Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

This knowledge will make or break Ken players, not an exaggeration Showing how to deal with 4F and 5F buttons, either by whiff punish or trade from common strings and the confirms available, also Hokuto Rev Blow punish based on that knowledge #cotw_ken #cotw

Sometimes_Fendo's profile picture

SchoolBus

6,996 subscribers

12,709 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

#cotw_ken#cotw
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Learning Whiff Punishing from Leshar 0:00- A way to whiff punish strings designed to beat retaliation buttons. For example, against JP’s: on block > or buffer/placement Leshar uses options such as: walk back > crouch block > Terry whiff punish walk back > slight walk forward > Akuma st.HP whiff punish 0:07- After blocking a max range if you simply crouch block and wait to whiff punish, strings like: > often end up getting guarded instead. 0:12- So instead, he uses: block walk back slight walk forward press HP after seeing the whiff This makes it easier to whiff punish both and placements. If st.HP is too difficult, using is also fine. 0:41- However, slightly deeper type strings can catch the walk back, making this option lose.
0:44

Learning Whiff Punishing from Leshar 0:00- A way to whiff punish strings designed to beat retaliation buttons. For example, against JP’s: on block > or buffer/placement Leshar uses options such as: walk back > crouch block > Terry whiff punish walk back > slight walk forward > Akuma st.HP whiff punish 0:07- After blocking a max range if you simply crouch block and wait to whiff punish, strings like: > often end up getting guarded instead. 0:12- So instead, he uses: block walk back slight walk forward press HP after seeing the whiff This makes it easier to whiff punish both and placements. If st.HP is too difficult, using is also fine. 0:41- However, slightly deeper type strings can catch the walk back, making this option lose.

白(ワラキア)

110,700 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

This is how I spend my time now. Today I also turned on the whiff sweep recording and attempted to either anti-air, whiff punish, OR counter-DI. It’s a brutal drill, but it’s the way forward.
0:59

This is how I spend my time now. Today I also turned on the whiff sweep recording and attempted to either anti-air, whiff punish, OR counter-DI. It’s a brutal drill, but it’s the way forward.

PAR SGF | Fem!Shep 🔜 CEO

41,509 просмотров • 1 год назад

ROUNDS: ‘FIRSTHAND’ UAP WHISTLEBLOWERS “The only folks that [I] sat down and talked with… have *firsthand* knowledge of either a program or… firsthand knowledge of actually seeing something or touching something that to them was not explainable.” “There is something to this.”
0:56

ROUNDS: ‘FIRSTHAND’ UAP WHISTLEBLOWERS “The only folks that [I] sat down and talked with… have *firsthand* knowledge of either a program or… firsthand knowledge of actually seeing something or touching something that to them was not explainable.” “There is something to this.”

Marik vR

131,544 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Steven Pinker (Steven Pinker) returns to Conversations with Tyler with an argument that common knowledge—those infinite loops of "I know that you know that I know"—is the hidden infrastructure that enables human coordination, from accepting paper money to toppling dictators. But tylercowen wonders: can there be too much common knowledge? COWEN: For a while now, we’ve had this thing called anonymous posters on the internet. Do you think, on average, they make the world better or worse? PINKER: Interesting. Probably worse. COWEN: They help make some things common knowledge. If there are things that are not common knowledge, some anonymous poster will say it. There’ll also be misinformation. Is that a clue that maybe at the margin, we have too much common knowledge rather than too little?
5:32

Steven Pinker (Steven Pinker) returns to Conversations with Tyler with an argument that common knowledge—those infinite loops of "I know that you know that I know"—is the hidden infrastructure that enables human coordination, from accepting paper money to toppling dictators. But tylercowen wonders: can there be too much common knowledge? COWEN: For a while now, we’ve had this thing called anonymous posters on the internet. Do you think, on average, they make the world better or worse? PINKER: Interesting. Probably worse. COWEN: They help make some things common knowledge. If there are things that are not common knowledge, some anonymous poster will say it. There’ll also be misinformation. Is that a clue that maybe at the margin, we have too much common knowledge rather than too little?

Conversations with Tyler

22,273 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

"Salience is the more common way that we entertain common knowledge, generated by certain common knowledge generators like direct speech, but also laughter, I argue, tears, blushing. We have nonverbal common knowledge generators and eye contact. With eye contact, you're looking at the part of the person that's looking at the part of you that's looking at the part of them, ad infinitum. Eye contact is a very powerful signal. Eye contact makes something that was private knowledge, common knowledge, which is why we and our primate ancestors are very sensitive to eye contact." Clip on common knowledge, the topic of my new book, from an interview with Robert Contofalsky (Robert Contofalsky) of R-Academy. -- When Everyone Knows That Everyone Knows . . .: Common Knowledge and the Mysteries of Money, Power, and Everyday Life:
0:40

"Salience is the more common way that we entertain common knowledge, generated by certain common knowledge generators like direct speech, but also laughter, I argue, tears, blushing. We have nonverbal common knowledge generators and eye contact. With eye contact, you're looking at the part of the person that's looking at the part of you that's looking at the part of them, ad infinitum. Eye contact is a very powerful signal. Eye contact makes something that was private knowledge, common knowledge, which is why we and our primate ancestors are very sensitive to eye contact." Clip on common knowledge, the topic of my new book, from an interview with Robert Contofalsky (Robert Contofalsky) of R-Academy. -- When Everyone Knows That Everyone Knows . . .: Common Knowledge and the Mysteries of Money, Power, and Everyday Life:

Steven Pinker

47,007 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

#unitytips We were shocked to learn that this is not common knowledge! Move an object into the view of your editor camera either from GameObject -> Move To View or the shortcut ctrl + alt + f. Spread the word! 😃 #gamedev #indiedev
0:22

#unitytips We were shocked to learn that this is not common knowledge! Move an object into the view of your editor camera either from GameObject -> Move To View or the shortcut ctrl + alt + f. Spread the word! 😃 #gamedev #indiedev

Binary Impact

47,784 просмотров • 1 год назад

Why don't we just cut the crap and say it? And the conclusion that I came to, this is an earlier book, The Stuff of Thought (subtitle is Language is a Window into Human Nature), is that direct speech generates common knowledge, and that common knowledge is the basis of our social relationships. Two people--if they're friends, if they're lovers, if they're transactional partners, if they're in a dominance hierarchy--all of those are equilibria in coordination games, and they're matters of common knowledge. In the case of friends, it's we're equal, we would do anything for each other, we're there for each other, and that's kind of the common knowledge that makes friends friends. Clip on direct speech and common knowledge from an interview with Robert Contofalsky (Robert Contofalsky) of R-Academy. -- My new book, When Everyone Knows That Everyone Knows . . .: Common Knowledge and the Mysteries of Money, Power, and Everyday Life is available here:
0:48

Why don't we just cut the crap and say it? And the conclusion that I came to, this is an earlier book, The Stuff of Thought (subtitle is Language is a Window into Human Nature), is that direct speech generates common knowledge, and that common knowledge is the basis of our social relationships. Two people--if they're friends, if they're lovers, if they're transactional partners, if they're in a dominance hierarchy--all of those are equilibria in coordination games, and they're matters of common knowledge. In the case of friends, it's we're equal, we would do anything for each other, we're there for each other, and that's kind of the common knowledge that makes friends friends. Clip on direct speech and common knowledge from an interview with Robert Contofalsky (Robert Contofalsky) of R-Academy. -- My new book, When Everyone Knows That Everyone Knows . . .: Common Knowledge and the Mysteries of Money, Power, and Everyday Life is available here:

Steven Pinker

56,084 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

BRENNAN: Are there classified annexes or portions of the MOU that have not been made public, and will they be shared with Congress? WALTZ: Not to my knowledge BRENNAN: What's the 'gentleman's agreement'? WALTZ: This is an ongoing negotiation
1:32

BRENNAN: Are there classified annexes or portions of the MOU that have not been made public, and will they be shared with Congress? WALTZ: Not to my knowledge BRENNAN: What's the 'gentleman's agreement'? WALTZ: This is an ongoing negotiation

Aaron Rupar

51,153 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Galen Druke (Galen Druke) interviewed me about common knowledge, the topic of my new book (link in thread): Me: What common knowledge does in informal interactions is it ratifies social relationships. So if two people are friends, if they’re lovers, if one of them is dominant and the other is subordinate—that is, one always gets it this way—these exist because each party knows the other one knows they exist. And they survive by being common knowledge. Sometimes we don’t want to destroy a relationship, and so we keep things out of common knowledge by using euphemism or innuendo or genteel hypocrisy. Druke: What’s an example of this? Me: At the end of a date, you’ve got a couple of friends and one says, “Hey, do you want to kind of come up for coffee—or Netflix and chill?” That’s very different from, “Do you want to have sex?” even though if they’re both grownups, they both know that it’s having sex. So there’s a denial of common knowledge, which would allow them—if the overture is not reciprocated—to go back to being platonic friends or workplace colleagues.
1:03

Galen Druke (Galen Druke) interviewed me about common knowledge, the topic of my new book (link in thread): Me: What common knowledge does in informal interactions is it ratifies social relationships. So if two people are friends, if they’re lovers, if one of them is dominant and the other is subordinate—that is, one always gets it this way—these exist because each party knows the other one knows they exist. And they survive by being common knowledge. Sometimes we don’t want to destroy a relationship, and so we keep things out of common knowledge by using euphemism or innuendo or genteel hypocrisy. Druke: What’s an example of this? Me: At the end of a date, you’ve got a couple of friends and one says, “Hey, do you want to kind of come up for coffee—or Netflix and chill?” That’s very different from, “Do you want to have sex?” even though if they’re both grownups, they both know that it’s having sex. So there’s a denial of common knowledge, which would allow them—if the overture is not reciprocated—to go back to being platonic friends or workplace colleagues.

Steven Pinker

22,350 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

3 Press Break Strategies That Flip the Script and Punish Full-Court Pressure They say pressure can bust pipes or make diamonds. It’s not different on the basketball court. -Mediocre teams panic when they get pressed. They lose their composure, leading to turnovers and bad shots. -Good teams are able to “handle” pressure. -The best teams are able to “beat” pressure. They see being pressed as an opportunity - an opportunity to attack and score. This video will help you become one of those teams! Whether you coach youth, high school, or college players, chances are you're going to see full-court pressure. When that moment comes, will your team panic… or attack? If you're looking to stop giving up live-ball turnovers and start scoring layups on the press, check out this video. 3 Game-Tested Press Breaks That Make The Press Pay! 1. Press Break #1: The “Bubble” Press Break From The Coaching System With Danny Miles 2. Press Break #2: 2-Up From The Youth Coaching System With Jim Huber 3. Press Break #3: Sideline Attack and the Power of the 45° Drive From Get Comfortable Playing At An Uncomfortable Pace With Rob Brost
17:35

3 Press Break Strategies That Flip the Script and Punish Full-Court Pressure They say pressure can bust pipes or make diamonds. It’s not different on the basketball court. -Mediocre teams panic when they get pressed. They lose their composure, leading to turnovers and bad shots. -Good teams are able to “handle” pressure. -The best teams are able to “beat” pressure. They see being pressed as an opportunity - an opportunity to attack and score. This video will help you become one of those teams! Whether you coach youth, high school, or college players, chances are you're going to see full-court pressure. When that moment comes, will your team panic… or attack? If you're looking to stop giving up live-ball turnovers and start scoring layups on the press, check out this video. 3 Game-Tested Press Breaks That Make The Press Pay! 1. Press Break #1: The “Bubble” Press Break From The Coaching System With Danny Miles 2. Press Break #2: 2-Up From The Youth Coaching System With Jim Huber 3. Press Break #3: Sideline Attack and the Power of the 45° Drive From Get Comfortable Playing At An Uncomfortable Pace With Rob Brost

Joe Haefner | Breakthrough Basketball

51,838 просмотров • 1 год назад

“Social media now allow any of us to be an executioner or a grand inquisitor—pile on—and our tweet shaming someone could go viral or cause other people to tweet. That can happen in academia, where you can gin up a petition denouncing someone in a few minutes with social media. I have a chapter in When Everyone Knows That Everyone Knows..., in particular on academic cancel culture—or cancel culture more generally—why people feel the urge to cancel, even in an arena like academia, which ought to be about ideas, including ideas that are advanced with the point that they be evaluated and falsified. And so you think that what you say might be wrong, but it surely can’t be evil. But in academia, there’s been a temptation to treat certain ideas as evil and to try to punish or censor the person broaching them.” Clip on common knowledge, the topic of my new book, from an interview with Robert Contofalsky (Robert Contofalsky) of R-Academy. -- When Everyone Knows That Everyone Knows . . .: Common Knowledge and the Mysteries of Money, Power, and Everyday Life:
1:08

“Social media now allow any of us to be an executioner or a grand inquisitor—pile on—and our tweet shaming someone could go viral or cause other people to tweet. That can happen in academia, where you can gin up a petition denouncing someone in a few minutes with social media. I have a chapter in When Everyone Knows That Everyone Knows..., in particular on academic cancel culture—or cancel culture more generally—why people feel the urge to cancel, even in an arena like academia, which ought to be about ideas, including ideas that are advanced with the point that they be evaluated and falsified. And so you think that what you say might be wrong, but it surely can’t be evil. But in academia, there’s been a temptation to treat certain ideas as evil and to try to punish or censor the person broaching them.” Clip on common knowledge, the topic of my new book, from an interview with Robert Contofalsky (Robert Contofalsky) of R-Academy. -- When Everyone Knows That Everyone Knows . . .: Common Knowledge and the Mysteries of Money, Power, and Everyday Life:

Steven Pinker

45,050 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Paul: Hegseth said he had no knowledge of this and it did not happen. And then the next day, from the podium at the white house, they're saying it did happen. So either he was lying to us on Sunday or he's incompetent
0:33

Paul: Hegseth said he had no knowledge of this and it did not happen. And then the next day, from the podium at the white house, they're saying it did happen. So either he was lying to us on Sunday or he's incompetent

Acyn

389,003 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

.David Deutsch: "Conventional pessimism is right that civilization has no guaranteed future, nor does our species. The overwhelming majority of civilizations and species that have ever existed are now extinct, including significantly every one of our cousin species, every species that has ever tried to survive by creating knowledge that was not in their genome. New explanatory knowledge, how to make clothes and fire and farming and to live the new ways of life that that enabled. That is our biological niche to survive through the exercise of creativity and we are the last species left in that niche. For such species, stasis is not available. We conquer problems by creating knowledge or they conquer us."
1:03

.David Deutsch: "Conventional pessimism is right that civilization has no guaranteed future, nor does our species. The overwhelming majority of civilizations and species that have ever existed are now extinct, including significantly every one of our cousin species, every species that has ever tried to survive by creating knowledge that was not in their genome. New explanatory knowledge, how to make clothes and fire and farming and to live the new ways of life that that enabled. That is our biological niche to survive through the exercise of creativity and we are the last species left in that niche. For such species, stasis is not available. We conquer problems by creating knowledge or they conquer us."

Deutsch Explains

14,422 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

🚨 JUST NOW: President Trump CONFIRMS America will get the Iranian nuclear dust and BANS Israel from bombing Lebanon "The U.S.A. will get all Nuclear “Dust,” created by our great B2 Bombers - No money will exchange hands in any way, shape, or form." "This deal is in no way subject to Lebanon, either, but the USA will, separately, work with Lebanon, and deal with the Hezboolah situation in an appropriate manner. Israel will not be bombing Lebanon any longer. They are PROHIBITED from doing so by the U.S.A. Enough is enough!!!"
0:31

🚨 JUST NOW: President Trump CONFIRMS America will get the Iranian nuclear dust and BANS Israel from bombing Lebanon "The U.S.A. will get all Nuclear “Dust,” created by our great B2 Bombers - No money will exchange hands in any way, shape, or form." "This deal is in no way subject to Lebanon, either, but the USA will, separately, work with Lebanon, and deal with the Hezboolah situation in an appropriate manner. Israel will not be bombing Lebanon any longer. They are PROHIBITED from doing so by the U.S.A. Enough is enough!!!"

Eric Daugherty

115,139 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

.David Deutsch: “There is an inherent conflict in the human condition—both individually and in society—between the need to preserve existing knowledge and the need to create new knowledge. For most of human history, preserving existing knowledge trumped any kind of attempt to improve knowledge. Because attempts to improve knowledge risk error. Or rather, to be exact, it risks error that has never occurred before. There were plenty of errors that had occurred before. Plenty of kings got overthrown because they couldn’t solve the problem of how to fend off the enemy. But they were in familiar territory conceptually, and they were afraid of changing culture. This fear of changing culture was built into culture itself. And this conflict exists to this day. The most extreme example known to me in the West, anyway, is the conflict in education between preserving existing knowledge and creating new knowledge. Even today, education—education theory—is conceived as the theory of how to decant existing knowledge from the brains that already know it to the brains that do not yet know it. And that’s what Popper calls the ‘bucket theory of the mind’—that the mind is a bucket and knowledge is a fluid. What he stressed, and what I always also want to stress, is that not only is that a mischaracterization of knowledge and of the use of knowledge, but it is the wrong way around. As a practical matter, even right back two million years ago, the transmission of cultural knowledge was not something done by the transmitter; it was something done by the receiver.”
2:29

.David Deutsch: “There is an inherent conflict in the human condition—both individually and in society—between the need to preserve existing knowledge and the need to create new knowledge. For most of human history, preserving existing knowledge trumped any kind of attempt to improve knowledge. Because attempts to improve knowledge risk error. Or rather, to be exact, it risks error that has never occurred before. There were plenty of errors that had occurred before. Plenty of kings got overthrown because they couldn’t solve the problem of how to fend off the enemy. But they were in familiar territory conceptually, and they were afraid of changing culture. This fear of changing culture was built into culture itself. And this conflict exists to this day. The most extreme example known to me in the West, anyway, is the conflict in education between preserving existing knowledge and creating new knowledge. Even today, education—education theory—is conceived as the theory of how to decant existing knowledge from the brains that already know it to the brains that do not yet know it. And that’s what Popper calls the ‘bucket theory of the mind’—that the mind is a bucket and knowledge is a fluid. What he stressed, and what I always also want to stress, is that not only is that a mischaracterization of knowledge and of the use of knowledge, but it is the wrong way around. As a practical matter, even right back two million years ago, the transmission of cultural knowledge was not something done by the transmitter; it was something done by the receiver.”

Arjun Khemani

10,523 просмотров • 1 год назад

He has spent years documenting the structural and geometric patterns that connect sacred sites across continents and millennia. From Gobekli Tepe, which predates recorded history by thousands of years, through medieval constructions, the same geometric principles and celestial alignments appear again and again. These are not coincidences or independent discoveries scattered across isolated cultures. The evidence points to a shared body of knowledge, a common understanding of proportion, orientation, and cosmic rhythm that was encoded into stone. The consistency is what demands explanation. When the same angular relationships and astronomical sight lines show up in structures separated by oceans and ages, it suggests either direct transmission of knowledge or inheritance from an earlier, more unified tradition. Either way, the implications challenge conventional timelines of human development and technological sophistication.
0:35

He has spent years documenting the structural and geometric patterns that connect sacred sites across continents and millennia. From Gobekli Tepe, which predates recorded history by thousands of years, through medieval constructions, the same geometric principles and celestial alignments appear again and again. These are not coincidences or independent discoveries scattered across isolated cultures. The evidence points to a shared body of knowledge, a common understanding of proportion, orientation, and cosmic rhythm that was encoded into stone. The consistency is what demands explanation. When the same angular relationships and astronomical sight lines show up in structures separated by oceans and ages, it suggests either direct transmission of knowledge or inheritance from an earlier, more unified tradition. Either way, the implications challenge conventional timelines of human development and technological sophistication.

Randall Carlson

20,474 просмотров • 15 дней назад

WHY THE NEW GENERATION RAP FANS HATE THE JAY Z FREESTYLE.. 1.) ITS NO BEAT 2.) IT’S TOO MANY WORDS 3.) THEY DON’T HAVE ENOUGH KNOWLEDGE ON THE HISTORY OF RAP TO UNDERSTAND NODS TO PUBLIC ENEMYS “911 IS A JOKE” 4.) ITS NO HOOK 5.) ITS NO AUTO TUNE OR HARMONIZING 6.) HE HAS NO JEWELRY OR DESIGNER CLOTHES ON See today’s casual rap fan does not really understand REAL HIP HOP They know HIP-POP a commercialized version of it That does not deal with knowledge And information through a lot of words from a rapper that make sense They are trained to listen to the beat Or the hook Or the autotune singing Or look at the outfit or the jewelry And since JAY Z WENT BACK TO THE ESSENCE OF WHAT THE ACTUAL ONLY SKILL ELEMENT OF HIP HOP IS “THE LYRICISM” Majority of the fans do not know what they are looking at Or even have the knowledge on how to listen to hip hop correctly enough to judge it properly
3:23

WHY THE NEW GENERATION RAP FANS HATE THE JAY Z FREESTYLE.. 1.) ITS NO BEAT 2.) IT’S TOO MANY WORDS 3.) THEY DON’T HAVE ENOUGH KNOWLEDGE ON THE HISTORY OF RAP TO UNDERSTAND NODS TO PUBLIC ENEMYS “911 IS A JOKE” 4.) ITS NO HOOK 5.) ITS NO AUTO TUNE OR HARMONIZING 6.) HE HAS NO JEWELRY OR DESIGNER CLOTHES ON See today’s casual rap fan does not really understand REAL HIP HOP They know HIP-POP a commercialized version of it That does not deal with knowledge And information through a lot of words from a rapper that make sense They are trained to listen to the beat Or the hook Or the autotune singing Or look at the outfit or the jewelry And since JAY Z WENT BACK TO THE ESSENCE OF WHAT THE ACTUAL ONLY SKILL ELEMENT OF HIP HOP IS “THE LYRICISM” Majority of the fans do not know what they are looking at Or even have the knowledge on how to listen to hip hop correctly enough to judge it properly

MASTER STUDENT🤲🏾

75,919 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Counterplay to Ingrid 👇 Covering counterplay to her corner > TC > OD Beam pressure, as well as weaknesses in her normal attacks 0:00- Corner > TC > OD Beam pressure After blocking OD Beam, Ingrid is +4 and within throw range, making this a very strong pressure sequence However, it can be interrupted with invincible reversals or parry If you land two perfect parries, you gain enough advantage to punish with options such as a back throw 0:24- Enhanced OD Beam is different, however Even after three perfect parries, you're still at a disadvantage You can interrupt with a DP or other invincible reversal, but be careful not to get baited by a back teleport 0:35- About Ingrid's normal attacks Overall, her normals tend to have relatively short range and are not especially strong in terms of hitbox priority generally matches up poorly against many characters' st.LP and often loses outright It is also vulnerable to preemptive buttons and can be beaten even when used as a whiff punish attempt 0:50- st.LP tends to lose to many characters' in hitbox interactions 0:56- cr.HP, and st.HP are all vulnerable to preemptive attacks, even from short-range buttons such as st.LP In addition, the whiff recovery of and cr.HP is large enough that even short-range buttons like st.LP can often whiff punish them The tip range of performs relatively well against preemptive st.LP, but if it whiffs, it can still be whiff punished by short-range buttons such as st.LP as well
1:35

Counterplay to Ingrid 👇 Covering counterplay to her corner > TC > OD Beam pressure, as well as weaknesses in her normal attacks 0:00- Corner > TC > OD Beam pressure After blocking OD Beam, Ingrid is +4 and within throw range, making this a very strong pressure sequence However, it can be interrupted with invincible reversals or parry If you land two perfect parries, you gain enough advantage to punish with options such as a back throw 0:24- Enhanced OD Beam is different, however Even after three perfect parries, you're still at a disadvantage You can interrupt with a DP or other invincible reversal, but be careful not to get baited by a back teleport 0:35- About Ingrid's normal attacks Overall, her normals tend to have relatively short range and are not especially strong in terms of hitbox priority generally matches up poorly against many characters' st.LP and often loses outright It is also vulnerable to preemptive buttons and can be beaten even when used as a whiff punish attempt 0:50- st.LP tends to lose to many characters' in hitbox interactions 0:56- cr.HP, and st.HP are all vulnerable to preemptive attacks, even from short-range buttons such as st.LP In addition, the whiff recovery of and cr.HP is large enough that even short-range buttons like st.LP can often whiff punish them The tip range of performs relatively well against preemptive st.LP, but if it whiffs, it can still be whiff punished by short-range buttons such as st.LP as well

白(ワラキア)

11,151 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt delivers a statement directly from President Trump on Iran and whether or not the United States will get directly involved: "Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks."
0:32

Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt delivers a statement directly from President Trump on Iran and whether or not the United States will get directly involved: "Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks."

Benny Johnson

88,268 просмотров • 1 год назад