Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

This runner at first was caught in a pick off move by the pitcher. Pitcher throws to first and the first baseman fires to second and the umpire calls him out. He looked safe on the play. However, the umpire admits he was safe but said he called him... out because the other team was losing 10-0 in the first inning. He said “he was so safe but I just gave it to them.” Basically saying we gotta’ get the game moving right? Fellow umpires, some coaches and parents said they respect the call and why. But many people said you are cheating that one runner by calling him out. They said no matter the score you have to have integrity even if it is 20-0. They said this is why kids grow up disliking umpires and why parents act the way they do. Tough one- I actually understand where he is coming from but if that were your kid, would you want him called out? I say call the game the right way 100% and let it play out the way it is supposed to. How is the other team supposed to get better if you are giving them calls? Do you agree with the umpire and why he did it? Or, are you totally against that and that should never happen?show more

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

301,649 subscribers

44,446 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика Спорт

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

This umpire initially called the runner coming home out. The catcher drops the ball and then the umpire rules him safe because of the dropped ball. Then the catcher after a couple of seconds goes and tags the runner and the umpire calls him out. I don’t know what game the umpire is watching but it clearly isn’t this one. And I don’t know where he received his training. After the catcher dropped the ball, if he thought the runner didn’t touch home he should have made no call. But clearly he does. What do you think? Was he safe or out?

This umpire initially called the runner coming home out. The catcher drops the ball and then the umpire rules him safe because of the dropped ball. Then the catcher after a couple of seconds goes and tags the runner and the umpire calls him out. I don’t know what game the umpire is watching but it clearly isn’t this one. And I don’t know where he received his training. After the catcher dropped the ball, if he thought the runner didn’t touch home he should have made no call. But clearly he does. What do you think? Was he safe or out?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

66,729 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

This batter bunts the ball down the first base line. As he is sprinting down the line the first basemen is getting ready to make a play and tag him. The runner dives a bit outside with his had stretched out and tags the side of the double first base for runners. He’s safe. But the umpire said he was outside the base path and called him out. Th What do you think? Was he out of the baseline or not? Safe or out?

This batter bunts the ball down the first base line. As he is sprinting down the line the first basemen is getting ready to make a play and tag him. The runner dives a bit outside with his had stretched out and tags the side of the double first base for runners. He’s safe. But the umpire said he was outside the base path and called him out. Th What do you think? Was he out of the baseline or not? Safe or out?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

282,808 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

This batter hits a hard shallow liner into right field. The right fielder is charging and fires to first. The ball is overthrown and the runner looks but decides to stay at first. The catcher backed up the overthrown ball and throws to first and he rages the runner. The umpire calls him out and says he made an attempt to go to second base. I think he looked but I don’t see an attempt. He stayed in fouls territory the whole time. Just because his head looked doesn’t mean he made an attempt. 50/50 people saying he’s out for an attempt and others say no attempt, he should be safe. What’s your call? Safe or out? An attempt to second or no attempt?

This batter hits a hard shallow liner into right field. The right fielder is charging and fires to first. The ball is overthrown and the runner looks but decides to stay at first. The catcher backed up the overthrown ball and throws to first and he rages the runner. The umpire calls him out and says he made an attempt to go to second base. I think he looked but I don’t see an attempt. He stayed in fouls territory the whole time. Just because his head looked doesn’t mean he made an attempt. 50/50 people saying he’s out for an attempt and others say no attempt, he should be safe. What’s your call? Safe or out? An attempt to second or no attempt?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

325,087 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

This is the reason that coaches and parents go bonkers sometimes. This play at home left people baffled. The runner is rounding third and headed for home. The throw to the catcher gets there way ahead of time of the runner. The catcher catches the ball, waits for the runner and applies the tag. Easy out right? 💯 The umpire calls obstruction on the catcher and said he was obstructing the runner from scoring. The runner is safe! 🤯 That may be one of the worst calls I’ve ever seen on any level. The ball arrived so early that the catcher could have sat on home plate and had lunch waiting for that runner. If you have the ball you can be right there waiting to tag the runner when he comes in. What do you think? Obstruction or not? Was the catcher not giving the runner a fair path to home plate or was the umpire watching a game on another planet?

This is the reason that coaches and parents go bonkers sometimes. This play at home left people baffled. The runner is rounding third and headed for home. The throw to the catcher gets there way ahead of time of the runner. The catcher catches the ball, waits for the runner and applies the tag. Easy out right? 💯 The umpire calls obstruction on the catcher and said he was obstructing the runner from scoring. The runner is safe! 🤯 That may be one of the worst calls I’ve ever seen on any level. The ball arrived so early that the catcher could have sat on home plate and had lunch waiting for that runner. If you have the ball you can be right there waiting to tag the runner when he comes in. What do you think? Obstruction or not? Was the catcher not giving the runner a fair path to home plate or was the umpire watching a game on another planet?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

621,966 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

This very angry dude bought a car from this dealership that morning. When he got home, he realized there was a lot of mechanical problems with it and that they basically sold him a lemon. He called the dealership asking them to refund his money because they knowingly sold him a bad car. They said no it was advertised as is and needed work . He said OK I’m coming to your shop and I’m going to drive it right through the glass window ….and that’s exactly what he did . He was arrested. The damages were approximated at about $85,000 to the building. The court case is still pending.. Some would say, they understand his frustration however, according to the dealership, they did tell him that it needed repairs and it was sold as is. So although I understand his frustration, I can’t condone what he did.

This very angry dude bought a car from this dealership that morning. When he got home, he realized there was a lot of mechanical problems with it and that they basically sold him a lemon. He called the dealership asking them to refund his money because they knowingly sold him a bad car. They said no it was advertised as is and needed work . He said OK I’m coming to your shop and I’m going to drive it right through the glass window ….and that’s exactly what he did . He was arrested. The damages were approximated at about $85,000 to the building. The court case is still pending.. Some would say, they understand his frustration however, according to the dealership, they did tell him that it needed repairs and it was sold as is. So although I understand his frustration, I can’t condone what he did.

Leah Rain ✝️🇺🇸🎸🏝️

50,456 просмотров • 16 дней назад

This umpire was behind the plate calling a game. He overheard the moms in the stands saying this young man up to bat was having a bad day, had injured his knee and was hurting pretty bad and needed a hug. So, he asked him if he needed a hug, he said yes, so he called time out and the Blue obliged and gave him a hug. A simple act of kindness. If we could do more of these things what a better place this world would be. 💯 Our youth need more leadership like this. Have you ever seen an umpire call time out and go give the batter a hug? Don’t you think coaches, parents and other umpires alike could learn a thing or two by watching this guy?

This umpire was behind the plate calling a game. He overheard the moms in the stands saying this young man up to bat was having a bad day, had injured his knee and was hurting pretty bad and needed a hug. So, he asked him if he needed a hug, he said yes, so he called time out and the Blue obliged and gave him a hug. A simple act of kindness. If we could do more of these things what a better place this world would be. 💯 Our youth need more leadership like this. Have you ever seen an umpire call time out and go give the batter a hug? Don’t you think coaches, parents and other umpires alike could learn a thing or two by watching this guy?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

318,866 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

On the Trump and Biden debate, Trump said this: Trump: “I really don't know what he said at the end of that sentence.” He went on to say he doesn’t think Biden did either. Did you notice what was missing? The media KNEW Biden was in Decline so they Didn’t go back and ask Biden to Clarify what he said. They always do that if anything is in Question! If they had done that Biden would have Panicked and freaked out and the response would have nailed it shut! It would have clearly exposed Biden. They Knew that’s why they didn’t ask for Clarification!

On the Trump and Biden debate, Trump said this: Trump: “I really don't know what he said at the end of that sentence.” He went on to say he doesn’t think Biden did either. Did you notice what was missing? The media KNEW Biden was in Decline so they Didn’t go back and ask Biden to Clarify what he said. They always do that if anything is in Question! If they had done that Biden would have Panicked and freaked out and the response would have nailed it shut! It would have clearly exposed Biden. They Knew that’s why they didn’t ask for Clarification!

Johnny Midnight ⚡️

662,787 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

This guy is losing his mind in traffic. He’s honking and screaming at the car in front of him to turn right. But the car in front of him not only has a red light, but where is it supposed to turn? Traffic is backed up and there is a truck right there. Many people said, “oh look, shocker, guy is in a Dodge Ram.”😂 Some said they would put their car in park and refuse to go. 💯 But, some did say there was one car length available and the car should have turned. 🤯 Yeah- people like this shouldn’t be driving. They need therapy. The car didn’t have the right of way. Where did he want the car to go? Should this guy be driving? Wouldn’t you think his rage would increase the risk of accidents? How would you deal with him if he was behind you?

This guy is losing his mind in traffic. He’s honking and screaming at the car in front of him to turn right. But the car in front of him not only has a red light, but where is it supposed to turn? Traffic is backed up and there is a truck right there. Many people said, “oh look, shocker, guy is in a Dodge Ram.”😂 Some said they would put their car in park and refuse to go. 💯 But, some did say there was one car length available and the car should have turned. 🤯 Yeah- people like this shouldn’t be driving. They need therapy. The car didn’t have the right of way. Where did he want the car to go? Should this guy be driving? Wouldn’t you think his rage would increase the risk of accidents? How would you deal with him if he was behind you?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

14,379 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Tapper: But you would agree that don't take tylenol is not the correct suggestion. It is: if you are a pregnant woman and you want to take tylenol, talk to your doctor. Oz: That was that was the first thing the president said… Tapper: But then he said, don't take tylenol 11 times after that.

Tapper: But you would agree that don't take tylenol is not the correct suggestion. It is: if you are a pregnant woman and you want to take tylenol, talk to your doctor. Oz: That was that was the first thing the president said… Tapper: But then he said, don't take tylenol 11 times after that.

Acyn

1,067,043 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

A witness's memoir. The first days of a full-scale war. Massacre on the Zhytomyr highway, Kyiv region. Every Ukrainian killed by Russian soldiers is not a number. It is a person, people. Read this memoir. We were driving in the opposite lane. Almost as soon as we entered the stretch [of the Zhytomyr highway towards Kyiv - ed.] we heard shots. We stopped, the car was not moving. Maksym jumped out and started waving: "There are children here! Children!" It was all in front of me. He fell down. Ksenia started to rattle. Once, twice. Hordii said: "Why is mom rattling?" I turned around and took Hordii. I put him [in the driver's seat] and covered him [with myself]. I got a bullet (points to his right forearm - ed.). They were shooting for a long time. And then there was silence. I opened the door and there were Buryats with machine guns... I realized that they were Russians. I said immediately: "There are children here, don't shoot, please, there are children here." And they: "The child first". Hordii went out, but I couldn't go out... I got out and saw Maksym's legs. I wanted to approach him, but [the Russian] did not let me pass. He said: "That's it! That's it!" I started saying, "Ksenia is here! Mom is behind!" He looked: "Cover the child's eyes". I covered Hordii's eyes, I had a shawl. And he took us in that direction (to the area behind the gas station - ed.). There was a pit there. I asked him [the Russian who brought us]: "Are you serious now? Don't do that." And he said: "I'm sorry. My child is also six years old. I'm sorry." I thought they were going to shoot us. But a Russian officer appeared behind the pit and shouted: "Who opened fire? Who shot? Who brought her here?" I started to tell him: "We were on our way, we evacuated, they are shooting... we have children...", "You had no identification marks". I said: "We had white ones... and [the inscription] 'children' both in front and behind". Someone behind me said: "What are you going to do with them?" He looked me in the eye for so long, and then said: "Let them go." They took us out through the gas station and we left with Hordii. Another Buryat took Hordii in his arms and asked, "What's your name?" "'Hordii'. "I'm sorry, I know you won't forgive me, but I'm sorry." I think he was the one who shot and killed my parents. Mass murder on the Zhytomyr highway: map, chronology and investigation of the Russian crime:

A witness's memoir. The first days of a full-scale war. Massacre on the Zhytomyr highway, Kyiv region. Every Ukrainian killed by Russian soldiers is not a number. It is a person, people. Read this memoir. We were driving in the opposite lane. Almost as soon as we entered the stretch [of the Zhytomyr highway towards Kyiv - ed.] we heard shots. We stopped, the car was not moving. Maksym jumped out and started waving: "There are children here! Children!" It was all in front of me. He fell down. Ksenia started to rattle. Once, twice. Hordii said: "Why is mom rattling?" I turned around and took Hordii. I put him [in the driver's seat] and covered him [with myself]. I got a bullet (points to his right forearm - ed.). They were shooting for a long time. And then there was silence. I opened the door and there were Buryats with machine guns... I realized that they were Russians. I said immediately: "There are children here, don't shoot, please, there are children here." And they: "The child first". Hordii went out, but I couldn't go out... I got out and saw Maksym's legs. I wanted to approach him, but [the Russian] did not let me pass. He said: "That's it! That's it!" I started saying, "Ksenia is here! Mom is behind!" He looked: "Cover the child's eyes". I covered Hordii's eyes, I had a shawl. And he took us in that direction (to the area behind the gas station - ed.). There was a pit there. I asked him [the Russian who brought us]: "Are you serious now? Don't do that." And he said: "I'm sorry. My child is also six years old. I'm sorry." I thought they were going to shoot us. But a Russian officer appeared behind the pit and shouted: "Who opened fire? Who shot? Who brought her here?" I started to tell him: "We were on our way, we evacuated, they are shooting... we have children...", "You had no identification marks". I said: "We had white ones... and [the inscription] 'children' both in front and behind". Someone behind me said: "What are you going to do with them?" He looked me in the eye for so long, and then said: "Let them go." They took us out through the gas station and we left with Hordii. Another Buryat took Hordii in his arms and asked, "What's your name?" "'Hordii'. "I'm sorry, I know you won't forgive me, but I'm sorry." I think he was the one who shot and killed my parents. Mass murder on the Zhytomyr highway: map, chronology and investigation of the Russian crime:

Anton Gerashchenko

809,212 просмотров • 2 лет назад

I was eating lunch with some male coworkers when one of them noticed I had a heating pad on my stomach and asked, “Are you on your period?” I said, “Yeah.” He laughed and said, “Women are so dramatic about a little blood.” I asked, “Would you say that if you were the one bleeding every month?” He said, “Obviously not, because men don’t have to deal with that.” I looked at him and said, “Exactly. So maybe the people who experience it should be the ones deciding whether it’s painful.” He went quiet. Funny how something becomes “dramatic” the second you aren’t the one experiencing it.

I was eating lunch with some male coworkers when one of them noticed I had a heating pad on my stomach and asked, “Are you on your period?” I said, “Yeah.” He laughed and said, “Women are so dramatic about a little blood.” I asked, “Would you say that if you were the one bleeding every month?” He said, “Obviously not, because men don’t have to deal with that.” I looked at him and said, “Exactly. So maybe the people who experience it should be the ones deciding whether it’s painful.” He went quiet. Funny how something becomes “dramatic” the second you aren’t the one experiencing it.

Bella

43,150 просмотров • 2 дней назад

This is actually concerning. Apparently, someone said that it was sh that they called early morning and asked for jw 😭 These sasaengs obtained the number privately. Said they called around 2 AM. These sasaengs also said that they called the "staff" but some fans are claiming that it sh's voice. These xmm 😭 if it is really sh you mfs dont respect him, he was tired and still recovering you mfs and this whole thing is so wrong, so fvcking wrong.

This is actually concerning. Apparently, someone said that it was sh that they called early morning and asked for jw 😭 These sasaengs obtained the number privately. Said they called around 2 AM. These sasaengs also said that they called the "staff" but some fans are claiming that it sh's voice. These xmm 😭 if it is really sh you mfs dont respect him, he was tired and still recovering you mfs and this whole thing is so wrong, so fvcking wrong.

mandu

1,360,959 просмотров • 2 лет назад

This batter hit a tapper back to the pitcher. The pitcher fields the ball and runs to tag the runner from third trying to score at home. Umpire’s call is out! But on closer inspection, the pitcher takes the ball out of her glove and holds it in her hand but tags the runner with the glove. I say the runner should have been safe. You make the call.

This batter hit a tapper back to the pitcher. The pitcher fields the ball and runs to tag the runner from third trying to score at home. Umpire’s call is out! But on closer inspection, the pitcher takes the ball out of her glove and holds it in her hand but tags the runner with the glove. I say the runner should have been safe. You make the call.

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

36,433 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Deion Sanders revealed what he told TCU RB Trey Sanders during the injury timeout👀 "I walked over to him because he was a kid that wanted to come here. The reason I didn't take him was because he sustained some significant injuries... But I still had love for the kid because he wanted to play for us. So, I went out there and I said, 'Son, now you know if you don't get up, they ain't got a chance. So I want you to get your butt up and get back in this game and be dominant like you've been.' That's what I told him. I wanted the kid to be dominant. His last name's Sanders, first of all, and he was the No. 2 on offense. That's what the conversation was."

Deion Sanders revealed what he told TCU RB Trey Sanders during the injury timeout👀 "I walked over to him because he was a kid that wanted to come here. The reason I didn't take him was because he sustained some significant injuries... But I still had love for the kid because he wanted to play for us. So, I went out there and I said, 'Son, now you know if you don't get up, they ain't got a chance. So I want you to get your butt up and get back in this game and be dominant like you've been.' That's what I told him. I wanted the kid to be dominant. His last name's Sanders, first of all, and he was the No. 2 on offense. That's what the conversation was."

On3

11,680,405 просмотров • 2 лет назад

I don’t know what it is with Carlos quotes and people not putting everything he said complete but this is what he said, also mind you this is what got Kimi angry, but Carlos DID moved out of the way “I think he felt I blocked him, but I don't think I did. I guess these days, in straight-line mode, if you don't move out of the way exactly as the other driver wants, you can't turn because you don't have downforce with the wings open, and maybe he thought I could have moved out of the way better.” “But I also don’t think he should call me an idiot over the radio; I think it’s against the rules to swear or insult another driver, so I think he should calm down a bit.”

I don’t know what it is with Carlos quotes and people not putting everything he said complete but this is what he said, also mind you this is what got Kimi angry, but Carlos DID moved out of the way “I think he felt I blocked him, but I don't think I did. I guess these days, in straight-line mode, if you don't move out of the way exactly as the other driver wants, you can't turn because you don't have downforce with the wings open, and maybe he thought I could have moved out of the way better.” “But I also don’t think he should call me an idiot over the radio; I think it’s against the rules to swear or insult another driver, so I think he should calm down a bit.”

ari

305,152 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Dawah is deception. Why are you leaving out the context SeerahPro ? You know right after this he says he doesn’t remember well what he wrote in that entry on Muhaymin. Why leave that part out? He even goes on to say that section seems to be non-committal and he needs to go back and re-read it. So since you don’t want to show every one the full context, I’ll do it, and expose how you are lying now and lied in the debate. Sinai doesn’t help your claim that the Quran believes the previous scriptures were textually corrupted. He says he doesn’t think the Quran believes the previous scriptures were corrupted in the deep past and that they are unrecoverable (Clip 1). Now let’s look at the short clip you pulled in context (Clip 2). First, what he says does not affirm why you cited him to begin with, which is that the Quran is supposed to be a supreme authority and determine which parts of our scriptures are corrupt and which are not. In the very clip you pulled he says, “The Quran is claiming to be able to sort of determine the correct reading of these previous scriptures and to remedy misreading and misunderstandings.” So by arbiter he means it is not determining what parts of our scriptures are true or corrupted, it is only an arbiter in determining meaning. You just buried yourself by citing this, because you implied Sinai was saying the Quran is an arbiter for determining textual corruption, which he doesn’t say. It’s like you didn’t even pay attention to what you pulled. That is embarrassing. Second, right after this (in what you left out) the interviewer reminds him he entertained two possibilities in his book and was noncommittal. Sinai says he doesn’t remember what he said and was probably leaving open possibilities, which is what I already had to correct you on. If you go back to the book, once again, he said on page 707 essentially what I said, “Muhaymin, meanwhile, is derived from Syriac mhaymnā (or conceivably from its equivalent in some other form of Aramaic), a passive participle of the verb haymen and meaning ‘trustworthy, faithful, loyal.’” After this all he does in the book is mention other possibilities and the one you want is more contingent on non-canonical readings. But even if that interpretation is correct (which Sinai confirms in this interview is his view) it doesn’t help you, because you misunderstood what Sinai means by ‘arbiter.’ In Clip 3 he first says, “So I need to reread that entry. I guess it seems to be very non-committal.” But remember you said (Clip 4), “In his 'Key Terms of the Quran' he explicitly says that Muhaymin means the Quran is the arbiter of the contents.” That is incorrect. He did not explicitly say that. Why did you lie? In Clip 3 he goes on to say “But I think entrusted with authority can mean, authorized to sort of authoritatively interpret and determine especially theological significance.” So you don’t even understand what Sinai means by “arbiter.” He doesn’t mean what you mean, that the Quran is determining which parts of our scriptures are true and corrupted, but that it is an arbiter of meaning. The fact that you still do not see this means you are beyond delusional. You never should have cited Sinai because he doesn’t help you at all. The funny thing is we were already planning to go live tomorrow to review this interview because he doesn’t help you at all and unintentionally helps with the Islamic Dilemma.

Dawah is deception. Why are you leaving out the context SeerahPro ? You know right after this he says he doesn’t remember well what he wrote in that entry on Muhaymin. Why leave that part out? He even goes on to say that section seems to be non-committal and he needs to go back and re-read it. So since you don’t want to show every one the full context, I’ll do it, and expose how you are lying now and lied in the debate. Sinai doesn’t help your claim that the Quran believes the previous scriptures were textually corrupted. He says he doesn’t think the Quran believes the previous scriptures were corrupted in the deep past and that they are unrecoverable (Clip 1). Now let’s look at the short clip you pulled in context (Clip 2). First, what he says does not affirm why you cited him to begin with, which is that the Quran is supposed to be a supreme authority and determine which parts of our scriptures are corrupt and which are not. In the very clip you pulled he says, “The Quran is claiming to be able to sort of determine the correct reading of these previous scriptures and to remedy misreading and misunderstandings.” So by arbiter he means it is not determining what parts of our scriptures are true or corrupted, it is only an arbiter in determining meaning. You just buried yourself by citing this, because you implied Sinai was saying the Quran is an arbiter for determining textual corruption, which he doesn’t say. It’s like you didn’t even pay attention to what you pulled. That is embarrassing. Second, right after this (in what you left out) the interviewer reminds him he entertained two possibilities in his book and was noncommittal. Sinai says he doesn’t remember what he said and was probably leaving open possibilities, which is what I already had to correct you on. If you go back to the book, once again, he said on page 707 essentially what I said, “Muhaymin, meanwhile, is derived from Syriac mhaymnā (or conceivably from its equivalent in some other form of Aramaic), a passive participle of the verb haymen and meaning ‘trustworthy, faithful, loyal.’” After this all he does in the book is mention other possibilities and the one you want is more contingent on non-canonical readings. But even if that interpretation is correct (which Sinai confirms in this interview is his view) it doesn’t help you, because you misunderstood what Sinai means by ‘arbiter.’ In Clip 3 he first says, “So I need to reread that entry. I guess it seems to be very non-committal.” But remember you said (Clip 4), “In his 'Key Terms of the Quran' he explicitly says that Muhaymin means the Quran is the arbiter of the contents.” That is incorrect. He did not explicitly say that. Why did you lie? In Clip 3 he goes on to say “But I think entrusted with authority can mean, authorized to sort of authoritatively interpret and determine especially theological significance.” So you don’t even understand what Sinai means by “arbiter.” He doesn’t mean what you mean, that the Quran is determining which parts of our scriptures are true and corrupted, but that it is an arbiter of meaning. The fact that you still do not see this means you are beyond delusional. You never should have cited Sinai because he doesn’t help you at all. The funny thing is we were already planning to go live tomorrow to review this interview because he doesn’t help you at all and unintentionally helps with the Islamic Dilemma.

InspiringPhilosophy - Michael Jones

36,857 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🚨 Ajinkya Rahane revealed the story behind his decision to send Yashasvi Jaiswal off the field. 🗣️ " I sensed the situation and also I felt it was going out of hand, both the players were going out of hand and it was my responsibility to control my teammates. You respect the umpires, the officials who are on field, who are controlling the game, who are officiating the game and also the situations. Mistakes can happen to anyone, but you, as a player, you be in that limit. So, I sensed the situation, what can happen next, it was my instant reaction to send him off the field. As a player, I also felt that he must have felt bad, I said, okay, if he felt bad about me, it's okay. But I think, that point in time, it was a good thing for him. The thing which I told him about, go in from the back, put ice on your head and come back "

🚨 Ajinkya Rahane revealed the story behind his decision to send Yashasvi Jaiswal off the field. 🗣️ " I sensed the situation and also I felt it was going out of hand, both the players were going out of hand and it was my responsibility to control my teammates. You respect the umpires, the officials who are on field, who are controlling the game, who are officiating the game and also the situations. Mistakes can happen to anyone, but you, as a player, you be in that limit. So, I sensed the situation, what can happen next, it was my instant reaction to send him off the field. As a player, I also felt that he must have felt bad, I said, okay, if he felt bad about me, it's okay. But I think, that point in time, it was a good thing for him. The thing which I told him about, go in from the back, put ice on your head and come back "

OldMonkofCricket

21,540 просмотров • 11 дней назад

On this day, my son was having a bad game and throwing tantrums during their first game that they lost. Myself and his coach spoke to him just before the 2nd game reminding him how good he is. The coach said to him “can I get Hattrick from you in this game” Guess what? He did!!!

On this day, my son was having a bad game and throwing tantrums during their first game that they lost. Myself and his coach spoke to him just before the 2nd game reminding him how good he is. The coach said to him “can I get Hattrick from you in this game” Guess what? He did!!!

SK the Plug 🔌 🇬🇧🇬🇧

15,875 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Regarding the Eric Trump / Daniel Cormier “text scandal”, I am open to being convinced otherwise, but I do not believe for one second that Eric Trump would text something so stupid to Daniel Cormier. It’s laughably stupid on its face to think that Eric Trump would ask a UFC commentator if any of the fights are “rigged”. That he would ask it in writing. And that he would not, for example, just pick up the phone and call Dana White or Joe Rogan himself. That said, I just want to understand what happened. Daniel Cormier said he was hacked. Is that to say he was hacked at the text level, or the X post level? Did he in fact make the post, and delete it? If he made the post, did he do it as a joke to illustrate how absurd the text hack was, but realized how the post could be misinterpreted as real? Or did someone make the post from his X account he subsequently deleted it. I know there are some who are going to say he made the post in earnest, thinking the text messages were real, intending to call out the “corruption”, and he has since been threatened, deleted the post, and claimed “hack”, etc. I can tell you exactly why I do not believe, even if he made the post, he did it believing the text message was real, intending to call out the “corruption”. If Cormier seriously thought the text messages were real, he would understand that by posting it publicly, it would literally destroy the UFC, his livelihood and his legacy - in addition to the legacy of everyone who has ever competed in the UFC. There is no realm of the universe in which even if it were in fact a real text that he actually received from Eric Trump, he would post it publicly. Because it would mean the end of the UFC. I just want to know if he actually made the post from his X account, or if the entire post was the result of a hack (hence the subsequent deleting of the post). Serious and sincere questions for clarity that would benefit everyone Eric Trump

Regarding the Eric Trump / Daniel Cormier “text scandal”, I am open to being convinced otherwise, but I do not believe for one second that Eric Trump would text something so stupid to Daniel Cormier. It’s laughably stupid on its face to think that Eric Trump would ask a UFC commentator if any of the fights are “rigged”. That he would ask it in writing. And that he would not, for example, just pick up the phone and call Dana White or Joe Rogan himself. That said, I just want to understand what happened. Daniel Cormier said he was hacked. Is that to say he was hacked at the text level, or the X post level? Did he in fact make the post, and delete it? If he made the post, did he do it as a joke to illustrate how absurd the text hack was, but realized how the post could be misinterpreted as real? Or did someone make the post from his X account he subsequently deleted it. I know there are some who are going to say he made the post in earnest, thinking the text messages were real, intending to call out the “corruption”, and he has since been threatened, deleted the post, and claimed “hack”, etc. I can tell you exactly why I do not believe, even if he made the post, he did it believing the text message was real, intending to call out the “corruption”. If Cormier seriously thought the text messages were real, he would understand that by posting it publicly, it would literally destroy the UFC, his livelihood and his legacy - in addition to the legacy of everyone who has ever competed in the UFC. There is no realm of the universe in which even if it were in fact a real text that he actually received from Eric Trump, he would post it publicly. Because it would mean the end of the UFC. I just want to know if he actually made the post from his X account, or if the entire post was the result of a hack (hence the subsequent deleting of the post). Serious and sincere questions for clarity that would benefit everyone Eric Trump

Viva Frei

30,167 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨AAKASH CHOPRA BLASTS UMPIRE STEVE BUCKNOR🤯 Aakash Chopra said :🗣️ "The man actually took pleasure in telling me that he gave me out. It was the second Test match in Lahore, 2004. I got an inside edge off Shoaib's ball. My place was hanging in the balance because Saurav was coming back, he had already said Yuvraj Singh is going to open, but my second inning was not done yet, so I could still score runs & save my place. I got an inside edge, and the ball hit the pad. He gave it out. I was distraught. There was no DRS back then. It was a very important knock as I was 100 percent going to get dropped in Rawalpindi if I didn't score. He further added : Then, Steve Bucknor met me at the reception of the hotel. He was standing next to me & telling the receptionist, I gave him out. Why are you so proud of that? There was an inside edge. Now what is this? He was crazy. He was always against India. There was a Test match in Sydney where we actually said, Let's send a pillow to his room because he was sleeping. We should have won that Test match. He didn't give out when Justin Langer was hit on the pad in front of the middle. Just take the pillow if you want to sleep.

🚨AAKASH CHOPRA BLASTS UMPIRE STEVE BUCKNOR🤯 Aakash Chopra said :🗣️ "The man actually took pleasure in telling me that he gave me out. It was the second Test match in Lahore, 2004. I got an inside edge off Shoaib's ball. My place was hanging in the balance because Saurav was coming back, he had already said Yuvraj Singh is going to open, but my second inning was not done yet, so I could still score runs & save my place. I got an inside edge, and the ball hit the pad. He gave it out. I was distraught. There was no DRS back then. It was a very important knock as I was 100 percent going to get dropped in Rawalpindi if I didn't score. He further added : Then, Steve Bucknor met me at the reception of the hotel. He was standing next to me & telling the receptionist, I gave him out. Why are you so proud of that? There was an inside edge. Now what is this? He was crazy. He was always against India. There was a Test match in Sydney where we actually said, Let's send a pillow to his room because he was sleeping. We should have won that Test match. He didn't give out when Justin Langer was hit on the pad in front of the middle. Just take the pillow if you want to sleep.

Akshat

67,801 просмотров • 20 дней назад