Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

This peptide stack literally revived my 14-year-old dog: BPC-157 + TB-500 We gave him 1-2 mg a day, 5 days on, 2 days off, injecting him basically the same way you'd inject a human. Later, we added TRT. 6 months ago, he was limping, achy, getting up slowly, and...

77,818 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

I revived my 14-year-old dog with peptides. 6 months ago, he was slowing down fast. He was limping, achy, getting up slowly, and couldn't jump on the couch. We honestly didn't know if we had 6 months left with him. Today, our boy is running, jumping on the patio, going on long walks again, and even his hearing is back. I approached his protocol the same way I'd approach mine. - We started with BPC-157 and TB-500. 1-2 mg a day, 5 days on, 2 days off, injected basically the same way you'd inject a human. Within a couple of weeks, we saw less limping, less stiffness, he was moving better, etc. - Then we ran his labs the same way I run mine. Everything looked good except some minor kidney markets, and at his age kidney issues can spiral into problems dogs don't come back from. We addressed this with a bioregulator stack, again the same ones I use. - Then we put him on TRT. We're all aware of what happens to men when testosterone tanks with age. Now consider that we neuter our dogs, cut off their testosterone production entirely, and never think about it again. We put our boy on testosterone and the change was immediate. Within days of the first shot he became a different dog. We started with one shot a week, but just like in humans, by day 5 or 6 the levels drop and you get peaks and troughs. So we split it into two shots a week: Tuesday and Friday. We started conservatively, around 20mg per shot, and titrated up from there based on how he responded and how his labs looked. We landed at about 60mg total per week for a 70 pound dog, keeping a close eye on labs the whole way. That made a huge difference. Shot day is like a revival for him. ... And it's not just us, in fact other families are running the same protocol and seeing similar results. 6 months ago we were counting the time we had left with him. My kids were horrified by the thought that he would no longer be there as they grew up with him as their full-time guardian. Now I genuinely believe we have another 3 years. If you have a dog, understand that he's aging the same way you are. He needs help, but he can't do the research... you can! And after seeing what this protocol did for him, I knew other dog owners deserved access to it too, so check the tweet below.

Michael Morelli

822,304 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

BPC-157 causing cancer? FDA shutting down peptide trials? “No human RCTs have ever been done on peptides?” In this video, Dr. Alex Tatem — board-certified urologist and fellowship-trained men’s health specialist — reacts to viral claims made on Shawn Ryan Show about BPC-157, TB-500, peptides, angiogenesis, cancer risk, and peptide safety. We break down: • Whether BPC-157 actually causes cancer • The truth about angiogenesis and tumor growth • FDA regulation of peptides and compounding • Why the “no randomized controlled trials” claim is completely false • Human clinical trial data on peptides • The real history of BPC-157 clinical studies • Huberman’s correction of viral peptide misinformation • Why peptide fearmongering could push patients toward unsafe gray-market sourcing This is not bro-science or influencer hype. This is a deep dive into the actual published literature, peptide pharmacology, FDA policy, and performance medicine. Topics covered include: BPC-157, TB-500, peptides, angiogenesis, cancer biology, GLP-1 drugs, Ozempic, tirzepatide, semaglutide, TRT, peptide therapy, biohacking, longevity, anti-aging medicine, compounding pharmacies, peptide legality, Andrew D. Huberman, Ph.D. , Shawn Ryan Show, FDA peptide regulation, growth hormone history, and performance medicine. If you’ve ever wondered whether BPC-157 is dangerous, whether peptides are legal, or whether the internet is fearmongering about peptide therapy — this video is for you.

Dr. Alex Tatem

77,332 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

BPC-157 and TB-500 are two of the most talked-about peptides in fitness, bodybuilding, and biohacking. Together they’re often called the “Wolverine Stack” — a peptide combination rumored to dramatically accelerate healing of tendons, ligaments, muscles, and injuries. But do BPC-157 and TB-500 actually work in humans, or is the Wolverine Stack just another example of internet bro-science? In this evidence-based deep dive, Dr. Alex Tatem (board-certified urologist and men’s health specialist) breaks down the real science behind BPC-157 and TB-500 — including their biochemical mechanisms, animal research, potential healing effects, safety concerns, and why pharmaceutical companies have never brought these peptides through full FDA clinical trials. We explore the nitric oxide signaling, angiogenesis, VEGF pathways, actin regulation, and tissue repair biology behind these compounds and explain why rodent studies look promising — but why human clinical evidence is still extremely limited. You’ll also learn about: • What BPC-157 (Body Protection Compound-157) actually is • TB-500 vs Thymosin Beta-4 explained • The origin of the Wolverine Stack peptide protocol • Peptides for tendon healing and ligament injuries • BPC-157 for gut healing and musculoskeletal repair • TB-500 and actin-mediated tissue regeneration • Why most peptide research comes from one Croatian research group • The patent law problem preventing pharmaceutical development • Real risks of grey-market peptide contamination • Why WADA bans BPC-157 and TB-500 in competitive athletes • Theoretical cancer risks related to angiogenesis • What the current scientific literature actually shows If you've ever searched: “Does BPC-157 work?” “What is TB-500?” “Peptides for healing injuries” “BPC-157 tendon repair” “Wolverine Stack peptides explained” — this video breaks down the science. The peptides may be promising. But promise and proof are not the same thing. Drop a comment below: Have you ever used BPC-157, TB-500, or other peptides? What was your experience? 👍 Like the video if you want more evidence-based breakdowns of supplements, PEDs, and peptides. Subscribe for deep dives on testosterone, steroids, peptides, supplements, and men’s health science.

Dr. Alex Tatem

22,510 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

ANNOUNCEMENT: A few days ago, my account was hacked. The hacker deleted my original $CHOO post, but now, we're back. They couldn't delete the mission. The community built $CHOO around ChooChoo’s story. 50% of the supply was sent to my public wallet so we could help 1 million dogs. The reason this project exists is because my 14-year-old dog ChooChoo went from almost dying to getting his life back. Nobody wanted this dog. 5 years ago, we adopted ChooChoo from a no-kill shelter in Phoenix. He was 9 years old, morbidly obese, with hypothyroidism, a heart murmur, and a long list of problems. Over the next few years, we treated his health as if I'd treat mine. A lot of the problems that were supposed to be a life sentence turned out to be manageable or reversible. But six months ago, he started limping and couldn't walk or jump. We were preparing to say goodbye. But I wasn't ready to give up, so I put him on peptides: BPC-157 plus TB-500. After about 6 weeks, we started to notice big improvements. Peptides were the gateway. Then, after the 2 month mark, we started giving him TRT. And we revived him completely. Today at 14, he is running and jumping again. And somewhere in all of that, someone created another coin using ChooChoo's name. I didn't make that one either. I loved the community that formed around ChooChoo, and I wanted to support it. But I couldn't fully get behind the old coin for a few simple reasons: 1) I had 0% supply on the last one, meaning I could have woken up one day to a random -90% candle on ChooChoo. 2) I plan to make this coin the heartbeat of Utilizing a PumpFun coin would have genuinely made that extremely difficult and I had no available supply to get in integrated. 3) Having a baked-in 1% tax will make a much bigger difference in genuinely going to help dogs that need it worldwide. With $CHOO every transaction sends 1% to the ChooChoo Fund to help dogs in need. 4) EVM seems like a much more stable ecosystem for real product integrations. This was impossible to do with a token I had no involvement in. With this one, it's possible and I'm comfortable letting my close friends and family support this project. 50% of the supply was sent to my public wallet here: 0x7C145F8B096FC7c064cA6E562d9632C16A6fA8FC I will never sell it for my personal gain. This coin exists to help grow the ChooChoo community through integrations, supporters, and bootstrapping what we wanna build over the long-term. And the long-term goal is way bigger than this coin. We are going to build Choo The Rescue. It will be a shelter for dogs like ChooChoo, who have been written off. The goal is also for $CHOO to have real utility across products, testing, therapies, and broader ChooChoo ecosystem. We'll give them another chance, the same chance ChooChoo got. Everything we're building starts here: Welcome to $CHOO.

Michael Morelli

18,867 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

This man has his American Bully dog at a park. The dog was sitting in a sit/stay training excercise. He’s had extensive training. He did have a leash on but his owner obviously didn’t have the leash in his hand, part of his continued training. As the owner walks back to him, a gentleman comes up and asks him to please put him on a leash and to hold the leash because there is a lot of distractions at the park. The owner replies “that is part of training.” The owner said “If I thought there was even a small chance he would harm a kid or react the wrong way, I wouldn't put him in that position. This isn't luck. This is hours and hours of real world training, consistency, and building him up around distractions the right way….. Breeds like American Bullies and similar dogs get judged before people even see them work, but this is what they're really about with the right leadership. Loyal, stable, and solid companions.” Some people said the gentleman who approached the owner was putting his own insecurities on a very well mannered dog. He had instant judgement. Others at the park complimented the owner on how well behaved his dog was. What a good boy that dog was. ❤️ Would you be upset if you were at the park with your child and saw this dog sitting there with his owner about 50 yards away? Do you think the owner was irresponsible? Do you think the gentleman had a right to be concerned and a right to remind the owner that there was a lot going on?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

488,786 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten