Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Today on Digital Foundry, we're looking at Switch 2's GameCube classics. Yes, latency is higher than original hardware - but how much higher? How does performance compare to original hardware? Lots to dig into with this one:

41,629 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

9 Yorum

Mogomra (e/acc) profil fotoğrafı
Mogomra (e/acc)1 yıl önce

Man, I wish more companies cared about latency It's better today than it was 5-10 years ago but the industry still isn't in a good spot IMO

dextoro profil fotoğrafı
dextoro1 yıl önce

Discover, Buy, and Sell Trending Solana Memecoins Gas-Free

Chris Freecss profil fotoğrafı
Chris Freecss1 yıl önce

As expected, Switch 2 is garbage...

Words are Tools of the Weak profil fotoğrafı
Words are Tools of the Weak1 yıl önce

They test latency for this, but don't do real input lag tests for Street Fighter 6, and go around saying (that the very laggy) SF6 on Switch 2 is "tournament-worthy?" What happened to Digital Foundry?

G profil fotoğrafı
G1 yıl önce

Nice! When BOTW and TOTK comparison video?!

les bleubleues 🇫🇷 profil fotoğrafı
les bleubleues 🇫🇷1 yıl önce

they need to give us twilight princess

Yadiel profil fotoğrafı
Yadiel1 yıl önce

Do a video using a Wii and Nintendont, it gives GameCube games the full power of the Wii instead of down clocking when you use a disc and games run like a dream

Jartan Media | Video Games profil fotoğrafı
Jartan Media | Video Games1 yıl önce

-Skyler Kitman's fav!

Cyclolio profil fotoğrafı
Cyclolio1 yıl önce

We can play gamecube games on Switch 2 ? How is it possible ? Is it possible to play wii games on switch 2 ?

Benzer Videolar

So many were so fixated on #Sony execs talking about emphasising MAU (monthly active users), they missed CEO Hiroki Totoki's explaining WHY MAU was important, and that's Average Revenue Per User (ARPU). "We expect to see stable growth in revenue and profits from network businesses due to the growth of monthly active users, corresponding to the further and steady expansion of the store base. Specifically, we will seek higher revenue and profits from PlayStation Plus and maximise ARPU, Average Revenue Per User of Playstation store." PlayStation's interested in MAU so far as it can increase ARPU, mainly through purchases from PSN or PS+. As I've said prior, ARPU matters most. Let's look at numbers comparing #Xbox and #Playstation financials, highlighting how. Latest quarterly results, both over the same period ending March 31st, 2025; Xbox Q3 (estimates) MAU - 500m Total revenue - $5.72bn Hardware revenue - $329m Revenue sans hardware - $5.39bn ARPU inc hardware - $11.44 ARPU sans hardware - $10.78 PlayStation Q4 (today's currency) MAU - 124m Total revenue - $7.23bn Hardware revenue - $1.26bn Revenue sans hardware - $5.97bn ARPU inc hardware - $58.31 ARPU sans hardware - $48.15 From the data, we can see that PlayStation's revenue is 26.4% higher than Xbox's, despite Xbox having 303% higher MAU. Even if you deduct all hardware revenue (though monthly active users buying accessories etc is still relevant), PlayStation's revenue's still 11% higher. But more interestingly, PlayStation's average revenue per user (ARPU) is a whopping 410% higher than Xbox's, and 347% higher if you remove all hardware revenue. PlayStation's ARPU is orders of magnitude higher, highlighting its significance and how MAU is important only so far as it can increase revenue, profitability and ARPU.

NIB

66,359 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce