Video yükleniyor...
Video Yüklenemedi
This isn't just a rhetorical difference either. There's a clear difference between the type of politics which came with Malcolm X's Pan-Africanism versus the type of politics with Tariq promotes. This is why I argue that ADOS and FBA represent regressions in Black politics.
16,550 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce •via X (Twitter)
9 Yorum

The comments claim Malcolm X is obsolete. The FBA org is diametrically opposed to the history of Black Nationalist Traditions & The Academic legacy of those who came out of the Harlem Renaissance. This has been superceded by false narratives & appropriation of red native culture.

He also said…& this was all pre-internet and the ability of hindsight…

Stop Malcolm wasn't here to see the all the Disrespectful things Africans and Caribbeans have done towards our progress in America

Malcolm was the one who spoke about house Negroes, so he was already aware of Black traitors and sellouts.

He not even alive to see the bullshit yall be on, yall would call him a terroist and all type of uncle toms if he turned and used that unity on yall like he should’ve

There is only ONE organization that I acknowledge that’s out here fighting for reparations out here is: NOT FBA or ADOS.

It’s okay to disagree with MX. Im American

The point is regression. Black American conservatives have always wanted regression from outside groups that do not have our interest in mind. Malcolm is evidence that we tried and you simply were not interested. African tribalism is a destructive force. We have to move away from it and you all.

African governments were very interested actually, which is why the US govt was working to undermine the Pan-African movement in the US and in Africa. You've moved away from it for 60 years now and haven't accomplished very much.
