正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

This past Thursday, Brian Hooker, PhD described getting the results back from his son's hair-metal test. Holding that paper from the doctor's office, and crumpling down on the bathroom floor and sobbing. Because you cannot unvaccinate your child. Once that vaccine is in, it's in. And with the vaccine...

HighWireTalk's profile picture

The HighWire

253,487 subscribers

23,152 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🚨 Dr. Brian Hooker speaks bluntly about the permanent damage of vaccination. “You cannot un-autism a kid.” “You cannot un-vaccinate your child.” “You just cannot.” “Once that vaccine is in, it’s going to do frank damage.” “And frankly, with the vaccine schedule today… no one gets a pass.” “There’s damage that is done to every single child, whether you know it, whether you recognize it or not.” The HighWire Brian Hooker, PhD
1:08

🚨 Dr. Brian Hooker speaks bluntly about the permanent damage of vaccination. “You cannot un-autism a kid.” “You cannot un-vaccinate your child.” “You just cannot.” “Once that vaccine is in, it’s going to do frank damage.” “And frankly, with the vaccine schedule today… no one gets a pass.” “There’s damage that is done to every single child, whether you know it, whether you recognize it or not.” The HighWire Brian Hooker, PhD

Children’s Health Defense

41,475 次观看 • 4 个月前

Dr. Paul Thomas: "And there's no safe vaccine on the childhood schedule, period. So at this point, I'm also an anti-vaxxer because we don't have a safe vaccine. We don't even have a single one that was properly tested for safety." "However, if you aren't comfortable with how you want your child to die I say in the book in the book Vax Facts that you are more likely to die from the vaccine than you are from the disease for which there is a vaccine, and this is true for every single vaccine on the childhood schedule. It's still a death." "It's still super rare, but you're much more likely to die from the vaccine. So which do you want? You want a greater chance of dying from the vaccine or a lesser chance of dying from the disease? Of course, from many of these diseases, the risk is zero."
0:42

Dr. Paul Thomas: "And there's no safe vaccine on the childhood schedule, period. So at this point, I'm also an anti-vaxxer because we don't have a safe vaccine. We don't even have a single one that was properly tested for safety." "However, if you aren't comfortable with how you want your child to die I say in the book in the book Vax Facts that you are more likely to die from the vaccine than you are from the disease for which there is a vaccine, and this is true for every single vaccine on the childhood schedule. It's still a death." "It's still super rare, but you're much more likely to die from the vaccine. So which do you want? You want a greater chance of dying from the vaccine or a lesser chance of dying from the disease? Of course, from many of these diseases, the risk is zero."

Camus

69,827 次观看 • 1 年前

"We don't know if [any] vaccine will cause cancer or impair your child's fertility later in life. That's every single childhood vaccine... [none of them have] been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or impairment of fertility." This clip of board-certified primary care physician Dr. Jeffrey Barke (Dr. Jeff Barke) is taken from a podcast episode of The Counter Culture Mom Show (Tina Griffin) posted to Rumble on May 12, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "My push is really to educate, to give informed consent that isn't otherwise usually given. And the FDA package insert that's required by every vaccine, by every drug, by the way, has a standardized format, and it takes a while. And it took a while for me to teach myself how to read this package insert. "But they're all standardized. So, for example, section 13.1 that every parent should be aware of for childhood vaccines says the following. And I'm literally reading from the package insert. This vaccine is Vaxelis, which is insane. It has six vaccines in one, but nonetheless, they all read the same. So 13.1 says, quote, Vaxelis has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or impairment of fertility. Translation, we don't know if this vaccine will cause cancer or impair your child's fertility later in life. That's every single childhood vaccine. "Again, I'm not telling you that you shouldn't get this product, but what I am saying is you should be aware of this. You should also be aware of what the ingredients are in the vaccine. You should be aware of what the studies are that brought the product to market. "Most people, Tina, don't realize that not a single childhood vaccine that's on the CDC schedule and approved by the FDA has ever been tested against a placebo and inert placebo in a randomized control trial. Not a single one of them. Why do you think that is? And if you're listening to this and you're like, you're crazy, that's not true. It actually is true. And the reason why that is, is the FDA has a very different level of scrutiny to bring vaccines to the market versus bringing drugs to the market. "So all these vaccines have come to the market, especially after the act that was passed in the mid-1980s that gave the manufacturers of these vaccines liability protection. So if you're injured by one of these vaccines, you have no recourse against the manufacturer. Once that liability protection was enacted, then the vaccine schedule exploded. And it makes sense. There's no downside. There's only upside down. They make a boatload of money. They have no risk, they have no liability. You can't sue the vaccine company. "And it's said for every new vaccine that's added to the CDC childhood vaccine schedule, that is a 1 billion with a B dollar annuity for that vaccine company. They don't have to advertise. CDC does it for them. They don't have any liability. So it's money in their pocket. And. And what incentive do the vaccine companies have to be extra sure that the product that they're injecting into our children is safe and effective if they have no downside liability. So again, get it or don't get it, but only after informed consent. Only after you know the details of what's in the package insert."
3:11

"We don't know if [any] vaccine will cause cancer or impair your child's fertility later in life. That's every single childhood vaccine... [none of them have] been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or impairment of fertility." This clip of board-certified primary care physician Dr. Jeffrey Barke (Dr. Jeff Barke) is taken from a podcast episode of The Counter Culture Mom Show (Tina Griffin) posted to Rumble on May 12, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "My push is really to educate, to give informed consent that isn't otherwise usually given. And the FDA package insert that's required by every vaccine, by every drug, by the way, has a standardized format, and it takes a while. And it took a while for me to teach myself how to read this package insert. "But they're all standardized. So, for example, section 13.1 that every parent should be aware of for childhood vaccines says the following. And I'm literally reading from the package insert. This vaccine is Vaxelis, which is insane. It has six vaccines in one, but nonetheless, they all read the same. So 13.1 says, quote, Vaxelis has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or impairment of fertility. Translation, we don't know if this vaccine will cause cancer or impair your child's fertility later in life. That's every single childhood vaccine. "Again, I'm not telling you that you shouldn't get this product, but what I am saying is you should be aware of this. You should also be aware of what the ingredients are in the vaccine. You should be aware of what the studies are that brought the product to market. "Most people, Tina, don't realize that not a single childhood vaccine that's on the CDC schedule and approved by the FDA has ever been tested against a placebo and inert placebo in a randomized control trial. Not a single one of them. Why do you think that is? And if you're listening to this and you're like, you're crazy, that's not true. It actually is true. And the reason why that is, is the FDA has a very different level of scrutiny to bring vaccines to the market versus bringing drugs to the market. "So all these vaccines have come to the market, especially after the act that was passed in the mid-1980s that gave the manufacturers of these vaccines liability protection. So if you're injured by one of these vaccines, you have no recourse against the manufacturer. Once that liability protection was enacted, then the vaccine schedule exploded. And it makes sense. There's no downside. There's only upside down. They make a boatload of money. They have no risk, they have no liability. You can't sue the vaccine company. "And it's said for every new vaccine that's added to the CDC childhood vaccine schedule, that is a 1 billion with a B dollar annuity for that vaccine company. They don't have to advertise. CDC does it for them. They don't have any liability. So it's money in their pocket. And. And what incentive do the vaccine companies have to be extra sure that the product that they're injecting into our children is safe and effective if they have no downside liability. So again, get it or don't get it, but only after informed consent. Only after you know the details of what's in the package insert."

Sense Receptor

19,421 次观看 • 1 年前

Dr. Brian Hooker just declared that the studies PROVE vaccines can cause neurological damage. “It's the aluminum.” “Aluminum is directly neurotoxic.” “You get it in the majority of 6 vaccines that are given from 2 months [through] 18 months of life.” “Children are exposed to it if they get the Hep B shot on the first day of life.” “We read through [studies] regarding vaccines, the vaccine schedule, and autism.” “[One] paper makes the linkages from an epidemiological perspective.” “From a biochemical… cell biology, and molecular genetics perspective.” “We actually… worked our way backward from the damage that we know occurs in the brains of children and adults with autism.” “What came out very, very conclusively was that there isn’t just one problem with vaccines, but if you were to pick one, it is so ubiquitous.” “Aluminum salt adjuvants, aluminum phosphate, aluminum sulfate, aluminum hydroxy phosphate sulfate.” Brian Hooker, PhD Robert Scott Bell #ProfoundAutism
2:37

Dr. Brian Hooker just declared that the studies PROVE vaccines can cause neurological damage. “It's the aluminum.” “Aluminum is directly neurotoxic.” “You get it in the majority of 6 vaccines that are given from 2 months [through] 18 months of life.” “Children are exposed to it if they get the Hep B shot on the first day of life.” “We read through [studies] regarding vaccines, the vaccine schedule, and autism.” “[One] paper makes the linkages from an epidemiological perspective.” “From a biochemical… cell biology, and molecular genetics perspective.” “We actually… worked our way backward from the damage that we know occurs in the brains of children and adults with autism.” “What came out very, very conclusively was that there isn’t just one problem with vaccines, but if you were to pick one, it is so ubiquitous.” “Aluminum salt adjuvants, aluminum phosphate, aluminum sulfate, aluminum hydroxy phosphate sulfate.” Brian Hooker, PhD Robert Scott Bell #ProfoundAutism

Children’s Health Defense

19,594 次观看 • 3 个月前

Steve Jobs on why "that's how we've always done it" is the most dangerous phrase in business: "In most companies if you're new and you ask why is it done this way, the answer is because that's the way we do it here or because that's the way it's always been done" "That single shift is everything in my opinion because in that shift is a tremendous optimistic point of view about the people that work in a company. It says these people are very smart, they're not pawns, they're very smart, and if given the opportunity to change and improve they will improve the processes"
1:21

Steve Jobs on why "that's how we've always done it" is the most dangerous phrase in business: "In most companies if you're new and you ask why is it done this way, the answer is because that's the way we do it here or because that's the way it's always been done" "That single shift is everything in my opinion because in that shift is a tremendous optimistic point of view about the people that work in a company. It says these people are very smart, they're not pawns, they're very smart, and if given the opportunity to change and improve they will improve the processes"

Jaynit

21,813 次观看 • 2 个月前

Dr. Brian Hooker just slammed the CDC for sitting on data exposing the truth about the autism epidemic—and doing nothing. “They do not want to implicate any vaccine or vaccine component in causing autism.” But his team has done the study. Here’s what they found: “This is a multifactorial disorder that implicates the complex sort of toxic soup that we live in today.” “What we are looking at is [vaccine components that] screw up mitochondria and then cause autism.” “One series of publications that put all of that together doesn't exist.” “They’ve had the data, they've had the information.” “What we did was we took the information that shows the pieces of the puzzle, and we link that information together.” “In addition to that, we talk about what it would take for a single publication to do that.” “So I'm really proud of this paper.” “I don't think you can conclude that it's one thing and only one thing.” “You look at what causes the oxidative stress and what causes the damage that happens in the brain there.” “It's multifactorial.” “In some instances, it's many factors that come into play together.” “In other instances, it can be overwhelmingly a single factor or just a small number of factors.” Brian Hooker, PhD Robert Scott Bell
3:04

Dr. Brian Hooker just slammed the CDC for sitting on data exposing the truth about the autism epidemic—and doing nothing. “They do not want to implicate any vaccine or vaccine component in causing autism.” But his team has done the study. Here’s what they found: “This is a multifactorial disorder that implicates the complex sort of toxic soup that we live in today.” “What we are looking at is [vaccine components that] screw up mitochondria and then cause autism.” “One series of publications that put all of that together doesn't exist.” “They’ve had the data, they've had the information.” “What we did was we took the information that shows the pieces of the puzzle, and we link that information together.” “In addition to that, we talk about what it would take for a single publication to do that.” “So I'm really proud of this paper.” “I don't think you can conclude that it's one thing and only one thing.” “You look at what causes the oxidative stress and what causes the damage that happens in the brain there.” “It's multifactorial.” “In some instances, it's many factors that come into play together.” “In other instances, it can be overwhelmingly a single factor or just a small number of factors.” Brian Hooker, PhD Robert Scott Bell

Children’s Health Defense

23,496 次观看 • 2 个月前

"The work that you put in is the win - not the win itself. You have to understand, whether or not you make it there, that's not the win. The win is did I work towards that every single day with extreme effort and enthusiasm."
0:31

"The work that you put in is the win - not the win itself. You have to understand, whether or not you make it there, that's not the win. The win is did I work towards that every single day with extreme effort and enthusiasm."

The Winning Difference

16,529 次观看 • 3 个月前

Dr. Brian Hooker just revealed why he suspects “half a million or more people” have died from Covid-19 shots. This will shock you to your core. Dan Ball: “We’re learning now that the VAERS reporting system shows at least 38,472 reported deaths connected to the Covid vax.” “9,200 of those deaths occurred either on the day of the vaccination or one to two days after.” “And now we know out of those 38,000, 10 of them were kids.” “I remember the Biden regime telling us nobody was dying, no kids ever died, you’re not gonna die from getting the shot.” “Liars!” Dr. Brian Hooker: “Absolute liars.” “And the thing about that is that the VAERS system … really only captures somewhere between 1-5% of all the vaccine injuries and vaccine deaths that are associated with the Covid shot.” “Most practitioners … will not report a vaccine adverse event.” “So I would dare say that if you look at the number of people who have died due to the Covid vaccine in the United States, it’s probably much higher.” “It’s probably more like a half a million or more people that have succumbed to death because of some … consequence that is associated directly with mRNA vaccines.” One America News Brian Hooker, PhD
2:19

Dr. Brian Hooker just revealed why he suspects “half a million or more people” have died from Covid-19 shots. This will shock you to your core. Dan Ball: “We’re learning now that the VAERS reporting system shows at least 38,472 reported deaths connected to the Covid vax.” “9,200 of those deaths occurred either on the day of the vaccination or one to two days after.” “And now we know out of those 38,000, 10 of them were kids.” “I remember the Biden regime telling us nobody was dying, no kids ever died, you’re not gonna die from getting the shot.” “Liars!” Dr. Brian Hooker: “Absolute liars.” “And the thing about that is that the VAERS system … really only captures somewhere between 1-5% of all the vaccine injuries and vaccine deaths that are associated with the Covid shot.” “Most practitioners … will not report a vaccine adverse event.” “So I would dare say that if you look at the number of people who have died due to the Covid vaccine in the United States, it’s probably much higher.” “It’s probably more like a half a million or more people that have succumbed to death because of some … consequence that is associated directly with mRNA vaccines.” One America News Brian Hooker, PhD

Children’s Health Defense

110,496 次观看 • 6 个月前

.Chamath Palihapitiya on JD Vance's speech in Europe: "That's amazing... There is not a single company that's getting started today that has a desire to locate an office directly inside of the UK or Europe. Why? Because the regulatory framework will come and go after you... It all goes back to the root cause that JD is identifying. If you can't say it, you can't fix it." FULL:
2:33

.Chamath Palihapitiya on JD Vance's speech in Europe: "That's amazing... There is not a single company that's getting started today that has a desire to locate an office directly inside of the UK or Europe. Why? Because the regulatory framework will come and go after you... It all goes back to the root cause that JD is identifying. If you can't say it, you can't fix it." FULL:

The Megyn Kelly Show

334,053 次观看 • 1 年前

“What did you think of Lando being booed at race because people and I've seen it online as well say he doesn't deserve the title because McLaren favored him over his teammate. Do you think that's total nonsense?” Jacques Villeneuve: “That's a little bit ridiculous. When there was some booing in some races, that was embarrassing. You should never boo a driver that's clean, doesn't do anything dirty, on track is respectful, and on top of it is super fast. What's wrong with people? That was embarrassing. And, had it been that Piastri was a second a lap faster than him and somehow Lando was winning because a lot of things were happening, his car breaking down every time, then you could start thinking, okay, that's really not cool. That's not fair. But that wasn't the case. And in the second half, Norris has been faster right at the beginning as well, last year as well. So there's this whole middle of the season where Piastri was driving a lot better than Norris and was getting the points. Norris had an engine blowing up, not Piastri. And so those fans, they don't look at that either. You have to look at the whole picture, at the whole season. And suddenly if your favorite is starting to go backwards, you just got to bite the bullet and accept it. Your favorite is just going backwards. That doesn't mean that the other one is treated better or the other one is undeserving just because the one you're a fan of is not winning right now. That’s really wrong. If you're a fan of the sport, then you have to be a fan of the sport and understand when your driver is maybe not cutting it at this point in time, even though he was before and he will in the future again. It's all a question of timing. But that's the price we have to pay now with social media and how big F1 has become. It's very passionate. The people are passionate and once, you know, fans come from fanatism, you stop thinking, when you get in that mindset and it happens to all of us. You want something so much that you get attached and you cannot - it's hard to start seeing reality. So you will try to mold the reality to your thought process and if your champion is not winning then it cannot be his fault. It has to be something from the outside. It has to be the team destroying his chance or not favoring and so on and so on and so on. But there's nothing concrete behind those comments. It's pure fandom and it'll always be like this. And ultimately it's not a bad thing. You know drivers at that - sportsman at that level have to grow a thick skin. If not, you don't deserve to be there. You just have to have a thick skin because they're all very happy to get the compliments. They love it when it's just positive, but it gets balanced out with negatives and you need to be able to take and accept the negatives as well. It goes both ways. You cannot have the good. You just have to be a thick skin and know that it's part and parcels of what's going on. And in one month, it will be forgotten and maybe everything will change and it be the other driver that suddenly will be criticized and so on. So, it's just that's just the way it is.”
3:10

“What did you think of Lando being booed at race because people and I've seen it online as well say he doesn't deserve the title because McLaren favored him over his teammate. Do you think that's total nonsense?” Jacques Villeneuve: “That's a little bit ridiculous. When there was some booing in some races, that was embarrassing. You should never boo a driver that's clean, doesn't do anything dirty, on track is respectful, and on top of it is super fast. What's wrong with people? That was embarrassing. And, had it been that Piastri was a second a lap faster than him and somehow Lando was winning because a lot of things were happening, his car breaking down every time, then you could start thinking, okay, that's really not cool. That's not fair. But that wasn't the case. And in the second half, Norris has been faster right at the beginning as well, last year as well. So there's this whole middle of the season where Piastri was driving a lot better than Norris and was getting the points. Norris had an engine blowing up, not Piastri. And so those fans, they don't look at that either. You have to look at the whole picture, at the whole season. And suddenly if your favorite is starting to go backwards, you just got to bite the bullet and accept it. Your favorite is just going backwards. That doesn't mean that the other one is treated better or the other one is undeserving just because the one you're a fan of is not winning right now. That’s really wrong. If you're a fan of the sport, then you have to be a fan of the sport and understand when your driver is maybe not cutting it at this point in time, even though he was before and he will in the future again. It's all a question of timing. But that's the price we have to pay now with social media and how big F1 has become. It's very passionate. The people are passionate and once, you know, fans come from fanatism, you stop thinking, when you get in that mindset and it happens to all of us. You want something so much that you get attached and you cannot - it's hard to start seeing reality. So you will try to mold the reality to your thought process and if your champion is not winning then it cannot be his fault. It has to be something from the outside. It has to be the team destroying his chance or not favoring and so on and so on and so on. But there's nothing concrete behind those comments. It's pure fandom and it'll always be like this. And ultimately it's not a bad thing. You know drivers at that - sportsman at that level have to grow a thick skin. If not, you don't deserve to be there. You just have to have a thick skin because they're all very happy to get the compliments. They love it when it's just positive, but it gets balanced out with negatives and you need to be able to take and accept the negatives as well. It goes both ways. You cannot have the good. You just have to be a thick skin and know that it's part and parcels of what's going on. And in one month, it will be forgotten and maybe everything will change and it be the other driver that suddenly will be criticized and so on. So, it's just that's just the way it is.”

naenia ¹ ⁶³

29,833 次观看 • 7 个月前

RFK Jr: "Individuals who work at NIH can collect royalties on drugs that they helped develop." "So for example, the Moderna vaccine is 50% owned by NIH, and they were promoting that vaccine. They're getting billions of dollars from that vaccine... So this distorts everything." "[NIH has] become an incubator for pharmaceutical products.... It's no longer studying why are Americans so sick. When my uncle was president, 6% of Americans had chronic disease. Today, 60% do... Why is this happening?" "NIH's job is to find that out... and it won't look for it because it knows that there is some big company that is responsible for that. It's the pharmaceutical companies. It's the food or chemical companies." "Why are we the sickest country in the world? Why has autism gone from one in 10,000 in my generation, to one in every 34 in my kids' generation? Why is one in every three kids diabetic or pre-diabetic? Why did peanut allergies suddenly appear in 1989?" "Nobody has the answers to these questions. They're easy to answer... I'm going to say to [NIH], those are the questions we're going to answer now. We're going to figure out why we're the sickest country in the world." "It's costing us $4.3 trillion a year. That's five times our military budget. And we can end it. We can end it overnight. We have to identify what's causing it." "Is it high-fructose corn syrup? Is it glyphosate from Roundup? Is it neonicotinoid pesticides? Is it the forever chemicals? It's an easy thing to identify them, and then to eliminate them." "And that's what I'm going to do."
3:19

RFK Jr: "Individuals who work at NIH can collect royalties on drugs that they helped develop." "So for example, the Moderna vaccine is 50% owned by NIH, and they were promoting that vaccine. They're getting billions of dollars from that vaccine... So this distorts everything." "[NIH has] become an incubator for pharmaceutical products.... It's no longer studying why are Americans so sick. When my uncle was president, 6% of Americans had chronic disease. Today, 60% do... Why is this happening?" "NIH's job is to find that out... and it won't look for it because it knows that there is some big company that is responsible for that. It's the pharmaceutical companies. It's the food or chemical companies." "Why are we the sickest country in the world? Why has autism gone from one in 10,000 in my generation, to one in every 34 in my kids' generation? Why is one in every three kids diabetic or pre-diabetic? Why did peanut allergies suddenly appear in 1989?" "Nobody has the answers to these questions. They're easy to answer... I'm going to say to [NIH], those are the questions we're going to answer now. We're going to figure out why we're the sickest country in the world." "It's costing us $4.3 trillion a year. That's five times our military budget. And we can end it. We can end it overnight. We have to identify what's causing it." "Is it high-fructose corn syrup? Is it glyphosate from Roundup? Is it neonicotinoid pesticides? Is it the forever chemicals? It's an easy thing to identify them, and then to eliminate them." "And that's what I'm going to do."

Wide Awake Media

327,840 次观看 • 1 年前

The latest from Marco Rubio on the negotiations: “It's the reason why we're involved in this whole Ukraine-Russia conflict. That's not our war, it's not the president's war. This war started... It never would have happened if you'd been president. But this war is going on and the president is trying to end it, not because... Listen, we got a million things to focus on in the world as a country. But he's the only leader in the world that can help end it, and that's why we're... Tha- that's why even as we speak to you now, uh, Steve Witkof is in Moscow trying to find a way to end this war to save lives of eight, nine thousand people, Mr. President, as you want to know are dying every week. More people are dying a week in that war than have died in the entirety of the US's involvement in Afghanistan or Iraq. Just think about that, how bloody and destructive it is”.
0:38

The latest from Marco Rubio on the negotiations: “It's the reason why we're involved in this whole Ukraine-Russia conflict. That's not our war, it's not the president's war. This war started... It never would have happened if you'd been president. But this war is going on and the president is trying to end it, not because... Listen, we got a million things to focus on in the world as a country. But he's the only leader in the world that can help end it, and that's why we're... Tha- that's why even as we speak to you now, uh, Steve Witkof is in Moscow trying to find a way to end this war to save lives of eight, nine thousand people, Mr. President, as you want to know are dying every week. More people are dying a week in that war than have died in the entirety of the US's involvement in Afghanistan or Iraq. Just think about that, how bloody and destructive it is”.

Kateryna Lisunova

126,074 次观看 • 7 个月前

"For every one child that is saved from death from COVID-19, there are 30 child deaths associated with the COVID-19 vaccine." Dr. Brian Hooker testifies against lack of oversight on ALL vaccines. Study Comparing Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Children (2020): • Vaccinated children were found to be at least twice as likely to be diagnosed with developmental delays, ear infections, and gastrointestinal disorders. • Vaccinated children had a 4.5 times higher likelihood of an asthma diagnosis compared to unvaccinated children. Dr. Hooker revealed that the CDC possesses a Vaccine Safety Datalink with potential for comparative studies between vaccinated and unvaccinated children but refuses to allow independent researchers access or publish results from such data. Brian Hooker, PhD has submitted over 120 FOIA requests to the CDC to access the Vaccine Safety Datalink, all of which have been refused.
10:01

"For every one child that is saved from death from COVID-19, there are 30 child deaths associated with the COVID-19 vaccine." Dr. Brian Hooker testifies against lack of oversight on ALL vaccines. Study Comparing Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Children (2020): • Vaccinated children were found to be at least twice as likely to be diagnosed with developmental delays, ear infections, and gastrointestinal disorders. • Vaccinated children had a 4.5 times higher likelihood of an asthma diagnosis compared to unvaccinated children. Dr. Hooker revealed that the CDC possesses a Vaccine Safety Datalink with potential for comparative studies between vaccinated and unvaccinated children but refuses to allow independent researchers access or publish results from such data. Brian Hooker, PhD has submitted over 120 FOIA requests to the CDC to access the Vaccine Safety Datalink, all of which have been refused.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

578,193 次观看 • 2 年前

CHD researchers just published a bombshell study exposing that infant mortality rates double after childhood vaccination. Then, it was REMOVED with no explanation. And the advisory board that removed it has ZERO safety expertise. Dr. Brian Hooker: "Retraction is a word that’s usually associated with peer-reviewed studies.” “But this was a Preprint server… a place that you can take research that is awaiting peer review [and put it] in the public domain." "Even with those parameters, Preprints and their 318 scientific advisors decided to take it down anyway." Dr. Karl Jablonowski: “We went over the withdrawal policy with a fine-tooth comb.” “They’re concerned about a court order or government agency request.” "They’re concerned about plagiarism, which couldn’t possibly be because we wrote every word ourselves." "The very last statement of the withdrawal policy is: the content poses a risk to the general public." Rick Jaffe: "Well, they got you there." "The risk to the general public is they’re gonna understand [that here] you have… a [100%] greater chance of dying.” Dr. Jablonowski: "That advisory board of over 300+ people, not a single one of them has ever published on vaccine safety." "Not a single one of them has ever published on infant mortality." "They are not qualified to peer review." "They wouldn’t be selected as peer reviewers for the paper." "It's a risk to the general public to remove this information from scientific discourse." Vaccine Safety Research Foundation richard jaffe Brian Hooker, PhD
3:27

CHD researchers just published a bombshell study exposing that infant mortality rates double after childhood vaccination. Then, it was REMOVED with no explanation. And the advisory board that removed it has ZERO safety expertise. Dr. Brian Hooker: "Retraction is a word that’s usually associated with peer-reviewed studies.” “But this was a Preprint server… a place that you can take research that is awaiting peer review [and put it] in the public domain." "Even with those parameters, Preprints and their 318 scientific advisors decided to take it down anyway." Dr. Karl Jablonowski: “We went over the withdrawal policy with a fine-tooth comb.” “They’re concerned about a court order or government agency request.” "They’re concerned about plagiarism, which couldn’t possibly be because we wrote every word ourselves." "The very last statement of the withdrawal policy is: the content poses a risk to the general public." Rick Jaffe: "Well, they got you there." "The risk to the general public is they’re gonna understand [that here] you have… a [100%] greater chance of dying.” Dr. Jablonowski: "That advisory board of over 300+ people, not a single one of them has ever published on vaccine safety." "Not a single one of them has ever published on infant mortality." "They are not qualified to peer review." "They wouldn’t be selected as peer reviewers for the paper." "It's a risk to the general public to remove this information from scientific discourse." Vaccine Safety Research Foundation richard jaffe Brian Hooker, PhD

Children’s Health Defense

24,374 次观看 • 5 个月前

Blanche: There were a number of photographs that were pulled down after being released on Friday. That's because a judge in New York has ordered us to listen to any victim or victim rights group if they have any concerns about the material that we're putting up. Welker: 15 files disappeared from the DOJ’s website yesterday, including this photo of what looks like a desk with a drawer open containing photos of Donald Trump. Blanche: Well, you can see in that photo there are photographs of women. And we learned after releasing that photograph that there were concerns about those women and the fact that we had put that photo up. So we pulled that photo down. It has nothing to do with President Trump. Welker: Are you saying that one or more of the women in one of the photos or or several of the photos is a victim or a survivor of Jeffrey Epstein and that's why you took the those files down? Blanche: No, that's not that's not what I'm saying.
3:48

Blanche: There were a number of photographs that were pulled down after being released on Friday. That's because a judge in New York has ordered us to listen to any victim or victim rights group if they have any concerns about the material that we're putting up. Welker: 15 files disappeared from the DOJ’s website yesterday, including this photo of what looks like a desk with a drawer open containing photos of Donald Trump. Blanche: Well, you can see in that photo there are photographs of women. And we learned after releasing that photograph that there were concerns about those women and the fact that we had put that photo up. So we pulled that photo down. It has nothing to do with President Trump. Welker: Are you saying that one or more of the women in one of the photos or or several of the photos is a victim or a survivor of Jeffrey Epstein and that's why you took the those files down? Blanche: No, that's not that's not what I'm saying.

Acyn

82,796 次观看 • 6 个月前

Philadelphia Officer Says The City Is No Longer Putting Up With The Crime Wave “The mayor, the commissioner and the governor said we gonna do something about the theft. They passed new legislation that they're going after people” “That's not gonna happen anymore. Not the city of Philadelphia. You're gonna get prosecuted, and it's gonna be a felony. It ain't gonna be on misdemeanor.” Interviewer “Can you say something to the youth, please, about all this morning?” Officer “Well, all I have to say to the youth is put down the gun because if you come here with a gun, the chances are you're not gonna make it home. I hate to say it like that, but we have to keep it real. This is killing us. I've never seen it like this before where young people shoot up a bus depot station, 40 rounds, and shoot innocent people. Something must be done. I say this to the parents. Go in your children's room, tear it apart and find that gun. Because when they kill somebody, that's on you. You can't say, well, my child ain't you know what your children are doing. It is your job. That's your house. You own it. You are the commander in that chief in that house. Go to your children's house your room and look for these weapons. Stop it before it's too late. Either you're burying your child or you're going up to prison every month, visiting your child. It takes a community to stop this. It's not just on the police department. That's why we are out there. But it's not all about locking people up. You have to educate these people. You have to educate these young people. Guns is not the way. But there's a group of them that believe in robbing and stealing and killing. And those are the ones we have to capture and put away.“
1:51

Philadelphia Officer Says The City Is No Longer Putting Up With The Crime Wave “The mayor, the commissioner and the governor said we gonna do something about the theft. They passed new legislation that they're going after people” “That's not gonna happen anymore. Not the city of Philadelphia. You're gonna get prosecuted, and it's gonna be a felony. It ain't gonna be on misdemeanor.” Interviewer “Can you say something to the youth, please, about all this morning?” Officer “Well, all I have to say to the youth is put down the gun because if you come here with a gun, the chances are you're not gonna make it home. I hate to say it like that, but we have to keep it real. This is killing us. I've never seen it like this before where young people shoot up a bus depot station, 40 rounds, and shoot innocent people. Something must be done. I say this to the parents. Go in your children's room, tear it apart and find that gun. Because when they kill somebody, that's on you. You can't say, well, my child ain't you know what your children are doing. It is your job. That's your house. You own it. You are the commander in that chief in that house. Go to your children's house your room and look for these weapons. Stop it before it's too late. Either you're burying your child or you're going up to prison every month, visiting your child. It takes a community to stop this. It's not just on the police department. That's why we are out there. But it's not all about locking people up. You have to educate these people. You have to educate these young people. Guns is not the way. But there's a group of them that believe in robbing and stealing and killing. And those are the ones we have to capture and put away.“

Wall Street Apes

4,036,681 次观看 • 2 年前