Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

This knowledge will make or break Ken players, not an exaggeration Showing how to deal with 4F and 5F buttons, either by whiff punish or trade from common strings and the confirms available, also Hokuto Rev Blow punish based on that knowledge #cotw_ken #cotw

SchoolBus

6,996 subscribers

12,709 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

#cotw_ken #cotw

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Learning Whiff Punishing from Leshar 0:00- A way to whiff punish strings designed to beat retaliation buttons. For example, against JP’s: on block > or buffer/placement Leshar uses options such as: walk back > crouch block > Terry whiff punish walk back > slight walk forward > Akuma st.HP whiff punish 0:07- After blocking a max range if you simply crouch block and wait to whiff punish, strings like: > often end up getting guarded instead. 0:12- So instead, he uses: block walk back slight walk forward press HP after seeing the whiff This makes it easier to whiff punish both and placements. If st.HP is too difficult, using is also fine. 0:41- However, slightly deeper type strings can catch the walk back, making this option lose.

Learning Whiff Punishing from Leshar 0:00- A way to whiff punish strings designed to beat retaliation buttons. For example, against JP’s: on block > or buffer/placement Leshar uses options such as: walk back > crouch block > Terry whiff punish walk back > slight walk forward > Akuma st.HP whiff punish 0:07- After blocking a max range if you simply crouch block and wait to whiff punish, strings like: > often end up getting guarded instead. 0:12- So instead, he uses: block walk back slight walk forward press HP after seeing the whiff This makes it easier to whiff punish both and placements. If st.HP is too difficult, using is also fine. 0:41- However, slightly deeper type strings can catch the walk back, making this option lose.

白(ワラキア)

110,811 views • 3 months ago

Steven Pinker (Steven Pinker) returns to Conversations with Tyler with an argument that common knowledge—those infinite loops of "I know that you know that I know"—is the hidden infrastructure that enables human coordination, from accepting paper money to toppling dictators. But tylercowen wonders: can there be too much common knowledge? COWEN: For a while now, we’ve had this thing called anonymous posters on the internet. Do you think, on average, they make the world better or worse? PINKER: Interesting. Probably worse. COWEN: They help make some things common knowledge. If there are things that are not common knowledge, some anonymous poster will say it. There’ll also be misinformation. Is that a clue that maybe at the margin, we have too much common knowledge rather than too little?

Steven Pinker (Steven Pinker) returns to Conversations with Tyler with an argument that common knowledge—those infinite loops of "I know that you know that I know"—is the hidden infrastructure that enables human coordination, from accepting paper money to toppling dictators. But tylercowen wonders: can there be too much common knowledge? COWEN: For a while now, we’ve had this thing called anonymous posters on the internet. Do you think, on average, they make the world better or worse? PINKER: Interesting. Probably worse. COWEN: They help make some things common knowledge. If there are things that are not common knowledge, some anonymous poster will say it. There’ll also be misinformation. Is that a clue that maybe at the margin, we have too much common knowledge rather than too little?

Conversations with Tyler

22,273 views • 11 months ago

ROUNDS: ‘FIRSTHAND’ UAP WHISTLEBLOWERS “The only folks that [I] sat down and talked with… have *firsthand* knowledge of either a program or… firsthand knowledge of actually seeing something or touching something that to them was not explainable.” “There is something to this.”

ROUNDS: ‘FIRSTHAND’ UAP WHISTLEBLOWERS “The only folks that [I] sat down and talked with… have firsthand knowledge of either a program or… firsthand knowledge of actually seeing something or touching something that to them was not explainable.” “There is something to this.”

Marik vR

131,544 views • 5 months ago

"Salience is the more common way that we entertain common knowledge, generated by certain common knowledge generators like direct speech, but also laughter, I argue, tears, blushing. We have nonverbal common knowledge generators and eye contact. With eye contact, you're looking at the part of the person that's looking at the part of you that's looking at the part of them, ad infinitum. Eye contact is a very powerful signal. Eye contact makes something that was private knowledge, common knowledge, which is why we and our primate ancestors are very sensitive to eye contact." Clip on common knowledge, the topic of my new book, from an interview with Robert Contofalsky (Robert Contofalsky) of R-Academy. -- When Everyone Knows That Everyone Knows . . .: Common Knowledge and the Mysteries of Money, Power, and Everyday Life:

"Salience is the more common way that we entertain common knowledge, generated by certain common knowledge generators like direct speech, but also laughter, I argue, tears, blushing. We have nonverbal common knowledge generators and eye contact. With eye contact, you're looking at the part of the person that's looking at the part of you that's looking at the part of them, ad infinitum. Eye contact is a very powerful signal. Eye contact makes something that was private knowledge, common knowledge, which is why we and our primate ancestors are very sensitive to eye contact." Clip on common knowledge, the topic of my new book, from an interview with Robert Contofalsky (Robert Contofalsky) of R-Academy. -- When Everyone Knows That Everyone Knows . . .: Common Knowledge and the Mysteries of Money, Power, and Everyday Life:

Steven Pinker

47,007 views • 9 months ago

#unitytips We were shocked to learn that this is not common knowledge! Move an object into the view of your editor camera either from GameObject -> Move To View or the shortcut ctrl + alt + f. Spread the word! 😃 #gamedev #indiedev

#unitytips We were shocked to learn that this is not common knowledge! Move an object into the view of your editor camera either from GameObject -> Move To View or the shortcut ctrl + alt + f. Spread the word! 😃 #gamedev #indiedev

Binary Impact

47,784 views • 1 year ago

Why don't we just cut the crap and say it? And the conclusion that I came to, this is an earlier book, The Stuff of Thought (subtitle is Language is a Window into Human Nature), is that direct speech generates common knowledge, and that common knowledge is the basis of our social relationships. Two people--if they're friends, if they're lovers, if they're transactional partners, if they're in a dominance hierarchy--all of those are equilibria in coordination games, and they're matters of common knowledge. In the case of friends, it's we're equal, we would do anything for each other, we're there for each other, and that's kind of the common knowledge that makes friends friends. Clip on direct speech and common knowledge from an interview with Robert Contofalsky (Robert Contofalsky) of R-Academy. -- My new book, When Everyone Knows That Everyone Knows . . .: Common Knowledge and the Mysteries of Money, Power, and Everyday Life is available here:

Why don't we just cut the crap and say it? And the conclusion that I came to, this is an earlier book, The Stuff of Thought (subtitle is Language is a Window into Human Nature), is that direct speech generates common knowledge, and that common knowledge is the basis of our social relationships. Two people--if they're friends, if they're lovers, if they're transactional partners, if they're in a dominance hierarchy--all of those are equilibria in coordination games, and they're matters of common knowledge. In the case of friends, it's we're equal, we would do anything for each other, we're there for each other, and that's kind of the common knowledge that makes friends friends. Clip on direct speech and common knowledge from an interview with Robert Contofalsky (Robert Contofalsky) of R-Academy. -- My new book, When Everyone Knows That Everyone Knows . . .: Common Knowledge and the Mysteries of Money, Power, and Everyday Life is available here:

Steven Pinker

56,084 views • 9 months ago

BRENNAN: Are there classified annexes or portions of the MOU that have not been made public, and will they be shared with Congress? WALTZ: Not to my knowledge BRENNAN: What's the 'gentleman's agreement'? WALTZ: This is an ongoing negotiation

BRENNAN: Are there classified annexes or portions of the MOU that have not been made public, and will they be shared with Congress? WALTZ: Not to my knowledge BRENNAN: What's the 'gentleman's agreement'? WALTZ: This is an ongoing negotiation

Aaron Rupar

51,153 views • 2 months ago

Galen Druke (Galen Druke) interviewed me about common knowledge, the topic of my new book (link in thread): Me: What common knowledge does in informal interactions is it ratifies social relationships. So if two people are friends, if they’re lovers, if one of them is dominant and the other is subordinate—that is, one always gets it this way—these exist because each party knows the other one knows they exist. And they survive by being common knowledge. Sometimes we don’t want to destroy a relationship, and so we keep things out of common knowledge by using euphemism or innuendo or genteel hypocrisy. Druke: What’s an example of this? Me: At the end of a date, you’ve got a couple of friends and one says, “Hey, do you want to kind of come up for coffee—or Netflix and chill?” That’s very different from, “Do you want to have sex?” even though if they’re both grownups, they both know that it’s having sex. So there’s a denial of common knowledge, which would allow them—if the overture is not reciprocated—to go back to being platonic friends or workplace colleagues.

Galen Druke (Galen Druke) interviewed me about common knowledge, the topic of my new book (link in thread): Me: What common knowledge does in informal interactions is it ratifies social relationships. So if two people are friends, if they’re lovers, if one of them is dominant and the other is subordinate—that is, one always gets it this way—these exist because each party knows the other one knows they exist. And they survive by being common knowledge. Sometimes we don’t want to destroy a relationship, and so we keep things out of common knowledge by using euphemism or innuendo or genteel hypocrisy. Druke: What’s an example of this? Me: At the end of a date, you’ve got a couple of friends and one says, “Hey, do you want to kind of come up for coffee—or Netflix and chill?” That’s very different from, “Do you want to have sex?” even though if they’re both grownups, they both know that it’s having sex. So there’s a denial of common knowledge, which would allow them—if the overture is not reciprocated—to go back to being platonic friends or workplace colleagues.

Steven Pinker

22,350 views • 10 months ago

3 Press Break Strategies That Flip the Script and Punish Full-Court Pressure They say pressure can bust pipes or make diamonds. It’s not different on the basketball court. -Mediocre teams panic when they get pressed. They lose their composure, leading to turnovers and bad shots. -Good teams are able to “handle” pressure. -The best teams are able to “beat” pressure. They see being pressed as an opportunity - an opportunity to attack and score. This video will help you become one of those teams! Whether you coach youth, high school, or college players, chances are you're going to see full-court pressure. When that moment comes, will your team panic… or attack? If you're looking to stop giving up live-ball turnovers and start scoring layups on the press, check out this video. 3 Game-Tested Press Breaks That Make The Press Pay! 1. Press Break #1: The “Bubble” Press Break From The Coaching System With Danny Miles 2. Press Break #2: 2-Up From The Youth Coaching System With Jim Huber 3. Press Break #3: Sideline Attack and the Power of the 45° Drive From Get Comfortable Playing At An Uncomfortable Pace With Rob Brost

3 Press Break Strategies That Flip the Script and Punish Full-Court Pressure They say pressure can bust pipes or make diamonds. It’s not different on the basketball court. -Mediocre teams panic when they get pressed. They lose their composure, leading to turnovers and bad shots. -Good teams are able to “handle” pressure. -The best teams are able to “beat” pressure. They see being pressed as an opportunity - an opportunity to attack and score. This video will help you become one of those teams! Whether you coach youth, high school, or college players, chances are you're going to see full-court pressure. When that moment comes, will your team panic… or attack? If you're looking to stop giving up live-ball turnovers and start scoring layups on the press, check out this video. 3 Game-Tested Press Breaks That Make The Press Pay! 1. Press Break #1: The “Bubble” Press Break From The Coaching System With Danny Miles 2. Press Break #2: 2-Up From The Youth Coaching System With Jim Huber 3. Press Break #3: Sideline Attack and the Power of the 45° Drive From Get Comfortable Playing At An Uncomfortable Pace With Rob Brost

Joe Haefner | Breakthrough Basketball

52,205 views • 1 year ago

“Social media now allow any of us to be an executioner or a grand inquisitor—pile on—and our tweet shaming someone could go viral or cause other people to tweet. That can happen in academia, where you can gin up a petition denouncing someone in a few minutes with social media. I have a chapter in When Everyone Knows That Everyone Knows..., in particular on academic cancel culture—or cancel culture more generally—why people feel the urge to cancel, even in an arena like academia, which ought to be about ideas, including ideas that are advanced with the point that they be evaluated and falsified. And so you think that what you say might be wrong, but it surely can’t be evil. But in academia, there’s been a temptation to treat certain ideas as evil and to try to punish or censor the person broaching them.” Clip on common knowledge, the topic of my new book, from an interview with Robert Contofalsky (Robert Contofalsky) of R-Academy. -- When Everyone Knows That Everyone Knows . . .: Common Knowledge and the Mysteries of Money, Power, and Everyday Life:

“Social media now allow any of us to be an executioner or a grand inquisitor—pile on—and our tweet shaming someone could go viral or cause other people to tweet. That can happen in academia, where you can gin up a petition denouncing someone in a few minutes with social media. I have a chapter in When Everyone Knows That Everyone Knows..., in particular on academic cancel culture—or cancel culture more generally—why people feel the urge to cancel, even in an arena like academia, which ought to be about ideas, including ideas that are advanced with the point that they be evaluated and falsified. And so you think that what you say might be wrong, but it surely can’t be evil. But in academia, there’s been a temptation to treat certain ideas as evil and to try to punish or censor the person broaching them.” Clip on common knowledge, the topic of my new book, from an interview with Robert Contofalsky (Robert Contofalsky) of R-Academy. -- When Everyone Knows That Everyone Knows . . .: Common Knowledge and the Mysteries of Money, Power, and Everyday Life:

Steven Pinker

45,050 views • 8 months ago

Paul: Hegseth said he had no knowledge of this and it did not happen. And then the next day, from the podium at the white house, they're saying it did happen. So either he was lying to us on Sunday or he's incompetent

Paul: Hegseth said he had no knowledge of this and it did not happen. And then the next day, from the podium at the white house, they're saying it did happen. So either he was lying to us on Sunday or he's incompetent

Acyn

389,003 views • 8 months ago

The Ready or Not 1.0 update absolutely blows me away. The amount of knowledge and programming that has to go into this. Here's an excerpt from their 1.0 devlog (apparently got released on a random channel? Will link full 14 min below) I'm in awe.

The Ready or Not 1.0 update absolutely blows me away. The amount of knowledge and programming that has to go into this. Here's an excerpt from their 1.0 devlog (apparently got released on a random channel? Will link full 14 min below) I'm in awe.

TactiGamer

171,975 views • 2 years ago

.David Deutsch: "Conventional pessimism is right that civilization has no guaranteed future, nor does our species. The overwhelming majority of civilizations and species that have ever existed are now extinct, including significantly every one of our cousin species, every species that has ever tried to survive by creating knowledge that was not in their genome. New explanatory knowledge, how to make clothes and fire and farming and to live the new ways of life that that enabled. That is our biological niche to survive through the exercise of creativity and we are the last species left in that niche. For such species, stasis is not available. We conquer problems by creating knowledge or they conquer us."

.David Deutsch: "Conventional pessimism is right that civilization has no guaranteed future, nor does our species. The overwhelming majority of civilizations and species that have ever existed are now extinct, including significantly every one of our cousin species, every species that has ever tried to survive by creating knowledge that was not in their genome. New explanatory knowledge, how to make clothes and fire and farming and to live the new ways of life that that enabled. That is our biological niche to survive through the exercise of creativity and we are the last species left in that niche. For such species, stasis is not available. We conquer problems by creating knowledge or they conquer us."

Deutsch Explains

14,422 views • 9 months ago

I received a question about this, so I used actual match footage to take a closer look at Leshar's neutral game and how he cycles through his reads Basic Neutral Game He walks back and forth while using medium P/K to deal with projectiles, keeping his fingers on light P/K to react to Drive Rushes and forward movement, while also using whiffed light attacks to provoke the opponent into moving He also uses slight backwalk into crouch block to bait whiffs, then whiff punishes with when he sees an opening This seems to be his basic stance in neutral 0:11 He walks while keeping his fingers on then reacts to Ken's Drive Rush with to stop him 0:13 After blocking Ken's he briefly waits, anticipating a sequence such as a slight walk forward into cr.LP/cr.MP, then briefly crouch blocks before backwalking into st.HP 0:17 He baits a whiff with slight backwalk into crouch block, then whiff punishes with 0:18 After walking back and forth, he sees Ken whiff and presses How He Cycles Through Reads ① 0:21 Ken walks back and forth and waits → Leshar throws a Hadoken to see how Ken reacts ② 0:23 Ken steps forward → Leshar backwalks, looking to make Ken whiff or similar buttons → Once Ken gets into range, he waits with crouch block ③ 0:24 Both players crouch block at the tip range of → Leshar walks forward slightly and presses st.LP → Ken reacts to the whiff with → Leshar deals with it by crouch blocking At this point, it looks like he is checking how Ken reacts to slight walk-forward buttons ④ Against the shimmy after Ken's Drive Rush → Leshar uses fuzzy cr.LP → It trades with Ken's delayed ⑤ 0:27 Both players walk forward slightly and block each other's → Leshar uses a slight walk-forward 6HP from farther away → He blocks Ken's retaliatory Similar to ③, it looks like he is checking how Ken reacts to close-range walk-forward buttons, such as whether Ken presses a button when he sees the walk forward, while also checking whether Ken will continue to block when the same approach comes from farther away ⑥ 0:32 Ken Perfect Parries the Hadoken → Leshar Drive Rushes with st.LP → Ken blocks ⑦ 0:34 Ken Drive Rush st.LP → Shimmy → Leshar's fuzzy cr.LP counter hits Since the fuzzy cr.LP worked in ④, it looks like he is using the same option again to see how Ken reacts ⑧ 0:37 Ken blocks → Hadoken → Ken uses a delayed walk-forward → Leshar walks forward and blocks → Punishes with Since the backwalk-to-whiff-punish situation from ② and ③ wasn't happening very often, it looks like he is now adding walk-forward blocking as another option ⑨ 0:41 Two-charge Hadoken → Ken sees the charge and jumps forward → Shoryuken After Ken Perfect Parried the Hadoken in ⑥, Leshar appears to use a two-charge Hadoken to encourage another Parry while still keeping the risk of a jump relatively low ⑩ 0:43 Ken whiffs → at tip range → Leshar slight walk-forward crouch blocks This looks like another option based on the fact that walk-forward blocking had worked in ⑧ ⑪ 0:45 Blocks Jinrai's Light follow-up → Slight walk-forward ⑫ 4:18 Leshar's 6HP gets blocked at close range → Backwalk → Ken's retaliatory throw whiffs → Leshar punishes with a backwalk st.HP Based on situations such as ⑤ and ⑧, it looks like Leshar had determined that Ken wasn't frequently retaliating with an immediate low button, allowing him to add backwalking as another option ⑬ 4:39 After a Punish Counter back throw, Leshar waits → Slight walk-forward st.HP at tip range After confirming in situations such as ⑤ and ⑪ that Ken wasn't backwalking in response to his walk-forward buttons, he chooses slight walk-forward st.HP Conclusion It seems like Leshar cycles through his reads roughly like this 1⃣ Start with a low-risk option ↓ 2⃣ See how the opponent reacts ↓ 3⃣ Try a different option based on that reaction ↓ 4⃣ See how the opponent reacts to that option ↓ 5⃣ Confirm the information again in a later situation ↓ 6⃣ Once he has a clearer idea of the opponent's reactions, add new options based on that information Rather than trying to "make a big read and land a hit," I personally think his approach is closer to "carefully checking the opponent's reactions one by one, then making decisions based on the information he gathers"

I received a question about this, so I used actual match footage to take a closer look at Leshar's neutral game and how he cycles through his reads Basic Neutral Game He walks back and forth while using medium P/K to deal with projectiles, keeping his fingers on light P/K to react to Drive Rushes and forward movement, while also using whiffed light attacks to provoke the opponent into moving He also uses slight backwalk into crouch block to bait whiffs, then whiff punishes with when he sees an opening This seems to be his basic stance in neutral 0:11 He walks while keeping his fingers on then reacts to Ken's Drive Rush with to stop him 0:13 After blocking Ken's he briefly waits, anticipating a sequence such as a slight walk forward into cr.LP/cr.MP, then briefly crouch blocks before backwalking into st.HP 0:17 He baits a whiff with slight backwalk into crouch block, then whiff punishes with 0:18 After walking back and forth, he sees Ken whiff and presses How He Cycles Through Reads ① 0:21 Ken walks back and forth and waits → Leshar throws a Hadoken to see how Ken reacts ② 0:23 Ken steps forward → Leshar backwalks, looking to make Ken whiff or similar buttons → Once Ken gets into range, he waits with crouch block ③ 0:24 Both players crouch block at the tip range of → Leshar walks forward slightly and presses st.LP → Ken reacts to the whiff with → Leshar deals with it by crouch blocking At this point, it looks like he is checking how Ken reacts to slight walk-forward buttons ④ Against the shimmy after Ken's Drive Rush → Leshar uses fuzzy cr.LP → It trades with Ken's delayed ⑤ 0:27 Both players walk forward slightly and block each other's → Leshar uses a slight walk-forward 6HP from farther away → He blocks Ken's retaliatory Similar to ③, it looks like he is checking how Ken reacts to close-range walk-forward buttons, such as whether Ken presses a button when he sees the walk forward, while also checking whether Ken will continue to block when the same approach comes from farther away ⑥ 0:32 Ken Perfect Parries the Hadoken → Leshar Drive Rushes with st.LP → Ken blocks ⑦ 0:34 Ken Drive Rush st.LP → Shimmy → Leshar's fuzzy cr.LP counter hits Since the fuzzy cr.LP worked in ④, it looks like he is using the same option again to see how Ken reacts ⑧ 0:37 Ken blocks → Hadoken → Ken uses a delayed walk-forward → Leshar walks forward and blocks → Punishes with Since the backwalk-to-whiff-punish situation from ② and ③ wasn't happening very often, it looks like he is now adding walk-forward blocking as another option ⑨ 0:41 Two-charge Hadoken → Ken sees the charge and jumps forward → Shoryuken After Ken Perfect Parried the Hadoken in ⑥, Leshar appears to use a two-charge Hadoken to encourage another Parry while still keeping the risk of a jump relatively low ⑩ 0:43 Ken whiffs → at tip range → Leshar slight walk-forward crouch blocks This looks like another option based on the fact that walk-forward blocking had worked in ⑧ ⑪ 0:45 Blocks Jinrai's Light follow-up → Slight walk-forward ⑫ 4:18 Leshar's 6HP gets blocked at close range → Backwalk → Ken's retaliatory throw whiffs → Leshar punishes with a backwalk st.HP Based on situations such as ⑤ and ⑧, it looks like Leshar had determined that Ken wasn't frequently retaliating with an immediate low button, allowing him to add backwalking as another option ⑬ 4:39 After a Punish Counter back throw, Leshar waits → Slight walk-forward st.HP at tip range After confirming in situations such as ⑤ and ⑪ that Ken wasn't backwalking in response to his walk-forward buttons, he chooses slight walk-forward st.HP Conclusion It seems like Leshar cycles through his reads roughly like this 1⃣ Start with a low-risk option ↓ 2⃣ See how the opponent reacts ↓ 3⃣ Try a different option based on that reaction ↓ 4⃣ See how the opponent reacts to that option ↓ 5⃣ Confirm the information again in a later situation ↓ 6⃣ Once he has a clearer idea of the opponent's reactions, add new options based on that information Rather than trying to "make a big read and land a hit," I personally think his approach is closer to "carefully checking the opponent's reactions one by one, then making decisions based on the information he gathers"

白(ワラキア)

50,023 views • 7 days ago

🚨 JUST NOW: President Trump CONFIRMS America will get the Iranian nuclear dust and BANS Israel from bombing Lebanon "The U.S.A. will get all Nuclear “Dust,” created by our great B2 Bombers - No money will exchange hands in any way, shape, or form." "This deal is in no way subject to Lebanon, either, but the USA will, separately, work with Lebanon, and deal with the Hezboolah situation in an appropriate manner. Israel will not be bombing Lebanon any longer. They are PROHIBITED from doing so by the U.S.A. Enough is enough!!!"

🚨 JUST NOW: President Trump CONFIRMS America will get the Iranian nuclear dust and BANS Israel from bombing Lebanon "The U.S.A. will get all Nuclear “Dust,” created by our great B2 Bombers - No money will exchange hands in any way, shape, or form." "This deal is in no way subject to Lebanon, either, but the USA will, separately, work with Lebanon, and deal with the Hezboolah situation in an appropriate manner. Israel will not be bombing Lebanon any longer. They are PROHIBITED from doing so by the U.S.A. Enough is enough!!!"

Eric Daugherty

115,139 views • 4 months ago

He has spent years documenting the structural and geometric patterns that connect sacred sites across continents and millennia. From Gobekli Tepe, which predates recorded history by thousands of years, through medieval constructions, the same geometric principles and celestial alignments appear again and again. These are not coincidences or independent discoveries scattered across isolated cultures. The evidence points to a shared body of knowledge, a common understanding of proportion, orientation, and cosmic rhythm that was encoded into stone. The consistency is what demands explanation. When the same angular relationships and astronomical sight lines show up in structures separated by oceans and ages, it suggests either direct transmission of knowledge or inheritance from an earlier, more unified tradition. Either way, the implications challenge conventional timelines of human development and technological sophistication.

He has spent years documenting the structural and geometric patterns that connect sacred sites across continents and millennia. From Gobekli Tepe, which predates recorded history by thousands of years, through medieval constructions, the same geometric principles and celestial alignments appear again and again. These are not coincidences or independent discoveries scattered across isolated cultures. The evidence points to a shared body of knowledge, a common understanding of proportion, orientation, and cosmic rhythm that was encoded into stone. The consistency is what demands explanation. When the same angular relationships and astronomical sight lines show up in structures separated by oceans and ages, it suggests either direct transmission of knowledge or inheritance from an earlier, more unified tradition. Either way, the implications challenge conventional timelines of human development and technological sophistication.

Randall Carlson

20,474 views • 1 month ago

WHY THE NEW GENERATION RAP FANS HATE THE JAY Z FREESTYLE.. 1.) ITS NO BEAT 2.) IT’S TOO MANY WORDS 3.) THEY DON’T HAVE ENOUGH KNOWLEDGE ON THE HISTORY OF RAP TO UNDERSTAND NODS TO PUBLIC ENEMYS “911 IS A JOKE” 4.) ITS NO HOOK 5.) ITS NO AUTO TUNE OR HARMONIZING 6.) HE HAS NO JEWELRY OR DESIGNER CLOTHES ON See today’s casual rap fan does not really understand REAL HIP HOP They know HIP-POP a commercialized version of it That does not deal with knowledge And information through a lot of words from a rapper that make sense They are trained to listen to the beat Or the hook Or the autotune singing Or look at the outfit or the jewelry And since JAY Z WENT BACK TO THE ESSENCE OF WHAT THE ACTUAL ONLY SKILL ELEMENT OF HIP HOP IS “THE LYRICISM” Majority of the fans do not know what they are looking at Or even have the knowledge on how to listen to hip hop correctly enough to judge it properly

WHY THE NEW GENERATION RAP FANS HATE THE JAY Z FREESTYLE.. 1.) ITS NO BEAT 2.) IT’S TOO MANY WORDS 3.) THEY DON’T HAVE ENOUGH KNOWLEDGE ON THE HISTORY OF RAP TO UNDERSTAND NODS TO PUBLIC ENEMYS “911 IS A JOKE” 4.) ITS NO HOOK 5.) ITS NO AUTO TUNE OR HARMONIZING 6.) HE HAS NO JEWELRY OR DESIGNER CLOTHES ON See today’s casual rap fan does not really understand REAL HIP HOP They know HIP-POP a commercialized version of it That does not deal with knowledge And information through a lot of words from a rapper that make sense They are trained to listen to the beat Or the hook Or the autotune singing Or look at the outfit or the jewelry And since JAY Z WENT BACK TO THE ESSENCE OF WHAT THE ACTUAL ONLY SKILL ELEMENT OF HIP HOP IS “THE LYRICISM” Majority of the fans do not know what they are looking at Or even have the knowledge on how to listen to hip hop correctly enough to judge it properly

MASTER STUDENT🤲🏾

75,919 views • 2 months ago