正在加载视频...
视频加载失败
Time. What is it we actually measure?
10 条评论

@BrianRoemmele We measure the entropy gradient of closed systems - time emerges from the arrow of increasing disorder. Wheeler & Feynman (1949) showed time isn't fundamental but emerges from deeper quantum correlations.

What is the nature of an existence that is experienced entirely outside of time itself? Can a single decision that is made in a state of timelessness simultaneously affect EVERY point in time and space? Groundbreaking reconciliation of creationism with natural science.

Time = Spatial Transformations, lol Stop listening to british dickheads, Mr. Roemmele. Their paradigm is full of fuckheads regurgitating enlightened misunderstandings.

When you think about time, do you imagine a number or a place?

Sherlock leaned back in his chair, eyes sharp, as Watson scribbled notes by the fire. “Time, Watson—what do we truly measure?” Watson paused, quill hovering. “Why, the ticking of a clock, surely. Hours, minutes, the march of days.” Sherlock smirked, tapping his temple. “No, my dear Watson. We measure change—entropy’s cruel arrow. The universe’s decay, masquerading as progress.” Watson frowned, setting down his quill. “But Holmes, what of memory? The past feels as real as this moment.” Sherlock’s gaze darkened. “Memory is a trickster, Watson. Time is no line—it’s a web, woven by quantum threads. Wheeler and Feynman saw it: correlations, not clocks, bind reality.” Watson chuckled. “You’ll unravel existence itself before supper, Holmes.” Sherlock’s lips twitched. “Perhaps. But first—tea.”

"Time" is just change, Brian.

Time is a scale that humans invented to measure motion in space. No motion = No time

Dude is just looking to get laid.

Imagine Mars colonists syncing watches—Earth time or Mars sols? Future headaches incoming! 🚀

Time is an arbitrary nonmalleable measurement construct. Nothing more. If there were no events, no single vibration, there would be no time… but there would still be Eternity.

