Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

This throws a bit of a monkey-wrench into the mainstream narrative that these megaliths were shaped with manual hand-tools doesn’t it? (Ollantaytambo)

32,057 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨This One Thing DESTROYS The Narrative! Once you absorb this simple fact, you can't actually deny how illogical the mainstream historical narrative is here: Walking around Ollantaytambo in Perus Sacred Valley, you find huge megalithic blocks of rose quartz granite strewn across the hillside, like they were blown over with tremendous force. Some of the megalithic work is still intact but most of it has been severely damaged. Then we see simplistic, rough-cut stone walls and structures that are STILL STANDING. These walls use mud and simple mortar as a binding agent, unlike the megalithic work they are not in the least bit resistant to significant kinetic force, you see these simple stone wall techniques tucked into cracks and corners where megalithic work has been damaged/moved, i.e RESTORATION, clear, evidential restoration attempts with significantly inferior stone building techniques. I could take these simple walls down with a sledgehammer. I couldn't take some of the surviving megalithic walls down with a wrecking ball. But mainstream archeologists will insist that both the megalithic, precision shaped, air-tight fitted, non-mortar using, kinetically resistant, multi-ton, extremely hard stone material constructs, that demonstrably show they have survived majorly destructive forces, were constructed by the same people (Inca) who made the rough-cut walls that show no signs of undergoing significant damage, during the same time period of around 600 years ago. This is literally devoid of logic, but this is what we are being told to believe.

Jay Anderson

273,941 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten