Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

This smarmy British interviewer was incredulous and indignant when Nathan Cofnas told him how many blacks would make Harvard without affirmative action. The only problem is...those stats came directly from Harvard.

21,754 просмотров • 1 день назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Xinny the Pooh
Xinny the Pooh1 день назад

Typical leftist just running through their usual tactics one by one. First he asks for the source, and then when he realizes that he can't use that against this guy he covertly accuses him of having bad intentions. An argument with a leftist is never about the truth.

Фото профиля I,Hypocrite
I,Hypocrite1 день назад

🎯

Фото профиля No Quarter
No Quarter1 день назад

WW1 and WWII were deliberate eugenic programs to destroy the best, most intelligent, strongest Europeans. The rejects stayed behind to reproduce. Modern medicine has kept their dysgenic progeny alive when their bloodline should have died off.

Фото профиля Jay Que
Jay Que1 день назад

You are correct.

Фото профиля Newday858
Newday8581 день назад

And @NickFerrariLBC is meant to be on the right 🤡

Фото профиля Tiur
Tiur1 день назад

The stats hit different when they come straight from the source

Фото профиля J. Nico
J. Nico1 день назад

Just watched this on YidTube.

Фото профиля Imperius
Imperius1 день назад

Propping up a )e\/\/ish Psyop. I, Hypocrite is pointless.

Фото профиля Paige
Paige1 день назад

I don't even need to ask for an early life here

Фото профиля Psi
Psi1 день назад

I listened to this while driving yesterday and I must say, that interviewer might be one of the single most insufferable people I've ever witnessed in my entire life. A man who was clearly not punched enough growing up.

Похожие видео

Victor Davis Hanson unpacked why Donald Trump has taken aim at Harvard University—and made clear that this is no impulsive move. It’s a calculated stand, rooted in a long list of grievances. “Recently, Donald Trump has escalated his struggle with Harvard University,” Hanson began, setting the stage. At the center of the clash is Harvard’s response to a 2022 Supreme Court ruling that struck down affirmative action in college admissions. The Court ordered schools like Harvard and UNC to stop giving preference in admissions, hiring, and promotion based on race or gender. But Hanson argued Harvard simply sidestepped the ruling. “They were by court order to stop giving preference... what we would call DEI,” he said. “Harvard has been skirting that, and I think the data is pretty clear... there’s no question they’ve been doing it.” That was just the beginning. Hanson pointed to other long-standing issues: undisclosed foreign money, often from countries like Communist China and Qatar, and campus practices that seem increasingly radical. “There have been, in the past, graduations and dorms that have a racial basis—almost a segregation element to them,” he said. And when it comes to speech? Hanson claimed Harvard hasn’t exactly protected the First Amendment. “You can make the argument that they don’t fully honor the First Amendment when you have guest speakers,” he noted, describing how students are often allowed—if not outright encouraged—to shut down viewpoints they don’t agree with. Then came the most explosive accusation: a growing climate of antisemitism. Hanson recalled two Harvard students who assaulted a Jewish peer—one was later given a $65,000 honorarium through the law school, the other honored as a graduation marshal at the Divinity School. “That sent the wrong message,” he said.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

194,702 просмотров • 1 год назад

Bill Ackman Bill Ackman discusses President Trump's battle with Harvard. Bill Ackman: "The wrong thing to do is receive a letter from the Administration and write back saying: we're doing nothing and in fact, we're going to sue you." "What Harvard should have done is say: President Trump - you make some good points. Taxpayer money coming to Harvard is a privilege, not a right." Taxpayer money going to an institution - an institution cannot have massive amounts of administrative bloat, waste, bureaucracy- we're going to eliminate it." Bill Ackman goes further on the culture at Harvard. "There is not viewpoint diversity at Harvard. Students are self-censoring their remarks in classrooms. Faculty are doing the same - people are afraid to have real conversations. You go to college to be exposed to a broad array of ideas - and that's not happening at Harvard. Free speech is not happening." On Trump trying to make a deal with Harvard. "He (President Trump) wants to make a deal. Make a deal with the President. Commit to fix these things, which by the way, your alumni want you to fix - it's in the best interest of Harvard. Treat shareholder taxpayer money as a fiduciary." Fair or unfair to take the tax exempt status away? "I think it's fair. Harvard became over time a political advocacy organization for one party. When a University goes from being a University to effecting and becoming a political activist organization - it doesn't deserve a non-profit status." "Harvard should be a place where students go to learn and the best research gets done. It shouldn't be a place that is allowing pro-terrorist orgs on campus and only allows certain kinds of thinking and speech on campus - that's a political advocacy organization - not a University."

Barbie True Blue

712,341 просмотров • 1 год назад