正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

This video keeps popping up in my feed. Let me explain: the EU doesn't have a common army, nor an integrated command-and-control structure. Simply adding up military equipment means nothing. For example, during ww2, France had on paper far more equipment than Nazi Germany, yet it was still defeated....

11,022 次观看 • 7 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Will Donald Trump annex Greenland? Time will tell. A few thoughts: 🇬🇱 Greenland rightfully belongs to Denmark – the settled parts of it have been in Viking hands for a thousand years. There is no question about this. 🇩🇰 However, Denmark is not strong enough to maintain its claim on it. 🇺🇸 It makes perfect sense for the US to want to control Greenland (the Panama Canal, too, for that matter). In fact, it would be a bad mistake on their part to leave it up for grabs – lest China claims it, for example. 🇪🇺 Denmark is not strong enough on its own. Just as Sweden is not strong enough on its own. The same can be said about former titans such as France and Germany. A united and strong Europe is needed if we are to be able to assert ourselves against other entities. In order to become strong again, the primary objective for European countries is, of course, to enact a large-scale remigration process. European countries are weak because of mass immigration from the Third World (the same is true for the US). 🇪🇺🤝🇺🇸 The optimal scenario is, of course, a close alliance between the EU and the US. However, something to keep in mind is that even though Trump might be a good man (or at least good for Americans), there is a significant risk that coming American regimes will be bad for Whites in the US as well as for Europeans in Europe. ⚜️The EU as we know it today is an abomination. This does not mean that each European country should go its own way. It means that we need good people in Brussels and Strasbourg who can transform the EU into a powerful actor. Exciting times ahead. Francis Fukuyama was wrong, we have not reached the end of history. Onwards!

The Golden One

172,591 次观看 • 1 年前

Lavrov threatens Europe and Keith Kellogg over the project of a new European defence union with Ukraine. He said: “He [Kellogg] is now actively promoting the idea that a new military alliance should be created, and that Ukraine should not be brought into NATO, because, as they say, this has already been rejected both by President Trump and other members of his administration. And Kellogg, being also not a stranger in Washington, together with the European ‘grandees’, as they are called, is promoting the idea of creating a new military bloc with Ukraine as a member, and even not just a member, but as its leading participant […]” - Lavrov said. Lavrov is threatening Europe over militarisation and trying to drive a wedge between the White House and Europe. Moscow is very concerned by the fact that Ukraine is indeed being considered as a potential member of a European defense union. This was stated by Defence Commissioner Andrius Kubilius. Andrius Kubilius said that the European Commission is discussing an intergovernmental treaty to form a defence union and prepare the EU for independent defence, against the backdrop of the United States increasingly focusing on the Indo-Pacific region. The treaty is intended to strengthen the European Union’s role in defending Europe, while avoiding the recurring debate that defence is not an EU competence, but rather belongs to individual member states. The Commissioner also called for the creation of a new “real European defence union” involving the United Kingdom, Norway, and Ukraine. For this purpose, he suggested concluding a separate intergovernmental defence treaty, which could be modelled on the Schengen Agreement. The initiative to create a defence union involves not only legal formalisation, but also increased defence spending, expansion of production capacities, and stronger coordination between EU countries and close partners such as Ukraine, the UK, and Norway, which are expected to become members of the union. At the same time, defence policy would remain within the national competence of member states. 📹 CGTN

Anton Gerashchenko

137,411 次观看 • 3 个月前

French Army General and Chief of the Defence Staff Thierry Burkhard Chef d'état-major des armées: "Russia is a lasting threat. The war in Ukraine is existential for Russia. And it is determined to achieve what it has set as its goal, or at least what Putin has set as his goal, with the ultimate objective, in military terms, being to weaken Europe and dismantle NATO. That is Russia's goal, it is Putin's goal. To achieve it, through the war in Ukraine, it has reorganized itself quite quickly and effectively, setting up a war economy that is now running at full capacity. This war economy, I believe, is currently one of the key factors keeping the Russian economy afloat. And so, there is no reason - and even a kind of impossibility - to abruptly stop this. This means that Russia will continue to rearm at this pace. And so, despite the losses it is suffering, the incredible losses it is suffering, we estimate that by 2030, it will once again be a force that will pose a real threat to our borders on the eastern flank of Europe. It is clear that what is at stake in Ukraine is, on the one hand, the security of Europe, but I also think that it is, in fact, the place of European countries in the world, in tomorrow's world, in the world that we are shaping today. And if the outcome in Ukraine were a Russian victory and a Ukrainian defeat, we often say that would be a Western defeat, I think that it would be, and is increasingly becoming, due to the American stance, something that would be a real European defeat. And this European defeat is something we would have to endure and absorb. So, Ukraine, of course, must be defended as such. And I think that defending Ukraine is also, in a way, about how we see ourselves and what we are willing to do to shape Europe as it needs to be in the future, and live in today's world. And you understand that, if that doesn't happen - to use an image that has already been used - we would become something like herbivores in a world of carnivores. And that's not a very comfortable position — being at the bottom of the food chain. So for that reason, we must remain extremely vigilant."

Anton Gerashchenko

66,283 次观看 • 1 年前