Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

This video is controversial but I’d like to explore its physics in this thread As I see it the potential energy of the nails convert to kinetic energy so it transfers energy all through the box the entropy of the system is increased 1/🧵

17,380,337 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von Science girl
Science girlvor 3 Jahren

These nails aligned as objects always seek a minimum energy state, (a stable state) because of the first and second laws of thermodynamics: energy conservation and entropy increase. Regarding controversy about it being reversed i have seen it replicated and also ….2/🧵

Profilbild von Science girl
Science girlvor 3 Jahren

3/🧵when it’s reversed, it’s very much different There is always a doubt with unsourced visuals, but I find it interesting and wanted to explore the reasoning behind why it may work

Profilbild von Olive The Attention
Olive The Attentionvor 3 Jahren

I dunno, but it looks like he nailed it.

Profilbild von hyper❌hope
hyper❌hopevor 3 Jahren

My take . It’s a reversed video 🙃

Profilbild von Cesar Abeid
Cesar Abeidvor 3 Jahren

My take: When the nails are lined up, that’s the position that makes them all closer to the bottom. This means a minimum potential energy state for all nails as a group. They can’t get there on their own though, so the shaking offers an element of chaos that, given enough time, will result in the state with the least amount of potential energy. Sure entropy is increased, but this is not a closed system.

Profilbild von PosterSpy.com
PosterSpy.comvor 3 Jahren

Or the video is just in reverse...

Profilbild von MW
MWvor 3 Jahren

Reverse. Adding energy to instability never leads to stability.

Profilbild von Claus DB
Claus DBvor 3 Jahren

In nail factories they use a vibrating table to fit the nails in cardboard boxes.

Profilbild von A Cerbic
A Cerbicvor 3 Jahren

For those thinking the video is reversed, here's a replication:

Profilbild von Donald Farmer 🙂
Donald Farmer 🙂vor 3 Jahren

I kinda view it as brownian motion that biases in a vertical direction. Once a nail falls into the valley between two nails below it, it takes a lot of energy to move it out of place. So the walls help aline in horizontal plane, gravity in vertical plane

Ähnliche Videos

Free Energy Announcement Free Energy, otherwise known as Overunity is 100% real. The devices exist already. I have been told exactly how an operational device works. I signed an NDA so I won't be able to disclose specifics. Instead, I want to explain the concepts so everyone understands how it is possible. Overunity means Coefficient of Performance (CoP) greater than 1. More energy coming out of the device than is being locally put into it. This allows for a system that can perpetually produce energy without being plugged in. Many will claim this breaks the first and second laws of thermodynamics. The reason it doesn't break the second law is similar to a windmill or solar panel. The system is open to the Aether (quantum fluctuations) in the same way those systems are open to nature. The first law of thermodynamics says energy cannot be created or destroyed. Solar and wind cannot output more energy than they take because the inputs are limited, but the Aether represents potentially unlimited additional energy input. This is how an Overunity system produces CoP greater 1. 'Free Energy' is a misnomer. It means that the potential energy accessed is unlimited, but it does not mean that the cost of extracting it is zero. The materials to produce an Overunity device are currently expensive, as is the labor to build it. When these devices become more efficient to produce, the cost will drop. The benefits of Overunity include; 1. Energy independence from energy companies 2. The ability to live off the grid 3. No loss of power when the grid fails 4. Green energy with no pollution 5. Cost savings over time from high energy bills The downsides of Overunity include; 1. Large initial device cost 2. Disbelief I hope this information is as exciting to you as it is to me. I will try to answer any questions I can in the comments below. I am also willing to appear on shows and podcasts to discuss these concepts with the public. There are more announcements to come in the near future. Thank you.

Ashton Forbes

390,079 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Ever hear Albert Einstein’s voice? He’s him explaining his formula, E=mc² It is probably the most famous formula in the world, but what exactly does it mean? Let's start by defining each letter in the formula: E = Energy M = Mass C = Speed of light (a very large number) If we were to read the formula, we would say, "Energy equals mass times the speed of light squared." The formula itself is rather simple in that it essentially says that energy and mass are different forms of the same thing; they are interchangeable. So are you saying a beam of light and a banana are different forms of the same thing? Yes, in our head, this may not make sense, but it does in nature. This discovery was groundbreaking at the time because people had previously believed that energy could only be created by kinetic or potential energy. You can increase kinetic energy by accelerating your car. You can increase potential energy by stretching a rubber band. Einstein demonstrated that there was a third form, which is that things have energy because they simply exist. Ok, so why is mass multiplied by the speed of light? Whenever you are converting mass to pure energy, it is by nature moving at the speed of light. Pure energy is an electromagnetic radiation, which travels at 186,000 miles/sec (300,000 km/sec). Ok, cool, but why is the speed of light squared? This again has to do with the nature of energy. If an object is moving twice as fast as another object, it does not have twice as much energy. Rather, it has four times as much energy. Hence, the speed of light is squared, which comes out to a very big number. C^2 is the conversion factor from mass to energy. The bottom line is that even small objects have an immense amount of energy. Through the process of nuclear fusion/fission via nuclear power plants, we can harness some of this energy. In the atomic bomb that destroyed the city of Hiroshima, there was about 700 milligrams (equivalent to the weight of 1/3 of a dime) of uranium which was converted to energy that destroyed everything within a 1-mile (1.6 km) blast radius.

Historic Vids

2,424,168 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren