正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

This week highlighted a real problem with free-speech in the Welsh Parliament. When you have the Presiding Officer telling elected members they can't use language 'that has the potential to inflame debate', you don't have debate at all. Parliaments are exactly where difficult debates should be had, but these...

11,954 次观看 • 26 天前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Trump has agreed to debate Harris on September 4th on Fox. There was no mention of RFK Jr. It’s critical whether you’re a Republican, Democrat, RFK, or other third party voter, that we advocate for RFK to be on that stage. A heavy majority of Americans agree that RFK should have a spot in the debate. 7/10 Americans wanted him on the stage during the last debate, that number is no doubt equal or larger this debate. After the disastrous first debate with Trump/Biden on CNN, it is hard to argue that if RFK were on the stage that day that he could have had a chance to be polling at levels near Trump/Harris currently. It does not mean that he would be, but 100% a rational conclusion that he could be. Americans need someone on the stage to ask difficult questions that the moderators are unwilling to bring up because of the unwritten rules of hosting presidential debates. If it is a debate only between Trump/Harris, Trump will spew his talking points about Harris’s disastrous past in politics, and Harris will spew her talking points of Trump being a racist and threat to Democracy. In reality Americans don’t want to hear these talking points anymore, we already get it at nausea everyday through social media. What America truly deserves is a presidential debate where Trump, Harris, RFK, Stein, West, and Oliver are on the stage but it’s a sad truth that at first we just need to fight to try and get a third candidate on the stage before 6.

End Tribalism in Politics

60,444 次观看 • 1 年前

Do you understand anon? do u know how angry so many men of the US are rn? Bc to them, this didn't start with the train girl or today bc they lost their debate bro. "Debate me / change my mind" culture started on college campuses about 10 years ago bc a lot of young men were being driven crazy bc they didn't feel like they were being heard or that they could speak, they were quite literally being yelled at, cancelled, shoo'ed away for speaking against "woke" (which is why this became such a huge catch all phrase) the "debate me" guys were/are hugely important to many young men in this country because they can have dialogue without violence, they also observed that the lockstep censorship (which don't even start, was a thing) also led them to form entire orgs to protect their ability to do so. you probably think this will just die down anon, but it won't, it's a continuation of escalation that already started, but you were too busy collecting LABUBUs and calling everyone bigots to notice it. The slaughter (and celebration) of the debate bro's death will have a lot of consequences, some u will see right away some u won't, I know he did not call for violence or extermination of others and was pro 2A, this was the guy that was fairly moderate all things considered. So how the men are seeing it (from what they're saying) is that the other "side" is done talking and intent on violence. It doesn't even seem like a matter of if something will happen but a matter of when. Jordan Peterson (my benzo queen) tried to warn you but u didn't listen bc u wanted to make Kermit the frog memes. all in all anon, you probably would prefer to have the debate me bros who were not doing anything violent, rather than opening up the door bc this is only where it starts. I am always an advocate of dialogue myself, but I think at this point anon, you don't realize the demons you unleashed.

special k | CEO of stressed out era

18,539 次观看 • 10 个月前