正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Three words I would use to describe this: Reckless. Illegal. Hypocritical. The MHA’s own official FAQ on Arms Rules, 2016 repeat: “Brandishing or discharge of firearms … in any public place … is strictly prohibited.” Why is it unsafe? → 7.62×39mm bullet fired straight up can travel 2–3 km...

53,805 次观看 • 6 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Rick Rubin tells Andrew Huberman how he deals with creative or writer’s block. He treats his work like a diary entry (and doesn’t worry about internal or external judgment): ➡️ “What's the cause of the block? The block is usually something that's either personal ("I'm not good enough") or it can be a confidence issue ("I don't have anything to say") or it could be...thinking about someone else ("nobody's going to like what I make"). Do you know what I'm saying? So, it's either fear of self-judgment or external judgment. If you're making something with a freedom of "this is something I'm making for myself for now", that is all [you have to do]. It is a diary entry. Everything I make is a diary entry. The beauty of a diary entry is that I can write my diary entry and you can't tell me that my diary entry wasn't good enough. Or that [the diary entry] is not what I experienced. Of course it's what I experienced: I'm writing a personal diary for myself and no one else can judge if it is my experience of my life. Everything we make can be that: a personal reflection of who we are in that moment of time. It doesn't have to be the greatest you could ever do. It doesn't have to have any expectation that it's going to change the world. It doesn't have to sell a certain number of copies for any reason. It doesn't have any of those things at all. It is "I'm making this thing for me and I want to do it to the best of my ability and to where I feel good about it". [The work] is honest of where I'm at and if you're living in this world of just being honest to where you're at, there's nothing blocking you. There are no blocks. The blocks are all based on dealing with a different force or a different perception that is made up.” ⬅️

Trung Phan

1,619,969 次观看 • 2 年前

There is no provision in the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 that allows a traffic inspector or constable to physically assault a citizen. ⚖️ What the law actually allows Traffic police can: Stop vehicles for checking Verify documents (DL, RC, insurance, etc.) Issue challans or fines Detain a vehicle in certain violations But use of force is strictly limited and must follow legal procedure only in situations like self-defence or preventing a serious offence, and even then it must be reasonable and proportionate. 🚫 Assault is illegal If a police officer hits or assaults someone, it can amount to: Assault / hurt under the Indian Penal Code Misuse of power / misconduct under police service rules 🛑 What you can do Record the incident (if safe) Note badge number / vehicle number File a complaint with senior police officials Approach the State Human Rights Commission or court 👉 Authority does not give the right to violence. Even police are bound by law. Source: IG/ @nawazkhan_official_ #bengaluru #bangalore #roadfight #civicfailure ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು ನಗರ ಪೊಲೀಸ್‌ BengaluruCityPolice ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು ಸಂಚಾರ ಪೊಲೀಸ್ BengaluruTrafficPolice CP Bengaluru ಪೊಲೀಸ್ ಆಯುಕ್ತ ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು Joint CP, Traffic, Bengaluru alok kumar DGP KARNATAKA ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ರಾಜ್ಯ ಪೊಲೀಸ್ Karnataka State Police S. Lalitha ChristinMathewPhilip

Karnataka Portfolio

22,121 次观看 • 4 个月前

Todays stream will be fun. So a few fellas on Twitter made this video and then posted it to desperately make me sound like a fool. This gun even explained it in “layman’s terms” in an act of kindness to even penetrate the deranged grift motivated shell of a failed and frankly retarded former comedian. Take note of the specific claims. It’s why wizards just attack, use in group intentionally confusing language, and avoid any potential falsification scenarios. Fortunately this specific video is relatively clear with claims. 1 the earth moves under an object once it no longer is “connected” to the ground. So the claim in layman’s terms means that the atmosphere and air surrounding the earth is not connected to the spin of the earth. Since the bullet clearly never leaves the atmosphere. 2 distance is “1000.” Rather that’s feet or meters it doesn’t matter. A major mistake by a wizard is staring any actual testable number. This ensures that once shown to be false they can’t just claim scale issues. It’s 1000. Not a billion, not a trillion. 1000. 3 direction matters but no mention of latitude. Since the earth spins 1000 mph at equator and 0 mph at the North Pole according to the current mainstream globe model, the latitude you are standing on would change the magnitude of coriolis effect by orders or magnitude regardless of direction. 4 the gun specialist doesn’t explain or calculate what the margin of error is for any shot at that distance with that gun and that specific round. And he has the ability to edit the video any way he sees fit. This gentlemen being demonstrably wrong does not disprove a globe or prove a flat non moving plane. It just disproves the evidence as stated by this man of Coriolis effect. The 24 hour sun in Antarctica does not disprove flat non moving plane or prove spinning ball. It just removes the potential argument for flat earthers and adds credibility to people who claim it would be 24 hours. None of this is personal it’s just a discussion on logic, claims, discernment, and the scientific method. If you are angry or scared by this or you just want to assume my intention and mock then you are of very little use to adult discussion. That includes flat earthers who are now claiming witsit is a clone. It’s pathetic narcissistic behavior. 1230 pm pst

Owen Benjamin 🐻

16,940 次观看 • 1 年前

No one witnessed Tyler Robinson. No video or any witness testimony of him, a gun, or any forensic evidence at all. Except dna on a rifle he owned that wasn’t tested for residue and did not alert any of the dogs. The footage never shows a gun or a clear shot of his face. It appears to be multiple people or he changes outfits. There is no evidence matching any bullet to the gun they claim was used. The only “evidence” they have are text messages that don’t sound real that have not been made available to the defense to analyze. Text messages can be sent by anyone. That isn’t evidence. And a confession that doesn’t exist and a claim his mother recognized him from the footage that we now can all see. That statement has not been made available and probably doesn’t exist, and it doesn’t matter. The video doesn’t show any crime and it’s not clear enough for any positive ID. There are mountains of circumstantial evidence that turning point USA conspired to either kill Charlie Kirk or cover up his murder. There is an end times cult that is convinced that in order to bring back Jesus they need the US to lose to Iran and the world to turn on Israel and burn. That’s a fact btw. That’s what Ben Shapiro and Trump and kushner and the “pastors” surrounding Charlie believe. They are claiming anyone that is NOT in their world destroying death cult is in fact in Candace Owens cult. People who don’t think Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk and Erika is a crazy bitch. Everything I just said is obviously accurate. It never ends well for death cults. This is not the first and it’s not the last. I recommend staying far far away as they destroy themselves

Owen Benjamin 🐻

72,329 次观看 • 1 个月前