Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

🚨Thorium Reactors: China Just Did What Everyone Else Talked About for 50 Years China has just crossed a line the rest of the world never managed to step over. Their experimental thorium molten salt reactor has successfully converted thorium into uranium-233 and sustained nuclear fission inside a working system.... This matters more than most people realize. Thorium has always been the nuclear fuel that sounded great in theory and died in practice. It is more abundant than uranium. It produces less long lived waste. It is also harder to weaponize. The physics have been understood since the Cold War, but the problem was always execution, materials, corrosion and chemistry. Control. China solved enough of those problems to make the fuel cycle work. The reactor in question is small, producing only two megawatts so it's not powering cities or feeding the grid, but that is not the point. This was a proof of capability, not a commercial rollout. They demonstrated something no other country has publicly demonstrated. Breeding uranium-233 from thorium inside a molten salt reactor and using it to sustain fission. That single step unlocks the entire thorium fuel cycle. They did it with a reactor that operates at atmospheric pressure, uses liquid fuel, and can be designed to shut itself down passively if things go wrong. No danger of high pressure steam explosions, no fuel rods to melt and no water cooling dependency. China has large domestic thorium reserves. Uranium supply chains are global, fragile, and politically exposed. Thorium changes that equation. It also changes waste profiles and long term fuel availability. In theory, it allows centuries of base load power from material that was previously treated as a curiosity. The United States, Europe, and others studied molten salt reactors decades ago and walked away. Not because they were impossible, but because conventional uranium reactors were already entrenched, regulated, and profitable. Thorium was disruptive before disruption was fashionable. China stayed with it and built materials science programs around it. They accepted slow progress. They ran experiments without promising headlines, and now they are the only country that can point to an operating thorium molten salt reactor that actually does what the textbooks said it should. This does not mean commercial thorium power is around the corner. Scaling this is hard and so is licensing it. Operating molten salt systems for decades is hard. But the breakthrough is real. If the technology that could redefine nuclear safety, fuel independence, and long term energy stability just matured outside the West, what else are we assuming is impossible simply because we stopped trying? #Thorium #NuclearEnergy #China #EnergySecurity #MoltenSaltReactor #CleanEnergy #AdvancedNuclear Video clip source:show more

Skywatch Signal

101,254 subscribers

148,292 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

It is now the seventh day – something that has never happened before – of an emergency situation at the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant. Because of Russian shelling, the plant has been cut off from power, disconnected from the electrical grid, and is being supplied with electricity by diesel generators. This is extraordinary. The generators and the plant were not designed for this, have never operated in this mode for long, and we already have information that one generator has failed. It is Russian shelling that prevents repair of the power lines to the plant and the restoration of basic safety. This is a threat to everyone – no terrorist in the world has ever dared to do to a nuclear plant what Russia is doing. And it is right that the world does not stay silent.

It is now the seventh day – something that has never happened before – of an emergency situation at the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant. Because of Russian shelling, the plant has been cut off from power, disconnected from the electrical grid, and is being supplied with electricity by diesel generators. This is extraordinary. The generators and the plant were not designed for this, have never operated in this mode for long, and we already have information that one generator has failed. It is Russian shelling that prevents repair of the power lines to the plant and the restoration of basic safety. This is a threat to everyone – no terrorist in the world has ever dared to do to a nuclear plant what Russia is doing. And it is right that the world does not stay silent.

Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський

971,576 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

#WATCH | On being asked about the West Asia conflict and where the Islamabad MoU stands right now, Senior Journalist, Political Commentator & Author, Fareed Zakaria says, "It's completely dead. It was predictable that it would be dead... Iran has figured out it has a usable nuclear weapon that can be used as leverage, which is control over the Strait of Hormuz...What we are trying to solve now is a problem created by the war itself, and even that has not been solved. In my opinion, the whole thing is a very humiliating defeat for the United States" "It's completely dead. And it was predictable that it would be dead because it is a memorandum of misunderstanding...Iran has figured out it has a usable nuclear weapon, in other words, a weapon that is actually more powerful because it can be used as leverage. That leverage is control over the Strait of Hormuz, and they want to assert that power...To give you an understanding of how poorly this war has gone for the United States, remember President Trump's original goal, which was to destroy the Iranian regime, have the people of Iran launch an uprising, and bring democracy to Iran. That didn't work. The goal number two became the nuclear issue...The desire to get the Iranians to hand over their enriched uranium, swear that they would never use it again, and permanently end the program none of that has happened. The third goal then became control of the Strait of Hormuz, which, of course, was open before the war. What we are trying to solve now is a problem created by the war itself, and even that has not been solved. In my opinion, the whole thing is a very humiliating defeat for the United States" Watch full interview here:

#WATCH | On being asked about the West Asia conflict and where the Islamabad MoU stands right now, Senior Journalist, Political Commentator & Author, Fareed Zakaria says, "It's completely dead. It was predictable that it would be dead... Iran has figured out it has a usable nuclear weapon that can be used as leverage, which is control over the Strait of Hormuz...What we are trying to solve now is a problem created by the war itself, and even that has not been solved. In my opinion, the whole thing is a very humiliating defeat for the United States" "It's completely dead. And it was predictable that it would be dead because it is a memorandum of misunderstanding...Iran has figured out it has a usable nuclear weapon, in other words, a weapon that is actually more powerful because it can be used as leverage. That leverage is control over the Strait of Hormuz, and they want to assert that power...To give you an understanding of how poorly this war has gone for the United States, remember President Trump's original goal, which was to destroy the Iranian regime, have the people of Iran launch an uprising, and bring democracy to Iran. That didn't work. The goal number two became the nuclear issue...The desire to get the Iranians to hand over their enriched uranium, swear that they would never use it again, and permanently end the program none of that has happened. The third goal then became control of the Strait of Hormuz, which, of course, was open before the war. What we are trying to solve now is a problem created by the war itself, and even that has not been solved. In my opinion, the whole thing is a very humiliating defeat for the United States" Watch full interview here:

ANI

49,071 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

VIDEO EDUCATION: $NNE KRONOS MMR™ is one of the Highest Technology Readiness Level Advanced Small Modular Reactors in development. "WITH SO MUCH POWER COMES GREAT RESPONSIBLITY" Millimeter Size Bites of Uranium are trapped in tiny ceramic pressure vessels that can withstand extreme temperatures and radiation. These particles are then incased within fully dense Silicon Carbide Matrix, somewhat like incasing the fuel in a diamond. Silicon Carbide is used for tank armor and has a extreme highly melting temperature, far beyond the heat generated by the fuel. It is particularly resilient to radiation and does not chemically interact with other materials in the reactor #MadeInAmerica #NuclearEnergy #NuclearFuel #Uranium #Leader #USA $NNE HALEU Energy Fuel Inc. Advanced Fuel Transportation Inc. NANO Nuclear Space 🇺🇸⚛️

VIDEO EDUCATION: $NNE KRONOS MMR™ is one of the Highest Technology Readiness Level Advanced Small Modular Reactors in development. "WITH SO MUCH POWER COMES GREAT RESPONSIBLITY" Millimeter Size Bites of Uranium are trapped in tiny ceramic pressure vessels that can withstand extreme temperatures and radiation. These particles are then incased within fully dense Silicon Carbide Matrix, somewhat like incasing the fuel in a diamond. Silicon Carbide is used for tank armor and has a extreme highly melting temperature, far beyond the heat generated by the fuel. It is particularly resilient to radiation and does not chemically interact with other materials in the reactor #MadeInAmerica #NuclearEnergy #NuclearFuel #Uranium #Leader #USA $NNE HALEU Energy Fuel Inc. Advanced Fuel Transportation Inc. NANO Nuclear Space 🇺🇸⚛️

NANO Nuclear Energy (NASDAQ: NNE)

126,131 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The Islamic regime in Iran cannot be allowed to keep its enriched uranium. For decades they’ve been trying to build a nuclear bomb. They currently have 60 percent enriched uranium. From that level, they can get to 90 percent which is weapons-grade in a week or so. That’s why America and Israel had to act when they did. So the real question is: what happens to that uranium? There are only two real options. Either Iran gives it up peacefully, or someone has to go in and take it by force, because this is not something that can just sit there for the Islamic regime to keep.

The Islamic regime in Iran cannot be allowed to keep its enriched uranium. For decades they’ve been trying to build a nuclear bomb. They currently have 60 percent enriched uranium. From that level, they can get to 90 percent which is weapons-grade in a week or so. That’s why America and Israel had to act when they did. So the real question is: what happens to that uranium? There are only two real options. Either Iran gives it up peacefully, or someone has to go in and take it by force, because this is not something that can just sit there for the Islamic regime to keep.

Noa Tishby

19,300 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

The most brutal part is not that China is using AI to sort garbage. It is that China has pushed waste management so far that the old problem has reversed. China used to worry about having too much garbage to process. Now some waste-to-energy plants are facing the opposite problem: not enough garbage. Previously sealed landfills may even have to be reopened, not because China failed, but because waste has become fuel, feedstock, data, and part of an industrial recycling loop. This is what China does best. It takes the ugliest, dirtiest, most ignored corner of urban life — garbage — and turns it into engineering, automation, energy recovery, environmental governance, and industrial optimization. Even trash gets absorbed into the machine. In many countries, garbage is where governance collapses. In China, even garbage becomes a system.

The most brutal part is not that China is using AI to sort garbage. It is that China has pushed waste management so far that the old problem has reversed. China used to worry about having too much garbage to process. Now some waste-to-energy plants are facing the opposite problem: not enough garbage. Previously sealed landfills may even have to be reopened, not because China failed, but because waste has become fuel, feedstock, data, and part of an industrial recycling loop. This is what China does best. It takes the ugliest, dirtiest, most ignored corner of urban life — garbage — and turns it into engineering, automation, energy recovery, environmental governance, and industrial optimization. Even trash gets absorbed into the machine. In many countries, garbage is where governance collapses. In China, even garbage becomes a system.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

458,889 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🇺🇸 🇮🇷 THE MULLAHS JUST TOLD ON THEMSELVES. Iran has been screaming "peaceful nuclear energy" for two decades. But the moment Trump put a real deal on the table, offering low-grade enriched uranium for civilian power, they flinched. You don't flinch if you have nothing to hide. Low-enriched uranium runs your power grid. High-enriched uranium builds a bomb. Iran wants to keep the high-grade stuff. That tells you everything about what they were building. This is not a nuclear energy program. It never was. It's a weapons program wrapped in diplomatic language and stalled negotiations. Reagan said trust but verify. Trump said verify or walk. Iran's response to both is the same: delay, deflect, and enrich. The regime isn't protecting energy infrastructure. They're protecting a warhead they haven't finished yet. Every day the media calls this a "diplomatic standoff" is a day they're covering for a government that has publicly called for the destruction of Israel and death to America. Call it what it is. Iran wants the bomb. They always did. And they just admitted it by refusing the one deal that would only work if their intentions were clean. The mask is off. The question now is whether the world has the spine to act like it.

🇺🇸 🇮🇷 THE MULLAHS JUST TOLD ON THEMSELVES. Iran has been screaming "peaceful nuclear energy" for two decades. But the moment Trump put a real deal on the table, offering low-grade enriched uranium for civilian power, they flinched. You don't flinch if you have nothing to hide. Low-enriched uranium runs your power grid. High-enriched uranium builds a bomb. Iran wants to keep the high-grade stuff. That tells you everything about what they were building. This is not a nuclear energy program. It never was. It's a weapons program wrapped in diplomatic language and stalled negotiations. Reagan said trust but verify. Trump said verify or walk. Iran's response to both is the same: delay, deflect, and enrich. The regime isn't protecting energy infrastructure. They're protecting a warhead they haven't finished yet. Every day the media calls this a "diplomatic standoff" is a day they're covering for a government that has publicly called for the destruction of Israel and death to America. Call it what it is. Iran wants the bomb. They always did. And they just admitted it by refusing the one deal that would only work if their intentions were clean. The mask is off. The question now is whether the world has the spine to act like it.

Bill Mitchell

82,791 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

There is a reason why Trump has been wanting to buy Greenland since his first administration. It's all part of his trade war with China. China used a company called Greenland Minerals to get their hands on valuable minerals in the country. Chinese company, Shenghe Resources Holdings, is the largest stakeholder in Greenland Minerals. So they have been essentially mining and moving their way into Greenland for years now. China is essentially processing rare earth concentrates that contains the radioactive elements uranium and thorium. So this isn't just for some meme that Trump is doing this. The land has strategic value. Around the exact same time that Trump first brought buying Greenland to the forefront, he told reporters that he was the "chosen one" to win the trade wars with China. Listen to him closely in this last clip: "Over the last five years, China has made 500 billion dollars. Ripped it out of the United States. Somebody had to do it. I am the chosen one. So I'm taking on China on trade. And you know what? We are winning. We are the piggy back, we are the ones that all these countries wants to rob and take advantage of. I was put here by people to do a great job and that's what I am doing."

There is a reason why Trump has been wanting to buy Greenland since his first administration. It's all part of his trade war with China. China used a company called Greenland Minerals to get their hands on valuable minerals in the country. Chinese company, Shenghe Resources Holdings, is the largest stakeholder in Greenland Minerals. So they have been essentially mining and moving their way into Greenland for years now. China is essentially processing rare earth concentrates that contains the radioactive elements uranium and thorium. So this isn't just for some meme that Trump is doing this. The land has strategic value. Around the exact same time that Trump first brought buying Greenland to the forefront, he told reporters that he was the "chosen one" to win the trade wars with China. Listen to him closely in this last clip: "Over the last five years, China has made 500 billion dollars. Ripped it out of the United States. Somebody had to do it. I am the chosen one. So I'm taking on China on trade. And you know what? We are winning. We are the piggy back, we are the ones that all these countries wants to rob and take advantage of. I was put here by people to do a great job and that's what I am doing."

Green Lives Matter

28,880 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

#WATCH | Surat, Gujarat: On India advancing civil nuclear programme, Senior Scientist, Dept. of Atomic Energy, Dr Neelam Goyal says, "... India’s economy rests on three pillars: agriculture, industry, and services. The backbone of all three is electricity. At present, around 70% of India’s electricity comes from coal, with much of the quality coal imported from Indonesia. This costs the country roughly Rs 12,000 crore annually. To achieve self-reliance, India must develop domestic energy sources. India possesses vast reserves of thorium—around 85% of the world’s supply—enough to generate 5,000 units of electricity per person per year for 500 years, compared to the current 1,000 units. Yet nuclear energy faces public resistance due to misconceptions and fear. As a result, nuclear projects are often delayed for a decade or more. I completed my PhD in 2008 at Rajasthan University, studying the impact of nuclear power plants on regional economies, welfare, and health. In 2009, I undertook postdoctoral training with India’s Department of Atomic Energy in Mumbai... Since 2011, after the Fukushima disaster, I have worked to raise awareness and reduce opposition to nuclear energy across states, including Haryana, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, and Gujarat. Currently, India operates 23 reactors using uranium, imported from countries such as Australia and Mongolia. Uranium is a fissile element, and its by-product, plutonium, can also be used as fuel. India’s fast breeder reactor programme now utilises plutonium, and when combined with thorium, it can be converted into uranium-233, a powerful fissile material. This opens the door to smaller reactors and long-term energy independence, potentially supplying India with abundant electricity for years."

#WATCH | Surat, Gujarat: On India advancing civil nuclear programme, Senior Scientist, Dept. of Atomic Energy, Dr Neelam Goyal says, "... India’s economy rests on three pillars: agriculture, industry, and services. The backbone of all three is electricity. At present, around 70% of India’s electricity comes from coal, with much of the quality coal imported from Indonesia. This costs the country roughly Rs 12,000 crore annually. To achieve self-reliance, India must develop domestic energy sources. India possesses vast reserves of thorium—around 85% of the world’s supply—enough to generate 5,000 units of electricity per person per year for 500 years, compared to the current 1,000 units. Yet nuclear energy faces public resistance due to misconceptions and fear. As a result, nuclear projects are often delayed for a decade or more. I completed my PhD in 2008 at Rajasthan University, studying the impact of nuclear power plants on regional economies, welfare, and health. In 2009, I undertook postdoctoral training with India’s Department of Atomic Energy in Mumbai... Since 2011, after the Fukushima disaster, I have worked to raise awareness and reduce opposition to nuclear energy across states, including Haryana, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, and Gujarat. Currently, India operates 23 reactors using uranium, imported from countries such as Australia and Mongolia. Uranium is a fissile element, and its by-product, plutonium, can also be used as fuel. India’s fast breeder reactor programme now utilises plutonium, and when combined with thorium, it can be converted into uranium-233, a powerful fissile material. This opens the door to smaller reactors and long-term energy independence, potentially supplying India with abundant electricity for years."

ANI

19,136 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨"The issue of nuclear enrichment for Iran is a non-negotiable, and the reason is that not only is enriching uranium important for Iran because Iran is developing nuclear power plants, but it is also a country that has always been experiencing sanctions. So if, for example, we have a power plant and for whatever reason US sanctions prevent Iran from purchasing nuclear fuel, then we'll have a crisis at multiple levels in the economy. This is a part of Iran's sovereignty. Iran has the sovereign right to enrich uranium. And for any country to tell Iran that you cannot do this because we don't want you to do so, that's unacceptable," shares Dr. Mohammad Marandi (Seyed Mohammad Marandi) during our recent interview. 🔴 Watch the full interview with Dr. Marandi:

🚨"The issue of nuclear enrichment for Iran is a non-negotiable, and the reason is that not only is enriching uranium important for Iran because Iran is developing nuclear power plants, but it is also a country that has always been experiencing sanctions. So if, for example, we have a power plant and for whatever reason US sanctions prevent Iran from purchasing nuclear fuel, then we'll have a crisis at multiple levels in the economy. This is a part of Iran's sovereignty. Iran has the sovereign right to enrich uranium. And for any country to tell Iran that you cannot do this because we don't want you to do so, that's unacceptable," shares Dr. Mohammad Marandi (Seyed Mohammad Marandi) during our recent interview. 🔴 Watch the full interview with Dr. Marandi:

Lena Petrova

236,175 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Only men do not want to agree to that. "I think that the United States needs to be more like China because China is the safest country I have ever been to in my entire life, and it is because of the amount of surveillance that they have. Everybody always likes to talk about how China is so scary because of their surveillance. No, that is literally why it is so safe. That is why I can travel here as a woman by myself. I've been to over 50 countries, and I can confidently say that I feel more safe as a woman because of the security that is in place in this country.”

Only men do not want to agree to that. "I think that the United States needs to be more like China because China is the safest country I have ever been to in my entire life, and it is because of the amount of surveillance that they have. Everybody always likes to talk about how China is so scary because of their surveillance. No, that is literally why it is so safe. That is why I can travel here as a woman by myself. I've been to over 50 countries, and I can confidently say that I feel more safe as a woman because of the security that is in place in this country.”

Johannes Maria

32,856 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Jeff Bezos just described the Moon as a fuel depot, and the number behind it explains why nothing has ever left this planet cheaply. Bezos: “it has a very low gravitational field, only a sixth of Earth’s, which means it takes about 30 times less energy to lift a kilogram of mass off the Moon than it does to lift it off the Earth.” Thirty to one. That number rewrites the economics of everything beyond this planet. Every rocket ever launched has fought the same math. The fuel required to escape Earth is so heavy that most of what a rocket carries is the fuel needed to carry the fuel. The Moon breaks that cycle. It sits outside the well with water frozen in its shadowed craters, and water splits into hydrogen and oxygen. Hydrogen and oxygen are rocket fuel. Bezos: “the Moon is really a gift” Fill the tank up there instead of down here and the arithmetic of the entire solar system changes. Bezos: “So we can use the Moon as a rocket fuel depot to go to the rest of the solar system.” Not a destination. A gas station. Then there is the second constraint, which is that the sky itself runs on a schedule. Bezos: “unfortunately to get to other planetary bodies, they have very rare launch windows. Mars, you can go to Mars once every 26 months or so.” Miss the window and the answer is not next week. It is two years and change. Every world beyond our own operates on a timetable that does not care about human ambition. Bezos: “It’s so close to Earth. It’s only three and a half days away.” Except the Moon. The Moon is always there. Always reachable. That is what makes it the staging ground rather than the trophy. Apollo treated it as an endpoint, planted a flag, and came home. The flag was the mistake. A gas station is worth more than a monument. Monuments end the story. Infrastructure is what lets everyone who comes after take the trip for granted. Every era of exploration on Earth followed the same shape. Someone crossed once for glory, then someone built a port, and only after the port did ordinary people go. We have been staring at the Moon for three hundred thousand years thinking it was a destination. It was never the destination. It was the door. Every planet in the solar system just got closer. Not because the distances changed, but because the starting point did.

Jeff Bezos just described the Moon as a fuel depot, and the number behind it explains why nothing has ever left this planet cheaply. Bezos: “it has a very low gravitational field, only a sixth of Earth’s, which means it takes about 30 times less energy to lift a kilogram of mass off the Moon than it does to lift it off the Earth.” Thirty to one. That number rewrites the economics of everything beyond this planet. Every rocket ever launched has fought the same math. The fuel required to escape Earth is so heavy that most of what a rocket carries is the fuel needed to carry the fuel. The Moon breaks that cycle. It sits outside the well with water frozen in its shadowed craters, and water splits into hydrogen and oxygen. Hydrogen and oxygen are rocket fuel. Bezos: “the Moon is really a gift” Fill the tank up there instead of down here and the arithmetic of the entire solar system changes. Bezos: “So we can use the Moon as a rocket fuel depot to go to the rest of the solar system.” Not a destination. A gas station. Then there is the second constraint, which is that the sky itself runs on a schedule. Bezos: “unfortunately to get to other planetary bodies, they have very rare launch windows. Mars, you can go to Mars once every 26 months or so.” Miss the window and the answer is not next week. It is two years and change. Every world beyond our own operates on a timetable that does not care about human ambition. Bezos: “It’s so close to Earth. It’s only three and a half days away.” Except the Moon. The Moon is always there. Always reachable. That is what makes it the staging ground rather than the trophy. Apollo treated it as an endpoint, planted a flag, and came home. The flag was the mistake. A gas station is worth more than a monument. Monuments end the story. Infrastructure is what lets everyone who comes after take the trip for granted. Every era of exploration on Earth followed the same shape. Someone crossed once for glory, then someone built a port, and only after the port did ordinary people go. We have been staring at the Moon for three hundred thousand years thinking it was a destination. It was never the destination. It was the door. Every planet in the solar system just got closer. Not because the distances changed, but because the starting point did.

Dustin

37,008 Aufrufe • vor 17 Tagen

Blinken finally said the quiet part out loud: The United States cannot defeat China alone. So his solution is not to outbuild, outproduce, or outcompete China. It is to assemble Europe, Japan, South Korea, India, Canada, and Australia into a larger anti-China bloc—then disguise containment as “alliance coordination.” That is the entire strategy: America alone is no longer strong enough, so Washington wants to weaponize everyone else’s anxieties. But here is the darkest joke. While Blinken dreams of mobilizing the world against China, global opinion is moving in the opposite direction. Pew polling now shows China viewed more positively than the United States across many countries. Even in Europe—America’s traditional alliance base—China’s favorability has risen above America’s. So Washington has a structural problem: It wants to lead an anti-China coalition at the exact moment more of the world trusts China than the country demanding that coalition. Blinken calls this “working with friends.” China calls it what it is: An empire that can no longer win alone asking its clients to supply the missing weight. America’s alliances were supposed to prove its leadership. Now they increasingly reveal its dependence. China is competing with the United States. The United States is recruiting the world to compensate for the fact that it cannot compete with China by itself. Yet the funniest meltdown did not come from American rednecks. It came from overseas Chinese opportunists who built their entire identity around hating China. Blinken merely admitted that America cannot defeat China alone, and they immediately accused him of being “brainwashed” and spreading “Chinese propaganda.” Their problem is not China. Their problem is that China’s rise has destroyed the psychological mechanism they depend on for survival: the belief that America must always stand above China—because without that hierarchy, their entire borrowed identity collapses.

Blinken finally said the quiet part out loud: The United States cannot defeat China alone. So his solution is not to outbuild, outproduce, or outcompete China. It is to assemble Europe, Japan, South Korea, India, Canada, and Australia into a larger anti-China bloc—then disguise containment as “alliance coordination.” That is the entire strategy: America alone is no longer strong enough, so Washington wants to weaponize everyone else’s anxieties. But here is the darkest joke. While Blinken dreams of mobilizing the world against China, global opinion is moving in the opposite direction. Pew polling now shows China viewed more positively than the United States across many countries. Even in Europe—America’s traditional alliance base—China’s favorability has risen above America’s. So Washington has a structural problem: It wants to lead an anti-China coalition at the exact moment more of the world trusts China than the country demanding that coalition. Blinken calls this “working with friends.” China calls it what it is: An empire that can no longer win alone asking its clients to supply the missing weight. America’s alliances were supposed to prove its leadership. Now they increasingly reveal its dependence. China is competing with the United States. The United States is recruiting the world to compensate for the fact that it cannot compete with China by itself. Yet the funniest meltdown did not come from American rednecks. It came from overseas Chinese opportunists who built their entire identity around hating China. Blinken merely admitted that America cannot defeat China alone, and they immediately accused him of being “brainwashed” and spreading “Chinese propaganda.” Their problem is not China. Their problem is that China’s rise has destroyed the psychological mechanism they depend on for survival: the belief that America must always stand above China—because without that hierarchy, their entire borrowed identity collapses.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

41,499 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨 NOW: President Trump announces Iran specifically informed him only the US or CHINA will be capable of retrieving the nuclear dust "Iran told me very strongly they intend to give US the nuclear dust." "But you're going to have to take it out, because the site was so obliterated that there's only one or two countries in the world that could get it. It's so deep and got hit so hard that there's no way they have the equipment to move it. You and China are the only two countries in the world that could take it out!" "So we talked about it, and they said, you'll have to take it out, because we don't have the capability of doing it." "For those people that like to say that those great pilots in those great planes, well, we just ordered 22 more of them knew and improved, that those great pilots didn't do their job. They did their job."

🚨 NOW: President Trump announces Iran specifically informed him only the US or CHINA will be capable of retrieving the nuclear dust "Iran told me very strongly they intend to give US the nuclear dust." "But you're going to have to take it out, because the site was so obliterated that there's only one or two countries in the world that could get it. It's so deep and got hit so hard that there's no way they have the equipment to move it. You and China are the only two countries in the world that could take it out!" "So we talked about it, and they said, you'll have to take it out, because we don't have the capability of doing it." "For those people that like to say that those great pilots in those great planes, well, we just ordered 22 more of them knew and improved, that those great pilots didn't do their job. They did their job."

Eric Daugherty

1,783,238 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🇷🇺 Alexander Babakov Dismantles the Club of Rome’s Dogma of Scarcity World Resources Are Limitless. We Can Feed Everyone. We Can Clothe Everyone. We Can Create Favorable Conditions For All Alexander Babakov: What does the well-known Club of Rome tell us? There is a shortage of resources, there is a shortage of food, the population is too big, etc., and these are the principles that they built their forecasts on. And these forecasts are not true to life. What does Chairman Xi say? What does our president say? World resources are limitless. We can feed everyone, we can clothe everyone, we can create favorable conditions for all. What do we need? We need goal setting. And Chinese goal setting is not generating profit or making more money today than yesterday. No—the goal is to create the right environment for human development, for collective development, for the country as a whole. It is the upside potential that guarantees achieving the highest dreamed-for goals, and it relates to everything, including technological solutions. You’ve seen mind-blowing technological solutions that are aimed at improving the quality of life of the Chinese people. But it is not only that—China can export that. But the key thing is that China started with finance. China created an independent system from those conditions that were set by the West for other countries. For China, or even for Russia of the 1990s, the West was writing rules under which countries could develop only by relying on the amount of money that the metropolis left for that country. Well, you will have as much money as how much oil you have sold. This is how it was in ancient times, when there were real colonies, and the same thing is happening in the modern world. China closed this down and said: in terms of money to develop China, we have sufficient money for our projects. The money mass in the Chinese economy is higher than that of the United States, Europe, and Japan taken together. And China made numerous elements of the economy move together. They armed their people with resources to push development forward. And China does not have any tasks that are not achievable. For any country, there are certain constraints. There are constraints that can be described as the number of projects that can be implemented. This freedom of decision-making and setting a new goal—the quality of life—is something that the West has not yet understood, and it will have to accept that China will lead the world, and then other countries will follow China: Pakistan, which has the same mindset; India thinks the same; now Russia has its own vision. And our principal goal today is not profit-making, not increasing GDP, but a positive resolution of demographic problems—not only maintaining the population, but increasing the population. And it is not a quantitative but a qualitative goal.

🇷🇺 Alexander Babakov Dismantles the Club of Rome’s Dogma of Scarcity World Resources Are Limitless. We Can Feed Everyone. We Can Clothe Everyone. We Can Create Favorable Conditions For All Alexander Babakov: What does the well-known Club of Rome tell us? There is a shortage of resources, there is a shortage of food, the population is too big, etc., and these are the principles that they built their forecasts on. And these forecasts are not true to life. What does Chairman Xi say? What does our president say? World resources are limitless. We can feed everyone, we can clothe everyone, we can create favorable conditions for all. What do we need? We need goal setting. And Chinese goal setting is not generating profit or making more money today than yesterday. No—the goal is to create the right environment for human development, for collective development, for the country as a whole. It is the upside potential that guarantees achieving the highest dreamed-for goals, and it relates to everything, including technological solutions. You’ve seen mind-blowing technological solutions that are aimed at improving the quality of life of the Chinese people. But it is not only that—China can export that. But the key thing is that China started with finance. China created an independent system from those conditions that were set by the West for other countries. For China, or even for Russia of the 1990s, the West was writing rules under which countries could develop only by relying on the amount of money that the metropolis left for that country. Well, you will have as much money as how much oil you have sold. This is how it was in ancient times, when there were real colonies, and the same thing is happening in the modern world. China closed this down and said: in terms of money to develop China, we have sufficient money for our projects. The money mass in the Chinese economy is higher than that of the United States, Europe, and Japan taken together. And China made numerous elements of the economy move together. They armed their people with resources to push development forward. And China does not have any tasks that are not achievable. For any country, there are certain constraints. There are constraints that can be described as the number of projects that can be implemented. This freedom of decision-making and setting a new goal—the quality of life—is something that the West has not yet understood, and it will have to accept that China will lead the world, and then other countries will follow China: Pakistan, which has the same mindset; India thinks the same; now Russia has its own vision. And our principal goal today is not profit-making, not increasing GDP, but a positive resolution of demographic problems—not only maintaining the population, but increasing the population. And it is not a quantitative but a qualitative goal.

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

34,596 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🇪🇺🇺🇸🇷🇺🇨🇳 Kallas, the EU's Chief Diplomat says the US looks weak and not credible, because they give in to Russia, but want to confront China! EU’s diplomacy is top notch these days. "I hear statements from some American officials who claim that it is impossible to defeat Russia, because it is much larger and more powerful. They say that we need to give in to it, because pressure will not work. But at the same time, these same people are convincing Asian allies that if China attacks, the United States will be on their side. At the same time, China has a much more powerful economy and a larger army than Russia. If we are not able to put enough pressure on Moscow together to have a real effect, then how can we claim that we can defeat China?"

🇪🇺🇺🇸🇷🇺🇨🇳 Kallas, the EU's Chief Diplomat says the US looks weak and not credible, because they give in to Russia, but want to confront China! EU’s diplomacy is top notch these days. "I hear statements from some American officials who claim that it is impossible to defeat Russia, because it is much larger and more powerful. They say that we need to give in to it, because pressure will not work. But at the same time, these same people are convincing Asian allies that if China attacks, the United States will be on their side. At the same time, China has a much more powerful economy and a larger army than Russia. If we are not able to put enough pressure on Moscow together to have a real effect, then how can we claim that we can defeat China?"

Lord Bebo

100,384 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

This is the outline currently under discussion between the United States and Iran. I am sharing this with caution, as it hasn’t been agreed upon yet, but based on recent developments, these are the points they have been discussing: A 15-year suspension of uranium enrichment. The United States originally demanded 20 years, while the Iranians wanted much less; they eventually settled on 15. The plan includes converting uranium into fuel, which changes its physical state and makes it harder to re-enrich. While not a simple process, this means the uranium won't necessarily leave Iran, which is a major concern for Israel. Full inspection of nuclear sites and the opening of the Strait of Hormuz are, of course, a given. The deal would also include ending the war, the withdrawal of American forces from the Gulf, and the lifting of economic sanctions. It must be said that, aside from the uranium, the lifting of sanctions is what worries Israel the most. As you recall, the strategic goal of the war was to create the conditions for the regime’s downfall. The regime was in danger of collapsing due to an economic situation that deteriorated primarily because of those sanctions; if they are lifted, the regime is strengthened. Therefore, it seems to me that the perception in Israel remains that the status quo is preferable—a state of "no war, no peace" where U.S. military forces remain on standby in the Persian Gulf. But as we have learned, this does not depend solely on Israel's desires, to put it mildly.

This is the outline currently under discussion between the United States and Iran. I am sharing this with caution, as it hasn’t been agreed upon yet, but based on recent developments, these are the points they have been discussing: A 15-year suspension of uranium enrichment. The United States originally demanded 20 years, while the Iranians wanted much less; they eventually settled on 15. The plan includes converting uranium into fuel, which changes its physical state and makes it harder to re-enrich. While not a simple process, this means the uranium won't necessarily leave Iran, which is a major concern for Israel. Full inspection of nuclear sites and the opening of the Strait of Hormuz are, of course, a given. The deal would also include ending the war, the withdrawal of American forces from the Gulf, and the lifting of economic sanctions. It must be said that, aside from the uranium, the lifting of sanctions is what worries Israel the most. As you recall, the strategic goal of the war was to create the conditions for the regime’s downfall. The regime was in danger of collapsing due to an economic situation that deteriorated primarily because of those sanctions; if they are lifted, the regime is strengthened. Therefore, it seems to me that the perception in Israel remains that the status quo is preferable—a state of "no war, no peace" where U.S. military forces remain on standby in the Persian Gulf. But as we have learned, this does not depend solely on Israel's desires, to put it mildly.

Amit Segal

258,101 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten