Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

This started with Mark R. Levin supporting a post calling out Jack Posobiec for hypocrisy. Not Catholicism. Not a rosary. The issue was the contradiction of Jack presenting himself as devout while also promoting and supporting neo Nazi rhetoric and extremist bigotry. Instead of addressing that contradiction of his...

350,167 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

DISTURBING CONTENT WARNING: SA AND HARM TO CHILDREN Alandra Markman describes the BREEDING COMPOUND in Mexico that he was sent to by the satanic cult that ritually tortured abused and raped him since birth. They were breeding Jewish bloodlines and he was selected for his more than 99% pure Ashkenazi Jewish heritage and apparent decendancy directly from King Solomon. This specific breeding compound was in Mexico and is described as a Satanic Monastery. He alleges that to the best of his knowledge it was run by one of the most prominent philanthropists in the Seattle area (a woman- not bill gates) In other clips I posted yesterday he describes being forced to fight in child cage death matches in front of paying audiences of wealthy elites and politicians as well as meeting Jeffrey Epstein and being groomed for an acting career before flopping out of it. As to credibility, to get a sense for his full story- watch the whole interview here: Worth noting that he has a documented and verifiable history of healing from this abuse over more than a decade, has known Anneke Lukas (the interviewer) for many years. It is clear that this is his whole life- not just an hour of acting. As for believing what he says- I always start with the question- what would he gain from making this up if actually none of it’s true? Furthermore- when you cross reference his story with other survivors of satanic ritual abuse(of which there are waaaaay too many), the similarities are numerous. Our world is infected by evil at the highest levels. And it’s only a matter of time before a culture of disclosure that we foster together, combined with the power of the internet starts exposing people even more evil and involved than Epstein was. Truth will win. Love will win.
10:00

Sensitive content

DISTURBING CONTENT WARNING: SA AND HARM TO CHILDREN Alandra Markman describes the BREEDING COMPOUND in Mexico that he was sent to by the satanic cult that ritually tortured abused and raped him since birth. They were breeding Jewish bloodlines and he was selected for his more than 99% pure Ashkenazi Jewish heritage and apparent decendancy directly from King Solomon. This specific breeding compound was in Mexico and is described as a Satanic Monastery. He alleges that to the best of his knowledge it was run by one of the most prominent philanthropists in the Seattle area (a woman- not bill gates) In other clips I posted yesterday he describes being forced to fight in child cage death matches in front of paying audiences of wealthy elites and politicians as well as meeting Jeffrey Epstein and being groomed for an acting career before flopping out of it. As to credibility, to get a sense for his full story- watch the whole interview here: Worth noting that he has a documented and verifiable history of healing from this abuse over more than a decade, has known Anneke Lukas (the interviewer) for many years. It is clear that this is his whole life- not just an hour of acting. As for believing what he says- I always start with the question- what would he gain from making this up if actually none of it’s true? Furthermore- when you cross reference his story with other survivors of satanic ritual abuse(of which there are waaaaay too many), the similarities are numerous. Our world is infected by evil at the highest levels. And it’s only a matter of time before a culture of disclosure that we foster together, combined with the power of the internet starts exposing people even more evil and involved than Epstein was. Truth will win. Love will win.

Ian Carroll

708,828 views • 2 years ago

ABC's Jonathan Karl at 445pm Eastern on a phone call he had with President Trump after leaRNing of Charlie Kirk's assassination: “I had a brief conversation with the President over the phone. He sounded quite upset, quite down about this. ‘He told me it's horrific. It's one of the most horrific things I've ever seen. He was a great guy. He was a good man. He was an incredible guy. There's nobody like him.’ Charlie Kirk, as Mary pointed out, was truly a personal confidant of the president, incredibly close to the President's son, Donald Trump Jr. and really, in many ways, the beating heart of the MAGA movement, his Turning point USA organization, not just a campus organization. David, this was an organization that put on some of the largest and most ambitious conventions, rallies, events for Donald Trump around the country with pyrotechnics and huge crowds. Also, one other thing I think that is very important about Charlie Kirk is that is that he was somebody, particularly in recent months, who was making a point to try to engage with those that he disagreed with. Look, he had far right views, some very controversial views, but he sat down not long ago and did a podcast with Gavin Newsom, the governor of California. On — on his college campus tours, he would often give speeches. He would be protested. But then when it was over, when the discussion was over, his part of speaking, he would welcome questions from the crowds, including hostile questions in many cases from college students, and engage in those who found his views deeply problematic and offensive. He wanted to engage in those people, and he did so directly. And in fact, that appears to be what he was doing today in Utah when this horrific event happened.”

Curtis Houck

648,268 views • 9 months ago

CNN’s Kristen Holmes: “I just want to point out one thing before we get into the power and influential person that Charlie Kirk was..not just a political activist. He was also a father and a husband. And you have to remember something when you talk about Donald Trump's campaign and the team that got him elected, it was a very small, very tight knit group of people. It was loyalists, people who were gathered around Donald Trump working in and out every day. And Charlie Kirk was part of that movement. So, when you're talking to these White House advisers and staffers and friends of the President, it's not just them looking at the death of an icon and a movement leader, as we've heard, it's also them looking at the death of a very close friend and somebody they spent an enormous amount of time with...[T]hat's why you're seeing such a sadness and a disbelief from so many people close to the President. And when it comes to talking strictly about his influence and his power within Washington, I mean, one of the things to keep in mind here is that this is somebody who had a direct line to President Trump who could voice his objections to President Trump at times, he could voice what he thought was important and not being covered enough by the administration. He spoke to many, if not all, of the cabinet secretaries directly. He had a finger on the pulse of the MAGA movement, even more so than some people who are here in Washington who got government positions. If you look at the crowd that had gathered around Kirk, that was just one example of the kind of crowds that Kirk would draw. He was truly a movement leader, as we've heard. He would bring thousands and thousands of people together, and that was why he was so critical beyond just the personal to the campaign to President Trump...So, there are a lot of different levels of all of this. The influence, the power, the — the connection to the base, but also the family and the relationships that Charlie Kirk had built with all of the Trumps. We have seen the children responding each individually about their relationships with Charlie Kirk saying to pray for him and his family.”

Curtis Houck

1,160,867 views • 9 months ago

Gang Starr - “Mass Appeal” “Mass Appeal” was a turning point for DJ Premier. I remember the first time I heard “Mass Appeal.” It was on Gang Starr’s 1994 album, ‘Hard to Earn.’ I played this song over and over. Serious repeat! What caught my attention the most was how Premier chopped the sample, and then arranged it in a way that the ends exploded every time the loop turned over. What’s more, at the point where the loop turns, there isn’t a dominate kick, which was typical of most hip hop/rap songs of that period. The absence of the kick on the loop turning point convinced me that Premier was in the midst of a sound change. Having heard his beatwork on ‘Illmatic’ just a couple of months before, I was wondering if his beats would be in the same vein or take a different direction. Two songs into ‘Hard to Earn,’ I knew Premier was going for a new sound. And what tipped me off was his experimentation with his drums. I was paying extra close attention to Premier’s use of the kick drum. Specifically, I was studying the ways in which he was starting to “relax” the punch of his kicks while still coming up with non-conventional drum frameworks. On “Mass Appeal,” it was if Premier had challenged himself to devise a moderately syncopated kick pattern underneath a deceptively simple sample arrangement. If you listen to “Mass Appeal,” pay careful attention to how the end of the sample seems to speed up. Truth is, it doesn’t. By chopping the end of the sample the way he did, and by easing up on the attack (the front-end) of the sample, an otherwise simple 1-bar measure is transformed into something akin to break in a record being “pushed” forward by the DJ. And what makes this all more complex than most people realize is the fact that the tempo — which stays the same throughout — is managed thoroughly by the kick pattern and shuffling hat pattern.

The Art of Sampling

21,979 views • 3 months ago

Quentin Taratino said Lawrence Fishburne’s performance in King of New York was so incredible he thought - “he could be the greatest actor of his generation”. He explains: "As great as Christopher Walken is in this movie. To me, it's Larry Fishburne's movie - it was the rock that becomes a diamond aspect of the movie. It's why I could defend this movie against all comers, because to me, Fish's performance in this movie was comparable to a young Brando. It was the most exciting performance by an actor of his generation that I'd seen in a movie of that time. And I thought, well, that's it. There is a new Marlon Brando, and his name is Larry Fishburne - it was amazing, it was mesmerizing… He is the first hip hop gangster in movie history. That character had never been done before this. He invented that character. And he invented it as something to do. It wasn't in the original script. He came up with that himself… The three big Fishburne moments to me, is his opening sequence with…Tito. That's it, with Tito - black glove dude. And his reunion with Frank. And then it's the chicken scene (see below). Those are his three big arias. Not only that though - expressions that I would later hear for the rest of the decade, I actually heard for the first time in that scene. I'd never heard the expression; “I'll slap the black off you” before. That was the first time I heard it when Fish says it to Snipes. I've since heard it many times… And that was actually the first time I ever heard, “fuck you very much”. And I would proceed to hear that for the rest of the 90s. But those were the first times I'd ever heard those expressions… As terrific as he has been in other things - the level of excitement that I had over him when this movie was over, I have never had that excitement again. I thought, with this, he could be the greatest actor of his generation. That was an actual, real fucking thing. He could be the greatest actor of his generation after seeing this." Quote comes from The Rewatchables podcast

Gangster Cinema Central

652,514 views • 22 days ago