Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

THIS SHAMELESS MAN DOESN'T EVEN HESITATE WHILE LYING THROUGH TEETH! "Either General Naravane is lying or else Penguin is lying. I believe Naravane won’t lie. Naravane's 2023 Tweet proves book is published"- Rahul Ghandy Abe Jan-Nalayak, tweet says 'AVAILABLE FOR PRE-ORDER'. It does not mean a book has already...

MumbaichaDon's profile picture

BhikuMhatre

228,823 subscribers

82,443 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

VIDEO | Parliament Budget Session: BJP MP Nishikant Dubey, on Rahul Gandhi, says, “I had informed you this morning that the publisher, Penguin India, tweeted on social media stating that no such book, whether in PDF, Kindle, digital, or physical form, has been published. When the book has not been published, how did Rahul Gandhi get it? The statement issued by General Naravane also confirms that the book has not been published. If the book has not been published, not sold, and is not available with anyone, then don’t you think this amounts to a conspiracy against the Constitution of the country? Just like the Constitution, if written only on a page without content, is merely a piece of paper, such acts go against Dr. BR Ambedkar’s vision for the Constitution.” (Full video available on
1:49

VIDEO | Parliament Budget Session: BJP MP Nishikant Dubey, on Rahul Gandhi, says, “I had informed you this morning that the publisher, Penguin India, tweeted on social media stating that no such book, whether in PDF, Kindle, digital, or physical form, has been published. When the book has not been published, how did Rahul Gandhi get it? The statement issued by General Naravane also confirms that the book has not been published. If the book has not been published, not sold, and is not available with anyone, then don’t you think this amounts to a conspiracy against the Constitution of the country? Just like the Constitution, if written only on a page without content, is merely a piece of paper, such acts go against Dr. BR Ambedkar’s vision for the Constitution.” (Full video available on

Press Trust of India

29,774 views • 5 months ago

OMG😳 Sonia Ghandy chose Priyanka Vadra over Rahul? Reportedly, Sonia Ghandy was also consulted before naming Keralam CONgress CM. She insisted on saying 'chose someone who can hold party together' If true, what an insult to Jan-Nalayak! Does it mean Sonia feels RaGa's man KC Venugopal can't hold party together? Has RaGa's credibility lowered in his mother's eyes also after losing spree of elections? Is Priyanka getting set to take over CONgress Pvt Ltd? Are RaGa's alleged dual citizenship case & now disproportionate assets case reason behind this? Or is it pure distrust in RaGa's leadership? Whatever maybe the case, but imposition of VD Satheesan as Keralam CM is a BIG BIG JOLT to Jan-Nalayak! And wait! Report says 'Sonia Ghandy was ALSO consulted'! Does it mean now she doesn't have control over the Pvt Ltd as earlier she used to have? Has RaGa sidelined her now for personal gain? This Family is a Big Mystery for sure!
4:27

OMG😳 Sonia Ghandy chose Priyanka Vadra over Rahul? Reportedly, Sonia Ghandy was also consulted before naming Keralam CONgress CM. She insisted on saying 'chose someone who can hold party together' If true, what an insult to Jan-Nalayak! Does it mean Sonia feels RaGa's man KC Venugopal can't hold party together? Has RaGa's credibility lowered in his mother's eyes also after losing spree of elections? Is Priyanka getting set to take over CONgress Pvt Ltd? Are RaGa's alleged dual citizenship case & now disproportionate assets case reason behind this? Or is it pure distrust in RaGa's leadership? Whatever maybe the case, but imposition of VD Satheesan as Keralam CM is a BIG BIG JOLT to Jan-Nalayak! And wait! Report says 'Sonia Ghandy was ALSO consulted'! Does it mean now she doesn't have control over the Pvt Ltd as earlier she used to have? Has RaGa sidelined her now for personal gain? This Family is a Big Mystery for sure!

BhikuMhatre

46,569 views • 2 months ago

#WATCH | Delhi: On Lok Sabha LoP Rahul Gandhi's statement inside the Parliament, Congress MP Shashi Tharoor says, "I think there was an overreaction by the government side because as far as I understood, what Rahul ji wished to raise was a matter that is already in the public domain. He was basing himself on a published article in the Caravan magazine, which quotes a memoir by General Naravane that is still unpublished. So the government, instead of objecting to the fact that the book has not been published, should have let him speak because, in any case, the magazine is publicly available. Anyone can read the same article that Rahulji has read. It seems to me that the overreaction of the government has needlessly paralysed the house this afternoon. And to my mind, frankly, it would have been healthy for parliament to have allowed the discussion to proceed, which is what parliament is for... The best answer, if the facts are wrong, is to correct the facts, not to prevent the facts from being aired..."
3:11

#WATCH | Delhi: On Lok Sabha LoP Rahul Gandhi's statement inside the Parliament, Congress MP Shashi Tharoor says, "I think there was an overreaction by the government side because as far as I understood, what Rahul ji wished to raise was a matter that is already in the public domain. He was basing himself on a published article in the Caravan magazine, which quotes a memoir by General Naravane that is still unpublished. So the government, instead of objecting to the fact that the book has not been published, should have let him speak because, in any case, the magazine is publicly available. Anyone can read the same article that Rahulji has read. It seems to me that the overreaction of the government has needlessly paralysed the house this afternoon. And to my mind, frankly, it would have been healthy for parliament to have allowed the discussion to proceed, which is what parliament is for... The best answer, if the facts are wrong, is to correct the facts, not to prevent the facts from being aired..."

ANI

53,957 views • 5 months ago

Sub: General Naravane says🚨👇 🆘General Naravane clarified last year that his job was to write the book and hand it over to the Publisher, which he has done. ▪️He says, now the ball is in the publisher’s and Ministry of Defence’s Court. ▪️General Naravane is a student of RSS run Jnana Prabodhini School, Pune. ▪️Definitely, General Naravane is more PATRIOTIC than Narendra Modi or Amit Shah or Rajnath Singh or even Ajit Doval for that matter, by virtue of him defending our borders, our Nation. ▪️The General, who took education in RSS school, who served the Nation with pride and honour, was abandoned by RSS bred Modi Regime❗️How shall the Bhakts, Godi Media, defend this❓ ▪️The problem is not about National security then. It is about Narendra Modi and Amit Shah led Regime’s Insecurity. Their failures to deal with China, the USA and the superpowers, getting exposed is the problem. ▪️The author of the article in Caravan, a veteran Military Officer and a distinguished defence analyst, Shri. Sushant Singh Sushant Singh is also more patriotic than any of the Ministers in Modi Regime. ▪️It is for the Nation to decide now and force the lesser Patriotic, dubious politicians to release General Naravane’s book. And to hold Modi Regime to account on the details in the book. P.S. - Modi Regime couldn’t decide on giving CLEAR ORDERS within 2 hours. And it’s been over two years it hasn’t decided about clearing General’s book for publication. Modi Regime turns out to be the most indecisive Regime in the history of India.
1:15

Sub: General Naravane says🚨👇 🆘General Naravane clarified last year that his job was to write the book and hand it over to the Publisher, which he has done. ▪️He says, now the ball is in the publisher’s and Ministry of Defence’s Court. ▪️General Naravane is a student of RSS run Jnana Prabodhini School, Pune. ▪️Definitely, General Naravane is more PATRIOTIC than Narendra Modi or Amit Shah or Rajnath Singh or even Ajit Doval for that matter, by virtue of him defending our borders, our Nation. ▪️The General, who took education in RSS school, who served the Nation with pride and honour, was abandoned by RSS bred Modi Regime❗️How shall the Bhakts, Godi Media, defend this❓ ▪️The problem is not about National security then. It is about Narendra Modi and Amit Shah led Regime’s Insecurity. Their failures to deal with China, the USA and the superpowers, getting exposed is the problem. ▪️The author of the article in Caravan, a veteran Military Officer and a distinguished defence analyst, Shri. Sushant Singh Sushant Singh is also more patriotic than any of the Ministers in Modi Regime. ▪️It is for the Nation to decide now and force the lesser Patriotic, dubious politicians to release General Naravane’s book. And to hold Modi Regime to account on the details in the book. P.S. - Modi Regime couldn’t decide on giving CLEAR ORDERS within 2 hours. And it’s been over two years it hasn’t decided about clearing General’s book for publication. Modi Regime turns out to be the most indecisive Regime in the history of India.

Raju Parulekar

51,035 views • 5 months ago

My questions for Rahul Gandhi! India will never allow you or your party to use our Army as a political PAWN . 1. Parliament runs on a Rule Book, not propaganda. Quoting any book or memoir requires an original source. Yet you insist on weaponising an unpublished, unauthorised manuscript of Gen Manoj Naravane after it was ruled inadmissible. Why? Because facts on record demolish your narrative. 2. The same former Army Chief has publicly stated that not an inch of Indian land was lost—a fact you conveniently ignore while cherry-picking leaked lines to cast doubts on the Government and indirectly on the Army. 3.And if The Caravan is your gospel truth, then have the honesty to own its virulent attacks on your own party. Its Executive Editor Hartosh Singh Bal has repeatedly described Congress under the Gandhis as hollow, directionless, elitist—and has held Indira Gandhi responsible for disastrous misadventures like Punjab. Will you take responsibility for that history too? Or is belief in journalism strictly selective—only when it suits attacking the Govt and the Armed Forces? Parliament is not your op-ed page. India’s Army is not your political prop. This isn’t dissent—it’s deliberate narrative warfare, and the country sees through it. Rahul Gandhi Congress
5:05

My questions for Rahul Gandhi! India will never allow you or your party to use our Army as a political PAWN . 1. Parliament runs on a Rule Book, not propaganda. Quoting any book or memoir requires an original source. Yet you insist on weaponising an unpublished, unauthorised manuscript of Gen Manoj Naravane after it was ruled inadmissible. Why? Because facts on record demolish your narrative. 2. The same former Army Chief has publicly stated that not an inch of Indian land was lost—a fact you conveniently ignore while cherry-picking leaked lines to cast doubts on the Government and indirectly on the Army. 3.And if The Caravan is your gospel truth, then have the honesty to own its virulent attacks on your own party. Its Executive Editor Hartosh Singh Bal has repeatedly described Congress under the Gandhis as hollow, directionless, elitist—and has held Indira Gandhi responsible for disastrous misadventures like Punjab. Will you take responsibility for that history too? Or is belief in journalism strictly selective—only when it suits attacking the Govt and the Armed Forces? Parliament is not your op-ed page. India’s Army is not your political prop. This isn’t dissent—it’s deliberate narrative warfare, and the country sees through it. Rahul Gandhi Congress

Shazia Ilmi

20,700 views • 5 months ago

Superhuman CEO Rahul Vohra on the secret to product virality After his first startup Rapportive was acquired by LinkedIn, Rahul reported directly to LinkedIn’s Head of Growth Elliot Shmukler. Elliot was responsible for scaling LinkedIn from 25 million users to north of 250 million by the time Rahul joined. In their first 1-on-1, Rahul asked Elliot to teach him everything he knew about virality. Elliot responded: “I hate to burst your bubble, but there is no such thing as a truly viral product… No app has sustained a viral factor of greater than 1 for any real period of time. Even Facebook in its heyday had a viral factor of about 0.7, and that lasted for only a year — one person was creating about 0.7 new users.” Rahul then asked Elliot about LinkedIn’s infamous address book import that invited all of a user’s contacts to LinkedIn. Surely that had a viral factor greater than 1? Elliot responds: “That’s an amazing feature, but you have to remember that not everyone is going to use it all the time. So even that feature had a lifetime viral factor of about 0.4, and that’s considered good. 0.6 is great. And 0.7 is incredible — you’re in the stratosphere up with Facebook.” Given that all of these viral mechanics eventually asymptote, Rahul asks: “What then is the true secret to virality?” Elliot replies: “It is word of mouth. It is the virality you can’t measure that isn’t mechanic or feature. It is when one user spontaneously tells another user about your product.” Elon Musk offers similar advice: “I think that really the way to sell any product is through word of mouth. The key is to have a product that people love… If you just like something and it’s ok, you’re not gonna care that much. But if you love it, you’re going to talk about it. And then that generates word of mouth. And that’s basically how our sales [at Tesla] have grown. We don’t spend any money on advertising or endorsements.” Video source: Lenny Rachitsky (2025)
2:14

Superhuman CEO Rahul Vohra on the secret to product virality After his first startup Rapportive was acquired by LinkedIn, Rahul reported directly to LinkedIn’s Head of Growth Elliot Shmukler. Elliot was responsible for scaling LinkedIn from 25 million users to north of 250 million by the time Rahul joined. In their first 1-on-1, Rahul asked Elliot to teach him everything he knew about virality. Elliot responded: “I hate to burst your bubble, but there is no such thing as a truly viral product… No app has sustained a viral factor of greater than 1 for any real period of time. Even Facebook in its heyday had a viral factor of about 0.7, and that lasted for only a year — one person was creating about 0.7 new users.” Rahul then asked Elliot about LinkedIn’s infamous address book import that invited all of a user’s contacts to LinkedIn. Surely that had a viral factor greater than 1? Elliot responds: “That’s an amazing feature, but you have to remember that not everyone is going to use it all the time. So even that feature had a lifetime viral factor of about 0.4, and that’s considered good. 0.6 is great. And 0.7 is incredible — you’re in the stratosphere up with Facebook.” Given that all of these viral mechanics eventually asymptote, Rahul asks: “What then is the true secret to virality?” Elliot replies: “It is word of mouth. It is the virality you can’t measure that isn’t mechanic or feature. It is when one user spontaneously tells another user about your product.” Elon Musk offers similar advice: “I think that really the way to sell any product is through word of mouth. The key is to have a product that people love… If you just like something and it’s ok, you’re not gonna care that much. But if you love it, you’re going to talk about it. And then that generates word of mouth. And that’s basically how our sales [at Tesla] have grown. We don’t spend any money on advertising or endorsements.” Video source: Lenny Rachitsky (2025)

Startup Archive

37,974 views • 1 year ago

Senegal Debts and Kenyan lessons. Senegal is currently in turbulence in debt management. Upon assuming office, the current government led by President Diomaye Faye and PM Ousmane Sonko realised that the previous government led by President Macky Sall had borrowed around $13Bn in Secret loans "Off the Book". Meaning the amount was not included in the mainstream Debt book. We must as a country avoid falling in that kind of an abyss. The National debt in Kenya is now over Ksh 12.5 Trillion. This is the loan book. We are borrowing Ksh 3.5Bn to Ksh4Bn every day. I mean Net borrowing. What is borrowed to pay previous loans not included. Unfortunately, on top of this and besides the mainstream borrowing, the Government is also for the 1st time borrowing off the Book without transparency. 1. Securitisation - The government has already borrowed Ksh 175Bn by offering as security fuel levy that is to be collected for the next 7 years. The process is underway for another over 100Bn on the same. 2. Talanta Bond - GoK borrowed through a bond Kah 44.5Bn, offering as security money that is to be collected by Sports Fund for the next 15 years. The interest alone for the Ksh 44.5 Bn loan will be 100Bn after that period. 3. Tourism Fund. The fund is effectively also on the same line and path. 4. Plans are underway to take around Ksh 400Bn loan by offering Housing Levy that is to be collected in the next many years as security. Basically collecting Housing Levy in advance. 5. The National Treasury is also in the process of forming an "Infrastructure Fund" which will is also a vehicle of borrowing more off the book. This is how it is working - Create a fund, then institute levies, then use the history of the Levy collected to borrow secretly off the book. This while is illegal also contrains the future flexibility of the country's fiscals or funds. All these Funds and institutions are fully owned by GoK. You cannot therefore treat loans taken by any of the government institution differently, especially non commercial institutions. If the institutions are unable to pay, GoK will pay. That's why w e must not do these kinds of implementation. It is important that Kenyans know this. Ramifications will definitely come. I hope sanity reigns and we avert a catastrophe by acting differently. We are African and Africa is our Business..
5:54

Senegal Debts and Kenyan lessons. Senegal is currently in turbulence in debt management. Upon assuming office, the current government led by President Diomaye Faye and PM Ousmane Sonko realised that the previous government led by President Macky Sall had borrowed around $13Bn in Secret loans "Off the Book". Meaning the amount was not included in the mainstream Debt book. We must as a country avoid falling in that kind of an abyss. The National debt in Kenya is now over Ksh 12.5 Trillion. This is the loan book. We are borrowing Ksh 3.5Bn to Ksh4Bn every day. I mean Net borrowing. What is borrowed to pay previous loans not included. Unfortunately, on top of this and besides the mainstream borrowing, the Government is also for the 1st time borrowing off the Book without transparency. 1. Securitisation - The government has already borrowed Ksh 175Bn by offering as security fuel levy that is to be collected for the next 7 years. The process is underway for another over 100Bn on the same. 2. Talanta Bond - GoK borrowed through a bond Kah 44.5Bn, offering as security money that is to be collected by Sports Fund for the next 15 years. The interest alone for the Ksh 44.5 Bn loan will be 100Bn after that period. 3. Tourism Fund. The fund is effectively also on the same line and path. 4. Plans are underway to take around Ksh 400Bn loan by offering Housing Levy that is to be collected in the next many years as security. Basically collecting Housing Levy in advance. 5. The National Treasury is also in the process of forming an "Infrastructure Fund" which will is also a vehicle of borrowing more off the book. This is how it is working - Create a fund, then institute levies, then use the history of the Levy collected to borrow secretly off the book. This while is illegal also contrains the future flexibility of the country's fiscals or funds. All these Funds and institutions are fully owned by GoK. You cannot therefore treat loans taken by any of the government institution differently, especially non commercial institutions. If the institutions are unable to pay, GoK will pay. That's why w e must not do these kinds of implementation. It is important that Kenyans know this. Ramifications will definitely come. I hope sanity reigns and we avert a catastrophe by acting differently. We are African and Africa is our Business..

Ndindi Nyoro

132,191 views • 9 months ago

#WATCH | Delhi: Solicitor General Tushar Mehta says, "There are certain rules of interpretation which are followed today. There is rule of some provisions being inclusive and some provisions being exhaustive. Exhaustive means ABCD it doesn't permit you to have E. Indian jurisprudence in law is the only jurisprudence which years back, centuries back permitted this to happen. For example, when American Constitution was made, it provided for a system that the Congress will have to establish army and navy... So an interpretative process was undertaken that army and navy would naturally mean all defence forces which are available at a given point of time. Now that interpretative rule is available in our Indian parlance, in our Indian law, in our Shastric law since time immemorial. For example, if I have a son through my legally wedded wife, it is called auras putra- legitimate child. If I have a child which is either adopted or not through my legally wedded wife, it would be anauras putra. Now some dogmatic doctrines used to be that anaurasputra has neither any rights nor any liabilities. But India is the only country where the rule of liberal interpretation was introduced and said that for the purpose of discharging responsibilities and claiming rights, anauras putra is also to be treated or deemed to be auras putra. Nowhere in the world, this position is emerging..."
4:55

#WATCH | Delhi: Solicitor General Tushar Mehta says, "There are certain rules of interpretation which are followed today. There is rule of some provisions being inclusive and some provisions being exhaustive. Exhaustive means ABCD it doesn't permit you to have E. Indian jurisprudence in law is the only jurisprudence which years back, centuries back permitted this to happen. For example, when American Constitution was made, it provided for a system that the Congress will have to establish army and navy... So an interpretative process was undertaken that army and navy would naturally mean all defence forces which are available at a given point of time. Now that interpretative rule is available in our Indian parlance, in our Indian law, in our Shastric law since time immemorial. For example, if I have a son through my legally wedded wife, it is called auras putra- legitimate child. If I have a child which is either adopted or not through my legally wedded wife, it would be anauras putra. Now some dogmatic doctrines used to be that anaurasputra has neither any rights nor any liabilities. But India is the only country where the rule of liberal interpretation was introduced and said that for the purpose of discharging responsibilities and claiming rights, anauras putra is also to be treated or deemed to be auras putra. Nowhere in the world, this position is emerging..."

ANI

61,476 views • 13 days ago

#WATCH | Delhi | Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) National Spokesperson Ashutosh Ranka says, "This is the biggest movement in India's post-independence history...We have said this very clearly, what happened on 20th was a trailer. If the Govt doesn't agree, millions more will come to Delhi because this time we will not hold back and stay silent...The Govt really needs to get its act together otherwise the Youth of this country is going to take them down very badly...A narrative is trying to be built that we will not be peaceful, but we are. The march on 20th was peacefull too but there was chaos only at the point where Police unleashed brutality and beat up students. The youth is sitting here peacefully for 31 days because we follow the principles of Gandhi and Ambedkar." He also says, "We have placed a very clear demand and Abhijeet Dipke had spoken about it. We will not led any kind of FIR or future FIR be lodged against any protester, the protest won't end without that. As far as our team's leadership is concerned, we are not scared of any FIR, we are ready to be arrested under UAPA and NSA from day 1. Jail is a small price to pay for our fight...Be it any political party, even if they are people from the BJP, they should come together because this is a huge movement and the demand is genuine. We welcome all of them..."
3:32

#WATCH | Delhi | Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) National Spokesperson Ashutosh Ranka says, "This is the biggest movement in India's post-independence history...We have said this very clearly, what happened on 20th was a trailer. If the Govt doesn't agree, millions more will come to Delhi because this time we will not hold back and stay silent...The Govt really needs to get its act together otherwise the Youth of this country is going to take them down very badly...A narrative is trying to be built that we will not be peaceful, but we are. The march on 20th was peacefull too but there was chaos only at the point where Police unleashed brutality and beat up students. The youth is sitting here peacefully for 31 days because we follow the principles of Gandhi and Ambedkar." He also says, "We have placed a very clear demand and Abhijeet Dipke had spoken about it. We will not led any kind of FIR or future FIR be lodged against any protester, the protest won't end without that. As far as our team's leadership is concerned, we are not scared of any FIR, we are ready to be arrested under UAPA and NSA from day 1. Jail is a small price to pay for our fight...Be it any political party, even if they are people from the BJP, they should come together because this is a huge movement and the demand is genuine. We welcome all of them..."

ANI

184,163 views • 2 days ago

AOC has been sick for a while now. She sounds terrible. How many jabs did she get? She posted this video on Thursday talking about not having health insurance while she was a waitress because it was too expensive. AOC had access to Obamacare for years while she was a waitress. So why didn’t she take advantage of it? As a politician, AOC has strongly defended Obamacare. If Obamacare is so great, why wasn’t she on it when she was a waitress? The answer is AOC has been caught lying again. Either she’s lying about not having health insurance when she was a waitress or she’s lying about Obamacare being great. Both can’t be true. If Obamacare is great, then she lied about not being able to afford health insurance. If Obamacare sucks, then she lied about it being great. Here’s AOC’s new quote about not having health insurance (she says people she worked with didn’t have it either): “It really wasn’t that long ago that I didn’t have any health insurance at all when I was a waitress, and that I couldn’t afford health insurance so I just went without. And, frankly, no one I knew that I worked with had health insurance either because they couldn’t afford it either.” The truth likely is that AOC didn’t have health insurance until around when she got elected to Congress and that’s because Obamacare does suck. Which means the truth also is AOC has been lying to the American people for many years now about Obamacare being great. Now—how many jabs did AOC get and has she been getting boosters? Because she ain’t looking good. (aoc on TT)
1:01

AOC has been sick for a while now. She sounds terrible. How many jabs did she get? She posted this video on Thursday talking about not having health insurance while she was a waitress because it was too expensive. AOC had access to Obamacare for years while she was a waitress. So why didn’t she take advantage of it? As a politician, AOC has strongly defended Obamacare. If Obamacare is so great, why wasn’t she on it when she was a waitress? The answer is AOC has been caught lying again. Either she’s lying about not having health insurance when she was a waitress or she’s lying about Obamacare being great. Both can’t be true. If Obamacare is great, then she lied about not being able to afford health insurance. If Obamacare sucks, then she lied about it being great. Here’s AOC’s new quote about not having health insurance (she says people she worked with didn’t have it either): “It really wasn’t that long ago that I didn’t have any health insurance at all when I was a waitress, and that I couldn’t afford health insurance so I just went without. And, frankly, no one I knew that I worked with had health insurance either because they couldn’t afford it either.” The truth likely is that AOC didn’t have health insurance until around when she got elected to Congress and that’s because Obamacare does suck. Which means the truth also is AOC has been lying to the American people for many years now about Obamacare being great. Now—how many jabs did AOC get and has she been getting boosters? Because she ain’t looking good. (aoc on TT)

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

466,128 views • 3 months ago

When truth is filtered to protect power, transparency dies! Every crucial piece of information in India today seems to be shared only after checking how it will protect the central government. Even after 48 hours of the Delhi blast, there has been no statement from Home Minister Amit Shah or any top official. All that the media has is “source-based” updates—nothing official, no accountability. While Prime Minister Narendra Modi celebrates in Bhutan, questions are being asked about Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi’s whereabouts—but not about national security or government responsibility. As Priyanka Gandhi rightly said in Parliament, during earlier governments, incidents like these were followed by resignations of Chief Ministers and Union Home Ministers. But today, forget resignation—there isn’t even an apology for the Manipur violence, Pahalgam or Pulwama attacks, or now the Delhi blast. If the Home Minister remains silent amid repeated security failures, on what grounds is he called a “strong” Home Minister? Who is he accountable to—the people, or political convenience? Watch the full discussion and analysis in my latest video on Sohit Mishra Official. Link:
1:48

When truth is filtered to protect power, transparency dies! Every crucial piece of information in India today seems to be shared only after checking how it will protect the central government. Even after 48 hours of the Delhi blast, there has been no statement from Home Minister Amit Shah or any top official. All that the media has is “source-based” updates—nothing official, no accountability. While Prime Minister Narendra Modi celebrates in Bhutan, questions are being asked about Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi’s whereabouts—but not about national security or government responsibility. As Priyanka Gandhi rightly said in Parliament, during earlier governments, incidents like these were followed by resignations of Chief Ministers and Union Home Ministers. But today, forget resignation—there isn’t even an apology for the Manipur violence, Pahalgam or Pulwama attacks, or now the Delhi blast. If the Home Minister remains silent amid repeated security failures, on what grounds is he called a “strong” Home Minister? Who is he accountable to—the people, or political convenience? Watch the full discussion and analysis in my latest video on Sohit Mishra Official. Link:

sohit mishra

21,021 views • 8 months ago

Remember when Hank Brennan tried to have a “gotcha!” moment with Dr. Marie Russell, acting as if he knows more than her about dog bites, when he claimed that they’re “routinely referred to as an hourglass shape”? Brennan went so far as to represent that “hourglass” is the industry standard term used to describe the shape of dog bites by experts in an attempt to imply that being unfamiliar with this term suggests one isn’t an expert. ———— Brennan asked: “Well in most professional studies by experts, isn’t it routinely referred to as an hourglass shape?” Dr. Russell replied: “I haven’t seen that at all.” Brennan asked: “Well have you read books on dog bites?” Dr. Russell replied: “I’ve read articles on dog bites.” Brennan asked: “Have you read books on dog bites?” Dr. Russell replied: “No. I have read articles on dog bites.” Brennan asked: “Have you ever read this book (Brennan holds up book)? Do you recognize this as an authority?” Dr. Russell replied: “No.” ———— There’s just one problem for Mr. Brennan. This—the term “hourglass” for describing the shape of dog bites—isn’t a standard known or used industry term, in fact, it isn’t even a term used by experts in the field, nor is it a term used in “professional studies” to describe the shape of dog bites. Unable to find any instances where the term “hourglass” is used in any of the literature, “professional studies”, scientific papers or expert testimony, I decided to consult Hank Brennan’s Dog Bible (I mean book) since he specifically cited to it as being a source that substantiates the supposed established & routine use of this terminology by experts in the field. However, in my quest to determine if this was in fact the case, I scanned through the entirety of Brennan’s “Dog Bites: A Multidisciplinary Perspective” book in order to find what he was referring to. Shockingly, for a term like “hourglass” that Brennan portrayed as being industry nomenclature, or specific verbiage used by experts & in books—particularly Brennan’s book—to describe & expertly qualify the distinct shape of dog bites, this book used the word “hourglass” one time across its 450+ pages. In its singular mention of the word “hourglass”, the book states: “The hourglass shape of a generalized dog bite is clearly different from the typical bow shape of a human bite” (pg. 237). Nowhere in this sentence, page or chapter of the book does it indicate that the word “hourglass” is a widely accepted & used term in the field for describing the shape of dog bites. Based on its singular reference & lack of routine use in this entire book about dog bites, I think it’s safe to say that Hank Brennan is not only wrong, but apparently didn’t read his own reference book—other than perhaps the one page mentioning “hourglass”. ———— Final note on Brennan’s apparent lack of discernment on what constitutes an authoritative source in the field, especially in the areas of science & medicine, and particularly as it relates to expert witness testimony: It’d also appear that Brennan is confusing “professional studies” with peer reviewed studies. This seems to be further reinforced by the fact that he leaned on “books” as a default authority source, when in actuality, it is very well understood both in the medical/scientific community, as well as in the legal world of expert witnesses, that the unequivocally reliable authoritative source is the peer-reviewed study—sometimes referred to as “articles” (aka academic research articles). You probably recall hearing Dr. Russell refer to many such “articles” (peer reviewed studies) throughout the hearing. Peer-reviewed studies, unlike “professional studies”, are academic research articles that undergo rigorous scrutiny by experts in the field (peers) before publication. This process ensures the quality, validity & originality of the research—unlike say a book, for instance, which has no barrier to publication. #KarenReadTrial
0:50

Remember when Hank Brennan tried to have a “gotcha!” moment with Dr. Marie Russell, acting as if he knows more than her about dog bites, when he claimed that they’re “routinely referred to as an hourglass shape”? Brennan went so far as to represent that “hourglass” is the industry standard term used to describe the shape of dog bites by experts in an attempt to imply that being unfamiliar with this term suggests one isn’t an expert. ———— Brennan asked: “Well in most professional studies by experts, isn’t it routinely referred to as an hourglass shape?” Dr. Russell replied: “I haven’t seen that at all.” Brennan asked: “Well have you read books on dog bites?” Dr. Russell replied: “I’ve read articles on dog bites.” Brennan asked: “Have you read books on dog bites?” Dr. Russell replied: “No. I have read articles on dog bites.” Brennan asked: “Have you ever read this book (Brennan holds up book)? Do you recognize this as an authority?” Dr. Russell replied: “No.” ———— There’s just one problem for Mr. Brennan. This—the term “hourglass” for describing the shape of dog bites—isn’t a standard known or used industry term, in fact, it isn’t even a term used by experts in the field, nor is it a term used in “professional studies” to describe the shape of dog bites. Unable to find any instances where the term “hourglass” is used in any of the literature, “professional studies”, scientific papers or expert testimony, I decided to consult Hank Brennan’s Dog Bible (I mean book) since he specifically cited to it as being a source that substantiates the supposed established & routine use of this terminology by experts in the field. However, in my quest to determine if this was in fact the case, I scanned through the entirety of Brennan’s “Dog Bites: A Multidisciplinary Perspective” book in order to find what he was referring to. Shockingly, for a term like “hourglass” that Brennan portrayed as being industry nomenclature, or specific verbiage used by experts & in books—particularly Brennan’s book—to describe & expertly qualify the distinct shape of dog bites, this book used the word “hourglass” one time across its 450+ pages. In its singular mention of the word “hourglass”, the book states: “The hourglass shape of a generalized dog bite is clearly different from the typical bow shape of a human bite” (pg. 237). Nowhere in this sentence, page or chapter of the book does it indicate that the word “hourglass” is a widely accepted & used term in the field for describing the shape of dog bites. Based on its singular reference & lack of routine use in this entire book about dog bites, I think it’s safe to say that Hank Brennan is not only wrong, but apparently didn’t read his own reference book—other than perhaps the one page mentioning “hourglass”. ———— Final note on Brennan’s apparent lack of discernment on what constitutes an authoritative source in the field, especially in the areas of science & medicine, and particularly as it relates to expert witness testimony: It’d also appear that Brennan is confusing “professional studies” with peer reviewed studies. This seems to be further reinforced by the fact that he leaned on “books” as a default authority source, when in actuality, it is very well understood both in the medical/scientific community, as well as in the legal world of expert witnesses, that the unequivocally reliable authoritative source is the peer-reviewed study—sometimes referred to as “articles” (aka academic research articles). You probably recall hearing Dr. Russell refer to many such “articles” (peer reviewed studies) throughout the hearing. Peer-reviewed studies, unlike “professional studies”, are academic research articles that undergo rigorous scrutiny by experts in the field (peers) before publication. This process ensures the quality, validity & originality of the research—unlike say a book, for instance, which has no barrier to publication. #KarenReadTrial

Olivia

31,675 views • 1 year ago

September, 2023. Jake Tapper has on a writer from The Atlantic named Franklin Foer. Foer had just written a "behind the scenes" book about Joe Biden's presidency and his ability to do the job. The Atlantic writer claimed that Biden was still up for the job. Shocker, right? Frank Foer: Biden would pass a mental acuity test. Jake Tapper: "He's sharp physically, I mean mentally. I think the question is physically, right?" Frank Foer:....and it's all subjective... Jake Tapper: "And the guy who is his chief opponent is only three or four years younger than him anyway." This clip is their entire conversation about Biden's fitness. The Tapper quote about Biden being mentally sharp, just not physically, was used in a Grabien supercut. Today, Alex Thompson, Tapper's cowriter on his new book, claimed that it was deceptively edited to be taken out of context. It absolutely was not deceptively edited in any way at all. The entire clip shows that Tapper was arguing that Biden was mentally fit for office and to run for re-election, not that he was questioning Biden's faculties as they now claim. In 2023 Tapper was hawking this guy's book about Biden being up for the job. Now he's promoting his own book about the media's coverup of Biden not being up for the job. It's quite amazing.
2:29

September, 2023. Jake Tapper has on a writer from The Atlantic named Franklin Foer. Foer had just written a "behind the scenes" book about Joe Biden's presidency and his ability to do the job. The Atlantic writer claimed that Biden was still up for the job. Shocker, right? Frank Foer: Biden would pass a mental acuity test. Jake Tapper: "He's sharp physically, I mean mentally. I think the question is physically, right?" Frank Foer:....and it's all subjective... Jake Tapper: "And the guy who is his chief opponent is only three or four years younger than him anyway." This clip is their entire conversation about Biden's fitness. The Tapper quote about Biden being mentally sharp, just not physically, was used in a Grabien supercut. Today, Alex Thompson, Tapper's cowriter on his new book, claimed that it was deceptively edited to be taken out of context. It absolutely was not deceptively edited in any way at all. The entire clip shows that Tapper was arguing that Biden was mentally fit for office and to run for re-election, not that he was questioning Biden's faculties as they now claim. In 2023 Tapper was hawking this guy's book about Biden being up for the job. Now he's promoting his own book about the media's coverup of Biden not being up for the job. It's quite amazing.

MAZE

362,706 views • 1 year ago

New Book Release: Chatuh Shloki Manusmriti: An English Commentary Publisher: Vitasta Publishing Pvt. Ltd Over the past few years, I’ve spent time deeply engaging with the Manusmriti — reading, reflecting, and wrestling with its meaning in today’s world. I’m happy to share that this journey has now taken the shape of a book- "Chatuh Shloki Manusmriti", which is an English Commentary English commentary on the first four verses of the Manusmriti. The book is now available for purchase from Amazon- I am also sharing a video I recorded about the book. Do watch. This book is a personal milestone in my journey as an author. I still remember that the first time I came across Manusmriti or rather the Dharmashastra tradition in a meaningful way was when I was researching for my book 'Menstruation Across Cultures' almost a decade ago. That chance encounter had opened up an entire new avenue of research and reflection in my journey as a Seeker of Sanatana Dharma. The more I spent the time trying to discover and untangle Dharmashastras, the more I realized its extreme importance as a Shabda Pramana which provides the basic building blocks of Hindu Vision of Life, Society, and Universe. The journey is far from over, I believe that I have only taken the baby steps. Nevertheless, this book is a culmination of my journey till date seeking to understand the civilizational, philosophical, and spiritual insights of the Dharmashastra. The first four verses of Manusmriti are not just introductory lines — they carry profound insights into dharma, cosmic order, and the purpose of human life. They embed within themselves the very purpose, object, and goal of Dharma tradition as a whole. My book attempts to highlight and eleborate on all these aspects. The book also focusses on the controversial notion of 'Varna' and clarifies what it truly means in the Dharmashastra texts. Whether you're a seeker, a student of dharma, or simply curious about our traditions — I invite you to read, reflect, and engage with the book. Lastly, I am very thankful for my publisher, Renu Kaul Verma ji and her team for diligently bringing out the book. #Manusmriti #ChatuhShlokiManusmriti #Dharma #SanatanaDharma #Sanskrit #IndianWisdom #BharatiyaParampara #BookRelease #IndianPhilosophy #BookRelease #SanskritCommentary #Hinduism #Hindu #newbook
7:31

New Book Release: Chatuh Shloki Manusmriti: An English Commentary Publisher: Vitasta Publishing Pvt. Ltd Over the past few years, I’ve spent time deeply engaging with the Manusmriti — reading, reflecting, and wrestling with its meaning in today’s world. I’m happy to share that this journey has now taken the shape of a book- "Chatuh Shloki Manusmriti", which is an English Commentary English commentary on the first four verses of the Manusmriti. The book is now available for purchase from Amazon- I am also sharing a video I recorded about the book. Do watch. This book is a personal milestone in my journey as an author. I still remember that the first time I came across Manusmriti or rather the Dharmashastra tradition in a meaningful way was when I was researching for my book 'Menstruation Across Cultures' almost a decade ago. That chance encounter had opened up an entire new avenue of research and reflection in my journey as a Seeker of Sanatana Dharma. The more I spent the time trying to discover and untangle Dharmashastras, the more I realized its extreme importance as a Shabda Pramana which provides the basic building blocks of Hindu Vision of Life, Society, and Universe. The journey is far from over, I believe that I have only taken the baby steps. Nevertheless, this book is a culmination of my journey till date seeking to understand the civilizational, philosophical, and spiritual insights of the Dharmashastra. The first four verses of Manusmriti are not just introductory lines — they carry profound insights into dharma, cosmic order, and the purpose of human life. They embed within themselves the very purpose, object, and goal of Dharma tradition as a whole. My book attempts to highlight and eleborate on all these aspects. The book also focusses on the controversial notion of 'Varna' and clarifies what it truly means in the Dharmashastra texts. Whether you're a seeker, a student of dharma, or simply curious about our traditions — I invite you to read, reflect, and engage with the book. Lastly, I am very thankful for my publisher, Renu Kaul Verma ji and her team for diligently bringing out the book. #Manusmriti #ChatuhShlokiManusmriti #Dharma #SanatanaDharma #Sanskrit #IndianWisdom #BharatiyaParampara #BookRelease #IndianPhilosophy #BookRelease #SanskritCommentary #Hinduism #Hindu #newbook

Nithin Sridhar

24,362 views • 1 year ago

#WATCH | Lok Sabha LoP and Congress MP Rahul Gandhi says, "The story started a few days ago when the issue of the Naravane book came, and the government didn't want me to discuss that at all. So they stalled the House. They didn't let me speak. That happened three or four times. First, they said that I cannot quote a book. Then I said I'm not quoting a book, I'm quoting a magazine. Then they said you cannot quote a magazine. Then I said I'll speak about it. Then they didn't want me to speak about it. The Defence Minister said, falsely, that the book has not been published. In fact, the book has been published and we've got a copy of it also. So that is one big issue. Not allowing the LoP and the entire opposition to speak in the president's address. The second issue is that one of their members spoke, quoting books, multiple books, spoke very vile stuff, and nothing was said. We don't like the fact that they can say whatever they want, whenever they want, and the opposition cannot. The third issue is the suspension of our members. And the final issue, which we are very disturbed about, is this idea that has been floated that members were going to threaten the Prime Minister. There's no question of that. The fact is very clear. The Prime Minister was scared to come to the House, not because of the members, but because of what I was saying. He's still scared because he cannot face the truth. There's no question of our members attacking the Prime Minister. He should have the courage to come. I also mentioned that if somebody said that he's going to attack the Prime Minister, then please do an FIR at once. Arrest that person. Why are you not doing that? So that's basically what's happened..."
3:03

#WATCH | Lok Sabha LoP and Congress MP Rahul Gandhi says, "The story started a few days ago when the issue of the Naravane book came, and the government didn't want me to discuss that at all. So they stalled the House. They didn't let me speak. That happened three or four times. First, they said that I cannot quote a book. Then I said I'm not quoting a book, I'm quoting a magazine. Then they said you cannot quote a magazine. Then I said I'll speak about it. Then they didn't want me to speak about it. The Defence Minister said, falsely, that the book has not been published. In fact, the book has been published and we've got a copy of it also. So that is one big issue. Not allowing the LoP and the entire opposition to speak in the president's address. The second issue is that one of their members spoke, quoting books, multiple books, spoke very vile stuff, and nothing was said. We don't like the fact that they can say whatever they want, whenever they want, and the opposition cannot. The third issue is the suspension of our members. And the final issue, which we are very disturbed about, is this idea that has been floated that members were going to threaten the Prime Minister. There's no question of that. The fact is very clear. The Prime Minister was scared to come to the House, not because of the members, but because of what I was saying. He's still scared because he cannot face the truth. There's no question of our members attacking the Prime Minister. He should have the courage to come. I also mentioned that if somebody said that he's going to attack the Prime Minister, then please do an FIR at once. Arrest that person. Why are you not doing that? So that's basically what's happened..."

ANI

36,449 views • 5 months ago

When I get flak from the left it's *almost always* preceded with "he says his channel is a civil rights channel but..." which simply shows they don't understand civil rights. The 2nd Amendment is a lot of things: a natural right, a Constitutionally protected right, a God given right, and a civil right. It's not a second class right and if you substitute the word "vote" into almost all "gun laws" it become s easily understandable to all Americans that it, indeed, shall not be infringed. Glad to see someone within the DOJ finally acknowledge this. Hopefully legal action, to include arrests followed by perp walks, will be taking place soon as ALL of the proponents of these "gun laws" are in violation of TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242 which "makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. For the purpose of Section 242, acts under "color of law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official's lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim. The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any." #CivilRights #2nd #2A 🎥: GOA & Glenn Beck
1:27

When I get flak from the left it's *almost always* preceded with "he says his channel is a civil rights channel but..." which simply shows they don't understand civil rights. The 2nd Amendment is a lot of things: a natural right, a Constitutionally protected right, a God given right, and a civil right. It's not a second class right and if you substitute the word "vote" into almost all "gun laws" it become s easily understandable to all Americans that it, indeed, shall not be infringed. Glad to see someone within the DOJ finally acknowledge this. Hopefully legal action, to include arrests followed by perp walks, will be taking place soon as ALL of the proponents of these "gun laws" are in violation of TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242 which "makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. For the purpose of Section 242, acts under "color of law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official's lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim. The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any." #CivilRights #2nd #2A 🎥: GOA & Glenn Beck

Mrgunsngear

31,017 views • 1 year ago

Rahul Gandhi has done it AGAIN. The man with the perpetual passport in his pocket has landed in Great Nicobar, posed in front of a few trees, and produced yet another video designed for one purpose only. To sabotage a project of national, strategic and defence importance for India. This is not concern. This is a pattern. Every single project that strengthens India gets the same treatment from this man. Rafale was a scam. Vande Bharat was an insult. Chandrayaan was a stunt. The new Parliament was a coronation. CAA was anti Muslim. Sengol was theatre. Every road, every port, every airport, every defence deal that makes Bharat stronger becomes, in his vocabulary, a “scam” or a “crime.” Whose interests is he actually serving when he travels thousands of kilometres only to demoralise a project that sits at the doorstep of the Strait of Malacca, through which 30 percent of global maritime trade passes? Whose strategy is he advancing when he tries to block India’s answer to China’s String of Pearls, the very port that will end our dependence on Colombo and Singapore for transhipment? Now let us bring out the data Rahul Gandhi will never put in his videos. The total area of Great Nicobar Island is around 910 square kilometres. Out of this, 853 square kilometres, that is 92 percent of the entire island, is constitutionally protected as Tribal Reserve under the 1956 regulation. The project footprint is 166 square kilometres. That is roughly 18 percent of the island, and the tribal reserve remains overwhelmingly intact. The tribal population Rahul Gandhi is suddenly weeping for is approximately 1,200. The Shompen, around 200. The Nicobarese, around 1,000. Eight hundred square kilometres of pristine, protected forest stays exclusively reserved for them. Untouched. Guaranteed by law. And here comes the inconvenient truth that destroys his entire video. The Tribal Council itself has issued a No Objection Certificate to the Government of India. The very communities Rahul Gandhi claims to speak for have already given written consent. The Gram Sabhas have passed resolutions. Yet this man parachutes in from Delhi, ignores the actual voice of the actual tribals on the actual ground, and decides HE will speak for them in English on Twitter for his foreign audience. Why English, Rahul ji? Why is the video tailored for international consumption? Why does every Congress attack on a strategic Indian project get amplified by the exact same Western NGOs and Survival International style outfits that have a track record of stopping infrastructure in developing countries while remaining suspiciously silent about Chinese ports in Hambantota and Gwadar? The pattern is too consistent to be coincidence. When India built Sela Tunnel, he was missing. When China built villages inside Arunachal, he was silent. When Galwan happened, he hugged the Chinese narrative. When Adani built ports for India, he attacked. When Chinese ports encircle India, he says nothing. Great Nicobar is not just an island. It is India’s southernmost frontier, 145 kilometres from Indonesia, sitting on the jugular of world trade. A transhipment port here means crores of dollars stay in India instead of going to Colombo. An airport here means our Navy and Air Force project power into the Indo Pacific. A township here means India finally populates and secures a territory that was nearly lost in 2004. This is exactly why someone, somewhere, wants this project killed. And Rahul Gandhi has volunteered, as always, to be the loudest voice for that someone. 1,200 tribals have said yes. 140 crore Indians want this project. The Supreme Court appointed committee has cleared it. The NGT has cleared it. The Environment Ministry has cleared it. Only one man stands in the way, video camera in hand, lecturing the nation from a forest he visited for the first time in his life. Bharat knows this script by heart now. And Bharat is not buying it anymore.
1:15

Rahul Gandhi has done it AGAIN. The man with the perpetual passport in his pocket has landed in Great Nicobar, posed in front of a few trees, and produced yet another video designed for one purpose only. To sabotage a project of national, strategic and defence importance for India. This is not concern. This is a pattern. Every single project that strengthens India gets the same treatment from this man. Rafale was a scam. Vande Bharat was an insult. Chandrayaan was a stunt. The new Parliament was a coronation. CAA was anti Muslim. Sengol was theatre. Every road, every port, every airport, every defence deal that makes Bharat stronger becomes, in his vocabulary, a “scam” or a “crime.” Whose interests is he actually serving when he travels thousands of kilometres only to demoralise a project that sits at the doorstep of the Strait of Malacca, through which 30 percent of global maritime trade passes? Whose strategy is he advancing when he tries to block India’s answer to China’s String of Pearls, the very port that will end our dependence on Colombo and Singapore for transhipment? Now let us bring out the data Rahul Gandhi will never put in his videos. The total area of Great Nicobar Island is around 910 square kilometres. Out of this, 853 square kilometres, that is 92 percent of the entire island, is constitutionally protected as Tribal Reserve under the 1956 regulation. The project footprint is 166 square kilometres. That is roughly 18 percent of the island, and the tribal reserve remains overwhelmingly intact. The tribal population Rahul Gandhi is suddenly weeping for is approximately 1,200. The Shompen, around 200. The Nicobarese, around 1,000. Eight hundred square kilometres of pristine, protected forest stays exclusively reserved for them. Untouched. Guaranteed by law. And here comes the inconvenient truth that destroys his entire video. The Tribal Council itself has issued a No Objection Certificate to the Government of India. The very communities Rahul Gandhi claims to speak for have already given written consent. The Gram Sabhas have passed resolutions. Yet this man parachutes in from Delhi, ignores the actual voice of the actual tribals on the actual ground, and decides HE will speak for them in English on Twitter for his foreign audience. Why English, Rahul ji? Why is the video tailored for international consumption? Why does every Congress attack on a strategic Indian project get amplified by the exact same Western NGOs and Survival International style outfits that have a track record of stopping infrastructure in developing countries while remaining suspiciously silent about Chinese ports in Hambantota and Gwadar? The pattern is too consistent to be coincidence. When India built Sela Tunnel, he was missing. When China built villages inside Arunachal, he was silent. When Galwan happened, he hugged the Chinese narrative. When Adani built ports for India, he attacked. When Chinese ports encircle India, he says nothing. Great Nicobar is not just an island. It is India’s southernmost frontier, 145 kilometres from Indonesia, sitting on the jugular of world trade. A transhipment port here means crores of dollars stay in India instead of going to Colombo. An airport here means our Navy and Air Force project power into the Indo Pacific. A township here means India finally populates and secures a territory that was nearly lost in 2004. This is exactly why someone, somewhere, wants this project killed. And Rahul Gandhi has volunteered, as always, to be the loudest voice for that someone. 1,200 tribals have said yes. 140 crore Indians want this project. The Supreme Court appointed committee has cleared it. The NGT has cleared it. The Environment Ministry has cleared it. Only one man stands in the way, video camera in hand, lecturing the nation from a forest he visited for the first time in his life. Bharat knows this script by heart now. And Bharat is not buying it anymore.

Oxomiya Jiyori 🇮🇳

17,967 views • 2 months ago

The CEC said House No. 0 is for homeless people. But we do our homework. So we decided to check everything he says. And when we checked the address, it wasn't for a homeless person. There is a Mr. Narendra who supposedly lives in that house. We understood why the House was numbered 0. Because when we sent someone to look for him, it was impossible to find him. Rather, we physically identified this man in a village. The reason there is House No. 0 is that nobody can identify where that person is. Once he has voted, he is gone. This man is one of the hundreds of examples that we have. The CEC is lying to the people of India openly. This is a method to make voter and address verification difficult. It's not a mistake. It's not about homeless people. Another one: the BJP Vice Chairman of Zila Parishad, Palwal, who lives in House No. 150, and he has 66 voters living in his house. Now, let's go to House No. 265, where 501 voters live. And when you look for them, you can't find them there. Why? So that you can't check whether these people exist or where or how they vote. Another example is House No. 1904, which the list says has 108 voters. But that's not true. There is a rule: if there is a house where there are 10 people living in it, then there has to be a ground verification. That's an EC rule. But was any verification done? Clearly no! : LoP Shri Rahul Gandhi 📍 Delhi
4:32

The CEC said House No. 0 is for homeless people. But we do our homework. So we decided to check everything he says. And when we checked the address, it wasn't for a homeless person. There is a Mr. Narendra who supposedly lives in that house. We understood why the House was numbered 0. Because when we sent someone to look for him, it was impossible to find him. Rather, we physically identified this man in a village. The reason there is House No. 0 is that nobody can identify where that person is. Once he has voted, he is gone. This man is one of the hundreds of examples that we have. The CEC is lying to the people of India openly. This is a method to make voter and address verification difficult. It's not a mistake. It's not about homeless people. Another one: the BJP Vice Chairman of Zila Parishad, Palwal, who lives in House No. 150, and he has 66 voters living in his house. Now, let's go to House No. 265, where 501 voters live. And when you look for them, you can't find them there. Why? So that you can't check whether these people exist or where or how they vote. Another example is House No. 1904, which the list says has 108 voters. But that's not true. There is a rule: if there is a house where there are 10 people living in it, then there has to be a ground verification. That's an EC rule. But was any verification done? Clearly no! : LoP Shri Rahul Gandhi 📍 Delhi

Congress

65,826 views • 8 months ago

A LIAR thinks he's smart but always leaves traces behind & Rahul Ghandy is No Exception. Now SPREADING LIES 'CONgress' votes were deleted in Karnataka. NOW I NEED UR HELP TO SAVE DEMOCRACY🙏 Pls READ FULL PROCESS OF DELETION OF NAME FROM VOTER LIST👇 & SPREAD MAX! Process of DELETION of Name from Voters List- 1. File Application: Submit Form 7 (for deletion of name) to Electoral Registration Officer (ERO) or online via National Voters' Service Portal (NVSP). 2. Provide Details: Include voter’s name, address, EPIC number (if available), and reason for deletion (e.g., death, shifted residence, duplicate entry). 3. Attach Documents: Provide supporting documents like death certificate (for deceased), proof of new residence, or ID for verification. 4. Verification: ERO verifies the application through field inquiry or document check. 5. Field Enquiry: ERO conducts a field inquiry to verify details for voter name deletion (e.g., confirming death, residence change, or duplicate entry). 6. BLO's Role: The Booth Level Officer (BLO) typically carries out the field enquiry on behalf of the ERO, visiting the voter’s address or collecting necessary information. 7. ERO's Decision: The BLO submits findings to the ERO, who then makes the final decision on the deletion. SO, the BLO HANDLES GROUND LEVEL VERIFICATION DURING the FIELD ENQUIRY, but the ERO oversees the process and approves/rejects the application. 8. Objection Period: Public notice is issued, allowing objections (usually 7 days). 9. Final Decision : ERO approves or rejects the deletion after verification and objection period. 10. Update Electoral Roll: If approved, the voter’s name is removed from the electoral roll. 11. Notification: Applicant is informed of the decision (via SMS/email if applied online). NOTE- OTP is involved ONLY for filling form!! MERELY FILLING A FORM DOESN’T MEAN THAT NAME WILL BE DELETED, IT WILL ONLY BE DELETED AFTER BLO's FIELD VISIT AND GIVING THE PERSON AGAINST WHOSE NAME APPLICATION IS FILLED A FAIR HEARING. So even if it's ASSUMED that Rahul Ghandy is speaking truth about CONSPIRACY to delete CONgress Voters....IT'S PRACTICALLY IMPOSSIBLE WITHOUT GOING THROUGH THIS RIGOURS PROCESS. Bharat's democracy is safe. Only SOME FAILED people want to endanger it by spreading Anarchy TO HIDE their FAILURES. Maybe, it's the only way left for them to SAVE their EXISTENCE. Pls RT & spread Max. Let people know the TRUTH!
1:15

A LIAR thinks he's smart but always leaves traces behind & Rahul Ghandy is No Exception. Now SPREADING LIES 'CONgress' votes were deleted in Karnataka. NOW I NEED UR HELP TO SAVE DEMOCRACY🙏 Pls READ FULL PROCESS OF DELETION OF NAME FROM VOTER LIST👇 & SPREAD MAX! Process of DELETION of Name from Voters List- 1. File Application: Submit Form 7 (for deletion of name) to Electoral Registration Officer (ERO) or online via National Voters' Service Portal (NVSP). 2. Provide Details: Include voter’s name, address, EPIC number (if available), and reason for deletion (e.g., death, shifted residence, duplicate entry). 3. Attach Documents: Provide supporting documents like death certificate (for deceased), proof of new residence, or ID for verification. 4. Verification: ERO verifies the application through field inquiry or document check. 5. Field Enquiry: ERO conducts a field inquiry to verify details for voter name deletion (e.g., confirming death, residence change, or duplicate entry). 6. BLO's Role: The Booth Level Officer (BLO) typically carries out the field enquiry on behalf of the ERO, visiting the voter’s address or collecting necessary information. 7. ERO's Decision: The BLO submits findings to the ERO, who then makes the final decision on the deletion. SO, the BLO HANDLES GROUND LEVEL VERIFICATION DURING the FIELD ENQUIRY, but the ERO oversees the process and approves/rejects the application. 8. Objection Period: Public notice is issued, allowing objections (usually 7 days). 9. Final Decision : ERO approves or rejects the deletion after verification and objection period. 10. Update Electoral Roll: If approved, the voter’s name is removed from the electoral roll. 11. Notification: Applicant is informed of the decision (via SMS/email if applied online). NOTE- OTP is involved ONLY for filling form!! MERELY FILLING A FORM DOESN’T MEAN THAT NAME WILL BE DELETED, IT WILL ONLY BE DELETED AFTER BLO's FIELD VISIT AND GIVING THE PERSON AGAINST WHOSE NAME APPLICATION IS FILLED A FAIR HEARING. So even if it's ASSUMED that Rahul Ghandy is speaking truth about CONSPIRACY to delete CONgress Voters....IT'S PRACTICALLY IMPOSSIBLE WITHOUT GOING THROUGH THIS RIGOURS PROCESS. Bharat's democracy is safe. Only SOME FAILED people want to endanger it by spreading Anarchy TO HIDE their FAILURES. Maybe, it's the only way left for them to SAVE their EXISTENCE. Pls RT & spread Max. Let people know the TRUTH!

BhikuMhatre

37,384 views • 10 months ago