正在加载视频...
视频加载失败
This weekend I shared a post voicing my concerns about the far left. The response has been overwhelming. Leaders in both parties called to tell me the same thing: this stuff has gone too far. To be clear: I'm a progressive Democrat. My whole life, I've wanted to see... show more
1,098,382 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)
34 条评论
everyone knows you are a puppet slave of Zionist Jews btw. I know you know this, so I'm just reaffirming it again. We all know it. That blue pin you wear is your slave branding. You fucking degenerate lowlife cunt scum. We all see you:
Remember when you want on tv and joked about children being blown up in Gaza? You are a piece of shit, an israeli dog
Van Jones after meeting with Israelis
Van Jones just admitted the Democratic Party has been hijacked by extremists, but somehow still wants credit for discovering the wreckage after years of helping drive the car. He now says abolishing police, emptying prisons, erasing borders, excusing Hamas, and abandoning vulnerable communities is “regressive.” Correct. But where was this courage when conservatives were warning about the same ideas? We were called hateful, ignorant, dangerous, and extreme. Now that these policies are consuming the Democratic Party from within, suddenly Van Jones wants a distinction between “progressive” and “regressive.” No. This is the harvest of what your party planted, defended, financed, normalized, and imposed on American cities. The issue is not that the Democratic Party was hijacked. The issue is that its leaders opened the door, handed over the keys, and attacked everyone who warned them. Now the outcomes are undeniable. #AStoneGroove #SilentMajoritySpeaks
So a leftists wanting to distance the party from a foreign country and war crimes is a deal-breaker, while the party and your wing welcome Never Trump Republicans with the red-carpet treatment. There's nothing Progressive about supporting apartheid and genocide.
Oh look there’s a Dem trying to put the toothpaste back in the tube
Van, Republican elected officials, with one or two exceptions, have stood strong against terror, defund the police, open borders, crime, while standing w Israel and loudly condemning the Antisemitism and Marxism consuming Democrats. We are not a shell. We are sanity.
Too late, Mr. Jones. Democrats like me were warning Dems like you about this seditious, deadly Marxist movement years ago. You laughed. Mocked. Ignored. We left the party and now you’re left with Frankenstein. We tried to warn you… ⬇️
Your party leadership is silent about this. Piker..an avowed Communist is literally sporting a Mao Suit. This creep and his comrades are radicalizing our youth. And the party does nothing because they want votes.
@TheJewishAlly With all due respect Republican party is not a shell of itself. We have majority of senate, congress, and the presidency. Tons of young people are discovering conservative philosophy. And we don't elect ppl who hate America. The Democratic party is eating itself.
You're full of it. This is just fearmongering and guilt by association dressed up as concern for progressives. If you care about progressive values, affordability and healthcare, talk about those issues instead of inventing boogeymen to attack.
Van Jones: *says that the Palestinian babies israel murdered are part of a “disinformation campaign” by Iran and Qatar* Van Jones: “I’m a progressive Democrat.”
Progressive Democrat? Here you were yucking it up with Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump.
Van Jones is a paid mouthpiece for the genocidal apartheid state of Israel. Van Jones is NOT progressive. And, as a Black man who supports the state that supported the imprisonment of Nelson Mandela and apartheid in South Africa, you ought to be ashamed of yourself.
Ignore this sell out. Van Jones is just doing his job of protecting special and corporate interests in the media. His handlers think he has sway among the black electorate but he is being left behind. Loool
Why aren’t you calling out Mamdani? He is DSA. You call out Chevalier’s far left, radical agenda — which is congruent with Mamdani’s. Why are you concerned about her but not the head of the snake? Why are you protecting the biggest threat that NYC has ever faced?
The line is Israel. You are a coward. Everything else is a talking point.
This is about Israel and we all know it. You're a disgrace that bends the knee to Jewish supremacy
Why doesn't the Democratic party remove and bar the DSA from using the Democratic line and party resources?
Respectfully, this has been happening for years. What's the difference between Bernie, the Squad, Mamdani and the super scary socialists? Nothing really. It's nice to finally see a temporary amount of mild pushback, but it feels like it's basically their party now?
you have conflicts of interest wrt to Israel don't you
Good for you @VanJones68 Long overdue! However, the Republican Party is hardly a shell of itself. We haven’t been hijacked by radicals We love the United States and want to protect it not completely change everything about it through radical dangerous anti-American policies
Van, unfortunately, I have been in the middle of this insanity this past week. You are speaking for me and so many others loudly, boldly, and with clarity. Thank you.
@marklevinshow Be careful. You’re right where I was before I got kicked out of most of my friends groups and swatted. You are no longer able to think for yourself in the Democratic Party.
@davidmdraiman Too late…….
Your party wasn’t hijacked. You guys ushered them in the door by allowing the most ridiculous claims to stand. You and others encouraged violent discourse and let outrageous accusations and falsehoods be promoted. I’m sorry but the culture of violence of the Left has no one to blame but themselves. Observe the atrocious disrespect you all have held for the President and the office of the President. Here is 2:20 minutes of encouraging it.
You created the beast.
This is like Dr. Frankenstein publicly coming out against the monster he created. And it’s hilarious.
What Van Jones fails to understand is that every policy he views as “progressive” is, in reality, regressive. Progressivism is a leftwing ideology and its values are the values of the primitive tribe.
You are not, and never have been, progressive.
Respectfully, you are trying to rewrite your own history. You sat silently while OBiden allowed the invasion of 20M illegals into the country. Now, you want to talk about affordability? We have 50 M illegals here, which you defended for decades You scoffed at the notion that there was illegals voting. You care about power and nothing else
Progressive means acceptance of all…you all are broken in every aspect. You called us racist for not accepting this 👇🏼 you made your bed, RIP
This you? 🧐
Hamas isa resistance fighting group that is legal under international law. International law say that an occupied country has every right to fight the occupier You just work for Zionist Jews that will not allow you to tell the truth you fucking disgrace.
![[WATCH] The question before the Court is short, and it is a question of law. When a political party has completed the Commission’s prescribed forms and uploaded its lists onto the Commission’s own system before the hour, has that party submitted its lists? The movement says it has. The Commission says it has not. That is a disagreement between a political party and a public institution about what a statute means, and this country built a specialist court for precisely that. The Electoral Court will decide it. The ANC will abide by what the courts decide. I say that now, before judgment, so that nobody need ask afterwards. I want to address the judgment the Electoral Court handed down on Friday in the matter of the UDF Party, because it has been reported as a blow to the ANC. The Court held that the Commission has no power to exempt one party from a deadline that binds all others. The African National Congress agrees with that. We have never asked for an exemption. We have never asked for an extension. We are not asking for one now. What the UDF asked for and what the ANC asks for are different things, and Friday’s judgment is the clearest statement yet of that difference. And to those who have warned the Commission against giving the ANC “preferential treatment”, I say this plainly. The ANC wants none. Whatever relief the Court grants, the movement has asked that it apply to every affected party on the same terms — to the forty-four other parties as much as to us. If the ANC succeeds, two thousand and ninety-three candidates who are not ours succeed with us. That is the only kind of relief this movement would accept. Now let me speak about the Electoral Commission again. The Electoral Commission is a Chapter Nine institution of our Constitution. The African National Congress, more than any other organisation in this country, argued for it, negotiated it and built it. Through seven national elections and six local elections, the ANC has accepted every substantive result the Commission has declared — including the result of 2024, which took from this movement the majority it had held for thirty years. We accepted it on the night. We did not go to a stage and call the Commission a thief. That record is who we are, and it is not for sale in a dispute over six councils. So let me be clear about what the ANC is doing and what it is not doing. The ANC is not attacking the Electoral Commission. The ANC disagrees with the Commission on a point of law, and it has taken that disagreement to the court that Parliament created to hear it. Disagreement in a court is how a democracy respects an institution. Disagreement on a stage, with slogans, is how a democracy weakens one. The movement has chosen the court, respectfully. There are parties in this country who have used this matter to relitigate their own grievances against the Commission. The ANC will not join them, and it will not be used by them. Where the Commission is attacked for doing its work, this movement will defend it, as it has always defended it. We have a responsibility to the institutions of this state that the Commission’s other critics do not carry, and we will carry it even while we are in court against it. And there is a responsibility on all of us that goes beyond this matter. Forty-five parties used one channel and had challenges. That is a fact about the channel, whatever the Court decides about the law. After this election the ANC will go to the Party Liaison Committee and propose, for every party, that the electronic route carry a receipt; that its final step be prescribed in regulation, published in the Gazette, where every party can read it, and not only in software; and that a party be able to see the record of what the Commission holds from it. Not so that the ANC is spared next time. So that no party, large or small, ever again stands where forty-five parties stand this morning. #ANCMediaBriefing #SGMbalulaSpeaks #LGE2026VoteANC](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2097277576167280865/amplify_video_thumb/2097277276069212160/img/NjNvlZsXjgqYzRem.jpg)
