room cabin deciding the road still had to feel like hers.

Dope thrills

342,172 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Fred Okango: ODM is not a protest movement or club. It is a political party that is constitutionally mandated to obtain political power through constitutional means. The contest within ODM should be about the people and not about who would say what Raila said #CitizenDayBreak
3:26

Fred Okango: ODM is not a protest movement or club. It is a political party that is constitutionally mandated to obtain political power through constitutional means. The contest within ODM should be about the people and not about who would say what Raila said #CitizenDayBreak

Citizen TV Kenya

10,959 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

This was not abstract. It was not theoretical. Real animals were destroyed. Real people lost livelihoods they spent years building. Turning that into a joke at a formal event was a choice. The Ostrich Farm Mattered Calling it a roast does not excuse it. Leadership is not about landing laughs in a room full of power. It is about judgment, empathy, and understanding the weight of decisions. The loss was real. The joke made it symbolic.l…And what it symbolized was distance from consequences. That is not humor. That is a failure of leadership.
1:40

This was not abstract. It was not theoretical. Real animals were destroyed. Real people lost livelihoods they spent years building. Turning that into a joke at a formal event was a choice. The Ostrich Farm Mattered Calling it a roast does not excuse it. Leadership is not about landing laughs in a room full of power. It is about judgment, empathy, and understanding the weight of decisions. The loss was real. The joke made it symbolic.l…And what it symbolized was distance from consequences. That is not humor. That is a failure of leadership.

Unfiltered With Kels

17,763 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

🚨 THIS IS ABOUT HENRY NOWAK 🚨 Kemi has made the point perfectly. This is not about Black lives, White lives, or scoring political points. Every life matters. While Nigel Farage is trying to turn this tragedy into a political argument and make himself the centre of attention, the focus should remain where it belongs — on Henry Nowak, and his family. Not everything has to be about politics. Sometimes it’s about basic humanity. Henry Nowak deserves better than to become a political football. 🇬🇧
4:25

🚨 THIS IS ABOUT HENRY NOWAK 🚨 Kemi has made the point perfectly. This is not about Black lives, White lives, or scoring political points. Every life matters. While Nigel Farage is trying to turn this tragedy into a political argument and make himself the centre of attention, the focus should remain where it belongs — on Henry Nowak, and his family. Not everything has to be about politics. Sometimes it’s about basic humanity. Henry Nowak deserves better than to become a political football. 🇬🇧

Sly U

25,398 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

If this is not racist, I do not know what is some gypsies and travellers young lads and girls going into Manchester today? Not even allowed off the train you think this was a terrorist or a football match? This has to stop #2024 #Racist #Racist and #Racist for sum kids #WOW
0:22

If this is not racist, I do not know what is some gypsies and travellers young lads and girls going into Manchester today? Not even allowed off the train you think this was a terrorist or a football match? This has to stop #2024 #Racist #Racist and #Racist for sum kids #WOW

Isaac warrior lowe

44,178 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

A man at the park starts filming a woman and her dog from across the field, then walks over and confronts her, claiming the dog is scaring his kids. She says the dog hasn’t done anything and he’s just looking for a problem to start. Filming someone before you’ve even said a word to them isn’t documentation - it’s provocation. If the dog was actually a threat, the conversation starts with “hey, can you step back,” not a camera pointed at a stranger from fifty feet away. Most park conflicts like this aren’t really about the dog. They’re about someone deciding they’re owed control over a public space that belongs to everyone equally. What would you have done in her position?
0:26

A man at the park starts filming a woman and her dog from across the field, then walks over and confronts her, claiming the dog is scaring his kids. She says the dog hasn’t done anything and he’s just looking for a problem to start. Filming someone before you’ve even said a word to them isn’t documentation - it’s provocation. If the dog was actually a threat, the conversation starts with “hey, can you step back,” not a camera pointed at a stranger from fifty feet away. Most park conflicts like this aren’t really about the dog. They’re about someone deciding they’re owed control over a public space that belongs to everyone equally. What would you have done in her position?

Tony Lane 🇺🇸

18,750 görüntüleme • 14 gün önce

There is a special kind of mental illness in dragging Modi ji’s deceased mother into protests and political attacks when she had absolutely nothing to do with politics. She was an ordinary mother who lived her life away from power, office, elections and political battles. She never sought a political position, never campaigned for power and never made herself a part of public life. Dragging a dead mother who was never involved in politics into your political hatred is not dissent. It is cruelty, desperation and a complete collapse of basic decency. You are not hurting Modi ji’s politics by insulting his mother. You are revealing your own character. Your moral Bankruptcy
1:26

There is a special kind of mental illness in dragging Modi ji’s deceased mother into protests and political attacks when she had absolutely nothing to do with politics. She was an ordinary mother who lived her life away from power, office, elections and political battles. She never sought a political position, never campaigned for power and never made herself a part of public life. Dragging a dead mother who was never involved in politics into your political hatred is not dissent. It is cruelty, desperation and a complete collapse of basic decency. You are not hurting Modi ji’s politics by insulting his mother. You are revealing your own character. Your moral Bankruptcy

Punita Toraskar

49,497 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Adriana Chechik reveals about the first fan she hooked up with and what her boundaries were around it. She explained that the first fan experience happened at a raves, where she came up with a "wear Waldo" style game. The idea was that the first fan to find her would get a bl0wj0b. She recalled being found by a female fan, who told her that her boyfriend was there and was a huge fan of hers. “And I think I was running around the raves like two hours later she shows up and she’s like this is my boyfriend like you’ve gotta svck his d1ck”
1:35

Sensitive content

Adriana Chechik reveals about the first fan she hooked up with and what her boundaries were around it. She explained that the first fan experience happened at a raves, where she came up with a "wear Waldo" style game. The idea was that the first fan to find her would get a bl0wj0b. She recalled being found by a female fan, who told her that her boyfriend was there and was a huge fan of hers. “And I think I was running around the raves like two hours later she shows up and she’s like this is my boyfriend like you’ve gotta svck his d1ck”

CLPX

83,192 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

A Palestinian woman was sold by her family into a forced marriage with a relative in Saudi Arabia. She managed to escape to Canada, left Islam, and converted to Christianity. Since then, she has been outspoken against what she describes as the genocidal ideology within Palestinian society, one that seeks to destroy Israel and slaughter Jews as human sacrifices for Allah. This is not theoretical for her. She lived inside the system and saw it from within. Her story is a painful reminder that the hatred toward Jews is not just political, it is deeply rooted in ideology and culture.
1:20

A Palestinian woman was sold by her family into a forced marriage with a relative in Saudi Arabia. She managed to escape to Canada, left Islam, and converted to Christianity. Since then, she has been outspoken against what she describes as the genocidal ideology within Palestinian society, one that seeks to destroy Israel and slaughter Jews as human sacrifices for Allah. This is not theoretical for her. She lived inside the system and saw it from within. Her story is a painful reminder that the hatred toward Jews is not just political, it is deeply rooted in ideology and culture.

Yossi BenYakar

83,276 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Meghan Markle infamous curtsy reenactment in the Netflix series was not a quirky anecdote. It was a glaring window into Meghan’s character, & it spectacularly backfired. By turning a simple gesture of respect into an over the top, sarcastic performance, complete with the mocking “Pleasure to meet you, Your Majesty,” she did not merely poke fun at royal protocol. She openly disrespected her husband’s grandmother and the cultural traditions she was marrying into. You do not have to adore the monarchy to show basic decency. Mocking it on a global stage is not empowerment. It is pettiness wrapped in self righteousness. It is contempt. What makes it worse is the attempt to sell this as innocence. She was not a sheltered teenager from another planet. She was a middle aged actress who had dated a prince, lived in the UK, and actively sought proximity to that world. She knew she was joining one of the most scrutinised families on earth. She could have asked. She could have researched. She could have practised quietly. Instead, she weaponised the moment years later. And Harry fares no better in this story. A man raised in palaces mentions curtsying in the car, yet apparently never bothers to explain what actually matters. Then he sits back while his wife mocks the moment on camera. Pretending she thought curtsying was some medieval parody is performative ignorance. That is not naïveté. It is affectation. Harry was complicit in the shade throwing, prioritising their grievance narrative over basic respect for his own family. What Meghan failed to understand is that respecting another culture does not diminish you. It elevates you. Courtesy is not submission. Learning customs is not erasure. When you marry into another family, another country, another culture, the basic adult response is to observe, learn, and show respect. Millions of people move across cultures every day. They learn greetings, gestures, and etiquette not because they are forced to, but because respect is universal. You honour others and in doing so you show character. Meghan chose the opposite. She treated unfamiliarity as something to sneer at, as if curiosity and humility were beneath her. The late Queen would not have cared about a perfect curtsy during their first meeting. She met presidents, dictators, pop stars, and children. She was pragmatic, warm, and famously forgiving of protocol mishaps. A genuine smile and a simple “Nice to meet you” would have been more than enough. Instead, Meghan chose theatrical disdain, reducing a lifetime of duty and service into a punchline for Netflix dollars. It was not funny. It was mean spirited, and it revealed someone who views other people’s customs as beneath her. That exaggerated curtsy was not for the Queen. It was for the audience Meghan always imagines watching her. The moment was not lived. It was stored, packaged, and later monetised. That is the pattern. Nothing is private. Everything is content. Every interaction is reduced to a punchline that flatters her and diminishes others. This moment was never really about a curtsy. It was about attitude. A woman secure in herself does not need to belittle someone else’s traditions to feel superior. She does not turn cultural difference into comedy and later into grievance. She adapts. She listens. She observes. That is how you gain respect without asking for it. If anything, that exaggerated curtsy made her look small, not modern. True confidence does not perform contempt. It practises respect quietly, even when the cameras are off. She did not merely reveal herself. She ruined herself, slowly and publicly, through moments like this. She did not need the press to torpedo her image. Her own words and performances did that for her. Respect is not about agreement. It is about not being gratuitously rude. Meghan’s mockery achieved the opposite. It made her appear insecure, arrogant, and unwilling to bridge any gap.
0:21

Meghan Markle infamous curtsy reenactment in the Netflix series was not a quirky anecdote. It was a glaring window into Meghan’s character, & it spectacularly backfired. By turning a simple gesture of respect into an over the top, sarcastic performance, complete with the mocking “Pleasure to meet you, Your Majesty,” she did not merely poke fun at royal protocol. She openly disrespected her husband’s grandmother and the cultural traditions she was marrying into. You do not have to adore the monarchy to show basic decency. Mocking it on a global stage is not empowerment. It is pettiness wrapped in self righteousness. It is contempt. What makes it worse is the attempt to sell this as innocence. She was not a sheltered teenager from another planet. She was a middle aged actress who had dated a prince, lived in the UK, and actively sought proximity to that world. She knew she was joining one of the most scrutinised families on earth. She could have asked. She could have researched. She could have practised quietly. Instead, she weaponised the moment years later. And Harry fares no better in this story. A man raised in palaces mentions curtsying in the car, yet apparently never bothers to explain what actually matters. Then he sits back while his wife mocks the moment on camera. Pretending she thought curtsying was some medieval parody is performative ignorance. That is not naïveté. It is affectation. Harry was complicit in the shade throwing, prioritising their grievance narrative over basic respect for his own family. What Meghan failed to understand is that respecting another culture does not diminish you. It elevates you. Courtesy is not submission. Learning customs is not erasure. When you marry into another family, another country, another culture, the basic adult response is to observe, learn, and show respect. Millions of people move across cultures every day. They learn greetings, gestures, and etiquette not because they are forced to, but because respect is universal. You honour others and in doing so you show character. Meghan chose the opposite. She treated unfamiliarity as something to sneer at, as if curiosity and humility were beneath her. The late Queen would not have cared about a perfect curtsy during their first meeting. She met presidents, dictators, pop stars, and children. She was pragmatic, warm, and famously forgiving of protocol mishaps. A genuine smile and a simple “Nice to meet you” would have been more than enough. Instead, Meghan chose theatrical disdain, reducing a lifetime of duty and service into a punchline for Netflix dollars. It was not funny. It was mean spirited, and it revealed someone who views other people’s customs as beneath her. That exaggerated curtsy was not for the Queen. It was for the audience Meghan always imagines watching her. The moment was not lived. It was stored, packaged, and later monetised. That is the pattern. Nothing is private. Everything is content. Every interaction is reduced to a punchline that flatters her and diminishes others. This moment was never really about a curtsy. It was about attitude. A woman secure in herself does not need to belittle someone else’s traditions to feel superior. She does not turn cultural difference into comedy and later into grievance. She adapts. She listens. She observes. That is how you gain respect without asking for it. If anything, that exaggerated curtsy made her look small, not modern. True confidence does not perform contempt. It practises respect quietly, even when the cameras are off. She did not merely reveal herself. She ruined herself, slowly and publicly, through moments like this. She did not need the press to torpedo her image. Her own words and performances did that for her. Respect is not about agreement. It is about not being gratuitously rude. Meghan’s mockery achieved the opposite. It made her appear insecure, arrogant, and unwilling to bridge any gap.

Queen Esther

185,709 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Everything is projection with Candace Owens. Like when she made a big deal about Charlie and Erika Kirk's wedding photo being moved - which was done so their daughter could access it - Candace however said Erika should've lied and "blamed the housekeeper, I'M GOING TO FIRE THE HOUSEKEEPER. That's what I would've done." Because that is what she does. Just lies to push whatever narrative is most advantageous to her. There's not a single honest bone in Candace's body.
0:35

Everything is projection with Candace Owens. Like when she made a big deal about Charlie and Erika Kirk's wedding photo being moved - which was done so their daughter could access it - Candace however said Erika should've lied and "blamed the housekeeper, I'M GOING TO FIRE THE HOUSEKEEPER. That's what I would've done." Because that is what she does. Just lies to push whatever narrative is most advantageous to her. There's not a single honest bone in Candace's body.

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

52,890 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

She is the same girl who got a like from Virat Kohli on her instagram - do not make her part of your troll and she is not an adult creator whoever is setting narrative with without knowing anything should stop - She is a very Kind hearted and well behaved girl
0:41

She is the same girl who got a like from Virat Kohli on her instagram - do not make her part of your troll and she is not an adult creator whoever is setting narrative with without knowing anything should stop - She is a very Kind hearted and well behaved girl

Gagan Choudhary

245,865 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Lolita is a story about a man who walked into a house that was already a little lonely, and a girl who had no say in who got a key. Charlotte wants to be chosen. That part is human. She is a widow, she is proud, she is hungry for a life that is not only bills and a daughter who is growing away from her. Humbert sees that hunger and uses it. He does not fall into the family. He studies it. The mother is the door. The child is the room. Dolores is not the author of what happens to her. That is the whole point, and it is the part adaptations keep almost dropping. She is a kid in a small world …camps, cars, motels, a mother who wants a wedding more than she wants to look again at the man she let in. When Charlotte is gone, there is no adult left whose job is her. There is only him, and the road, and the lie that this is a romance because he is the one talking. Why did the adult who was meant to protect the child,preyed on her? He was supposed to be a wall not an opening. In the book,the girl was only 12yrs old.
2:06

Lolita is a story about a man who walked into a house that was already a little lonely, and a girl who had no say in who got a key. Charlotte wants to be chosen. That part is human. She is a widow, she is proud, she is hungry for a life that is not only bills and a daughter who is growing away from her. Humbert sees that hunger and uses it. He does not fall into the family. He studies it. The mother is the door. The child is the room. Dolores is not the author of what happens to her. That is the whole point, and it is the part adaptations keep almost dropping. She is a kid in a small world …camps, cars, motels, a mother who wants a wedding more than she wants to look again at the man she let in. When Charlotte is gone, there is no adult left whose job is her. There is only him, and the road, and the lie that this is a romance because he is the one talking. Why did the adult who was meant to protect the child,preyed on her? He was supposed to be a wall not an opening. In the book,the girl was only 12yrs old.

LOLO

3,193,418 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce