正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

To answer some questions: 3I/ATLAS would not be headed precisely for Jupiter (where it can "brake"), if it were planning to "pass through". By analogy, when a hunter tries to shoot a flying duck with a shotgun, he always aims slightly ahead of the target. Also there is no...

184,579 次观看 • 10 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🇺🇲🇺🇦🇷🇺 We talked about what weapons Ukraine needs — they desperately need "Patriots." They would like "Tomahawks." That's a step up... We discussed this with Zelensky," Trump said Other statements by the American president: ➡️ I have to give credit to Ukraine for holding up so well. They are great fighters. Very good fighters. ➡️ I think it would be in Putin's interest to settle this. And I believe he will settle it — we'll see. But if not, it won't be good for him. It won't be good, to be honest. ➡️ We had a very good conversation with Zelensky this morning and yesterday. As you know, we do not send any weapons directly — we send them to NATO, and NATO pays. ➡️ Biden gave Ukraine $350 billion, and we gave them, we gave them... nothing. But we gave them respect and some other things. ➡️ We talked about armaments — they need more, we are considering it. Hopefully, we can provide it. ➡️ You know, our country also needs weapons. We can't give away so many weapons that we have none left. ➡️ Will I send "Tomahawks"? We'll see. I don't know, I'll have to talk to Russia. Do they want "Tomahawks" flying their way? I don't think so. ➡️ I'll have to talk to Russia, I told Zelensky about this. Because "Tomahawks" are a new step of aggression. You understand this very well. I would say to Putin: look, if this war is not settled, I will provide them with "Tomahawks." ➡️ "Tomahawks" are incredible weapons, very offensive. And, honestly, Russia doesn't need this. They don't need it. If the war is not resolved, we can definitely do this. Maybe we won't, but maybe we will. I think it's appropriate. Yes. I want the war to be resolved. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

15,360 次观看 • 8 个月前

A Democrat Tennessee state rep. just openly called to abolish ICE on CNN. Scott Jennings let him hang himself with his own words. Scott Jennings asked Justin Pearson a series of questions — NONE of which he had an answer for. PEARSON: “This administration cannot be trusted and they can’t be trusted to hold themselves accountable.” “Even after the killing of Alex Pretti and Renee Good, they didn’t want to share information about what was happening, which is why we have to abolish ICE.” “We have to abolish the Customs and Border Patrol and the way they currently exist, and replace them with something that actually does the work that we need for them to, which is why we need a Congress—” JENNINGS: “Which work is that, by the way?” PEARSON: “I’ll tell you what the work is not, the work is not killing American citizens.” JENNINGS: “No. You said the work we need them to do. I’m interested in your opinion. What is work we need them to do?” PEARSON: “The work is not killing American citizens.” JENNINGS: “No. What is work we need them to do?” PEARSON: “Well, first let’s look at what they don’t need to do. They don’t need to go into communities like Memphis, Tennessee.” JENNINGS: “Do they need to deport illegal aliens? Do they need to deport illegal aliens?! Can you say it?” “Can you say it?” “Do we need a federal law enforcement agency to deport illegal aliens, yes or no?” PEARSON: “We do need a federal law enforcement agency that deals with immigration that doesn’t kill people.” JENNINGS: “Is there a single illegal alien that you would deport?” “Name one. Is there one?” “So the answer is no?” “Is the Democratic position for 26, that there are no illegal aliens that should be deported?”

Overton

224,199 次观看 • 4 个月前