Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Tonight Sarah McInerney reports on proposed changes to surrogacy laws. Meet Egan family: Kathy is Luke's mother genetically but not legally, because he was born through surrogacy. Luke's Dad, Brian, is fighting cancer. They want the law changed. #rtept | RTÉ News | RTÉ One

69,347 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

A lady sent me this video. She was angry with what she heard. I checked the responses on IG, and women were not pleased. No wonder Ife didn't post this on X. I like to know what you think about the video. . . . I'll summarise their displeasure below. 1. Ethics. Just because you have money and audacity, does not make it ethical. Surrogacy exists as a means to help women going through fertility issues. It is not a way for rich women to shop for babies. There actually have to be a medical reason you are using surrogacy, to prevent abuse. To do otherwise could easily lead to exploitation and baby farming. 2. Economics of supply and demand. If surrogacy becomes something that only the rich can afford, the price would shoot up, and it would no longer be accessible to women who need it. Surrogacy is not a luxury item that the rich should buy just because... 3. She is 40 She intentionally skipped the part that she is 40 and geriatric. She is hiding the danger of her carrying pregnancy to term under "you dont owe anybody explanation. If you can afford it, do it. People hate that a woman can choose. They hate the audacity." This is a consolatory lie. Honesty is not that hard. The pregnancy is high risk, but she is desperately painting it as her choice. 4. Exploitation Women's womb should not be rented just because. It is a moral and ethical issue. The carrier need to feel she is helping out a family who cannot have kid of their own. It is a humanitarian issue, not business. If we agree that pregnancy itself can be life threatening if complications arise, then the least that should happen is that, it arose through empathy doing good for another woman, not something ticked off the market list of the bourgeoisie. . . . I'm just here to compare note. Do you agree it should be strictly business or regulated by ethics?

Sir Dickson

604,482 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🚨 Convicted Pedophile Teacher Legally BUYS a Baby in Pennsylvania — Because Surrogacy Has ZERO Sex-Offender Ban (But Adoption Does)​ PA’s Surrogacy Loophole: Where “Family Equality” Means a Registered Child Sex Offender Can Legally Buy a Baby — But Not Adopt One While Pennsylvania law explicitly prohibits Tier 1 registered sex offenders from adopting or fostering children — requiring background checks, home studies, and child-abuse clearances to uphold the “best interests of the child” doctrine — it is completely silent on commercial gestational surrogacy. No vetting. No safeguards. Just a pre-birth parentage order and a contract. Enter Brandon Keith Riley-Mitchell, publicly listed on Pennsylvania’s Megan’s Law registry. In 2016, as a Downingtown West High School chemistry teacher, he pleaded guilty to felony sexual abuse of a minor, possession of child pornography, corruption of minors, and endangering the welfare of children. He sent over 12,000 explicit text messages to a 16-year-old male student, soliciting nude images and more. He served jail time, completed probation, and remains a registered offender to this day. Yet in 2023, Riley-Mitchell and his husband Logan Riley (a second-grade teacher) launched a GoFundMe, crowdfunded thousands from unsuspecting donors, hired a family-friend surrogate, created embryos via IVF, and obtained full legal parental rights to a newborn boy — Atticus — without a single protective check. Their first-birthday videos went viral. The registry did too. This is not “progress.” It is the commodification of children: adult contractual rights triumphing over empirical child-welfare protections that every adoption statute in the state demands. Pennsylvania’s own lawmakers (Rep. Bernstine, Sen. Mastriano, and others) have introduced bills to close this exact gap — because the current framework treats a child like a private purchase order rather than a human life entitled to the state’s parens patriae duty. Child Protective Services must investigate immediately. The public registry is not optional. The loophole is not hypothetical. And the next “intended parent” with a similar record is already shopping. The law exists to protect the vulnerable from the powerful — not to launder predators through fertility clinics. Sign the petition. Demand the bills pass. Protect kids, not loopholes. #SurrogacyLoopholeExposed #CloseThePAChildSafetyGap #NoPredatorsParenting #ProtectChildrenFirst #EndTheSurrogacyScandal #MeganLawMatters #BestInterestsOfTheChild #PAFamilyLawFail

Tony Seruga

26,435 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce