Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

This video is absolutely horrifying and enraging. According to reports, in Doranda, a Mercedes-Benz car rammed into a biker. When the injured youth demanded compensation, the driver didn’t stop instead, he dragged the victim for several kilometers. The most shocking part? The young man was clinging to the car’s...

105,296 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Scott Jennings hits a former NYPD Lieutenant with a BRUTAL dose of common sense about the shooting in Minneapolis. As Darrin Porcher attempted use his law enforcement background to question the ICE officer’s actions, Scott Jennings delivered the kind of plainspoken truth the media doesn’t want to hear. He spelled out the ABCs of what actually happened on the ground for the entire CNN panel. PORCHER: “Procedurally, this is not sound, but from a law perspective, it can be somewhat questionable.” Then Jennings laid out the facts: JENNINGS: “I mean, contrary to what I heard out here the other day, this person was not a random passerby, who just happened to be driving through her neighborhood.” “This person is part of a group of people who form convoys to interfere with federal law enforcement operations. They drive convoys of cars into active law enforcement situations.” “They interfere with ongoing law enforcement activity. This is a felony to do that, A.” “B, this person had been following ICE around all day. Apparently according to witnesses, now, according to further reporting.” “C, they didn’t follow lawful commands to stop, get out of the car.” “D, they accelerated a car into the officer. It clearly hit the officer.” “I don’t understand how you could watch this video and all the other videos that have come out and not come to the conclusion that this is an unfortunate, tragic situation that was caused by someone, the person driving the vehicle, using extraordinarily poor judgment from top to bottom.” “Doesn’t make me happy. I don’t like it, I hate this, I don’t like it when U.S. Citizens or anyone dies in any kind of engagement with law enforcement like this, but this person exercised EXTREMELY poor judgment and put themselves in harm’s way, probably committing a felony in the process.” “And this is the result.”

Overton

856,246 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

This dude unloads on cop in a who is in the right type situation. We are in Adam's county PA where a Law Enforcement Ranger pulls over a man because he is saying he could not see his tag. By the officers own admission he was able to see the tag as he got closer but proceeded with the stop. As per usual the officer asks for ID and the man in truck went to work on this officer telling him this is an illegal stop as no crime has been committed so he is not required to provide ID. Through out the interaction he asks the officer if he is free to go and the officer doubles down on detainment. However at the same time when asked the officer was not able to articulate a crime. The man also asked for a sergeant and the officer never compiled by getting a supervisor on scene which honestly would have been the best move. There are two ways to look at this interaction. The eyes of the officer: The officer calmly maintains that the traffic stop is entirely lawful. In the United States, law enforcement needs reasonable suspicion to initiate a traffic stop. An obscured license plate or illegally dark window tint satisfies that standard in almost every jurisdiction. Furthermore, once a lawful traffic stop is initiated, a driver is legally required to produce a valid driver's license, proof of insurance, and vehicle registration. The driver's perspective: The driver claims that his tags are legit and the officer was able to see that when he ran them. He argues that because the ranger claimed at first he could not see the tags but now he can as he approached the vehicle. Since the officer admitted he can now see the tags and there is no problem with the tags, the initial stop was "erroneous" and constitutes an illegal search and seizure. He also details a personal grievance with local law enforcement, claiming a local district attorney and police officers have been "terrorizing" him. What is your take on this stop? Was this a case of an officer error where with the cop trying to save face by digging for a reason for the stop, or was this a legal stop and this officer deserves praise for staying calm while dealing with this man's outbursts? Share your thoughts below.

Giggling Ganon

193,729 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat