Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Tim Dillon: “Does your source—who’s a highly-placed Trump confidant—believe there’s any potential that forces outside of this gunman were responsible for Charlie Kirk’s assassination?” Max Blumenthal: “Yes.” “They don’t accept the official story.” Dillon: “A highly-placed person in the Trump inner circle doesn’t believe the official story of Charlie's...

1,039,493 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

.Bari Weiss in her CBS Mornings debut, promoting her town hall tomorrow with Erika Kirk and taking aim at those who celebrated Charlie’s assassination and the conspiracy theorists claiming she had something to do it... “I think Erika Kirk is a victim of what could be a very, very disturbing version of America. In other words, her husband was speaking on a college campus. Whether you agreed with him or not, he was practicing the most fundamental of American rights, he was trying to persuade people with words and then he got a bullet to his neck as he was speaking to someone that disagreed with him. Someone, by the way, who was in the audience that night. In the days and weeks that followed, the number of people in this country and not just lunatics on the internet hiding behind anonymous accounts, but prominent people justified his death with the idea that words are violence rather than violence being violence signifies something quite alarming. The idea that he somehow had it coming because people disagreed with him.” “The second thing is that in — he was murdered three months ago. If you go on the internet and frankly it is leapt beyond the internet into real life and you talk to many seemingly sane people, they do not believe that the 22-year-old named Tyler Robinson that has been arrested and charged with his murder is the actual murderer. “They believe any number of theories. They believe Erika Kirk was his Mossad handler and he was killed by a foreign government. They believe she was tracked by Egyptian planes. They believe that the rings on her hand are signs of illuminati. The theories themselves are absurd. What matters is that because — she speaks about this in the interview, the brain rot that social media is allowing to spread, the way that it is detaching us from humanity, from our ability to talk to one another and our ability to discern the truth from just out and out lies is something that is incredibly important as a theme, I think. So, she was able to speak to both of those things in a way that’s incredibly compelling.”

Curtis Houck

78,679 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

CNN’s Kristen Holmes: “I just want to point out one thing before we get into the power and influential person that Charlie Kirk was..not just a political activist. He was also a father and a husband. And you have to remember something when you talk about Donald Trump's campaign and the team that got him elected, it was a very small, very tight knit group of people. It was loyalists, people who were gathered around Donald Trump working in and out every day. And Charlie Kirk was part of that movement. So, when you're talking to these White House advisers and staffers and friends of the President, it's not just them looking at the death of an icon and a movement leader, as we've heard, it's also them looking at the death of a very close friend and somebody they spent an enormous amount of time with...[T]hat's why you're seeing such a sadness and a disbelief from so many people close to the President. And when it comes to talking strictly about his influence and his power within Washington, I mean, one of the things to keep in mind here is that this is somebody who had a direct line to President Trump who could voice his objections to President Trump at times, he could voice what he thought was important and not being covered enough by the administration. He spoke to many, if not all, of the cabinet secretaries directly. He had a finger on the pulse of the MAGA movement, even more so than some people who are here in Washington who got government positions. If you look at the crowd that had gathered around Kirk, that was just one example of the kind of crowds that Kirk would draw. He was truly a movement leader, as we've heard. He would bring thousands and thousands of people together, and that was why he was so critical beyond just the personal to the campaign to President Trump...So, there are a lot of different levels of all of this. The influence, the power, the — the connection to the base, but also the family and the relationships that Charlie Kirk had built with all of the Trumps. We have seen the children responding each individually about their relationships with Charlie Kirk saying to pray for him and his family.”

Curtis Houck

1,160,867 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Tucker Carlson reveals Charlie Kirk’s greatest “sin” — the one that cost him his life. Kirk’s death has clearly lit a fire under Carlson. This is two minutes of Tucker at his absolute best. “Charlie was not a Nazi. He was not killed because he was a Nazi. Yes, he was a defender of Israel. He didn’t die for Israel. However, why did he die? What was his life about? What was the sin, the core sin that Charlie Kirk committed against somebody, power that got him killed in the end? “And, the answer is right in front of us, certainly those of us who knew him. Charlie’s life was defined by his Christian faith, not his spirituality, but his belief in Jesus, his life as a Christian. Everything in his life flowed from those beliefs. Everything. “Everything he did, said and believed came from the fact that he was above all, a Christian. And that is and was and in fact has always been deeply provocative and offensive to the rest of the world. “And why is that? It’s worth thinking about it for just a second. Christianity doesn’t seem like the kind of religion that provoke people to anger and violence. In fact, it seems just the opposite. It’s the world’s most profoundly nonviolent religion. Maybe the world’s only truly nonviolent religion, a religion based on a man who Christians believe was also God, who, as he was being led away to be tortured to death on made up charges, scolded one of his disciples for fighting back. “This is a religion committed to love above all and to living in peace and harmony. Truly, it’s a universalist religion that believes that every person has a shot at heaven. It’s not exclusionary at all. And so you would think it would make sense that if you’re a government or if you’re in power, that you’d want a lot of Christians living in your country because they’re not going to cause massive problems. “Not a lot of sincere Christians are fomenting insurrection at any given moment. Pretty much none. Most of the time they’re tidy. They get married, they love their children, they pay their taxes. They’re commanded to pay their taxes. So why wouldn’t you want a nation full of Christians? “Why wouldn’t you encourage this religious belief, even if it wasn’t yours? Why would you hate it? Well, there are a couple of reasons. There are a couple of things about Christianity, and these were evident throughout Charlie’s public life, that are deeply provocative to the people in power. “And the first is the insistence that Christianity comes with inherently that you are not God, you are not God and neither are your leaders. God is God and all of us stand before him in the end to be judged and all of us will be found lacking. “Christians believe the only way to heaven is through Jesus. That’s the only way. But all of us, whether we believe in Jesus or not, are fallen. We are sinners, we are less than we ought to be. We are not gods, and neither are the people who lead us.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

941,794 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Max Blumenthal unpacks the ludicrous details of the FBI's "not credible" investigation into Charlie Kirk's assassination. "We're at a point where anyone...who's paying close attention, who isn't invested in the TPUSA–MAGA franchise, is not going to believe the official story" This clip of Max Blumenthal (Max Blumenthal), founder and editor-in-chief of The Grayzone, is taken from an interview with Dave Smith (Dave Smith) posted to Smith's YouTube channel today, September 22, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "I don't have any evidence that of an Israeli government or Israeli role in Charlie Kirk's killing. I just stick to the facts. That's why I'm still here. The reason that people, that this resonates, the idea that Israel played a role resonates, is Netanyahu himself and Israel in general maintain power through lying, manipulation, intimidation and assassination. Especially assassination. "And Netanyahu rose to power after the killing of Yitzhak Rabin, his, his main political rival. And Leah Rabin, Rabin's wife, said Netanyahu incited his murder. Netanyahu marched in front of a mock coffin that said Rabin on it just days before the murder. I mean, and, and then Netanyahu's coalition partners, Ben gvir, etcetera, they are like the spiritual heirs of Yigal Amir who assassinated Rabin. "So this is like Netanyahu's M.O. he just tried to assassinate the entire negotiating team of HAMAS Inside a U.S. ally. And Israel has global assassination squads. But you know what they would have done and what they were planning to do, and you could already see Laura Loomer rolling out the campaign, was to character assassinate Charlie Kirk if he continued to go off message. That's what they do. That's what they did to me. "And you know, if I got like an op ed in the New York Times, not that I would want to, they would try to destroy my reputation. That's what they're doing to Candace Owens. Like, I don't believe they're going to send a sniper to take out Candace Owens, but I hope she has good security because, you know, they could, they want, they, maybe they want to inspire some vigilante or something. "But it's not like the Mossad's M.O. to go inside a U.S. ally and do this. At the same time. There's a, there's another reason why nobody. Why, why people are spinning out their own theories. And I don't want to attack these people. "Actually, like, I think, you know, people should be asking questions. We are not witnessing a credible investigation into Charlie Kurt's killing. Starting with the text messages, the exchange between this shooter, Tyler Robinson and his supposed furry trans lover roommate. They read like something written by a 65 year old federal law enforcement officer. "The words being used are something I've never heard 22 year old people using even as a Gen Xer when I was 22, nobody said, I'm going to retrieve the weapon from the vehicle and leave it at the drop point. Andrew Kolvet yesterday declaring that there's no exit wound because Charlie Kirk had a spine of steel. That doesn't inspire confidence. He's told that by the ER doctor. And shouldn't the ER doctor be telling the media or the FBI should be telling the media that that's why there's no exit wound. Why are we learning that from basically the spokesman for Charlie Kirk? "Now we're hearing it was a World War I era, I think, I guess Mauser rifle and it. So therefore it didn't have a serial number. Unusual, the removal of the camera from behind Charlie Kirk. Again, this isn't, this is like what people are talking about. This is what the Internet's talking about. I'm not just like trying to present to you the theory of the crime. "But a staffer for TPUSA removed a camera that was filming behind Charlie Kirk, which would provide a lot of, I think visual context on where the shot came from, and removed the SD cards. And Andrew Kolvet goes out and says he did the right thing in the middle of a crime scene to remove the SD cards. And the FBI has the footage. But he know he's someone who loved Charlie Kirk. I don't know what the FBI is saying about this. "There, there are so many other odd issues here. The photo of Tyler Robinson at the Dairy Queen 15 minutes after the shooting. The comments by law, federal law enforcement that Tyler Robinson took one minute on the roof to carry out this operation, which I think would be difficult to do even for a professional sniper. And the jerking of Charlie Kirk's head. I guess he's hit. He's. According to the. I guess the official version is he's hit from the front on the left side of his neck, but his head jerks that way. And so many people are formulating the theory that he was actually shot from behind to his right. "And so we're at a point where anyone who's paying attention, who's paying close attention, who isn't like invested in the TPUSA MAGA franchise is not going to believe the official story at this point. And there have just been so many failures on the part of Kash Patel and the FBI as well. So the theories are going to continue to abound and some of them will focus on Israel. And it really doesn't help to have Netanyahu go out twice, first on Newsmax, which is a vehicle for Israeli influence, taking money from the Israeli Foreign Ministry, and then on his own personal prime minister channel to deny killing Charlie Kirk. Like, when have you ever seen a foreign leader just on his own voluntarily deny killing a major U.S. Public figure? It's just a little weird."

Sense Receptor

30,103 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Rep. Jasmine Crockett is now claiming that Charlie Kirk’s “rhetoric” was racist...and not only did she vote against the House resolution to honor him, she’s furious that MORE Democrats didn’t do the same. She’s now openly attacking the “Caucasians” in her own party who supported the resolution. What a sick and vile human being. “One of the things I do want to point out that’s not been laid out, that honestly hurts my heart, is when I saw the no votes, there were only two caucasians.” “For the most part, the only people that voted no were people of color.” “Because the rhetoric that Charlie Kirk continuously put out, there was rhetoric that specifically targeted people of color.” “And so it is unfortunate that even our colleagues could not see how harmful his rhetoric was specifically to us.” “And I can tell you that a month prior to him passing away, he had actually gotten out on his podcast, I wasn’t aware of this at the time, but he got out there and he was talking negatively about me directly.” “So if there was any way that I was going to honor somebody who decided that they were just going to negatively talk about me and proclaim that I was somehow involved in the great white replacement, yeah, I’m not honoring that kind of stuff.” “So to me, just like we wanted to make sure that those confederate relics were taken down, the idea of a new age relic being propped up was something that I just could not subscribe to, and it is unfortunate that more of my colleagues, even on my side of the aisle, could not see the the amount of harm that this man was attempting to inflict upon our communities.” Disgraceful.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

576,377 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten