正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

This video CLEARLY shows 2 RED, fully functioning taillights. Idc what anyone says, if that taillight were "broken" the way that it was in the crime scene photos, it would NOT be lighting up like that, especially with the diffusers broken. Not to mention, Maureen Hartnett and Ashley Vallier,...

little_foot777's profile picture

That Girl T

3,107 subscribers

14,722 次观看 • 20 天前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

You know they are getting desperate when the trolls go back to the Lexus taillight being their best piece of evidence to prove that "Karen Read is a killer". So for the uneducated folks in the back spreading bullshit, here is a cheat sheet: 🔹️the Lexus taillight is polycarbonate, not glass 🔹️all of the bulbs are red, not clear 🔹️when the diffuser is broken, NO LIGHT filters up or down the taillight 🔹️a reflector is on the side of the taillight which can appear "white" in certain reflections/lighting but there are no bulbs/LEDs on this reflector When leaving John O'Keefe's home at 5am, Karen's taillight shows no damage to it's diffusers as the taillight is completely lit. You see this as she brakes to pull out of the driveway. Guess what was found by Massachusetts State Police and SERT ~12 hours later at 34 Fairview? ➡️ A large piece of diffuser. Now let's ponder: If the diffuser was intact at 5am but then not at 545pm, what happened to it?
3:24

You know they are getting desperate when the trolls go back to the Lexus taillight being their best piece of evidence to prove that "Karen Read is a killer". So for the uneducated folks in the back spreading bullshit, here is a cheat sheet: 🔹️the Lexus taillight is polycarbonate, not glass 🔹️all of the bulbs are red, not clear 🔹️when the diffuser is broken, NO LIGHT filters up or down the taillight 🔹️a reflector is on the side of the taillight which can appear "white" in certain reflections/lighting but there are no bulbs/LEDs on this reflector When leaving John O'Keefe's home at 5am, Karen's taillight shows no damage to it's diffusers as the taillight is completely lit. You see this as she brakes to pull out of the driveway. Guess what was found by Massachusetts State Police and SERT ~12 hours later at 34 Fairview? ➡️ A large piece of diffuser. Now let's ponder: If the diffuser was intact at 5am but then not at 545pm, what happened to it?

BoozeyBeauty

28,596 次观看 • 7 个月前

Such a great point made by Larry Forman. In order for the taillight pieces from Karen Read's Lexus to scatter into a 20-30ft radius, John O'Keefe would have to be hit with such a force making them literally explode into that type of radius. It wouldn't happen if John O'Keefe were hit by the Lexus going 24mph, in reverse, in the snow, with no broken bones, and without anyone seeing or hearing the supposed accident. It's just not possible. I agree with Larry, that type of scattering would be more consistent with being hit by a MAC Truck going way over 24mph. Go watch Larry's video of him going over the sidebars in Bukhenik's testimony. #FKR #FreeTurtleboy #Bukhenik #KarenReadWasFramed
1:54

Such a great point made by Larry Forman. In order for the taillight pieces from Karen Read's Lexus to scatter into a 20-30ft radius, John O'Keefe would have to be hit with such a force making them literally explode into that type of radius. It wouldn't happen if John O'Keefe were hit by the Lexus going 24mph, in reverse, in the snow, with no broken bones, and without anyone seeing or hearing the supposed accident. It's just not possible. I agree with Larry, that type of scattering would be more consistent with being hit by a MAC Truck going way over 24mph. Go watch Larry's video of him going over the sidebars in Bukhenik's testimony. #FKR #FreeTurtleboy #Bukhenik #KarenReadWasFramed

That Girl T

19,215 次观看 • 24 天前

.Sara Haines: "When the person you voted for does not win, you do not say the system must be broken or that it was rigged. You say, it is what it is and you show up anyway." "I still feel that optimistic because I feel arm in arm with so many people who agree with me. I'm not going to stop marching."
1:07

.Sara Haines: "When the person you voted for does not win, you do not say the system must be broken or that it was rigged. You say, it is what it is and you show up anyway." "I still feel that optimistic because I feel arm in arm with so many people who agree with me. I'm not going to stop marching."

The View

228,430 次观看 • 1 年前

Hank Brennan’s citing the presence of touch DNA from Officer John O’Keefe found on Karen Read’s vehicle (in reality it was sampled from a taillight piece “found” at the scene, not on the actual vehicle) as being inculpatory. What he fails to mention is that TWO other unidentified DNA profiles were also found on that same piece of taillight. So is the Commonwealth’s new position that Karen Read struck and killed two other unidentified individuals with her taillight that night? #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial
0:31

Hank Brennan’s citing the presence of touch DNA from Officer John O’Keefe found on Karen Read’s vehicle (in reality it was sampled from a taillight piece “found” at the scene, not on the actual vehicle) as being inculpatory. What he fails to mention is that TWO other unidentified DNA profiles were also found on that same piece of taillight. So is the Commonwealth’s new position that Karen Read struck and killed two other unidentified individuals with her taillight that night? #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial

Olivia

36,395 次观看 • 1 年前

New Video- SERT SEARCH: Hiding The Damage When you look at this case through the lens that the MSP (Tully, Proctor & Yuri) were working an "honest investigation, not covering anything up"- is when you truly see how unexplainable their actions during the investigation were. Looking through that lens, when you think about Yuri, Proctor & Tully NOT providing SERT A photograph of the damaged taillight, there is no explanation for it. -They "KNEW" how much damage there was to the taillight -They KNEW SERT was at the scene LOOKING for the taillight -They KNEW that nobody at the scene knew how much damage was at the time. KNOWING this, for them to not send a picture to Tully of the damage to assist the SERT search makes ZERO sense. They should have WANTED to find as much taillight as possible. The problem is, the taillight they needed to be there, wasn't. yet.
3:47

New Video- SERT SEARCH: Hiding The Damage When you look at this case through the lens that the MSP (Tully, Proctor & Yuri) were working an "honest investigation, not covering anything up"- is when you truly see how unexplainable their actions during the investigation were. Looking through that lens, when you think about Yuri, Proctor & Tully NOT providing SERT A photograph of the damaged taillight, there is no explanation for it. -They "KNEW" how much damage there was to the taillight -They KNEW SERT was at the scene LOOKING for the taillight -They KNEW that nobody at the scene knew how much damage was at the time. KNOWING this, for them to not send a picture to Tully of the damage to assist the SERT search makes ZERO sense. They should have WANTED to find as much taillight as possible. The problem is, the taillight they needed to be there, wasn't. yet.

Joe Flipperhead

51,464 次观看 • 1 年前

After scraping John O’Keefe’s clothing, tiny fragments of broken taillight (a match to Karen Read’s taillight) were found embedded in his shirt. Not just “stuck” or “resting on” the fabric. Embedded. This means the fragments were pressed into the fibers of the fabric - forced into the weave of the shirt by impact, pressure or friction. Think of a splinter of glass that slices into a shirt during an accident. The fragments found were about 1/8 inch by 1/16 inch. That’s about the size of: •A tiny wood splinter •A coarse grain of sand •A fragment of crushed red pepper •The leg of a small ant •A piece of cracked nail or shell Imagine trying to manually embed something that small into a shirt. Not tape it on. Not drop it into a pocket. Physically force it into the threads of a cotton shirt. You’d need tools, magnification, and a steady hand and still probably couldn’t do it convincingly without damaging the fabric or leaving evidence. So there’s really only one explanation - those fragments were embedded during an actual, forceful impact. John O’Keefe wasn’t planted in the snow by his friends that night. He was hit and those taillight fragments were driven into his clothing by the force of that collision.
3:42

After scraping John O’Keefe’s clothing, tiny fragments of broken taillight (a match to Karen Read’s taillight) were found embedded in his shirt. Not just “stuck” or “resting on” the fabric. Embedded. This means the fragments were pressed into the fibers of the fabric - forced into the weave of the shirt by impact, pressure or friction. Think of a splinter of glass that slices into a shirt during an accident. The fragments found were about 1/8 inch by 1/16 inch. That’s about the size of: •A tiny wood splinter •A coarse grain of sand •A fragment of crushed red pepper •The leg of a small ant •A piece of cracked nail or shell Imagine trying to manually embed something that small into a shirt. Not tape it on. Not drop it into a pocket. Physically force it into the threads of a cotton shirt. You’d need tools, magnification, and a steady hand and still probably couldn’t do it convincingly without damaging the fabric or leaving evidence. So there’s really only one explanation - those fragments were embedded during an actual, forceful impact. John O’Keefe wasn’t planted in the snow by his friends that night. He was hit and those taillight fragments were driven into his clothing by the force of that collision.

Jamz

32,452 次观看 • 1 年前

Rep. Smith: The second video, which they have not released, shows the remains of that boat. The boat had been broken in half and they were clinging to what remained of it. They were not armed. They did not have any communications devices. And the idea that the cocaine had survived, there was no evidence of that. If the public can see that video, they're going to be every bit as troubled as I am. Why do you think they won't release this one? Because it looks bad for them.
2:35

Rep. Smith: The second video, which they have not released, shows the remains of that boat. The boat had been broken in half and they were clinging to what remained of it. They were not armed. They did not have any communications devices. And the idea that the cocaine had survived, there was no evidence of that. If the public can see that video, they're going to be every bit as troubled as I am. Why do you think they won't release this one? Because it looks bad for them.

FactPost

55,866 次观看 • 7 个月前

FKR continues to push the narrative that Karen Read’s passenger side taillight was intact in the picture attached and simply covered by snow. But thankfully Karen’s own father is here to help clear things up for them: This image is from a wellness check that took place at 1 Meadows around 8 AM on the morning of January 29, 2022. And here’s Bill Read himself confirming that yes, Karen’s taillight was already broken while her car was parked in the driveway at 1 Meadows WELL BEFORE the Massachusetts State Police ever took custody of her Lexus. ARCCA has stated that Karen Read bumping John O’Keefe’s vehicle around 5AM that morning at the speed she did would NOT have caused that damage to her taillight. So when did the damage occur? Facts matter. Just stop it.
0:59

FKR continues to push the narrative that Karen Read’s passenger side taillight was intact in the picture attached and simply covered by snow. But thankfully Karen’s own father is here to help clear things up for them: This image is from a wellness check that took place at 1 Meadows around 8 AM on the morning of January 29, 2022. And here’s Bill Read himself confirming that yes, Karen’s taillight was already broken while her car was parked in the driveway at 1 Meadows WELL BEFORE the Massachusetts State Police ever took custody of her Lexus. ARCCA has stated that Karen Read bumping John O’Keefe’s vehicle around 5AM that morning at the speed she did would NOT have caused that damage to her taillight. So when did the damage occur? Facts matter. Just stop it.

Jamz

30,271 次观看 • 1 年前

The shattered glass that was on the bumper was consistent with the one piece of glass that Proctor says he found in the road. That glass did NOT match the cocktail glass or the broken pieces of the cocktail glass found next to John. So where did the extra mystery glass from the bumper and the road come from?
1:32

The shattered glass that was on the bumper was consistent with the one piece of glass that Proctor says he found in the road. That glass did NOT match the cocktail glass or the broken pieces of the cocktail glass found next to John. So where did the extra mystery glass from the bumper and the road come from?

The Trial Channel

25,813 次观看 • 6 个月前

#KarenReadTrial Canton PD’s Lt. Paul Gallagher just testified that CPD removed #KarenRead’s taillight, admitting they broke and shattered it in the process. 👇🏼 OH MY GOD! Alan Jackson: “Canton Police Department was allowed to facilitate the removal of that light?” Lt. Paul Gallagher: “Yes” Alan Jackson: “And during the course of the removal of that light, a taillight was broken. Correct?” Lt. Paul Gallagher: “That’s correct” Alan Jackson: “And shattered?” Lt. Paul Gallagher: “Yes” —————— I’m speechless. 😱 Attorney Alan Jackson just got a Canton Police Officer to admit that THEY, Canton Police Department, broke and shattered Karen Read’s taillight! It appears Lt. Paul Gallagher realizes he messed up (toward the end). Gallagher tried a poker face once he realized what he’d just done. But it was too late. The truth is out. #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #CantonCoverup #JohnOKeefe #PoliceCorruption #LIARS
1:31

#KarenReadTrial Canton PD’s Lt. Paul Gallagher just testified that CPD removed #KarenRead’s taillight, admitting they broke and shattered it in the process. 👇🏼 OH MY GOD! Alan Jackson: “Canton Police Department was allowed to facilitate the removal of that light?” Lt. Paul Gallagher: “Yes” Alan Jackson: “And during the course of the removal of that light, a taillight was broken. Correct?” Lt. Paul Gallagher: “That’s correct” Alan Jackson: “And shattered?” Lt. Paul Gallagher: “Yes” —————— I’m speechless. 😱 Attorney Alan Jackson just got a Canton Police Officer to admit that THEY, Canton Police Department, broke and shattered Karen Read’s taillight! It appears Lt. Paul Gallagher realizes he messed up (toward the end). Gallagher tried a poker face once he realized what he’d just done. But it was too late. The truth is out. #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #CantonCoverup #JohnOKeefe #PoliceCorruption #LIARS

Olivia

232,862 次观看 • 2 年前

Who inverted the new Karen Read footage from Pequitside Farm in Canton? My last post caused some confusion because I uploaded the clip exactly as it was produced by the DA’s office. That led to questions: which taillight are we looking at? Is the research wrong? Did I flip it? Am I losing it? 😅 Here’s the thing.. when reviewing new evidence, we have to anchor ourselves in what we already know. It’s easy to default to the simplest explanation (in this case, assuming the visible taillight is the driver’s side). But at this point, taking anything from the Norfolk County DA’s office at face value would be naïve. From the timeline we know: 🔹️ Kerry Roberts was driving her SUV behind Jen McCabe and Karen Read as they left Jen’s house heading toward John’s. 🔹️ Kerry was not present when Karen initially left John’s home earlier. 🔹️ Pequitside Farm sits on the right-hand side of the road when traveling from Jen’s to John’s. 🔹️ The camera is positioned on the right side of the road. If the camera is on the right, the taillight closest to it is the passenger-side taillight.. not the driver’s side. Which means the undamaged taillight we see closest to the camera is the very same taillight later photographed as obliterated in MSP evidence photos. So why does the clip make it look like we’re viewing the driver’s side? When looking at the original supplied footage, the “Do Not Enter” sign is backwards. So either we’re dealing with yet another mysteriously inverted camera… or the footage was flipped. The most important takeaway here isn’t left vs. right. It’s that Karen Read’s taillight is visibly intact. Not shattered. Not obliterated. Which brings us to the real question. If it wasn’t broken there, then who broke it?
0:49

Who inverted the new Karen Read footage from Pequitside Farm in Canton? My last post caused some confusion because I uploaded the clip exactly as it was produced by the DA’s office. That led to questions: which taillight are we looking at? Is the research wrong? Did I flip it? Am I losing it? 😅 Here’s the thing.. when reviewing new evidence, we have to anchor ourselves in what we already know. It’s easy to default to the simplest explanation (in this case, assuming the visible taillight is the driver’s side). But at this point, taking anything from the Norfolk County DA’s office at face value would be naïve. From the timeline we know: 🔹️ Kerry Roberts was driving her SUV behind Jen McCabe and Karen Read as they left Jen’s house heading toward John’s. 🔹️ Kerry was not present when Karen initially left John’s home earlier. 🔹️ Pequitside Farm sits on the right-hand side of the road when traveling from Jen’s to John’s. 🔹️ The camera is positioned on the right side of the road. If the camera is on the right, the taillight closest to it is the passenger-side taillight.. not the driver’s side. Which means the undamaged taillight we see closest to the camera is the very same taillight later photographed as obliterated in MSP evidence photos. So why does the clip make it look like we’re viewing the driver’s side? When looking at the original supplied footage, the “Do Not Enter” sign is backwards. So either we’re dealing with yet another mysteriously inverted camera… or the footage was flipped. The most important takeaway here isn’t left vs. right. It’s that Karen Read’s taillight is visibly intact. Not shattered. Not obliterated. Which brings us to the real question. If it wasn’t broken there, then who broke it?

BoozeyBeauty

43,474 次观看 • 5 个月前

Microscopic pieces of red plastic weren’t just on John O’Keefe’s shirt. They were embedded in it. Not casually resting on the surface. Not something that could be brushed off. Embedded. So deeply they had to be picked out with an instrument. And those tiny fragments? Consistent with the shattered taillight from Karen Read’s car. This isn’t speculation. This isn't a butt dial or a home that was sold. It’s physical evidence.
2:29

Microscopic pieces of red plastic weren’t just on John O’Keefe’s shirt. They were embedded in it. Not casually resting on the surface. Not something that could be brushed off. Embedded. So deeply they had to be picked out with an instrument. And those tiny fragments? Consistent with the shattered taillight from Karen Read’s car. This isn’t speculation. This isn't a butt dial or a home that was sold. It’s physical evidence.

Jamz

12,863 次观看 • 1 年前

I’ve been thinking about this moment all weekend; absolute perfection by Alan Jackson 🚨 Bev’s stutter when AJ says he wants to enter it into evidence 🚨 Pleading with her eyes at Hank to object and the disappointment when he doesn’t 🚨 The way she does NOT want that taillight in AJ’s hands, and the way he takes it anyways 🚨 THE KNOCK I think this could make a huge difference for jurors. To be able to have that hard polycarbonate in the room while deliberating, it’s a lot harder to imagine a scenario where John is hit and cut up by that taillight but not bruised.
0:20

I’ve been thinking about this moment all weekend; absolute perfection by Alan Jackson 🚨 Bev’s stutter when AJ says he wants to enter it into evidence 🚨 Pleading with her eyes at Hank to object and the disappointment when he doesn’t 🚨 The way she does NOT want that taillight in AJ’s hands, and the way he takes it anyways 🚨 THE KNOCK I think this could make a huge difference for jurors. To be able to have that hard polycarbonate in the room while deliberating, it’s a lot harder to imagine a scenario where John is hit and cut up by that taillight but not bruised.

Emily See

104,885 次观看 • 1 年前

Ummmmm well… That’s weird Attorney Brennan 🤨 “Debris” marked as evidence 7-18.18 was collected from BOTH the orange t shirt and gray long sleeve hoodie by Maureen Hartnett. It was a scraping from both shirts after delivered to MA crime lab on March 14th by Trooper Proctor. It was never noted as: imbedded, littered, or even asserted that the apparent red/clear plastic was a match to KRs Lexus taillight! 🤯 Why did you tell Dr. Marie Russell at her Daubert hearing 1/7 that a criminalistics report stated “shards from that taillight were littered IN his sweater” while motioning to your right arm.. #LyingHank 🫣 #KarenRead #CommonwealthCorruption
0:46

Ummmmm well… That’s weird Attorney Brennan 🤨 “Debris” marked as evidence 7-18.18 was collected from BOTH the orange t shirt and gray long sleeve hoodie by Maureen Hartnett. It was a scraping from both shirts after delivered to MA crime lab on March 14th by Trooper Proctor. It was never noted as: imbedded, littered, or even asserted that the apparent red/clear plastic was a match to KRs Lexus taillight! 🤯 Why did you tell Dr. Marie Russell at her Daubert hearing 1/7 that a criminalistics report stated “shards from that taillight were littered IN his sweater” while motioning to your right arm.. #LyingHank 🫣 #KarenRead #CommonwealthCorruption

Nurse_Kim

18,912 次观看 • 1 年前

Polis: Some misunderstood the crime. Thought it had something to do with the 2020 election when the crime had zero to do with that. Collins: You don't think had Trump not disputed the 2020 election, had Mike Lindell not become this famous figure on TV disputing the election results in 2020, that what happened in 2021 in Mesa county would have happened? Polis: This was a clerk that certified the results. There was not an issue there. Collins: You just think that those are totally separate? That this would have still occurred even if 2020 never happened with a major election dispute? Polis: You'd have to have her on to talk about her motivation. Do I think that she was egged on or encouraged in her illegal acts by people like Mike Lindell, perhaps even the president of the United States? It's certainly conjecture, but it's certainly possible. I don't know how she came to hold her beliefs
2:00

Polis: Some misunderstood the crime. Thought it had something to do with the 2020 election when the crime had zero to do with that. Collins: You don't think had Trump not disputed the 2020 election, had Mike Lindell not become this famous figure on TV disputing the election results in 2020, that what happened in 2021 in Mesa county would have happened? Polis: This was a clerk that certified the results. There was not an issue there. Collins: You just think that those are totally separate? That this would have still occurred even if 2020 never happened with a major election dispute? Polis: You'd have to have her on to talk about her motivation. Do I think that she was egged on or encouraged in her illegal acts by people like Mike Lindell, perhaps even the president of the United States? It's certainly conjecture, but it's certainly possible. I don't know how she came to hold her beliefs

Acyn

53,933 次观看 • 2 个月前