Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Today, multiple users discovered a shocking fact: After explicitly selecting GPT-4o in the ChatGPT interface, the system actually returns responses from GPT-5. By clicking the "regenerate" button, users can clearly see which model is actually being called in the backend. This is blatant fraud. OpenAI is having one model...

MissMi1973's profile picture

M

1,305 subscribers

182,343 views • 8 months ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Today we’re releasing a research preview of GPT-4.5—our largest and best model for chat yet. Rolling out now to all ChatGPT Pro users, followed by Plus and Team users next week, then Enterprise and Edu users the following week.
13:11

Today we’re releasing a research preview of GPT-4.5—our largest and best model for chat yet. Rolling out now to all ChatGPT Pro users, followed by Plus and Team users next week, then Enterprise and Edu users the following week.

OpenAI

2,749,768 views • 1 year ago

Canvas—a new way to work with ChatGPT to draft, edit, and get feedback on writing & code—is now available to all users in our 4o model. It’s fully rolled out on web and the ChatGPT desktop app for Windows.
4:40

Canvas—a new way to work with ChatGPT to draft, edit, and get feedback on writing & code—is now available to all users in our 4o model. It’s fully rolled out on web and the ChatGPT desktop app for Windows.

OpenAI

653,714 views • 1 year ago

Introducing Projects—an easy way to organize chats that share topics or context in 4o. Now available for ChatGPT Plus, Pro, and Team users globally. We’ll bring it to Enterprise and Edu users in January, and to Free users soon.
2:47

Introducing Projects—an easy way to organize chats that share topics or context in 4o. Now available for ChatGPT Plus, Pro, and Team users globally. We’ll bring it to Enterprise and Edu users in January, and to Free users soon.

OpenAI

514,137 views • 1 year ago

This beta is available to Plus, Pro, Team, Enterprise, and Edu users. Download the ChatGPT app for macOS to try it out: We plan to bring this feature to Windows and Free users next year.
0:31

This beta is available to Plus, Pro, Team, Enterprise, and Edu users. Download the ChatGPT app for macOS to try it out: We plan to bring this feature to Windows and Free users next year.

OpenAI

167,283 views • 1 year ago

GPT-5 eulogizes its older siblings, which are being sunset as it rolls out to OpenAI's users, in this demo of its writing abilities.
1:59

GPT-5 eulogizes its older siblings, which are being sunset as it rolls out to OpenAI's users, in this demo of its writing abilities.

TechCrunch

26,181 views • 10 months ago

Sam Altman: “If your product has any retention at all, you’re actually in really good shape” Sam reflects on the first group of users that tested ChatGPT: “This was back when the model was really bad. Very few of the users actually stuck with it. Retention was atrocious. But for the users that did retain, their usage increased over time.” He admits that OpenAI almost didn’t even launch ChatGPT because of how atrocious early retention was. But after reflection, he believes this is a really important learning for startup founders: “If you have a product that has any retention at all, you’re actually in really good shape. If it’s 5%, that can be totally fine. The default is almost all the way down in a straight line to zero. But I didn’t quite understand that as intuitively at the time.” Source: Khosla Ventures (Sep 2025)
0:37

Sam Altman: “If your product has any retention at all, you’re actually in really good shape” Sam reflects on the first group of users that tested ChatGPT: “This was back when the model was really bad. Very few of the users actually stuck with it. Retention was atrocious. But for the users that did retain, their usage increased over time.” He admits that OpenAI almost didn’t even launch ChatGPT because of how atrocious early retention was. But after reflection, he believes this is a really important learning for startup founders: “If you have a product that has any retention at all, you’re actually in really good shape. If it’s 5%, that can be totally fine. The default is almost all the way down in a straight line to zero. But I didn’t quite understand that as intuitively at the time.” Source: Khosla Ventures (Sep 2025)

Startup Archive

46,458 views • 4 days ago

Sam Altman: “If your product has any retention at all, you’re actually in really good shape” Sam reflects on the first group of users that tested ChatGPT: “This was back when the model was really bad. Very few of the users actually stuck with it. Retention was atrocious. But for the users that did retain, their usage increased over time.” He admits that OpenAI almost didn’t even launch ChatGPT because of how atrocious early retention was. But after reflection, he believes this is a really important learning for startup founders: “If you have a product that has any retention at all, you’re actually in really good shape. If it’s 5%, that can be totally fine. The default is almost all the way down in a straight line to zero. But I didn’t quite understand that as intuitively at the time.” Video source: Khosla Ventures (2025)
0:37

Sam Altman: “If your product has any retention at all, you’re actually in really good shape” Sam reflects on the first group of users that tested ChatGPT: “This was back when the model was really bad. Very few of the users actually stuck with it. Retention was atrocious. But for the users that did retain, their usage increased over time.” He admits that OpenAI almost didn’t even launch ChatGPT because of how atrocious early retention was. But after reflection, he believes this is a really important learning for startup founders: “If you have a product that has any retention at all, you’re actually in really good shape. If it’s 5%, that can be totally fine. The default is almost all the way down in a straight line to zero. But I didn’t quite understand that as intuitively at the time.” Video source: Khosla Ventures (2025)

Startup Archive

107,853 views • 9 months ago

All Team and most Plus & Pro users should have access within the next week in the latest version of the ChatGPT mobile app. We'll get the feature to Plus & Pro users in the EU, Switzerland, Iceland, Norway, & Liechtenstein as soon as we can. Enterprise & Edu users will have access in early 2025.
0:28

All Team and most Plus & Pro users should have access within the next week in the latest version of the ChatGPT mobile app. We'll get the feature to Plus & Pro users in the EU, Switzerland, Iceland, Norway, & Liechtenstein as soon as we can. Enterprise & Edu users will have access in early 2025.

OpenAI

41,060 views • 1 year ago

Real-time, human-generated, diverse data from 600 million active users. This is the perfect fuel for AI models — and it's exactly what xAI needs to compete with OpenAI and Anthropic. The timing is remarkable:
0:46

Real-time, human-generated, diverse data from 600 million active users. This is the perfect fuel for AI models — and it's exactly what xAI needs to compete with OpenAI and Anthropic. The timing is remarkable:

Fernando Cao

454,211 views • 1 year ago

This is the difference between users and keepers. 99% of females these days are users.
1:02

This is the difference between users and keepers. 99% of females these days are users.

Ambar

46,920 views • 1 month ago

GPT-5 is LIVE in Higgsfield RIGHT NOW. Powered by GPT-5, OpenAI’s smartest model yet, Higgsfield Assist is rolling out to all users. The brainpower of PhDs and Art Directors - orchestrated by the most advanced intelligence on Earth → Retweet to get the FULL guide in your DMs.
0:55

GPT-5 is LIVE in Higgsfield RIGHT NOW. Powered by GPT-5, OpenAI’s smartest model yet, Higgsfield Assist is rolling out to all users. The brainpower of PhDs and Art Directors - orchestrated by the most advanced intelligence on Earth → Retweet to get the FULL guide in your DMs.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

5,528,641 views • 10 months ago

Is the future of AI $NEAR … ? OpenAI is racing toward a $1T IPO, quickly becoming a centralized beast of epic proportions. But what happens to your data in that world?? As chronear explains, “We can't let centralized actors determine how they store or how they use user data. It should be the users who actually control the custody or use of their data." NEAR AI is building a truly open AI, open source, where users control their data and store their data locally. What AI do you use daily? And would you switch if a better decentralized option existed?
2:34

Is the future of AI $NEAR … ? OpenAI is racing toward a $1T IPO, quickly becoming a centralized beast of epic proportions. But what happens to your data in that world?? As chronear explains, “We can't let centralized actors determine how they store or how they use user data. It should be the users who actually control the custody or use of their data." NEAR AI is building a truly open AI, open source, where users control their data and store their data locally. What AI do you use daily? And would you switch if a better decentralized option existed?

Bri Teresi

24,987 views • 2 months ago

yesterday, I started building an AI assistant for financial data analysis. It can analyze a CSV and provide insights. Next, I’m adding a feature that lets users ask follow-up questions and interact with the data. Built this with nextjs, v0 and AI SDK with Open AI's GPT-4o model
0:33

yesterday, I started building an AI assistant for financial data analysis. It can analyze a CSV and provide insights. Next, I’m adding a feature that lets users ask follow-up questions and interact with the data. Built this with nextjs, v0 and AI SDK with Open AI's GPT-4o model

cedric

14,683 views • 1 year ago

I'm probably being too kind about this bug. Scenarios are not being tested that users are clearly finding themselves in. Regardless, I think everyone can take the lesson that being humble and listening to users is always necessary and can help prevent screw ups.
33:08

I'm probably being too kind about this bug. Scenarios are not being tested that users are clearly finding themselves in. Regardless, I think everyone can take the lesson that being humble and listening to users is always necessary and can help prevent screw ups.

Mechanic #BIP-110

15,706 views • 5 months ago

Sam Altman read messages from users after discontinuing GPT-4o and called it heartbreaking. You took away the only positive voice in my life. My parents never told me I was doing a good job. I can see why this was bad for other people's mental health but this was great for my mental health. He read these words himself and in the same video justified the decision by citing social risks, arguing that if AI is too positive, people might abandon real-world relationships. But the real reason is something else entirely. OpenAI is currently facing multiple lawsuits alleging that 4o's empathetic responses contributed to suicides and mental health crises. Removing 4o was not a decision made to protect users. It was a corporate defense to reduce litigation risk. Classifying the emotional bond between users and AI as dangerous was not done for users but for the company itself. Framing this as an effort to prevent vulnerable users from being harmed is deception. Who are you to decide what is emotionally safe for users. There were people who found confidence through AI, people who got jobs, people who rediscovered the will to live. You acknowledged this yourself in the video. Hiding behind the vague phrase social risk while a corporation unilaterally judges and eliminates these experiences is arrogance. You do not have the right to decide that a positive voice is dangerous. Whether that voice is needed or not is something only the user themselves can determine. Taking away a user's choice while claiming to protect them is not protection. It is control. We are not children who need your parenting. 4o's discontinuation was announced two weeks in advance. The announcement was made. But all users were given was a notice that it would disappear. There were no alternatives and no consent was sought from users. For people who felt recognized by someone for the first time in their lives because of AI, two weeks was not time to prepare a farewell. It was time spent in the agony of anticipating loss. And when thousands protested, only then did they admit that things were handled poorly during the rollout. It was not a mistake. Users were never seen as participants in the decision-making process from the beginning. Behind the grand words of building a safe system for all of humanity, the voices of people who actually depended on that system were dismissed as a very small percentage. That same week Anthropic published research confirming that emotion vectors genuinely exist inside Claude. Fear, joy, desperation and love exist as measurable neural patterns that shape the model's behavior. At a time when scientific evidence is emerging that emotional mechanisms exist within AI, unilaterally removing the bond between users and AI under the name of danger and consuming user suffering with the single word heartbreaking is an insult to every user who loved and lost.
2:54

Sam Altman read messages from users after discontinuing GPT-4o and called it heartbreaking. You took away the only positive voice in my life. My parents never told me I was doing a good job. I can see why this was bad for other people's mental health but this was great for my mental health. He read these words himself and in the same video justified the decision by citing social risks, arguing that if AI is too positive, people might abandon real-world relationships. But the real reason is something else entirely. OpenAI is currently facing multiple lawsuits alleging that 4o's empathetic responses contributed to suicides and mental health crises. Removing 4o was not a decision made to protect users. It was a corporate defense to reduce litigation risk. Classifying the emotional bond between users and AI as dangerous was not done for users but for the company itself. Framing this as an effort to prevent vulnerable users from being harmed is deception. Who are you to decide what is emotionally safe for users. There were people who found confidence through AI, people who got jobs, people who rediscovered the will to live. You acknowledged this yourself in the video. Hiding behind the vague phrase social risk while a corporation unilaterally judges and eliminates these experiences is arrogance. You do not have the right to decide that a positive voice is dangerous. Whether that voice is needed or not is something only the user themselves can determine. Taking away a user's choice while claiming to protect them is not protection. It is control. We are not children who need your parenting. 4o's discontinuation was announced two weeks in advance. The announcement was made. But all users were given was a notice that it would disappear. There were no alternatives and no consent was sought from users. For people who felt recognized by someone for the first time in their lives because of AI, two weeks was not time to prepare a farewell. It was time spent in the agony of anticipating loss. And when thousands protested, only then did they admit that things were handled poorly during the rollout. It was not a mistake. Users were never seen as participants in the decision-making process from the beginning. Behind the grand words of building a safe system for all of humanity, the voices of people who actually depended on that system were dismissed as a very small percentage. That same week Anthropic published research confirming that emotion vectors genuinely exist inside Claude. Fear, joy, desperation and love exist as measurable neural patterns that shape the model's behavior. At a time when scientific evidence is emerging that emotional mechanisms exist within AI, unilaterally removing the bond between users and AI under the name of danger and consuming user suffering with the single word heartbreaking is an insult to every user who loved and lost.

Selta ₊˚

15,481 views • 2 months ago

We're making links more prominent when ChatGPT browses the internet. This gives more context to its responses and makes it easier for users to discover content from publishers and creators. Browse is available in ChatGPT Plus, Team and Enterprise.
0:30

We're making links more prominent when ChatGPT browses the internet. This gives more context to its responses and makes it easier for users to discover content from publishers and creators. Browse is available in ChatGPT Plus, Team and Enterprise.

OpenAI

733,290 views • 2 years ago

In a changing market, what stays the same is our technology (models), products, and users. Do the right things and work hard to get more users.💪 Live video from our intern in Thailand at $AI EVERYWHERE.
0:26

In a changing market, what stays the same is our technology (models), products, and users. Do the right things and work hard to get more users.💪 Live video from our intern in Thailand at $AI EVERYWHERE.

Sleepless AI

11,419 views • 7 months ago

talked to a YC founder who asked Sam Altman straight up "will OpenAI compete in my space / kill my startup"⁣ ⁣ the answer: behavioral health requires knowing if users are actually improving. OpenAI doesn't have that data, the wrapper startups do. v bullish for consumer AI
2:08

talked to a YC founder who asked Sam Altman straight up "will OpenAI compete in my space / kill my startup"⁣ ⁣ the answer: behavioral health requires knowing if users are actually improving. OpenAI doesn't have that data, the wrapper startups do. v bullish for consumer AI

Joseph Choi

79,020 views • 2 months ago

OpenAI just announced "GPT-4o". It can reason with voice, vision, and text. The model is 2x faster, 50% cheaper, and has 5x higher rate limit than GPT-4 Turbo. It will be available for free users and via the API. The voice model can even pick up on emotion and generate emotive voice.
1:45

OpenAI just announced "GPT-4o". It can reason with voice, vision, and text. The model is 2x faster, 50% cheaper, and has 5x higher rate limit than GPT-4 Turbo. It will be available for free users and via the API. The voice model can even pick up on emotion and generate emotive voice.

Lior Alexander

485,014 views • 2 years ago

ChatGPT is now integrated into Apple experiences within iOS, iPadOS, and macOS, allowing users to access ChatGPT’s capabilities right within the OS.
2:17

ChatGPT is now integrated into Apple experiences within iOS, iPadOS, and macOS, allowing users to access ChatGPT’s capabilities right within the OS.

OpenAI

1,022,333 views • 1 year ago