Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

THIS PATTERN HAS NEVER FAILED IN 100 YEARS!! The most overvalued market in a century. But retail is still buying every dip like nothing is wrong. This pattern has never failed once across a hundred years of market history: Dot-com - Bubble crashed Housing bubble - Bubble crashed AI...

107,778 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

32 Yorum

Tamas Csapo profil fotoğrafı
Tamas Csapo1 ay önce

what do you mean “never failed in 100 years”, it literally failed in your video, you just elegantly skipped 2016.

PattyIce profil fotoğrafı
PattyIce1 ay önce

Everything you post is just click bait slop

Yusen Lin profil fotoğrafı
Yusen Lin1 ay önce

Three examples across a hundred years isn't a pattern, it's three examples. And you only counted the ones that crashed.

Satoshi Panda profil fotoğrafı
Satoshi Panda1 ay önce

People have been saying this since the S&P was sub 6,000

Odin’s Ledger profil fotoğrafı
Odin’s Ledger1 ay önce

Dot-com had massive speculation without comparable cash flows; 2008 was a debt and credit-system collapse. AI is being built on real demand, real computing infrastructure, real customers, and rapidly growing revenue. Valuations can absolutely get excessive but that doesn’t mean the underlying technology is a house of cards.

JK profil fotoğrafı
JK1 ay önce

Probably should delete the last candle and probably chop the 2nd to the last candle in about half. It's impossible for the final crash price can't be lower than the price of 1920's to the 2000's just from inflation alone. The dollar today isn't the same as dollar from back then.

Johnny Cassidy profil fotoğrafı
Johnny Cassidy1 ay önce

S&P 500 still has 1,000 more points in the tank. Market won’t crash unless Democrats take both branches in 2028 and tax then hell out of the top 20%. Then, there will be market crash or a market crash and civil war simultaneously.

Cryptocrat profil fotoğrafı
Cryptocrat1 ay önce

Even if AI is a bubble, there is no way to know when it will burst. We cannot build an investment strategy around trying to predict exact market tops and bottoms. Even genuine bubbles can continue expanding for years before eventually correcting.

CRYPTO DOOTS profil fotoğrafı
CRYPTO DOOTS1 ay önce

been saying this as well. we're seeing way too many parallels to 1999. Literally any company getting into AI is seeing their stock surge like crazy. It's not sustainable. $SNDK has to be the canary in the coal mine. It was like $40 a year ago. It's trading like a memecoin...

Doug profil fotoğrafı
Doug1 ay önce

The more they print the higher we go. Hard to fight it. Maybe one day the bond market will wake up to the fact that the BLS and FED understate Actual inflation!

paine🏔️ profil fotoğrafı
paine🏔️1 ay önce

@grok how do i delete someone else’s account?

Pepesso profil fotoğrafı
Pepesso1 ay önce

watching very closely

Matthews Hairline profil fotoğrafı
Matthews Hairline1 ay önce

Have you been on the sidelines since 2001? I feel sorry for you.

Nnoreo profil fotoğrafı
Nnoreo1 ay önce

No Y-axis tells you this is bait + that dumb chart at the bottom has failed to hold true numerous times.

James profil fotoğrafı
James1 ay önce

If you’re not showing your short position then this is nothing more than 💩

Repository profil fotoğrafı
Repository1 ay önce

It did not work in 2019/20.

Oldman Ballsacks profil fotoğrafı
Oldman Ballsacks1 ay önce

Retail is retarded.

Anonymous profil fotoğrafı
Anonymous1 ay önce

There’s a reason u eat hot pockets for dinner every night

Magik Insight profil fotoğrafı
Magik Insight1 ay önce

Theory is that AI traders always buy. They don't care about fundamentals. They only purchase stocks and go for the short term increase. Eventually they run out of money and feed off the system creating hyper inflation.

Bmada001 profil fotoğrafı
Bmada0011 ay önce

Wrong and stupid: A (panic) years missed: 1911, 1965 (no panic); 1945 mild; 1927 near 1929; 2019 early for 2020. B (peak) years: 2007 matched GFC top, 1999 near Dot-com, but 2016 no major top as market rose strongly after. Others approximate.

Urmom on PulseChain profil fotoğrafı
Urmom on PulseChain1 ay önce

100 year pattern zero failures and the AI bubble printing the same setup as dot-com and housing 📊 SpaceX as the final liquidity event before the break is the most specific top signal in recent memory. The pattern doesn't care about narratives #DTGC

giles profil fotoğrafı
giles1 ay önce

Trouble is your thesis isn't right the dotcom bubble happened due to due companies jumping in on the hype and kost of them where not even profitable and had massive negative cash flow. The housing bubble wasn't really a bubble it was to do with the bamks and lending.

Leviathan profil fotoğrafı
Leviathan1 ay önce

👀

Alexander Voss profil fotoğrafı
Alexander Voss1 ay önce

Really like your perspective on this. You bring a lot of clarity to the conversation and make people think deeper. I’ve also been checking out @nickdannunzio.

Peter Wedemeier profil fotoğrafı
Peter Wedemeier1 ay önce

AI Bubble will crash!

Walter profil fotoğrafı
Walter1 ay önce

Except AI is not even a tenth of a bubble dot com was, we are seeing actualy revenue being generated

WalletX.gg - Profitable Wallets Scraper profil fotoğrafı
WalletX.gg - Profitable Wallets Scraper1 ay önce

dot-com: bubble housing: bubble your bags: generational wealth, obviously

m_23nyc profil fotoğrafı
m_23nyc1 ay önce

nah can't compare this market to those. Will we get a pullback/correction in the next 2 months? Absolutely. But you buy that dip for a year end run into 2027 bc earnings continue to be massive

Березюк А profil fotoğrafı
Березюк А1 ay önce

2019?

Keep to yourself profil fotoğrafı
Keep to yourself1 ay önce

In the AI bubble debate, fundamentals matter more than patterns. Comparing today’s AI cycle directly with the dot-com or housing bubbles is too simplistic. Unlike purely speculative narratives, AI investment is already translating into real demand for data centers, semiconductors, cloud services, software, and productivity gains. Valuations are certainly elevated and corrections are always possible, but a correction does not automatically mean the AI growth story is over. In fact, market volatility can accelerate the shift of capital toward companies with stronger earnings, cash flow, and real AI-driven demand.

Carlee Padron profil fotoğrafı
Carlee Padron1 ay önce

Solid insight here. I like comparing how different investors think about the same opportunity. Also following @thectspot.

Лука profil fotoğrafı
Лука1 ay önce

А как же 2016?

Benzer Videolar