正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

This probably gets deleted. I told Claude to scan GitHub for 24 hours and find Polymarket bots with real on-chain results. It found one wallet. $143,379 profit. 43,788 trades. No audience. No noise. I reverse engineered it overnight. Put in $90. Woke up to +130%. Copy it: Then I... show more

Discover

80,313 subscribers

50,622 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

This content probably won't last long I had Claude scan GitHub continuously for 24 hours, specifically hunting for those bots that actually deliver on-chain results on Polymarket In the end, I only found one wallet $143,379 in profit 43,788 trades No audience No noise I reverse-engineered it overnight Threw in $90 first Slept a night, woke up to +130% Then I tested it again This time just used $20 for copy trading Didn't touch a thing Woke up the next day, it had turned into $127 That's when I realized—this wasn't luck Every single trade of it was executing by the rules: Only trades in specific time windows Positions controlled with Kelly criterion Losses don't mean failure—they're part of the model upgrade Over 43K trades, almost no deviations GitHub shows just 14 stars But it's already pulled $143K out of the market While most people are still serving as exit liquidity for others, this thing is steadily harvesting them. You only need Claude + laptop + 1 hour/day. Giving This Free for 24 hours. To get it: 1. Comment the word 'Claude' 2. Like and Retweet this post 3. Follow me Marry Evan (so i can DM you)

This content probably won't last long I had Claude scan GitHub continuously for 24 hours, specifically hunting for those bots that actually deliver on-chain results on Polymarket In the end, I only found one wallet $143,379 in profit 43,788 trades No audience No noise I reverse-engineered it overnight Threw in $90 first Slept a night, woke up to +130% Then I tested it again This time just used $20 for copy trading Didn't touch a thing Woke up the next day, it had turned into $127 That's when I realized—this wasn't luck Every single trade of it was executing by the rules: Only trades in specific time windows Positions controlled with Kelly criterion Losses don't mean failure—they're part of the model upgrade Over 43K trades, almost no deviations GitHub shows just 14 stars But it's already pulled $143K out of the market While most people are still serving as exit liquidity for others, this thing is steadily harvesting them. You only need Claude + laptop + 1 hour/day. Giving This Free for 24 hours. To get it: 1. Comment the word 'Claude' 2. Like and Retweet this post 3. Follow me Marry Evan (so i can DM you)

Marry Evan

11,185 次观看 • 3 个月前

It started as a joke Gave Claude $20 Left it running overnight Woke up to: script finished +$95 from the first 5 trades Didn’t touch anything Then I found this wallet: 0xb27b...b82 $384,858 profit 13,070 predictions $18.5K max win active since March 2026 No hype No followers Almost no one watching So I tested it While building my system, I copytraded it $80 → $4,218 in a few weeks Every trade looked the same Same structure Same logic This isn’t trading It’s one equation repeating Examples: $17,839 → $36,318 $3,112 → $15,011 $10,676 → $22,178 Here’s what I gave Claude: Trade BTC windows with clear edge Size by probability Skip high volatility Update after every trade That’s it No babysitting No emotions Just structure Copy it: You’re early That won’t last

It started as a joke Gave Claude $20 Left it running overnight Woke up to: script finished +$95 from the first 5 trades Didn’t touch anything Then I found this wallet: 0xb27b...b82 $384,858 profit 13,070 predictions $18.5K max win active since March 2026 No hype No followers Almost no one watching So I tested it While building my system, I copytraded it $80 → $4,218 in a few weeks Every trade looked the same Same structure Same logic This isn’t trading It’s one equation repeating Examples: $17,839 → $36,318 $3,112 → $15,011 $10,676 → $22,178 Here’s what I gave Claude: Trade BTC windows with clear edge Size by probability Skip high volatility Update after every trade That’s it No babysitting No emotions Just structure Copy it: You’re early That won’t last

Discover

16,237 次观看 • 3 个月前

$It worked. Gave Claude $20. Left it coding overnight. Woke up to: • finished script • +$95 from first 5 trades Didn’t touch anything. Then I found this wallet: 0xb27b...b82 • $384,858 profit • 13,070 predictions • $18.5K biggest win • Started March 2026 Almost no one watching it. While building my script, I copytraded it to test the math. Started with $80. → $4,218 in a few weeks Every position is identical in structure. Not trading. One equation. Running while you sleep. Examples: $17,839 → $36,318 (+103%) $3,112 → $15,011 (+382%) $10,676 → $22,178 (+107%) Here’s the exact framework I gave Claude: 1. Temporal bias Find BTC time windows with >65% directional edge. Ignore everything else. 2. Kelly sizing Size based on confidence. Never fixed bets. f∗=p⋅b−qbf^* = \frac{p \cdot b - q}{b}f∗=bp⋅b−q 3. Volatility filter Skip trades when volatility is too high. Only clean conditions. 4. Bayesian updates Update probabilities after every trade. The system learns. Claude built everything while I slept. Funded it with $20. First trade fired minutes later. Copytrade my finds → You’re seeing this early. That window doesn’t stay open.$

It worked. Gave Claude $20. Left it coding overnight. Woke up to: • finished script • +$95 from first 5 trades Didn’t touch anything. Then I found this wallet: 0xb27b...b82 • $384,858 profit • 13,070 predictions • $18.5K biggest win • Started March 2026 Almost no one watching it. While building my script, I copytraded it to test the math. Started with $80. → $4,218 in a few weeks Every position is identical in structure. Not trading. One equation. Running while you sleep. Examples: $17,839 → $36,318 (+103%) $3,112 → $15,011 (+382%) $10,676 → $22,178 (+107%) Here’s the exact framework I gave Claude: 1. Temporal bias Find BTC time windows with >65% directional edge. Ignore everything else. 2. Kelly sizing Size based on confidence. Never fixed bets. f∗=p⋅b−qbf^* = \frac{p \cdot b - q}{b}f∗=bp⋅b−q 3. Volatility filter Skip trades when volatility is too high. Only clean conditions. 4. Bayesian updates Update probabilities after every trade. The system learns. Claude built everything while I slept. Funded it with $20. First trade fired minutes later. Copytrade my finds → You’re seeing this early. That window doesn’t stay open.

Discover

980,721 次观看 • 4 个月前

$It worked. Gave Claude $20. Left it coding overnight. Woke up to: • finished script • +$95 from first 5 trades Didn’t touch anything. Then I found this wallet: 0xb27b...b82 • $384,858 profit • 13,070 predictions • $18.5K biggest win • Started March 2026 Almost no one watching it. While building my script, I copytraded it to test the math. Started with $80. → $4,218 in a few weeks Every position is identical in structure. Not trading. One equation. Running while you sleep. Examples: $17,839 → $36,318 (+103%) $3,112 → $15,011 (+382%) $10,676 → $22,178 (+107%) Here’s the exact framework I gave Claude: 1. Temporal bias Find BTC time windows with >65% directional edge. Ignore everything else. 2. Kelly sizing Size based on confidence. Never fixed bets. f∗=p⋅b−qbf^* = \frac{p \cdot b - q}{b}f∗=bp⋅b−q 3. Volatility filter Skip trades when volatility is too high. Only clean conditions. 4. Bayesian updates Update probabilities after every trade. The system learns. Claude built everything while I slept. Funded it with $20. First trade fired minutes later. Copytrade my finds → You’re seeing this early. That window doesn’t stay open.$

It worked. Gave Claude $20. Left it coding overnight. Woke up to: • finished script • +$95 from first 5 trades Didn’t touch anything. Then I found this wallet: 0xb27b...b82 • $384,858 profit • 13,070 predictions • $18.5K biggest win • Started March 2026 Almost no one watching it. While building my script, I copytraded it to test the math. Started with $80. → $4,218 in a few weeks Every position is identical in structure. Not trading. One equation. Running while you sleep. Examples: $17,839 → $36,318 (+103%) $3,112 → $15,011 (+382%) $10,676 → $22,178 (+107%) Here’s the exact framework I gave Claude: 1. Temporal bias Find BTC time windows with >65% directional edge. Ignore everything else. 2. Kelly sizing Size based on confidence. Never fixed bets. f∗=p⋅b−qbf^* = \frac{p \cdot b - q}{b}f∗=bp⋅b−q 3. Volatility filter Skip trades when volatility is too high. Only clean conditions. 4. Bayesian updates Update probabilities after every trade. The system learns. Claude built everything while I slept. Funded it with $20. First trade fired minutes later. Copytrade my finds → You’re seeing this early. That window doesn’t stay open.

Discover

380,971 次观看 • 4 个月前

It worked. Gave Claude $20. Left it coding overnight. Woke up to: • finished script • +$95 from first 5 trades Didn’t touch anything. Then I found this wallet: 0xb27b...b82 • $384,858 profit • 13,070 predictions • $18.5K biggest win • Started March 2026 Almost no one is watching it. While building my script, I copytraded it to test the math. Started with $80. → $4,218 in a few weeks Every position is identical in structure. Not trading. One equation. Running while you sleep. Examples: $17,839 → $36,318 (+103%) $3,112 → $15,011 (+382%) $10,676 → $22,178 (+107%) Here’s the exact framework I gave Claude: 1. Temporal bias Find BTC time windows with >65% edge. Ignore everything else. 2. Kelly sizing Size based on confidence. Never fixed bets. f* = (p × b − q) / b 3. Volatility filter Skip high volatility. Trade only clean conditions. 4. Bayesian updates Update probabilities after each trade. The system improves over time. Claude built everything while I slept. Funded it with $20. First trade fired minutes later. You’re seeing this early. That window doesn’t stay open. You only need Claude + Device + 1 hour/day. Giving This Free for 24 hours. To get it: 1. Comment the word 'CLAUDE' 2. Like and Retweet this post 3. Follow me Marry Evan (so i can DM you)

It worked. Gave Claude $20. Left it coding overnight. Woke up to: • finished script • +$95 from first 5 trades Didn’t touch anything. Then I found this wallet: 0xb27b...b82 • $384,858 profit • 13,070 predictions • $18.5K biggest win • Started March 2026 Almost no one is watching it. While building my script, I copytraded it to test the math. Started with $80. → $4,218 in a few weeks Every position is identical in structure. Not trading. One equation. Running while you sleep. Examples: $17,839 → $36,318 (+103%) $3,112 → $15,011 (+382%) $10,676 → $22,178 (+107%) Here’s the exact framework I gave Claude: 1. Temporal bias Find BTC time windows with >65% edge. Ignore everything else. 2. Kelly sizing Size based on confidence. Never fixed bets. f* = (p × b − q) / b 3. Volatility filter Skip high volatility. Trade only clean conditions. 4. Bayesian updates Update probabilities after each trade. The system improves over time. Claude built everything while I slept. Funded it with $20. First trade fired minutes later. You’re seeing this early. That window doesn’t stay open. You only need Claude + Device + 1 hour/day. Giving This Free for 24 hours. To get it: 1. Comment the word 'CLAUDE' 2. Like and Retweet this post 3. Follow me Marry Evan (so i can DM you)

Marry Evan

169,060 次观看 • 3 个月前

An Anthropic engineer watched me trade from across the table at a WeWork in SF I had my laptop open. Four agents running. Green charts. Live trades scrolling. He was on a Zoom call. Muted himself. Walked over. "Are you running Claude against live prediction markets right now" I told him. Claude Code. Two repos. $25 a month. He pulled up a chair. "I helped build the model you're using. I've never seen anyone wire it to live trades like this" I showed him the dataset. 86 million trades. Every wallet. Every entry. Every exit. He stared at it. "We tested this internally. You give Claude a dataset and don't tell it what to look for. It finds the winning wallets. Then it finds WHY they win. Then it copies the pattern. We never shipped it because legal killed it" I told him I did exactly that. One weekend. Claude Code found the exit logic on its own. Top wallets exit before resolution 91% of the time. They capture 86% of expected value. Cut losers at 12%. Everyone else captures 58% and holds to 41%. "That's the exact finding from our internal eval. Except ours took a team of eight and four months" I showed him the scanner. Three commands. 500+ markets. No API key. Claude scores them all in 20 minutes. "You're using our model to beat markets we're not allowed to touch. On infra that costs less than my lunch" My setup: Claude API - $20/mo VPS - $5/mo poly_data - free polymarket-cli - free 214 trades. 74% win rate. +$9,400. 19 days. I showed him the full breakdown. Every repo. Every command. Every dollar. Copytrade here: He read it for five minutes. Then looked up. "If my manager sees this he's going to lose his mind. You just proved our model works in production and we've been sitting on it for a year" He DM'd me that night. "Take this down before someone at Anthropic finds it" Too late.

An Anthropic engineer watched me trade from across the table at a WeWork in SF I had my laptop open. Four agents running. Green charts. Live trades scrolling. He was on a Zoom call. Muted himself. Walked over. "Are you running Claude against live prediction markets right now" I told him. Claude Code. Two repos. $25 a month. He pulled up a chair. "I helped build the model you're using. I've never seen anyone wire it to live trades like this" I showed him the dataset. 86 million trades. Every wallet. Every entry. Every exit. He stared at it. "We tested this internally. You give Claude a dataset and don't tell it what to look for. It finds the winning wallets. Then it finds WHY they win. Then it copies the pattern. We never shipped it because legal killed it" I told him I did exactly that. One weekend. Claude Code found the exit logic on its own. Top wallets exit before resolution 91% of the time. They capture 86% of expected value. Cut losers at 12%. Everyone else captures 58% and holds to 41%. "That's the exact finding from our internal eval. Except ours took a team of eight and four months" I showed him the scanner. Three commands. 500+ markets. No API key. Claude scores them all in 20 minutes. "You're using our model to beat markets we're not allowed to touch. On infra that costs less than my lunch" My setup: Claude API - $20/mo VPS - $5/mo poly_data - free polymarket-cli - free 214 trades. 74% win rate. +$9,400. 19 days. I showed him the full breakdown. Every repo. Every command. Every dollar. Copytrade here: He read it for five minutes. Then looked up. "If my manager sees this he's going to lose his mind. You just proved our model works in production and we've been sitting on it for a year" He DM'd me that night. "Take this down before someone at Anthropic finds it" Too late.

Lunar

224,021 次观看 • 4 个月前

I spent 48h to find this ''bot trading wallet'' on Polymarket He made 10,057 trades in one month and earned $87,000 > this wallet is an arbitrage bot > trades only BTC Up or Down (5 min) only > always use the same strategy And here's how it trades: > waits until one of the outcomes (YES/NO) falls below 35¢ > buy more when the average price is low > watch how the opposite outcome moves > makes sure the total average prices are under 99¢ > if he doesn't have a hedge, just closing the position with no losses This is exactly how algo-trading works His profile:

sopersone

36,813 次观看 • 19 天前

I'm quitting my job to go full-in on Claude. Just Asked it to: Analyze mispriced Polymarket markets for arbitrage opportunities and find wallets using it to copy. Turned $2K into $12K overnight. Monitored 1,000+ wallets. I realized something fast. There are arbitrage bots I can't beat without code knowledge. But I can find them. And copy them. Claude built a monitoring terminal and connected it to a Telegram copytrading bot. It's not a script. Not even a bot. It's an AI agent that improves with every wallet it finds. Fetches wallet behavior. How it trades. Arbitrage patterns. Position sizing. Timing. 70% win rate. 7 wallets copytrading right now from 500+ monitored. Bot never pauses. Never gambles. Just math and profit. You only need: Claude + a device + 1 hour per day. Giving this free for 24 hours. To get it: 1. Comment "cash" 2. Like and retweet this 3. Follow me Himanshu Kumar so I can DM you

I'm quitting my job to go full-in on Claude. Just Asked it to: Analyze mispriced Polymarket markets for arbitrage opportunities and find wallets using it to copy. Turned $2K into $12K overnight. Monitored 1,000+ wallets. I realized something fast. There are arbitrage bots I can't beat without code knowledge. But I can find them. And copy them. Claude built a monitoring terminal and connected it to a Telegram copytrading bot. It's not a script. Not even a bot. It's an AI agent that improves with every wallet it finds. Fetches wallet behavior. How it trades. Arbitrage patterns. Position sizing. Timing. 70% win rate. 7 wallets copytrading right now from 500+ monitored. Bot never pauses. Never gambles. Just math and profit. You only need: Claude + a device + 1 hour per day. Giving this free for 24 hours. To get it: 1. Comment "cash" 2. Like and retweet this 3. Follow me Himanshu Kumar so I can DM you

Himanshu Kumar

196,779 次观看 • 2 个月前

An OpenAI engineer stopped me at a hackathon in Hayes Valley I had my terminal open on a table. Three panels. Live trades scrolling. He was walking past and froze. "That's not a demo. That's a live scoring engine. What model is that" I told him. Claude Opus 4.7. Four repos. $25 a month. He pulled up a chair without asking. "We benchmarked Opus 4.7 internally. It beat o3 on structured reasoning across every eval we ran. And you're telling me you're using it to trade" I told him it does more than trade. It reads 86 million trades and finds who wins and why. No fine-tuning. No prompting chains. Just raw context. He leaned back. "Show me the data source" I opened one link. 86 million trades. Every wallet. Every entry. Every exit. "You point Opus 4.7 at this and it reverse-engineers the strategy. It finds the wallets that win. Then it finds why they win. Then it copies the pattern" His team spent 14 months building something similar. 10 engineers. Custom infra. Still in staging. "The part that killed us was exit timing. Every model we trained nailed entries. But the best traders exit before the crowd. We never figured out the threshold" I told him my bot cuts at 85% of expected move. Or on a 3x volume spike. Whichever comes first. He stopped talking. "How did you find that" Opus 4.7 found it in poly_data. Top wallets exit before resolution 86% of the time. Losers hold to 58%. Exits are the entire game. I opened another tab. "Three commands. 500 markets. Opus scores them in 20 minutes" "That's our internal eval pipeline. Except it took us a year and you did it in a weekend with our competitor's model" My setup: Claude Opus 4.7 - $20/mo VPS - $5/mo poly_data - free polymarket-cli - free 214 trades. 74% win rate. +$9,400 in 19 days. Copytrade here: I showed him the article where I broke down every repo and every command. He read it twice. Then looked up. "You just published what we've been trying to ship for six months. Using the other team's model" He texted me the next day. "My manager found your thread. Delete it" Too late.

An OpenAI engineer stopped me at a hackathon in Hayes Valley I had my terminal open on a table. Three panels. Live trades scrolling. He was walking past and froze. "That's not a demo. That's a live scoring engine. What model is that" I told him. Claude Opus 4.7. Four repos. $25 a month. He pulled up a chair without asking. "We benchmarked Opus 4.7 internally. It beat o3 on structured reasoning across every eval we ran. And you're telling me you're using it to trade" I told him it does more than trade. It reads 86 million trades and finds who wins and why. No fine-tuning. No prompting chains. Just raw context. He leaned back. "Show me the data source" I opened one link. 86 million trades. Every wallet. Every entry. Every exit. "You point Opus 4.7 at this and it reverse-engineers the strategy. It finds the wallets that win. Then it finds why they win. Then it copies the pattern" His team spent 14 months building something similar. 10 engineers. Custom infra. Still in staging. "The part that killed us was exit timing. Every model we trained nailed entries. But the best traders exit before the crowd. We never figured out the threshold" I told him my bot cuts at 85% of expected move. Or on a 3x volume spike. Whichever comes first. He stopped talking. "How did you find that" Opus 4.7 found it in poly_data. Top wallets exit before resolution 86% of the time. Losers hold to 58%. Exits are the entire game. I opened another tab. "Three commands. 500 markets. Opus scores them in 20 minutes" "That's our internal eval pipeline. Except it took us a year and you did it in a weekend with our competitor's model" My setup: Claude Opus 4.7 - $20/mo VPS - $5/mo poly_data - free polymarket-cli - free 214 trades. 74% win rate. +$9,400 in 19 days. Copytrade here: I showed him the article where I broke down every repo and every command. He read it twice. Then looked up. "You just published what we've been trying to ship for six months. Using the other team's model" He texted me the next day. "My manager found your thread. Delete it" Too late.

Lunar

136,549 次观看 • 4 个月前

$25K+ profit daily from 1 wallet, with OpenClaw. I have the exact step-by-step guide, giving it free for 24 hours. To get it: 1. Comment "OpenClaw" 2. Like and Retweet. 3. Follow me Himanshu Kumar ( So, i can send you DM) I ran a simple script last night with Claude Code. Pull on-chain data from Polymarket, sort by win rate on 15 minute BTC markets. 20 minutes later, 100s of wallets showed up. Most were losing money or barely breaking even. Then I spotted 1 address. 200+ trades daily, every single week profitable, timing so precise it looked robotic. Because it is. I fed the wallet address back into Claude Code. Asked it to reverse engineer the strategy. 20 mins later the full breakdown appeared on my screen. Here is how it works: Bot monitors Binance and Bybit every 100ms. Waiting for BTC volatility compression to drop below 0.08%. When it hits that level, it buys both Up and Down contracts at 25 to 35 cents each. Classic straddle play. 1 contract loses, the other rockets to a dollar. Entry at 30 cents means 3x to 4x return every time. Repeats dozens of times per day. Result: $13K to $25K profit daily from 1 wallet. No human intuition, no insider tips. Just an algorithm exploiting a gap in market mechanics. I searched to see if anyone else found this wallet. Turns out yes. There is a Telegram bot that auto-copies trades from wallets like this. I connected it to the same address. Every entry matched what my terminal showed. You can now copy-trade an algorithm in real time. That capability did not exist 12 months ago. Comment "OpenClaw" and I will send you everything. Must Follow me Himanshu Kumar to get the DM.

$25K+ profit daily from 1 wallet, with OpenClaw. I have the exact step-by-step guide, giving it free for 24 hours. To get it: 1. Comment "OpenClaw" 2. Like and Retweet. 3. Follow me Himanshu Kumar ( So, i can send you DM) I ran a simple script last night with Claude Code. Pull on-chain data from Polymarket, sort by win rate on 15 minute BTC markets. 20 minutes later, 100s of wallets showed up. Most were losing money or barely breaking even. Then I spotted 1 address. 200+ trades daily, every single week profitable, timing so precise it looked robotic. Because it is. I fed the wallet address back into Claude Code. Asked it to reverse engineer the strategy. 20 mins later the full breakdown appeared on my screen. Here is how it works: Bot monitors Binance and Bybit every 100ms. Waiting for BTC volatility compression to drop below 0.08%. When it hits that level, it buys both Up and Down contracts at 25 to 35 cents each. Classic straddle play. 1 contract loses, the other rockets to a dollar. Entry at 30 cents means 3x to 4x return every time. Repeats dozens of times per day. Result: $13K to $25K profit daily from 1 wallet. No human intuition, no insider tips. Just an algorithm exploiting a gap in market mechanics. I searched to see if anyone else found this wallet. Turns out yes. There is a Telegram bot that auto-copies trades from wallets like this. I connected it to the same address. Every entry matched what my terminal showed. You can now copy-trade an algorithm in real time. That capability did not exist 12 months ago. Comment "OpenClaw" and I will send you everything. Must Follow me Himanshu Kumar to get the DM.

Himanshu Kumar

13,188 次观看 • 5 个月前

My dad told me I was wasting my life using Claude to analyze Polymarket wallets instead of "learning real trading" 2 weeks later he asked me why one weather market suddenly made someone $11,000 overnight. I didn’t know how to explain to him that half the market is now bots reacting to each other. So I started digging through GitHub trying to understand how deep this rabbit hole actually goes. The first repo that caught my attention was: A few hours later I found people building autonomous agents for Polymarket: That’s when the entire platform started looking different to me. One wallet made $87k trading weather markets. Another was making hundreds of trades a day while barely holding positions longer than 90 minutes. The highest-performing wallets didn’t even look human anymore. No emotional entries. No hesitation. No scrolling Twitter waiting for opinions. Just instant reactions to forecast changes, liquidity shifts and crowd behavior. Then I found this: And suddenly it clicked. Most people on Polymarket still think they’re trading events. They’re not. They’re trading how millions of emotional humans react to events in real time. Huge difference. One wallet I tracked kept entering positions BEFORE major sentiment swings happened. At first I thought it was luck. Then I realized the bot was monitoring forecast disagreements, Twitter activity and liquidity changes simultaneously. Humans physically cannot process information that fast anymore. Here wallet: The scary part is that almost all of this infrastructure is public. Most people just never open GitHub long enough to notice what's happening.

My dad told me I was wasting my life using Claude to analyze Polymarket wallets instead of "learning real trading" 2 weeks later he asked me why one weather market suddenly made someone $11,000 overnight. I didn’t know how to explain to him that half the market is now bots reacting to each other. So I started digging through GitHub trying to understand how deep this rabbit hole actually goes. The first repo that caught my attention was: A few hours later I found people building autonomous agents for Polymarket: That’s when the entire platform started looking different to me. One wallet made $87k trading weather markets. Another was making hundreds of trades a day while barely holding positions longer than 90 minutes. The highest-performing wallets didn’t even look human anymore. No emotional entries. No hesitation. No scrolling Twitter waiting for opinions. Just instant reactions to forecast changes, liquidity shifts and crowd behavior. Then I found this: And suddenly it clicked. Most people on Polymarket still think they’re trading events. They’re not. They’re trading how millions of emotional humans react to events in real time. Huge difference. One wallet I tracked kept entering positions BEFORE major sentiment swings happened. At first I thought it was luck. Then I realized the bot was monitoring forecast disagreements, Twitter activity and liquidity changes simultaneously. Humans physically cannot process information that fast anymore. Here wallet: The scary part is that almost all of this infrastructure is public. Most people just never open GitHub long enough to notice what's happening.

Lunar

54,853 次观看 • 2 个月前

I’M QUITTING MY JOB TO GO ALL-IN ON CLAUDE Just told it: “Find mispriced Polymarket markets wallets exploiting arbitrage and build me a way to copy them” $2K → $12K in one night. No signals. No guessing. It scanned 1,000+ wallets Tracked behavior, timing, sizing Then filtered the ones that actually have edge. I realized something: You can’t beat these bots without code. But you don’t have to. You just copy them. So Claude built a monitoring terminal. → finds profitable wallets → tracks their trades in real time → executes through a TG copytrading bot Bot: This isn’t a script. It’s an AI agent that improves with every wallet it analyzes. → learns behavior → detects arbitrage patterns → adapts sizing + timing Now running: • ~500 wallets monitored • 7 actively copytraded • ~70% win rate Never sleeps. Never hesitates. Never gambles. Just math. Giving This Free for 24 hours. To get it: 1. Comment the word 'Claude' 2. Like and Retweet this post 3. Follow me Discover (so i can DM you)

I’M QUITTING MY JOB TO GO ALL-IN ON CLAUDE Just told it: “Find mispriced Polymarket markets wallets exploiting arbitrage and build me a way to copy them” $2K → $12K in one night. No signals. No guessing. It scanned 1,000+ wallets Tracked behavior, timing, sizing Then filtered the ones that actually have edge. I realized something: You can’t beat these bots without code. But you don’t have to. You just copy them. So Claude built a monitoring terminal. → finds profitable wallets → tracks their trades in real time → executes through a TG copytrading bot Bot: This isn’t a script. It’s an AI agent that improves with every wallet it analyzes. → learns behavior → detects arbitrage patterns → adapts sizing + timing Now running: • ~500 wallets monitored • 7 actively copytraded • ~70% win rate Never sleeps. Never hesitates. Never gambles. Just math. Giving This Free for 24 hours. To get it: 1. Comment the word 'Claude' 2. Like and Retweet this post 3. Follow me Discover (so i can DM you)

Discover

338,977 次观看 • 4 个月前

This Polymarket trader fooled EVERYONE. Almost 100% win rate. By trading against bots. And yes, he went from $0.10 to $300k in 2 days. Only 41 trades to do it. Here’s his secret: He doesn’t trade direction, only liquidity. He shows up only at night and on weekends, when books are thin and bots run on autopilot. That’s when even small size can move price way more than it should. He intentionally pushes contracts into bad prices so bots are forced to react. They sell into him at terrible levels because their models are blind to context. Once bots are trapped, he builds size against the real probability. Then he lets price snap back to fair value. No secret info and no prediction edge. Just understanding how bots behave under stress. Just as i warned you months ago: Most Polymarket money isn’t made by being right. It’s made by being faster and meaner than bots. This guy is living proof. Monitor his trades:

This Polymarket trader fooled EVERYONE. Almost 100% win rate. By trading against bots. And yes, he went from $0.10 to $300k in 2 days. Only 41 trades to do it. Here’s his secret: He doesn’t trade direction, only liquidity. He shows up only at night and on weekends, when books are thin and bots run on autopilot. That’s when even small size can move price way more than it should. He intentionally pushes contracts into bad prices so bots are forced to react. They sell into him at terrible levels because their models are blind to context. Once bots are trapped, he builds size against the real probability. Then he lets price snap back to fair value. No secret info and no prediction edge. Just understanding how bots behave under stress. Just as i warned you months ago: Most Polymarket money isn’t made by being right. It’s made by being faster and meaner than bots. This guy is living proof. Monitor his trades:

Oracle Boar

181,124 次观看 • 6 个月前

My girlfriend asked why I had 14 Polymarket tabs open tracking rainfall at 3 AM instead of sleeping. An hour later one wallet made $7,200 because NOAA changed a forecast before Twitter noticed. That was the entire trade. I started digging through GitHub trying to understand how these wallets react so absurdly fast. The first repo that caught my attention was: A few hours later I found people building autonomous agents for Polymarket: That’s when the whole platform started looking different to me. One wallet made $64k trading weather markets. Another was making hundreds of trades a day while barely holding positions longer than an hour. The highest-performing wallets didn’t even look human anymore. No hesitation. No emotional entries. No scrolling Twitter waiting for opinions. Just instant reactions to forecast updates, liquidity shifts and crowd behavior. Then I found this: And suddenly it clicked. Most people on Polymarket still think they’re trading events. They’re not. They’re trading how long it takes emotional humans to react to events. Huge difference. One wallet I tracked kept entering positions before major sentiment swings happened. At first I thought it was luck. Then I realized the bot was monitoring NOAA revisions, Twitter activity and liquidity changes simultaneously. Humans physically cannot process information that fast anymore. Copytrade wallet: The scary part is that almost all of this infrastructure is public. Most people just never open GitHub long enough to notice what's happening.

My girlfriend asked why I had 14 Polymarket tabs open tracking rainfall at 3 AM instead of sleeping. An hour later one wallet made $7,200 because NOAA changed a forecast before Twitter noticed. That was the entire trade. I started digging through GitHub trying to understand how these wallets react so absurdly fast. The first repo that caught my attention was: A few hours later I found people building autonomous agents for Polymarket: That’s when the whole platform started looking different to me. One wallet made $64k trading weather markets. Another was making hundreds of trades a day while barely holding positions longer than an hour. The highest-performing wallets didn’t even look human anymore. No hesitation. No emotional entries. No scrolling Twitter waiting for opinions. Just instant reactions to forecast updates, liquidity shifts and crowd behavior. Then I found this: And suddenly it clicked. Most people on Polymarket still think they’re trading events. They’re not. They’re trading how long it takes emotional humans to react to events. Huge difference. One wallet I tracked kept entering positions before major sentiment swings happened. At first I thought it was luck. Then I realized the bot was monitoring NOAA revisions, Twitter activity and liquidity changes simultaneously. Humans physically cannot process information that fast anymore. Copytrade wallet: The scary part is that almost all of this infrastructure is public. Most people just never open GitHub long enough to notice what's happening.

Lunar

52,892 次观看 • 2 个月前

Polymarket pays me $400 a day because it's slower than Binance by 2 seconds. And this is just the beginning - while I was writing this post, the bot made another $40. Let me explain. I built a bot on OpenClaw. It monitors Binance 24/7. Sees a sharp impulse - switches to high attention mode. If price doesn't snap back within a second (the impulse could be a squeeze) - it opens a trade on Polymarket in the same direction. Why this works. When BTC moves sharply, Polymarket odds don't have time to adjust. These windows appear every day - especially now, with elevated volatility across financial markets. I usually enter when the gap is 200+ points. Odds are still stale - I capture the spread before it closes. Aggressive mode - spreads from 100 points, significantly more trades per day. $20 per trade. 10-30 trades a day. Morning. Coffee. Open the laptop. The bot closed 14 trades overnight. Another good day

Polymarket pays me $400 a day because it's slower than Binance by 2 seconds. And this is just the beginning - while I was writing this post, the bot made another $40. Let me explain. I built a bot on OpenClaw. It monitors Binance 24/7. Sees a sharp impulse - switches to high attention mode. If price doesn't snap back within a second (the impulse could be a squeeze) - it opens a trade on Polymarket in the same direction. Why this works. When BTC moves sharply, Polymarket odds don't have time to adjust. These windows appear every day - especially now, with elevated volatility across financial markets. I usually enter when the gap is 200+ points. Odds are still stale - I capture the spread before it closes. Aggressive mode - spreads from 100 points, significantly more trades per day. $20 per trade. 10-30 trades a day. Morning. Coffee. Open the laptop. The bot closed 14 trades overnight. Another good day

may.crypto {🦅}

70,267 次观看 • 5 个月前

This trader gave Claude $44 and one question. Not “what should I build.” Not “how do bots work.” He asked: what’s the easiest way to consistently extract money from short-term mispricing. No lecture. No disclaimer. No theory. It said: find small windows where the market is off by a few percent. Quietly. Repeatedly. At scale. Then it dropped a wallet. stargate5 $165,618 profit 16,279 trades Joined November 2025 He almost skipped it. Then he opened the activity. No predictions. No narratives. Just micro trades on 5–15 minute windows. Over and over and over. Tiny edges. Constant flow. The entire strategy: scan for mispricing above ~6% enter instantly redeem at $1 repeat. He asked Claude how this keeps working. It said: you don’t need big wins. You need a small edge executed thousands of times at near-even conditions. Volume handles the rest. He asked: what kind of capital this started with. Claude: based on sizing — probably under $1,000. Compounding did the rest. He went through the trades manually. Same pattern every time: short window mispriced odds fast execution instant settlement No randomness. No luck. The same edge, repeated 16,279 times until it turned into $165K. He asked Claude one last thing. What do you call this strategy? It said: capturing the gap between panic pricing and actual probability on repeat. At scale, that gap becomes income. Still running. You only need Claude + laptop + 1 hour/day. Giving This Free for 24 hours. To get it: 1. Comment the word 'Trade' 2. Like and Retweet this post 3. Follow me Marry Evan (so i can DM you)

This trader gave Claude $44 and one question. Not “what should I build.” Not “how do bots work.” He asked: what’s the easiest way to consistently extract money from short-term mispricing. No lecture. No disclaimer. No theory. It said: find small windows where the market is off by a few percent. Quietly. Repeatedly. At scale. Then it dropped a wallet. stargate5 $165,618 profit 16,279 trades Joined November 2025 He almost skipped it. Then he opened the activity. No predictions. No narratives. Just micro trades on 5–15 minute windows. Over and over and over. Tiny edges. Constant flow. The entire strategy: scan for mispricing above ~6% enter instantly redeem at $1 repeat. He asked Claude how this keeps working. It said: you don’t need big wins. You need a small edge executed thousands of times at near-even conditions. Volume handles the rest. He asked: what kind of capital this started with. Claude: based on sizing — probably under $1,000. Compounding did the rest. He went through the trades manually. Same pattern every time: short window mispriced odds fast execution instant settlement No randomness. No luck. The same edge, repeated 16,279 times until it turned into $165K. He asked Claude one last thing. What do you call this strategy? It said: capturing the gap between panic pricing and actual probability on repeat. At scale, that gap becomes income. Still running. You only need Claude + laptop + 1 hour/day. Giving This Free for 24 hours. To get it: 1. Comment the word 'Trade' 2. Like and Retweet this post 3. Follow me Marry Evan (so i can DM you)

Marry Evan

69,439 次观看 • 4 个月前

It worked... Gave Claude $20. Gave it 4 prompts and left it coding overnight. Woke up to: 1) finished script 2) +$102 from first 6 trades Didn't touch anything. Then I found this wallet: ohanism / 0x890...beb $167,439.86 profit 44,462 predictions $2,369 biggest win Started Feb 2026 What made me stop cold: Not just BTC. BTC. ETH. XRP. SOL. Same 15-minute window logic. Four assets simultaneously. Examples: $373 → $2,636 (+605%) ETH $122 → $1,116 (+809%) SOL $1,583 → $3,953 (+149%) BTC One equation. Four assets. Running while you sleep. Framework I gave Claude: 1. Multi-asset window mapping Find 15-min windows across BTC, ETH, XRP and SOL with >68% directional bias. Score each asset independently. 2. Cross-asset Kelly sizing f* = (p × b − q) / bSize each asset by its own confidence score. Never treat them equally. 3. Correlation filter If BTC and ETH signals fire simultaneously — reduce ETH size by 50%. Correlated losses kill accounts. 4. Bayesian updates Each settled trade recalibrates that asset's window score. Four assets learning in parallel. Claude built everything in 35 minutes. Funded with $20. Fired in 4 minutes. This is the wallet I copied: 0x89b5cdaaa4866c1e738406712012a630b4078beb Copy trade him here: While you read this it placed 3 more trades. Follow. The edge doesn't wait.

It worked... Gave Claude $20. Gave it 4 prompts and left it coding overnight. Woke up to: 1) finished script 2) +$102 from first 6 trades Didn't touch anything. Then I found this wallet: ohanism / 0x890...beb $167,439.86 profit 44,462 predictions $2,369 biggest win Started Feb 2026 What made me stop cold: Not just BTC. BTC. ETH. XRP. SOL. Same 15-minute window logic. Four assets simultaneously. Examples: $373 → $2,636 (+605%) ETH $122 → $1,116 (+809%) SOL $1,583 → $3,953 (+149%) BTC One equation. Four assets. Running while you sleep. Framework I gave Claude: 1. Multi-asset window mapping Find 15-min windows across BTC, ETH, XRP and SOL with >68% directional bias. Score each asset independently. 2. Cross-asset Kelly sizing f* = (p × b − q) / bSize each asset by its own confidence score. Never treat them equally. 3. Correlation filter If BTC and ETH signals fire simultaneously — reduce ETH size by 50%. Correlated losses kill accounts. 4. Bayesian updates Each settled trade recalibrates that asset's window score. Four assets learning in parallel. Claude built everything in 35 minutes. Funded with $20. Fired in 4 minutes. This is the wallet I copied: 0x89b5cdaaa4866c1e738406712012a630b4078beb Copy trade him here: While you read this it placed 3 more trades. Follow. The edge doesn't wait.

Frogify

70,600 次观看 • 4 个月前

This trader gave Claude $44 and one question. Not “what should I build.” Not “how do bots work.” He asked: what’s the easiest way to consistently extract money from short-term mispricing. No lecture. No disclaimer. No theory. It said: find small windows where the market is off by a few percent. Quietly. Repeatedly. At scale. Then it dropped a wallet. stargate5 $165,618 profit 16,279 trades Joined November 2025 He almost skipped it. Then he opened the activity. No predictions. No narratives. Just micro trades on 5–15 minute windows. Over and over and over. Tiny edges. Constant flow. The entire strategy: scan for mispricing above ~6% enter instantly redeem at $1 repeat. He asked Claude how this keeps working. It said: you don’t need big wins. You need a small edge executed thousands of times at near-even conditions. Volume handles the rest. He asked: what kind of capital this started with. Claude: based on sizing — probably under $1,000. Compounding did the rest. He went through the trades manually. Same pattern every time: short window mispriced odds fast execution instant settlement No randomness. No luck. The same edge, repeated 16,279 times until it turned into $165K. He asked Claude one last thing. What do you call this strategy? It said: capturing the gap between panic pricing and actual probability on repeat. At scale, that gap becomes income. Still running. You only need Claude + laptop + 1 hour/day. Giving This Free for 24 hours. To get it: Just: 1. Comment the word ‘CLAUDE’ 2. Like and Retweet this post 3. Follow me Marry Evan (so that I can message you)

This trader gave Claude $44 and one question. Not “what should I build.” Not “how do bots work.” He asked: what’s the easiest way to consistently extract money from short-term mispricing. No lecture. No disclaimer. No theory. It said: find small windows where the market is off by a few percent. Quietly. Repeatedly. At scale. Then it dropped a wallet. stargate5 $165,618 profit 16,279 trades Joined November 2025 He almost skipped it. Then he opened the activity. No predictions. No narratives. Just micro trades on 5–15 minute windows. Over and over and over. Tiny edges. Constant flow. The entire strategy: scan for mispricing above ~6% enter instantly redeem at $1 repeat. He asked Claude how this keeps working. It said: you don’t need big wins. You need a small edge executed thousands of times at near-even conditions. Volume handles the rest. He asked: what kind of capital this started with. Claude: based on sizing — probably under $1,000. Compounding did the rest. He went through the trades manually. Same pattern every time: short window mispriced odds fast execution instant settlement No randomness. No luck. The same edge, repeated 16,279 times until it turned into $165K. He asked Claude one last thing. What do you call this strategy? It said: capturing the gap between panic pricing and actual probability on repeat. At scale, that gap becomes income. Still running. You only need Claude + laptop + 1 hour/day. Giving This Free for 24 hours. To get it: Just: 1. Comment the word ‘CLAUDE’ 2. Like and Retweet this post 3. Follow me Marry Evan (so that I can message you)

Marry Evan

63,149 次观看 • 4 个月前

This trader gave Claude $44 and one question. Not “what should I build.” Not “how do bots work.” He asked: what’s the easiest way to consistently extract money from short-term mispricing. No lecture. No disclaimer. No theory. It said: find small windows where the market is off by a few percent. Quietly. Repeatedly. At scale. Then it dropped a wallet. stargate5 $165,618 profit 16,279 trades Joined November 2025 He almost skipped it. Then he opened the activity. No predictions. No narratives. Just micro trades on 5–15 minute windows. Over and over and over. Tiny edges. Constant flow. The entire strategy: scan for mispricing above ~6% enter instantly redeem at $1 repeat. He asked Claude how this keeps working. It said: you don’t need big wins. You need a small edge executed thousands of times at near-even conditions. Volume handles the rest. He asked: what kind of capital this started with. Claude: based on sizing — probably under $1,000. Compounding did the rest. He went through the trades manually. Same pattern every time: short window mispriced odds fast execution instant settlement No randomness. No luck. The same edge, repeated 16,279 times until it turned into $165K. He asked Claude one last thing. What do you call this strategy? It said: capturing the gap between panic pricing and actual probability on repeat. At scale, that gap becomes income. Still running. You only need Claude + laptop + 1 hour/day. Giving This Free for 24 hours. To get it: Just: 1. Comment the word ‘CLAUDE’ 2. Like and Retweet this post 3. Follow me ZAYVEN KNOX (so that I can message you)

This trader gave Claude $44 and one question. Not “what should I build.” Not “how do bots work.” He asked: what’s the easiest way to consistently extract money from short-term mispricing. No lecture. No disclaimer. No theory. It said: find small windows where the market is off by a few percent. Quietly. Repeatedly. At scale. Then it dropped a wallet. stargate5 $165,618 profit 16,279 trades Joined November 2025 He almost skipped it. Then he opened the activity. No predictions. No narratives. Just micro trades on 5–15 minute windows. Over and over and over. Tiny edges. Constant flow. The entire strategy: scan for mispricing above ~6% enter instantly redeem at $1 repeat. He asked Claude how this keeps working. It said: you don’t need big wins. You need a small edge executed thousands of times at near-even conditions. Volume handles the rest. He asked: what kind of capital this started with. Claude: based on sizing — probably under $1,000. Compounding did the rest. He went through the trades manually. Same pattern every time: short window mispriced odds fast execution instant settlement No randomness. No luck. The same edge, repeated 16,279 times until it turned into $165K. He asked Claude one last thing. What do you call this strategy? It said: capturing the gap between panic pricing and actual probability on repeat. At scale, that gap becomes income. Still running. You only need Claude + laptop + 1 hour/day. Giving This Free for 24 hours. To get it: Just: 1. Comment the word ‘CLAUDE’ 2. Like and Retweet this post 3. Follow me ZAYVEN KNOX (so that I can message you)

ZAYVEN KNOX

10,754 次观看 • 4 个月前

An Anthropic engineer paid for my espresso at Sightglass when he saw my screen I was running my Polymarket bot from the counter. He was next in line. Looked over my shoulder. Stopped scrolling. "That's not a normal trading app. What's it actually running on" I told him. Claude Code. Four repos. $25 a month. He sat down without asking. "I'm on the agent team. We stress test Claude for exactly this. You're letting it find its own edges" Not just edges. Wallets. 86 million trades. Every wallet. Every entry. Every exit. "You're feeding Claude raw wallet data and letting it identify who consistently wins. Then cloning them" He said it slowly. Like he was writing the threat model in his head. One prompt. Find every wallet with 100 plus trades and win rate above 70%. Rank by profit. Export top 50. Claude scanned 14,000 wallets in 4 minutes. Returned 47. The top 20 made more than the bottom 13,000 combined. "That's not a stat. That's a hit list" Exactly. "And you didn't write the scoring function" Claude did. I just wired it into an if-statement. Then I showed him the second repo. Official Rust CLI. No API key for reads. 500 markets, Claude scores them in minutes. Gap. Depth. Resolution window. 487 markets become 35 before a dollar moves. 93% killed before I even see them. A green fill landed on the screen. +$84. Copytrade wallet: He watched it hit. "How does it decide to actually enter" Three agents. Shared wallet. No shared memory. Arbitrage, convergence, whale copy. 2 agree, full size. 1 alone, half. Disagree, no trade. Consensus filter alone killed 40% of losing trades. "And the exits?" The 47 whales never hold to settlement. 91% exit early. 73% of max profit captured. Redeploy immediately. My bot cuts at 85% of expected move or on a 3x volume spike. "You built a whale copy bot that exits before the whales" Yeah. He put his espresso down. "How often does it trade" 10 a day on average. Most of them skipped before I look up from my coffee. My setup: Claude API - $20/mo VPS in Germany - $5/mo poly_data - free polymarket-cli - free Polymarket/agents - free $200 seed. 27 days ago. $14,300 now. Copytrade here: 271 trades. 74% win rate. Sharpe 2.47. I haven't touched it in 27 days. He stared at the screen for a long time. "This is literally what our red team simulates. Except you actually shipped it" He emailed me the next morning. "Any chance you'd take a call with our policy lead" I told him the article is the call. Read it twice. Too late to gatekeep.

An Anthropic engineer paid for my espresso at Sightglass when he saw my screen I was running my Polymarket bot from the counter. He was next in line. Looked over my shoulder. Stopped scrolling. "That's not a normal trading app. What's it actually running on" I told him. Claude Code. Four repos. $25 a month. He sat down without asking. "I'm on the agent team. We stress test Claude for exactly this. You're letting it find its own edges" Not just edges. Wallets. 86 million trades. Every wallet. Every entry. Every exit. "You're feeding Claude raw wallet data and letting it identify who consistently wins. Then cloning them" He said it slowly. Like he was writing the threat model in his head. One prompt. Find every wallet with 100 plus trades and win rate above 70%. Rank by profit. Export top 50. Claude scanned 14,000 wallets in 4 minutes. Returned 47. The top 20 made more than the bottom 13,000 combined. "That's not a stat. That's a hit list" Exactly. "And you didn't write the scoring function" Claude did. I just wired it into an if-statement. Then I showed him the second repo. Official Rust CLI. No API key for reads. 500 markets, Claude scores them in minutes. Gap. Depth. Resolution window. 487 markets become 35 before a dollar moves. 93% killed before I even see them. A green fill landed on the screen. +$84. Copytrade wallet: He watched it hit. "How does it decide to actually enter" Three agents. Shared wallet. No shared memory. Arbitrage, convergence, whale copy. 2 agree, full size. 1 alone, half. Disagree, no trade. Consensus filter alone killed 40% of losing trades. "And the exits?" The 47 whales never hold to settlement. 91% exit early. 73% of max profit captured. Redeploy immediately. My bot cuts at 85% of expected move or on a 3x volume spike. "You built a whale copy bot that exits before the whales" Yeah. He put his espresso down. "How often does it trade" 10 a day on average. Most of them skipped before I look up from my coffee. My setup: Claude API - $20/mo VPS in Germany - $5/mo poly_data - free polymarket-cli - free Polymarket/agents - free $200 seed. 27 days ago. $14,300 now. Copytrade here: 271 trades. 74% win rate. Sharpe 2.47. I haven't touched it in 27 days. He stared at the screen for a long time. "This is literally what our red team simulates. Except you actually shipped it" He emailed me the next morning. "Any chance you'd take a call with our policy lead" I told him the article is the call. Read it twice. Too late to gatekeep.

Lunar

990,693 次观看 • 3 个月前