Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

This situation is profoundly concerning and highlights certain negative cultural practices present in #Morocco 🇲🇦. It is often observed that Moroccan men may resort to violence against women when their efforts to engage in bribery do not yield the desired results. The cow shown in this video exemplifies—— Morocco... became India and Prank Israel. Assertions were, majority of women in Morocco remain single due to men displaying behaviors that have traditionally been attributed to women. Guest it is true. Also read this - The taxi driver (he/she) must be identified and taken into custody. Genyada should also consider taking legal actions against that thing; it is uncertain how many individuals he/she may have harmed in a similar manner. #Somali #Casablanca DGSN MAROC #Moroccan #American #Mogadishu #African #MiddleEastern #Redsea #Egypt #Somaliashow more

Mohamed Olad

9,722 subscribers

158,833 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Education Health & Wellness #Morocco

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Comments

Layla Mohamed1 year ago

Muslim woman traveling without muhrim not good.

Mohamed Olad1 year ago

Our woman are free and in today’s world it is not necessary. Leave that for the oppressors & the misogynist jealous creatures.

Ahmed Al-Jaberti 🇸🇱 ﷽1 year ago

@Laylah1548 you are absolutely right! I dont understand what have misogyny jealousy oppressors to do with muslim women following that which the Prophet has left behind! Muslim women shouldnt be travelling without muhram! Islam has no time period where it applies!

Mohamed Olad1 year ago

@Laylah1548 Welcome to reality and to the real world. We don’t need hypocrisy here.

YUSUF 🇸🇴 🇩🇯1 year ago

She's wrong, travelling alone and take pictures with criminals such as taliban

Mohamed Olad1 year ago

Oh now you have issues with Taliban. “She wrong because she took pictures with taliban” 🙈

imMayaala-b1 year ago

They r really the worst people on this earth, they stole without limit, perversion of morality, do not know religion, see they are out of Arab culture. and do not know the عيب

Mohamed Olad1 year ago

It is quite alarming to me. If this is the manner in which they treat visitors, particularly women, what else might they neglect? A change is necessary.

SDM DR1 year ago

My brother, I do respect you, but what do you think will happen when a wonem travels alone by herself? I mean without mehram consistently?? I am saying that I do nothing against her, but she is making a great mistake. And he deserve what even happened to her .

Mohamed Olad1 year ago

That is there but again the exception is also there. I would’ve loved to see another person with her but again we are not in the past and the right era. No society can control their women. Besides, Morocco is 99% Muslim state if Im not mistaken; it is men should’ve taken the lead of protecting the visitors and the vulnerable.

Related Videos

This man, I don’t even call him a sheikh. He’s promoting honor killings as a form of discipline. He’s saying Somali men are like Afghan men. Does he not know that Afghan men sleep with young boys? Does he not know that Afghan men are terrorists? Does he not know that Afghan men torture their own women? Yet he wants to compare Somali men to them, indirectly or directly telling Somali men to follow in the footsteps of Afghan men. This is the same man who is married to a non-Somali woman and has mixed children, yet he wants to give advice to Somali men on how to deal with Somali women. This isn’t the first time he’s said things like this. He needs to be stopped and reported He is promoting extremist ideas and inciting hatred and violence against women, and that is completely unacceptable. someone married to non Somali woman, he doesn’t have any saying regarding any Somali women’s affairs.

This man, I don’t even call him a sheikh. He’s promoting honor killings as a form of discipline. He’s saying Somali men are like Afghan men. Does he not know that Afghan men sleep with young boys? Does he not know that Afghan men are terrorists? Does he not know that Afghan men torture their own women? Yet he wants to compare Somali men to them, indirectly or directly telling Somali men to follow in the footsteps of Afghan men. This is the same man who is married to a non-Somali woman and has mixed children, yet he wants to give advice to Somali men on how to deal with Somali women. This isn’t the first time he’s said things like this. He needs to be stopped and reported He is promoting extremist ideas and inciting hatred and violence against women, and that is completely unacceptable. someone married to non Somali woman, he doesn’t have any saying regarding any Somali women’s affairs.

Maryan

111,812 views • 2 months ago

Kesha says American men are disappointing in bed and claims she’d rather date “kings” in Italy. She also argues that while men often shame women for m6st6rbation, self-pleasure is one of the simplest ways women can find happiness, relief and emotional balance. Kesha adds that she practices what she calls “gratitude m6st6rbation” — a form of self-appreciation and body worship. though she says men often label her a narcissist for it, she would really not have it another way.👀👀 ‘American men are so bad at s6x , I am always c6libate until I go to Italy where i get to f—-k kings, when I’m not in Italy , I engage in gratitude m6st6rbation and men call me a narcissist for that but i don’t see why men try to shame women for trying to make themselves happy, It is the cheapest thing to remain emotionally balanced’👀👀

Sensitive content

Kesha says American men are disappointing in bed and claims she’d rather date “kings” in Italy. She also argues that while men often shame women for m6st6rbation, self-pleasure is one of the simplest ways women can find happiness, relief and emotional balance. Kesha adds that she practices what she calls “gratitude m6st6rbation” — a form of self-appreciation and body worship. though she says men often label her a narcissist for it, she would really not have it another way.👀👀 ‘American men are so bad at s6x , I am always c6libate until I go to Italy where i get to f—-k kings, when I’m not in Italy , I engage in gratitude m6st6rbation and men call me a narcissist for that but i don’t see why men try to shame women for trying to make themselves happy, It is the cheapest thing to remain emotionally balanced’👀👀

hyz

127,365 views • 4 months ago

From the Epstein files… It is being said that in this video a young girl is approached in a friendly manner and then taken away in a vehicle.. There are claims that she was later reported missing and has not been found to this day.. Meanwhile her family is said to have continued demanding justice.. It is deeply concerning that according to these claims full justice has still not been achieved.. This situation highlights the need for truth proper investigation and accountability..?

From the Epstein files… It is being said that in this video a young girl is approached in a friendly manner and then taken away in a vehicle.. There are claims that she was later reported missing and has not been found to this day.. Meanwhile her family is said to have continued demanding justice.. It is deeply concerning that according to these claims full justice has still not been achieved.. This situation highlights the need for truth proper investigation and accountability..?

Nain Bosan

79,228 views • 5 months ago

“The ABC made a bet that women would not fight back against the absolute nonsense that is men claiming to be women. As they didn't anticipate women fighting back, they're now in the uncomfortable situation of it being clear that they have not reported on this issue accurately.”

“The ABC made a bet that women would not fight back against the absolute nonsense that is men claiming to be women. As they didn't anticipate women fighting back, they're now in the uncomfortable situation of it being clear that they have not reported on this issue accurately.”

Sall Grover

104,932 views • 10 months ago

One of the most powerful moments you will see in Parliament this year. Today, Jess Phillips read the names of 107 women killed, or suspected to have been killed, by men over the last year. Each a reminder as to why violence against women and girls must be tackled as the national emergency it is. They came from every background, every walk of life. Their names are a stark reminder that, for too long, violence against women and girls has been treated as a fact of life - but we will not accept this. Our Violence Against Women and Girls strategy, launched in December, is only the beginning. We are committed to acting faster and doing whatever it takes to protect more women and girls from harm.

One of the most powerful moments you will see in Parliament this year. Today, Jess Phillips read the names of 107 women killed, or suspected to have been killed, by men over the last year. Each a reminder as to why violence against women and girls must be tackled as the national emergency it is. They came from every background, every walk of life. Their names are a stark reminder that, for too long, violence against women and girls has been treated as a fact of life - but we will not accept this. Our Violence Against Women and Girls strategy, launched in December, is only the beginning. We are committed to acting faster and doing whatever it takes to protect more women and girls from harm.

Home Office

378,837 views • 6 months ago

🇮🇱 If this is true, then this is concerning I haven’t seen footage of Hamas raping women, but I heard it’s in the film that’s been screened to journalists Violence against women, ANY WOMAN, should be taken seriously and addressed, and women’s rights organizations should act. I do have a concern however, the video says Hamas had instructions to rape women, but we debunked this claim a while ago: The instructions were aimed as undressing MALE SOLDIERS and taking their weapons, and not raping women. Why make false claims? What happened on Oct 7 is bad as it is. There is no need to fabricate claims to make it worse. My heart goes out to every woman harmed on Oct 7, and every woman suffering in Gaza ❤️

🇮🇱 If this is true, then this is concerning I haven’t seen footage of Hamas raping women, but I heard it’s in the film that’s been screened to journalists Violence against women, ANY WOMAN, should be taken seriously and addressed, and women’s rights organizations should act. I do have a concern however, the video says Hamas had instructions to rape women, but we debunked this claim a while ago: The instructions were aimed as undressing MALE SOLDIERS and taking their weapons, and not raping women. Why make false claims? What happened on Oct 7 is bad as it is. There is no need to fabricate claims to make it worse. My heart goes out to every woman harmed on Oct 7, and every woman suffering in Gaza ❤️

Mario Nawfal

1,024,623 views • 2 years ago

Lala says she hates when husbands get involved in their wives’ drama, adding that viewers will see this play out on The Valley. She does not name who she is referring to, but I heard that it could be Danny. That criticism feels misplaced because this is not The Real Housewives it is The Valley, an ensemble show with both men and women. From seasons one and two, the men have been involved in the drama, and that is simply how the show works. #TheValley

Lala says she hates when husbands get involved in their wives’ drama, adding that viewers will see this play out on The Valley. She does not name who she is referring to, but I heard that it could be Danny. That criticism feels misplaced because this is not The Real Housewives it is The Valley, an ensemble show with both men and women. From seasons one and two, the men have been involved in the drama, and that is simply how the show works. #TheValley

Bye Wig Hello Drama

93,055 views • 8 months ago

"The man is the master of the wife in Islam. They are not equal. Do not imitate the West. Since we live in the West, our women think that men are equal to them, & this is wrong. Women must obey men.” "He added: “It is haram for a woman to go out of her husband's house without his permission, & she must not raise her voice against her husband, & she must not sleep while her husband is angry with her. Complete backward ideology that treats women as second class citizens.

Sensitive content

"The man is the master of the wife in Islam. They are not equal. Do not imitate the West. Since we live in the West, our women think that men are equal to them, & this is wrong. Women must obey men.” "He added: “It is haram for a woman to go out of her husband's house without his permission, & she must not raise her voice against her husband, & she must not sleep while her husband is angry with her. Complete backward ideology that treats women as second class citizens.

Benonwine

242,245 views • 7 months ago

“I can define a woman… I just take an inclusive approach.” This means she includes men in her definition of women. Ffs. There is a lot to unpack in this snide & immature clip. First of all, Amanda Camm MP is correct: you cannot protect women if you can’t define them. Otherwise, who are you protecting? How are you catering to specific needs? How are you helping a woman whose protection involves single-sex care? Words only purpose is that they have objective meaning. Next, an inclusive approach to the definition of women is… only including women. That’s what inclusivity actually is. Allowing men to be classed as women simply turns the category of woman into a mixed sexed category. It dismantles the category. It’s not inclusive, it’s destructive. Then, she calls defining a woman as importing Trumpian-style politics to Australia. This is laughably stupid. Trump didn’t decide what a woman is, he acknowledged that accurately defining women in law & society was a no brainer political win & ceased upon the opportunity. If you do want to talk about importing American ideologies, that conversation will be about gender ideology. You don’t have an issue with importing problems, only the solution. Not wanting to stop with the stupidity, she then says that it’s all a distraction from the actual issue: men’s violence against women. Who and what are you talking about? If those words aren’t defined, the statement makes no sense. I’ll prove it: in the event there is male violence against men who claim to be women, that is going to be for a very different reason than men’s violence against women, requiring different plans & solutions. See, even to defend your stupid ideology it’s important to have correct definitions so everyone gets the correct help. Finally, she mocks being told it’s tokenistic to wear purple to support the “queer community”. It’s so pathetic, I’m not even going to bother commenting on it. When she was the Minister for Women, Shannon Fentiman blocked me because I said that a woman is an adult human female. She ignored pleas from me and many Queensland-based women to meet with her to discuss our opposition to self ID laws. She says she is not ashamed of her stance but she should be. She is ignoring women in favor of men, proving in actions instead of words that she knows *exactly* what a woman is.

“I can define a woman… I just take an inclusive approach.” This means she includes men in her definition of women. Ffs. There is a lot to unpack in this snide & immature clip. First of all, Amanda Camm MP is correct: you cannot protect women if you can’t define them. Otherwise, who are you protecting? How are you catering to specific needs? How are you helping a woman whose protection involves single-sex care? Words only purpose is that they have objective meaning. Next, an inclusive approach to the definition of women is… only including women. That’s what inclusivity actually is. Allowing men to be classed as women simply turns the category of woman into a mixed sexed category. It dismantles the category. It’s not inclusive, it’s destructive. Then, she calls defining a woman as importing Trumpian-style politics to Australia. This is laughably stupid. Trump didn’t decide what a woman is, he acknowledged that accurately defining women in law & society was a no brainer political win & ceased upon the opportunity. If you do want to talk about importing American ideologies, that conversation will be about gender ideology. You don’t have an issue with importing problems, only the solution. Not wanting to stop with the stupidity, she then says that it’s all a distraction from the actual issue: men’s violence against women. Who and what are you talking about? If those words aren’t defined, the statement makes no sense. I’ll prove it: in the event there is male violence against men who claim to be women, that is going to be for a very different reason than men’s violence against women, requiring different plans & solutions. See, even to defend your stupid ideology it’s important to have correct definitions so everyone gets the correct help. Finally, she mocks being told it’s tokenistic to wear purple to support the “queer community”. It’s so pathetic, I’m not even going to bother commenting on it. When she was the Minister for Women, Shannon Fentiman blocked me because I said that a woman is an adult human female. She ignored pleas from me and many Queensland-based women to meet with her to discuss our opposition to self ID laws. She says she is not ashamed of her stance but she should be. She is ignoring women in favor of men, proving in actions instead of words that she knows exactly what a woman is.

Sall Grover

40,771 views • 1 year ago

A 12yo Moroccan boy cries and begs the troops in Ceuta not to send him home. It is reported that he had an escort for part of the way to Ceuta, but later he was left alone. The Spanish Civil Guard took the boy into custody, and soon he will return to Morocco. How could his parents just let their child go?

A 12yo Moroccan boy cries and begs the troops in Ceuta not to send him home. It is reported that he had an escort for part of the way to Ceuta, but later he was left alone. The Spanish Civil Guard took the boy into custody, and soon he will return to Morocco. How could his parents just let their child go?

Chay Bowes

70,089 views • 1 month ago

From the Epstein files… It is being reported that in this video a young girl is approached in a friendly way and then taken away in a vehicle.. There are claims that she was later declared missing and has not been found to this day.. Meanwhile her family is said to have continued seeking justice.. It is deeply concerning that, according to these claims, full justice has still not been delivered.. This situation highlights the need for truth, proper investigation, and accountability..?

From the Epstein files… It is being reported that in this video a young girl is approached in a friendly way and then taken away in a vehicle.. There are claims that she was later declared missing and has not been found to this day.. Meanwhile her family is said to have continued seeking justice.. It is deeply concerning that, according to these claims, full justice has still not been delivered.. This situation highlights the need for truth, proper investigation, and accountability..?

𓆩𝐀𝐛𝐢𝐝 𝐇𝐮𝐬𝐬𝐚𝐢𝐧𓆪

13,754 views • 4 months ago

This is deeper than illegal migration. It’s an act of war. Moroccan authorities were spotted standing aside and even actively aiding the invaders into Spain. Reports (and the videos themselves) suggest these aren’t poor refugees, but fighting age men. Many are leaving Morocco because of crimes they committed there. Keep in mind, this is taking place in Ceuta. Not mainland Spain. Ceuta is a Spanish enclave whose population regularly reasserts they want to remain Spanish, not Moroccan. Morocco is intentionally sending their most violent individuals to kill the Spanish “imperialists” (ironic coming from Muslims). We’ve known the entire time that this is a third world Islamic invasion, not a refugee crisis. But please take the word “invasion” completely literally. It’s not political rhetoric. Morocco knows exactly what they’ve just done. They just declared war on Europe in a very literal sense. Of course, neither Spain nor the EU will treat it that way, but they should.

This is deeper than illegal migration. It’s an act of war. Moroccan authorities were spotted standing aside and even actively aiding the invaders into Spain. Reports (and the videos themselves) suggest these aren’t poor refugees, but fighting age men. Many are leaving Morocco because of crimes they committed there. Keep in mind, this is taking place in Ceuta. Not mainland Spain. Ceuta is a Spanish enclave whose population regularly reasserts they want to remain Spanish, not Moroccan. Morocco is intentionally sending their most violent individuals to kill the Spanish “imperialists” (ironic coming from Muslims). We’ve known the entire time that this is a third world Islamic invasion, not a refugee crisis. But please take the word “invasion” completely literally. It’s not political rhetoric. Morocco knows exactly what they’ve just done. They just declared war on Europe in a very literal sense. Of course, neither Spain nor the EU will treat it that way, but they should.

Vince Dao

93,198 views • 2 months ago

🤦‍♂️ CAR CRASH Interview: Hackney Green Mayor Zoe Garbett’s excruciating, slippery dance around one simple question about women. Stig Abell: “There’s law that says women should be able to have access to spaces that biological men cannot. That is now a right that is enshrined in law. When you say that trans women should be allowed into there, you are competing against that right?” Zoe deflects to EHRC guidance and claims many organisations say third spaces for trans people is against their human rights and Equality Act. Stig rightly jumps in and says: “The Supreme Court ruling, is the Supreme Court ruling. It’s called the Supreme Court for a reason. As Hackney mayor you can’t do anything about that can you? Are you saying that trans women should have access to women only spaces in Hackney?” She completely ignores it: “What we need to talk is how people are living their everyday lives” and how she’s “talking to trans legal clinic and other organisations to make sure the rights of trans people aren’t being excluded from public life.” Stig, frustrated: “So do you want trans women to access women’s spaces in Hackney? You would like that to happen?” Zoe dodges again: “I deeply care about the safety of women in Hackney. I’ve made this a priority. Domestic violence in this country needs to be seriously looked at. This whole conversation is completely ignoring the fact that women are most under threat from a domestic partner.” Stig interrupts again: “We have regular conversations about domestic violence but my question is a different one. Would you like there to be in Hackney the fact that trans women can enter women only spaces?” Finally she admits it: “I think its about what we’re talking about in terms of women only spaces, like trans women for me should have the right to access women’s spaces, they are women.” Stig puts her right: “Well they’re not according to the law. That’s precisely what the Supreme Court’s saying they’re not. They’re not biological women.” Zoe: “But this is why we need to look at what spaces we’re talking about.” Stig, losing patience, again cuts her off: “It might be changing rooms, it might be refuges, places where women want to be away from men. The law says that trans women are not allowed there and I think you’re saying you wouldn’t want to uphold that law?” Zoe in full denial: “But trans women are women and they face higher risks of sexual violence.” Stig, not letting her off the hook: “But they’re not women according to the Supreme Court?” Zoe freezes for a second, then says: “But then I think that’s where we have a problem and we’ll continue to see that challenged because if we want to keep women safe then this ruling doesnt do that.” She says keeping biological men out of women’s spaces makes women less safe. She “deeply cares about the safety of women” and prioritises domestic violence, yet wants men in women’s refuges. She talks endlessly about helping women while completely ignoring women’s rights in favour of a minority of men. Absolutely exhausting ideological contortions. One straight question took Herculean effort to get a straight(ish) answer. This is what woke governance looks like, slippery, evasive, and dangerous for actual women. Stig deserves a medal for persisting. Most just let them spout their soundbites. Hackney, this is your mayor. 😵‍💫

🤦‍♂️ CAR CRASH Interview: Hackney Green Mayor Zoe Garbett’s excruciating, slippery dance around one simple question about women. Stig Abell: “There’s law that says women should be able to have access to spaces that biological men cannot. That is now a right that is enshrined in law. When you say that trans women should be allowed into there, you are competing against that right?” Zoe deflects to EHRC guidance and claims many organisations say third spaces for trans people is against their human rights and Equality Act. Stig rightly jumps in and says: “The Supreme Court ruling, is the Supreme Court ruling. It’s called the Supreme Court for a reason. As Hackney mayor you can’t do anything about that can you? Are you saying that trans women should have access to women only spaces in Hackney?” She completely ignores it: “What we need to talk is how people are living their everyday lives” and how she’s “talking to trans legal clinic and other organisations to make sure the rights of trans people aren’t being excluded from public life.” Stig, frustrated: “So do you want trans women to access women’s spaces in Hackney? You would like that to happen?” Zoe dodges again: “I deeply care about the safety of women in Hackney. I’ve made this a priority. Domestic violence in this country needs to be seriously looked at. This whole conversation is completely ignoring the fact that women are most under threat from a domestic partner.” Stig interrupts again: “We have regular conversations about domestic violence but my question is a different one. Would you like there to be in Hackney the fact that trans women can enter women only spaces?” Finally she admits it: “I think its about what we’re talking about in terms of women only spaces, like trans women for me should have the right to access women’s spaces, they are women.” Stig puts her right: “Well they’re not according to the law. That’s precisely what the Supreme Court’s saying they’re not. They’re not biological women.” Zoe: “But this is why we need to look at what spaces we’re talking about.” Stig, losing patience, again cuts her off: “It might be changing rooms, it might be refuges, places where women want to be away from men. The law says that trans women are not allowed there and I think you’re saying you wouldn’t want to uphold that law?” Zoe in full denial: “But trans women are women and they face higher risks of sexual violence.” Stig, not letting her off the hook: “But they’re not women according to the Supreme Court?” Zoe freezes for a second, then says: “But then I think that’s where we have a problem and we’ll continue to see that challenged because if we want to keep women safe then this ruling doesnt do that.” She says keeping biological men out of women’s spaces makes women less safe. She “deeply cares about the safety of women” and prioritises domestic violence, yet wants men in women’s refuges. She talks endlessly about helping women while completely ignoring women’s rights in favour of a minority of men. Absolutely exhausting ideological contortions. One straight question took Herculean effort to get a straight(ish) answer. This is what woke governance looks like, slippery, evasive, and dangerous for actual women. Stig deserves a medal for persisting. Most just let them spout their soundbites. Hackney, this is your mayor. 😵‍💫

J Stewart

33,728 views • 3 months ago

Why are so many young people single these days? Pooja Arora (Pooja Arora): So my last question: I wanted to talk about why people are single nowadays. I would have asked about human nature, but that’s for another day. I sent you an article—how do you think common knowledge fits into that area? Why do you think so many youngsters are single? Me: Yes, it’s a good question. I’m not sure that common knowledge is an important part of the answer, but some of it is that women no longer depend on the economic contributions of men for their livelihood, as was true, say, in my mother’s era, when women were not professionally trained. To pay the rent, they had to be married. Now, not only are women better educated, but the economy has shifted to favor the kinds of skills that women, as opposed to men, have. And just as women have been rising, men have been sinking because of the decline in blue-collar work. There have also been cultural trends that favor women’s temperaments. Men have been distracted by internet gaming, gambling, and pornography and are less desirable as marriage partners. Women with more economic power are more likely to raise their standards for what they want in a man. In my parents’ generation, it was not uncommon for a woman to marry a man with much less education and, sometimes, less intelligence. This was not unusual among my parents’ friends. The men often had a high school degree and then went immediately into a small business—sometimes a family business, sometimes one he started himself. The criterion was: does he make a living? No one cared about education. That has changed, with the result that there are fewer men who satisfy the criteria women now have. This was mentioned in the article you shared with me. Also, with more sexual freedom, people don’t have to get married simply to have sex, which was again true in my parents’ generation. There’s a process that has been in place since the baby boomers and has accelerated among millennials and Generation Z. For other reasons, I think a generation of men may also be incapable of socially skilled interaction, partly because they’ve grown up with screens instead of face-to-face contact. There is some fear that a sexual encounter could result in an accusation of rape or sexual harassment. There is so much pornography that, for an increasing number of men, it serves as an outlet for what in the past would have required actual human contact. There are many factors. The article from The Economist lists them, I think, quite skillfully. It’s not clear how to reverse the trend. Increasing the economic prospects of men and creating an educational system that is less feminized and more encouraging of male achievement might help. Another could be changing norms—and here common knowledge comes in. Among women, is it a sign of low status to be with a man who has less education than you? Men, from time immemorial, have been happy to marry women with less education than themselves. Women don't. That immediately reduces the marriage pool. Maybe that’s a norm that could change. Go back to the norm in my parents’ generation? Pooja Arora: No, let’s not do that. Me: Okay, let's not do that. Pooja Arora: We’re happy to marry men who are not as educated as us. It’s fine. They just have to be nice and kind at this point in time. Me: Well, yes—exactly. Nice and kind.

Why are so many young people single these days? Pooja Arora (Pooja Arora): So my last question: I wanted to talk about why people are single nowadays. I would have asked about human nature, but that’s for another day. I sent you an article—how do you think common knowledge fits into that area? Why do you think so many youngsters are single? Me: Yes, it’s a good question. I’m not sure that common knowledge is an important part of the answer, but some of it is that women no longer depend on the economic contributions of men for their livelihood, as was true, say, in my mother’s era, when women were not professionally trained. To pay the rent, they had to be married. Now, not only are women better educated, but the economy has shifted to favor the kinds of skills that women, as opposed to men, have. And just as women have been rising, men have been sinking because of the decline in blue-collar work. There have also been cultural trends that favor women’s temperaments. Men have been distracted by internet gaming, gambling, and pornography and are less desirable as marriage partners. Women with more economic power are more likely to raise their standards for what they want in a man. In my parents’ generation, it was not uncommon for a woman to marry a man with much less education and, sometimes, less intelligence. This was not unusual among my parents’ friends. The men often had a high school degree and then went immediately into a small business—sometimes a family business, sometimes one he started himself. The criterion was: does he make a living? No one cared about education. That has changed, with the result that there are fewer men who satisfy the criteria women now have. This was mentioned in the article you shared with me. Also, with more sexual freedom, people don’t have to get married simply to have sex, which was again true in my parents’ generation. There’s a process that has been in place since the baby boomers and has accelerated among millennials and Generation Z. For other reasons, I think a generation of men may also be incapable of socially skilled interaction, partly because they’ve grown up with screens instead of face-to-face contact. There is some fear that a sexual encounter could result in an accusation of rape or sexual harassment. There is so much pornography that, for an increasing number of men, it serves as an outlet for what in the past would have required actual human contact. There are many factors. The article from The Economist lists them, I think, quite skillfully. It’s not clear how to reverse the trend. Increasing the economic prospects of men and creating an educational system that is less feminized and more encouraging of male achievement might help. Another could be changing norms—and here common knowledge comes in. Among women, is it a sign of low status to be with a man who has less education than you? Men, from time immemorial, have been happy to marry women with less education than themselves. Women don't. That immediately reduces the marriage pool. Maybe that’s a norm that could change. Go back to the norm in my parents’ generation? Pooja Arora: No, let’s not do that. Me: Okay, let's not do that. Pooja Arora: We’re happy to marry men who are not as educated as us. It’s fine. They just have to be nice and kind at this point in time. Me: Well, yes—exactly. Nice and kind.

Steven Pinker

89,160 views • 7 months ago

The debate about #IstanbulConvention is not just about combating violence against women (all sane people oppose violence against women), but redefining what a woman is. According to this Convention, "gender" is not related to a biological sex anymore, but "the socially constructed roles, behaviours, activities and attributes that a given society considers appropriate for women and men". To claim that womanhood is not a reality in itself, but something so fluid, relative and uncertain so others – ie society – have to agree on what is or "considers appropriate" to be is simply absurd. If this is not the biggest threat to womanhood, then what is? Based on this aggressive gender ideology non-sense, a man can claim that he identifies as a car, and the society should give him a license plate, instead of an ID card. You can find below the exchange of views between myself and the socialist MEP Evin Incir debating this issue on May 9, 2023, in the European Parliament.

The debate about #IstanbulConvention is not just about combating violence against women (all sane people oppose violence against women), but redefining what a woman is. According to this Convention, "gender" is not related to a biological sex anymore, but "the socially constructed roles, behaviours, activities and attributes that a given society considers appropriate for women and men". To claim that womanhood is not a reality in itself, but something so fluid, relative and uncertain so others – ie society – have to agree on what is or "considers appropriate" to be is simply absurd. If this is not the biggest threat to womanhood, then what is? Based on this aggressive gender ideology non-sense, a man can claim that he identifies as a car, and the society should give him a license plate, instead of an ID card. You can find below the exchange of views between myself and the socialist MEP Evin Incir debating this issue on May 9, 2023, in the European Parliament.

Cristian Terhes MEP

49,154 views • 3 years ago

Now even Taiwanese men are mocking Indian men because of Indian feminist women. The context is that this openly gay Taiwanese actor, Cheng Chang Fan, visited India for a shoot. When he was being greeted by a female hotel staff member, he posted the video on Instagram. It got millions of views, and the comments were filled with feminist women shipping them together and saying that foreign men are a better match for Indian women, that Indian men are sexual assaulters, while foreign men are kind and respectful. Taiwanese men are also making fun of Indian men in the comments. The actor gained hundreds of thousands of followers, and now he is making more content about India. What is the solution to this? The PR for foreign men is high, and the hatred toward Indian men is also high in India. Is promoting more foreign women into Sanatan Dharma and removing these feminists from our Hindu community the only solution?

Now even Taiwanese men are mocking Indian men because of Indian feminist women. The context is that this openly gay Taiwanese actor, Cheng Chang Fan, visited India for a shoot. When he was being greeted by a female hotel staff member, he posted the video on Instagram. It got millions of views, and the comments were filled with feminist women shipping them together and saying that foreign men are a better match for Indian women, that Indian men are sexual assaulters, while foreign men are kind and respectful. Taiwanese men are also making fun of Indian men in the comments. The actor gained hundreds of thousands of followers, and now he is making more content about India. What is the solution to this? The PR for foreign men is high, and the hatred toward Indian men is also high in India. Is promoting more foreign women into Sanatan Dharma and removing these feminists from our Hindu community the only solution?

︎ ︎venom

140,400 views • 1 month ago

Watch: A Muslim imam in Berlin complains about living in a Christian country where women have freedom, saying it turns men into “sex addicts.” He then argues that women do not deserve autonomy or basic rights. By his own words, women should stay home, need a husband’s permission to study or work, exist to be sexually available, and have their bodies treated as male property. This is not culture. This is an ideology of ownership. Is this the “diversity” Europe is told to celebrate?

Watch: A Muslim imam in Berlin complains about living in a Christian country where women have freedom, saying it turns men into “sex addicts.” He then argues that women do not deserve autonomy or basic rights. By his own words, women should stay home, need a husband’s permission to study or work, exist to be sexually available, and have their bodies treated as male property. This is not culture. This is an ideology of ownership. Is this the “diversity” Europe is told to celebrate?

Yossi BenYakar

78,512 views • 7 months ago