Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

This manipulative ploy to introduce third-party culprits into the wrongful death suit is a clear sign of Alan Jackson’s desperation and deceit. Judge Daniel O’Shea, known for his no-nonsense approach, had already reprimanded Killer Karen’s defense team for not disclosing this information with the O’Keefe legal team ahead of...

zonaeagle's profile picture

Zona Eagle

1,313 subscribers

15,811 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Judge Jeanine Pirro confuses bonds for criminal cases with a penalty in a civil case. Trump is not being criminally charged in the civil trial case. The amount he had to put up is not a bond to keep him out of prison. This is embarrassing for a lawyer and former judge.
0:48

Judge Jeanine Pirro confuses bonds for criminal cases with a penalty in a civil case. Trump is not being criminally charged in the civil trial case. The amount he had to put up is not a bond to keep him out of prison. This is embarrassing for a lawyer and former judge.

Decoding Fox News

688,788 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

This is one of the most misunderstood aspects of the MJ case. Michael settled a CIVIL case, which had no impact on the criminal one. The investigation continued and a trial would have taken place if his accusers had testified or if evidence had been found for the state to indict him. The accusers had the opportunity to BOTH receive money and pursue criminal charges, but chose not to. He settled the civil case because it was scheduled before the criminal one, which violated his Fifth Amendment rights. The Chandlers admitted in their book that they intentionally created this situation to pressure him into settling. Regardless, this is not relevant to the criminal case itself.
5:44

This is one of the most misunderstood aspects of the MJ case. Michael settled a CIVIL case, which had no impact on the criminal one. The investigation continued and a trial would have taken place if his accusers had testified or if evidence had been found for the state to indict him. The accusers had the opportunity to BOTH receive money and pursue criminal charges, but chose not to. He settled the civil case because it was scheduled before the criminal one, which violated his Fifth Amendment rights. The Chandlers admitted in their book that they intentionally created this situation to pressure him into settling. Regardless, this is not relevant to the criminal case itself.

vi ☆

66,326 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

The defense introduced a flow chart yesterday at trial that vastly simplified & clarified the otherwise impossible to follow evidence for the jury. It made clear exactly what evidence was planted as it related to the mismatched sources of broken glass. The Commonwealth kept this from the jury at the first trial, however, because their entire approach has been to baffle with BS, and muddy the waters on things no prosecutor ever questions, like Cellebrite, for instance. Here, the defense put together a visual aid for jurors to understand the origins and discovery of multiple pieces of evidence found at the scene and on Karen Read’s bumper. The Commonwealth, however, would rather refer to these pieces of evidence by different numbers because this of course makes it harder for anyone to realize that one category of evidence doesn’t fit, signifying it was therefore planted. By referring to them as nondescript numbers, the Commonwealth was able to obfuscate the truth from the jury. I remember at the first trial seeing this flow chart—now a demonstrative successfully admitted into evidence this time around—in Attorney Alan Jackson’s binder as he conducted his cross examination of lab tech Christina Hanley, and thinking how helpful it would’ve been for the jurors to clearly understand that evidence (picture attached below). As you may recall, the Commonwealth objected to the admission of the flowchart into evidence at the first trial because they want to keep the truth from the jury. And they were successful. In a one-on-one interview after the first trial with journalist Ted Daniel, Karen Read explains the frustration surrounding this evidence and trying to get this exhibit admitted to better assist the jury in their understanding of it. Finally, this time around, the defense was successful in getting more truth through to the jury. #KarenRead #HankBrennan #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #KarenReadRetrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe
1:37

The defense introduced a flow chart yesterday at trial that vastly simplified & clarified the otherwise impossible to follow evidence for the jury. It made clear exactly what evidence was planted as it related to the mismatched sources of broken glass. The Commonwealth kept this from the jury at the first trial, however, because their entire approach has been to baffle with BS, and muddy the waters on things no prosecutor ever questions, like Cellebrite, for instance. Here, the defense put together a visual aid for jurors to understand the origins and discovery of multiple pieces of evidence found at the scene and on Karen Read’s bumper. The Commonwealth, however, would rather refer to these pieces of evidence by different numbers because this of course makes it harder for anyone to realize that one category of evidence doesn’t fit, signifying it was therefore planted. By referring to them as nondescript numbers, the Commonwealth was able to obfuscate the truth from the jury. I remember at the first trial seeing this flow chart—now a demonstrative successfully admitted into evidence this time around—in Attorney Alan Jackson’s binder as he conducted his cross examination of lab tech Christina Hanley, and thinking how helpful it would’ve been for the jurors to clearly understand that evidence (picture attached below). As you may recall, the Commonwealth objected to the admission of the flowchart into evidence at the first trial because they want to keep the truth from the jury. And they were successful. In a one-on-one interview after the first trial with journalist Ted Daniel, Karen Read explains the frustration surrounding this evidence and trying to get this exhibit admitted to better assist the jury in their understanding of it. Finally, this time around, the defense was successful in getting more truth through to the jury. #KarenRead #HankBrennan #FreeKarenRead #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #KarenReadRetrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Olivia

45,341 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

BREAKING NEWS🚨🚨🚨: There will be a full-day voir dire of Karen Read trial defense experts from ARCCA on Friday April, 25, 2025 related to what Judge Cannone has just found was another blatant violation of discovery obligations and court orders by Read's defense. A court order compelling ARCCA to bring with them all such documents, including any further communications, payments or otherwise related to Read's defense team, ahead of Friday's hearing. This voir dire was not initially supposed to happen until mid-trial, right before ARCCA testified during Read's defense presentation of evidence. However, this morning, just minutes before opening arguments began in Read's re-trial as to the death of John O'Keefe, Judge Cannone banned Alan Jackson from mentioning ARCCS in his opening due to Read's defense turning over a list of 100 text messages, without their content, to prosecutor Hank Brennan over the weekend (in violation of Judge Cannone's order from last week requiring the content of those messages to be turned over). It may well be that Karen Read is heading towards a calamitous reckoning, and the loss of ARCCA from her already meager and humiliating witness list, on Friday! Earlier, Read's lawyer Bob Alessi was screaming at Judge Cannone during a motion hearing after the first day of opening arguments and evidence in Read's re-trial. It did not go well for Alessi, and the shocking Friday voir dire stunned Read's defense team into silence as court ended for the day around 4:20pm ET.
3:21

BREAKING NEWS🚨🚨🚨: There will be a full-day voir dire of Karen Read trial defense experts from ARCCA on Friday April, 25, 2025 related to what Judge Cannone has just found was another blatant violation of discovery obligations and court orders by Read's defense. A court order compelling ARCCA to bring with them all such documents, including any further communications, payments or otherwise related to Read's defense team, ahead of Friday's hearing. This voir dire was not initially supposed to happen until mid-trial, right before ARCCA testified during Read's defense presentation of evidence. However, this morning, just minutes before opening arguments began in Read's re-trial as to the death of John O'Keefe, Judge Cannone banned Alan Jackson from mentioning ARCCS in his opening due to Read's defense turning over a list of 100 text messages, without their content, to prosecutor Hank Brennan over the weekend (in violation of Judge Cannone's order from last week requiring the content of those messages to be turned over). It may well be that Karen Read is heading towards a calamitous reckoning, and the loss of ARCCA from her already meager and humiliating witness list, on Friday! Earlier, Read's lawyer Bob Alessi was screaming at Judge Cannone during a motion hearing after the first day of opening arguments and evidence in Read's re-trial. It did not go well for Alessi, and the shocking Friday voir dire stunned Read's defense team into silence as court ended for the day around 4:20pm ET.

Grant Smith Ellis

23,616 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Watching the families of the victims walk out of the courthouse made me sad. I have no doubt AJ is going to destroy their lives and the lives of others now that he’s on this case. Article linked below from before AJ joined the team. Much like Yannetti did with Karen, the previous attorney basically admits this kid did it and he was there “to seek justice, not to have his client freed from any responsibility for the crash.” I have a feeling now that AJ is involved that’s going to change.
1:20

Watching the families of the victims walk out of the courthouse made me sad. I have no doubt AJ is going to destroy their lives and the lives of others now that he’s on this case. Article linked below from before AJ joined the team. Much like Yannetti did with Karen, the previous attorney basically admits this kid did it and he was there “to seek justice, not to have his client freed from any responsibility for the crash.” I have a feeling now that AJ is involved that’s going to change.

Jamz

110,504 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

NOW: Attorney Shezza Abboushi Dallal of Mahmoud Khalil's legal team shares the details of the last few weeks of his case. "We know this is a test case for how far they will go to punish organizers."
2:39

NOW: Attorney Shezza Abboushi Dallal of Mahmoud Khalil's legal team shares the details of the last few weeks of his case. "We know this is a test case for how far they will go to punish organizers."

BreakThrough News

65,045 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

This is a prime example of how effortlessly Turtleboy lies to his audience. I ran a transcript on the video, to create captions, so if you idiots are hearing impaired, you can read along. Judge Belazos was talking about a motion to dismiss relying on prosecutorial immunity in the civil case against Attorney Cosgrove. He was predicting that the case is frivilous and DOA, and unlikely to disqualify Cosgrove from the criminal case. He was not endorsing the third motion to dismiss filed months ago by Kearney's defense, which is largely recycled from the previous two that were already denied. The little narcissist is just trying to manufacture a "win" for his wounded ego, and is counting on all of you to be so stupid that you believe him and reinforce it. Also, don't give him your hard-earned money. He has admitted all his legal fees are paid up to date and he's buying himself a house. He doesn't need your money, he's just greedy.
0:46

This is a prime example of how effortlessly Turtleboy lies to his audience. I ran a transcript on the video, to create captions, so if you idiots are hearing impaired, you can read along. Judge Belazos was talking about a motion to dismiss relying on prosecutorial immunity in the civil case against Attorney Cosgrove. He was predicting that the case is frivilous and DOA, and unlikely to disqualify Cosgrove from the criminal case. He was not endorsing the third motion to dismiss filed months ago by Kearney's defense, which is largely recycled from the previous two that were already denied. The little narcissist is just trying to manufacture a "win" for his wounded ego, and is counting on all of you to be so stupid that you believe him and reinforce it. Also, don't give him your hard-earned money. He has admitted all his legal fees are paid up to date and he's buying himself a house. He doesn't need your money, he's just greedy.

Masshole Mafia

14,280 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Wow.. how much of a blowhard is Hank Brennan? I’ll tell you. He couldn’t even be bothered to write his own narrative🤯 To actually use the Read defense team impact line of closing from trial 1 in his closing for trial 2 is a new low..🤮
0:25

Wow.. how much of a blowhard is Hank Brennan? I’ll tell you. He couldn’t even be bothered to write his own narrative🤯 To actually use the Read defense team impact line of closing from trial 1 in his closing for trial 2 is a new low..🤮

Nurse_Kim

84,674 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

‼️RESPECTFULLY DENIED: Judge Graf Just SLAYED the ENTIRE Defense Team In Tyler Robinson Case With This FiIERY Line! 🏛️🔥 Tyler Robinson’s defense team tried for the umpteenth time to shut down the cameras and keep the Charlie Kirk murder trial in the dark—but Judge Tony Graf Jr. was NOT having it. He just absolutely SLAYED the defense with a fiery ruling for transparency! 🔥 The Epic Takedown: "This court is not so cynical as to conclude that just because the parties did not present evidence of responsible journalism, none exists... It is the motives of these specific news reporters... that the court must question, not the entire universe of media outlets and social media sites!" 🗣️💥 The Judge: Basically told them to stop blaming the "entire universe" and stick to the law. The Result: The request for a blanket ban? RESPECTFULLY DENIED. 🙅‍♂️⚖️ Is Graf the GOAT for this? Or should the cameras be cut? 🎥👇 CC: Candace Owens
0:48

‼️RESPECTFULLY DENIED: Judge Graf Just SLAYED the ENTIRE Defense Team In Tyler Robinson Case With This FiIERY Line! 🏛️🔥 Tyler Robinson’s defense team tried for the umpteenth time to shut down the cameras and keep the Charlie Kirk murder trial in the dark—but Judge Tony Graf Jr. was NOT having it. He just absolutely SLAYED the defense with a fiery ruling for transparency! 🔥 The Epic Takedown: "This court is not so cynical as to conclude that just because the parties did not present evidence of responsible journalism, none exists... It is the motives of these specific news reporters... that the court must question, not the entire universe of media outlets and social media sites!" 🗣️💥 The Judge: Basically told them to stop blaming the "entire universe" and stick to the law. The Result: The request for a blanket ban? RESPECTFULLY DENIED. 🙅‍♂️⚖️ Is Graf the GOAT for this? Or should the cameras be cut? 🎥👇 CC: Candace Owens

Project Constitution

93,623 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Subramanyam: Have you ever talked about your case with the President? Adams: This case is in front of Judge Ho and out of deference to him— Subramanyam: Have you ever talked about your case with anyone in the Trump Administration? Adams: This case is in front of Judge Ho and out of deference to Judge Ho, he’s going to determine the outcome of this case.
0:59

Subramanyam: Have you ever talked about your case with the President? Adams: This case is in front of Judge Ho and out of deference to him— Subramanyam: Have you ever talked about your case with anyone in the Trump Administration? Adams: This case is in front of Judge Ho and out of deference to Judge Ho, he’s going to determine the outcome of this case.

Acyn

122,544 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

JUST IN: Here is the video of Karen Read leaving court after the first day of defense testimony in the John O'Keefe and Karen Read re-trial. Karen lost her motion for a directed verdict and Hank Brennan shined on cross. Karen won't be calling Michael Proctor, although she may not be able to get his text messages into evidence unless he takes the stand during the defense's case. Judge Cannone is expected to issue a ruling on Monday as to whether the defense must call Proctor to the stand in order to introduce his text messages. The defense wants to call Proctor's friends to get the text messages into evidence, but that ran into a hearsay objection from Hank Brennan (and an end-of-day motion hearing on that issue). The defense is unlikely, if they are forced to call Proctor in order to get the texts into evidence, to do so, as Read's lawyers would be forced to ask open-ended questions of Proctor on direct (and Hank Brennan could then ask Proctor leading questions on cross).
3:04

JUST IN: Here is the video of Karen Read leaving court after the first day of defense testimony in the John O'Keefe and Karen Read re-trial. Karen lost her motion for a directed verdict and Hank Brennan shined on cross. Karen won't be calling Michael Proctor, although she may not be able to get his text messages into evidence unless he takes the stand during the defense's case. Judge Cannone is expected to issue a ruling on Monday as to whether the defense must call Proctor to the stand in order to introduce his text messages. The defense wants to call Proctor's friends to get the text messages into evidence, but that ran into a hearsay objection from Hank Brennan (and an end-of-day motion hearing on that issue). The defense is unlikely, if they are forced to call Proctor in order to get the texts into evidence, to do so, as Read's lawyers would be forced to ask open-ended questions of Proctor on direct (and Hank Brennan could then ask Proctor leading questions on cross).

Grant Smith Ellis

14,237 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 SHOCKING UPDATE: Karmelo Anthony Refuses to Take the Stand as Defense Rests in Austin Metcalf Murder Trial The defense has officially rested its case — and Karmelo Anthony chose NOT to testify. After a schoolmate already torpedoed his “self-defense” story, Anthony stayed silent. No explanation to the jury. No facing the family of the 17-year-old he admits stabbing to death. From a Black Texan’s perspective: this case is heartbreaking on every level. Young lives lost, and now the courtroom silence speaks volumes. Closing arguments starting this morning. Justice for Austin Metcalf. What do you think this refusal signals? 👇 #KarmeloAnthony #JusticeForAustin #AustinMetcalf #TexasTrial #TrueCrime
2:24

🚨 SHOCKING UPDATE: Karmelo Anthony Refuses to Take the Stand as Defense Rests in Austin Metcalf Murder Trial The defense has officially rested its case — and Karmelo Anthony chose NOT to testify. After a schoolmate already torpedoed his “self-defense” story, Anthony stayed silent. No explanation to the jury. No facing the family of the 17-year-old he admits stabbing to death. From a Black Texan’s perspective: this case is heartbreaking on every level. Young lives lost, and now the courtroom silence speaks volumes. Closing arguments starting this morning. Justice for Austin Metcalf. What do you think this refusal signals? 👇 #KarmeloAnthony #JusticeForAustin #AustinMetcalf #TexasTrial #TrueCrime

GRANDPA’s FREE ADVICE

16,986 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen

Fulton Co. DA's office appears to have a problem in the Christopher Wolfenbarger case. Under cross-examination by the defense, the lead investigator revealed that a VHS tape and pages of his report were missing, information that the prosecution team was aware of but had not disclosed to the defense.
0:22

Fulton Co. DA's office appears to have a problem in the Christopher Wolfenbarger case. Under cross-examination by the defense, the lead investigator revealed that a VHS tape and pages of his report were missing, information that the prosecution team was aware of but had not disclosed to the defense.

Cathy Russon

59,094 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Tyler Robinson and his defense team wants death penalty off the table because of the State’s prejudicial media statements. “I think that the number one remedy in this case is to preclude the state from seeking the death penalty against Mr. Robinson,” Novack told the court. Andrea Burkhart 🐟🐟🐟🐟🏴‍☠️’s commentary after the hearing: “The judge is not going to do anything. He is absolutely not going to take the death penalty off the table like Mr. Novak has asked for.”
1:40

Tyler Robinson and his defense team wants death penalty off the table because of the State’s prejudicial media statements. “I think that the number one remedy in this case is to preclude the state from seeking the death penalty against Mr. Robinson,” Novack told the court. Andrea Burkhart 🐟🐟🐟🐟🏴‍☠️’s commentary after the hearing: “The judge is not going to do anything. He is absolutely not going to take the death penalty off the table like Mr. Novak has asked for.”

JaneDoeUKnow

81,292 Aufrufe • vor 14 Tagen

This guy is the coach of some women's team at the college level. He had a conversation with one of his female athletes about the Civil War. The lack of knowledge this woman had is so embarrassing that I cringed. She is going to eventually need a job. I weep for the future.
2:39

This guy is the coach of some women's team at the college level. He had a conversation with one of his female athletes about the Civil War. The lack of knowledge this woman had is so embarrassing that I cringed. She is going to eventually need a job. I weep for the future.

Blonde of War (JJ)

132,075 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

REASONABLE DOUBT REASON # 1: #KarenReadTrial If a medical examiner couldn’t even determine #JohnOKeefe’s death was a homicide, how can anyone on the jury? Fun Fact: Over 4 months after Karen Read was first arrested, on June 10, 2022, DA Michael Morrissey’s Office upgraded her charges from manslaughter to second degree murder despite the fact that their medical examiner couldn’t even determine if it was a homicide. At that time in June 2022, the DA’s Office said that while some of Officer O’Keefe’s injuries were apparently known, the full autopsy findings were purportedly “not complete”. Hmm… 🤔 Was it that they were “not complete”? Or was it that they were complete but didn’t fit your narrative? The DA’s Office further went on to state: "While the evidence available at this time is not inconsistent with an accidental fall, the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner has accepted the case and will determine the cause and manner of death.” Despite apparently having neither a cause nor manner of death determination, apparently someone thought it was a good idea to charge Karen Read with not only manslaughter, but also second degree murder. Antithetical to the entire purpose of an investigation, DA Michael Morrissey’s Office and its Massachusetts State Police investigators don’t follow the evidence. Instead, they desperately twist and contort to try to make the evidence fit their narrative. Is this how we get to the truth? Is this why Michael Proctor was texting Trooper David DiCicco on April 28, 2022—in the lead up to the state grand jury to try to secure an indictment on upgraded charges—about how he wasn’t following the evidence in this case, but instead was trying to pressure the medical examiner to give him the determinations he wanted? The DA’s Office itself subsequently said “the evidence available at this time is not inconsistent with an accidental fall” and didn’t have a cause or manner of death determination! 🤯 THAT’S REASONABLE DOUBT. Prosecutors have a duty to pursue justice. They have ethical obligations. Per ABA’s Standards for the Prosecution Function, Standard 3-4.6 says that: “A prosecutor should not seek an indictment unless the prosecutor reasonably believes the charges are supported by probable cause and that there will be admissible evidence sufficient to support the charges beyond reasonable doubt at trial.” This particularly applies to the Quality and Scope of Evidence Before a Grand Jury. Yet, despite having the definition of reasonable doubt, DA Michael Morrissey’s Office moved ahead with charges and upgraded charges against Karen anyway… …because, hey, according to them it could’ve been an “accidental fall”… …which would mean that Karen Read did not kill John O’Keefe, and she’s entirely innocent… …but who cares about the truth anyways? Apparently not this DA’s Office. It’s not like someone’s life isn’t hanging in the balance or anything. I guess this all explains why the Commonwealth wanted to conceal these inconvenient truths—that John’s manner of death could not be determined—evidence exculpatory to Karen Read. They sought to preclude this from the jury at trial (per their Motion In Limine to keep out John’s manner of death evidence)—because, forget about trying to get at the truth of the matter! This was never about justice. ——— VIDEO about reasonable doubt (attached) — Attorney David Howard gives one of my favorite analogy’s for reasonable doubt. Where was there not reasonable doubt in Karen Read’s case? I’m beyond eager to hear any of the jurors from her trial explain this. Anyone have any ideas? #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #KarenRead #CantonCoverup #FreeKarenRead #PoliceCorruption
0:48

REASONABLE DOUBT REASON # 1: #KarenReadTrial If a medical examiner couldn’t even determine #JohnOKeefe’s death was a homicide, how can anyone on the jury? Fun Fact: Over 4 months after Karen Read was first arrested, on June 10, 2022, DA Michael Morrissey’s Office upgraded her charges from manslaughter to second degree murder despite the fact that their medical examiner couldn’t even determine if it was a homicide. At that time in June 2022, the DA’s Office said that while some of Officer O’Keefe’s injuries were apparently known, the full autopsy findings were purportedly “not complete”. Hmm… 🤔 Was it that they were “not complete”? Or was it that they were complete but didn’t fit your narrative? The DA’s Office further went on to state: "While the evidence available at this time is not inconsistent with an accidental fall, the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner has accepted the case and will determine the cause and manner of death.” Despite apparently having neither a cause nor manner of death determination, apparently someone thought it was a good idea to charge Karen Read with not only manslaughter, but also second degree murder. Antithetical to the entire purpose of an investigation, DA Michael Morrissey’s Office and its Massachusetts State Police investigators don’t follow the evidence. Instead, they desperately twist and contort to try to make the evidence fit their narrative. Is this how we get to the truth? Is this why Michael Proctor was texting Trooper David DiCicco on April 28, 2022—in the lead up to the state grand jury to try to secure an indictment on upgraded charges—about how he wasn’t following the evidence in this case, but instead was trying to pressure the medical examiner to give him the determinations he wanted? The DA’s Office itself subsequently said “the evidence available at this time is not inconsistent with an accidental fall” and didn’t have a cause or manner of death determination! 🤯 THAT’S REASONABLE DOUBT. Prosecutors have a duty to pursue justice. They have ethical obligations. Per ABA’s Standards for the Prosecution Function, Standard 3-4.6 says that: “A prosecutor should not seek an indictment unless the prosecutor reasonably believes the charges are supported by probable cause and that there will be admissible evidence sufficient to support the charges beyond reasonable doubt at trial.” This particularly applies to the Quality and Scope of Evidence Before a Grand Jury. Yet, despite having the definition of reasonable doubt, DA Michael Morrissey’s Office moved ahead with charges and upgraded charges against Karen anyway… …because, hey, according to them it could’ve been an “accidental fall”… …which would mean that Karen Read did not kill John O’Keefe, and she’s entirely innocent… …but who cares about the truth anyways? Apparently not this DA’s Office. It’s not like someone’s life isn’t hanging in the balance or anything. I guess this all explains why the Commonwealth wanted to conceal these inconvenient truths—that John’s manner of death could not be determined—evidence exculpatory to Karen Read. They sought to preclude this from the jury at trial (per their Motion In Limine to keep out John’s manner of death evidence)—because, forget about trying to get at the truth of the matter! This was never about justice. ——— VIDEO about reasonable doubt (attached) — Attorney David Howard gives one of my favorite analogy’s for reasonable doubt. Where was there not reasonable doubt in Karen Read’s case? I’m beyond eager to hear any of the jurors from her trial explain this. Anyone have any ideas? #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #KarenRead #CantonCoverup #FreeKarenRead #PoliceCorruption

Olivia

236,339 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

JUDGE GILDEA RIPS INTO KAREN READ'S ATTORNEY The mainstream media hid this - but I won't. Here is the beginning of yesterday's hearing, where the judge admonishes Attorney Rosenberg and even threatens to cancel the hearing if he doesn't STFU. Judge rebukes him for his games in motions, serving late subpoenas, and making a conscious decision not to attend the deposition of Colin Albert.
17:36

JUDGE GILDEA RIPS INTO KAREN READ'S ATTORNEY The mainstream media hid this - but I won't. Here is the beginning of yesterday's hearing, where the judge admonishes Attorney Rosenberg and even threatens to cancel the hearing if he doesn't STFU. Judge rebukes him for his games in motions, serving late subpoenas, and making a conscious decision not to attend the deposition of Colin Albert.

Masshole Mafia

62,945 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen