Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

THIS PATTERN HAS NEVER FAILED IN 100 YEARS!! The most overvalued market in a century. But retail is still buying every dip like nothing is wrong. This pattern has never failed once across a hundred years of market history: Dot-com - Bubble crashed Housing bubble - Bubble crashed AI...

107,778 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

32 Comments

Tamas Csapo's profile picture
Tamas Csapo1 month ago

what do you mean “never failed in 100 years”, it literally failed in your video, you just elegantly skipped 2016.

PattyIce's profile picture
PattyIce1 month ago

Everything you post is just click bait slop

Yusen Lin's profile picture
Yusen Lin1 month ago

Three examples across a hundred years isn't a pattern, it's three examples. And you only counted the ones that crashed.

Satoshi Panda's profile picture
Satoshi Panda1 month ago

People have been saying this since the S&P was sub 6,000

Odin’s Ledger's profile picture
Odin’s Ledger1 month ago

Dot-com had massive speculation without comparable cash flows; 2008 was a debt and credit-system collapse. AI is being built on real demand, real computing infrastructure, real customers, and rapidly growing revenue. Valuations can absolutely get excessive but that doesn’t mean the underlying technology is a house of cards.

JK's profile picture
JK1 month ago

Probably should delete the last candle and probably chop the 2nd to the last candle in about half. It's impossible for the final crash price can't be lower than the price of 1920's to the 2000's just from inflation alone. The dollar today isn't the same as dollar from back then.

Johnny Cassidy's profile picture
Johnny Cassidy1 month ago

S&P 500 still has 1,000 more points in the tank. Market won’t crash unless Democrats take both branches in 2028 and tax then hell out of the top 20%. Then, there will be market crash or a market crash and civil war simultaneously.

Cryptocrat's profile picture
Cryptocrat1 month ago

Even if AI is a bubble, there is no way to know when it will burst. We cannot build an investment strategy around trying to predict exact market tops and bottoms. Even genuine bubbles can continue expanding for years before eventually correcting.

CRYPTO DOOTS's profile picture
CRYPTO DOOTS1 month ago

been saying this as well. we're seeing way too many parallels to 1999. Literally any company getting into AI is seeing their stock surge like crazy. It's not sustainable. $SNDK has to be the canary in the coal mine. It was like $40 a year ago. It's trading like a memecoin...

Doug's profile picture
Doug1 month ago

The more they print the higher we go. Hard to fight it. Maybe one day the bond market will wake up to the fact that the BLS and FED understate Actual inflation!

paine🏔️'s profile picture
paine🏔️1 month ago

@grok how do i delete someone else’s account?

Pepesso's profile picture
Pepesso1 month ago

watching very closely

Matthews Hairline's profile picture
Matthews Hairline1 month ago

Have you been on the sidelines since 2001? I feel sorry for you.

Nnoreo's profile picture
Nnoreo1 month ago

No Y-axis tells you this is bait + that dumb chart at the bottom has failed to hold true numerous times.

James's profile picture
James1 month ago

If you’re not showing your short position then this is nothing more than 💩

Repository's profile picture
Repository1 month ago

It did not work in 2019/20.

Oldman Ballsacks's profile picture
Oldman Ballsacks1 month ago

Retail is retarded.

Anonymous's profile picture
Anonymous1 month ago

There’s a reason u eat hot pockets for dinner every night

Magik Insight's profile picture
Magik Insight1 month ago

Theory is that AI traders always buy. They don't care about fundamentals. They only purchase stocks and go for the short term increase. Eventually they run out of money and feed off the system creating hyper inflation.

Bmada001's profile picture
Bmada0011 month ago

Wrong and stupid: A (panic) years missed: 1911, 1965 (no panic); 1945 mild; 1927 near 1929; 2019 early for 2020. B (peak) years: 2007 matched GFC top, 1999 near Dot-com, but 2016 no major top as market rose strongly after. Others approximate.

Urmom on PulseChain's profile picture
Urmom on PulseChain1 month ago

100 year pattern zero failures and the AI bubble printing the same setup as dot-com and housing 📊 SpaceX as the final liquidity event before the break is the most specific top signal in recent memory. The pattern doesn't care about narratives #DTGC

giles's profile picture
giles1 month ago

Trouble is your thesis isn't right the dotcom bubble happened due to due companies jumping in on the hype and kost of them where not even profitable and had massive negative cash flow. The housing bubble wasn't really a bubble it was to do with the bamks and lending.

Leviathan's profile picture
Leviathan1 month ago

👀

Alexander Voss's profile picture
Alexander Voss1 month ago

Really like your perspective on this. You bring a lot of clarity to the conversation and make people think deeper. I’ve also been checking out @nickdannunzio.

Peter Wedemeier's profile picture
Peter Wedemeier1 month ago

AI Bubble will crash!

Walter's profile picture
Walter1 month ago

Except AI is not even a tenth of a bubble dot com was, we are seeing actualy revenue being generated

WalletX.gg - Profitable Wallets Scraper's profile picture
WalletX.gg - Profitable Wallets Scraper1 month ago

dot-com: bubble housing: bubble your bags: generational wealth, obviously

m_23nyc's profile picture
m_23nyc1 month ago

nah can't compare this market to those. Will we get a pullback/correction in the next 2 months? Absolutely. But you buy that dip for a year end run into 2027 bc earnings continue to be massive

Березюк А's profile picture
Березюк А1 month ago

2019?

Keep to yourself's profile picture
Keep to yourself1 month ago

In the AI bubble debate, fundamentals matter more than patterns. Comparing today’s AI cycle directly with the dot-com or housing bubbles is too simplistic. Unlike purely speculative narratives, AI investment is already translating into real demand for data centers, semiconductors, cloud services, software, and productivity gains. Valuations are certainly elevated and corrections are always possible, but a correction does not automatically mean the AI growth story is over. In fact, market volatility can accelerate the shift of capital toward companies with stronger earnings, cash flow, and real AI-driven demand.

Carlee Padron's profile picture
Carlee Padron1 month ago

Solid insight here. I like comparing how different investors think about the same opportunity. Also following @thectspot.

Лука's profile picture
Лука1 month ago

А как же 2016?

Related Videos