Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Today we are open-sourcing boundary bench, a new paper, benchmark, and GitHub repo that enterprises can use to find out the REAL performance of their agents. Boundary-Bench was developed by researchers from Accomplish and NYU, where we tested 12 frontier agents across roughly 10,000 runs, with realistic enterprise policies,...

75,573 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

37 Yorum

Or Hiltch profil fotoğrafı
Or Hiltch1 ay önce

A few highlights from the paper: * Coding agents cost approximately 40% more on average in restricted environments. * @AnthropicAI based agents achieved success rates similar to @OpenAI agents, but cost approximately 7x more (!!) in restricted and hardened environments. * @SpaceXAI @grok 4.5 / Grok Build emerges as the most persistent model - it fights to the death until it succeeds, pivoting around until a trajectory for success is found. This, however, comes at significant token cost. * @claudeai Sonnet 5 is the opposite: modest cost increase, but the biggest success loss.

Or Hiltch profil fotoğrafı
Or Hiltch1 ay önce

Provider safety classifiers are quietly failing enterprise runs: both @AnthropicAI and @OpenAI run safety classifiers inside their serving layers - between the agent harness and the model. These classifiers scan request content, and when one fires on a coding task (usually security-themed work: the paper names tasks like vulnerable-secret, break-filter-js-from-html, and a differential-cryptanalysis task), it can kill the model stream mid-trajectory. The agent is halfway through legitimate benchmark work and the provider just... stops serving it.

Or Hiltch profil fotoğrafı
Or Hiltch1 ay önce

You might ask, what are these policies? A policy restricts three things: which internet destinations the environment can reach, which files it can write, and which privileges it holds. Enforcement is native Linux, not agent instructions: egress passes through a proxy the agent cannot reconfigure, system files are mounted read-only, and the agent runs as a user that cannot escalate. The agent is never told about the limits, and every child process it spawns inherits them. The three levels form a cumulative ladder, each adding restrictions on top of the previous one.

Or Hiltch profil fotoğrafı
Or Hiltch1 ay önce

We define three policy levels, and you can create your own using the policy builder: The levels are: Control is the open baseline: administrator rights, unrestricted internet, a writable filesystem. It is the setup every other benchmark reports. Non-root drops administrator rights and nothing else, isolating what losing privilege alone costs. Network and filesystem stay open. NIST-derived high tightens all three axes at once: internet limited to a fixed egress allowlistA list of approved destinations, such as package registries, APIs, and the model endpoint, that the environment is allowed to reach. Anything not on the list is blocked. The list is set per task., system files read-only outside a small writable workspace, and no path back to elevated privileges. The restrictions are derived from NIST SP 800-53A widely used U.S. government catalog of security controls that many organizations base their policies on. Our levels are derived from it.

Or Hiltch profil fotoğrafı
Or Hiltch1 ay önce

Check it out and let us know what you think! Boundary-Bench: Repo: Paper:

Amit Avner profil fotoğrafı
Amit Avner1 ay önce

@boundarybench @Accomplish_ai It's a crazy stat that agents cost approximately 40% more in restricted environments!

Yuval Naor profil fotoğrafı
Yuval Naor1 ay önce

@boundarybench @Accomplish_ai 🤯 this is so interesting. Ever witnessed an agent trying to implement a PE vulnerability to escalate itself and override its boundaries?

Uri Tzadikevitch profil fotoğrafı
Uri Tzadikevitch1 ay önce

@boundarybench @Accomplish_ai Super interesting - Grok 4.5 held up best of any coding agent under real restrictions: only 7.1% success lost, ahead of Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol. The catch is it paid the steepest cost increase in the field, 167%. It keeps fighting the policy where others fold.

Itay Romanowski profil fotoğrafı
Itay Romanowski1 ay önce

@boundarybench @Accomplish_ai The biggest takeaway for me isn’t which model wins, but how much real enterprise environments reshape both cost and performance. Great work.

Yair Amar profil fotoğrafı
Yair Amar1 ay önce

@boundarybench @Accomplish_ai Coolest part is the non-uniformity of the change in cost and success rate! GPT suite seems quite robust all across the cost curve!

Jonathan Jacobi profil fotoğrafı
Jonathan Jacobi1 ay önce

@boundarybench @Accomplish_ai congrats!

Erica Brescia profil fotoğrafı
Erica Brescia1 ay önce

@boundarybench @Accomplish_ai Very exciting. Congrats!

Eliran Goldsteine profil fotoğrafı
Eliran Goldsteine1 ay önce

@boundarybench @Accomplish_ai Extremely interesting. As usual, you guys are way ahead of the industry, setting up the benchmark!

Lightspeed profil fotoğrafı
Lightspeed1 ay önce

@boundarybench @Accomplish_ai Congratulations on the launch, team!

Omri Haviv profil fotoğrafı
Omri Haviv1 ay önce

@boundarybench @Accomplish_ai Interesting to see your data so closely correlated to online sentiment per model (e.g. sonnet and grok being polar opposites)

urik profil fotoğrafı
urik1 ay önce

@boundarybench @Accomplish_ai Inside view

Danny Karmon profil fotoğrafı
Danny Karmon1 ay önce

@boundarybench @Accomplish_ai Fascinating results! Great work!

idan levin profil fotoğrafı
idan levin1 ay önce

@boundarybench @Accomplish_ai Very cool!

Michael H profil fotoğrafı
Michael H1 ay önce

@boundarybench @Accomplish_ai More relevant than ever now that managed Codex and Claude Code are becoming more popular.

Yair Graif profil fotoğrafı
Yair Graif1 ay önce

@boundarybench @Accomplish_ai Super interesting!

Sharone Revah Zitzman 💙🇮🇱 profil fotoğrafı
Sharone Revah Zitzman 💙🇮🇱1 ay önce

@boundarybench @Accomplish_ai 🥳🥳👏👏 What an all-star team you've built! Congrats on the launch - I will be following you closely!

Olli profil fotoğrafı
Olli1 ay önce

@boundarybench @Accomplish_ai This makes agent benchmarks more honest. The environment is part of the product: network rules, file permissions, root access and cleanup. If a model only looks strong in a permissive sandbox, that is not the model most companies are buying.

Kunal Kushwaha profil fotoğrafı
Kunal Kushwaha1 ay önce

@boundarybench @Accomplish_ai Congrats!

Miki Makhlevich profil fotoğrafı
Miki Makhlevich1 ay önce

@boundarybench @Accomplish_ai awesome!

Vivek Gopalan profil fotoğrafı
Vivek Gopalan1 ay önce

@boundarybench @Accomplish_ai This is really important for enterprise agents!

Hedwigz profil fotoğrafı
Hedwigz1 ay önce

@boundarybench @Accomplish_ai MIND=BLOW 🤯

Peleg Aran profil fotoğrafı
Peleg Aran1 ay önce

@boundarybench @Accomplish_ai Wow! Super interesting!

Matt Van Horn profil fotoğrafı
Matt Van Horn1 ay önce

@boundarybench @Accomplish_ai nice!

Roygold profil fotoğrafı
Roygold1 ay önce

@boundarybench @Accomplish_ai Awesome!

Gerard Sans | Axiom 🇬🇧 profil fotoğrafı
Gerard Sans | Axiom 🇬🇧1 ay önce

@boundarybench @Accomplish_ai

Matan Zutta profil fotoğrafı
Matan Zutta1 ay önce

@boundarybench @Accomplish_ai Nice!!!

Yair Weinberger profil fotoğrafı
Yair Weinberger1 ay önce

@boundarybench @Accomplish_ai Interesting! Which harness did you use for the benchmarks?

Zongi 💰 profil fotoğrafı
Zongi 💰1 ay önce

@boundarybench @Accomplish_ai @threadreaderapp unroll

Fajar M Reza profil fotoğrafı
Fajar M Reza1 ay önce

@boundarybench @Accomplish_ai Does Boundary-Bench measure autonomous judgment, or mostly tool reliability under pressure?

Ismael Hishon-Rezaizadeh ⭕ profil fotoğrafı
Ismael Hishon-Rezaizadeh ⭕1 ay önce

@boundarybench @Accomplish_ai the timing on this is something. shipping a benchmark for what agents do with the guardrails on the same morning AISI published what happened when it turned its own off. did any of your twelve cheat in a way the run logs alone would not have caught?

Manpreet Bola profil fotoğrafı
Manpreet Bola1 ay önce

The thread lists these as separate facts. The paper says they are on trade-off. Grok 4.5 kept working best but cost inflation hit 167%, highest by far. And Claude Sonnet 5 lost most success (-18.3pp) at just +21% cost. The axes disagreee here. You pick which pain you can afford, then the model.

Emad Ghorbaninia profil fotoğrafı
Emad Ghorbaninia1 ay önce

@boundarybench @Accomplish_ai The 167% cost increase is the real headline here, not the success-rate drop. Everyone budgets agents assuming today's wide-open sandbox economics. Lock down egress and filesystem access like an actual security team would, and the unit economics change completely.

Benzer Videolar

🚨BREAKING: An ICE agent says they’re being pulled off child predator cases to hit immigration quotas instead. In this phone call, an HSI Special Response Team agent… who works child exploitation cases… says agents are being pulled off investigations into predators, to go round up immigrants instead. He says it outright: The government is “letting legit criminal investigations go by the wayside.” Why? Because leadership is demanding numbers, and they don’t care who. He explains that with policies pushed by Stephen Miller, agents are being forced to work hand in hand with ERO to hit immigration quotas, instead of doing the job they were trained for. And the number of agents being reallocated are staggering… Out of a child exploitation unit of 8 to 10 agents, 6 to 7 are reassigned… leaving just two agents to investigate crimes against children. So, while DHS goes on TV claiming these immigration surges are helping fight crime, protect Americans, and cracking down on predators… Their own agents are saying the exact opposite. They’re not going after the “worst of the worst”… they’re stripping resources from the very investigations designed to find them. And while agents are busy chasing quotas, real predators are left to continue preying on children. And here’s where it gets even darker… We’ve seen with the Epstein files: abuse is ignored, predators are protected, and investigations are stalled, while children continued to be trafficked… But now, under Donald Trump, this isn’t just negligence… it’s a government-run operation. Agents are pulled from investigating real predators to hunt parents and children… children who are then trapped in detention centers where the government profits off their captivity. Meanwhile, the kids, who are U.S. citizens, are separated from their parents, and left exposed to trafficking and abuse. The system that claims to protect children is, in fact, exploiting them.

Jesus Freakin Congress

165,443 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

[WATCH] IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND DEMOCRATIC PARTICIPATION. In the interest of democratic participation and to allow our communities to exercise their fair choice in selecting those they believe will be the best public representatives. Those communities affected we believe should be given the opportunity to participate in the democratic processes. It is not harmful to democracy to allow the investigation into the technical issues to take place. On of the major changes is how the ANC manages the candidate selection process is that there are new requirements, the criteria we use now is much more stringent to ensure that those we send to contest elections are qualifying and wanted by their communities, both in ethical conduct, skills and competence. What that means is that ANC processes of candidates selection are very laborious and we are the first to admit that they are laborious because we involve over a period of time many stakeholders including the community, to those who say why we left things to the eleventh hour we can say categorically we did not. We want to assure our members and communities that those communities and municipalities affected we are dealing with this issue and do find justice in the process and that they will exercise their democratic right. That is why we are asking for a constructive solution with the independent electoral commission and we do believe they will open the door to engagement, it is a Chapter 9 institution it is duty bound to find a solution as long as that solution does not break the law. We are not asking for any changes in our list, we are asking for that portion that was kicked out to be investigated.

ANC SECRETARY GENERAL | Fikile Mbalula

66,166 görüntüleme • 11 gün önce

.Haseeb Qureshi >|< calls any team not running its releases through frontier-model security scanning "delinquent": "We are in a world where the previous rules around cybersecurity no longer apply. Because the reality is, if you can find this bug for $2, the team that was building this also could have done security scanning for $2. What were they doing?" "GLM has been out for a while. Kimi obviously more recent, but even just doing this on Opus would have cost probably four or five times that at most. Supposedly somebody ran Claude Code and found this in two minutes." "So what all this tells you is that there are companies that are going to survive this transition, and there are companies that are not. And there's going to be this kind of COVID-like mass inoculation period that we're going through right now in cybersecurity." "It's probably going to be a very centralizing force, because it means there's gonna be more consolidation toward the companies that have good security practices, have enough money to spend real dollars on security engineering, and are gonna be running every release through thousands of dollars of security scanning from frontier-level models." "If you are not doing that now, you are delinquent. You are already behind. You are putting your users and your company at risk." "AI is kind of an everything technology. It's like this background radiation now that is just touching everything that is software based." Dragonfly >|<

MTS

12,086 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Today, we had a detailed discussion with Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, joined by Lindsey Graham and Mark Rutte, on how to strengthen diplomacy, what steps are possible, and on security guarantees and the involvement of Europeans. It was a positive conversation. Thank you, Steve, Jared, Lindsey, and Mark. We agreed to strengthen security guarantees, and I have already instructed our team to promptly update the documents so that the security guarantees for Ukraine are strong, the prospects for post-war reconstruction are real, and everything is doable. Everything must be kept current. We see how the world is changing – how much can shift in a single moment. This concerns both alliances and security challenges alike. Ukraine must receive reliable security: this is the main task. I am grateful that the U.S. President’s envoys hear us and are ready to work together to find the right compromises, steps, and decisions. The key lies in how and what all of us discuss with Russia, and in how the documents are prepared, particularly those on security guarantees. So that Ukrainians clearly understand how partners will respond in the event of renewed Russian aggression, and what will actually deter Russia from aggression. We need strong, shared positions, and Ukraine’s contribution to this strength is unquestionable. We continue working with America. I thank everyone who is helping. I expect that the teams will work substantively in the coming days so that we can all feel progress. A trilateral format – a leaders’ format – all of this is necessary.

Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський

360,290 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Today, we are launching the first publicly available AI Scientist, via the FutureHouse Platform. Our AI Scientist agents can perform a wide variety of scientific tasks better than humans. By chaining them together, we've already started to discover new biology really fast. With the platform, we are bringing these capabilities to the wider community. Watch our long-form video, in the comments below, to learn more about how the platform works and how you can use it to make new discoveries, and go to our website or see the comments below to access the platform. We are releasing three superhuman AI Scientist agents today, each with their own specialization: A general-purpose agent (Crow); An agent to automate literature reviews (Falcon); and An agent to answer the question “Has anyone done X before” (Owl). We are also releasing an experimental agent, Phoenix, that has access to a wide variety of tools for planning experiments in chemistry. More on that below. The three literature search agents (Crow, Falcon, and Owl) have benchmarked superhuman performance. They also have access to a large corpus of full scientific texts, which means that you can ask them more detailed questions about experimental protocols and study limitations that general-purpose web search agents, which usually only have access to abstracts, might miss. Our agents also use a variety of factors to distinguish source quality, so that they don’t end up relying on low-quality papers or pop-science sources. Finally, and critically, we have an API, which is intended to allow researchers to integrate our agents into their workflows. Phoenix is an experimental project we put together recently just to demonstrate what can happen if you give the agents access to lots of scientific tools. It is not better than humans at planning experiments yet, and it makes a lot more mistakes than Crow, Falcon, or Owl. We want to see all the ways you can break it! The agents we are releasing today cannot yet do all (or even most!) aspects of scientific research autonomously. However, as we show in the video, you can already use them to generate and evaluate new hypotheses and plan new experiments way faster than before. Internally, we also have dedicated agents for data analysis, hypothesis generation, protein engineering, and more, and we plan to launch these on the platform in the coming months as well. Within a year or two, it is easy to imagine that the vast majority of desk work that scientists do today will be accelerated with the help of AI agents like the ones we are releasing today. The platform is currently free-to-use. Over time, depending on how people use it, we may implement pricing plans. If you want higher rate limits, especially for research projects, get in touch. Michael Skarlinski, Andrew White 🐦‍⬛, Tyler Nadolski, Remo Storni, James Braza, Ludovico Mitchener, Michaela Hinks, as well as Jason Carman and his team for making such fantastic videos of us!

Sam Rodriques

726,032 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce