正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

🚨 This PHYSICIAN & Sr Advisor for REPRODUCTIVE Health Policy cannot answer Sen. Hawleys simple question: Hawley: "You just said...science & evidence should control, not politics. Let's test that proposition. Can MEN get pregnant?" Dr. Verma: "Uh Uh" blubbers nonsensically 🤡

Townhall.com

473,819 subscribers

29,923 次观看 • 6 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🚨 HOLY CRAP. This actually just happened on Capitol Hill. SEN. JOSH HAWLEY: "Can men get pregnant?" LIBERAL DR. VERMA: "I'm not sure what the goal of the question is." HAWLEY: "The goal is to establish a biological reality. Can men get pregnant?" VERMA: "I take care of people with many identities." HAWLEY: "Can men get pregnant?" VERMA: "Again, as I'm saying-" HAWLEY: "You said science and evidence should control. Can men get pregnant? You're a doctor, I think." VERMA: "Science and evidence should guide medicine." HAWLEY: "Do science and evidence tell us that men can get pregnant?" VERMA: "I think yes-no questions like this are a political tool." WOW. 🤯🤯🤯 Josh Hawley

🚨 HOLY CRAP. This actually just happened on Capitol Hill. SEN. JOSH HAWLEY: "Can men get pregnant?" LIBERAL DR. VERMA: "I'm not sure what the goal of the question is." HAWLEY: "The goal is to establish a biological reality. Can men get pregnant?" VERMA: "I take care of people with many identities." HAWLEY: "Can men get pregnant?" VERMA: "Again, as I'm saying-" HAWLEY: "You said science and evidence should control. Can men get pregnant? You're a doctor, I think." VERMA: "Science and evidence should guide medicine." HAWLEY: "Do science and evidence tell us that men can get pregnant?" VERMA: "I think yes-no questions like this are a political tool." WOW. 🤯🤯🤯 Josh Hawley

Eric Daugherty

9,228,475 次观看 • 6 个月前

🚨WATCH: Doctor UNABLE to answer if men can get pregnant. Josh Hawley: Do you think that man can get pregnant?" Dr. Nisha Verma: "I'm not really sure what the goal of the question is..."

🚨WATCH: Doctor UNABLE to answer if men can get pregnant. Josh Hawley: Do you think that man can get pregnant?" Dr. Nisha Verma: "I'm not really sure what the goal of the question is..."

Daily Caller

40,674 次观看 • 6 个月前

HOLY SH*T 🚨 In case you missed it. Josh Hawley asked this WOKE Doctor if men can get pregnant HAWLEY: "Do science and evidence tell us that men can get pregnant” “DR” VERMA: "I think yes/no questions like this are a political tool” Stay far away from this so called “Doctor”

HOLY SH*T 🚨 In case you missed it. Josh Hawley asked this WOKE Doctor if men can get pregnant HAWLEY: "Do science and evidence tell us that men can get pregnant” “DR” VERMA: "I think yes/no questions like this are a political tool” Stay far away from this so called “Doctor”

MAGA Voice

40,936 次观看 • 6 个月前

Sen. Josh Josh Hawley can't get this woke doctor to answer the question: "Can men get pregnant?" Dr.: "I don't think polarized language or questions–" Hawley: "It is not polarizing to say that women are a biological reality and should be treated and protected as such."

Sen. Josh Josh Hawley can't get this woke doctor to answer the question: "Can men get pregnant?" Dr.: "I don't think polarized language or questions–" Hawley: "It is not polarizing to say that women are a biological reality and should be treated and protected as such."

YAF

16,937 次观看 • 6 个月前

HAWLEY: "Do you think that men can get pregnant?" DR. VERMA: "I hesitated there because I wasn't sure where the conversation was going or what the goal was..." HAWLEY: "Well the goal is the truth, so can men get pregnant?" DR VERMA: "Again, the reason I paused there is I'm not really sure what the goal of the question..." ... HAWLEY: "This isn't hard doctor, can men get pregnant, yes or no?" DR. VERMA: "I would be more than happy to have a conversation with you that is not coming from a place of trying to be polarized..."

HAWLEY: "Do you think that men can get pregnant?" DR. VERMA: "I hesitated there because I wasn't sure where the conversation was going or what the goal was..." HAWLEY: "Well the goal is the truth, so can men get pregnant?" DR VERMA: "Again, the reason I paused there is I'm not really sure what the goal of the question..." ... HAWLEY: "This isn't hard doctor, can men get pregnant, yes or no?" DR. VERMA: "I would be more than happy to have a conversation with you that is not coming from a place of trying to be polarized..."

Fox News

269,739 次观看 • 6 个月前

Smith: So do you believe, as you've said, that antidepressants cause school shootings? This is a should be a simple question. RFK JR: I don't think anybody can answer that question… there's no science on that. Smith: The science shows that there is no link between school shootings and antidepressants. And in fact, most school shooters were not even treated with antidepressants. And of those that were, there was no evidence of association RFK JR: I don’t think you can say that because of HIPAA rules, nobody knows

Smith: So do you believe, as you've said, that antidepressants cause school shootings? This is a should be a simple question. RFK JR: I don't think anybody can answer that question… there's no science on that. Smith: The science shows that there is no link between school shootings and antidepressants. And in fact, most school shooters were not even treated with antidepressants. And of those that were, there was no evidence of association RFK JR: I don’t think you can say that because of HIPAA rules, nobody knows

Acyn

901,408 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 “CAN MEN GET PREGNANT?” — MEDICAL SCHOOL LEADERS CAN’T ANSWER BASIC BIOLOGY UNDER OATH Republican lawmakers grilled top med school officials on whether a non-biological woman (transgender man) can have a baby. The squirming and non-answers were peak absurdity. Dr. Marc Siegel: “No. Absolutely not. There has never been a single case.” He slammed the ideology: Med schools should teach real biology, hormones, anatomy, and pregnancy science — not pronouns. Congresswoman: “It shouldn’t take a medical degree to answer a basic biology question.” This exposes how woke gender ideology has infected elite medical education, wasting time on nonsense instead of excellence in actual medicine. Truth over ideology. Men can’t get pregnant. Period. Biological reality matters for patient care.

🚨 “CAN MEN GET PREGNANT?” — MEDICAL SCHOOL LEADERS CAN’T ANSWER BASIC BIOLOGY UNDER OATH Republican lawmakers grilled top med school officials on whether a non-biological woman (transgender man) can have a baby. The squirming and non-answers were peak absurdity. Dr. Marc Siegel: “No. Absolutely not. There has never been a single case.” He slammed the ideology: Med schools should teach real biology, hormones, anatomy, and pregnancy science — not pronouns. Congresswoman: “It shouldn’t take a medical degree to answer a basic biology question.” This exposes how woke gender ideology has infected elite medical education, wasting time on nonsense instead of excellence in actual medicine. Truth over ideology. Men can’t get pregnant. Period. Biological reality matters for patient care.

Gunther Eagleman™

39,102 次观看 • 1 天前

Reminder That Absolutely Nothing Has Come From The FBI Admitting On The Record A Document Exists Showing Joe Biden Took A $5 Million Dollar Bribe But They Can’t Release The Information Because The Whistleblower Would Be Killed Josh Hawley: You just started to answer Senator Blackburn's question that not releasing the 1023 are talking about as a matter of life and death question of life and death you said. Explain. FBI: It is potentially a question of life or death for whom regard to the source of the information Josh Hawley: So okay. So now we've confirmed that the document exists. That's progress because the FBI director initially denied that it exists. Why did he do that? FBI: We have already and previously acknowledged the existence of the documents. Josh Hawley: Yeah. After you first denied it. Now when a member of this committee read it Right. The FBI let's just get the record straight. The FBI director initially said it doesn't exist. Josh Hawley: —Why don't you just release it? Is it classified? FBI: The document is not classified. Josh Hawley: K. Will you commit to releasing it? FBI: Senator, we'll take that back, and we will work with you and this committee. Josh Hawley: How about just a yes or no? Will you commit to releasing this unclassified document that alleges that the president of the United States, The president of the United States has taken $5,000,000 or more in bribes from a foreign nation. FBI: The document has already been released Pursuant to a subpoena to the House Oversight Committee Josh Hawley: Has it been released to this committee? FBI: Work with this committee within the parameters that are established Josh Hawley: To me will you release the document to the public? It's unclassified. Don't you think the American people have a right to see it? FBI: Uh, senator, the document, as you know, contains sensitive information That has bearing on the life of the source of the information, potentially.

Reminder That Absolutely Nothing Has Come From The FBI Admitting On The Record A Document Exists Showing Joe Biden Took A $5 Million Dollar Bribe But They Can’t Release The Information Because The Whistleblower Would Be Killed Josh Hawley: You just started to answer Senator Blackburn's question that not releasing the 1023 are talking about as a matter of life and death question of life and death you said. Explain. FBI: It is potentially a question of life or death for whom regard to the source of the information Josh Hawley: So okay. So now we've confirmed that the document exists. That's progress because the FBI director initially denied that it exists. Why did he do that? FBI: We have already and previously acknowledged the existence of the documents. Josh Hawley: Yeah. After you first denied it. Now when a member of this committee read it Right. The FBI let's just get the record straight. The FBI director initially said it doesn't exist. Josh Hawley: —Why don't you just release it? Is it classified? FBI: The document is not classified. Josh Hawley: K. Will you commit to releasing it? FBI: Senator, we'll take that back, and we will work with you and this committee. Josh Hawley: How about just a yes or no? Will you commit to releasing this unclassified document that alleges that the president of the United States, The president of the United States has taken $5,000,000 or more in bribes from a foreign nation. FBI: The document has already been released Pursuant to a subpoena to the House Oversight Committee Josh Hawley: Has it been released to this committee? FBI: Work with this committee within the parameters that are established Josh Hawley: To me will you release the document to the public? It's unclassified. Don't you think the American people have a right to see it? FBI: Uh, senator, the document, as you know, contains sensitive information That has bearing on the life of the source of the information, potentially.

Wall Street Apes

641,415 次观看 • 2 年前

It’s All Coming Out. Justice Department Attorney General Merrick Garland Exposed On The Record As Overriding The FBI & Executing The Raid On Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago Home. This Is What A Weaponized Justice System Looks Like Senator Josh Hawley (Josh Hawley) “Attorney general Garland, you said in our last exchange that it's your practice to defer to FBI agents in the field. I was interested given answered to read in this morning's Washington Post that the FBI is saying that you overruled them Garland, when it came to raiding ex president Trump's personal residence, Washington Post reports this morning, showdown before the raid, that senior officials who would be in charge of leading the search resisted doing so as too combative. These field agents wanted to shutter Attorney general Garland, the criminal investigation altogether, but they were overruled by Maine DOJ.” Garland “I've skimmed that article. It is not that's not an accurate reflection of what the article says, and I'm not able to comment on the investigation. Um, my comment earlier was about tactics, uh, on the ground in particular ASES.” Hawley “Wait. Wait. Wait. Wait. Wait. Wait. You said it's not an I'm I'm reading to you from the article. Quote, senior FBI officials who would be in charge of leading the search resisted the plan as to combat it and proposed instead to seek Trump's permission to seek his property according to 4 people, end quote.” Garland There is often a robust discussion, and in the end and it's encouraged Uh, attorney general Garland. Among investigators and prosecutors? Hawley Yes. And you made the decision. Garland I did. That's Hawley Right? You said you did. Garland No. I'm sorry. What I said was I approved the decision. Hawley So you didn't make the decision. I rape. Garland I approve the decision to seek a search warrant after probable cause with Hawley Overruling the BI agents who did not want to do so. Did you talk about this with the White House? Garland The memorandum does not that that that that, um, Washington Post article does not say what you're saying. I'm sorry. And I'm not able to describe this in any fur Hawley Mister chairman, I'll just ask that this entire article be entered into the record. — Objection. I Hawley we can read for ourselves. Invite people to go and look. It says exactly that FBI field agents did not wanna conduct the raid, and they were overruled by DOJ. Attorney general, sells from your decisions. They're out there leaking left, right, and center and saying it wasn't us. We didn't wanna do it. He made us do it. What's that say about their confidence in your leadership? — Well, the previous senator said that they're leaking all in favor of the left. Now you're saying they're leaking all in favor of Hawley I'm asking you my question. Answer my question based on this evidence. Don't dissemble, attorney general. Has expired. Answer my question. — Time has expired. Senator Cotton.

It’s All Coming Out. Justice Department Attorney General Merrick Garland Exposed On The Record As Overriding The FBI & Executing The Raid On Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago Home. This Is What A Weaponized Justice System Looks Like Senator Josh Hawley (Josh Hawley) “Attorney general Garland, you said in our last exchange that it's your practice to defer to FBI agents in the field. I was interested given answered to read in this morning's Washington Post that the FBI is saying that you overruled them Garland, when it came to raiding ex president Trump's personal residence, Washington Post reports this morning, showdown before the raid, that senior officials who would be in charge of leading the search resisted doing so as too combative. These field agents wanted to shutter Attorney general Garland, the criminal investigation altogether, but they were overruled by Maine DOJ.” Garland “I've skimmed that article. It is not that's not an accurate reflection of what the article says, and I'm not able to comment on the investigation. Um, my comment earlier was about tactics, uh, on the ground in particular ASES.” Hawley “Wait. Wait. Wait. Wait. Wait. Wait. You said it's not an I'm I'm reading to you from the article. Quote, senior FBI officials who would be in charge of leading the search resisted the plan as to combat it and proposed instead to seek Trump's permission to seek his property according to 4 people, end quote.” Garland There is often a robust discussion, and in the end and it's encouraged Uh, attorney general Garland. Among investigators and prosecutors? Hawley Yes. And you made the decision. Garland I did. That's Hawley Right? You said you did. Garland No. I'm sorry. What I said was I approved the decision. Hawley So you didn't make the decision. I rape. Garland I approve the decision to seek a search warrant after probable cause with Hawley Overruling the BI agents who did not want to do so. Did you talk about this with the White House? Garland The memorandum does not that that that that, um, Washington Post article does not say what you're saying. I'm sorry. And I'm not able to describe this in any fur Hawley Mister chairman, I'll just ask that this entire article be entered into the record. — Objection. I Hawley we can read for ourselves. Invite people to go and look. It says exactly that FBI field agents did not wanna conduct the raid, and they were overruled by DOJ. Attorney general, sells from your decisions. They're out there leaking left, right, and center and saying it wasn't us. We didn't wanna do it. He made us do it. What's that say about their confidence in your leadership? — Well, the previous senator said that they're leaking all in favor of the left. Now you're saying they're leaking all in favor of Hawley I'm asking you my question. Answer my question based on this evidence. Don't dissemble, attorney general. Has expired. Answer my question. — Time has expired. Senator Cotton.

Wall Street Apes

1,118,526 次观看 • 2 年前

A watershed moment on MS NOW — and their viewers aren’t going to like this one bit. Joe Scarborough just torched the woke wing of the Democratic Party and told them EXACTLY why they keep losing elections. Clue: the trans issue. SCARBOROUGH: “Get rid of those issues right up front, so you can then talk about the things that matter to all Americans.” “Like, for instance, you know, 85% of Americans have been saying this for ten years now, 85% of Americans don’t think that men who transition after puberty should be able to compete against women.” “That’s easy. Don’t get wrapped up on that! That’s easy!” “Right? Don’t be afraid to say that. Because if you’re afraid to say that you’re going to keep losing elections. It’s that simple.” Then Scarborough went right to the moment voters can’t unsee. “And I swear, I don’t know how Josh Hawley finds the people he finds to question…and, Claire, if you disagree with me, let me know…but when Josh Hawley asks you, or when somebody asks a Democrat, can men have babies?” “And you refuse to answer that for 30 minutes, that might be a clue why they think progressives, some progressives are disconnected with America!” “Let me give you the answer to that. It’s the key. It’s upside down. Bottom of the crossword puzzle. The correct answer is NO...” “Men can’t have babies!” “And men who transition after puberty should not be able to compete against girls in sports. This is EASY!” “Get that out of the way!” “If that’s not easy for you, DON’T run because you’re going to LOSE!”

A watershed moment on MS NOW — and their viewers aren’t going to like this one bit. Joe Scarborough just torched the woke wing of the Democratic Party and told them EXACTLY why they keep losing elections. Clue: the trans issue. SCARBOROUGH: “Get rid of those issues right up front, so you can then talk about the things that matter to all Americans.” “Like, for instance, you know, 85% of Americans have been saying this for ten years now, 85% of Americans don’t think that men who transition after puberty should be able to compete against women.” “That’s easy. Don’t get wrapped up on that! That’s easy!” “Right? Don’t be afraid to say that. Because if you’re afraid to say that you’re going to keep losing elections. It’s that simple.” Then Scarborough went right to the moment voters can’t unsee. “And I swear, I don’t know how Josh Hawley finds the people he finds to question…and, Claire, if you disagree with me, let me know…but when Josh Hawley asks you, or when somebody asks a Democrat, can men have babies?” “And you refuse to answer that for 30 minutes, that might be a clue why they think progressives, some progressives are disconnected with America!” “Let me give you the answer to that. It’s the key. It’s upside down. Bottom of the crossword puzzle. The correct answer is NO...” “Men can’t have babies!” “And men who transition after puberty should not be able to compete against girls in sports. This is EASY!” “Get that out of the way!” “If that’s not easy for you, DON’T run because you’re going to LOSE!”

Overton

231,667 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨 WOAH: Senator Mullin RIPS INTO Democrat Colleagues for being "Anti-Science" During Second RFK Jr. Hearing "I DON'T GET IT, GUYS! AREN'T WE SUPPOSED TO QUESTION SCIENCE?" "If he were Biden's pick, you'd LOVE that he's questioning the science! You would probably support his positions 100%, but because he's now on the Republican side, you guys are like, "Wait, how dare he question science." My God, if we didn't question science, where would we be today? We've always questioned science. I mean, what word we did today if we didn't ever question science? But I will say there's an issue that I have as a father of six that when my kids come out from getting their vaccines, they look like a freaking pincushion. I mean 72 vaccinations, I think there's a reason we should be questioning this. Who wouldn't want to look at everything? I don't get it guys. I don't understand your point other than the fact you just oppose him because he supports a president that you guys don't like now. I applaud him for going into the situation and saying, "Let's question something." The definition of insanity is doing the same thing, and expecting different results. Is it not true, that you're supposed to question science? Is anybody going to question the fact that that's not true?" 👏

🚨 WOAH: Senator Mullin RIPS INTO Democrat Colleagues for being "Anti-Science" During Second RFK Jr. Hearing "I DON'T GET IT, GUYS! AREN'T WE SUPPOSED TO QUESTION SCIENCE?" "If he were Biden's pick, you'd LOVE that he's questioning the science! You would probably support his positions 100%, but because he's now on the Republican side, you guys are like, "Wait, how dare he question science." My God, if we didn't question science, where would we be today? We've always questioned science. I mean, what word we did today if we didn't ever question science? But I will say there's an issue that I have as a father of six that when my kids come out from getting their vaccines, they look like a freaking pincushion. I mean 72 vaccinations, I think there's a reason we should be questioning this. Who wouldn't want to look at everything? I don't get it guys. I don't understand your point other than the fact you just oppose him because he supports a president that you guys don't like now. I applaud him for going into the situation and saying, "Let's question something." The definition of insanity is doing the same thing, and expecting different results. Is it not true, that you're supposed to question science? Is anybody going to question the fact that that's not true?" 👏

Lauren Lee

66,334 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 “Patients should not have to sue just to get a second opinion.” Dr. Mary Talley Bowden explains why she’s proposing a Second Opinion Act. If you land in a hospital where your trusted physician doesn’t have privileges, the hospital can block your doctor from treating you. As a new precinct chair, Dr. Bowden's proposal is simple: if a physician is licensed and in good standing, a patient should be able to bring their doctor into the hospital for a second opinion, regardless of privileges. Patients shouldn’t lose the right to their doctor at the hospital door. "It's just common sense, but of course we're living in a world that is severely deficient in common sense -- especially in the medical field."

🚨 “Patients should not have to sue just to get a second opinion.” Dr. Mary Talley Bowden explains why she’s proposing a Second Opinion Act. If you land in a hospital where your trusted physician doesn’t have privileges, the hospital can block your doctor from treating you. As a new precinct chair, Dr. Bowden's proposal is simple: if a physician is licensed and in good standing, a patient should be able to bring their doctor into the hospital for a second opinion, regardless of privileges. Patients shouldn’t lose the right to their doctor at the hospital door. "It's just common sense, but of course we're living in a world that is severely deficient in common sense -- especially in the medical field."

Vaccine Safety Research Foundation

16,211 次观看 • 4 个月前

Former Pfizer VP Dr. Mike Yeadon Says Digital IDs Are On The Way, Along With Massive Planned Food Shortages, Supply Chain Destruction, Debt & Death Says He Has Information That This Was “Rehearsed By The Military” & It’s “The Biggest Crime In History” “I think we're in the middle of an ongoing crime. I have no idea how long it's gonna last. I think it's I'm convinced that it will be the biggest crime in history. Uh, it's global. Uh, it has the intent of control, removing everybody's freedom. And I personally think will involve killing further millions, if not billions, of people. That makes it a pretty big competitor for the title worst crime in history. It is long planned. Uh, I won't bore you with the details, but I've definitely come across information that shows that the components of the deceased that they've used, you know, PCR, uh, exaggerated PCR testing, uh, the use of fear based messaging through the media. This stuff's been rehearsed by Militaries and the people we might think of as the spooks for at least 25 years and possibly longer. So it's long plan, very serious. Here's the thing why I'm calling you to warn. It's not going to return to the old normal. One, that's never their intention. So it's not gonna happen passively because it's not isn't an actual phenomenon that's gonna wear off. They're not going to allow it to return to normal. So if you comply with this tyranny, It will end with the loss of your liberty and probably your life. Uh, the supply chains, uh, that move materials, Uh, raw materials and finished goods around the world are being sawn through on a global scale. You only got to look at where the shipping is, where it should be, and where it actually is. And terrifyingly, the same is happening to food production worldwide. Food and fertilizer production is in the wrong place. It's deliberate. They're smashing the means of manufacturing enough calories to keep 7,800,000,000 people alive. And, you know, where do you think that's gonna end? Well, the answer is mass mass starvation, war, uh, global migration. That's that's what's gonna happen if you and everybody else Choose to do nothing at all. Uh, also economic destruction we can see happening around us. Interest rates will rise on the back of huge debts that will just cause mass bankruptcies, rolling recessions, depressions, things like that. And I would also imagine loss of confidence in the very thing called money. So any savings you've got, I think they'll just vanish. Literally, people will just say I no longer trust failing. I don't wanna accept it. And so all your savings are now worth nothing. So if you wait, I believe it will be too late. I think you already know that I'm broadly telling you something that's closer to the reality than what government's telling me. Uh, but I believe that we can head off the worst crimes in history by actively withdrawing our consent and and definitely not accepting these, uh, digital ID for any reason Any reason, if you accept it, they they will sweep over us. Um, and so just in the last few words, I implore you to get involved to use some of what I and others are saying to you. Uh, be brave, actually. You have to be brave now and risk embarrassment, um, and recruits other people to this cause and we can roll hope”

Former Pfizer VP Dr. Mike Yeadon Says Digital IDs Are On The Way, Along With Massive Planned Food Shortages, Supply Chain Destruction, Debt & Death Says He Has Information That This Was “Rehearsed By The Military” & It’s “The Biggest Crime In History” “I think we're in the middle of an ongoing crime. I have no idea how long it's gonna last. I think it's I'm convinced that it will be the biggest crime in history. Uh, it's global. Uh, it has the intent of control, removing everybody's freedom. And I personally think will involve killing further millions, if not billions, of people. That makes it a pretty big competitor for the title worst crime in history. It is long planned. Uh, I won't bore you with the details, but I've definitely come across information that shows that the components of the deceased that they've used, you know, PCR, uh, exaggerated PCR testing, uh, the use of fear based messaging through the media. This stuff's been rehearsed by Militaries and the people we might think of as the spooks for at least 25 years and possibly longer. So it's long plan, very serious. Here's the thing why I'm calling you to warn. It's not going to return to the old normal. One, that's never their intention. So it's not gonna happen passively because it's not isn't an actual phenomenon that's gonna wear off. They're not going to allow it to return to normal. So if you comply with this tyranny, It will end with the loss of your liberty and probably your life. Uh, the supply chains, uh, that move materials, Uh, raw materials and finished goods around the world are being sawn through on a global scale. You only got to look at where the shipping is, where it should be, and where it actually is. And terrifyingly, the same is happening to food production worldwide. Food and fertilizer production is in the wrong place. It's deliberate. They're smashing the means of manufacturing enough calories to keep 7,800,000,000 people alive. And, you know, where do you think that's gonna end? Well, the answer is mass mass starvation, war, uh, global migration. That's that's what's gonna happen if you and everybody else Choose to do nothing at all. Uh, also economic destruction we can see happening around us. Interest rates will rise on the back of huge debts that will just cause mass bankruptcies, rolling recessions, depressions, things like that. And I would also imagine loss of confidence in the very thing called money. So any savings you've got, I think they'll just vanish. Literally, people will just say I no longer trust failing. I don't wanna accept it. And so all your savings are now worth nothing. So if you wait, I believe it will be too late. I think you already know that I'm broadly telling you something that's closer to the reality than what government's telling me. Uh, but I believe that we can head off the worst crimes in history by actively withdrawing our consent and and definitely not accepting these, uh, digital ID for any reason Any reason, if you accept it, they they will sweep over us. Um, and so just in the last few words, I implore you to get involved to use some of what I and others are saying to you. Uh, be brave, actually. You have to be brave now and risk embarrassment, um, and recruits other people to this cause and we can roll hope”

Wall Street Apes

459,391 次观看 • 2 年前

A caller says he has been in a sexless relationship for 24 years now with a woman he's deeply in love woman Jone: Okay, you married? Caller: Yes. Uh, married 20 years. John: Okay. Caller: And always have been. Um... my and the crux of the question that I'm dealing with is whether she can't address this issue or she won't. John: That's not a question I can answer, brother. Caller: I understand. John: When you've asked her when you've asked her that question, what has she said? Caller: Well, that's the problem, it's not that we have not discussed this. We discuss this on average about once a year. I will not let it go, as in just not have it just sit quietly. But she continually asks for space and she needs time. And for years I've given it. John: Yeah, you gave her a quarter century. Caller: Yeah. Yes. But it's more complicated than just we're not... well, its originally starts with her childhood traumas. John: Mhm. Caller: And uh... which, shortly after we started dating, which in which time there was no sexual issues, uh her vaginismus developed. John: Sure. Caller: Which she has never been able to address. And we went about 12 years during which time we got married and had a child, because we were intermittently able to, a handful of times... John: Okay. Caller: ...uh, be together. But... Host: When you say she wasn't able to deal with it, did she go meet with physicians and doctors and psychiatrists to work through it, or when you say we weren't able to, she just said, "Hey, this is painful. I don't want to do this," and that was the end of the story? Caller: Closer to the latter. It's not that she would not, but everything she did was with extreme reluctance and with me pulling her along to move forward. John: Yeah, that's not a way to deal with vaginismus. Okay. All right. Caller: No, it is not. (laughs) But it was greatly, greatly complicated halfway through our relationship by her uh being diagnosed with bone marrow cancer. John: Good God almighty. This poor woman.

Sensitive content

A caller says he has been in a sexless relationship for 24 years now with a woman he's deeply in love woman Jone: Okay, you married? Caller: Yes. Uh, married 20 years. John: Okay. Caller: And always have been. Um... my and the crux of the question that I'm dealing with is whether she can't address this issue or she won't. John: That's not a question I can answer, brother. Caller: I understand. John: When you've asked her when you've asked her that question, what has she said? Caller: Well, that's the problem, it's not that we have not discussed this. We discuss this on average about once a year. I will not let it go, as in just not have it just sit quietly. But she continually asks for space and she needs time. And for years I've given it. John: Yeah, you gave her a quarter century. Caller: Yeah. Yes. But it's more complicated than just we're not... well, its originally starts with her childhood traumas. John: Mhm. Caller: And uh... which, shortly after we started dating, which in which time there was no sexual issues, uh her vaginismus developed. John: Sure. Caller: Which she has never been able to address. And we went about 12 years during which time we got married and had a child, because we were intermittently able to, a handful of times... John: Okay. Caller: ...uh, be together. But... Host: When you say she wasn't able to deal with it, did she go meet with physicians and doctors and psychiatrists to work through it, or when you say we weren't able to, she just said, "Hey, this is painful. I don't want to do this," and that was the end of the story? Caller: Closer to the latter. It's not that she would not, but everything she did was with extreme reluctance and with me pulling her along to move forward. John: Yeah, that's not a way to deal with vaginismus. Okay. All right. Caller: No, it is not. (laughs) But it was greatly, greatly complicated halfway through our relationship by her uh being diagnosed with bone marrow cancer. John: Good God almighty. This poor woman.

Hecto Crypto | NetLink ⛓

55,057 次观看 • 9 天前

🚨 HOLY CRAP! BRUTAL moment as Hakeem Jeffries LOSES IT on CNBC host actually pressing him into answering the question. He just embarrassed himself big time. QUICK: -Let's not go back to what's done in the past. If you want something to get done, you NEED to do something bipartisan. JEFFRIES: YOU can ask me the question, *I'LL* provide the answer! QUICK: Answer the question instead of going back. JEFFRIES: No, no. I'm providing an answer to provide CONTEXT! QUICK: 🙄 JEFFRIES: REPUBLICANS have refused to take yes for an answer! Having this context is important regardless of what you think! QUICK: It's important context to make me realize I don't think you WANT to get a deal done. You'd like to make the rates go higher and have Republicans hang themselves with it! JEFFRIES: That is a RIDICULOUS assertion! SHAME ON YOU for saying that!! Yikes 💀

🚨 HOLY CRAP! BRUTAL moment as Hakeem Jeffries LOSES IT on CNBC host actually pressing him into answering the question. He just embarrassed himself big time. QUICK: -Let's not go back to what's done in the past. If you want something to get done, you NEED to do something bipartisan. JEFFRIES: YOU can ask me the question, I'LL provide the answer! QUICK: Answer the question instead of going back. JEFFRIES: No, no. I'm providing an answer to provide CONTEXT! QUICK: 🙄 JEFFRIES: REPUBLICANS have refused to take yes for an answer! Having this context is important regardless of what you think! QUICK: It's important context to make me realize I don't think you WANT to get a deal done. You'd like to make the rates go higher and have Republicans hang themselves with it! JEFFRIES: That is a RIDICULOUS assertion! SHAME ON YOU for saying that!! Yikes 💀

Eric Daugherty

629,592 次观看 • 7 个月前

Dr. Joseph Ladapo, Florida’s Surgeon General, exposes the troubling divide in how science is interpreted through a political lens. In a candid discussion, he highlights the stark polarization surrounding COVID-19 vaccines and masks, lamenting how ideology often trumps evidence. “I look at the data, and it’s just like, I don’t know how people can defend these positions,” Ladapo says, pointing to the inseparability of politics and science in public discourse. He specifically calls out the evidence on masks, noting that randomized clinical trials show “no benefit or maybe a tiny little benefit at best.” Yet, interpretations of this data vary wildly based on political leanings. “If you’re a researcher and lean to the right, you interpret it one way. If you lean to the left, you interpret another way,” he observes, underscoring the distortion of objective truth. This is a wake-up call: science should unite us in pursuit of facts, not divide us by ideology. When politics hijacks data, trust in institutions erodes, and public health suffers. Dr. Ladapo’s frustration is a plea for reason—can we return to evidence-based discourse, or are we too far gone?

Dr. Joseph Ladapo, Florida’s Surgeon General, exposes the troubling divide in how science is interpreted through a political lens. In a candid discussion, he highlights the stark polarization surrounding COVID-19 vaccines and masks, lamenting how ideology often trumps evidence. “I look at the data, and it’s just like, I don’t know how people can defend these positions,” Ladapo says, pointing to the inseparability of politics and science in public discourse. He specifically calls out the evidence on masks, noting that randomized clinical trials show “no benefit or maybe a tiny little benefit at best.” Yet, interpretations of this data vary wildly based on political leanings. “If you’re a researcher and lean to the right, you interpret it one way. If you lean to the left, you interpret another way,” he observes, underscoring the distortion of objective truth. This is a wake-up call: science should unite us in pursuit of facts, not divide us by ideology. When politics hijacks data, trust in institutions erodes, and public health suffers. Dr. Ladapo’s frustration is a plea for reason—can we return to evidence-based discourse, or are we too far gone?

Camus

11,420 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨BREAKING: Hannity Torches Dems for Standing by Nazi-Tattooed Misogynist Candidate – “Nobody’s Perfect” Says Bernie! "Now, tonight we have an important question. Are Democrats willing to condemn a guy who got an SSN Nazi tattoo and showed it off for years? Uh, they like to call Republicans Nazis and Gustapo and fascist." "A guy who is facing claims of serious sexual misconduct. uh including this bizarre um love of portaotties, physical intimidation uh uh claims by people, demeaning behavior towards women." "uh the horrible comments he made about women and sexual assault, a shirtless profile picture from a recently active, meaning Monday of this week, uh account on a messaging site popular with teens and tween." "So, the big question tonight, are America's self-righteous Democrats willing to withdraw support from the Nazi tattooed creep? At this point, the answer is no. " "Take a look. And I think what the people of this country want are senators now who are going to focus on the needs of working class people who are tired of a corrupt political system in which billionaires buy elections, a rigged economy in which the rich get much richer while 60% of our people struggle to put food on the table." "So, I think what the American people are saying right now is let's let candidates have the guts to take on a corrupt and broken system and maybe let's not let's understand that nobody is perfect." "The system that lets him fly around in private jets to fight the oligarchy really now. Nobody's perfect according to Bernie Sanders. Sexual misconduct, Nazi tattoos, not a big deal if you're a Democrat. Just be a socialist and communist like me."

Right Scope 🇺🇸

12,332 次观看 • 1 个月前

📌Alan Jackson didn't mince words talking to Billy Bush about the the Today Show and the ridiculous question implying Karen Read "got away with murder." Billy Bush wasn't happy with how the interview was done, and said "I'm all for devil's advocate, but this is unresearched. It's almost like people are half and half. AJ: "And it's not. It's nowhere close. " Billy Bush: "It's not even close." AJ: "Yeah, and you know what her answer would be? If that was the question that was posed, her answer is, yeah, I've got something to say. Go watch the two trials." "Watch trial one, watch trial two, and then come back and let's have a discussion." "Not one, but two juries have said she didn't do this. She is not guilty. It's not just she was found not guilty. She is innocent of it." Jackson was unequivocal: "That car did not hit and kill John O'Keefe. Every one of the credible experts said so." His message was simple: Watch the evidence before repeating narratives.

📌Alan Jackson didn't mince words talking to Billy Bush about the the Today Show and the ridiculous question implying Karen Read "got away with murder." Billy Bush wasn't happy with how the interview was done, and said "I'm all for devil's advocate, but this is unresearched. It's almost like people are half and half. AJ: "And it's not. It's nowhere close. " Billy Bush: "It's not even close." AJ: "Yeah, and you know what her answer would be? If that was the question that was posed, her answer is, yeah, I've got something to say. Go watch the two trials." "Watch trial one, watch trial two, and then come back and let's have a discussion." "Not one, but two juries have said she didn't do this. She is not guilty. It's not just she was found not guilty. She is innocent of it." Jackson was unequivocal: "That car did not hit and kill John O'Keefe. Every one of the credible experts said so." His message was simple: Watch the evidence before repeating narratives.

Kelly🍀💚

10,870 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨#Breaking BJP National Gn sec Dushyant Gautam, Rajya Sabha MP & Uttarakhand in-charge, has finally broken his silence in the Ankita Bhandari murder case. His name has surfaced as the alleged VVIP who wanted to sexually exploit Ankita (an allegation that remains subject to investigation) after she was murdered for refusing. In a video statement, with Dr Ambedkar’s photo in the background, Dushyant Gautam claimed that honesty, loyalty & character define his political and social life, and said that if any evidence is found against him, he will retire from politics and public life. All that sounds fine. But there is one simple question he must answer for Ankita to get justice: 👉 Mr Dushyant, Where were you on the night of 18th September 2022?

🚨#Breaking BJP National Gn sec Dushyant Gautam, Rajya Sabha MP & Uttarakhand in-charge, has finally broken his silence in the Ankita Bhandari murder case. His name has surfaced as the alleged VVIP who wanted to sexually exploit Ankita (an allegation that remains subject to investigation) after she was murdered for refusing. In a video statement, with Dr Ambedkar’s photo in the background, Dushyant Gautam claimed that honesty, loyalty & character define his political and social life, and said that if any evidence is found against him, he will retire from politics and public life. All that sounds fine. But there is one simple question he must answer for Ankita to get justice: 👉 Mr Dushyant, Where were you on the night of 18th September 2022?

Ritu #सत्यसाधक

84,534 次观看 • 6 个月前