正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

🚨 This US 🇺🇸 vote just changed everything 🚨 Britain 🇬🇧 must pay attention. Congress just passed a defence bill that locks US troops into Europe, funds Ukraine for two more years, and reinforces NATO’s eastern flank. Congress just slammed the brakes on Trump. It directly contradicts Trump’s own...

319,311 次观看 • 8 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

😩 Britain has wasted ten years trying to square the Brexit circle that cannot be squared: how do you remove the barriers while refusing the structures that remove them? Starmer chose the Ming vase strategy with red lines that protected Brexit by making any meaningful reset impossible and leant heavily into Atlanticism. The red lines of the 2024 mandate stunted the EU reset and Burnham can’t easily escape this. He also needs to keep together a country still scarred by the Leave/Remain divide, while freeing Britain from red lines. This is why the security argument is vital - Russia. Ukraine. Trump. Energy. Food. Defence. Technology. Critical supply chains. Nick Boles’s proposed goods-only arrangement may ultimately be unacceptable cherry-picking to the EU. But domestically it creates political space to ask whether Britain’s security now requires a fundamentally different relationship with Europe. Andy Burnham doesn’t need to fight the next election shouting Single Market, Customs Union, freedom of movement. He needs a manifesto giving him a mandate to negotiate the deepest economic and security relationship with our European allies necessary to protect Britain’s national interest without repeating Starmer’s red lines. Then negotiate. If the electorate endorses that manifesto, Burnham isn’t breaking the previous mandate. He has won a new one. And for the first time since Brexit, Britain could sit down with Europe without tying both hands behind its back before the negotiations even begin. Britain’s chief EU negotiator Hamish Falconer MP says the Burnham government wants a deeper, more ambitious relationship with Europe on trade, services, security and technology. He also says plainly: We are part of Europe. The 2024 Brexit red lines remain … for now. But Falconer is deliberately talking about the art of the possible, while refusing to bind Labour’s next manifesto to those red lines. The world has changed since 2016; Britain can’t change its geography.

Liz Webster

19,906 次观看 • 9 天前

🚨 Donald Trump says, “We’re going to run the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper, and judicious transition… We’re there now, and we’re going to stay.” This is not ambiguity. This is not bluster. This is a public declaration of occupation. A US president announcing in plain English that America will govern another sovereign country by force until it decides otherwise. He boasts about equipment. He boasts about killing boats. He boasts about strikes. And then he says the quiet part out loud: ➡️ The US will decide who runs Venezuela. ➡️ The US will stay as long as it wants. ➡️ The US will not “take a chance” on Venezuelans choosing wrongly. This is not democracy. This is imperial rule. And it mirrors, word for word, the logic used by Vladimir Putin: • We know best • They can’t be trusted • We’ll stay until it’s “safe” • Law is secondary to power Now look at Britain. Keir Starmer has said nothing. No criticism. No warning. No defence of international law. That silence now sits next to Trump’s own words. Brexit Britain was sold sovereignty. What it delivered was dependency. Outside the EU, the UK no longer anchors itself in collective law or restraint, it orbits US power instead. And when the US openly abandons the rules, Britain looks away. You cannot defend Ukraine and excuse this. You cannot condemn Putin and stay silent on Trump. You cannot claim to stand for law while backing occupation “until we decide”. Trump isn’t hiding what he’s doing. He’s boasting. The real question is why so many leaders in the UK especially are pretending not to hear him. Because once a powerful state can openly say “we will run another country”, the rules-based order is already gone. And silence doesn’t preserve it. Silence finishes it.

Liz Webster

15,455 次观看 • 7 个月前