Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Tim Pool just pointed out the one major difference between the right and the left when it comes to political violence. And what Tim Pool exposed is only going to get worse as more so-called “moderate” Democrats embrace the rhetoric that fuels it. “I want to make a point….we...

115,795 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Tim Dillon: “Does your source—who’s a highly-placed Trump confidant—believe there’s any potential that forces outside of this gunman were responsible for Charlie Kirk’s assassination?” Max Blumenthal: “Yes.” “They don’t accept the official story.” Dillon: “A highly-placed person in the Trump inner circle doesn’t believe the official story of Charlie's murder?” Blumenthal: “No one does, but the phrase I remember hearing is, ‘it feels like there’s more at play here.’” “That’s not the only person with more power than me in Washington that I’m hearing that from.” Dillon: “So you’re hearing from multiple people that are connected and tapped in, that they believe that there’s more at play or more to the story than simply one radicalized young man?” Blumenthal: “Subsequent to publishing this story from another source who I would describe as an Administration insider, that corroborated the account in this story.” “First, that, Charlie Kirk was actively and aggressively personally lobbying Trump against bombing Iran in June.” “Two, that right now the FBI is not being forthcoming and there’s a lot of frustration with the FBI not sharing information.” Dillon: “That’s pretty shocking.” Blumenthal: “There was this pre-fabricated narrative on the right that the killer was a leftist or a Muslim.” “They clearly wanted that.” “Now, people on the left are saying he was a groyper.” “I don’t know what will be the case, but the reason I wrote this story was because I was able to get this background about Charlie Kirk and … what was coloring his final days, and the kind of pressure he was under—which tells a larger story about Israeli influence in the US.” “I didn’t report this story to prove that Israel has a direct role in his assassination.” “But there is a real reason why many people who are not able to talk to people with any proximity to power believe that is the case, and it’s because of the way Israel’s conducting itself around the globe.” Tim Dillon Max Blumenthal

Holden Culotta

1,039,493 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

MORE OF THIS, PLEASE: Important comments from CBS News editor-in-chief Bari Weiss to colleague Vladimir Duthiers about having conversations with those we disagree with, even if you may think someone is controversial and wrong... CBS’s Vladimir Duthiers: “So, Bari, when I introduced you to the audience, you said something incredibly powerful. We have to get to a place in this country where we can have discussions with people we vehemently disagree with. Charlie Kirk was controversial in his life. Some of his critics called his organization racist, xenophobic, sexist, homophobic. Which you asked Erika about and I want to play a little bit of that for our viewers.” [Town Hall clip] Duthiers: “So, Bari, what do you say to those who argue it’s harmful to platform a guy like Charlie Kirk, Turning Point USA and even his widow, even though she’s grieving some critics have addressed that with you?” Bari Weiss: “Yeah, I mean I just fundamentally disagree with the idea that we shouldn’t be able to speak across divides. That doesn’t mean that there are not lines. The question, of course, is whether or not Charlie Kirk crossed those lines and in my view, you hear me quote many of the controversial things he said — needless to say, there are many things Charlie Kirk said in his life that I vehemently disagree with, but, to me, that’s not the point. The point is that we are walking into an abyss as a country if we accept the idea that words are violence, but violence, if directed at the right targets, is acceptable. I fundamentally reject that world view. The entire point of our democracy, the whole premise of it as we’re entering our 250th year is that we solve our problems by persuasion. We solve our problems by talking to one another. We don’t solve our problems by shooting one another in the neck as happened that day at that Utah college and so, to me ,especially as we’re living in a world where you can live next door to someone and if you have different things on your social media feed, you can live in a different reality, and so, the point of this conversation, even if it makes some people uncomfortable, even if they disagree with something they heard on stage, I disagreed with some I heard on stage. The point, that’s the whole nature of the democratic process and this conversation and this whole series that we’re going to be announcing in the coming days, the point is to revive that in a moment this country needs it. More thank ever.”

Curtis Houck

257,495 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

What the hell do we do now? Where do we go from here? What happens next? Who is supposed to pick up the microphone? No one will ever be able to fill Charlie’s shoes. No one. But I can’t think of anything that would fill his heart and make him prouder than the generation he inspired to pick up the torch and carry it forward. To continue this mission he gave his life for to speak the truth and to fight against evil, to fill the hearts of the world with courage and the love of God. This is the Turning Point of our time. I don’t even know if Charlie intended for that name to pack such a punch, and maybe it seems even more important now, but amid the expected and disgusting hate comments in the wake of Charlie’s death, I am floored and inspired all over again by the thousands of posts I’ve seen from our generation saying that this is their personal awakening to get in the arena, to be on the frontlines of this culture war, and to speak out in courage no matter what the backlash that comes next might look like. And I guess that’s the answer. Who picks up the microphone from here? Who keeps speaking the truth when the world needs it the most? Who keeps pushing back against evil? YOU. You do. We do. Charlie always believed this - that anyone from anywhere can inspire the world if they just have the courage to do it. I have to believe that Charlie lit the spark that will spark a wildfire in this movement. A movement not just to fix our political system or revive the American Dream, but so much bigger. To change culture. To seek and speak truth. To love God authentically and share that love with the world. To transform humanity as Salt and Light through every action we take. For you, Charlie. Charlie Kirk Turning Point USA TPUSA Students

Isabel Brown

1,315,058 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

ALEX KARP: THE DEMS ARE DESTROYING THEMSELVES BY TRYING TO FIGHT DOGE AND ELON “What I don't like about what's going on is that we're just watching the Democratic Party commit suicide. I've been a Democrat most of my life. I view myself as outside it, but I don't like watching the Democrats just commit suicide. At this point, given the fraud, waste and abuse we know is there, 90% of the country's like, get rid of that fraud, waste and abuse. I just view this as yet another example of the progressive left boxing themselves in into a suicide dance. What the progressive left should be doing is saying, okay, Elon, you're clearly the most qualified person in the world to do something like this. We want a dialogue with you about how you're doing and what you're doing. I don't believe that actually happened. I like Elon. I think he's obviously the most important builder in the world. But I don't believe my former side is actually engaging. What is the biggest problem in this society? From my perspective, it's the legitimacy of our institutions. Why aren't they legitimate? Do any of you really believe that 99% of your taxpayer dollars are being [well] spent? There are two revolutions happening. One is transparency, and one is AI. So, why is it that we do not know where every penny of our money goes? Slightly more technically, what large language models do is they mean you can go into the contracts and see exactly what happened. In the past, we couldn't do this. Now we can. The right response is that we want this to happen. We want to be involved in the dialogue. But it feels like the people criticizing Elon don't want it to happen, and this is going to destroy those people.” Source: CNN, February 18, 2025

Mario Nawfal

363,871 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Hayes: Endorsing against incumbents really is kind of the unwritten rule in this. Tish James, who was a very vocal backer of yours when you were running for mayor—and even a backer of yours when I think it was pretty politically controversial to be so—had this to say. She said she and other political leaders she’s spoken to are disappointed in Zohran Mamdani. “All of us are a little frustrated with the Democratic Party, but you don’t blow it up. That’s what MAGA has done.” What do you say to that? Mamdani: I think, what is the Democratic Party if not its voters? And what we saw yesterday evening were Democrats across the city turning out and voting for a new kind of politics. And I’ve been clear time and time again that I believe the only majority in our country is that of the working class. And what we saw is that a focus on the working class. And I have a deep amount of respect for my friend, Attorney General James. And I also believe that these are the kinds of candidates that we need to see in Congress, as well as the five state legislative candidates that I endorsed that also won yesterday evening. I made a promise to New Yorkers that I would use every tool at my disposal to actually transform this city into one that they could afford. And one of those tools is using your political capital to ensure that the people who will fight hardest for that same agenda are going to be there, whether it’s in Albany or whether it’s in D.C.

Acyn

1,543,683 Aufrufe • vor 17 Tagen

CNN’s David Axelrod: “We can go one of two ways in this country. We can, embrace this notion that somehow we're at war and where there'll be more killing and more violence. Or we can learn from this moment. I — you mentioned history. I was a kid when, we went through a period of assassination in the 1960s. I remember when Martin Luther king was killed. Robert Kennedy went onto the streets of Indianapolis. He was a candidate for president at that time and it was very, very dangerous, frankly, for him to be out there. But he insisted on going, and he spoke to the crowd and he finished and I wanted to share this. He finished with a poem by Aeschylus, the ancient Greek poet. And it was, “even in our sleep pain which cannot forget falls drop by, drop upon the heart, until in our own despair, against our will comes wisdom through the awful grace of God.” The question is, have we seen enough to embrace wisdom here and recognize that this is not a path that we want to go as a country? And let's be clear, I heard what those folks said. We've had political assassinations of Democrats and Republicans of the left and the right. This is not something that is exclusive to one or the other, but I will say, if we continue to embrace this notion that if we disagree that we're not only political opponents, but you are an enemy, you are an evil. You want to destroy the country. You want to destroy our way of life. That is a prescription for disaster.”

Curtis Houck

1,431,597 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

I shared a video from Nick Freitas yesterday about how to encourage and reach young men. You should check it out if you didn’t see it. Now, here is a clip that shows how to repel and discourage young men. This is so frustrating, Sean DeMars and Neil Shenvi. Leaving aside the whole “woke right” thing, whatever. You acknowledge that the Left has total cultural control. Then you mock the idea that white men are systemically discriminated against in our culture, or that we live in an effeminate gynocracy. What do you think the Left does with its total cultural control? You mock young men by claiming that their discrimination has no basis in reality, but has to be understood via some “gnostic” higher knowledge. This is not fair. We are starting to get more and more hard data on this issue. I will admit that there is an element of “look around, this should be obvious.” It should be, and you’re really sticking your head in the sand to deny these things. But being on the Right is to believe in God’s created reality. It’s not about “lived experience,” it’s about what is actually true. White men are being discriminated against in this culture, and the West has been feminized radically in the last 60 years. The biggest problem with the woke was always that they were wrong, beyond even their philosophical system. It wasn’t merely that they were claiming to be oppressed, but it was that this claim was wrong. "This argument sounds like that argument" is just so lazy when one was factually wrong, and one is factually right. The claims of the Right are correct in general. But at the end of the day, good luck crapping on young men like this. We'll see how that works out for you. I won’t be joining you.

Nate Schlomann

47,845 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten