Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

This seems like a conversation between two comedians, but really it’s a deep reflection of the fundamental difference between the Aryan and the Jew. Norm Macdonald- “Life is what is not what we think it is.” As in reality is what matters not perception. Jerry Seinfeld- “I would say... it’s the exact opposite.” As in perception is what matters not reality. The Aryan has long believed that life/ nature has come with a certain set of rules and we are to learn from those rules. That is the foundation of western thought. We observe the world as it is. The Jew believes that he can create his own reality. Create the world the way he wishes to see it, as he does with social science professors and Hollywood. This is why the Aryan pushes for what he sees as “normal.” 2 parent relationships, strong male Leadership, etc. while the Jew pushes for transgenderism, homosexuality, multiculturalism.show more

Uncommon Sense

320,261 subscribers

213,811 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Comedy News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

You all might not like it or agree with it, but what we are witnessing is Trump negotiating on the world stage. It reminds me of when Trump threatened Kim Jong Un with “fire and fury the likes of which the world has never seen”. The next year Trump and KJU held a peace summit after the MSM said he would start nuclear war and WW3. Trump turned the entire situation around and accomplished something the world once believed to be impossible. I’m not saying the current situation is exactly like North Korea, but it’s just a reminder that these situations are NEVER initially as they seem. It may have appeared liked we were on the brink of destruction, but really we were not. Trump’s objective is not war, but as Commander in Chief of the most powerful military ever assembled, he is going to flex his muscle when he needs to, in order to achieve his desired result. You might not like it, but this is the reality of the situation. It’s not all sunshine and rainbows in the real world.

You all might not like it or agree with it, but what we are witnessing is Trump negotiating on the world stage. It reminds me of when Trump threatened Kim Jong Un with “fire and fury the likes of which the world has never seen”. The next year Trump and KJU held a peace summit after the MSM said he would start nuclear war and WW3. Trump turned the entire situation around and accomplished something the world once believed to be impossible. I’m not saying the current situation is exactly like North Korea, but it’s just a reminder that these situations are NEVER initially as they seem. It may have appeared liked we were on the brink of destruction, but really we were not. Trump’s objective is not war, but as Commander in Chief of the most powerful military ever assembled, he is going to flex his muscle when he needs to, in order to achieve his desired result. You might not like it, but this is the reality of the situation. It’s not all sunshine and rainbows in the real world.

Clandestine

1,075,968 views • 1 year ago

the camera being in a tight close up on both ilya and shane for the entirety of this scene, except for the moment when ilya is working up the courage to say he’s in love. it’s like for the whole conversation it’s just the two of them, there’s nobody else who matters, and then for a brief moment the shot widens as ilya considers the implications of the fact he’s in love with shane. the fact that the rest of the world DOES matter and will always be a presence in their relationship. we’ve been held in this moment between the two of them and by widening the shot, that intimacy is broken just for a second as we’re reminded that there is a world beyond the two of them and ilya is still in russia. what he’s doing is incredibly dangerous. then the camera tightens back into a close up as he realises he needs to say it anyway because all that matters is that he’s on the phone with shane and he’s in love with him. it really is just the two of them in this moment and he doesn’t want to let anyone else in.

the camera being in a tight close up on both ilya and shane for the entirety of this scene, except for the moment when ilya is working up the courage to say he’s in love. it’s like for the whole conversation it’s just the two of them, there’s nobody else who matters, and then for a brief moment the shot widens as ilya considers the implications of the fact he’s in love with shane. the fact that the rest of the world DOES matter and will always be a presence in their relationship. we’ve been held in this moment between the two of them and by widening the shot, that intimacy is broken just for a second as we’re reminded that there is a world beyond the two of them and ilya is still in russia. what he’s doing is incredibly dangerous. then the camera tightens back into a close up as he realises he needs to say it anyway because all that matters is that he’s on the phone with shane and he’s in love with him. it really is just the two of them in this moment and he doesn’t want to let anyone else in.

frances 🏒

293,756 views • 6 months ago

Lex Fridman asked Elon Musk what the meaning of life is. His answer was not what anyone expected. We do not know, he said. And that is exactly why we need to expand consciousness. Not to find the answer. To ask better questions. He believes the universe is full of things we cannot even formulate yet. We are like children trying to understand calculus. The problem is not that calculus is too hard. The problem is that we have not developed enough to know it exists. Consciousness, to him, is a tool for exploring the universe. The more of it we have, the better our questions become. The better our questions become, the closer we get to understanding what any of this means. This is why he builds rockets and brain interfaces and AI. Not because he has the answers. Because he thinks the only way to get them is to expand what we are capable of thinking. Most people spend their lives looking for meaning. Elon is building the tools to look for it at a scale we cannot yet imagine.

Lex Fridman asked Elon Musk what the meaning of life is. His answer was not what anyone expected. We do not know, he said. And that is exactly why we need to expand consciousness. Not to find the answer. To ask better questions. He believes the universe is full of things we cannot even formulate yet. We are like children trying to understand calculus. The problem is not that calculus is too hard. The problem is that we have not developed enough to know it exists. Consciousness, to him, is a tool for exploring the universe. The more of it we have, the better our questions become. The better our questions become, the closer we get to understanding what any of this means. This is why he builds rockets and brain interfaces and AI. Not because he has the answers. Because he thinks the only way to get them is to expand what we are capable of thinking. Most people spend their lives looking for meaning. Elon is building the tools to look for it at a scale we cannot yet imagine.

Shruti

16,744 views • 25 days ago

Kamala Harris: Donald Trump is the first President of the United States since World War II who does not believe in the alliances that we have with friendly nations. Look what he did as it relates and what he has been doing as it relates to Ukraine.

Kamala Harris: Donald Trump is the first President of the United States since World War II who does not believe in the alliances that we have with friendly nations. Look what he did as it relates and what he has been doing as it relates to Ukraine.

Kate from Kharkiv

19,454 views • 3 months ago

US Vice President J.D. Vance made a sharp statement warning Russia that it will be "very bad" for them if they do not actively engage in "good-faith" negotiations on Ukraine. According to Vance, Trump believes the conflict harms everyone – Russia, Ukraine, and America – and is dissatisfied that Russia allegedly is not sufficiently committed to a peaceful resolution. "And here is what I will say about the president: he is keenly responsive to the reality on the ground. And the reality is this: first, we have conducted incredibly good-faith negotiations with both the Russians and the Ukrainians. And I believe the president is becoming increasingly impatient with the Russians because he feels they are not offering enough to end the war. That is first. Second, the president is increasingly convinced that this war is bad for Russia. You constantly hear this from me. You constantly hear this from the president. The war is bad for Russia. It is bad for Ukraine. It is bad for America. We want the killings to stop. That remains the president's position. But the president can also look at the reality on the ground. He sees economic indicators coming from Eastern Europe. He sees the number of casualties, both Russian and Ukrainian, in this war. And the president tells Vladimir Putin that it is time to stop the killings. He would say this to Zelensky as well, and essentially has said this to Zelensky. He wants this war to end, and he is doing everything possible to stop it. But listen, if the Russians refuse to negotiate in good faith, I think it will be very, very bad for their country. That is what the president has made clear. This is not a change of position. This is an acknowledgment of the reality on the ground. We will continue to fight for peace every day in the Trump administration." They are losing and are desperate to pressure Russia to agree to Minsk 3. What they don’t say is - Russia gave their terms in summer of 2024 and their position has never changed, as such accept and fulfill Russia’s conditions and the war will end .

US Vice President J.D. Vance made a sharp statement warning Russia that it will be "very bad" for them if they do not actively engage in "good-faith" negotiations on Ukraine. According to Vance, Trump believes the conflict harms everyone – Russia, Ukraine, and America – and is dissatisfied that Russia allegedly is not sufficiently committed to a peaceful resolution. "And here is what I will say about the president: he is keenly responsive to the reality on the ground. And the reality is this: first, we have conducted incredibly good-faith negotiations with both the Russians and the Ukrainians. And I believe the president is becoming increasingly impatient with the Russians because he feels they are not offering enough to end the war. That is first. Second, the president is increasingly convinced that this war is bad for Russia. You constantly hear this from me. You constantly hear this from the president. The war is bad for Russia. It is bad for Ukraine. It is bad for America. We want the killings to stop. That remains the president's position. But the president can also look at the reality on the ground. He sees economic indicators coming from Eastern Europe. He sees the number of casualties, both Russian and Ukrainian, in this war. And the president tells Vladimir Putin that it is time to stop the killings. He would say this to Zelensky as well, and essentially has said this to Zelensky. He wants this war to end, and he is doing everything possible to stop it. But listen, if the Russians refuse to negotiate in good faith, I think it will be very, very bad for their country. That is what the president has made clear. This is not a change of position. This is an acknowledgment of the reality on the ground. We will continue to fight for peace every day in the Trump administration." They are losing and are desperate to pressure Russia to agree to Minsk 3. What they don’t say is - Russia gave their terms in summer of 2024 and their position has never changed, as such accept and fulfill Russia’s conditions and the war will end .

Dagny Taggart

55,272 views • 9 months ago

“Iran is not going to declare an end to the war while Israel is still attacking Lebanon. It has to be part of the deal. And of course, Bibi won’t play ball because he doesn’t want the war to end. And Trump is just waking up to that fact three months into the war, and he’s not happy about it.” “A lot of what he’s saying is that Bibi should do everything that he says. And now he’s learning that that’s not the way the world works. So constantly over the past three months, Trump is confronted by reality, which totally contradicts the made up story he has about the Iran war in his head. And guess what? In the end, reality is winning out.” “And that’s why we’re in the quagmire we’re in. Because Trump won’t accept the reality. He only wants the world to bend to what’s in his head. In this case, he’s not getting what he wants, so he’s throwing a tantrum.”

“Iran is not going to declare an end to the war while Israel is still attacking Lebanon. It has to be part of the deal. And of course, Bibi won’t play ball because he doesn’t want the war to end. And Trump is just waking up to that fact three months into the war, and he’s not happy about it.” “A lot of what he’s saying is that Bibi should do everything that he says. And now he’s learning that that’s not the way the world works. So constantly over the past three months, Trump is confronted by reality, which totally contradicts the made up story he has about the Iran war in his head. And guess what? In the end, reality is winning out.” “And that’s why we’re in the quagmire we’re in. Because Trump won’t accept the reality. He only wants the world to bend to what’s in his head. In this case, he’s not getting what he wants, so he’s throwing a tantrum.”

Josh Rogin

13,207 views • 1 month ago

AOC on Vance/Watergate: I think what it reveals more is about what JD Vance’s vision for America is, is that he wants more of the same. He doesn't want anything to change in this country. He wants to continue the reality that corruption is banal, normal. And he loves the way that the country is being governed right now. He loves that you can start an illegal war and make tons of people rich, send Americans into harm's way, and that it'll barely be a blip in on people's radar. He loves that we can engage in record levels of corruption and get away with it. And so in that statement, it's less about the acknowledgment of the reality, but it's that his vision for the future is exactly the same, and that your life won't change if so long as he's in charge.

AOC on Vance/Watergate: I think what it reveals more is about what JD Vance’s vision for America is, is that he wants more of the same. He doesn't want anything to change in this country. He wants to continue the reality that corruption is banal, normal. And he loves the way that the country is being governed right now. He loves that you can start an illegal war and make tons of people rich, send Americans into harm's way, and that it'll barely be a blip in on people's radar. He loves that we can engage in record levels of corruption and get away with it. And so in that statement, it's less about the acknowledgment of the reality, but it's that his vision for the future is exactly the same, and that your life won't change if so long as he's in charge.

Acyn

81,990 views • 16 days ago

“One of the things this ideology has done is for the individual is to set a very low bar as to what it means to achieve something. We are cultivating a subculture that believes play acting as the other sex is their life goal…” Similarly, it is such a low bar to be thought of as smart or brave for just saying “men aren’t women”. It’s not smart or brave. It’s obvious. It’s normal. It’s the absolute bare minimum.

“One of the things this ideology has done is for the individual is to set a very low bar as to what it means to achieve something. We are cultivating a subculture that believes play acting as the other sex is their life goal…” Similarly, it is such a low bar to be thought of as smart or brave for just saying “men aren’t women”. It’s not smart or brave. It’s obvious. It’s normal. It’s the absolute bare minimum.

Sall Grover

47,582 views • 6 months ago

The Christian kvetching over this clip is pathetic. Here is the full context. In the interview Spielberg is not calling for the abolition or subversion of Christianity or the Church. The film literally includes a cardinal, a nun quoting scripture, and believers wrestling with what alien life would mean for their faith. Spielberg's conclusion is not that Christianity is false, but that god would still have dominion over alien life just as he does over humanity. This is directly out of mainstream Catholic theology. His point is the opposite of what people are claiming. He is suggesting that the creator god shared by Jews and Christians rules the entire universe, and that aliens or other unexplained phenomena would ultimately fall under that god's authority and reinforce it. That is the psyop, not "Christianity is being destroyed/subverted." Jews are not trying to destroy Christianity. Enough of this insecurity and persecution complex. Even by arguing this it shows that you have no idea what is going on.

The Christian kvetching over this clip is pathetic. Here is the full context. In the interview Spielberg is not calling for the abolition or subversion of Christianity or the Church. The film literally includes a cardinal, a nun quoting scripture, and believers wrestling with what alien life would mean for their faith. Spielberg's conclusion is not that Christianity is false, but that god would still have dominion over alien life just as he does over humanity. This is directly out of mainstream Catholic theology. His point is the opposite of what people are claiming. He is suggesting that the creator god shared by Jews and Christians rules the entire universe, and that aliens or other unexplained phenomena would ultimately fall under that god's authority and reinforce it. That is the psyop, not "Christianity is being destroyed/subverted." Jews are not trying to destroy Christianity. Enough of this insecurity and persecution complex. Even by arguing this it shows that you have no idea what is going on.

NeedMoreAmalek

18,305 views • 1 month ago

.Kamala Harris: "This is the first president in the United States since World War II, who does not believe in the alliances we have with friendly nations…look what he did as it relates, and what he has been doing as it relates to Ukraine."

.Kamala Harris: "This is the first president in the United States since World War II, who does not believe in the alliances we have with friendly nations…look what he did as it relates, and what he has been doing as it relates to Ukraine."

CSPAN

26,744 views • 3 months ago

In a World full of actors, Elon Musk is real “What I care about is the reality of goodness, not the perception of it, and what I see all over the place is people who care about looking good while doing evil”

In a World full of actors, Elon Musk is real “What I care about is the reality of goodness, not the perception of it, and what I see all over the place is people who care about looking good while doing evil”

SMX 🇺🇸

28,178 views • 2 months ago

Cain: It is really hard not to see this through the lens of the art of the deal. Trump makes a demand and that is the purchase of Greenland. He is immediately rebuffed. He amps up the demand…we wind up back in a place where perhaps it’s not full ownership but it is a deal…. Nobody understands the lesson of what is happening. It’s the art of the deal.

Cain: It is really hard not to see this through the lens of the art of the deal. Trump makes a demand and that is the purchase of Greenland. He is immediately rebuffed. He amps up the demand…we wind up back in a place where perhaps it’s not full ownership but it is a deal…. Nobody understands the lesson of what is happening. It’s the art of the deal.

Acyn

133,292 views • 5 months ago

At a Q&A, John MacArthur is asked about Christian nationalism. The kingdom of God is not of this world. Jesus said that. He said, “My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, My servants would [fight].” His kingdom is not of this world. The kingdom of this world is a separate world; they’re not linked together. Let me say it another way: Nothing that happens in any nation, whether it’s a Communist nation, a Muslim nation, or a “quasi-Christian” nation, or an atheistic nation—nothing in that nation politically, socially has anything to do with the advancement of the kingdom of God, because the kingdom of God is separate from that system. God, in His sovereignty, is building His church, “and the gates of Hades will not prevail against it,” Jesus said. So the idea that you should link up some political effort, some political process, some social process, some gain of power or influence in a culture as part of the advance of Christianity is alien to Christianity. You never have our Lord approaching anything like that, nor the apostles, and particularly the apostle Paul. He sought to gain no favor with the Roman Empire whatsoever, or for that matter, with any other of the rulers that he ran into during his life. Now, that is not to say that we are indifferent to what happens in the nation. We’ve been talking about that the last couple of Sunday mornings. We have to be the people who uphold righteousness. When we come to vote, we want to vote for that which is the most righteous option. Obviously, we can’t vote in righteousness, but we have to vote in a way that reflects our commitment to the righteousness of God. So we couldn’t possibly elect somebody who was an abortionist, somebody who was LGBTQ or LGBTQ-affirming, or any other deviation from God’s righteous moral standard. So it gets harder, doesn’t it, nowadays, because even sometimes when politicians are more conservative and anti-abortion, they may be sinful and wicked in some other categories, and it’s very hard to find out who is really honest and who is simply dishonest and seeking power. But in the end, we do what we can with the understanding that the responsibility of the church is not to advance the kingdom of this world. That’s a faulty viewpoint. Christian nationalism is usually tied to what is called post-millennialism, and that is the view that the church, somehow, by influencing the culture, can bring in the kingdom of Christ. In other words, it’s the idea not that Christ returns and sets up His kingdom, but that the church establishes His kingdom and then hands it to Him. That is not what Scripture teaches. What Scripture teaches is what we’re learning from the book of Revelation. Things are going to get worse and worse and worse. And the end of human history is not the church triumphant, reigning in the world and taking over the structures of human kingdoms; that’s not what happens. At the end of human history, the believers are persecuted and murdered, and that’s the very opposite of what Christian nationalism would anticipate. So we believe the Bible teaches that things get worse and worse, headed toward the wrath of God, which we’re seeing in Revelation, and then our Lord returns, Himself, to establish His kingdom is clearly what we read in the book of Revelation. OK?

At a Q&A, John MacArthur is asked about Christian nationalism. The kingdom of God is not of this world. Jesus said that. He said, “My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, My servants would [fight].” His kingdom is not of this world. The kingdom of this world is a separate world; they’re not linked together. Let me say it another way: Nothing that happens in any nation, whether it’s a Communist nation, a Muslim nation, or a “quasi-Christian” nation, or an atheistic nation—nothing in that nation politically, socially has anything to do with the advancement of the kingdom of God, because the kingdom of God is separate from that system. God, in His sovereignty, is building His church, “and the gates of Hades will not prevail against it,” Jesus said. So the idea that you should link up some political effort, some political process, some social process, some gain of power or influence in a culture as part of the advance of Christianity is alien to Christianity. You never have our Lord approaching anything like that, nor the apostles, and particularly the apostle Paul. He sought to gain no favor with the Roman Empire whatsoever, or for that matter, with any other of the rulers that he ran into during his life. Now, that is not to say that we are indifferent to what happens in the nation. We’ve been talking about that the last couple of Sunday mornings. We have to be the people who uphold righteousness. When we come to vote, we want to vote for that which is the most righteous option. Obviously, we can’t vote in righteousness, but we have to vote in a way that reflects our commitment to the righteousness of God. So we couldn’t possibly elect somebody who was an abortionist, somebody who was LGBTQ or LGBTQ-affirming, or any other deviation from God’s righteous moral standard. So it gets harder, doesn’t it, nowadays, because even sometimes when politicians are more conservative and anti-abortion, they may be sinful and wicked in some other categories, and it’s very hard to find out who is really honest and who is simply dishonest and seeking power. But in the end, we do what we can with the understanding that the responsibility of the church is not to advance the kingdom of this world. That’s a faulty viewpoint. Christian nationalism is usually tied to what is called post-millennialism, and that is the view that the church, somehow, by influencing the culture, can bring in the kingdom of Christ. In other words, it’s the idea not that Christ returns and sets up His kingdom, but that the church establishes His kingdom and then hands it to Him. That is not what Scripture teaches. What Scripture teaches is what we’re learning from the book of Revelation. Things are going to get worse and worse and worse. And the end of human history is not the church triumphant, reigning in the world and taking over the structures of human kingdoms; that’s not what happens. At the end of human history, the believers are persecuted and murdered, and that’s the very opposite of what Christian nationalism would anticipate. So we believe the Bible teaches that things get worse and worse, headed toward the wrath of God, which we’re seeing in Revelation, and then our Lord returns, Himself, to establish His kingdom is clearly what we read in the book of Revelation. OK?

Terri Green

12,152 views • 2 days ago

According to Jay anyone is allowed to say the n word as long as theyre not "mean" and the only reason he doesnt say it is because he doesnt want to lose his sponsorships. If he wasnt a streamer, hed say it. Not because saying 'nigga' is inherently wrong and racist. What a world we live in folks.

According to Jay anyone is allowed to say the n word as long as theyre not "mean" and the only reason he doesnt say it is because he doesnt want to lose his sponsorships. If he wasnt a streamer, hed say it. Not because saying 'nigga' is inherently wrong and racist. What a world we live in folks.

Tiffy TD

14,712 views • 4 months ago

‼️ President Zelensky is not just a great leader. He is a visionary. The following is from his sitcom “Servant of the People” but it describes perfectly what took place in the Oval Office with Trump and Vance. “I want to thank you for the time you’ve spent on us as well as for a very meaningful discussion. And with a feeling of deep gratitude, I want to say: “Go screw yourself!” This is mandatory to fulfill. We are not beggars and not gastarbeiters. I want everyone to remember once and for all - we are not the outskirts, nor the border region between the Orcs and the Elves! We are a normal, strong, beautiful, and rich country. And the fact that right now we are on the ground is not a reason to bend us over.”

‼️ President Zelensky is not just a great leader. He is a visionary. The following is from his sitcom “Servant of the People” but it describes perfectly what took place in the Oval Office with Trump and Vance. “I want to thank you for the time you’ve spent on us as well as for a very meaningful discussion. And with a feeling of deep gratitude, I want to say: “Go screw yourself!” This is mandatory to fulfill. We are not beggars and not gastarbeiters. I want everyone to remember once and for all - we are not the outskirts, nor the border region between the Orcs and the Elves! We are a normal, strong, beautiful, and rich country. And the fact that right now we are on the ground is not a reason to bend us over.”

Natalka

34,725 views • 1 year ago

We are back in the terrain of whose mandate, between the National Commissioner and the Minister of police is to do what? Bahlali, the Minister is in trouble. Mchunu is asked who would have determined and decided that work of a Task Team is done and it can now be disbanded. He answers that it would have been the Minister, “possibly” using his powers in Section 207 (2). Except he misdirects himself. The powers in that section, as he describes, are those of National Commissioner. NOT the Minister!

We are back in the terrain of whose mandate, between the National Commissioner and the Minister of police is to do what? Bahlali, the Minister is in trouble. Mchunu is asked who would have determined and decided that work of a Task Team is done and it can now be disbanded. He answers that it would have been the Minister, “possibly” using his powers in Section 207 (2). Except he misdirects himself. The powers in that section, as he describes, are those of National Commissioner. NOT the Minister!

Sabelo Chalufu | @BetterGovZA 🇿🇦

80,223 views • 8 months ago

Jensen Huang explains how he designed NVIDIA from first principles “With respect to building a company, the first thing you have to do—as with all problems—is start from first principles. What is this machine that we’re trying to create? What is its input? What is its output? What are the conditions that it’s in? What is the industry like? Is it a fast moving industry? Is it a bureaucratic industry? Is it a highly regulated industry? And what are you trying to build?” Thinking about it from this perspective, there were several things Jensen wanted to do with the company: “I wanted to create a company that naturally attracts amazing people, and the reason for that is our company’s mission is to solve computing problems that are barely possible.” He also wanted a company that was “as small as possible” and “empowered people.” “If you want an organization that obeys command and control, then you make it a pyramid just like the military—all the way back to the Roman Empire. But If you want to empower people, you want to make it as flat as possible so that information travels quickly.” He continues: “We also don’t have business units. We don’t have divisions. Everybody works as one, and the company is shaped in a way that allows us to build accelerated computing best.” Video source: Sana (2023)

Jensen Huang explains how he designed NVIDIA from first principles “With respect to building a company, the first thing you have to do—as with all problems—is start from first principles. What is this machine that we’re trying to create? What is its input? What is its output? What are the conditions that it’s in? What is the industry like? Is it a fast moving industry? Is it a bureaucratic industry? Is it a highly regulated industry? And what are you trying to build?” Thinking about it from this perspective, there were several things Jensen wanted to do with the company: “I wanted to create a company that naturally attracts amazing people, and the reason for that is our company’s mission is to solve computing problems that are barely possible.” He also wanted a company that was “as small as possible” and “empowered people.” “If you want an organization that obeys command and control, then you make it a pyramid just like the military—all the way back to the Roman Empire. But If you want to empower people, you want to make it as flat as possible so that information travels quickly.” He continues: “We also don’t have business units. We don’t have divisions. Everybody works as one, and the company is shaped in a way that allows us to build accelerated computing best.” Video source: Sana (2023)

Startup Archive

63,899 views • 9 months ago