Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🚨 THIS SHOULD HAVE STOPPED. IT DIDN’T. 🚨 Why would DNA still circulate in someone’s bloodstream months — even years — after vaccination? In this clip, researchers and clinicians discuss disturbing findings: 🧬 DNA detected in vaccine vials 🩸 DNA reportedly circulating in blood long after injection ⏳ Spike...

RenzTom's profile picture

Tom Renz

360,117 subscribers

26,235 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨🚨🚨🚨 Oh-oh! First experiments of genetic vaccines getting absorbed by human cells completed - Prof Sucharit Bhakdi reveals. ----------------------------- Our two lady scientists who are just brilliant, they took cells, human cells, and immersed these cells in the vaccine and they found, and these are the first experiments that have ever been done, okay, that the human cells immediately took up the vaccines and the DNA and the chromosomes, and the chromosomes, bacterial chromosomes, entered the cells and these cells immediately started making the spike protein in horrendous quantity and they have quantified this, they have shown what happens to the spike protein, that it is stable, that it is shed into the blood, into the circulation, they have shown that they can measure this in the blood, they can measure this anywhere actually, and they have shown that the plasmid and the spike production goes on for many, many days. So, what did our girls do? They sent their human cells that had been transfected to Kevin McKernan, begging the question, Kevin, can you find any chromosomal integration of bacterial DNA in the human cell chromosomes? Do you know the answer? He put it up in his substack one week ago, and the answer is yes. He's found it. ------------------------------------- Kevin McKernan
5:27

🚨🚨🚨🚨 Oh-oh! First experiments of genetic vaccines getting absorbed by human cells completed - Prof Sucharit Bhakdi reveals. ----------------------------- Our two lady scientists who are just brilliant, they took cells, human cells, and immersed these cells in the vaccine and they found, and these are the first experiments that have ever been done, okay, that the human cells immediately took up the vaccines and the DNA and the chromosomes, and the chromosomes, bacterial chromosomes, entered the cells and these cells immediately started making the spike protein in horrendous quantity and they have quantified this, they have shown what happens to the spike protein, that it is stable, that it is shed into the blood, into the circulation, they have shown that they can measure this in the blood, they can measure this anywhere actually, and they have shown that the plasmid and the spike production goes on for many, many days. So, what did our girls do? They sent their human cells that had been transfected to Kevin McKernan, begging the question, Kevin, can you find any chromosomal integration of bacterial DNA in the human cell chromosomes? Do you know the answer? He put it up in his substack one week ago, and the answer is yes. He's found it. ------------------------------------- Kevin McKernan

aussie17

333,911 просмотров • 2 лет назад

"There's absolutely no question that this was not an accident...the fact that we have one-third DNA product and two-thirds RNA product [in the C19 jabs] is, for whatever reason, the ratio that the makers wanted it to be. They have lied to us in the extreme." Canadian Comprehensive Physician Dr. Chris Shoemaker (@CShoemakerMD) describes for the RAIR Foundation (RAIR Foundation USA) how the DNA contamination of the COVID injections "was not an accident." Shoemaker notes that "They have lied to us in the extreme" and "We are in danger in the extreme, not just in the short term." "There's absolutely no question that this was not an accident. There's absolutely no question that it was carefully and scientifically accomplished," Shoemaker says. "And the fact that we have one-third DNA product and two-thirds RNA product is, for whatever reason, the ratio that the makers wanted it to be." "What's the difference [if there is] DNA is in [the jabs] instead of just mRNA? The difference is that...the DNA, functionally, once in the nucleus, can influence the nucleus, [and] can produce mRNA near the nucleus and have that mRNA migrate out into the cytoplasm of the cell," Shoemaker says. "And once that's done, what should be, at worst, an 8-month process inside your body is, in fact, an 8- to 10-year process inside your body because of the nefarious decision to allow DNA in these shots." Partial transcription of clip: "There's absolutely no question that this was not an accident. There's absolutely no question that it was carefully and scientifically accomplished. And the fact that we have one-third DNA product and two-thirds RNA product is, for whatever reason, the ratio that the makers wanted it to be. They have lied to us in the extreme. "We are in danger in the extreme, not just in the short term. We know the 2 percent, 3 percent of people who passed away suddenly and surprisingly and that's way more than should happen. But the long term effect on the ability to fight cancer or for a cancer to perhaps be a turbo cancer, all these are being influenced by both DNA and RNA that is within us. "The key thing is that it makes the whole process last longer. If it was only mRNA, it would probably be 8 to 12 months only that mRNA would seed out into your body and be repeatedly creating spike, repeatedly creating spike. Remember, the end-product is the most dangerous part of this human engineered genome. The spike protein is the thing that congeals blood cells against each other. The spike protein is the thing that, if it's in your liver, is waving a flag saying, Hey, I'm not your liver. I'm not a human liver. I've got this strange created spike protein. You can identify that I'm not your liver, and you can attack it, and you can make hepatitis for this person because it's not even their liver. "This is what mRNA does is create a flag so that you're attacking through your healthy immune system. Your healthy immune system is going after it in organ after organ after organ. For some people, it's just a specific organ that was already a bit weak to begin with. And for other people, it's a different organ. But either way, mRNA produces a spike flag, which your immune system attacks. "To return to your question about DNA, what's the difference that DNA is in there instead of just mRNA? The difference is that the DNA can, for years, not just 8 to 12 months. The DNA, functionally, once in the nucleus, can influence the nucleus, can produce mRNA near the nucleus and have that mRNA migrate out into the cytoplasm of the cell. And once that's done, what should be, at worst, an 8-month process inside your body is, in fact, an 8 to 10 year process inside your body because of the nefarious decision to allow DNA in these shots."
3:14

"There's absolutely no question that this was not an accident...the fact that we have one-third DNA product and two-thirds RNA product [in the C19 jabs] is, for whatever reason, the ratio that the makers wanted it to be. They have lied to us in the extreme." Canadian Comprehensive Physician Dr. Chris Shoemaker (@CShoemakerMD) describes for the RAIR Foundation (RAIR Foundation USA) how the DNA contamination of the COVID injections "was not an accident." Shoemaker notes that "They have lied to us in the extreme" and "We are in danger in the extreme, not just in the short term." "There's absolutely no question that this was not an accident. There's absolutely no question that it was carefully and scientifically accomplished," Shoemaker says. "And the fact that we have one-third DNA product and two-thirds RNA product is, for whatever reason, the ratio that the makers wanted it to be." "What's the difference [if there is] DNA is in [the jabs] instead of just mRNA? The difference is that...the DNA, functionally, once in the nucleus, can influence the nucleus, [and] can produce mRNA near the nucleus and have that mRNA migrate out into the cytoplasm of the cell," Shoemaker says. "And once that's done, what should be, at worst, an 8-month process inside your body is, in fact, an 8- to 10-year process inside your body because of the nefarious decision to allow DNA in these shots." Partial transcription of clip: "There's absolutely no question that this was not an accident. There's absolutely no question that it was carefully and scientifically accomplished. And the fact that we have one-third DNA product and two-thirds RNA product is, for whatever reason, the ratio that the makers wanted it to be. They have lied to us in the extreme. "We are in danger in the extreme, not just in the short term. We know the 2 percent, 3 percent of people who passed away suddenly and surprisingly and that's way more than should happen. But the long term effect on the ability to fight cancer or for a cancer to perhaps be a turbo cancer, all these are being influenced by both DNA and RNA that is within us. "The key thing is that it makes the whole process last longer. If it was only mRNA, it would probably be 8 to 12 months only that mRNA would seed out into your body and be repeatedly creating spike, repeatedly creating spike. Remember, the end-product is the most dangerous part of this human engineered genome. The spike protein is the thing that congeals blood cells against each other. The spike protein is the thing that, if it's in your liver, is waving a flag saying, Hey, I'm not your liver. I'm not a human liver. I've got this strange created spike protein. You can identify that I'm not your liver, and you can attack it, and you can make hepatitis for this person because it's not even their liver. "This is what mRNA does is create a flag so that you're attacking through your healthy immune system. Your healthy immune system is going after it in organ after organ after organ. For some people, it's just a specific organ that was already a bit weak to begin with. And for other people, it's a different organ. But either way, mRNA produces a spike flag, which your immune system attacks. "To return to your question about DNA, what's the difference that DNA is in there instead of just mRNA? The difference is that the DNA can, for years, not just 8 to 12 months. The DNA, functionally, once in the nucleus, can influence the nucleus, can produce mRNA near the nucleus and have that mRNA migrate out into the cytoplasm of the cell. And once that's done, what should be, at worst, an 8-month process inside your body is, in fact, an 8 to 10 year process inside your body because of the nefarious decision to allow DNA in these shots."

Sense Receptor

95,273 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨🚨Some of you have been asking questions about the DNA 🧬 videos I’ve been posting about the 144 000 and how the #Covid #Vaccine adds another strand of 72 000, to make it a total of 216 000 Here is a great explanation, watch this👇 Again, if you just woke up to all the craziness around you, this is probably not a good video to watch, so please ignore this
3:00

🚨🚨Some of you have been asking questions about the DNA 🧬 videos I’ve been posting about the 144 000 and how the #Covid #Vaccine adds another strand of 72 000, to make it a total of 216 000 Here is a great explanation, watch this👇 Again, if you just woke up to all the craziness around you, this is probably not a good video to watch, so please ignore this

Kevin - WE THE PEOPLE🦁

55,827 просмотров • 3 лет назад

🚨🚨 EPIC Paul Offit takedown! PLEASE LIKE AND SHARE WIDELY! A point by point analysis of the false claims and lies he presented as scientific fact in his infamous 2024 "DNA fragments in COVID vaccines are completely harmless" video: LIE #1: The mRNA vaccines contain fragments of DNA, but these are in very small quantities, measured in nanograms - Counterargument: Even though the DNA fragments may be in small quantities, their presence still poses a risk. DNA integration into the genome, even in small quantities, could still have long-term, unpredictable effects that we are not yet fully aware of. LIE #2: Impossibility of DNA entering human DNA: For these DNA fragments to integrate into our DNA, they would have to overcome several barriers, including crossing the cytoplasm and nuclear membrane, which is virtually impossible - Counterargument: The entire purpose of the LNP (lipid nanoparticle) in mRNA vaccines is to allow for the mRNA to enter the cytoplasm in order to transcribe the desired proteins. While fragments integrating into human DNA might be low, it's not "impossible." Scientific literature on gene editing technologies, like CRISPR, demonstrates that foreign DNA can be integrated into the genome under certain conditions. LIE #3: Role of innate immune system in rejecting foreign DNA: The innate immune system and enzymes in the cytoplasm work to destroy foreign DNA - Counterargument: While our immune system does recognize and destroy some foreign DNA, the immune response isn't perfect, especially if the foreign DNA is introduced in a manner that is not immediately recognized such as via the LNP. In certain environments or under specific conditions, foreign DNA can evade immune detection. LIE #4: Lack of integrases in mRNA vaccine DNA: The DNA fragments in the mRNA vaccine do not have the necessary integrases to integrate into our genome - Counterargument: While the fragments might lack integrases, it's possible that they could still interact with the genome in other ways, for example, through epigenetic changes or by influencing gene expression as is commonly achieved in laboratory settings. LIE #5: Comparison to naturally occurring foreign DNA: We are constantly exposed to foreign DNA through our food from bacteria, plants, and animals, which is much larger and more abundant than the DNA in vaccines - Counterargument: Although we are exposed to foreign DNA regularly through the digestive tract, the introduction of DNA through vaccination is a more controlled and concentrated process. The body is not naturally prepared to deal with such DNA in the same way it handles the ingestion of plant or animal DNA. LIE #6: Fear-mongering accusation: The physician scientist who raised these concerns was just scaring people unnecessarily - Counterargument: Raising concerns about potential risks is an important part of scientific discourse, especially when it comes to public health. It's better to err on the side of caution and investigate these possibilities rather than dismissing concerns outright, especially when the long-term effects of mRNA vaccines are still being studied. LIE #7: Assurance that these risks are negligible: The DNA fragments from the vaccines are clinically harmless - Counterargument: The assertion that these fragments are harmless is premature. Without long-term studies specifically addressing the potential risks of vaccine-derived DNA integration, it's impossible to claim with certainty that there will be no adverse effects in the future. Paul Offit knows all of this, so WHY IS HE LYING TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC? Please share this important video with everyone you know and DEMAND TRANSPARENT RESEARCH INTO THE QUESTION OF DNA CONTAMINATION AND INTEGRATION IN THE #COVID #vaccinated POPULATION! @P_J_Buckhaults Kevin McKernan Danny Jones Bret Weinstein Vejon Health - Dr Philip McMillan John Campbell Robert F. Kennedy Jr Steve Kirsch #AwfulOffit
12:57

🚨🚨 EPIC Paul Offit takedown! PLEASE LIKE AND SHARE WIDELY! A point by point analysis of the false claims and lies he presented as scientific fact in his infamous 2024 "DNA fragments in COVID vaccines are completely harmless" video: LIE #1: The mRNA vaccines contain fragments of DNA, but these are in very small quantities, measured in nanograms - Counterargument: Even though the DNA fragments may be in small quantities, their presence still poses a risk. DNA integration into the genome, even in small quantities, could still have long-term, unpredictable effects that we are not yet fully aware of. LIE #2: Impossibility of DNA entering human DNA: For these DNA fragments to integrate into our DNA, they would have to overcome several barriers, including crossing the cytoplasm and nuclear membrane, which is virtually impossible - Counterargument: The entire purpose of the LNP (lipid nanoparticle) in mRNA vaccines is to allow for the mRNA to enter the cytoplasm in order to transcribe the desired proteins. While fragments integrating into human DNA might be low, it's not "impossible." Scientific literature on gene editing technologies, like CRISPR, demonstrates that foreign DNA can be integrated into the genome under certain conditions. LIE #3: Role of innate immune system in rejecting foreign DNA: The innate immune system and enzymes in the cytoplasm work to destroy foreign DNA - Counterargument: While our immune system does recognize and destroy some foreign DNA, the immune response isn't perfect, especially if the foreign DNA is introduced in a manner that is not immediately recognized such as via the LNP. In certain environments or under specific conditions, foreign DNA can evade immune detection. LIE #4: Lack of integrases in mRNA vaccine DNA: The DNA fragments in the mRNA vaccine do not have the necessary integrases to integrate into our genome - Counterargument: While the fragments might lack integrases, it's possible that they could still interact with the genome in other ways, for example, through epigenetic changes or by influencing gene expression as is commonly achieved in laboratory settings. LIE #5: Comparison to naturally occurring foreign DNA: We are constantly exposed to foreign DNA through our food from bacteria, plants, and animals, which is much larger and more abundant than the DNA in vaccines - Counterargument: Although we are exposed to foreign DNA regularly through the digestive tract, the introduction of DNA through vaccination is a more controlled and concentrated process. The body is not naturally prepared to deal with such DNA in the same way it handles the ingestion of plant or animal DNA. LIE #6: Fear-mongering accusation: The physician scientist who raised these concerns was just scaring people unnecessarily - Counterargument: Raising concerns about potential risks is an important part of scientific discourse, especially when it comes to public health. It's better to err on the side of caution and investigate these possibilities rather than dismissing concerns outright, especially when the long-term effects of mRNA vaccines are still being studied. LIE #7: Assurance that these risks are negligible: The DNA fragments from the vaccines are clinically harmless - Counterargument: The assertion that these fragments are harmless is premature. Without long-term studies specifically addressing the potential risks of vaccine-derived DNA integration, it's impossible to claim with certainty that there will be no adverse effects in the future. Paul Offit knows all of this, so WHY IS HE LYING TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC? Please share this important video with everyone you know and DEMAND TRANSPARENT RESEARCH INTO THE QUESTION OF DNA CONTAMINATION AND INTEGRATION IN THE #COVID #vaccinated POPULATION! @P_J_Buckhaults Kevin McKernan Danny Jones Bret Weinstein Vejon Health - Dr Philip McMillan John Campbell Robert F. Kennedy Jr Steve Kirsch #AwfulOffit

Vaccine Safety Research Foundation

338,876 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 BRET WEINSTEIN ON JOE ROGAN: “This is clear fraud.” In one of the most explosive exchanges yet on the Joe Rogan Experience, evolutionary biologist Bret Weinstein laid bare what he calls “the greatest medical scandal in modern history.” Weinstein didn’t hold back: “Taking the mRNA COVID shots off the market should have been an easy decision. They should be embarrassed — horrified — by the harm they caused.” Then came the bombshell: “The product that was actually injected into billions of people involved DNA plasmids — and there is massive contamination in the shots, including the SV40 promoter — a known carcinogenic element.” He explained that what was tested was not what was injected: “For you to put one product through safety testing, and then inject people with something different — that’s fraud.” The SV40 promoter, originally from simian virus 40, was discovered in leftover vaccine vials by independent scientist Kevin McKernan, and Weinstein warned it could enable genetic integration inside human cells. “We were told there’s no DNA — that integration was impossible. That was a lie. There is DNA, and not just any DNA — but DNA with a carcinogenic promoter.” If proven true, this would mean safety testing was bypassed, regulators were misled, and the immunity from liability collapses. “The immunity from liability is dependent on there having been no fraud,” Weinstein said. “And there clearly was fraud.” This isn’t just about science anymore. It’s about truth, accountability, and justice for billions who were never told the full story.
5:09

🚨 BRET WEINSTEIN ON JOE ROGAN: “This is clear fraud.” In one of the most explosive exchanges yet on the Joe Rogan Experience, evolutionary biologist Bret Weinstein laid bare what he calls “the greatest medical scandal in modern history.” Weinstein didn’t hold back: “Taking the mRNA COVID shots off the market should have been an easy decision. They should be embarrassed — horrified — by the harm they caused.” Then came the bombshell: “The product that was actually injected into billions of people involved DNA plasmids — and there is massive contamination in the shots, including the SV40 promoter — a known carcinogenic element.” He explained that what was tested was not what was injected: “For you to put one product through safety testing, and then inject people with something different — that’s fraud.” The SV40 promoter, originally from simian virus 40, was discovered in leftover vaccine vials by independent scientist Kevin McKernan, and Weinstein warned it could enable genetic integration inside human cells. “We were told there’s no DNA — that integration was impossible. That was a lie. There is DNA, and not just any DNA — but DNA with a carcinogenic promoter.” If proven true, this would mean safety testing was bypassed, regulators were misled, and the immunity from liability collapses. “The immunity from liability is dependent on there having been no fraud,” Weinstein said. “And there clearly was fraud.” This isn’t just about science anymore. It’s about truth, accountability, and justice for billions who were never told the full story.

Jim Ferguson

1,822,838 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

This is Anagha Rajesh. And she is crazy. She wants to store data in bacterial DNA. Her startup is called BioCompute. And last year, they actually did it. They stored data in DNA and retrieved it in their tiny lab in Bengaluru. This is a huge moment. But why is she even doing it? Because DNA is the ultimate storage tool available to us. Just 1 gm of DNA can store about 215 petabytes of data - that's like storing over 2 million movies in 4K. On top of that - this data can last for literally 1000s of years. Right now, they still need to figure out a way to make the reading and writing process faster and cheaper. But if BioCompute solves this problem - we could theoretically store all the data created in the world every year in the palm of our hands. And that would be insane. P.S. Check out this video from vyom going to Anagha's lab and actually doing it.
0:21

This is Anagha Rajesh. And she is crazy. She wants to store data in bacterial DNA. Her startup is called BioCompute. And last year, they actually did it. They stored data in DNA and retrieved it in their tiny lab in Bengaluru. This is a huge moment. But why is she even doing it? Because DNA is the ultimate storage tool available to us. Just 1 gm of DNA can store about 215 petabytes of data - that's like storing over 2 million movies in 4K. On top of that - this data can last for literally 1000s of years. Right now, they still need to figure out a way to make the reading and writing process faster and cheaper. But if BioCompute solves this problem - we could theoretically store all the data created in the world every year in the palm of our hands. And that would be insane. P.S. Check out this video from vyom going to Anagha's lab and actually doing it.

Varun Guru

253,216 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Dr. Paul Marik: Persistent Spike Protein After COVID Vaccination Lasts FAR Longer Than Claimed! Dr. Paul Marik, a renowned critical care expert, has dropped a bombshell about the long-term effects of COVID vaccines. Contrary to claims that the vaccine stays in the arm and dissipates within days, Marik cites compelling evidence showing persistent spike protein circulating in the body for astonishing durations—potentially forever in some individuals. A recent Yale study examined this phenomenon, finding patients with detectable spike protein in their monocytes for over 700 days post-vaccination. Even more staggering, one patient—excluded from the study for undisclosed reasons—had circulating spike protein for 1,400 days. That’s nearly four years of this foreign protein lingering in the body, contributing to severe vaccine injuries with no clear method to eliminate it. Marik emphasizes that this is not replicating virus but rather spike protein produced by the vaccine, which was falsely claimed to remain localized and short-lived. Instead, it distributes throughout the body, and for a segment of the population, it may never clear. This raises urgent questions about long-term health impacts and the lack of solutions for those suffering. The narrative that vaccines are fleeting and harmless has been shattered. The public deserves transparency about these risks and answers about how to address this alarming persistence of spike protein.
1:35

Dr. Paul Marik: Persistent Spike Protein After COVID Vaccination Lasts FAR Longer Than Claimed! Dr. Paul Marik, a renowned critical care expert, has dropped a bombshell about the long-term effects of COVID vaccines. Contrary to claims that the vaccine stays in the arm and dissipates within days, Marik cites compelling evidence showing persistent spike protein circulating in the body for astonishing durations—potentially forever in some individuals. A recent Yale study examined this phenomenon, finding patients with detectable spike protein in their monocytes for over 700 days post-vaccination. Even more staggering, one patient—excluded from the study for undisclosed reasons—had circulating spike protein for 1,400 days. That’s nearly four years of this foreign protein lingering in the body, contributing to severe vaccine injuries with no clear method to eliminate it. Marik emphasizes that this is not replicating virus but rather spike protein produced by the vaccine, which was falsely claimed to remain localized and short-lived. Instead, it distributes throughout the body, and for a segment of the population, it may never clear. This raises urgent questions about long-term health impacts and the lack of solutions for those suffering. The narrative that vaccines are fleeting and harmless has been shattered. The public deserves transparency about these risks and answers about how to address this alarming persistence of spike protein.

Camus

57,890 просмотров • 1 год назад

Pfizer Spike Protein Was Still Circulating in a Patient's Blood 3.6 Years After His Last Shot. Now Published in a Peer-Reviewed Journal. Three doses of Pfizer. The spike protein — still in the bloodstream 3.6 years later. Still producing. Still causing damage. The best approaches to clear it: sweating through sauna and exercise, and high-dose nattokinase and bromelain — two naturally occurring enzymes shown in the literature to break down the spike protein. The body cannot clear it on its own. That is the clinical reality that no public health agency has acknowledged. Join the Fight: Courtesy of Focus FM 103.6 Focus FM 103.6 , Stefanos Damianidis Stefanos Damianidis #MedicalFreedom
1:10

Pfizer Spike Protein Was Still Circulating in a Patient's Blood 3.6 Years After His Last Shot. Now Published in a Peer-Reviewed Journal. Three doses of Pfizer. The spike protein — still in the bloodstream 3.6 years later. Still producing. Still causing damage. The best approaches to clear it: sweating through sauna and exercise, and high-dose nattokinase and bromelain — two naturally occurring enzymes shown in the literature to break down the spike protein. The body cannot clear it on its own. That is the clinical reality that no public health agency has acknowledged. Join the Fight: Courtesy of Focus FM 103.6 Focus FM 103.6 , Stefanos Damianidis Stefanos Damianidis #MedicalFreedom

McCullough Foundation

93,648 просмотров • 11 дней назад

Our new study indicates that mRNA injections may never leave the human body in some individuals. Governments and corporations made blatantly false claims that mRNA would degrade within days to weeks. Now, in the most comprehensive COVID-19 "vaccine" injury case study to date, mRNA, plasmid DNA, and spike protein were repeatedly detected more than 3.5 years after the final injection — following >40 ER visits, >200 specialist encounters, >100 laboratory investigations, >100 imaging studies, and multi-laboratory molecular confirmation across blood and tissue. Legal accountability is inevitable after billions worldwide were lied to.
0:55

Our new study indicates that mRNA injections may never leave the human body in some individuals. Governments and corporations made blatantly false claims that mRNA would degrade within days to weeks. Now, in the most comprehensive COVID-19 "vaccine" injury case study to date, mRNA, plasmid DNA, and spike protein were repeatedly detected more than 3.5 years after the final injection — following >40 ER visits, >200 specialist encounters, >100 laboratory investigations, >100 imaging studies, and multi-laboratory molecular confirmation across blood and tissue. Legal accountability is inevitable after billions worldwide were lied to.

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

119,868 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

A bombshell scientific publication confirms a critical danger in the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, and the implications are as severe as they are alarming. The core issue is plasmid DNA contamination. New research confirms this contaminating DNA is not just present in the vial; it is capable of entering human cells. This fact alone is concerning, but the true danger lies in what this DNA contains. Scientists have identified the presence of an SV40 viral promoter/enhancer sequence within Pfizer's plasmid DNA. For decades, SV40 has been known to be a potent tool for driving gene expression and is associated with potential genomic integration risks. Here is why this is a catastrophic failure in regulatory disclosure and vaccine design: 1. Nuclear Entry & Genomic Integration: The SV40 promoter is functionally active in human cells. Its presence means the contaminating plasmid DNA has a non-zero chance of entering the nucleus of a human cell. Once inside the nucleus, it runs a tangible risk of integrating into the human genome. 2. Uncontrolled, Long-Term Gene Expression: If integration occurs, it could effectively turn the vaccine into an unintended and uncontrolled gene therapy. This could force the body to produce the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein indefinitely—for months, years, or permanently, with unknown health consequences. 3. A Deliberate Omission? Most damningly, Pfizer never disclosed the presence of this known biohazard, the SV40 sequence, to regulatory bodies during the approval process. There was no functional reason for its inclusion, as Moderna's production process utilized a standard bacterial plasmid without such dangerous components. The authors of this pivotal study are now calling for the immediate suspension of these mRNA vaccines until a full understanding of their long-term genomic risks is achieved. They further state that Pfizer and BioNTech must be held accountable for exposing the global population to a risk this significant without informed consent. This is no longer speculation. This is published, peer-reviewed science confirming a pathway for potential permanent alteration of the human genome. The demand for transparency and accountability has never been more urgent.
3:00

A bombshell scientific publication confirms a critical danger in the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, and the implications are as severe as they are alarming. The core issue is plasmid DNA contamination. New research confirms this contaminating DNA is not just present in the vial; it is capable of entering human cells. This fact alone is concerning, but the true danger lies in what this DNA contains. Scientists have identified the presence of an SV40 viral promoter/enhancer sequence within Pfizer's plasmid DNA. For decades, SV40 has been known to be a potent tool for driving gene expression and is associated with potential genomic integration risks. Here is why this is a catastrophic failure in regulatory disclosure and vaccine design: 1. Nuclear Entry & Genomic Integration: The SV40 promoter is functionally active in human cells. Its presence means the contaminating plasmid DNA has a non-zero chance of entering the nucleus of a human cell. Once inside the nucleus, it runs a tangible risk of integrating into the human genome. 2. Uncontrolled, Long-Term Gene Expression: If integration occurs, it could effectively turn the vaccine into an unintended and uncontrolled gene therapy. This could force the body to produce the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein indefinitely—for months, years, or permanently, with unknown health consequences. 3. A Deliberate Omission? Most damningly, Pfizer never disclosed the presence of this known biohazard, the SV40 sequence, to regulatory bodies during the approval process. There was no functional reason for its inclusion, as Moderna's production process utilized a standard bacterial plasmid without such dangerous components. The authors of this pivotal study are now calling for the immediate suspension of these mRNA vaccines until a full understanding of their long-term genomic risks is achieved. They further state that Pfizer and BioNTech must be held accountable for exposing the global population to a risk this significant without informed consent. This is no longer speculation. This is published, peer-reviewed science confirming a pathway for potential permanent alteration of the human genome. The demand for transparency and accountability has never been more urgent.

Camus

205,889 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

🚨 Dr. Peter McCullough shares shocking new evidence: Pfizer mRNA vaccine is still producing spike protein in a patient’s blood 3.6 years after the shot. This is documented in real bloodwork — causing blood clots and heart damage right now. Not a theory. Not speculation. Measured in a living patient. Meanwhile, the same mRNA technology is being rolled out in new Moderna vaccines for RSV and flu — with even less long-term safety testing. Who is going to hold the politicians, medical community and corporations accountable for mandating and pushing these clot shots? No mRNA vaccine should be recommended until this is properly investigated.
0:41

🚨 Dr. Peter McCullough shares shocking new evidence: Pfizer mRNA vaccine is still producing spike protein in a patient’s blood 3.6 years after the shot. This is documented in real bloodwork — causing blood clots and heart damage right now. Not a theory. Not speculation. Measured in a living patient. Meanwhile, the same mRNA technology is being rolled out in new Moderna vaccines for RSV and flu — with even less long-term safety testing. Who is going to hold the politicians, medical community and corporations accountable for mandating and pushing these clot shots? No mRNA vaccine should be recommended until this is properly investigated.

Dr. Dawn Michael

149,325 просмотров • 21 дней назад

10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried This Week #10 - Drug regulators BUSTED hiding COVID jab risks. Internal emails reveal that the TGA (Australia’s FDA) KNEW that, yes, foreign DNA from the COVID shots really could integrate into the human genome—despite repeatedly assuring the public it was impossible. Rebekkah Barnett (Rebekah Barnett) dropped the bombshell report exposing what TGA staff were saying behind closed doors—and it’s nothing like the rosy picture they painted in public. In one email, a TGA staffer debunked Dr. Paul Offit’s claims that DNA from the COVID shots couldn’t integrate into the human genome without an enzyme called integrase. The staffer wrote: “Foreign DNA can integrate into chromosomal DNA in the absence of an integrase in mammalian cells. This comes from the DNA damage/repair literature where breaks in DNA are repaired through processes called non-homologous end joining or homologous recombination.” This directly contradicted the TGA’s official narrative, which repeatedly denied that such genomic integration was even possible. Another email revealed that the TGA wasn’t even aware of studies to back up their public denials. A senior staffer admitted: “I would be uncomfortable with that [statement about plasmid DNA entering the human genome] as I am unaware of studies which have tested this.” So, behind closed doors, they had serious, unanswered questions about DNA contamination and the potential for genomic integration. But to the public, they said, “Everything is fine.” This isn’t how things are supposed to work. Regulators like the TGA are meant to protect people, not withhold critical information. This is yet another shocking example of how the so-called “experts” prioritized controlling the narrative over presenting the facts. Adding to the alarm, new research from Yale has found spike protein lingering in the blood years after individuals received their last COVID shot, making concerns about integration with human DNA even more plausible. Senator Gerard Rennick from Australia joins the show to discuss these damning revelations. (See 9 More Revealing Stories Below)
25:06

10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried This Week #10 - Drug regulators BUSTED hiding COVID jab risks. Internal emails reveal that the TGA (Australia’s FDA) KNEW that, yes, foreign DNA from the COVID shots really could integrate into the human genome—despite repeatedly assuring the public it was impossible. Rebekkah Barnett (Rebekah Barnett) dropped the bombshell report exposing what TGA staff were saying behind closed doors—and it’s nothing like the rosy picture they painted in public. In one email, a TGA staffer debunked Dr. Paul Offit’s claims that DNA from the COVID shots couldn’t integrate into the human genome without an enzyme called integrase. The staffer wrote: “Foreign DNA can integrate into chromosomal DNA in the absence of an integrase in mammalian cells. This comes from the DNA damage/repair literature where breaks in DNA are repaired through processes called non-homologous end joining or homologous recombination.” This directly contradicted the TGA’s official narrative, which repeatedly denied that such genomic integration was even possible. Another email revealed that the TGA wasn’t even aware of studies to back up their public denials. A senior staffer admitted: “I would be uncomfortable with that [statement about plasmid DNA entering the human genome] as I am unaware of studies which have tested this.” So, behind closed doors, they had serious, unanswered questions about DNA contamination and the potential for genomic integration. But to the public, they said, “Everything is fine.” This isn’t how things are supposed to work. Regulators like the TGA are meant to protect people, not withhold critical information. This is yet another shocking example of how the so-called “experts” prioritized controlling the narrative over presenting the facts. Adding to the alarm, new research from Yale has found spike protein lingering in the blood years after individuals received their last COVID shot, making concerns about integration with human DNA even more plausible. Senator Gerard Rennick from Australia joins the show to discuss these damning revelations. (See 9 More Revealing Stories Below)

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,761,889 просмотров • 1 год назад

Have you ever seen how DNA is organized? It's astounding. A single strand of your DNA, when stretched out, is ~2 meters, or ~6.5 feet long. If you stretched out all the DNA in your body end to end, it could cross the entire solar system, from the sun to Pluto, 17 times. You could wrap all your DNA around the Earth like a rubber band ball almost 2 million times. The storage capacity of DNA is so high that all the world’s digital data (estimated around 175 zettabytes by 2025) could theoretically be stored in just 178lbs of DNA. Imagine, one single server that could handle the entire world's annual data needs. And yet, all of this fits inside the nucleus of a cell, invisible to the naked eye. How is that even possible? To prevent DNA from becoming an tangled mess, unusable for anything, it is organized and packed very specifically. If not for this organization, DNA would be completely unusable for any of Life's processes. It would clump together, unable to be pulled apart to be read by the many interacting molecular systems. To start, smaller segments of DNA are coiled tightly around a special protein called a Histone, whose sole job is to keep DNA organized. This coiled product is called a Nucleosome, which are then further coiled and packed together into long fibers call Chromatin. Chromatin then is further coiled into larger structures called Chromosomes. This organization is not only incredibly efficient, but it also provides functionality to the DNA itself. Chromosome and Chromatin architecture actually effects how DNA functions and communicates with the different systems in the cell, and the number of chromosomes is important to overall function of the DNA in an organism. Without this specific organization, Life could not exist. What does this mean? This means DNA could not have evolved and functioned without simultaneous organization. And DNA can't be organized without the proteins and systems that hold it all together. On top of that, the fact that how DNA is organized affects its function is a clear sign of foresight and planning - all clear signs of intelligent design. The more we learn about molecular biology, the more obvious it is that this was all Created intelligently.
0:45

Have you ever seen how DNA is organized? It's astounding. A single strand of your DNA, when stretched out, is ~2 meters, or ~6.5 feet long. If you stretched out all the DNA in your body end to end, it could cross the entire solar system, from the sun to Pluto, 17 times. You could wrap all your DNA around the Earth like a rubber band ball almost 2 million times. The storage capacity of DNA is so high that all the world’s digital data (estimated around 175 zettabytes by 2025) could theoretically be stored in just 178lbs of DNA. Imagine, one single server that could handle the entire world's annual data needs. And yet, all of this fits inside the nucleus of a cell, invisible to the naked eye. How is that even possible? To prevent DNA from becoming an tangled mess, unusable for anything, it is organized and packed very specifically. If not for this organization, DNA would be completely unusable for any of Life's processes. It would clump together, unable to be pulled apart to be read by the many interacting molecular systems. To start, smaller segments of DNA are coiled tightly around a special protein called a Histone, whose sole job is to keep DNA organized. This coiled product is called a Nucleosome, which are then further coiled and packed together into long fibers call Chromatin. Chromatin then is further coiled into larger structures called Chromosomes. This organization is not only incredibly efficient, but it also provides functionality to the DNA itself. Chromosome and Chromatin architecture actually effects how DNA functions and communicates with the different systems in the cell, and the number of chromosomes is important to overall function of the DNA in an organism. Without this specific organization, Life could not exist. What does this mean? This means DNA could not have evolved and functioned without simultaneous organization. And DNA can't be organized without the proteins and systems that hold it all together. On top of that, the fact that how DNA is organized affects its function is a clear sign of foresight and planning - all clear signs of intelligent design. The more we learn about molecular biology, the more obvious it is that this was all Created intelligently.

Divinely Designed

78,612 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

How many levels of concerning can you fit into 1 x clip? “This to me is quite frightening [what] the hell is that doing in an RNA vaccine” Professor Angus Dalgleish is stunned. There’s DNA contamination and SV40 sequences in Pfizer and one of his patients had a cancer biopsy sent away for analysis….they found spike protein had integrated. To make matters worse, authorities won’t allow post mortem autopsy even after the family has consented. 🚩 10 massive red flags identified by Professor Angus Dalgleish: 1. Quality Control Awful 2. Contaminated with DNA 3. Sequences from the SV40 promoter 4. SV40 and DNA provides theoretical integration risk 5. Literature shows spike protein “integration” 6. “It stays at the injection site” LIE 7. At autopsy spike protein has been identified everywhere 8. “I can’t get autopsies” of patients to prove it 9. Even when immediately family consents to autopsy, they refuse autopsy 10. The peer review process is shielding big pharma I don’t think I’ve often seen a clip that highlights so many issues that regulators continue to ignore
3:38

How many levels of concerning can you fit into 1 x clip? “This to me is quite frightening [what] the hell is that doing in an RNA vaccine” Professor Angus Dalgleish is stunned. There’s DNA contamination and SV40 sequences in Pfizer and one of his patients had a cancer biopsy sent away for analysis….they found spike protein had integrated. To make matters worse, authorities won’t allow post mortem autopsy even after the family has consented. 🚩 10 massive red flags identified by Professor Angus Dalgleish: 1. Quality Control Awful 2. Contaminated with DNA 3. Sequences from the SV40 promoter 4. SV40 and DNA provides theoretical integration risk 5. Literature shows spike protein “integration” 6. “It stays at the injection site” LIE 7. At autopsy spike protein has been identified everywhere 8. “I can’t get autopsies” of patients to prove it 9. Even when immediately family consents to autopsy, they refuse autopsy 10. The peer review process is shielding big pharma I don’t think I’ve often seen a clip that highlights so many issues that regulators continue to ignore

Humanspective

27,491 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨🚨🚨 Dutch Cancer Researcher and Erasmus Medical Centre Assc Prof Maarten Fornerod discusses DNA contamination in COVID Vaccines. ---------------------------- ...for last 35 years or so I've been working uh in the areas of molecular biology, gene expression, biology, cancer biology and recently in the last years, maybe last 10 years in the context of big data and computational biology... ...when we use genetic vaccines what we do essentially is we're making a complex intervention in a very complex system. It's impossible to predict what happens if you combine these two complex systems, and you get unpredictable effects. .. And the only way to go about this is to do genotoxic research, when you want to introduce a genetic medicine into a human being and that genetotic research has to be independent, it has to be double blind, has to be long lasting. AND ALL THESE HAVE NOT BEEN DONE WITH THE GENETIC CORONA VACCINES! if there's a vaccine, there's a little bit of DNA in there upon injection that is very, very rapidly degraded by the human body. However if it's protected and in a lipid nanoarticle it can very efficiently be transduced in the cell... I've been doing this this many, many times. This is called lipofection and it's a very efficient way to introduce DNA into a cell. ...Many people think that this is not possible. But I've been working in nuclear transport for many years, I think more than 10 years. So I've been exposed to a lot of molecular cell biology of nuclear cytoplasmic transport. And it's clear that the DNA can enter the nucleus. Now to make things worse, the mRNA vaccine doesn't stay in the arm but it's detected in , in all different organs including the reproductive system. And so partly this is based on animal models, of course we know from Michael Morz that he has detected uh the spike protein in brain, in the heart and it's for sure it's detected in the blood and even in breast milk. ..So there's NO DOUBT that this mRNA vaccine spreads widely in the human body. ..Now from a genetic point of view, there are possible consequences uh of this and the consequences could be a 1. long term disruption of cellular processes that could lead to disease. 2. there's a risk of insertional mutageenesis in somatic cells that can lead to cancer. 3. the insertion mutogenesis takes place in a germ cell which would be a hereditary burden uh on the human population. 4. And you could also think that these um DNAs, could transfect the microbiome and it could possibly lead to bacterial resistance. So these are all possible..the consequences of these genetic vaccines in my view, the shortcomings in this rollout of these vaccines were there was no genotoxic research performed at all. There was no safety studies, on carcinogenic potential of these vaccines. My personal opinion is that it's now not a question of whether, it will integrate in recipient's DNA, but how often it occurs... It's just a numbers game. If you do this in many cells, many persons it will no doubt integrate in cells in human recipients. So the question does it affect the human genome? I would say it probably, I think it most certainly does. And you see Kevin McKernan here and he represented ah a preliminary data where he detected a possible Pfizer DNA in colon cancer biopsy one year after vaccination.
6:25

🚨🚨🚨 Dutch Cancer Researcher and Erasmus Medical Centre Assc Prof Maarten Fornerod discusses DNA contamination in COVID Vaccines. ---------------------------- ...for last 35 years or so I've been working uh in the areas of molecular biology, gene expression, biology, cancer biology and recently in the last years, maybe last 10 years in the context of big data and computational biology... ...when we use genetic vaccines what we do essentially is we're making a complex intervention in a very complex system. It's impossible to predict what happens if you combine these two complex systems, and you get unpredictable effects. .. And the only way to go about this is to do genotoxic research, when you want to introduce a genetic medicine into a human being and that genetotic research has to be independent, it has to be double blind, has to be long lasting. AND ALL THESE HAVE NOT BEEN DONE WITH THE GENETIC CORONA VACCINES! if there's a vaccine, there's a little bit of DNA in there upon injection that is very, very rapidly degraded by the human body. However if it's protected and in a lipid nanoarticle it can very efficiently be transduced in the cell... I've been doing this this many, many times. This is called lipofection and it's a very efficient way to introduce DNA into a cell. ...Many people think that this is not possible. But I've been working in nuclear transport for many years, I think more than 10 years. So I've been exposed to a lot of molecular cell biology of nuclear cytoplasmic transport. And it's clear that the DNA can enter the nucleus. Now to make things worse, the mRNA vaccine doesn't stay in the arm but it's detected in , in all different organs including the reproductive system. And so partly this is based on animal models, of course we know from Michael Morz that he has detected uh the spike protein in brain, in the heart and it's for sure it's detected in the blood and even in breast milk. ..So there's NO DOUBT that this mRNA vaccine spreads widely in the human body. ..Now from a genetic point of view, there are possible consequences uh of this and the consequences could be a 1. long term disruption of cellular processes that could lead to disease. 2. there's a risk of insertional mutageenesis in somatic cells that can lead to cancer. 3. the insertion mutogenesis takes place in a germ cell which would be a hereditary burden uh on the human population. 4. And you could also think that these um DNAs, could transfect the microbiome and it could possibly lead to bacterial resistance. So these are all possible..the consequences of these genetic vaccines in my view, the shortcomings in this rollout of these vaccines were there was no genotoxic research performed at all. There was no safety studies, on carcinogenic potential of these vaccines. My personal opinion is that it's now not a question of whether, it will integrate in recipient's DNA, but how often it occurs... It's just a numbers game. If you do this in many cells, many persons it will no doubt integrate in cells in human recipients. So the question does it affect the human genome? I would say it probably, I think it most certainly does. And you see Kevin McKernan here and he represented ah a preliminary data where he detected a possible Pfizer DNA in colon cancer biopsy one year after vaccination.

aussie17

126,273 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨🚨🚨🚨 For the first time, German TV MDR covers DNA contamination in Pfizer's mRNA vaccine! ---------Transcript----------- We are in a private laboratory in Magdeburg. Professor Brigitte König is examining Corona vaccines here. The result, all samples are contaminated. "With foreign DNA that should not be in the vaccine in this quantity. From my point of view, the alarming result is that all 5 batches had significant foreign DNA in them, which are well above the limit. It's about the BioNTech-Pfizer vaccine. 5 batches were given to the Magdeburg laboratory because there was a suspicion." Foreign DNA could be contained in the vaccine, and beyond the limit. According to WHO, the limit is a total DNA content of 10 nanograms per dose. It is important that this is not exceeded, because there is a risk that foreign DNA could penetrate human cells. Brigitte König is an external professor at the medical faculty of the University of Magdeburg. She shows us the result of her privately conducted investigation. All 5 examined batches are contaminated. For the lowest concentration, the limit was exceeded by 83 times. The highest concentration found was 354 times the limit to König. This is concerning. The client of the analysis is also a private individual. The biologist Dr. Jürgen Kirchner. He has been one of the vocal critics of mRNA vaccines for years. He operates a website called Gene Vaccines. There he also advertises his books written under a pseudonym. His last one is called "Sullied." He has also appeared on YouTubers like the controversial Corona critic Paul Brandenburg. And discussed with him his theses on vaccines. Also the findings from Magdeburg. When DNA contaminations are found in a vaccine, that are as far above the limits as we have found, then in my view a special paragraph of the Medicines Act automatically applies, that is paragraph 5. It says if a medicinal product is questionable, then it must be taken off the market. And the biologist tries to achieve this. In September, he was at a hearing in the Bundestag's Petitions Committee on the topic of pandemic planning. Here he used the opportunity to present the analysis results from Magdeburg. These are gigantic exceedances of a limit for a really very questionable medicinal product. But do the vaccines actually contain foreign DNA? The accusation is not new. Already in April 2023, American scientists found foreign DNA above the limit in the vaccines from BioNTech and Moderna. Also in this pre-publication of a Canadian study from the end of October, several scientists come to a similar conclusion. The researchers write, our results extend the existing concerns regarding vaccine safety. But are such traces of foreign DNA actually dangerous? Humans constantly carry foreign DNA in themselves. This can come from food, but also if bacteria enter the lungs. These floating DNA snippets are digested in the gut by enzymes. But there is a difference with the mRNA vaccination. The vaccine contains so-called lipid nanoparticles. They smuggle the mRNA into the cells. They do not differentiate, however, whether they transport mRNA or DNA. Could foreign DNA thereby directly penetrate the cell nucleus? That is at least the concern of this American researcher, Prof. Dr. Philip Buckhaults. He is a clear proponent of mRNA technology. Yet he too says he found DNA residues in Pfizer vaccine. Here at a hearing in the South Carolina Senate, he explains the potential consequences of DNA. By email he writes us, at the moment no one knows for sure, whether the foreign DNA has caused damage or will cause damage. But there is clearly a justified theoretical risk of genetic damage to long-lived stem cells. We asked several renowned German scientists about this concern. Only a few reply to our request. Among them is Prof. Emanuel Wyler from the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, an institute funded by the federal government. He deems it extremely unlikely that the DNA could have negative consequences. Further, he writes, DNA in vaccines is not a new topic and is also tested for, for example, in a flu vaccine. Until now, no one has been interested, or one rightly trusts that the Paul Ehrlich Institute as the responsible authority performs the testing work correctly. In my opinion, this shows that this is not about DNA in vaccines, but either about fundamentally questioning vaccinations, our best weapon against infectious diseases, or about creating a sensation with the issue of Corona. However, Prof. Gerald Dyker, a chemist at the Ruhr University, does think that negative consequences are conceivable. He writes to us, against the background that one was under extreme time pressure, that the manufacturer decided, either without knowledge or with the acquiescence of supervisory authorities, to release the product with the remaining DNA impurities for mass vaccination. For Prof. Bernd Mühlbauer of the Drug Commission, however, it is still not clear at all, whether the vaccine is actually contaminated to a worrying extent. But he writes that residual amounts of DNA in the case of an mRNA vaccine cannot penetrate the cell nucleus and cause damage. Such experiments, including animal tests over several generations, are necessary and perhaps have already been conducted. And how do the authorities respond to the debate? The Paul Ehrlich Institute is responsible for the surveillance and safety of vaccines. We want to know, whether they themselves have tested the vaccines for foreign DNA or at least checked the results from Magdeburg. The written response is that parameters such as the residual DNA content in the vaccine are only experimentally tested by the manufacturer. The Institute thus does not test the vaccines themselves for DNA contamination but relies on the manufacturers' test protocols. The fact that the authority neither tests itself nor checks the analysis results from Magdeburg causes surprise to Professor Brigitte König. "I would have expected, or assumed, that the authorities would at least randomly check the end product for contamination and purity. Depending on the product, or if something else is inside. As I said, the authorities can do that. Especially the Paul Ehrlich Institute has the equipment for it." The competent Federal Ministry of Health questions the analysis from Magdeburg and points out that some of the tested batches were already expired, according to Dr. Kirchner's notification. However, for the found foreign DNA this is irrelevant, says the scientist. The DNA in these lipid particles does not multiply. And is more likely to be decomposed. That is, if the vaccine is not expired, we might expect even higher values but not lower ones. The DNA does not multiply in a sterile vaccine. Since the authorities apparently doubt the investigation results from Magdeburg, we want to have various batches tested ourselves. We contacted more than 20 laboratories, some of them at German universities, but also private providers who can conduct such analyses. From all, we received rejections or no response. So, we failed to have a DNA analysis conducted independently once again. It would indeed be important to conclusively clarify the question of the DNA content. Because one reason for suspected DNA contamination could be the manufacturing process itself, which is different from the one used during the authorization study. The vaccine used for the clinical studies was manufactured mechanically without the involvement of microorganisms. This production path is named Process 1 in the documents of the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Pfizer then switched to a different production technique, referred to as Process 2. Only very few subjects in the authorization study received this vaccine. Here, the material was supplied by genetically modified bacteria. This process was apparently less complex. But did it actually pose a higher risk? That there were differences between the batches of the two different manufacturing processes has been a concern. Questions about comparability, characterization, and clinical suitability were raised. We ask BioNTech why the manufacturing process was changed nonetheless, but we do not receive an answer to this question. Regarding the suspected DNA contamination identified by the Magdeburg scientist, the company writes that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine is not contaminated with DNA. Furthermore, it states that the batches were subjected to comprehensive quality control by the manufacturer. The Magdeburg scientist says that she has now examined additional vaccine batches. Here too, she found foreign DNA. However, we as an editorial team were not able to conclusively answer whether this analysis is indeed accurate and, most importantly, whether the suspected DNA contamination can cause harm. The most recent act in the debate is this official-looking letter from an association called Medical Treatment Association, which warns doctors about the vaccine. However, as informed by the responsible authorities, this is said to be a false report. ----------------------------------- H/T: Aquarius-elect 🗣️
11:26

🚨🚨🚨🚨 For the first time, German TV MDR covers DNA contamination in Pfizer's mRNA vaccine! ---------Transcript----------- We are in a private laboratory in Magdeburg. Professor Brigitte König is examining Corona vaccines here. The result, all samples are contaminated. "With foreign DNA that should not be in the vaccine in this quantity. From my point of view, the alarming result is that all 5 batches had significant foreign DNA in them, which are well above the limit. It's about the BioNTech-Pfizer vaccine. 5 batches were given to the Magdeburg laboratory because there was a suspicion." Foreign DNA could be contained in the vaccine, and beyond the limit. According to WHO, the limit is a total DNA content of 10 nanograms per dose. It is important that this is not exceeded, because there is a risk that foreign DNA could penetrate human cells. Brigitte König is an external professor at the medical faculty of the University of Magdeburg. She shows us the result of her privately conducted investigation. All 5 examined batches are contaminated. For the lowest concentration, the limit was exceeded by 83 times. The highest concentration found was 354 times the limit to König. This is concerning. The client of the analysis is also a private individual. The biologist Dr. Jürgen Kirchner. He has been one of the vocal critics of mRNA vaccines for years. He operates a website called Gene Vaccines. There he also advertises his books written under a pseudonym. His last one is called "Sullied." He has also appeared on YouTubers like the controversial Corona critic Paul Brandenburg. And discussed with him his theses on vaccines. Also the findings from Magdeburg. When DNA contaminations are found in a vaccine, that are as far above the limits as we have found, then in my view a special paragraph of the Medicines Act automatically applies, that is paragraph 5. It says if a medicinal product is questionable, then it must be taken off the market. And the biologist tries to achieve this. In September, he was at a hearing in the Bundestag's Petitions Committee on the topic of pandemic planning. Here he used the opportunity to present the analysis results from Magdeburg. These are gigantic exceedances of a limit for a really very questionable medicinal product. But do the vaccines actually contain foreign DNA? The accusation is not new. Already in April 2023, American scientists found foreign DNA above the limit in the vaccines from BioNTech and Moderna. Also in this pre-publication of a Canadian study from the end of October, several scientists come to a similar conclusion. The researchers write, our results extend the existing concerns regarding vaccine safety. But are such traces of foreign DNA actually dangerous? Humans constantly carry foreign DNA in themselves. This can come from food, but also if bacteria enter the lungs. These floating DNA snippets are digested in the gut by enzymes. But there is a difference with the mRNA vaccination. The vaccine contains so-called lipid nanoparticles. They smuggle the mRNA into the cells. They do not differentiate, however, whether they transport mRNA or DNA. Could foreign DNA thereby directly penetrate the cell nucleus? That is at least the concern of this American researcher, Prof. Dr. Philip Buckhaults. He is a clear proponent of mRNA technology. Yet he too says he found DNA residues in Pfizer vaccine. Here at a hearing in the South Carolina Senate, he explains the potential consequences of DNA. By email he writes us, at the moment no one knows for sure, whether the foreign DNA has caused damage or will cause damage. But there is clearly a justified theoretical risk of genetic damage to long-lived stem cells. We asked several renowned German scientists about this concern. Only a few reply to our request. Among them is Prof. Emanuel Wyler from the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, an institute funded by the federal government. He deems it extremely unlikely that the DNA could have negative consequences. Further, he writes, DNA in vaccines is not a new topic and is also tested for, for example, in a flu vaccine. Until now, no one has been interested, or one rightly trusts that the Paul Ehrlich Institute as the responsible authority performs the testing work correctly. In my opinion, this shows that this is not about DNA in vaccines, but either about fundamentally questioning vaccinations, our best weapon against infectious diseases, or about creating a sensation with the issue of Corona. However, Prof. Gerald Dyker, a chemist at the Ruhr University, does think that negative consequences are conceivable. He writes to us, against the background that one was under extreme time pressure, that the manufacturer decided, either without knowledge or with the acquiescence of supervisory authorities, to release the product with the remaining DNA impurities for mass vaccination. For Prof. Bernd Mühlbauer of the Drug Commission, however, it is still not clear at all, whether the vaccine is actually contaminated to a worrying extent. But he writes that residual amounts of DNA in the case of an mRNA vaccine cannot penetrate the cell nucleus and cause damage. Such experiments, including animal tests over several generations, are necessary and perhaps have already been conducted. And how do the authorities respond to the debate? The Paul Ehrlich Institute is responsible for the surveillance and safety of vaccines. We want to know, whether they themselves have tested the vaccines for foreign DNA or at least checked the results from Magdeburg. The written response is that parameters such as the residual DNA content in the vaccine are only experimentally tested by the manufacturer. The Institute thus does not test the vaccines themselves for DNA contamination but relies on the manufacturers' test protocols. The fact that the authority neither tests itself nor checks the analysis results from Magdeburg causes surprise to Professor Brigitte König. "I would have expected, or assumed, that the authorities would at least randomly check the end product for contamination and purity. Depending on the product, or if something else is inside. As I said, the authorities can do that. Especially the Paul Ehrlich Institute has the equipment for it." The competent Federal Ministry of Health questions the analysis from Magdeburg and points out that some of the tested batches were already expired, according to Dr. Kirchner's notification. However, for the found foreign DNA this is irrelevant, says the scientist. The DNA in these lipid particles does not multiply. And is more likely to be decomposed. That is, if the vaccine is not expired, we might expect even higher values but not lower ones. The DNA does not multiply in a sterile vaccine. Since the authorities apparently doubt the investigation results from Magdeburg, we want to have various batches tested ourselves. We contacted more than 20 laboratories, some of them at German universities, but also private providers who can conduct such analyses. From all, we received rejections or no response. So, we failed to have a DNA analysis conducted independently once again. It would indeed be important to conclusively clarify the question of the DNA content. Because one reason for suspected DNA contamination could be the manufacturing process itself, which is different from the one used during the authorization study. The vaccine used for the clinical studies was manufactured mechanically without the involvement of microorganisms. This production path is named Process 1 in the documents of the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Pfizer then switched to a different production technique, referred to as Process 2. Only very few subjects in the authorization study received this vaccine. Here, the material was supplied by genetically modified bacteria. This process was apparently less complex. But did it actually pose a higher risk? That there were differences between the batches of the two different manufacturing processes has been a concern. Questions about comparability, characterization, and clinical suitability were raised. We ask BioNTech why the manufacturing process was changed nonetheless, but we do not receive an answer to this question. Regarding the suspected DNA contamination identified by the Magdeburg scientist, the company writes that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine is not contaminated with DNA. Furthermore, it states that the batches were subjected to comprehensive quality control by the manufacturer. The Magdeburg scientist says that she has now examined additional vaccine batches. Here too, she found foreign DNA. However, we as an editorial team were not able to conclusively answer whether this analysis is indeed accurate and, most importantly, whether the suspected DNA contamination can cause harm. The most recent act in the debate is this official-looking letter from an association called Medical Treatment Association, which warns doctors about the vaccine. However, as informed by the responsible authorities, this is said to be a false report. ----------------------------------- H/T: Aquarius-elect 🗣️

aussie17

456,071 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Kevin McKernan issues a warning about the "genomic integration" story. Big Pharma wants you to get lost in proving integration, when the DNA contamination is "inhibiting p53", which is an oncogenic driver. Kevin McKernan: "I think the integration story is a little bit of a misdirection." "Pharmaceutical companies are asking everyone to look for that, and unless you find that, it doesn't matter." "That's not true. In fact, the moment the DNA gets into the cell, it triggers a particular pathway that can be oncogenic, known as the cGAS-STING pathway." "It's an inflammatory response because it sees bacterial DNA in a cell, and it thinks you're septic. So, you get this massive cytokine and interferon response. The transfection of the DNA into the cells is the problem because it comes from bacteria. Since it's bacterial DNA, it has some methylation signals that trigger a certain response." "I think that's the main issue that we're probably seeing in more of the acute side of the reactions. If it's proven that they've integrated that, of course, it might be playing a role in cancer. But once that DNA has gotten into the cell, it's inhibiting p53. That's where it should end. If any shot has a p53 inhibitor that was never disclosed, it should be banned from the marketplace, and the people who did it and hid it from the regulator should be in jail." Kevin McKernan also mentioned in another podcast the amount of regulatory red tape that scientists have to go through to prove integration is immense. This is why Big Pharma want you to focus on that.
1:42

Kevin McKernan issues a warning about the "genomic integration" story. Big Pharma wants you to get lost in proving integration, when the DNA contamination is "inhibiting p53", which is an oncogenic driver. Kevin McKernan: "I think the integration story is a little bit of a misdirection." "Pharmaceutical companies are asking everyone to look for that, and unless you find that, it doesn't matter." "That's not true. In fact, the moment the DNA gets into the cell, it triggers a particular pathway that can be oncogenic, known as the cGAS-STING pathway." "It's an inflammatory response because it sees bacterial DNA in a cell, and it thinks you're septic. So, you get this massive cytokine and interferon response. The transfection of the DNA into the cells is the problem because it comes from bacteria. Since it's bacterial DNA, it has some methylation signals that trigger a certain response." "I think that's the main issue that we're probably seeing in more of the acute side of the reactions. If it's proven that they've integrated that, of course, it might be playing a role in cancer. But once that DNA has gotten into the cell, it's inhibiting p53. That's where it should end. If any shot has a p53 inhibitor that was never disclosed, it should be banned from the marketplace, and the people who did it and hid it from the regulator should be in jail." Kevin McKernan also mentioned in another podcast the amount of regulatory red tape that scientists have to go through to prove integration is immense. This is why Big Pharma want you to focus on that.

Humanspective

45,236 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад