Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Tony Robbins literally explained why the rich keep getting richer while everyone else stays stuck. It is not connections. It is not luck. It is a loop most people never realize they are in. He drew four boxes. Potential. Action. Results. Belief. They feed each other in a circle....

furiokao's profile picture

Furiokao

1,138 subscribers

167,308 просмотров • 25 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 15

Фото профиля Superior
Superior25 дней назад

that mindset shift is honestly the hardest part to master

Фото профиля Furiokao
Furiokao25 дней назад

market cycles always break your mindset anyway, regardless of what Tony says

Фото профиля Josh Jaouli
Josh Jaouli24 дней назад

@grok Please outline why Tony Robbins is full of shit here bc he has no understanding of basic economic concepts and there's a much simpler explanatory model: the rich are the beneficiaries of The Cantillon Effect.

Фото профиля Frezz
Frezz25 дней назад

Belief changes action. Action changes results. That loop changes everything.

Фото профиля Slide
Slide24 дней назад

Ask him about the contract he signed with the devil and what he had to do to receive his wealth and opportunities. Human trafficking, kids, etc

Фото профиля Monique Bouwer
Monique Bouwer25 дней назад

You can’t believe and know at the same time- it’s an either or situation 🤗

Фото профиля Aspirational Me
Aspirational Me24 дней назад

Identify what matters most to you and spend your time there. 1. Vision 2. Action 3. Progress 4. Reflection Aspirational Me provides the structure to help you.

Фото профиля King MJ
King MJ24 дней назад

Watched this entire video tons of times over the years. It’s so good!!

Фото профиля Pawan Lohia
Pawan Lohia25 дней назад

@grok youtube lino

Фото профиля HumanCode
HumanCode24 дней назад

The most dangerous part of the loop is that failure starts looking like evidence. You stop saying “this attempt failed” and start saying “I can’t do this.” Change the belief, change the action. Change the action, and eventually the evidence changes too.

Фото профиля Jane Smith
Jane Smith24 дней назад

Actually a lot of it is insider trading and crypto scams

Фото профиля King Hushed
King Hushed24 дней назад

Lol More like USAid and fraud

Фото профиля Saeculum Aureum
Saeculum Aureum22 дней назад

Frank Kern!

Фото профиля El Gringo
El Gringo25 дней назад

Interesting

Фото профиля Geopolitical Outpost
Geopolitical Outpost24 дней назад

@readwise save

Похожие видео

Tony Robbins literally explained why Robin Williams achieved everything a person could want and still hung himself. It is not money. It is not fame. It is not an Oscar. It is the one skill that has no formula. He said there are two skills in an extraordinary life. The first is the science of achievement. How to take what you envision and make it real. Most successful people master this one and stop. The second is the art of fulfillment. Making money is a science. Feeling rich is not. Fulfillment is different for every human being alive. You cannot model it from someone else. Williams wanted to make the whole world laugh. He did it. He wanted his own show. It was a hit. He wanted an Academy Award for drama not comedy. He won it. He achieved everything on the list and hung himself. Robbins said he made everyone happy except himself. That is the ultimate failure. Robbins gets calls from multi-billionaires asking for business help. Within ten minutes they admit the truth. They are miserable. They mastered the science and never started the art. He said wealth is not a skill. It is a decision. He lives part-time in Fiji where villagers with nothing are the happiest people he knows. A wealthy American spends years planning to finally be happy. The Fijian says sit on the beach right now. The full interview is free. It will outlast almost everything else in your feed today.
15:13

Tony Robbins literally explained why Robin Williams achieved everything a person could want and still hung himself. It is not money. It is not fame. It is not an Oscar. It is the one skill that has no formula. He said there are two skills in an extraordinary life. The first is the science of achievement. How to take what you envision and make it real. Most successful people master this one and stop. The second is the art of fulfillment. Making money is a science. Feeling rich is not. Fulfillment is different for every human being alive. You cannot model it from someone else. Williams wanted to make the whole world laugh. He did it. He wanted his own show. It was a hit. He wanted an Academy Award for drama not comedy. He won it. He achieved everything on the list and hung himself. Robbins said he made everyone happy except himself. That is the ultimate failure. Robbins gets calls from multi-billionaires asking for business help. Within ten minutes they admit the truth. They are miserable. They mastered the science and never started the art. He said wealth is not a skill. It is a decision. He lives part-time in Fiji where villagers with nothing are the happiest people he knows. A wealthy American spends years planning to finally be happy. The Fijian says sit on the beach right now. The full interview is free. It will outlast almost everything else in your feed today.

Furiokao

253,631 просмотров • 10 дней назад

Tony Robbins literally explained why the same person can make a fortune one year and lose it the next with the exact same brain. It is not the market. It is not the strategy. It is the state your body is in when you decide. He coached a trader named Paul Tudor Jones for 22 years. In 1987 the stock market had its worst single day crash in history. Jones made 200 percent while everyone around him was destroyed. Then he went cold. Same brain, same data, same models. He started losing money month after month and could not figure out why. Robbins flew in and watched him trade all day. Shoulders down, breathing shallow, slumped in his chair. He pulled up footage of Jones at his peak. Standing, moving, voice raised, commanding the room. Jones watched both tapes. He said those are two different people. Robbins told him the fix was not a new strategy. It was a new posture. He changed how Jones stood, breathed, and used his voice. The trades came back on their own. Robbins said the body decides first. Posture, breathing, voice. The mind follows. Change the body and the choice changes. Most people check their money slumped on a couch after a long day. This interview is sitting on the internet for free. Almost nobody changes how they sit before they open their banking app.
40:34

Tony Robbins literally explained why the same person can make a fortune one year and lose it the next with the exact same brain. It is not the market. It is not the strategy. It is the state your body is in when you decide. He coached a trader named Paul Tudor Jones for 22 years. In 1987 the stock market had its worst single day crash in history. Jones made 200 percent while everyone around him was destroyed. Then he went cold. Same brain, same data, same models. He started losing money month after month and could not figure out why. Robbins flew in and watched him trade all day. Shoulders down, breathing shallow, slumped in his chair. He pulled up footage of Jones at his peak. Standing, moving, voice raised, commanding the room. Jones watched both tapes. He said those are two different people. Robbins told him the fix was not a new strategy. It was a new posture. He changed how Jones stood, breathed, and used his voice. The trades came back on their own. Robbins said the body decides first. Posture, breathing, voice. The mind follows. Change the body and the choice changes. Most people check their money slumped on a couch after a long day. This interview is sitting on the internet for free. Almost nobody changes how they sit before they open their banking app.

Furiokao

43,956 просмотров • 15 дней назад

Tony Robbins literally explained why watching Bruce Springsteen perform made him want to quit at 23. It is not burnout. It is not failure. It is not doubt. It is the one comparison that poisons what you already built. He was running a seminar in Atlanta for 125 people. Three days at twelve hours each. He gave every person a flower and looked them in the eye to make sure each one transformed. A friend called and said Springsteen was four blocks away playing for 15,000. Christmas show. Clarence on stage. Tony finished his seminar and sprinted to the arena for the second encore. He got to the upper deck and watched the crowd lose their minds. Christmas songs then Born to Run. Three quarters through the song something broke inside him. He thought what I am doing does not matter. This man has 15,000 people screaming his name and I have 125 in a small room. He walked out while the arena was still shaking. He said you are never fair when you compare. You measure against a different path and a different timeline. The number you see tells you nothing about what is actually being built. Beating yourself up feels like drive but it lowers your energy. Lower energy means less output and less impact. The comparison meant to push you forward pulls you backward. This talk is free online. Most people will compare themselves to someone tonight instead of watching it.
32:56

Tony Robbins literally explained why watching Bruce Springsteen perform made him want to quit at 23. It is not burnout. It is not failure. It is not doubt. It is the one comparison that poisons what you already built. He was running a seminar in Atlanta for 125 people. Three days at twelve hours each. He gave every person a flower and looked them in the eye to make sure each one transformed. A friend called and said Springsteen was four blocks away playing for 15,000. Christmas show. Clarence on stage. Tony finished his seminar and sprinted to the arena for the second encore. He got to the upper deck and watched the crowd lose their minds. Christmas songs then Born to Run. Three quarters through the song something broke inside him. He thought what I am doing does not matter. This man has 15,000 people screaming his name and I have 125 in a small room. He walked out while the arena was still shaking. He said you are never fair when you compare. You measure against a different path and a different timeline. The number you see tells you nothing about what is actually being built. Beating yourself up feels like drive but it lowers your energy. Lower energy means less output and less impact. The comparison meant to push you forward pulls you backward. This talk is free online. Most people will compare themselves to someone tonight instead of watching it.

Furiokao

11,116 просмотров • 6 дней назад

One guy built a wedding camera app in a month and it now makes him over $1,000,000 a year. No team, no investors, no marketing budget. 100,000 downloads in the first month. Zero dollars on ads. He did not bolt marketing onto the product. He made using the product the marketing. You cannot use the app alone. The host has to pull every guest into it. One wedding is not one user. It is 200 people scanning the same code in one evening. The guest liked it at someone else's wedding. A month later he throws his own event and brings his own crowd. The loop spins for free. It does not look like an ad. To the guest it is a gift. So they install it gladly. $2 to $50 subscriptions. 5% pay. That is $100,000 a month. He did not win on budget. He sewed the growth into the product itself. Could you build the loop, or is it just luck?
0:23

One guy built a wedding camera app in a month and it now makes him over $1,000,000 a year. No team, no investors, no marketing budget. 100,000 downloads in the first month. Zero dollars on ads. He did not bolt marketing onto the product. He made using the product the marketing. You cannot use the app alone. The host has to pull every guest into it. One wedding is not one user. It is 200 people scanning the same code in one evening. The guest liked it at someone else's wedding. A month later he throws his own event and brings his own crowd. The loop spins for free. It does not look like an ad. To the guest it is a gift. So they install it gladly. $2 to $50 subscriptions. 5% pay. That is $100,000 a month. He did not win on budget. He sewed the growth into the product itself. Could you build the loop, or is it just luck?

Marlow

513,913 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Sam Altman said the smartest scientists in AI are the ones who held the entire field back. The experts were the problem. This is one of the most uncomfortable things he said all night. Altman said the field was honestly held back by a generation of scientists who were too certain about what scaling would not produce. The people with the most credibility were the most wrong. Then he explained why. It was not about intelligence. It was about identity. He said when you make your identity about a particular belief, that something will work or won't work, and then the data disproves you, you get stuck. You are too attached to the belief to let it go. You cannot see the truth anymore. The smarter you are, the more confidently you defend the wrong position. He pointed at the trolls who spent years saying scaling was a dead end, a fraud, a company destined to fail. The data kept proving them wrong. They kept repeating themselves anyway. He called that a form of insanity. Then he turned it around. He said it is a reminder in both directions. Including for the people who are currently right. The lesson is not that experts are dumb. It is that the moment a belief becomes who you are, it stops being something you can update. (Watch the full talk on YouTube at Stanford Online channel)
1:46

Sam Altman said the smartest scientists in AI are the ones who held the entire field back. The experts were the problem. This is one of the most uncomfortable things he said all night. Altman said the field was honestly held back by a generation of scientists who were too certain about what scaling would not produce. The people with the most credibility were the most wrong. Then he explained why. It was not about intelligence. It was about identity. He said when you make your identity about a particular belief, that something will work or won't work, and then the data disproves you, you get stuck. You are too attached to the belief to let it go. You cannot see the truth anymore. The smarter you are, the more confidently you defend the wrong position. He pointed at the trolls who spent years saying scaling was a dead end, a fraud, a company destined to fail. The data kept proving them wrong. They kept repeating themselves anyway. He called that a form of insanity. Then he turned it around. He said it is a reminder in both directions. Including for the people who are currently right. The lesson is not that experts are dumb. It is that the moment a belief becomes who you are, it stops being something you can update. (Watch the full talk on YouTube at Stanford Online channel)

Ihtesham Ali

698,786 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

This is not a conspiracy thread and it is not a rumor. It is an American imam saying the quiet part in a room with a microphone. He tells them change is coming to America. First a Muslim mayor. Then the school board. Then the township. Then the babies, because Pew already told him Muslim households have more children and those children become voters. He quotes the line that they are the best of nations and better than everybody else. He reminds them that people used to laugh when Muslims talked about taking Mecca, and then he asks where Mecca is now. That is the plan in his own words. Not a march with flags. A pipeline. Offices first, classrooms second, numbers third, and a generation later you wake up in a different country and wonder when the vote was held. They will call this bigotry the minute you repeat it. Play the video. He is not asking to live here. He is telling his people how to inherit it.
1:34

This is not a conspiracy thread and it is not a rumor. It is an American imam saying the quiet part in a room with a microphone. He tells them change is coming to America. First a Muslim mayor. Then the school board. Then the township. Then the babies, because Pew already told him Muslim households have more children and those children become voters. He quotes the line that they are the best of nations and better than everybody else. He reminds them that people used to laugh when Muslims talked about taking Mecca, and then he asks where Mecca is now. That is the plan in his own words. Not a march with flags. A pipeline. Offices first, classrooms second, numbers third, and a generation later you wake up in a different country and wonder when the vote was held. They will call this bigotry the minute you repeat it. Play the video. He is not asking to live here. He is telling his people how to inherit it.

Mor Edge Insight

11,973 просмотров • 17 дней назад

A pilot put a passenger jet down on a river and got every person on board off alive. Within days, investigators were asking him what he had eaten for lunch. He told them a tuna sandwich. Then they asked whether he had had a candy bar. Whether he had had a soda. That is not small talk. There is a precise reason those 2 questions could have ended his career, and Tom Hanks lays it out in about 4 sentences. The pilot is Chesley Sullenberger. Hanks played him, spent time with him first, and says the man walked him through the entire script telling him which parts never happened. As Hanks was told it, the stake was money. If the board could establish that the pilot did 1 thing wrong, the insurance on an airplane he puts at 17 million dollars would not have to be paid out. Every question in that room was built for that. It went on for the better part of a year. In the film it takes days, because films cannot afford a year. What was happening to him has a name in psychology. Baruch Fischhoff described it in 1975 and called it creeping determinism. Once you know how something ended, the ending looks like it was always coming, and every road you did not take looks like it was sitting right there, clearly marked, the whole time. Which is why the question "why did you not do this instead" is close to unanswerable. It is asked by people who know the ending, to a person who did not have it. There is a second effect underneath, well documented in aviation and in medicine. The person at the centre of the investigation frequently comes out of it in worse condition than the people he saved. Researchers gave that person a name. He is the second victim. Hanks is 67 when he says this, and what he admires is not the landing. It is a distinction he makes in 1 sentence near the end, and it is the whole reason he told the story at all. He saved everyone on that plane. Then he spent a year proving he had not eaten a candy bar.
12:36

A pilot put a passenger jet down on a river and got every person on board off alive. Within days, investigators were asking him what he had eaten for lunch. He told them a tuna sandwich. Then they asked whether he had had a candy bar. Whether he had had a soda. That is not small talk. There is a precise reason those 2 questions could have ended his career, and Tom Hanks lays it out in about 4 sentences. The pilot is Chesley Sullenberger. Hanks played him, spent time with him first, and says the man walked him through the entire script telling him which parts never happened. As Hanks was told it, the stake was money. If the board could establish that the pilot did 1 thing wrong, the insurance on an airplane he puts at 17 million dollars would not have to be paid out. Every question in that room was built for that. It went on for the better part of a year. In the film it takes days, because films cannot afford a year. What was happening to him has a name in psychology. Baruch Fischhoff described it in 1975 and called it creeping determinism. Once you know how something ended, the ending looks like it was always coming, and every road you did not take looks like it was sitting right there, clearly marked, the whole time. Which is why the question "why did you not do this instead" is close to unanswerable. It is asked by people who know the ending, to a person who did not have it. There is a second effect underneath, well documented in aviation and in medicine. The person at the centre of the investigation frequently comes out of it in worse condition than the people he saved. Researchers gave that person a name. He is the second victim. Hanks is 67 when he says this, and what he admires is not the landing. It is a distinction he makes in 1 sentence near the end, and it is the whole reason he told the story at all. He saved everyone on that plane. Then he spent a year proving he had not eaten a candy bar.

Stefan.

210,938 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Jim Rohn at 25 had a degree, a job, a wife and a family. He couldn't afford a $2 box of Girl Scout cookies. By the time he died in 2009, he had spoken to over 5 million people in 56 countries. Tony Robbins paid to sit in his seminars. So did Brian Tracy. His students went on to build hundreds of millions in personal wealth. He changed nothing about his circumstances. He changed one thing about himself. A wealthy man named Earl Shoaff asked to see his list of goals. Rohn had no list. He said if you don't have a list, I can already tell you the balance in your bank account is a few dollars. He was right. Shoaff gave him one sentence that started everything. Don't wish it were easier. Wish you were better. Rohn became a willing student overnight. Within a few years he was a millionaire. Then he spent the next 40 years explaining exactly how it works. To executives, to broke 25-year-olds, to anyone who would sit still long enough to listen. He said income doesn't change until the person changes. If you took all the money in the world and distributed it equally to everyone, it would soon all be back in the same pockets. He explained the law that governs every paycheck. You don't get paid for the time. It takes time to bring value to the market but you get paid for the value, not the time. So the only question that matters at work is not what will you earn. The question is what will you become. He explained the math no one teaches in school. Two people. Same age. Same school. Same company. Same city. Same traffic. Same problems. One makes $1,000 a month. The other makes $2,000. The list is identical. The money is double. Why. Not time. Not luck. Not connections. Value. You can't find more time. But you can become more valuable. He had a friend, Robert, who became a salesman when everyone told him he was insane. His brother mocked him publicly. Told him he'd lose everything. Robert said the way my brother treated me when I became a salesman made me so angry I decided to become rich. He became a millionaire. Rohn called it the formula. Find reasons and the answers come. Without reasons you are just hoping. And hope, he said, is a disease. The man who couldn't buy a $2 cookie went on to teach the most successful people in America how to think about money, time and personal growth. The seminar is free on YouTube. Filmed in 1981. Over two hours. Almost nobody has watched it as a complete explanation of why two people with identical lives end up in completely different places.
2:04:37

Jim Rohn at 25 had a degree, a job, a wife and a family. He couldn't afford a $2 box of Girl Scout cookies. By the time he died in 2009, he had spoken to over 5 million people in 56 countries. Tony Robbins paid to sit in his seminars. So did Brian Tracy. His students went on to build hundreds of millions in personal wealth. He changed nothing about his circumstances. He changed one thing about himself. A wealthy man named Earl Shoaff asked to see his list of goals. Rohn had no list. He said if you don't have a list, I can already tell you the balance in your bank account is a few dollars. He was right. Shoaff gave him one sentence that started everything. Don't wish it were easier. Wish you were better. Rohn became a willing student overnight. Within a few years he was a millionaire. Then he spent the next 40 years explaining exactly how it works. To executives, to broke 25-year-olds, to anyone who would sit still long enough to listen. He said income doesn't change until the person changes. If you took all the money in the world and distributed it equally to everyone, it would soon all be back in the same pockets. He explained the law that governs every paycheck. You don't get paid for the time. It takes time to bring value to the market but you get paid for the value, not the time. So the only question that matters at work is not what will you earn. The question is what will you become. He explained the math no one teaches in school. Two people. Same age. Same school. Same company. Same city. Same traffic. Same problems. One makes $1,000 a month. The other makes $2,000. The list is identical. The money is double. Why. Not time. Not luck. Not connections. Value. You can't find more time. But you can become more valuable. He had a friend, Robert, who became a salesman when everyone told him he was insane. His brother mocked him publicly. Told him he'd lose everything. Robert said the way my brother treated me when I became a salesman made me so angry I decided to become rich. He became a millionaire. Rohn called it the formula. Find reasons and the answers come. Without reasons you are just hoping. And hope, he said, is a disease. The man who couldn't buy a $2 cookie went on to teach the most successful people in America how to think about money, time and personal growth. The seminar is free on YouTube. Filmed in 1981. Over two hours. Almost nobody has watched it as a complete explanation of why two people with identical lives end up in completely different places.

Abyzon

12,195 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Tony Robbins charged $1 million per private consulting day in 2023. His seminars sell out at $10,000 per seat. Presidents and billionaires have flown him in on private jets to fix one conversation. In 1993 he was charging $5,000 per seminar seat and selling out arenas across America. By 2000 his company had generated over $400 million in revenue. By 2023 his net worth had crossed $600 million. He built all of it on one skill. Not strategy. Not marketing. Not timing. The ability to walk into any room of any size and move every person in it to action. In the early 1990s he sat down in a training room and explained exactly how he does it. The tape is free on YouTube. Almost nobody outside sales and speaking circles has finished it. He opened with one number that most people get completely backwards. 80% of being effective in front of any room is why you are there. 20% is how. Most people spend 100% of their preparation on the how. The words. The slides. The structure. The order. He said that is exactly why most people are forgettable the moment they stop talking. He said when he walks into a room he has zero internal dialogue. None. He is entirely focused outward on the people in front of him. The moment he starts talking to himself inside his head about whether it is going well — it stops going well. Every time. He ran the most effective direct response television show in the United States at the time. Outselling every competitor by three times. Not because of better production. Because of one framework he used in every single episode. First 40% of any presentation — get people to say me too. Not so what. Me too. You are not there to impress them. You are there to make them feel understood. Until that happens nothing else works. Next 10% — logic and reason. Just enough to let people justify the decision they have already emotionally made. Not more. Most speakers spend 80% of their time here and wonder why nothing lands. Next 40% — attack and confess. Say out loud every reason someone would not do what you are asking. Before they think of it themselves. Confess that you have been guilty of it too. The moment you name their resistance before they do you become the only person in the room they fully trust. Last 10% — solution and ask. By this point the ask is a formality. He said persuasion is a transference of emotion. You cannot transfer what you are not experiencing. If you are not genuinely moved by what you are saying the room will not be moved either. No technique fixes that gap. He also said something most people in that room heard as a throwaway line and almost nobody acted on. When two human beings meet the one who is most congruent will control the situation. Every time. Without exception. The tape runs just over an hour. Free on YouTube since the early 1990s. Almost nobody outside professional speakers has watched it as a complete system.
1:08:31

Tony Robbins charged $1 million per private consulting day in 2023. His seminars sell out at $10,000 per seat. Presidents and billionaires have flown him in on private jets to fix one conversation. In 1993 he was charging $5,000 per seminar seat and selling out arenas across America. By 2000 his company had generated over $400 million in revenue. By 2023 his net worth had crossed $600 million. He built all of it on one skill. Not strategy. Not marketing. Not timing. The ability to walk into any room of any size and move every person in it to action. In the early 1990s he sat down in a training room and explained exactly how he does it. The tape is free on YouTube. Almost nobody outside sales and speaking circles has finished it. He opened with one number that most people get completely backwards. 80% of being effective in front of any room is why you are there. 20% is how. Most people spend 100% of their preparation on the how. The words. The slides. The structure. The order. He said that is exactly why most people are forgettable the moment they stop talking. He said when he walks into a room he has zero internal dialogue. None. He is entirely focused outward on the people in front of him. The moment he starts talking to himself inside his head about whether it is going well — it stops going well. Every time. He ran the most effective direct response television show in the United States at the time. Outselling every competitor by three times. Not because of better production. Because of one framework he used in every single episode. First 40% of any presentation — get people to say me too. Not so what. Me too. You are not there to impress them. You are there to make them feel understood. Until that happens nothing else works. Next 10% — logic and reason. Just enough to let people justify the decision they have already emotionally made. Not more. Most speakers spend 80% of their time here and wonder why nothing lands. Next 40% — attack and confess. Say out loud every reason someone would not do what you are asking. Before they think of it themselves. Confess that you have been guilty of it too. The moment you name their resistance before they do you become the only person in the room they fully trust. Last 10% — solution and ask. By this point the ask is a formality. He said persuasion is a transference of emotion. You cannot transfer what you are not experiencing. If you are not genuinely moved by what you are saying the room will not be moved either. No technique fixes that gap. He also said something most people in that room heard as a throwaway line and almost nobody acted on. When two human beings meet the one who is most congruent will control the situation. Every time. Without exception. The tape runs just over an hour. Free on YouTube since the early 1990s. Almost nobody outside professional speakers has watched it as a complete system.

Abyzon

128,358 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

He is not just a liar. He is the MOST DANGEROUS KIND. A CALCULATED liar who told you EXACTLY what he was going to do to you. Who described the damage austerity does to the most vulnerable. Who proved he understood every word of it. Then looked you in the eye. And did it anyway. While STILL DENYING IT. That is not incompetence. That is not a broken promise. That is PREMEDITATED. That is who he is. His cuts to the welfare bill are FOUR TIMES greater than anything the Conservatives proposed. The Health Foundation confirmed it. Four times. The very austerity he called devastating and promised never to repeat. The average family will be £1,400 worse off by 2030. While his biggest donor Lord Alli was given UNRESTRICTED ACCESS to Downing Street. Hosted a party there for other Labour donors. The same Lord Alli whose name appears in the Epstein files. Cutting the most vulnerable people in Britain to the bone. While his donors party in Downing Street. That is not austerity. That is theft. Dressed up in a suit. Delivered with a straight face.
0:28

He is not just a liar. He is the MOST DANGEROUS KIND. A CALCULATED liar who told you EXACTLY what he was going to do to you. Who described the damage austerity does to the most vulnerable. Who proved he understood every word of it. Then looked you in the eye. And did it anyway. While STILL DENYING IT. That is not incompetence. That is not a broken promise. That is PREMEDITATED. That is who he is. His cuts to the welfare bill are FOUR TIMES greater than anything the Conservatives proposed. The Health Foundation confirmed it. Four times. The very austerity he called devastating and promised never to repeat. The average family will be £1,400 worse off by 2030. While his biggest donor Lord Alli was given UNRESTRICTED ACCESS to Downing Street. Hosted a party there for other Labour donors. The same Lord Alli whose name appears in the Epstein files. Cutting the most vulnerable people in Britain to the bone. While his donors party in Downing Street. That is not austerity. That is theft. Dressed up in a suit. Delivered with a straight face.

BanksyCat

87,806 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

In 1993 he was charging $5,000 per seminar seat and selling out arenas across America. By 2000 his company Robbins Research International had generated over $400 million in revenue. By 2023 his net worth had crossed $600 million and he was charging $1 million per private consulting day. Presidents and billionaires flew him in on private jets to fix one conversation. He built all of it on one skill. His name is Tony Robbins. And in the early 1990s he sat down in a training room and explained exactly how he does it. He opened with a number that most people in that room got completely backwards. 80% of being effective in front of any room is why you are there. 20% is how. Most speakers spend 100% of their preparation on the how. The words. The slides. The structure. The order. He said that is exactly why most people are forgettable the moment they stop talking. He said when he walks into a room he has zero internal dialogue. None. He is entirely focused outward on the people in front of him. The moment he starts talking to himself inside his head about whether it is going well — it stops going well. Every time. He ran the most effective direct response television show in the United States at the time. Outselling every competitor by three times. Not because of better production. Because of one framework he used in every single episode. First 40% of any presentation — get people to say me too. Not so what. Me too. You are not there to impress them. You are there to make them feel understood. Until that happens nothing else works. Next 10% — logic and reason. Just enough to let people justify the decision they have already emotionally made. Not more. Most speakers spend 80% of their time here and wonder why nothing lands. Next 40% — attack and confess. Say out loud every reason someone would not do what you are asking. Confess that you have been guilty of it too. The moment you name their resistance before they do you become the only person in the room they fully trust. Last 10% — solution and ask. By this point the ask is a formality. He said persuasion is a transference of emotion. You cannot transfer what you are not experiencing. If you are not genuinely moved by what you are saying the room will not be moved either. No technique fixes that gap. He also said something most people in that room heard as a throwaway line and almost nobody acted on. When two human beings meet the one who is most congruent will control the situation. Every time. Without exception. The tape runs just over an hour. Free on YouTube since the early 1990s. Almost nobody outside of professional speakers has watched it as a complete system.
1:08:32

In 1993 he was charging $5,000 per seminar seat and selling out arenas across America. By 2000 his company Robbins Research International had generated over $400 million in revenue. By 2023 his net worth had crossed $600 million and he was charging $1 million per private consulting day. Presidents and billionaires flew him in on private jets to fix one conversation. He built all of it on one skill. His name is Tony Robbins. And in the early 1990s he sat down in a training room and explained exactly how he does it. He opened with a number that most people in that room got completely backwards. 80% of being effective in front of any room is why you are there. 20% is how. Most speakers spend 100% of their preparation on the how. The words. The slides. The structure. The order. He said that is exactly why most people are forgettable the moment they stop talking. He said when he walks into a room he has zero internal dialogue. None. He is entirely focused outward on the people in front of him. The moment he starts talking to himself inside his head about whether it is going well — it stops going well. Every time. He ran the most effective direct response television show in the United States at the time. Outselling every competitor by three times. Not because of better production. Because of one framework he used in every single episode. First 40% of any presentation — get people to say me too. Not so what. Me too. You are not there to impress them. You are there to make them feel understood. Until that happens nothing else works. Next 10% — logic and reason. Just enough to let people justify the decision they have already emotionally made. Not more. Most speakers spend 80% of their time here and wonder why nothing lands. Next 40% — attack and confess. Say out loud every reason someone would not do what you are asking. Confess that you have been guilty of it too. The moment you name their resistance before they do you become the only person in the room they fully trust. Last 10% — solution and ask. By this point the ask is a formality. He said persuasion is a transference of emotion. You cannot transfer what you are not experiencing. If you are not genuinely moved by what you are saying the room will not be moved either. No technique fixes that gap. He also said something most people in that room heard as a throwaway line and almost nobody acted on. When two human beings meet the one who is most congruent will control the situation. Every time. Without exception. The tape runs just over an hour. Free on YouTube since the early 1990s. Almost nobody outside of professional speakers has watched it as a complete system.

Potato

63,999 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

i genuinely don't understand why this isn't shown to anyone who has ever said the words "they should just." a nobel laureate sat on live television in 1977 and explained why nobody alive knows enough to fix anything. his name is friedrich hayek. he took the nobel prize in economics three years before this. he wrote the road to serfdom in the middle of the second world war and it has never once been out of print. he was seventy eight when he agreed to do this live, in front of a panel, with one camera and no edit. he gets one question in the first minute. the answer he gives is not a policy, and it is not a number. he is sitting in 1977 describing something that arrives five years later, and he does it without a single hedge. there is one sentence about prices that the whole hour rests on. it takes him about nine seconds and i went back and played it thrice. then he says something about unemployment figures that i don't think any economist would put his name to on camera today. watch buckley's face rather than his. fifty seven minutes, one camera, no edits, no breaks. it went out once in 1977 and i cannot work out why almost nobody has sat through it since.
57:31

i genuinely don't understand why this isn't shown to anyone who has ever said the words "they should just." a nobel laureate sat on live television in 1977 and explained why nobody alive knows enough to fix anything. his name is friedrich hayek. he took the nobel prize in economics three years before this. he wrote the road to serfdom in the middle of the second world war and it has never once been out of print. he was seventy eight when he agreed to do this live, in front of a panel, with one camera and no edit. he gets one question in the first minute. the answer he gives is not a policy, and it is not a number. he is sitting in 1977 describing something that arrives five years later, and he does it without a single hedge. there is one sentence about prices that the whole hour rests on. it takes him about nine seconds and i went back and played it thrice. then he says something about unemployment figures that i don't think any economist would put his name to on camera today. watch buckley's face rather than his. fifty seven minutes, one camera, no edits, no breaks. it went out once in 1977 and i cannot work out why almost nobody has sat through it since.

Zyron

59,574 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

The CEO of OpenAI was asked for his hottest take. His answer wasn't a prediction about a product. It was that the whole world is sleeping through the most important thing happening to it. A student asked Altman for his spiciest take. He paused. He admitted he could probably find a spicier one with more time. Then he landed somewhere quiet. AI is just going to keep going. That sounds obvious until you hear how he framed it. He said this is not widely believed yet. And if it were actually believed, there would be far more reverberations through society right now than there are. That is the whole point. He is not saying people doubt AI is useful. He is saying people have not internalized what continuing on this curve actually means. They nod along and then go back to their day. Then he gave the timeframe. It has been three and a half years since ChatGPT. He said if you run another three and a half years on the same trajectory, what society is capable of is completely different. Not improved. Different. The scariest takes are usually loud. This one was Altman calmly saying the biggest change in human history is already underway, and almost nobody is acting like it. (Watch the full talk on YouTube at Stanford Online channel)
0:49

The CEO of OpenAI was asked for his hottest take. His answer wasn't a prediction about a product. It was that the whole world is sleeping through the most important thing happening to it. A student asked Altman for his spiciest take. He paused. He admitted he could probably find a spicier one with more time. Then he landed somewhere quiet. AI is just going to keep going. That sounds obvious until you hear how he framed it. He said this is not widely believed yet. And if it were actually believed, there would be far more reverberations through society right now than there are. That is the whole point. He is not saying people doubt AI is useful. He is saying people have not internalized what continuing on this curve actually means. They nod along and then go back to their day. Then he gave the timeframe. It has been three and a half years since ChatGPT. He said if you run another three and a half years on the same trajectory, what society is capable of is completely different. Not improved. Different. The scariest takes are usually loud. This one was Altman calmly saying the biggest change in human history is already underway, and almost nobody is acting like it. (Watch the full talk on YouTube at Stanford Online channel)

Ihtesham Ali

15,821 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Elon Musk was asked what happens to people when the machines no longer need them. He didn’t soften it. Musk: “There will be fewer and fewer jobs that a robot cannot do better. These are not things I wish would happen. They probably will.” Sit with that second sentence. He is not celebrating. He is not selling a vision. He is telling you what he believes is inevitable and admitting he wishes it weren’t. That is not optimism. That is a confession. Most people are still arguing over whether this is real. Whether it’s their job or someone else’s. Whether the timeline is years away or decades. Musk isn’t arguing. He resolved it. And it bothers him. Musk: “I think ultimately we will have to have some kind of universal basic income. I don’t think we’re going to have a choice.” Not a political position. Not a utopian proposal. A concession. We are building something so capable that human labor stops being a required input to the economy. The machine does not need rest. It does not need a salary. It does not call in sick. It does not ask for a raise. And it improves every single month. The jobs that feel safe right now are not safe because they are irreplaceable. They feel safe because the technology hasn’t fully arrived yet. It’s arriving. Musk: “How do people then have meaning? If there’s not a need for your labor, what’s the meaning? Do you feel useless?” He said that is the harder problem. Not the economics. Not the policy. Not how you fund UBI or make it hold. The harder problem is what happens to a person who built their entire identity around being needed. That is most people. You were trained from childhood to believe your value is what you produce. That your worth is what you earn. That rest is something you survive the week to reach, not something you deserve simply by existing. When the machine removes the need for your labor, that belief does not update. It breaks. The people least prepared for that moment are the ones who worked the hardest. The ones who took the most pride in being indispensable. The ones who made work the whole answer. Losing the job is survivable. Losing the reason to get up is not. That is what Musk is actually asking. Not how do we pay people. How do we build a world where people still feel like they matter when the economy no longer needs them. Nobody in power is seriously working on that answer. The machine didn’t wait.
1:16

Elon Musk was asked what happens to people when the machines no longer need them. He didn’t soften it. Musk: “There will be fewer and fewer jobs that a robot cannot do better. These are not things I wish would happen. They probably will.” Sit with that second sentence. He is not celebrating. He is not selling a vision. He is telling you what he believes is inevitable and admitting he wishes it weren’t. That is not optimism. That is a confession. Most people are still arguing over whether this is real. Whether it’s their job or someone else’s. Whether the timeline is years away or decades. Musk isn’t arguing. He resolved it. And it bothers him. Musk: “I think ultimately we will have to have some kind of universal basic income. I don’t think we’re going to have a choice.” Not a political position. Not a utopian proposal. A concession. We are building something so capable that human labor stops being a required input to the economy. The machine does not need rest. It does not need a salary. It does not call in sick. It does not ask for a raise. And it improves every single month. The jobs that feel safe right now are not safe because they are irreplaceable. They feel safe because the technology hasn’t fully arrived yet. It’s arriving. Musk: “How do people then have meaning? If there’s not a need for your labor, what’s the meaning? Do you feel useless?” He said that is the harder problem. Not the economics. Not the policy. Not how you fund UBI or make it hold. The harder problem is what happens to a person who built their entire identity around being needed. That is most people. You were trained from childhood to believe your value is what you produce. That your worth is what you earn. That rest is something you survive the week to reach, not something you deserve simply by existing. When the machine removes the need for your labor, that belief does not update. It breaks. The people least prepared for that moment are the ones who worked the hardest. The ones who took the most pride in being indispensable. The ones who made work the whole answer. Losing the job is survivable. Losing the reason to get up is not. That is what Musk is actually asking. Not how do we pay people. How do we build a world where people still feel like they matter when the economy no longer needs them. Nobody in power is seriously working on that answer. The machine didn’t wait.

Dustin

247,233 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Lex Fridman asked Jensen Huang if he is afraid of death. Huang did not flinch. Huang: “The outcome that I seek, that I hope for, is that I die on the job instantaneously.” That is not a figure of speech. That is a man telling you he has already decided how this ends. No retirement. No transition plan. No golden years on a beach somewhere tallying what he built. He wants to be mid-sentence in a meeting the moment his heart gives out. And when you understand why, it changes how you see everything Nvidia is doing. Huang: “This is not a once in a lifetime experience. This is a once in a humanity experience.” Once in a lifetime means others have lived through something comparable. He is saying no one has. Not Edison. Not Ford. Not anyone at Bell Labs or Xerox PARC. The deployment of artificial intelligence at this scale, at this speed, with this much consequence has no precedent in the history of the species. And Huang is sitting at the center of it. That is not ego. That is geography. Nvidia’s chips power virtually every major AI system on Earth right now. He knows what that means. And he treats it with a seriousness most people cannot even summon for their own lives, let alone the trajectory of civilization. Then Lex asked about succession planning. Huang’s answer should be framed on the wall of every founder alive. Huang: “I don’t believe in succession planning.” Not because he thinks he is immortal. Because he thinks it is the wrong question entirely. The right question is what are you doing today to make yourself unnecessary. Huang: “The most important thing you should do today is to pass on knowledge, information, insight, skills, experience as often and continuously as you can.” He does not wait until retirement to hand over what he knows. He does not save his best thinking for a memoir. The second he learns something, it is already moving to someone else on his team. Before he has even finished processing it himself. Huang: “Nothing I learn ever sits on my desk longer than a fraction of a second.” Most executives hoard knowledge. It is how they stay relevant. How they justify the title. How they make themselves impossible to replace. Huang does the opposite. He treats his own mind like a relay station. Information comes in, gets amplified, fires out to every node that needs it. Every meeting is a transfer. Every conversation is a download. The goal is not to be the smartest person in the building. The goal is to make the building smarter than any one person in it. That is why he does not need a succession plan. If you spend every day making the people around you capable of running without you, the org never notices the moment you are gone. Your fingerprints are in how they think. But he is not planning to leave. Huang: “I really don’t want to die. I have a great life. I have a great family. I have really important work.” No drama. No existential spiral. Just a man who looked at death and filed it under problems that can wait. There is still too much to build. The people planning their exit strategies are playing a different game than Jensen Huang. He is not building a company he can walk away from. He is building one that outlasts his heartbeat because every person inside it already thinks in patterns he installed. That is not a death wish. That is a man who found the only thing worth doing and refused to do anything else.
2:34

Lex Fridman asked Jensen Huang if he is afraid of death. Huang did not flinch. Huang: “The outcome that I seek, that I hope for, is that I die on the job instantaneously.” That is not a figure of speech. That is a man telling you he has already decided how this ends. No retirement. No transition plan. No golden years on a beach somewhere tallying what he built. He wants to be mid-sentence in a meeting the moment his heart gives out. And when you understand why, it changes how you see everything Nvidia is doing. Huang: “This is not a once in a lifetime experience. This is a once in a humanity experience.” Once in a lifetime means others have lived through something comparable. He is saying no one has. Not Edison. Not Ford. Not anyone at Bell Labs or Xerox PARC. The deployment of artificial intelligence at this scale, at this speed, with this much consequence has no precedent in the history of the species. And Huang is sitting at the center of it. That is not ego. That is geography. Nvidia’s chips power virtually every major AI system on Earth right now. He knows what that means. And he treats it with a seriousness most people cannot even summon for their own lives, let alone the trajectory of civilization. Then Lex asked about succession planning. Huang’s answer should be framed on the wall of every founder alive. Huang: “I don’t believe in succession planning.” Not because he thinks he is immortal. Because he thinks it is the wrong question entirely. The right question is what are you doing today to make yourself unnecessary. Huang: “The most important thing you should do today is to pass on knowledge, information, insight, skills, experience as often and continuously as you can.” He does not wait until retirement to hand over what he knows. He does not save his best thinking for a memoir. The second he learns something, it is already moving to someone else on his team. Before he has even finished processing it himself. Huang: “Nothing I learn ever sits on my desk longer than a fraction of a second.” Most executives hoard knowledge. It is how they stay relevant. How they justify the title. How they make themselves impossible to replace. Huang does the opposite. He treats his own mind like a relay station. Information comes in, gets amplified, fires out to every node that needs it. Every meeting is a transfer. Every conversation is a download. The goal is not to be the smartest person in the building. The goal is to make the building smarter than any one person in it. That is why he does not need a succession plan. If you spend every day making the people around you capable of running without you, the org never notices the moment you are gone. Your fingerprints are in how they think. But he is not planning to leave. Huang: “I really don’t want to die. I have a great life. I have a great family. I have really important work.” No drama. No existential spiral. Just a man who looked at death and filed it under problems that can wait. There is still too much to build. The people planning their exit strategies are playing a different game than Jensen Huang. He is not building a company he can walk away from. He is building one that outlasts his heartbeat because every person inside it already thinks in patterns he installed. That is not a death wish. That is a man who found the only thing worth doing and refused to do anything else.

Dustin

25,617 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Zuckerberg dropped out and still says the useful part of college was not the classes. He met Priscilla there. He met people who are still in his life. The lectures were fine, he says. Entertaining. The point was leaving home and learning how to be around other adults. He had already done two years of boarding school, then two years of college, and left. Then the part that is not nostalgia. College is expensive. You finish in debt. You are not guaranteed a job. If it is not preparing you for the work, you start in a hole. Saying not everyone needs the degree used to be taboo. He thinks that taboo is thinner than it was ten years ago.
2:44

Zuckerberg dropped out and still says the useful part of college was not the classes. He met Priscilla there. He met people who are still in his life. The lectures were fine, he says. Entertaining. The point was leaving home and learning how to be around other adults. He had already done two years of boarding school, then two years of college, and left. Then the part that is not nostalgia. College is expensive. You finish in debt. You are not guaranteed a job. If it is not preparing you for the work, you start in a hole. Saying not everyone needs the degree used to be taboo. He thinks that taboo is thinner than it was ten years ago.

vladuah

49,979 просмотров • 7 дней назад

Lots of folks wondering why the two plays to Oneil Cruz in the Pittsburgh Pirates at New York Mets game were recorded as hits. Here is the first one, and you can see he misjudges this line drive, and he comes in and then it sails over his head. MIsjudgement is NOT an error, so this correctly went down as a triple. Is it a ball that he needs to catch? Yes. Is it an error? No. An error is a physical misplay, and there is not a physicial misplay here. #LetsGoBucs #LGM
1:06

Lots of folks wondering why the two plays to Oneil Cruz in the Pittsburgh Pirates at New York Mets game were recorded as hits. Here is the first one, and you can see he misjudges this line drive, and he comes in and then it sails over his head. MIsjudgement is NOT an error, so this correctly went down as a triple. Is it a ball that he needs to catch? Yes. Is it an error? No. An error is a physical misplay, and there is not a physicial misplay here. #LetsGoBucs #LGM

MLB Scoring Changes

118,748 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨 In 1995, a 45-minute talk quietly revealed why most people stay stuck and how a few become unstoppable. Most people have never really understood it. It came from Brian Tracy and instead of hype, he broke down the psychology behind achievement. The ideas hit differently. He explained why humans keep going down the same empty tunnel repeating patterns that don’t work, hoping for a different result. Not because they’re incapable, but because they’re conditioned. Then there’s the elephant that doesn’t know it’s free. Tied with a weak rope it could easily break, yet it never tries because it learned long ago that escape was impossible. Most people live the same way, limited not by reality, but by belief. And one of the most freeing truths: nobody’s really thinking about you. The fear of judgment, failure, embarrassment it’s mostly in your head. People are too busy thinking about themselves. He also flips a surprising idea sometimes even a rat is smarter than us. It stops running when it realizes there’s no reward. Humans? We often keep going, even when the path is clearly empty. That’s why this talk still hits hard. Because while most people are waiting for motivation… Very few understand the patterns keeping them stuck.
44:49

🚨 In 1995, a 45-minute talk quietly revealed why most people stay stuck and how a few become unstoppable. Most people have never really understood it. It came from Brian Tracy and instead of hype, he broke down the psychology behind achievement. The ideas hit differently. He explained why humans keep going down the same empty tunnel repeating patterns that don’t work, hoping for a different result. Not because they’re incapable, but because they’re conditioned. Then there’s the elephant that doesn’t know it’s free. Tied with a weak rope it could easily break, yet it never tries because it learned long ago that escape was impossible. Most people live the same way, limited not by reality, but by belief. And one of the most freeing truths: nobody’s really thinking about you. The fear of judgment, failure, embarrassment it’s mostly in your head. People are too busy thinking about themselves. He also flips a surprising idea sometimes even a rat is smarter than us. It stops running when it realizes there’s no reward. Humans? We often keep going, even when the path is clearly empty. That’s why this talk still hits hard. Because while most people are waiting for motivation… Very few understand the patterns keeping them stuck.

Shabnam Parveen

30,678 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад