正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

🚨 THIS ISN’T “SHRINKFLATION” - IT’S ROBBING AMERICANS IN PLAIN SIGHT Two sealed bags. Two brands. Same scam. A brand new Ruffles bag opened on camera - FIVE chips at the bottom. A sealed Miss Vickie's bag from Jersey Mike’s - counted on camera - SIX CHIPS. THAT’S IT.... show more

HustleBitch

236,950 subscribers

31,734 次观看 • 8 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治健康养生财经

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🚨 LEAKED FOOTAGE FROM O’HARE AIRPORT BAG ROOM — THIS IS WHAT THEY DO TO YOUR LUGGAGE WHEN YOU’RE NOT LOOKING Suitcases getting LAUNCHED full force like garbage. No hesitation. No care. Just straight impact. This is the same bag you trust with everything you packed… getting thrown like this. And airlines still charge you extra for it. This isn’t a mistake. It’s routine. So when your bag shows up cracked open, items missing, or completely destroyed… was it ever “lost”… or just handled like this the entire time? How many times has YOUR bag been treated like this?

🚨 LEAKED FOOTAGE FROM O’HARE AIRPORT BAG ROOM — THIS IS WHAT THEY DO TO YOUR LUGGAGE WHEN YOU’RE NOT LOOKING Suitcases getting LAUNCHED full force like garbage. No hesitation. No care. Just straight impact. This is the same bag you trust with everything you packed… getting thrown like this. And airlines still charge you extra for it. This isn’t a mistake. It’s routine. So when your bag shows up cracked open, items missing, or completely destroyed… was it ever “lost”… or just handled like this the entire time? How many times has YOUR bag been treated like this?

HustleBitch

2,223,452 次观看 • 5 个月前

Last time the President said “no changes, all okay.” Next day, the Finance Minister jacked up oil prices. Yesterday, the Finance Minister said “no plans to increase.” Today, the President rightly said prices will change as needed. This isn’t two different sides. This is the same government contradicting itself within hours. If your own President and Finance Minister can’t stay on the same page for even a day, that’s not governance, that’s dysfunction. Please get it together! Because when leadership speaks in contradictions, markets panic, people lose trust, and the country pays the price.

Last time the President said “no changes, all okay.” Next day, the Finance Minister jacked up oil prices. Yesterday, the Finance Minister said “no plans to increase.” Today, the President rightly said prices will change as needed. This isn’t two different sides. This is the same government contradicting itself within hours. If your own President and Finance Minister can’t stay on the same page for even a day, that’s not governance, that’s dysfunction. Please get it together! Because when leadership speaks in contradictions, markets panic, people lose trust, and the country pays the price.

Midhuam Saud(米渡）🇲🇻

31,780 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨 CHICK-FIL-A IS QUIETLY ADDING A “PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT FEE” TO RECEIPTS - HOPING YOU WON’T NOTICE Look closely at this receipt. Right there at the bottom: “Public Improvement Fee - $2.00.” Not a tax. Not a tip. Not explained anywhere on the receipt. The woman filming says it out loud: What is this - and why am I paying it? No sign at the counter. No warning at checkout. No explanation of what’s being “improved” or who decided customers should pay for it. Just a quiet add-on, banking on the fact that most people won’t notice, won’t question it, or won’t want to argue over two dollars in a drive thru line. So prices aren’t just going up anymore. They’re being padded with vague fees after the fact. How many times have you already paid this without realizing it?

🚨 CHICK-FIL-A IS QUIETLY ADDING A “PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT FEE” TO RECEIPTS - HOPING YOU WON’T NOTICE Look closely at this receipt. Right there at the bottom: “Public Improvement Fee - $2.00.” Not a tax. Not a tip. Not explained anywhere on the receipt. The woman filming says it out loud: What is this - and why am I paying it? No sign at the counter. No warning at checkout. No explanation of what’s being “improved” or who decided customers should pay for it. Just a quiet add-on, banking on the fact that most people won’t notice, won’t question it, or won’t want to argue over two dollars in a drive thru line. So prices aren’t just going up anymore. They’re being padded with vague fees after the fact. How many times have you already paid this without realizing it?

HustleBitch

721,193 次观看 • 7 个月前

🇮🇷| Two videos from the same location but different atmosphere. One widely circulated video, originally posted by an account based in France, shows a rather blurry scene with monarchist slogans, with a building burning in the distance. Another video from the exact same location, filmed slightly farther back than the first, shows no fire at the building, and the chants are different; people can be heard chanting “Iran, Iran, Iran.” People are not marching, they are standing still, so it must be from the same timeline also. The first video is therefore blurred on purpose to hide the fact that it was probably altered.

🇮🇷| Two videos from the same location but different atmosphere. One widely circulated video, originally posted by an account based in France, shows a rather blurry scene with monarchist slogans, with a building burning in the distance. Another video from the exact same location, filmed slightly farther back than the first, shows no fire at the building, and the chants are different; people can be heard chanting “Iran, Iran, Iran.” People are not marching, they are standing still, so it must be from the same timeline also. The first video is therefore blurred on purpose to hide the fact that it was probably altered.

Arya - آریا

257,873 次观看 • 8 个月前

So I’ve had a minute to think about this ego driven vanity clip #MeghanMarkle dropped for #asever and I have questions. •this seems like a rebrand. Why are there no new products? These are the same products since launch. Same packaging. She has not added anything new besides limited edition crap. •why does it feel like a low rent fashion reel? She wears no less than 8 outfits worth over $100,000, never MIND the jewelry. What is “as ever” about this? She picks up a few jars of as ever spread-BFD, it could be any brand. There’s nothing about this that makes you connect to the brand. •the acting is horrid. She looks so pretentious and awkward-she REALLY should have hired another person to be the face of the brand but we all know her ego would have never allowed that. Markle was a bad actor then and is still a bad actor. •is she selling clothing? Jewelry? It’s just so disjointed and Markle heavy that the focus is on her, not the brand. Brands do rebrands when they want to target a new audience, launch new product, recover from a PR crisis, or to stay fresh and relevant. This is not accomplishing those things-it’s weird and just an excuse for Markle to be on camera in a bunch of designer clothes she can now write off as a business expenses. I see you, girl. #MeghanIsTheProblem #MeghanMarkleIsAGrifter

Princess CarParkle 👑

71,513 次观看 • 3 个月前

Most people don’t realize “Harper Valley PTA” was a debut single. It turned Jeannie C. Riley into a star in 1968, selling over 6 million copies. Even wilder, it made her the first woman to take the same song to No. 1 on both the pop and country charts (just not at the same time). That crossover wouldn’t happen again until Dolly Parton’s “9 to 5” more than a decade later. Not bad for a song that stirred up a little PTA trouble.

Most people don’t realize “Harper Valley PTA” was a debut single. It turned Jeannie C. Riley into a star in 1968, selling over 6 million copies. Even wilder, it made her the first woman to take the same song to No. 1 on both the pop and country charts (just not at the same time). That crossover wouldn’t happen again until Dolly Parton’s “9 to 5” more than a decade later. Not bad for a song that stirred up a little PTA trouble.

🇺🇸Hot Pepper

37,329 次观看 • 8 个月前

Americans have started to notice that companies sell the exact same products to men as they do women, but the women’s version cost more This is called “Pinkflation” or the “Pink Tax” This is a real and well documented fact Example Tweezers: Brands like Revlon, Tweezerman and more frequently sell basically identical stainless steel tweezers with only cosmetic differences like color and packaging. They markup the women’s line Women’s tweezers can be $18+ while men’s might be $12, but they’re the same It’s not just tweezers Studies from NYC Consumer Affairs and more have found women pay 13%+ more on average for similar personal care items like razors, deodorant, shampoo, and grooming tools Some women’s products have slight design tweaks but many don’t, many just change the color It’s just another corporate scam in America that’s somehow legal

Americans have started to notice that companies sell the exact same products to men as they do women, but the women’s version cost more This is called “Pinkflation” or the “Pink Tax” This is a real and well documented fact Example Tweezers: Brands like Revlon, Tweezerman and more frequently sell basically identical stainless steel tweezers with only cosmetic differences like color and packaging. They markup the women’s line Women’s tweezers can be $18+ while men’s might be $12, but they’re the same It’s not just tweezers Studies from NYC Consumer Affairs and more have found women pay 13%+ more on average for similar personal care items like razors, deodorant, shampoo, and grooming tools Some women’s products have slight design tweaks but many don’t, many just change the color It’s just another corporate scam in America that’s somehow legal

Wall Street Apes

76,460 次观看 • 3 个月前

They’re still going strong. Black outs, no internet, shot at and killed. The people, seemingly indefatigable and unstoppable, are totally clear about what they want. They have one sole aim - with or without foreign intervention - of ending this regime for good. Some outside the country, sitting comfortably at home, are telling us online what they think the people of Iran want and need. And I can tell you it is totally at odds with the wishes of the people. As an Iranian, I am intensely invested in this unfolding story of incredible heroism. For 12 days straight I’m seeing the same thing on the streets. They’re not calling for the Communists. They’re not calling for the MEK. They’re not even calling to be saved. They’re chanting “Pahlavi bar migardeh” (Pahlavi will return). It’s not controversial. It’s undeniable. When they say “listen to the people”, this is it. #IranianRevolution2026

They’re still going strong. Black outs, no internet, shot at and killed. The people, seemingly indefatigable and unstoppable, are totally clear about what they want. They have one sole aim - with or without foreign intervention - of ending this regime for good. Some outside the country, sitting comfortably at home, are telling us online what they think the people of Iran want and need. And I can tell you it is totally at odds with the wishes of the people. As an Iranian, I am intensely invested in this unfolding story of incredible heroism. For 12 days straight I’m seeing the same thing on the streets. They’re not calling for the Communists. They’re not calling for the MEK. They’re not even calling to be saved. They’re chanting “Pahlavi bar migardeh” (Pahlavi will return). It’s not controversial. It’s undeniable. When they say “listen to the people”, this is it. #IranianRevolution2026

Omid Djalili

307,825 次观看 • 8 个月前

🚨 THE U.S. IS BLOCKING $10,000 TRUCKS AND $8,000 SELF-DRIVING CARS FROM AMERICANS - AND NOBODY WILL SAY WHY A guy just exposed something wild on camera: Toyota sells brand-new $10,000 trucks in countries all over the world… except the United States. China sells $8,000 BYD cars that literally drive themselves. But Americans? We’re told $35k–$45k is “normal,” and if we can’t afford it, that’s just “the market.” Meanwhile, the same companies happily sell ultra-cheap vehicles everywhere except here while Americans drown in car loans, dealership markups, and insurance spikes. So what’s the real reason the U.S. is the only place where cheap, basic cars magically don’t exist? Safety? Regulation? Or something nobody wants to say out loud? If other countries get $10k trucks and $8k self-driving cars… why are Americans the only ones being forced to pay luxury prices for basic transportation?

HustleBitch

763,244 次观看 • 9 个月前

🚨 BLACK FRIDAY IS OFFICIALLY A SCAM - AND SAM’S CLUB JUST GOT CAUGHT RED-HANDED A shopper filmed a “Black Friday deal” for $15.98… Then looked behind the sign and found the regular price was LOWER - $14.98. "They are SCAMMING us guys! I can't believe it. " They didn’t discount it. They raised the price then slapped a “Black Friday” sticker on it. This isn’t a sale. This is manufactured savings - the kind that only works if nobody checks the shelf behind it. People in the comments say this SAME item was $8.99 over the summer. Now stores are hiking prices because it’s Black Friday and still calling it a deal. Everyone’s starting to notice the same thing at different stores. It’s not one mistake - it’s a pattern. Are ANY Black Friday deals real anymore, or are stores just betting that we won’t double check the price tag?

🚨 BLACK FRIDAY IS OFFICIALLY A SCAM - AND SAM’S CLUB JUST GOT CAUGHT RED-HANDED A shopper filmed a “Black Friday deal” for $15.98… Then looked behind the sign and found the regular price was LOWER - $14.98. "They are SCAMMING us guys! I can't believe it. " They didn’t discount it. They raised the price then slapped a “Black Friday” sticker on it. This isn’t a sale. This is manufactured savings - the kind that only works if nobody checks the shelf behind it. People in the comments say this SAME item was $8.99 over the summer. Now stores are hiking prices because it’s Black Friday and still calling it a deal. Everyone’s starting to notice the same thing at different stores. It’s not one mistake - it’s a pattern. Are ANY Black Friday deals real anymore, or are stores just betting that we won’t double check the price tag?

HustleBitch

839,784 次观看 • 9 个月前

Satya Nadella: Microsoft’s latest Wisconsin AI data center keeps yearly water consumption no higher than that of 1 local restaurant. "The cooling loop is filled once and the data centre can operate effectively with zero water consumption. Daily water usage across a year is roughly equivalent to what a single restaurant would use" The mechanism is mainly about replacing evaporative cooling with closed-loop direct-to-chip liquid cooling, so water moves like coolant inside a sealed machine rather than being boiled off into the air. Hot GB200-class AI racks produce too much heat for normal air cooling, so cold liquid is pushed through pipes into the servers and across metal cold plates touching the hottest chips. The liquid enters the rack cool, absorbs heat from the chips through cold plates, then exits the rack at a higher temperature and carries that heat through pipes to a huge cooling system outside the compute floor. Microsoft says Fairwater sends that hot water to cooling “fins” beside the datacenter, where 172 20-foot fans blow air across the fins and dump the heat into the outside air. The important detail is that the air cools the water through metal surfaces, so the water does not need to evaporate the way many older datacenters use cooling towers. The cooled liquid then returns to the servers, repeats the loop, and keeps absorbing heat from the chips. In older data centers, heat is often removed partly through cooling towers. Hot water meets moving air, some water evaporates, and that phase change carries heat away. Effective, but it consumes fresh water continuously. But Firwater is a closed loop because the same coolant keeps circulating through sealed pipes: it absorbs heat from the chips, releases that heat through radiator-like fins, then flows back to the chips again. For Wisconsin Fairwater, Microsoft says more than 90% of the facility uses closed-loop liquid cooling, while the remaining portion uses outside air and switches to water only on the hottest days. ---- From "Microsoft" YouTube channel, (link in comment)

Satya Nadella: Microsoft’s latest Wisconsin AI data center keeps yearly water consumption no higher than that of 1 local restaurant. "The cooling loop is filled once and the data centre can operate effectively with zero water consumption. Daily water usage across a year is roughly equivalent to what a single restaurant would use" The mechanism is mainly about replacing evaporative cooling with closed-loop direct-to-chip liquid cooling, so water moves like coolant inside a sealed machine rather than being boiled off into the air. Hot GB200-class AI racks produce too much heat for normal air cooling, so cold liquid is pushed through pipes into the servers and across metal cold plates touching the hottest chips. The liquid enters the rack cool, absorbs heat from the chips through cold plates, then exits the rack at a higher temperature and carries that heat through pipes to a huge cooling system outside the compute floor. Microsoft says Fairwater sends that hot water to cooling “fins” beside the datacenter, where 172 20-foot fans blow air across the fins and dump the heat into the outside air. The important detail is that the air cools the water through metal surfaces, so the water does not need to evaporate the way many older datacenters use cooling towers. The cooled liquid then returns to the servers, repeats the loop, and keeps absorbing heat from the chips. In older data centers, heat is often removed partly through cooling towers. Hot water meets moving air, some water evaporates, and that phase change carries heat away. Effective, but it consumes fresh water continuously. But Firwater is a closed loop because the same coolant keeps circulating through sealed pipes: it absorbs heat from the chips, releases that heat through radiator-like fins, then flows back to the chips again. For Wisconsin Fairwater, Microsoft says more than 90% of the facility uses closed-loop liquid cooling, while the remaining portion uses outside air and switches to water only on the hottest days. ---- From "Microsoft" YouTube channel, (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

83,644 次观看 • 10 天前

This isn’t teleportation in the sci-fi sense. It’s something deeper and more fundamental. What’s actually happening is quantum state transfer, where information is reconstructed at another location using entanglement. But here’s the interesting part In my τ-framework, this works because reality isn’t continuous in the way we think. It’s structured through a time-field, where information exists as stable patterns across a temporal lattice. When two systems are entangled, they’re not “connected through space”… they’re sharing the same underlying time-structure. So the information doesn’t travel across distance. It reappears where the time-field allows the same pattern to stabilize. That’s why it looks instant. Not because it breaks physics but because it bypasses distance entirely. If this is correct, then teleportation isn’t movement… it’s reconstruction through temporal symmetry. The real question is: Can we control the time-field enough to scale this beyond quantum systems? Follow me for more answers

This isn’t teleportation in the sci-fi sense. It’s something deeper and more fundamental. What’s actually happening is quantum state transfer, where information is reconstructed at another location using entanglement. But here’s the interesting part In my τ-framework, this works because reality isn’t continuous in the way we think. It’s structured through a time-field, where information exists as stable patterns across a temporal lattice. When two systems are entangled, they’re not “connected through space”… they’re sharing the same underlying time-structure. So the information doesn’t travel across distance. It reappears where the time-field allows the same pattern to stabilize. That’s why it looks instant. Not because it breaks physics but because it bypasses distance entirely. If this is correct, then teleportation isn’t movement… it’s reconstruction through temporal symmetry. The real question is: Can we control the time-field enough to scale this beyond quantum systems? Follow me for more answers

TheNewPhysics

36,141 次观看 • 5 个月前

BREAKING: Eight days ago the White House paraded Apple as the champion of bringing chips home to America. This week Apple is quietly asking that same White House for permission to buy memory chips from a Chinese company sitting on the Pentagon's military blacklist. The decoupling did not break because anyone lost their nerve. It broke because AI made the chips too expensive to keep choosing sides. Watch the timing, because it is almost too perfect. On June 18, Trump announced an Apple and Intel partnership to build chips on American soil, the poster child for reshoring. Days later the Financial Times revealed Apple had spent over a month lobbying the administration for assurance it could buy DRAM from CXMT, a firm the Pentagon flags for alleged ties to the Chinese military. The same company, the same week, standing on both sides of the line Washington drew. What pushed Apple to the edge was pure cost. AI data centers have swallowed the world's memory supply and prices have rocketed. When Apple finally raised MacBook and iPad prices to cope, investors erased 263 billion dollars from its value in a single trading day, its worst since April of last year. The squeeze became unbearable, so the company went looking for the one supplier everyone else is warned away from. This is the part the chip war never priced in. Decoupling assumed American firms could afford to pick a side. That holds right up until a shortage gets severe enough that picking a side becomes unaffordable, and AI just found that point. The most valuable company on earth would rather approach the blacklist than keep paying the bill. A memory chip shortage did not just raise the price of a laptop. It bent the security policy of the United States until its flagship company walked up to a line it was told never to touch. Scarcity, it turns out, has no flag.

BREAKING: Eight days ago the White House paraded Apple as the champion of bringing chips home to America. This week Apple is quietly asking that same White House for permission to buy memory chips from a Chinese company sitting on the Pentagon's military blacklist. The decoupling did not break because anyone lost their nerve. It broke because AI made the chips too expensive to keep choosing sides. Watch the timing, because it is almost too perfect. On June 18, Trump announced an Apple and Intel partnership to build chips on American soil, the poster child for reshoring. Days later the Financial Times revealed Apple had spent over a month lobbying the administration for assurance it could buy DRAM from CXMT, a firm the Pentagon flags for alleged ties to the Chinese military. The same company, the same week, standing on both sides of the line Washington drew. What pushed Apple to the edge was pure cost. AI data centers have swallowed the world's memory supply and prices have rocketed. When Apple finally raised MacBook and iPad prices to cope, investors erased 263 billion dollars from its value in a single trading day, its worst since April of last year. The squeeze became unbearable, so the company went looking for the one supplier everyone else is warned away from. This is the part the chip war never priced in. Decoupling assumed American firms could afford to pick a side. That holds right up until a shortage gets severe enough that picking a side becomes unaffordable, and AI just found that point. The most valuable company on earth would rather approach the blacklist than keep paying the bill. A memory chip shortage did not just raise the price of a laptop. It bent the security policy of the United States until its flagship company walked up to a line it was told never to touch. Scarcity, it turns out, has no flag.

Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡

2,191,937 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨Rayan Cherki speaks on his showboating vs Arsenal in the Carabao Cup Final: 🗣️Cherki: “People think it was disrespect… no, it was INTENTIONAL. I grew up watching Nani in the FA Cup doing the same thing to Arsenal—pure confidence, pure freedom. “So when I had the moment, I did it for a reason. Not just to entertain… but to remind them. Some clubs, when you feel they’re vulnerable, you don’t just beat them… you play with them.” “I know Pep Guardiola didn’t like it, and I respect him… so if there’s anyone I apologise to, it’s Pep. But to the Arsenal fans? I’m not sorry…𝗦𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲

🚨Rayan Cherki speaks on his showboating vs Arsenal in the Carabao Cup Final: 🗣️Cherki: “People think it was disrespect… no, it was INTENTIONAL. I grew up watching Nani in the FA Cup doing the same thing to Arsenal—pure confidence, pure freedom. “So when I had the moment, I did it for a reason. Not just to entertain… but to remind them. Some clubs, when you feel they’re vulnerable, you don’t just beat them… you play with them.” “I know Pep Guardiola didn’t like it, and I respect him… so if there’s anyone I apologise to, it’s Pep. But to the Arsenal fans? I’m not sorry…𝗦𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲

Klay

4,920,492 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨 THIS IS INSANE This is Bitcoin’s 2021 cycle overlaid on the current $BTC chart. And the overlap is almost PERFECT. Every week, I come back expecting the pattern to finally break. It does NOT. Bitcoin keeps following the same structure: → Same final pump → Same cycle top → Same violent rejection → Same first major correction → Same weak recovery → Same setup before the real capitulation Now look at the numbers. 2021 cycle: → $BTC peaked near $69K → Dropped around 77% → Bottomed near $15.5K → The bear market lasted more than a year Current cycle: → $BTC peaked near $126K → The first major breakdown has already happened → Every recovery is getting weaker → The structure still points toward $40K That is exactly how the previous Bitcoin bear market developed. I’m not saying $BTC must repeat the 2021 cycle tick for tick. But when two cycle structures track this closely for this long, ignoring it becomes dangerous. Most people will turn bullish after every bounce. They did exactly the same thing in 2022. The real bottom only forms when almost everyone has lost hope. What are your thoughts on this? Follow and turn notifications on. I’ll post the warning BEFORE the final capitulation begins.

🚨 THIS IS INSANE This is Bitcoin’s 2021 cycle overlaid on the current $BTC chart. And the overlap is almost PERFECT. Every week, I come back expecting the pattern to finally break. It does NOT. Bitcoin keeps following the same structure: → Same final pump → Same cycle top → Same violent rejection → Same first major correction → Same weak recovery → Same setup before the real capitulation Now look at the numbers. 2021 cycle: → $BTC peaked near $69K → Dropped around 77% → Bottomed near $15.5K → The bear market lasted more than a year Current cycle: → $BTC peaked near $126K → The first major breakdown has already happened → Every recovery is getting weaker → The structure still points toward $40K That is exactly how the previous Bitcoin bear market developed. I’m not saying $BTC must repeat the 2021 cycle tick for tick. But when two cycle structures track this closely for this long, ignoring it becomes dangerous. Most people will turn bullish after every bounce. They did exactly the same thing in 2022. The real bottom only forms when almost everyone has lost hope. What are your thoughts on this? Follow and turn notifications on. I’ll post the warning BEFORE the final capitulation begins.

Wimar.X

131,600 次观看 • 1 个月前

seedance 2.0 prompt： 15-second comedic animated short in the world and visual tone of Zootopia. High-quality stylized 3D animation, expressive facial acting, clean readable slapstick, bright police-station interior, polished reflective floor, warm indoor daylight. Visual comedy only, little or no dialogue. Judy Hopps: small fast rabbit police officer, blue ZPD uniform, hyper-serious, explosive sprinting, precise slides, determined face, ears reacting sharply. Nick Wilde: tall slim fox, green shirt and tie, relaxed posture, minimal movement, dry amused expression. Background: one distant sloth clerk at a far desk only, never entering foreground. Key object: one single strawberry jelly donut, same donut for the entire clip, falls from Nick’s small brown paper bag, rolls across the floor, gets stopped by Nick, then gets sealed into one clear evidence bag by Judy. No duplicate donuts, no extra props, no continuity errors. Camera language: third-person cinematic comedy, medium shots, low-angle close tracking on the donut, one side tracking shot, one final tight two-shot. Smooth stabilized movement, tiny comedic whip corrections only when needed. Always keep donut, Judy, and Nick spatially readable. 0:00–0:03 Medium shot, light tracking in ZPD lobby. Judy and Nick walk side by side past the front desk. Judy carries a small clipboard, Nick carries a brown paper bag. One strawberry jelly donut slips out of the bag, drops to the floor, and starts rolling. Judy’s ears snap upright and she locks onto it like a fleeing suspect. Camera dips lower to keep the donut in the foreground. 0:03–0:06 Low close tracking shot on the same donut rolling fast over the shiny floor. Judy bursts into frame from behind, clipboard tucked under one arm, sprinting hard with both paws reaching forward. She almost grabs it but misses by centimeters. The donut keeps rolling. Quick readable camera adjustment, no chaotic motion. 0:06–0:09 Side medium-wide tracking shot. The donut curves around a fixed desk leg. Judy makes an exaggerated quick step and low slide to intercept, but it slips past her again. She pivots and chases immediately. In the background, Nick simply walks on a shorter diagonal path, calm and unhurried. Keep the same donut clearly visible. 0:09–0:12 Frontal medium-close shot. The donut rolls toward camera. Nick’s paw enters calmly from frame right and presses the same donut to a stop. Judy slides in from frame left and freezes with her nose just inches from it, still in full arrest pose. Hold the reaction beat clearly. 0:12–0:15 Tight two-shot. Nick lifts the same donut with two fingers and hands it over with a dry smug grin. Judy instantly switches back to formal police mode, pulls out one clear evidence bag, seals the same donut inside, and proudly presents it to camera like a major arrest. Nick stands beside her with an amused look. In deep background, the sloth clerk slowly raises a stamp. End on a clean comedic freeze frame: evidence bag with the donut centered in foreground, Judy serious and proud, Nick smirking beside her. Consistency rules: same donut throughout, no extra donuts, no costume changes, clipboard stays with Judy, background sloth remains distant, no extra foreground characters, no object popping in or out, final frame must clearly show the donut inside the evidence bag.

seedance 2.0 prompt： 15-second comedic animated short in the world and visual tone of Zootopia. High-quality stylized 3D animation, expressive facial acting, clean readable slapstick, bright police-station interior, polished reflective floor, warm indoor daylight. Visual comedy only, little or no dialogue. Judy Hopps: small fast rabbit police officer, blue ZPD uniform, hyper-serious, explosive sprinting, precise slides, determined face, ears reacting sharply. Nick Wilde: tall slim fox, green shirt and tie, relaxed posture, minimal movement, dry amused expression. Background: one distant sloth clerk at a far desk only, never entering foreground. Key object: one single strawberry jelly donut, same donut for the entire clip, falls from Nick’s small brown paper bag, rolls across the floor, gets stopped by Nick, then gets sealed into one clear evidence bag by Judy. No duplicate donuts, no extra props, no continuity errors. Camera language: third-person cinematic comedy, medium shots, low-angle close tracking on the donut, one side tracking shot, one final tight two-shot. Smooth stabilized movement, tiny comedic whip corrections only when needed. Always keep donut, Judy, and Nick spatially readable. 0:00–0:03 Medium shot, light tracking in ZPD lobby. Judy and Nick walk side by side past the front desk. Judy carries a small clipboard, Nick carries a brown paper bag. One strawberry jelly donut slips out of the bag, drops to the floor, and starts rolling. Judy’s ears snap upright and she locks onto it like a fleeing suspect. Camera dips lower to keep the donut in the foreground. 0:03–0:06 Low close tracking shot on the same donut rolling fast over the shiny floor. Judy bursts into frame from behind, clipboard tucked under one arm, sprinting hard with both paws reaching forward. She almost grabs it but misses by centimeters. The donut keeps rolling. Quick readable camera adjustment, no chaotic motion. 0:06–0:09 Side medium-wide tracking shot. The donut curves around a fixed desk leg. Judy makes an exaggerated quick step and low slide to intercept, but it slips past her again. She pivots and chases immediately. In the background, Nick simply walks on a shorter diagonal path, calm and unhurried. Keep the same donut clearly visible. 0:09–0:12 Frontal medium-close shot. The donut rolls toward camera. Nick’s paw enters calmly from frame right and presses the same donut to a stop. Judy slides in from frame left and freezes with her nose just inches from it, still in full arrest pose. Hold the reaction beat clearly. 0:12–0:15 Tight two-shot. Nick lifts the same donut with two fingers and hands it over with a dry smug grin. Judy instantly switches back to formal police mode, pulls out one clear evidence bag, seals the same donut inside, and proudly presents it to camera like a major arrest. Nick stands beside her with an amused look. In deep background, the sloth clerk slowly raises a stamp. End on a clean comedic freeze frame: evidence bag with the donut centered in foreground, Judy serious and proud, Nick smirking beside her. Consistency rules: same donut throughout, no extra donuts, no costume changes, clipboard stays with Judy, background sloth remains distant, no extra foreground characters, no object popping in or out, final frame must clearly show the donut inside the evidence bag.

Midjourney Sref and prompt Library

13,096 次观看 • 5 个月前

Two weeks apart. Same person. Different choices. This isn’t a “fell off” post. This isn’t shame. This is reality. This is part of the story. After the show, I went from 168.4 lbs to 182.2 lbs. And at this point… it’s a choice. I’ve realized something about myself: When I hit a peak, I tend to sabotage it so I have something to chase again. But the truth is.. Greatness is built by staying disciplined after the high, not restarting from the low. And as someone who’s lived both extremes more times than I can count, I’ll say this with full honesty: The pain of discipline is ALWAYS better than the pain of regret. So here’s the good news… I get to use this moment as fuel. I get to document the entire climb back and show you exactly how I’m going to do it using the same systems I teach in G7 Coaching and the G7 Fitness App. No waiting for New Year’s. No “Diet Starts Tomorrow.” We start today. It’s Game Time. 💪🏾😤

Two weeks apart. Same person. Different choices. This isn’t a “fell off” post. This isn’t shame. This is reality. This is part of the story. After the show, I went from 168.4 lbs to 182.2 lbs. And at this point… it’s a choice. I’ve realized something about myself: When I hit a peak, I tend to sabotage it so I have something to chase again. But the truth is.. Greatness is built by staying disciplined after the high, not restarting from the low. And as someone who’s lived both extremes more times than I can count, I’ll say this with full honesty: The pain of discipline is ALWAYS better than the pain of regret. So here’s the good news… I get to use this moment as fuel. I get to document the entire climb back and show you exactly how I’m going to do it using the same systems I teach in G7 Coaching and the G7 Fitness App. No waiting for New Year’s. No “Diet Starts Tomorrow.” We start today. It’s Game Time. 💪🏾😤

FOUSEY

17,755 次观看 • 9 个月前