Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Three words I would use to describe this: Reckless. Illegal. Hypocritical. The MHA’s own official FAQ on Arms Rules, 2016 repeat: “Brandishing or discharge of firearms … in any public place … is strictly prohibited.” Why is it unsafe? → 7.62×39mm bullet fired straight up can travel 2–3 km...

indiaguns's profile picture

IndiaGuns.com

5,559 subscribers

53,805 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

In-case you didn't know. There are documented injuries and occasional deaths from falling .22LR bullets, but it is also true that smaller and lighter bullets like .22LR generally carry less energy than larger handgun rounds (.32 ACP, .45 ACP, etc) when falling back down. But does that make it any less illegal? Rule 32(3) of the Arms Rules, 2016 prohibits celebratory firing, and violations carry serious consequences. For the curious, that is the Werywin 15-22 rifle chambered in .22LR. India's first AR-15 platform rifle designed specifically for civilian use. ⚠️ Disclaimer: Civilian firearm ownership in India is strictly regulated. All firearms and calibers require a valid NPB arms licence and full compliance with applicable laws.
0:23

In-case you didn't know. There are documented injuries and occasional deaths from falling .22LR bullets, but it is also true that smaller and lighter bullets like .22LR generally carry less energy than larger handgun rounds (.32 ACP, .45 ACP, etc) when falling back down. But does that make it any less illegal? Rule 32(3) of the Arms Rules, 2016 prohibits celebratory firing, and violations carry serious consequences. For the curious, that is the Werywin 15-22 rifle chambered in .22LR. India's first AR-15 platform rifle designed specifically for civilian use. ⚠️ Disclaimer: Civilian firearm ownership in India is strictly regulated. All firearms and calibers require a valid NPB arms licence and full compliance with applicable laws.

IndiaGuns.com

35,856 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

With the new changes to NFA Tax Stamps, many are asking how AR Pistols can be legally converted to a short-barreled rifle. In this video, we provide a general overview of the process. Always research and abide by your local laws and restrictions before continuing with the Form-1 process. DISCLAIMER: This video is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, legal advice. Consult qualified legal counsel or the ATF directly if you have questions specific to your situation. Firearms laws, regulations, and enforcement policies, including those administered by the ATF, are complex, vary by federal, state, and local jurisdiction, and are subject to change without notice. The information presented may not reflect the most current legal or regulatory developments. Viewers are solely responsible for determining whether the manufacture, possession, or use of any firearm or regulated item is lawful in their jurisdiction and for ensuring full compliance with all applicable laws and regulations before taking any action. Palmetto State Armory is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of the ATF or any other government agency. All actions taken based on this information are done at the viewer’s own risk. All firearms presented in this video are in compliance with federal, state, and local laws. Always shoot responsibly.
5:51

With the new changes to NFA Tax Stamps, many are asking how AR Pistols can be legally converted to a short-barreled rifle. In this video, we provide a general overview of the process. Always research and abide by your local laws and restrictions before continuing with the Form-1 process. DISCLAIMER: This video is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, legal advice. Consult qualified legal counsel or the ATF directly if you have questions specific to your situation. Firearms laws, regulations, and enforcement policies, including those administered by the ATF, are complex, vary by federal, state, and local jurisdiction, and are subject to change without notice. The information presented may not reflect the most current legal or regulatory developments. Viewers are solely responsible for determining whether the manufacture, possession, or use of any firearm or regulated item is lawful in their jurisdiction and for ensuring full compliance with all applicable laws and regulations before taking any action. Palmetto State Armory is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of the ATF or any other government agency. All actions taken based on this information are done at the viewer’s own risk. All firearms presented in this video are in compliance with federal, state, and local laws. Always shoot responsibly.

Palmetto State Armory

46,512 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Stanislaus County, California officers first arrive to speak with illegal migrants in fields This part is very damning, they make it clear they’re visiting illegals throughout the area, not just here, letting them all know neither Police or Sheriff will work with ICE They even start off with the question, “Do any of you speak English?” Not to worry, they brought a translator “We are trying to get information and talk to as many people as we can.” “I know there's a lot of worry about what immigration is going to be doing. We know there is concern in the community about immigration. We just want you guys to know first of all that you don't have to worry about law enforcement, the sheriff's office or the police.“ Why would these officers be going from field or illegals to field of illegals just to reassure them that both the Police Department and Sheriff won’t be working with ICE?? Why would they possibly need to do this?
0:56

Stanislaus County, California officers first arrive to speak with illegal migrants in fields This part is very damning, they make it clear they’re visiting illegals throughout the area, not just here, letting them all know neither Police or Sheriff will work with ICE They even start off with the question, “Do any of you speak English?” Not to worry, they brought a translator “We are trying to get information and talk to as many people as we can.” “I know there's a lot of worry about what immigration is going to be doing. We know there is concern in the community about immigration. We just want you guys to know first of all that you don't have to worry about law enforcement, the sheriff's office or the police.“ Why would these officers be going from field or illegals to field of illegals just to reassure them that both the Police Department and Sheriff won’t be working with ICE?? Why would they possibly need to do this?

Wall Street Apes

142,126 просмотров • 1 год назад

A female police officer broke down in tears after being assaulted by another female. And it took three male officers to finally restrain and arrest the attacker. If this isn’t a wake-up call for the Met Police to urgently review their training and tactics, I don’t know what is. Public safety is no place for weakness or politics. We need well-trained, resilient officers, regardless of gender,who can uphold the law and protect the public without becoming victims themselves. It’s time for serious reform. Enough is enough.
0:52

A female police officer broke down in tears after being assaulted by another female. And it took three male officers to finally restrain and arrest the attacker. If this isn’t a wake-up call for the Met Police to urgently review their training and tactics, I don’t know what is. Public safety is no place for weakness or politics. We need well-trained, resilient officers, regardless of gender,who can uphold the law and protect the public without becoming victims themselves. It’s time for serious reform. Enough is enough.

Harman Singh Kapoor

419,248 просмотров • 1 год назад

I do not believe for a second that the Nigeria Police Force Nigeria Police Force, under the illegal IGP Kayode Egbetokun, has any intention of withdrawing police officers from VIPs. This latest announcement is nothing more than a Christmas bonanza for the police hierarchy; the VIPs will double or even quadruple the "Christmas hampers" they give to officers in charge, and the cycle of preferential treatment will continue. Tinubu @offficialabat is not serious about the Nigeria Police reforming or redeeming itself; otherwise, he would never have granted an illegal tenure extension to Egbetokun, who is clearly incompetent. Suppose the government truly wants Nigerians to take this claim of withdrawal of police attachment to VIPs seriously, it must begin with transparency, the police must be forced to publish the complete list of VIPs currently enjoying police protection, state clearly how many officers are assigned to each individual or VIP groups, estates, companies, concubines, side chicks, and wherever, and publicly reassign those officers back to real police work across the country. Until that happens, this remains nothing but another dishonest pronouncement.
2:11

I do not believe for a second that the Nigeria Police Force Nigeria Police Force, under the illegal IGP Kayode Egbetokun, has any intention of withdrawing police officers from VIPs. This latest announcement is nothing more than a Christmas bonanza for the police hierarchy; the VIPs will double or even quadruple the "Christmas hampers" they give to officers in charge, and the cycle of preferential treatment will continue. Tinubu @offficialabat is not serious about the Nigeria Police reforming or redeeming itself; otherwise, he would never have granted an illegal tenure extension to Egbetokun, who is clearly incompetent. Suppose the government truly wants Nigerians to take this claim of withdrawal of police attachment to VIPs seriously, it must begin with transparency, the police must be forced to publish the complete list of VIPs currently enjoying police protection, state clearly how many officers are assigned to each individual or VIP groups, estates, companies, concubines, side chicks, and wherever, and publicly reassign those officers back to real police work across the country. Until that happens, this remains nothing but another dishonest pronouncement.

Omoyele Sowore

90,716 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Rick Rubin tells Andrew Huberman how he deals with creative or writer’s block. He treats his work like a diary entry (and doesn’t worry about internal or external judgment): ➡️ “What's the cause of the block? The block is usually something that's either personal ("I'm not good enough") or it can be a confidence issue ("I don't have anything to say") or it could be...thinking about someone else ("nobody's going to like what I make"). Do you know what I'm saying? So, it's either fear of self-judgment or external judgment. If you're making something with a freedom of "this is something I'm making for myself for now", that is all [you have to do]. It is a diary entry. Everything I make is a diary entry. The beauty of a diary entry is that I can write my diary entry and you can't tell me that my diary entry wasn't good enough. Or that [the diary entry] is not what I experienced. Of course it's what I experienced: I'm writing a personal diary for myself and no one else can judge if it is my experience of my life. Everything we make can be that: a personal reflection of who we are in that moment of time. It doesn't have to be the greatest you could ever do. It doesn't have to have any expectation that it's going to change the world. It doesn't have to sell a certain number of copies for any reason. It doesn't have any of those things at all. It is "I'm making this thing for me and I want to do it to the best of my ability and to where I feel good about it". [The work] is honest of where I'm at and if you're living in this world of just being honest to where you're at, there's nothing blocking you. There are no blocks. The blocks are all based on dealing with a different force or a different perception that is made up.” ⬅️
2:34

Rick Rubin tells Andrew Huberman how he deals with creative or writer’s block. He treats his work like a diary entry (and doesn’t worry about internal or external judgment): ➡️ “What's the cause of the block? The block is usually something that's either personal ("I'm not good enough") or it can be a confidence issue ("I don't have anything to say") or it could be...thinking about someone else ("nobody's going to like what I make"). Do you know what I'm saying? So, it's either fear of self-judgment or external judgment. If you're making something with a freedom of "this is something I'm making for myself for now", that is all [you have to do]. It is a diary entry. Everything I make is a diary entry. The beauty of a diary entry is that I can write my diary entry and you can't tell me that my diary entry wasn't good enough. Or that [the diary entry] is not what I experienced. Of course it's what I experienced: I'm writing a personal diary for myself and no one else can judge if it is my experience of my life. Everything we make can be that: a personal reflection of who we are in that moment of time. It doesn't have to be the greatest you could ever do. It doesn't have to have any expectation that it's going to change the world. It doesn't have to sell a certain number of copies for any reason. It doesn't have any of those things at all. It is "I'm making this thing for me and I want to do it to the best of my ability and to where I feel good about it". [The work] is honest of where I'm at and if you're living in this world of just being honest to where you're at, there's nothing blocking you. There are no blocks. The blocks are all based on dealing with a different force or a different perception that is made up.” ⬅️

Trung Phan

1,619,350 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Public protests are a form of free speech. We are not expected to agree with the messaging of every public protest (I often hate them). But, boil it down and we have a simple choice: 1. Let public protests take place ... and in some cases put up with some minor inconvenience. If things get unruly, well ... that's why we have a police force. 2. Use state power to say 'yes to this protest' but 'no to that protest' ... and then use state violence to physically stop all the illegal protests. This is what is known as a 'police state.' The Libertarian Party supports the adoption of a US style First Amendment in our state and federal constitutions: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO PEACEABLY TO ASSEMBLE AND TO PETITION THE GOVERNMENT FOR A REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES.' Libertarian Party NSW (formerly Liberal Democrats) Free Speech Union of Australia
5:09

Public protests are a form of free speech. We are not expected to agree with the messaging of every public protest (I often hate them). But, boil it down and we have a simple choice: 1. Let public protests take place ... and in some cases put up with some minor inconvenience. If things get unruly, well ... that's why we have a police force. 2. Use state power to say 'yes to this protest' but 'no to that protest' ... and then use state violence to physically stop all the illegal protests. This is what is known as a 'police state.' The Libertarian Party supports the adoption of a US style First Amendment in our state and federal constitutions: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO PEACEABLY TO ASSEMBLE AND TO PETITION THE GOVERNMENT FOR A REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES.' Libertarian Party NSW (formerly Liberal Democrats) Free Speech Union of Australia

John Ruddick MLC

61,618 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

I hate constraints and bullshit rules - and just because some WWE producer says, "clear" (meaning, we are no longer live on the air and the show is over) that doesn't mean I just stop whatever I'm doing and tell everyone great job. It fucking pissed me off. I can't shut my high emotions off just because a script says we're done. But even in this crazy fucking world of pro wrestling - this is a microcosm of a larger issue I have with individuals, corporations & governments - telling us what we can or can't do. You have to do it this way, you have to say it that way, or you'll get cancelled. They create fear if you have a different perspective and don't live by their rules. It's their way, or no way. Fuck that. I say it the way I want to say it. I do it the way I want to do it. My choice. Our choice. Fuck your "clear" - Final Boss
1:26

I hate constraints and bullshit rules - and just because some WWE producer says, "clear" (meaning, we are no longer live on the air and the show is over) that doesn't mean I just stop whatever I'm doing and tell everyone great job. It fucking pissed me off. I can't shut my high emotions off just because a script says we're done. But even in this crazy fucking world of pro wrestling - this is a microcosm of a larger issue I have with individuals, corporations & governments - telling us what we can or can't do. You have to do it this way, you have to say it that way, or you'll get cancelled. They create fear if you have a different perspective and don't live by their rules. It's their way, or no way. Fuck that. I say it the way I want to say it. I do it the way I want to do it. My choice. Our choice. Fuck your "clear" - Final Boss

Dwayne Johnson

8,081,476 просмотров • 2 лет назад

There is no provision in the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 that allows a traffic inspector or constable to physically assault a citizen. ⚖️ What the law actually allows Traffic police can: Stop vehicles for checking Verify documents (DL, RC, insurance, etc.) Issue challans or fines Detain a vehicle in certain violations But use of force is strictly limited and must follow legal procedure only in situations like self-defence or preventing a serious offence, and even then it must be reasonable and proportionate. 🚫 Assault is illegal If a police officer hits or assaults someone, it can amount to: Assault / hurt under the Indian Penal Code Misuse of power / misconduct under police service rules 🛑 What you can do Record the incident (if safe) Note badge number / vehicle number File a complaint with senior police officials Approach the State Human Rights Commission or court 👉 Authority does not give the right to violence. Even police are bound by law. Source: IG/ @nawazkhan_official_ #bengaluru #bangalore #roadfight #civicfailure ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು ನಗರ ಪೊಲೀಸ್‌ BengaluruCityPolice ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು ಸಂಚಾರ ಪೊಲೀಸ್ BengaluruTrafficPolice CP Bengaluru ಪೊಲೀಸ್ ಆಯುಕ್ತ ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು Joint CP, Traffic, Bengaluru alok kumar DGP KARNATAKA ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ರಾಜ್ಯ ಪೊಲೀಸ್ Karnataka State Police S. Lalitha ChristinMathewPhilip
0:35

There is no provision in the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 that allows a traffic inspector or constable to physically assault a citizen. ⚖️ What the law actually allows Traffic police can: Stop vehicles for checking Verify documents (DL, RC, insurance, etc.) Issue challans or fines Detain a vehicle in certain violations But use of force is strictly limited and must follow legal procedure only in situations like self-defence or preventing a serious offence, and even then it must be reasonable and proportionate. 🚫 Assault is illegal If a police officer hits or assaults someone, it can amount to: Assault / hurt under the Indian Penal Code Misuse of power / misconduct under police service rules 🛑 What you can do Record the incident (if safe) Note badge number / vehicle number File a complaint with senior police officials Approach the State Human Rights Commission or court 👉 Authority does not give the right to violence. Even police are bound by law. Source: IG/ @nawazkhan_official_ #bengaluru #bangalore #roadfight #civicfailure ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು ನಗರ ಪೊಲೀಸ್‌ BengaluruCityPolice ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು ಸಂಚಾರ ಪೊಲೀಸ್ BengaluruTrafficPolice CP Bengaluru ಪೊಲೀಸ್ ಆಯುಕ್ತ ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು Joint CP, Traffic, Bengaluru alok kumar DGP KARNATAKA ಕರ್ನಾಟಕ ರಾಜ್ಯ ಪೊಲೀಸ್ Karnataka State Police S. Lalitha ChristinMathewPhilip

Karnataka Portfolio

22,076 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

One thing I find amazing if that if Hindus do something similar in US, you would find a bunch of Hindus raining down upon them, making videos shaming them or saying this happened because of Modi. No one else does this on their own community/religion. And you wonder why Vivek apologizes for his religion. The reason Hindus come out in US public places with egregious displays of religiosity *now* is because others do it too. If anyone has a problem it’s “phobia”. 15 years ago, others didn’t. Neither did Hindus. It has nothing to do with “RSS” or “Modi”.
0:26

One thing I find amazing if that if Hindus do something similar in US, you would find a bunch of Hindus raining down upon them, making videos shaming them or saying this happened because of Modi. No one else does this on their own community/religion. And you wonder why Vivek apologizes for his religion. The reason Hindus come out in US public places with egregious displays of religiosity *now* is because others do it too. If anyone has a problem it’s “phobia”. 15 years ago, others didn’t. Neither did Hindus. It has nothing to do with “RSS” or “Modi”.

Arnab Ray

25,997 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

He wanted to save money and build his own fence. Measured it, set the posts, did the work himself, and put it right on his property. Now the HOA shows up with a letter saying it has to come down… because it’s not 8 inches off the property line. Eight. Inches. Not because it’s unsafe. Not because it’s ugly. Not because it’s on a neighbor’s land. But because it doesn’t meet a rule in a handbook most people forget exists after closing day. This is where a lot of homeowners get frustrated. You buy the house. You pay the mortgage. You pay the taxes. You maintain the yard. But an HOA can still tell you how far a fence has to sit from a line no one can even see. Should HOAs really have this kind of say over what you do on your own property? The video may or may depict actual events; it may or may not include AI
1:08

He wanted to save money and build his own fence. Measured it, set the posts, did the work himself, and put it right on his property. Now the HOA shows up with a letter saying it has to come down… because it’s not 8 inches off the property line. Eight. Inches. Not because it’s unsafe. Not because it’s ugly. Not because it’s on a neighbor’s land. But because it doesn’t meet a rule in a handbook most people forget exists after closing day. This is where a lot of homeowners get frustrated. You buy the house. You pay the mortgage. You pay the taxes. You maintain the yard. But an HOA can still tell you how far a fence has to sit from a line no one can even see. Should HOAs really have this kind of say over what you do on your own property? The video may or may depict actual events; it may or may not include AI

TheRealCherokeeOwl 🦉

5,175,798 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨THIS IS HOW WE FIGHT BACK AGAINST ICE… SHARE THIS! My friend Mohini is suing ICE. Because what’s happening right now isn’t due to “one bad agent”… it’s happening by design. People with legal status… detained. People with pending cases… taken. Even U.S. citizens are being arrested. And people are being brutalized by agents with no consequences. And this administration thinks they can get away with it. Which is why this lawsuit is so important. If you, or someone you know, has been: - wrongfully detained - targeted without cause - abused in custody - or had your rights violated by ICE 📞 Call the number in the comments (Or fill out the form.) Even if you’re unsure, reach out anyway. Because the only way this stops is if people speak up. And the truth is… what I post here, daily? It’s just a fraction of what’s actually happening. So, PLEASE share this… Send it to someone who needs it. Drop it in group chats. Share it on other socials. Because silence is exactly what they’re counting on… And we’re done giving them that.
0:23

🚨THIS IS HOW WE FIGHT BACK AGAINST ICE… SHARE THIS! My friend Mohini is suing ICE. Because what’s happening right now isn’t due to “one bad agent”… it’s happening by design. People with legal status… detained. People with pending cases… taken. Even U.S. citizens are being arrested. And people are being brutalized by agents with no consequences. And this administration thinks they can get away with it. Which is why this lawsuit is so important. If you, or someone you know, has been: - wrongfully detained - targeted without cause - abused in custody - or had your rights violated by ICE 📞 Call the number in the comments (Or fill out the form.) Even if you’re unsure, reach out anyway. Because the only way this stops is if people speak up. And the truth is… what I post here, daily? It’s just a fraction of what’s actually happening. So, PLEASE share this… Send it to someone who needs it. Drop it in group chats. Share it on other socials. Because silence is exactly what they’re counting on… And we’re done giving them that.

Jesus Freakin Congress

37,823 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Todays stream will be fun. So a few fellas on Twitter made this video and then posted it to desperately make me sound like a fool. This gun even explained it in “layman’s terms” in an act of kindness to even penetrate the deranged grift motivated shell of a failed and frankly retarded former comedian. Take note of the specific claims. It’s why wizards just attack, use in group intentionally confusing language, and avoid any potential falsification scenarios. Fortunately this specific video is relatively clear with claims. 1 the earth moves under an object once it no longer is “connected” to the ground. So the claim in layman’s terms means that the atmosphere and air surrounding the earth is not connected to the spin of the earth. Since the bullet clearly never leaves the atmosphere. 2 distance is “1000.” Rather that’s feet or meters it doesn’t matter. A major mistake by a wizard is staring any actual testable number. This ensures that once shown to be false they can’t just claim scale issues. It’s 1000. Not a billion, not a trillion. 1000. 3 direction matters but no mention of latitude. Since the earth spins 1000 mph at equator and 0 mph at the North Pole according to the current mainstream globe model, the latitude you are standing on would change the magnitude of coriolis effect by orders or magnitude regardless of direction. 4 the gun specialist doesn’t explain or calculate what the margin of error is for any shot at that distance with that gun and that specific round. And he has the ability to edit the video any way he sees fit. This gentlemen being demonstrably wrong does not disprove a globe or prove a flat non moving plane. It just disproves the evidence as stated by this man of Coriolis effect. The 24 hour sun in Antarctica does not disprove flat non moving plane or prove spinning ball. It just removes the potential argument for flat earthers and adds credibility to people who claim it would be 24 hours. None of this is personal it’s just a discussion on logic, claims, discernment, and the scientific method. If you are angry or scared by this or you just want to assume my intention and mock then you are of very little use to adult discussion. That includes flat earthers who are now claiming witsit is a clone. It’s pathetic narcissistic behavior. 1230 pm pst
2:46

Todays stream will be fun. So a few fellas on Twitter made this video and then posted it to desperately make me sound like a fool. This gun even explained it in “layman’s terms” in an act of kindness to even penetrate the deranged grift motivated shell of a failed and frankly retarded former comedian. Take note of the specific claims. It’s why wizards just attack, use in group intentionally confusing language, and avoid any potential falsification scenarios. Fortunately this specific video is relatively clear with claims. 1 the earth moves under an object once it no longer is “connected” to the ground. So the claim in layman’s terms means that the atmosphere and air surrounding the earth is not connected to the spin of the earth. Since the bullet clearly never leaves the atmosphere. 2 distance is “1000.” Rather that’s feet or meters it doesn’t matter. A major mistake by a wizard is staring any actual testable number. This ensures that once shown to be false they can’t just claim scale issues. It’s 1000. Not a billion, not a trillion. 1000. 3 direction matters but no mention of latitude. Since the earth spins 1000 mph at equator and 0 mph at the North Pole according to the current mainstream globe model, the latitude you are standing on would change the magnitude of coriolis effect by orders or magnitude regardless of direction. 4 the gun specialist doesn’t explain or calculate what the margin of error is for any shot at that distance with that gun and that specific round. And he has the ability to edit the video any way he sees fit. This gentlemen being demonstrably wrong does not disprove a globe or prove a flat non moving plane. It just disproves the evidence as stated by this man of Coriolis effect. The 24 hour sun in Antarctica does not disprove flat non moving plane or prove spinning ball. It just removes the potential argument for flat earthers and adds credibility to people who claim it would be 24 hours. None of this is personal it’s just a discussion on logic, claims, discernment, and the scientific method. If you are angry or scared by this or you just want to assume my intention and mock then you are of very little use to adult discussion. That includes flat earthers who are now claiming witsit is a clone. It’s pathetic narcissistic behavior. 1230 pm pst

Owen Benjamin 🐻

16,924 просмотров • 1 год назад

Police understandably want to keep the peace with minimal friction or risk of escalation. Unfortunately, that can sometimes come at the expense of protecting other citizens’ rights. It is not appropriate to acquiesce to activists’ demands to exclude journalists from documenting a publicly advertised event held in a public park— here, an anti-Canada rally on Canada Day. This is not only hypocritical, given these activists’ own track record of disrupting public order through protests and counterprotests, but it also rewards intimidation and violence. While we have no desire to make police work any harder or more dangerous than it already is, we cannot simply agree to leave because Antifa says so. 📸 Jul 1, 2026 #Toronto #ProtestMania
1:40

Police understandably want to keep the peace with minimal friction or risk of escalation. Unfortunately, that can sometimes come at the expense of protecting other citizens’ rights. It is not appropriate to acquiesce to activists’ demands to exclude journalists from documenting a publicly advertised event held in a public park— here, an anti-Canada rally on Canada Day. This is not only hypocritical, given these activists’ own track record of disrupting public order through protests and counterprotests, but it also rewards intimidation and violence. While we have no desire to make police work any harder or more dangerous than it already is, we cannot simply agree to leave because Antifa says so. 📸 Jul 1, 2026 #Toronto #ProtestMania

Caryma Sa'd - Lawyer + Political Satirist

10,956 просмотров • 14 дней назад

🚨I have received reports of threats made against this Garda on social media. Even though he has been online for the wrong reasons in the past as you will see. I do not condone any violence or illegal activity on this channel or in my name. Please keep it peaceful or you will only play into their hands. This story is newsworthy and is of public interest and we have a right to know the calibre of the people who are employed in our police force. If you would like to support my work see links below.
2:06

🚨I have received reports of threats made against this Garda on social media. Even though he has been online for the wrong reasons in the past as you will see. I do not condone any violence or illegal activity on this channel or in my name. Please keep it peaceful or you will only play into their hands. This story is newsworthy and is of public interest and we have a right to know the calibre of the people who are employed in our police force. If you would like to support my work see links below.

Philip Dwyer

110,724 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

First, LGBTQ identity cannot be used to justify or excuse inappropriate physical contact. Sexual orientation is part of a person’s identity, but it is unrelated to behavioral boundaries. In any public or professional setting, physical interaction must always be based on clear consent and established rules, not justified by identity, familiarity, or personal relationships. Second, framing public criticism as “fans being jealous” is a distortion of the issue and a deflection from the core point. The focus of public concern has never been competition or emotional conflict, but whether basic professional standards and boundaries were respected. Reducing legitimate concerns to “jealousy” is a way of avoiding accountability. At its core, this issue is not about identity labels or public sentiment, but about a fundamental principle: all interactions must be based on respect for boundaries and clear consent. When this principle is ignored or blurred, public concern is both reasonable and necessary.
3:47

First, LGBTQ identity cannot be used to justify or excuse inappropriate physical contact. Sexual orientation is part of a person’s identity, but it is unrelated to behavioral boundaries. In any public or professional setting, physical interaction must always be based on clear consent and established rules, not justified by identity, familiarity, or personal relationships. Second, framing public criticism as “fans being jealous” is a distortion of the issue and a deflection from the core point. The focus of public concern has never been competition or emotional conflict, but whether basic professional standards and boundaries were respected. Reducing legitimate concerns to “jealousy” is a way of avoiding accountability. At its core, this issue is not about identity labels or public sentiment, but about a fundamental principle: all interactions must be based on respect for boundaries and clear consent. When this principle is ignored or blurred, public concern is both reasonable and necessary.

T’Amore_Stay With Namtan

222,373 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨 THE PUBLIC HAS HAD ENOUGH — POLICE MUST FOLLOW THE LAW LIKE EVERYONE ELSE Across the UK, more and more officers are refusing to show their warrant cards when asked — and the public is rightly pushing back. Let’s be absolutely clear: If an officer is not in uniform, they MUST show their warrant card. If they are in uniform, they SHOULD show it when asked — it’s not optional “courtesy.” It’s professional obligation. When exercising stop-and-search powers, they MUST identify themselves properly, including name or number and station. This isn’t about being “anti-police.” This is about the rule of law — the same law the police claim to uphold. A badge, a uniform, a vest — none of these replace lawful identification. And in a time when trust in policing is collapsing, refusing to identify yourself only fuels suspicion. The public has EVERY right to: • Ask for identification • Record the interaction • Refuse compliance until the officer identifies themselves • File formal complaints if they don’t No one in this country — not even the police — is above accountability. If officers want the respect of the public, then they must follow the law to the letter. Because the rule of law either protects all of us — or it protects none of us. @MartinGauci
2:13

🚨 THE PUBLIC HAS HAD ENOUGH — POLICE MUST FOLLOW THE LAW LIKE EVERYONE ELSE Across the UK, more and more officers are refusing to show their warrant cards when asked — and the public is rightly pushing back. Let’s be absolutely clear: If an officer is not in uniform, they MUST show their warrant card. If they are in uniform, they SHOULD show it when asked — it’s not optional “courtesy.” It’s professional obligation. When exercising stop-and-search powers, they MUST identify themselves properly, including name or number and station. This isn’t about being “anti-police.” This is about the rule of law — the same law the police claim to uphold. A badge, a uniform, a vest — none of these replace lawful identification. And in a time when trust in policing is collapsing, refusing to identify yourself only fuels suspicion. The public has EVERY right to: • Ask for identification • Record the interaction • Refuse compliance until the officer identifies themselves • File formal complaints if they don’t No one in this country — not even the police — is above accountability. If officers want the respect of the public, then they must follow the law to the letter. Because the rule of law either protects all of us — or it protects none of us. @MartinGauci

Jim Ferguson

206,918 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Scott Jennings brings the screeching CNN panel back down to earth with a cold dose of common sense on the Iran deal. JENNINGS: “Look, my view of the Iranians, is this.” “A, I don’t like the idea of them having any financial relief because they take money and then they put it into terrorism.” “Number two, I don’t think you can trust the Iranians.” “Number three, I don’t think an Iranian signature is worth all that much...” “The ONE and ONLY thing that I’ve ever wanted out of any of this was that they cannot have or ever get a nuclear weapon.” “That’s been the president’s top objective. I trust the president on that, and I know that’s what he wants out of the deal.” “If we end up doing things, though, that on the back end enable them to do any kind of rebuilding of any terror network, or any ability to terrorize us or anyone else, I would not be happy with it.”
0:36

Scott Jennings brings the screeching CNN panel back down to earth with a cold dose of common sense on the Iran deal. JENNINGS: “Look, my view of the Iranians, is this.” “A, I don’t like the idea of them having any financial relief because they take money and then they put it into terrorism.” “Number two, I don’t think you can trust the Iranians.” “Number three, I don’t think an Iranian signature is worth all that much...” “The ONE and ONLY thing that I’ve ever wanted out of any of this was that they cannot have or ever get a nuclear weapon.” “That’s been the president’s top objective. I trust the president on that, and I know that’s what he wants out of the deal.” “If we end up doing things, though, that on the back end enable them to do any kind of rebuilding of any terror network, or any ability to terrorize us or anyone else, I would not be happy with it.”

Overton

54,269 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

No Apologies, My Comment Not Targeted At Anyone or Any Region I have no reasons to say derogatory things about anyone, not even the North, not the South. What I said was very clear. I said I visited a State in the North, I didn't mention the State. And I gave an illustration that I got talking to a Gateman who said to me that he had four wives and 16 children. And I said what can the government do about such a person? What can government do about a Gateman with four wives and 16 children? That illustration is not about the North, it could be anyone in the Southwest, Southeast or South-South. Some people are saying I should apologize, and I want to state that I have no apology because I have not offended anyone. My point is, the nation needs to address the issue of its population, either North, South or anywhere. It is regrettable that people like to pervert the truth and quote others out of context. Majority of those who have reacted to that interview did not even watch it, they didn't also bother to see the video. Therefore, I can't be bothered about the anger of anyone. I have no reasons to be derogatory about anyone, any region or group.
2:18

No Apologies, My Comment Not Targeted At Anyone or Any Region I have no reasons to say derogatory things about anyone, not even the North, not the South. What I said was very clear. I said I visited a State in the North, I didn't mention the State. And I gave an illustration that I got talking to a Gateman who said to me that he had four wives and 16 children. And I said what can the government do about such a person? What can government do about a Gateman with four wives and 16 children? That illustration is not about the North, it could be anyone in the Southwest, Southeast or South-South. Some people are saying I should apologize, and I want to state that I have no apology because I have not offended anyone. My point is, the nation needs to address the issue of its population, either North, South or anywhere. It is regrettable that people like to pervert the truth and quote others out of context. Majority of those who have reacted to that interview did not even watch it, they didn't also bother to see the video. Therefore, I can't be bothered about the anger of anyone. I have no reasons to be derogatory about anyone, any region or group.

Peter Ayodele Fayose

258,664 просмотров • 1 год назад