Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Thomas Sowell explains how people can become so convinced by an ideal that even a tiny amount of supporting evidence feels sufficient. His broader warning is about people who start with the utopia they want and then look for evidence to justify it, while ignoring the laws, incentives and... show more

Thomas Sowell Quotes

1,396,244 subscribers

25,721 views • 6 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

1 Comments

Tobias Maximus6 days ago

@SantiagoAuFund Especially women

Related Videos

Thomas Sowell has spent decades warning about what happens when people put ideology ahead of the institutions, values and freedoms that made America successful. “People who hate America are running America. Sowell’s broader lesson is worth remembering: don’t just listen to what people say they want to achieve. Look at the ideas they believe in and the consequences those ideas produce.

Thomas Sowell has spent decades warning about what happens when people put ideology ahead of the institutions, values and freedoms that made America successful. “People who hate America are running America. Sowell’s broader lesson is worth remembering: don’t just listen to what people say they want to achieve. Look at the ideas they believe in and the consequences those ideas produce.

Thomas Sowell Quotes

18,063 views • 9 days ago

Thomas Sowell explains why he’s no friend to politics or politicians. His point is simple: politicians have incentives to tell people what they want to hear, while the consequences of their decisions are often paid by everyone else. Another reminder from Sowell to look past political promises and focus on incentives, consequences, and reality.

Thomas Sowell explains why he’s no friend to politics or politicians. His point is simple: politicians have incentives to tell people what they want to hear, while the consequences of their decisions are often paid by everyone else. Another reminder from Sowell to look past political promises and focus on incentives, consequences, and reality.

Thomas Sowell Quotes

33,806 views • 21 days ago

Thomas Sowell on how leftists tend to view those who disagree with them: “What they believe seems so obviously true that if you’re standing in the way of it, either you must be incredibly stupid, utterly uninformed, or simply dishonest.” “People like that find it very hard to believe that someone else could honestly, sincerely, and intelligently reach a different conclusion.” “They talk about how complex the world is, but it never seems to be complex enough that other people could’ve read the same evidence they looked at and come up with a different conclusion.”

Thomas Sowell on how leftists tend to view those who disagree with them: “What they believe seems so obviously true that if you’re standing in the way of it, either you must be incredibly stupid, utterly uninformed, or simply dishonest.” “People like that find it very hard to believe that someone else could honestly, sincerely, and intelligently reach a different conclusion.” “They talk about how complex the world is, but it never seems to be complex enough that other people could’ve read the same evidence they looked at and come up with a different conclusion.”

Thomas Sowell Daily

11,252 views • 2 months ago

There’s none so blind as those who will not see. You can place 100% solid evidence in front of certain people and, because it doesn’t fit their own narrative or world view, they simply refuse to accept it. Extreme types won’t even look at it. When I told journalist Isabel Oakeshott about the involuntary euthanasia of the vulnerable in UK care homes and hospitals, she told me she simply didn’t believe it. I sent her a link to my film ‘A Good Death?’ I doubt if she watched it. She reiterated her refusal to look at evidence in subsequent interviews. Refusing to look at evidence because you don’t want to let go of a preconceived notion is NOT journalism. It’s not even common sense. It’s frustrating to deal with these people and sad that they can’t see how utterly and wilfully ignorant they are.

There’s none so blind as those who will not see. You can place 100% solid evidence in front of certain people and, because it doesn’t fit their own narrative or world view, they simply refuse to accept it. Extreme types won’t even look at it. When I told journalist Isabel Oakeshott about the involuntary euthanasia of the vulnerable in UK care homes and hospitals, she told me she simply didn’t believe it. I sent her a link to my film ‘A Good Death?’ I doubt if she watched it. She reiterated her refusal to look at evidence in subsequent interviews. Refusing to look at evidence because you don’t want to let go of a preconceived notion is NOT journalism. It’s not even common sense. It’s frustrating to deal with these people and sad that they can’t see how utterly and wilfully ignorant they are.

Jacqui Deevoy

70,352 views • 1 year ago

Listen closely to this. When atheists say they need extra, really compelling evidence for the resurrection, they’re tacitly admitting that the evidence we already have would normally be totally sufficient. However, they feel the need to come up with an excuse for why it’s not enough in this **particular** case. In other words, they’re assuming naturalism is true, so now you have to meet a standard of evidence that overcomes their fundamental assumptions about how reality works. Guess who gets to set that standard? They do. Guess who decides if you’ve met it? They do. This is why when people ask Matt Dillahunty what it would take to convince him, he never answers the question… because that’s the point: nothing will. It’s a rigged game.

Listen closely to this. When atheists say they need extra, really compelling evidence for the resurrection, they’re tacitly admitting that the evidence we already have would normally be totally sufficient. However, they feel the need to come up with an excuse for why it’s not enough in this particular case. In other words, they’re assuming naturalism is true, so now you have to meet a standard of evidence that overcomes their fundamental assumptions about how reality works. Guess who gets to set that standard? They do. Guess who decides if you’ve met it? They do. This is why when people ask Matt Dillahunty what it would take to convince him, he never answers the question… because that’s the point: nothing will. It’s a rigged game.

Darwin to Jesus

44,014 views • 1 year ago

“So you people want my wife, who just gave birth a month ago, to start recording about 15 police officers that came to my house, so they can harm her? What about all the evidence I have been posting and providing to security operatives? What have they done with those ones?” — MC Okirika respond to people demanding video evidence after alleging that Nigerian police officers came to his house hours after he posted a video of a police officer allegedly holding weed in Cross River State.

“So you people want my wife, who just gave birth a month ago, to start recording about 15 police officers that came to my house, so they can harm her? What about all the evidence I have been posting and providing to security operatives? What have they done with those ones?” — MC Okirika respond to people demanding video evidence after alleging that Nigerian police officers came to his house hours after he posted a video of a police officer allegedly holding weed in Cross River State.

CHUKS 🍥

49,672 views • 4 months ago

I believe mass psychological manipulation is happening to the American people, and I want you to understand one of the mechanisms that can make it possible. It’s called identity-protective cognition. Once somebody can attach an idea to your identity, they no longer have to convince you that the idea is true. They can make you feel that questioning it means betraying your race, your family, your political tribe, your religion, your community, or the people you love. Now think about how dangerous that becomes. Because once your identity is involved, contradictory evidence doesn’t merely challenge an idea. It can feel like it challenges you. And any political party, corporation, media organization, activist movement, religious institution, or other group can potentially exploit that human vulnerability. Black, White, Republican, Democrat, Christian, atheist. Nobody gets some magical cognitive exemption. That’s what makes this so pernicious. The person being influenced may never recognize the influence because defending the belief feels exactly like defending themselves. So in this video, I want to show you the mechanism. And then I want you to ask yourself one uncomfortable question: How many things do I believe because I examined the evidence, and how many things do I believe because somebody convinced me that people like me are supposed to believe them? #AStoneGroove #SilentMajoritySpeaks Libs of TikTok End Wokeness

I believe mass psychological manipulation is happening to the American people, and I want you to understand one of the mechanisms that can make it possible. It’s called identity-protective cognition. Once somebody can attach an idea to your identity, they no longer have to convince you that the idea is true. They can make you feel that questioning it means betraying your race, your family, your political tribe, your religion, your community, or the people you love. Now think about how dangerous that becomes. Because once your identity is involved, contradictory evidence doesn’t merely challenge an idea. It can feel like it challenges you. And any political party, corporation, media organization, activist movement, religious institution, or other group can potentially exploit that human vulnerability. Black, White, Republican, Democrat, Christian, atheist. Nobody gets some magical cognitive exemption. That’s what makes this so pernicious. The person being influenced may never recognize the influence because defending the belief feels exactly like defending themselves. So in this video, I want to show you the mechanism. And then I want you to ask yourself one uncomfortable question: How many things do I believe because I examined the evidence, and how many things do I believe because somebody convinced me that people like me are supposed to believe them? #AStoneGroove #SilentMajoritySpeaks Libs of TikTok End Wokeness

A Gene Robinson

17,801 views • 1 month ago

Candace Owens says she’s going to file a report over a 92-person group chat. But where’s the evidence of a crime? Being added to a group chat isn’t proof of wrongdoing. Posting about a public figure isn’t proof of “obsessive derangement.” And if someone actually shared private information or engaged in criminal activity, show the evidence and take it to the proper authorities. And what about the double standard? Candace has spent months talking about the same people and issues, but suddenly when someone else talks a lot about her, it becomes evidence of obsession. And if the FBI is credible when they bring you a threat against your life, how can they suddenly become untrustworthy when their conclusions don’t fit your narrative? If there’s evidence, show it. If there isn’t, stop making accusations and calling them facts. I’m not going anywhere. I’m going to keep speaking the truth and defending people from claims that aren’t supported by evidence.

Candace Owens says she’s going to file a report over a 92-person group chat. But where’s the evidence of a crime? Being added to a group chat isn’t proof of wrongdoing. Posting about a public figure isn’t proof of “obsessive derangement.” And if someone actually shared private information or engaged in criminal activity, show the evidence and take it to the proper authorities. And what about the double standard? Candace has spent months talking about the same people and issues, but suddenly when someone else talks a lot about her, it becomes evidence of obsession. And if the FBI is credible when they bring you a threat against your life, how can they suddenly become untrustworthy when their conclusions don’t fit your narrative? If there’s evidence, show it. If there isn’t, stop making accusations and calling them facts. I’m not going anywhere. I’m going to keep speaking the truth and defending people from claims that aren’t supported by evidence.

Natalie Jean Beisner

10,896 views • 1 month ago

President Kagame on sports shaping countries’ economies in the future: It's not just the future. When you talk about, for example, the arena, the stadium, it's already happening. People are taking notice of that and counting and knowing that it has employed so many, it has brought in so much. And that interaction around people here and beyond, with the rest of the world, speaks volumes in terms of value. So it has already brought in a lot. And it's a question of growing that. And we also know that statistics show that even across Africa, in terms of sports, it's running into billions as to what sports can bring to the continent, tens of billions. I think what we do as leaders at different levels is to encourage people to be part of realizing that story and reaping the benefits. And it's happening. So it's no longer something you just listen to and think it is for others and not for you. Now people believe, they start by believing. And when they start by believing and see things happening, then they believe even more and get more involved. And, I mean, the sky is the limit.

President Kagame on sports shaping countries’ economies in the future: It's not just the future. When you talk about, for example, the arena, the stadium, it's already happening. People are taking notice of that and counting and knowing that it has employed so many, it has brought in so much. And that interaction around people here and beyond, with the rest of the world, speaks volumes in terms of value. So it has already brought in a lot. And it's a question of growing that. And we also know that statistics show that even across Africa, in terms of sports, it's running into billions as to what sports can bring to the continent, tens of billions. I think what we do as leaders at different levels is to encourage people to be part of realizing that story and reaping the benefits. And it's happening. So it's no longer something you just listen to and think it is for others and not for you. Now people believe, they start by believing. And when they start by believing and see things happening, then they believe even more and get more involved. And, I mean, the sky is the limit.

Presidency | Rwanda

68,782 views • 1 year ago

Bret Weinstein cuts straight to the chase: "We are going to have an endless battle in which those of us who see what we believe is clear evidence of some kind of election rigging or fraud are faced with indignation from a vast array of people portraying themselves as more rigorous and careful who say, 'Where is your evidence? Where exactly is your evidence that there was something wrong with this election?' And we are gonna be caught in the following predicament. No piece of evidence is sufficient to establish that case. And the sum total of all of the evidence contains true things and false things. So it is also no good. So the question is, can you logically deduce that something has gone wrong? I believe you can easily. Can you prove it? No. And not being able to prove it means that the election will proceed. It will be validated by all of the structures, including the courts. And that means that those who take on the power that derives from these elections will be the result of whatever process we just went through, whether it was an election that happened to be anomalous through organic means, or it was the result of some kind of fraud or election rigging. That is not an accident. That is not an accident. And the point that I wanna make primarily is the primary evidence against elections that look like this being organic is not actually in the trickle of evidence that we are actually able to see, the moment by moment vote count that does something strange during the night when some large tranche of ballots is suddenly counted or something like that. The evidence is in the structure of how the elections are actually carried out. These elections are designed to allow fraud that cannot be detected and will not be prosecuted. And that's really the thing that we must focus on." Bret Weinstein

Bret Weinstein cuts straight to the chase: "We are going to have an endless battle in which those of us who see what we believe is clear evidence of some kind of election rigging or fraud are faced with indignation from a vast array of people portraying themselves as more rigorous and careful who say, 'Where is your evidence? Where exactly is your evidence that there was something wrong with this election?' And we are gonna be caught in the following predicament. No piece of evidence is sufficient to establish that case. And the sum total of all of the evidence contains true things and false things. So it is also no good. So the question is, can you logically deduce that something has gone wrong? I believe you can easily. Can you prove it? No. And not being able to prove it means that the election will proceed. It will be validated by all of the structures, including the courts. And that means that those who take on the power that derives from these elections will be the result of whatever process we just went through, whether it was an election that happened to be anomalous through organic means, or it was the result of some kind of fraud or election rigging. That is not an accident. That is not an accident. And the point that I wanna make primarily is the primary evidence against elections that look like this being organic is not actually in the trickle of evidence that we are actually able to see, the moment by moment vote count that does something strange during the night when some large tranche of ballots is suddenly counted or something like that. The evidence is in the structure of how the elections are actually carried out. These elections are designed to allow fraud that cannot be detected and will not be prosecuted. And that's really the thing that we must focus on." Bret Weinstein

The DarkHorse Podcast

697,051 views • 3 months ago

Tomorrow, I’m going to break a very large story with a piece of evidence that I just found out about after midnight tonight. The piece of evidence I found is THE biggest piece of evidence I was given tonight is going to make some of you laugh, make some of you scared, make some of you blink and go speechless, and many other things. It will be after I get out of church.. With this story will come apologies to people who are owed an apology, and I will sincerely mean that. To the ones who called me a liar, who knew the truth and covered it up, and who took part in it - your nightmare has only begun, as I plan on naming you, and taking every legal action I can against you.

Tomorrow, I’m going to break a very large story with a piece of evidence that I just found out about after midnight tonight. The piece of evidence I found is THE biggest piece of evidence I was given tonight is going to make some of you laugh, make some of you scared, make some of you blink and go speechless, and many other things. It will be after I get out of church.. With this story will come apologies to people who are owed an apology, and I will sincerely mean that. To the ones who called me a liar, who knew the truth and covered it up, and who took part in it - your nightmare has only begun, as I plan on naming you, and taking every legal action I can against you.

Ryan Nichols Sr.

58,417 views • 4 months ago

It's amazing what evidence based policy can do. The evidence that the 20mph limit is working fantastic from the point of view of saving lives and saving the taxpayer money in Wales is overwhelming. You can be annoyed about it. You can be frustrated by it. But you can't argue that it isn't doing what it was supposed to do.

It's amazing what evidence based policy can do. The evidence that the 20mph limit is working fantastic from the point of view of saving lives and saving the taxpayer money in Wales is overwhelming. You can be annoyed about it. You can be frustrated by it. But you can't argue that it isn't doing what it was supposed to do.

Will Hayward

28,143 views • 1 year ago

Thomas Sowell has described the Communist Manifesto as political propaganda rather than an objective analysis of society. His broader criticism of Marxism is that political ideas should be judged by their real-world results, not simply by how appealing their promises sound. Sowell always pushes people to look past the rhetoric and examine the consequences.

Thomas Sowell has described the Communist Manifesto as political propaganda rather than an objective analysis of society. His broader criticism of Marxism is that political ideas should be judged by their real-world results, not simply by how appealing their promises sound. Sowell always pushes people to look past the rhetoric and examine the consequences.

Thomas Sowell Quotes

16,931 views • 11 days ago

The Republicans are the party of feelings over facts. Whatever they feel, is what they go with—regardless of whether or not there’s any supporting evidence. When it comes to the constitution and due process, it doesn’t work like that. We have a judicial system and legal processes for a reason, and you don’t just get to ignore it because of how you “feel”.

The Republicans are the party of feelings over facts. Whatever they feel, is what they go with—regardless of whether or not there’s any supporting evidence. When it comes to the constitution and due process, it doesn’t work like that. We have a judicial system and legal processes for a reason, and you don’t just get to ignore it because of how you “feel”.

Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett

63,132 views • 1 year ago

Mamdani: There are neighborhoods today where you can feel the absence of those who do not feel as if they can leave their homes any longer. And now, if New Yorkers want a leader like the governor that we have, who can look at that cruelty and name it for what it is, then they know that the choice is Governor Hochul. If they want a leader who looks at the cruelty of ICE and sees a playbook of what to deliver at an even greater extent in New York State, then that’s Bruce Blakeman. And I know what choice I would make, and I know that New Yorkers feel the same, and we are all standing here because we believe in the values and ideals that make us so proud to be New Yorkers. And then there are those who are willing to traffic in fearmongering, even if it means trampling upon those very ideals, and we will not stand for that.

Mamdani: There are neighborhoods today where you can feel the absence of those who do not feel as if they can leave their homes any longer. And now, if New Yorkers want a leader like the governor that we have, who can look at that cruelty and name it for what it is, then they know that the choice is Governor Hochul. If they want a leader who looks at the cruelty of ICE and sees a playbook of what to deliver at an even greater extent in New York State, then that’s Bruce Blakeman. And I know what choice I would make, and I know that New Yorkers feel the same, and we are all standing here because we believe in the values and ideals that make us so proud to be New Yorkers. And then there are those who are willing to traffic in fearmongering, even if it means trampling upon those very ideals, and we will not stand for that.

Acyn

98,570 views • 1 month ago

There is no more time left to sugar coat anything. Most people, even unbelievers can FEEL something is wrong and we need to USE that to talk about what is going on. We need to be talking about the reality of hell. About the reality of eternity separated from God. About Satan, demons and the demonic realm. About the spiritual warfare we are in because we are now in a period of time they can see EVIDENCE of it when they look outside. Get right with Jesus. He died for you, took your place on the cross so that through the blood that He shed, you can spend eternity in the presence of God Almighty.

There is no more time left to sugar coat anything. Most people, even unbelievers can FEEL something is wrong and we need to USE that to talk about what is going on. We need to be talking about the reality of hell. About the reality of eternity separated from God. About Satan, demons and the demonic realm. About the spiritual warfare we are in because we are now in a period of time they can see EVIDENCE of it when they look outside. Get right with Jesus. He died for you, took your place on the cross so that through the blood that He shed, you can spend eternity in the presence of God Almighty.

Ashley Hays

32,790 views • 9 months ago

Neuroscientist Dr Julia Mossbridge states that telepathy is real and they have gathered evidence to show it. Dr Mossbridge goes onto say that telepathy being real isn’t the most interesting thing as it can already be explained with entanglement and quantum physics. What interests her the most is that there seems to be 2 types of telepathy. Evidence for “the hill” has also been confirmed. A documentary showing the trials and evidence is expected for 2026.

Neuroscientist Dr Julia Mossbridge states that telepathy is real and they have gathered evidence to show it. Dr Mossbridge goes onto say that telepathy being real isn’t the most interesting thing as it can already be explained with entanglement and quantum physics. What interests her the most is that there seems to be 2 types of telepathy. Evidence for “the hill” has also been confirmed. A documentary showing the trials and evidence is expected for 2026.

👽 (Ruby) 👽

33,816 views • 1 year ago

Who Won? Elon Musk Debates Don Lemon Over the Impact of DEI Programs Lemon repeatedly said, “There’s no evidence” that DEI programs are lowering medical standards, a comment Elon Musk believes is a “false statement.” Who is right? Musk calls on Community Notes to settle the score. LEMON: “There was a repost of Ben Shapiro that you claim that DEI is killing people. Specifically, you point to medicine. You claim that DEI programs are putting people at risk. Do you really believe this to be true? And what evidence do you have to support it?” MUSK: “What I was referring to there was that if we lower the standards for doctors, if the test for a doctor is lowered, then the probability of them making a mistake and killing someone is obviously going to be higher.” LEMON: “Wait, say that again. I’m not sure I understand what you said. I want to make sure I understand what you’re saying.” MUSK: “Yes. If the status for passing medical exams and becoming a doctor, especially something like a surgeon, if the standards are lowered, then the probability that the surgeon will make a mistake is higher. They’re making mistakes in their exam. They may make mistakes with people — and that may result in people dying.” LEMON: “What evidence do you have, though, that they’re lowering the standards? There is no evidence of that.” MUSK: “I believe there is.” LEMON: “There’s no evidence of that, Elon. What is the evidence?” MUSK: “I believe they have literally lowered the standards at Duke University, and that is what the article was referring to. You are saying they have not lowered the standards?” LEMON: “There’s no evidence about lowering standards. And I think that there is —” MUSK: “I believe that is a false statement you’re making.” LEMON: “Okay, well, we’ll figure it out.” MUSK: “The interesting thing is, when this is posted on the X platform, there will be a whole bunch of things that rebut what you said and what I said. And so people can then make their own decision, based on the replies and the rebuttals and the community notes.”

Who Won? Elon Musk Debates Don Lemon Over the Impact of DEI Programs Lemon repeatedly said, “There’s no evidence” that DEI programs are lowering medical standards, a comment Elon Musk believes is a “false statement.” Who is right? Musk calls on Community Notes to settle the score. LEMON: “There was a repost of Ben Shapiro that you claim that DEI is killing people. Specifically, you point to medicine. You claim that DEI programs are putting people at risk. Do you really believe this to be true? And what evidence do you have to support it?” MUSK: “What I was referring to there was that if we lower the standards for doctors, if the test for a doctor is lowered, then the probability of them making a mistake and killing someone is obviously going to be higher.” LEMON: “Wait, say that again. I’m not sure I understand what you said. I want to make sure I understand what you’re saying.” MUSK: “Yes. If the status for passing medical exams and becoming a doctor, especially something like a surgeon, if the standards are lowered, then the probability that the surgeon will make a mistake is higher. They’re making mistakes in their exam. They may make mistakes with people — and that may result in people dying.” LEMON: “What evidence do you have, though, that they’re lowering the standards? There is no evidence of that.” MUSK: “I believe there is.” LEMON: “There’s no evidence of that, Elon. What is the evidence?” MUSK: “I believe they have literally lowered the standards at Duke University, and that is what the article was referring to. You are saying they have not lowered the standards?” LEMON: “There’s no evidence about lowering standards. And I think that there is —” MUSK: “I believe that is a false statement you’re making.” LEMON: “Okay, well, we’ll figure it out.” MUSK: “The interesting thing is, when this is posted on the X platform, there will be a whole bunch of things that rebut what you said and what I said. And so people can then make their own decision, based on the replies and the rebuttals and the community notes.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

5,539,073 views • 2 years ago

Abby Phillip: “Why can't [Trump] see this for what it is, which is a very real thing, not a hoax, with real victims, and with a lot of people potentially involved in something, none of whom have been held accountable?” Scott Jennings: “Well, the hoax is Democrats and others who have gone on television and either implied or worse that he had something to do with it. There's not a shred of evidence that he had anything to do with it, but that's what they want people to believe. That's the narrative that they are trying to get out there.” “That's the hoax. He's never said what happened to them as a hoax. In fact, there seems to be some shards of evidence in here that Trump may have been one of the people that turned in Jeffrey Epstein, which is why Epstein, according to some of the documents, apparently hated Donald Trump. And so the hoax is not that it happened. The hoax is what people are trying to imply or worse—”

Abby Phillip: “Why can't [Trump] see this for what it is, which is a very real thing, not a hoax, with real victims, and with a lot of people potentially involved in something, none of whom have been held accountable?” Scott Jennings: “Well, the hoax is Democrats and others who have gone on television and either implied or worse that he had something to do with it. There's not a shred of evidence that he had anything to do with it, but that's what they want people to believe. That's the narrative that they are trying to get out there.” “That's the hoax. He's never said what happened to them as a hoax. In fact, there seems to be some shards of evidence in here that Trump may have been one of the people that turned in Jeffrey Epstein, which is why Epstein, according to some of the documents, apparently hated Donald Trump. And so the hoax is not that it happened. The hoax is what people are trying to imply or worse—”

RedWave Press

53,415 views • 10 months ago

Reporter: You have made so clear how you want to keep drugs out of the US— Trump: Right Reporter: Can you explain why you would pardon a notorious drug trafficker? Trump: I don’t know who you are talking about Reporter: Juan Orlando Hernandez Trump: Many of the people of Honduras said it was a Biden setup. I looked at the facts and agreed with them. Reporter: What evidence can you share that it was a setup? Trump: You can take any country you want, if somebody sells drugs in that country, that doesn’t mean you arrest the president and put him in jail for the rest of his life.

Reporter: You have made so clear how you want to keep drugs out of the US— Trump: Right Reporter: Can you explain why you would pardon a notorious drug trafficker? Trump: I don’t know who you are talking about Reporter: Juan Orlando Hernandez Trump: Many of the people of Honduras said it was a Biden setup. I looked at the facts and agreed with them. Reporter: What evidence can you share that it was a setup? Trump: You can take any country you want, if somebody sells drugs in that country, that doesn’t mean you arrest the president and put him in jail for the rest of his life.

Acyn

4,200,333 views • 10 months ago