Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

This man got rich on Wall Street by admitting he couldn't predict anything. Everyone else was forecasting the future. He bet they were all fooling themselves. Nassim Taleb started trading in the 80s and noticed something nobody wanted to hear: people are hopeless at randomness. They hit a lucky... streak and call it skill. They spot a shape in the noise and bet everything on it. So he flipped it. He stopped guessing and started buying the cheap bets everyone threw away - the ones that pay nothing for years, then pay a fortune the day the rare disaster hits. When the market broke, he was holding them. Picture two men leaving the same office, both rich. One is a dentist. The other just survived a round of Russian roulette. From the street you can't tell them apart. Only one gets to come back tomorrow. Telling those two apart is the whole point of Fooled by Randomness. He explains it himself in the clip.show more

Quantex

1,502 subscribers

65,812 görüntüleme • 17 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

This man went to a restaurant and ordered a bowl and a burrito. After he paid, they but both items in the same bag and handed it to him. The man takes the bag and takes a few steps and drops his food onto the floor. He claims they should have put each item in its own bag instead of bagging them together. He then takes both items that have touched the floor and puts it on the counter and wants them to remake it. They tell him the would only do so if he threw the items away, he refuses to throw it away himself and demands they give him his money back. Besides telling him to leave, should they have just thrown it away themselves and refunded him or did they refuse because he broke food safety guidelines by putting the dirty food on the counter?

This man went to a restaurant and ordered a bowl and a burrito. After he paid, they but both items in the same bag and handed it to him. The man takes the bag and takes a few steps and drops his food onto the floor. He claims they should have put each item in its own bag instead of bagging them together. He then takes both items that have touched the floor and puts it on the counter and wants them to remake it. They tell him the would only do so if he threw the items away, he refuses to throw it away himself and demands they give him his money back. Besides telling him to leave, should they have just thrown it away themselves and refunded him or did they refuse because he broke food safety guidelines by putting the dirty food on the counter?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

715,466 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Mr Anthony ,a very a brave police officer , around 3pm a whole street was r*bbed by 7 armed men and he was the only one on duty , they started exchanging bullets , to cut it short he got 6 of those heavy armed men down , one out of them escape and went to re-enforce 15 new squard ,still Mr Anthony didn’t run ,e protected all the civilians in that area and got another 15 armed men down ,they shut bazooka on the complex and they were ppl and baby’s in the complex ,he rescued everyone ,despite the heavy fire 🔥.God will continue to bless you sir

Mr Anthony ,a very a brave police officer , around 3pm a whole street was r*bbed by 7 armed men and he was the only one on duty , they started exchanging bullets , to cut it short he got 6 of those heavy armed men down , one out of them escape and went to re-enforce 15 new squard ,still Mr Anthony didn’t run ,e protected all the civilians in that area and got another 15 armed men down ,they shut bazooka on the complex and they were ppl and baby’s in the complex ,he rescued everyone ,despite the heavy fire 🔥.God will continue to bless you sir

Evadon

2,361,312 görüntüleme • 4 gün önce

Nassim Taleb, options trader and author of "The Black Swan": "Wall Street pays $500K for a five-year track record. I traded options for two decades and watched records like that vanish in a single afternoon." the article above is about telling a real edge from luck. taleb built his whole career and his books on one warning: a track record is the weakest evidence there is. a trader can win every single day for years and still be sitting on a hidden risk. the five good years don't prove skill, they just haven't met the one bad day yet. that is the entire "fooled by randomness" trap, dressed up as a resume. and you only ever see the survivors. for every rich trader with a spotless record, thousands ran the same reckless bet and quietly blew up. the graveyard is silent, so the lucky fool looks like a genius. none of this is new, taleb has said it for 25 years and the talk is free. same point as my article: a winning streak is not evidence. here is the edge, and it isn't a hot record. it's surviving. sizing so your one bad day can't erase you, and staying skeptical of your own success while everyone else worships theirs.

Nassim Taleb, options trader and author of "The Black Swan": "Wall Street pays $500K for a five-year track record. I traded options for two decades and watched records like that vanish in a single afternoon." the article above is about telling a real edge from luck. taleb built his whole career and his books on one warning: a track record is the weakest evidence there is. a trader can win every single day for years and still be sitting on a hidden risk. the five good years don't prove skill, they just haven't met the one bad day yet. that is the entire "fooled by randomness" trap, dressed up as a resume. and you only ever see the survivors. for every rich trader with a spotless record, thousands ran the same reckless bet and quietly blew up. the graveyard is silent, so the lucky fool looks like a genius. none of this is new, taleb has said it for 25 years and the talk is free. same point as my article: a winning streak is not evidence. here is the edge, and it isn't a hot record. it's surviving. sizing so your one bad day can't erase you, and staying skeptical of your own success while everyone else worships theirs.

Rossst.03

77,501 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

This gentleman works at a used car lot. He was evaluating a fresh trade and determined it needed tires and other services. He decided to take it to a local shop to have the work done. He dropped it off and got a call in the afternoon to pick it up. He paid for the services and when he got back to the dealer. He noticed that the shop didn’t do any of the work, they didn’t replace the tires or any of the services he paid for. He confronts one of the workers and they admit to scamming him, all the while the shop owner is nowhere to be found. The worker claims they were gonna call him back and fix it. At this point after they scammed you, would you allow them to try to do the work again and fix things?

This gentleman works at a used car lot. He was evaluating a fresh trade and determined it needed tires and other services. He decided to take it to a local shop to have the work done. He dropped it off and got a call in the afternoon to pick it up. He paid for the services and when he got back to the dealer. He noticed that the shop didn’t do any of the work, they didn’t replace the tires or any of the services he paid for. He confronts one of the workers and they admit to scamming him, all the while the shop owner is nowhere to be found. The worker claims they were gonna call him back and fix it. At this point after they scammed you, would you allow them to try to do the work again and fix things?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

175,544 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

before Nassim Taleb made his fortune shorting the 2008 collapse, an old veteran on the trading floor gave him a terrifying warning "he grabbed me, pointed to a guy across the room and said: 'you see ed over there? he made $7 million in 7 years... and he just lost it all in exactly 7 seconds'" that was the exact moment Taleb realized that 99% of wall street was playing a rigged game of russian roulette "average funds hide their risk to look smart - they make small, steady profits every single day, completely blind to the fact that one rare event will eventually wipe out their entire existence" "we do the exact opposite - we take tiny, calculated losses every day, and position our entire portfolio to make billions the second the system completely breaks" Taleb didn't build his empire by trying to predict the market. he built it by assuming everyone else is fragile, and waiting for the inevitable hurricane to destroy them watch his legendary stanford masterclass where he breaks down this exact realization

before Nassim Taleb made his fortune shorting the 2008 collapse, an old veteran on the trading floor gave him a terrifying warning "he grabbed me, pointed to a guy across the room and said: 'you see ed over there? he made $7 million in 7 years... and he just lost it all in exactly 7 seconds'" that was the exact moment Taleb realized that 99% of wall street was playing a rigged game of russian roulette "average funds hide their risk to look smart - they make small, steady profits every single day, completely blind to the fact that one rare event will eventually wipe out their entire existence" "we do the exact opposite - we take tiny, calculated losses every day, and position our entire portfolio to make billions the second the system completely breaks" Taleb didn't build his empire by trying to predict the market. he built it by assuming everyone else is fragile, and waiting for the inevitable hurricane to destroy them watch his legendary stanford masterclass where he breaks down this exact realization

ludoonchart

139,281 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

The reason North West is such a disaster, it was deliberately destroyed by the ANC because they wanted to erase the legacy of President Lucas Mangope. He loathed the ANC and warned everyone that they are a disaster waiting to happen. He had banned them in Bophuthatswana.

The reason North West is such a disaster, it was deliberately destroyed by the ANC because they wanted to erase the legacy of President Lucas Mangope. He loathed the ANC and warned everyone that they are a disaster waiting to happen. He had banned them in Bophuthatswana.

Sentletse 🇿🇦🇷🇺🇵🇸🇱🇧

142,126 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

This man lives across the street from a store where he frequents all the time. On this day he went in for a quick run. Immediately he was stopped by security asking him to leave and saying he was banned from the store. After they pressed the workers a little for more information and seeing the picture of the person, it was clear that they look nothing alike. They got the wrong person. They concerned him when it was three people circling him like a criminal. What would you do if you were falsely accused of theft and destruction of property, with this level of incompetence would you bother going back?

This man lives across the street from a store where he frequents all the time. On this day he went in for a quick run. Immediately he was stopped by security asking him to leave and saying he was banned from the store. After they pressed the workers a little for more information and seeing the picture of the person, it was clear that they look nothing alike. They got the wrong person. They concerned him when it was three people circling him like a criminal. What would you do if you were falsely accused of theft and destruction of property, with this level of incompetence would you bother going back?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

414,937 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

These two guys were on their way to their fishing spot. They came to a stop sign at the same time as this bicyclist and blew through his stop sign and didn’t stop. When the men passed him they yelled at him for not stopping. So this guy followed them to their fishing spot. The two men exchange pleasantries and the guy on the bike tells them he never stops and they shouldn’t be yelling at him or anyone. The one man tells him he is just like everyone else and he has to obey the traffic laws. At one point the guy on the bike tells the two men he can take them both in a fight. The one man walks off to go fishing. 😳 The guy on the bike does not have the right of way. Bicyclists are like automobiles and must follow all traffic laws. Biker fatigue is real. 💯 So who do you side with? Who is the real moron? 🤔

These two guys were on their way to their fishing spot. They came to a stop sign at the same time as this bicyclist and blew through his stop sign and didn’t stop. When the men passed him they yelled at him for not stopping. So this guy followed them to their fishing spot. The two men exchange pleasantries and the guy on the bike tells them he never stops and they shouldn’t be yelling at him or anyone. The one man tells him he is just like everyone else and he has to obey the traffic laws. At one point the guy on the bike tells the two men he can take them both in a fight. The one man walks off to go fishing. 😳 The guy on the bike does not have the right of way. Bicyclists are like automobiles and must follow all traffic laws. Biker fatigue is real. 💯 So who do you side with? Who is the real moron? 🤔

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

24,320 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

In 1950 a scientist at Bell Labs admitted, out loud, that he was envious of the geniuses in the offices around him. He was sharing an attic with Claude Shannon. So instead of resenting them, he spent the rest of his career studying exactly what separated the great ones from everyone else, and near the end of his life he laid the whole answer out in a single talk. His name was Richard Hamming. He was honest about where he started. At Los Alamos, he called himself a janitor of science, one of the people who kept things running while the important decisions happened without him. He was, in his own words, plain envious. And rather than swallow it, he turned it into a question. What actually is the difference between the first-class people and the rest of us? His first answer is uncomfortable, because it removes every excuse. It is not luck, though luck plays a part. It is not raw IQ, since plenty of the greats did not test especially well, and Einstein spent seven years in a patent office before anyone noticed him. What it comes down to, again and again, is that the able people simply work on important problems, and they work on them relentlessly, while everyone else stays busy with whatever happens to be in front of them. Then he tells the story that stays with you. For years he ate lunch with the physicists, the Nobel winners, and learned how they thought. One day he turned to a chemist at the table and asked, if what you are working on is not important, and not likely to lead to anything important, why are you working on it? The man was offended. But months later he stopped Hamming in the hallway and admitted the question had gotten under his skin. That chemist went on to run his department and join the National Academy. Of everyone else at that table, Hamming says, he never heard of a single one again. He noticed the same pattern in something as small as an office door. The people who worked with their doors closed got more done in the moment, but ten years later they no longer knew what was worth doing. The ones who left their doors open stayed connected to what actually mattered, even at the cost of constant interruption. And underneath all of it was a habit most people never build. He set aside Friday afternoons, every week, for nothing but great thoughts. No task, no email, just the question of what the important problems in his field really were, and whether he was working on any of them. He was not claiming to be the smartest man in the building. He knew he was not. That was the entire point. He watched the smartest men closely, took what he could use, and made himself into someone who did work that lasted. As he put it near the end, no one ever told him these things. He had to find them alone. You have no such excuse.

In 1950 a scientist at Bell Labs admitted, out loud, that he was envious of the geniuses in the offices around him. He was sharing an attic with Claude Shannon. So instead of resenting them, he spent the rest of his career studying exactly what separated the great ones from everyone else, and near the end of his life he laid the whole answer out in a single talk. His name was Richard Hamming. He was honest about where he started. At Los Alamos, he called himself a janitor of science, one of the people who kept things running while the important decisions happened without him. He was, in his own words, plain envious. And rather than swallow it, he turned it into a question. What actually is the difference between the first-class people and the rest of us? His first answer is uncomfortable, because it removes every excuse. It is not luck, though luck plays a part. It is not raw IQ, since plenty of the greats did not test especially well, and Einstein spent seven years in a patent office before anyone noticed him. What it comes down to, again and again, is that the able people simply work on important problems, and they work on them relentlessly, while everyone else stays busy with whatever happens to be in front of them. Then he tells the story that stays with you. For years he ate lunch with the physicists, the Nobel winners, and learned how they thought. One day he turned to a chemist at the table and asked, if what you are working on is not important, and not likely to lead to anything important, why are you working on it? The man was offended. But months later he stopped Hamming in the hallway and admitted the question had gotten under his skin. That chemist went on to run his department and join the National Academy. Of everyone else at that table, Hamming says, he never heard of a single one again. He noticed the same pattern in something as small as an office door. The people who worked with their doors closed got more done in the moment, but ten years later they no longer knew what was worth doing. The ones who left their doors open stayed connected to what actually mattered, even at the cost of constant interruption. And underneath all of it was a habit most people never build. He set aside Friday afternoons, every week, for nothing but great thoughts. No task, no email, just the question of what the important problems in his field really were, and whether he was working on any of them. He was not claiming to be the smartest man in the building. He knew he was not. That was the entire point. He watched the smartest men closely, took what he could use, and made himself into someone who did work that lasted. As he put it near the end, no one ever told him these things. He had to find them alone. You have no such excuse.

Zyron

15,886 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

A hedge fund returned over 4,000 percent in a single month during the COVID crash. It made no calls. It held the same tail-risk position it had held for 13 years. The strategy was designed by a former options trader who wrote three books arguing that almost every Wall Street success is luck. His argument has not changed since 2001. Wall Street still has not read it. The trader is Nassim Taleb. The fund is Universa. Their entire business model is losing small amounts of money on 99 percent of days in order to make catastrophic amounts on the 1 percent day everyone else is dying. Taleb learned the trade himself in October 1987. He was 27, long thousands of out-of-the-money puts nobody else wanted. When the Dow fell 22.6 percent on Black Monday, those puts paid a hundred times their cost. He walked away rich enough to never need a paycheck again. He has said publicly that the entire arc of his career was paid for on a single afternoon. He drew the wrong conclusion from it. Instead of writing "How I Beat Wall Street," he wrote "Fooled by Randomness" in 2001. The thesis: most traders who look brilliant are lucky, and the ones who blow up are the ones who confused a streak with a skill. Six years later, "The Black Swan" hit shelves in April 2007. It described the mechanism of a credit-driven collapse in plain English. Fifteen months later, Lehman went bankrupt exactly as described. Wall Street bought half a million copies. Not one desk changed how it sized risk. In 2012 came "Antifragile." His Stanford talk on it is on YouTube. 45 minutes. Some systems break under stress. Some hold. A rare few grow stronger. Muscles. Immune systems. Options portfolios. The trader who sizes small and holds long-tail exposure gains from the same crashes that kill everyone else. His most repeated line from Fooled by Randomness, printed 24 years ago: "Mild success can be explainable by skills and labor. Wild success is attributable to variance." That sentence is the whole book. It is also the exact argument in Rossst's article on telling a real edge from luck. The idea is not new. Taleb wrote it in 2001. Rossst wrote it again this week because nobody listened the first time. He wrote it in 2001. Rossst wrote it in 2026. Somebody will write it again in 2049.

A hedge fund returned over 4,000 percent in a single month during the COVID crash. It made no calls. It held the same tail-risk position it had held for 13 years. The strategy was designed by a former options trader who wrote three books arguing that almost every Wall Street success is luck. His argument has not changed since 2001. Wall Street still has not read it. The trader is Nassim Taleb. The fund is Universa. Their entire business model is losing small amounts of money on 99 percent of days in order to make catastrophic amounts on the 1 percent day everyone else is dying. Taleb learned the trade himself in October 1987. He was 27, long thousands of out-of-the-money puts nobody else wanted. When the Dow fell 22.6 percent on Black Monday, those puts paid a hundred times their cost. He walked away rich enough to never need a paycheck again. He has said publicly that the entire arc of his career was paid for on a single afternoon. He drew the wrong conclusion from it. Instead of writing "How I Beat Wall Street," he wrote "Fooled by Randomness" in 2001. The thesis: most traders who look brilliant are lucky, and the ones who blow up are the ones who confused a streak with a skill. Six years later, "The Black Swan" hit shelves in April 2007. It described the mechanism of a credit-driven collapse in plain English. Fifteen months later, Lehman went bankrupt exactly as described. Wall Street bought half a million copies. Not one desk changed how it sized risk. In 2012 came "Antifragile." His Stanford talk on it is on YouTube. 45 minutes. Some systems break under stress. Some hold. A rare few grow stronger. Muscles. Immune systems. Options portfolios. The trader who sizes small and holds long-tail exposure gains from the same crashes that kill everyone else. His most repeated line from Fooled by Randomness, printed 24 years ago: "Mild success can be explainable by skills and labor. Wild success is attributable to variance." That sentence is the whole book. It is also the exact argument in Rossst's article on telling a real edge from luck. The idea is not new. Taleb wrote it in 2001. Rossst wrote it again this week because nobody listened the first time. He wrote it in 2001. Rossst wrote it in 2026. Somebody will write it again in 2049.

Veles

11,602 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

PAUL TUDOR JONES WENT ON LIVE TV DURING THE 1987 CRASH AND CALLED EXACTLY WHAT WAS HAPPENING The Dow dropped 22% in a single day. The NYSE tape was delayed over 2 hours. Wall Street was in full panic. Jones had been trading it for two weeks. “The market is doing exactly what it always does: fooling 99.9% of people. Wall Street was uniformly unprepared for this magnitude of a drop. And of course that’s why you got it, because that is the nature of the market.” His advice to investors that day: “Everyone needs to get their house in order. Be prudent. Be conservative. Cut back on whatever speculative investments they have. The next few years will be a period of preservation.” He predicted the crash. He traded it. Then he went on TV and told everyone exactly what to do next.

PAUL TUDOR JONES WENT ON LIVE TV DURING THE 1987 CRASH AND CALLED EXACTLY WHAT WAS HAPPENING The Dow dropped 22% in a single day. The NYSE tape was delayed over 2 hours. Wall Street was in full panic. Jones had been trading it for two weeks. “The market is doing exactly what it always does: fooling 99.9% of people. Wall Street was uniformly unprepared for this magnitude of a drop. And of course that’s why you got it, because that is the nature of the market.” His advice to investors that day: “Everyone needs to get their house in order. Be prudent. Be conservative. Cut back on whatever speculative investments they have. The next few years will be a period of preservation.” He predicted the crash. He traded it. Then he went on TV and told everyone exactly what to do next.

WOLF

236,462 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Trump: This is something they called me up from Wall Street. The most brilliant people they call me up had it. Where do you think of that? Sounds simple, right. But it's not so simple. I always say it's like the paper clip, you know, some guy 129 years ago, he came up, he took a little piece of stuff and he went away all of a sudden he is the paper clip. He made a fortune, people look at it, they say why didn't I think of that? This is the same thing (???)

Trump: This is something they called me up from Wall Street. The most brilliant people they call me up had it. Where do you think of that? Sounds simple, right. But it's not so simple. I always say it's like the paper clip, you know, some guy 129 years ago, he came up, he took a little piece of stuff and he went away all of a sudden he is the paper clip. He made a fortune, people look at it, they say why didn't I think of that? This is the same thing (???)

Headquarters

370,831 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Did Proctor just admit to a dirty investigation? Last night on 20/20, Proctor said the moment he knew John was hit by Karen's SUV was at the hospital when he saw that John only had on one shoe. He knows from experience that if the other shoe is on the street, that is likely the point of impact, meaning he was hit by a car on the street. The problem with that statement is that Michael Proctor went to the hospital to see John at 1pm. At that time, he had not yet visited the crime scene. He had no idea where the other shoe was, and for all he knew, the shoe was inside the house. He then had Karen's SUV towed from Dighton at 4:30pm. The other shoe wasn't found on the street until 6pm by the SERT team. So, he knew at 1pm that at 6 pm, they would find the other shoe on the street, amd he should have Karen's SUV towed an hour and a half earlier so they have the vehicle in custody??? OK, got it.

Did Proctor just admit to a dirty investigation? Last night on 20/20, Proctor said the moment he knew John was hit by Karen's SUV was at the hospital when he saw that John only had on one shoe. He knows from experience that if the other shoe is on the street, that is likely the point of impact, meaning he was hit by a car on the street. The problem with that statement is that Michael Proctor went to the hospital to see John at 1pm. At that time, he had not yet visited the crime scene. He had no idea where the other shoe was, and for all he knew, the shoe was inside the house. He then had Karen's SUV towed from Dighton at 4:30pm. The other shoe wasn't found on the street until 6pm by the SERT team. So, he knew at 1pm that at 6 pm, they would find the other shoe on the street, amd he should have Karen's SUV towed an hour and a half earlier so they have the vehicle in custody??? OK, got it.

TinyElvis

121,320 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Jensen Huang was 40 in 2003 and held 25% of a $10 billion market. Someone asked him how he spends his time. “Not sleeping is a good choice. It creates more time when you don’t sleep.” He walks into the office and tells his admin to wipe the calendar, because a CEO’s day belongs to everyone else and he takes it back by force. Then he goes and finds customers, not to sell them anything but to ask what NVIDIA is getting wrong. The rest of it he spends in the cafeteria at lunch and dinner, and people kept telling him it was strange for a CEO to eat with everyone. He said you can’t set a culture through CNN or a magazine profile, so it moves 1 person at a time. Then the question turned to competition and he named Intel, Sony, and ATI in Canada. And then he said the obvious ones were not the problem. The company that would hurt NVIDIA was still sitting in a classroom, in ideas nobody had found yet, in a change in what people care about. 9 years later 2 grad students trained AlexNet on 2 GTX 580 gaming cards and dropped the ImageNet error rate to 15.3%. Both of them were in school in 2003. They didn’t kill NVIDIA they turned it into a $4 trillion company. He guessed right about the students and wrong about the side.

West Lord

285,497 görüntüleme • 24 gün önce

A man who has made 19% a year for forty-five years spent most of them telling people Warren Buffett was just lucky. Then he listened to a podcast and apologised on air. "Wow, this guy is a genius, and I've been the biggest fool all along." That is Paul Tudor Jones. His original argument was never stupid, which is the part worth staying for. Buffett, he thought, was in the right place at the right time, riding the longest bull market in history. Put the same man in Japan starting in 1989 and see how well the genius holds up. It is a real objection. The Nikkei peaked in December 1989 and did not get back there until February 2024. Thirty-four years underwater. Buy and hold would have ruined you. He changed his mind anyway. He now calls Buffett the OG of compound interest, and then he says the line that should stop you. "He understood the power of compound interest at age nine, while I brilliantly avoided it throughout my entire career." That is not a man who failed at anything. So what exactly did he avoid? Selling. Run the same 19% two ways. Hold everything and pay capital gains once at the end, and forty years turns a dollar into 842. Realise your gains every year and pay tax as you go, and the same 19% turns a dollar into 287. Identical returns. Roughly three times the money, purely from not touching it. That is the price of being right often instead of being right once and then waiting. And here is what makes this honest rather than a lecture. Jones knows all of it now and still cannot do it. He says plainly he could not sit through a 50% drawdown, that his own wiring will not permit it. He wondered aloud why he couldn't just believe in America and ride it out. He can't. Fifty years of reflexes do not get argued away by arithmetic. So the lesson is not to go and be Buffett. It is to work out which one you actually are before the market tells you, because the two strategies are not interchangeable and neither are the people who run them. He is 71. He apologised to a man he had doubted for decades, and then admitted he would probably do it the same way again.

A man who has made 19% a year for forty-five years spent most of them telling people Warren Buffett was just lucky. Then he listened to a podcast and apologised on air. "Wow, this guy is a genius, and I've been the biggest fool all along." That is Paul Tudor Jones. His original argument was never stupid, which is the part worth staying for. Buffett, he thought, was in the right place at the right time, riding the longest bull market in history. Put the same man in Japan starting in 1989 and see how well the genius holds up. It is a real objection. The Nikkei peaked in December 1989 and did not get back there until February 2024. Thirty-four years underwater. Buy and hold would have ruined you. He changed his mind anyway. He now calls Buffett the OG of compound interest, and then he says the line that should stop you. "He understood the power of compound interest at age nine, while I brilliantly avoided it throughout my entire career." That is not a man who failed at anything. So what exactly did he avoid? Selling. Run the same 19% two ways. Hold everything and pay capital gains once at the end, and forty years turns a dollar into 842. Realise your gains every year and pay tax as you go, and the same 19% turns a dollar into 287. Identical returns. Roughly three times the money, purely from not touching it. That is the price of being right often instead of being right once and then waiting. And here is what makes this honest rather than a lecture. Jones knows all of it now and still cannot do it. He says plainly he could not sit through a 50% drawdown, that his own wiring will not permit it. He wondered aloud why he couldn't just believe in America and ride it out. He can't. Fifty years of reflexes do not get argued away by arithmetic. So the lesson is not to go and be Buffett. It is to work out which one you actually are before the market tells you, because the two strategies are not interchangeable and neither are the people who run them. He is 71. He apologised to a man he had doubted for decades, and then admitted he would probably do it the same way again.

Veles

48,073 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

BOOM! I LEFT MAGA: Finally, a lady on a pro-Trump live asked him: “Are there a couple of big reasons in your mind that you didn’t like?” He looked at the camera and said: “Well, I like to paraphrase the late Ernest Hemingway in saying that my epiphany happened gradually and then suddenly all at once. And there were several reasons that led me to eventually leave.” Then this ultra-MAGA guy detonated truth bombs that are breaking the internet. He was a Republican his whole life. When Trump took office in 2016, he went full MAGA—never blinked. Then he started listening to both sides. He said: “I realized I’ve been lied to. All you have to do is open your eyes and see both sides, and it quickly dawns on you. A lot of people just don’t want to hear the truth. They don’t want to face the fact that they’ve been lied to this whole time. Who wants to be the dummy?” He used to think Jan. 6 was “overplayed.” He thought Proud Boys and Oath Keepers were political prisoners. Then he saw the court docket. Trump’s own lawyers never argued it wasn’t real—they argued he should be immune because he was president. They admitted it happened. They just said he shouldn’t be held accountable. And MAGA was still screaming “it was a setup.” He said: “I couldn’t go along with that.” Then one night, lying in bed, he put two and two together. He said: “It’s right there. You have to purposely not want to believe it.” He realized Democrats aren’t demons. Republicans aren’t fiscally responsible—they’re the ones burning cash while blaming everyone else. He said the fear was so loud it blinded him to the fact they delivered nothing. MAGA will call him a RINO. But that’s just because you can’t handle a man who got tired of being lied to. The truth is quiet. But once you hear it, you can’t unhear it. Welcome back to reality.

BOOM! I LEFT MAGA: Finally, a lady on a pro-Trump live asked him: “Are there a couple of big reasons in your mind that you didn’t like?” He looked at the camera and said: “Well, I like to paraphrase the late Ernest Hemingway in saying that my epiphany happened gradually and then suddenly all at once. And there were several reasons that led me to eventually leave.” Then this ultra-MAGA guy detonated truth bombs that are breaking the internet. He was a Republican his whole life. When Trump took office in 2016, he went full MAGA—never blinked. Then he started listening to both sides. He said: “I realized I’ve been lied to. All you have to do is open your eyes and see both sides, and it quickly dawns on you. A lot of people just don’t want to hear the truth. They don’t want to face the fact that they’ve been lied to this whole time. Who wants to be the dummy?” He used to think Jan. 6 was “overplayed.” He thought Proud Boys and Oath Keepers were political prisoners. Then he saw the court docket. Trump’s own lawyers never argued it wasn’t real—they argued he should be immune because he was president. They admitted it happened. They just said he shouldn’t be held accountable. And MAGA was still screaming “it was a setup.” He said: “I couldn’t go along with that.” Then one night, lying in bed, he put two and two together. He said: “It’s right there. You have to purposely not want to believe it.” He realized Democrats aren’t demons. Republicans aren’t fiscally responsible—they’re the ones burning cash while blaming everyone else. He said the fear was so loud it blinded him to the fact they delivered nothing. MAGA will call him a RINO. But that’s just because you can’t handle a man who got tired of being lied to. The truth is quiet. But once you hear it, you can’t unhear it. Welcome back to reality.

Popular Liberal 🇺🇸

300,128 görüntüleme • 22 gün önce

I recount a joke from the old Soviet Union: a man handing out leaflets in Red Square. Of course, the KGB arrested him and bring him back to headquarters. Only they discover the leaflets are blank sheets of paper. They confront him: "What is the meaning of this?" He says, “What’s there to say? It’s so obvious.” So the point of the joke was, he was generating subversive common knowledge. That is, the citizens of the Soviet Union, they all knew that the regime was inefficient and cruel and oppressive, but each one may have thought that they were the only one, that everyone else was happy. Or they may even have thought that everyone else was aggrieved the way they are, but they didn’t know that everyone else was. And so everyone just kept their misery to themselves. By just making it public, making it common knowledge that there’s a reason to oppose the regime, that can unite people in opposition and can really bring down a regime. Thinkable

I recount a joke from the old Soviet Union: a man handing out leaflets in Red Square. Of course, the KGB arrested him and bring him back to headquarters. Only they discover the leaflets are blank sheets of paper. They confront him: "What is the meaning of this?" He says, “What’s there to say? It’s so obvious.” So the point of the joke was, he was generating subversive common knowledge. That is, the citizens of the Soviet Union, they all knew that the regime was inefficient and cruel and oppressive, but each one may have thought that they were the only one, that everyone else was happy. Or they may even have thought that everyone else was aggrieved the way they are, but they didn’t know that everyone else was. And so everyone just kept their misery to themselves. By just making it public, making it common knowledge that there’s a reason to oppose the regime, that can unite people in opposition and can really bring down a regime. Thinkable

Steven Pinker

70,152 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

A little puppy that saved everyone. He barked nonstop when it started raining and woke the whole family. They shifted to another house and tied him at a safer spot. Still he got washed away in the floods. But by God’s grace, he was found later without a single scratch.

Sensitive content

A little puppy that saved everyone. He barked nonstop when it started raining and woke the whole family. They shifted to another house and tied him at a safer spot. Still he got washed away in the floods. But by God’s grace, he was found later without a single scratch.

Nikhil saini

148,442 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

A man joined went to his daughter’s birthday dinner, when it was time to pay, her feminist friends are now crying that he wants to only pay got his family including himself, daughter and his wife and should pay the whole $700 bill because he is the only man at the table. They are now attacking him and calling him cheap and ghetto. As the only man at the table, is it automatically his responsibility to pay or are his daughter’s friends the ones being cheap?

A man joined went to his daughter’s birthday dinner, when it was time to pay, her feminist friends are now crying that he wants to only pay got his family including himself, daughter and his wife and should pay the whole $700 bill because he is the only man at the table. They are now attacking him and calling him cheap and ghetto. As the only man at the table, is it automatically his responsibility to pay or are his daughter’s friends the ones being cheap?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

1,741,137 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Ten years. A marriage, a home, a life built brick by brick, until one night, everything cracked. He wasn’t even looking for it when he found the Tinder account. Same photos. Same smile. Same woman he thought he knew. At first, he tried to explain it away… but the truth kept staring back at him. And then he noticed something worse, the location. Close. Too close. His heart pounding, he drove a few houses down. Knocked on the door of the neighbor he never suspected. When the door opened, it wasn’t the man. it was his wife. And in that moment, he made a decision that would change everything. He told her. Everything. The messages. The account. The betrayal. You could see it hit her in real time, confusion, disbelief… then realization. Two lives shattered in one conversation. Betrayal doesn’t just break one relationship. it creates a ripple that destroys everything around it. If you found out something like this… would you confront quietly, or expose the truth no matter who it affects?

Ten years. A marriage, a home, a life built brick by brick, until one night, everything cracked. He wasn’t even looking for it when he found the Tinder account. Same photos. Same smile. Same woman he thought he knew. At first, he tried to explain it away… but the truth kept staring back at him. And then he noticed something worse, the location. Close. Too close. His heart pounding, he drove a few houses down. Knocked on the door of the neighbor he never suspected. When the door opened, it wasn’t the man. it was his wife. And in that moment, he made a decision that would change everything. He told her. Everything. The messages. The account. The betrayal. You could see it hit her in real time, confusion, disbelief… then realization. Two lives shattered in one conversation. Betrayal doesn’t just break one relationship. it creates a ripple that destroys everything around it. If you found out something like this… would you confront quietly, or expose the truth no matter who it affects?

Dr. CZ

90,357 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce