正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Tony Robbins literally explained why the same person can make a fortune one year and lose it the next with the exact same brain. It is not the market. It is not the strategy. It is the state your body is in when you decide. He coached a trader...

furiokao's profile picture

Furiokao

1,100 subscribers

43,956 次观看 • 14 天前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

3 条评论

Superior 的头像
Superior14 天前

actually a wild perspective on performance psychology

notgwapo 的头像
notgwapo14 天前

interesting take, man. mindset really is everything sometimes. wonder how many traders out there need a tony robbins moment fr.

Nordic 的头像
Nordic14 天前

It’s both

相关视频

Tony Robbins literally explained why Robin Williams achieved everything a person could want and still hung himself. It is not money. It is not fame. It is not an Oscar. It is the one skill that has no formula. He said there are two skills in an extraordinary life. The first is the science of achievement. How to take what you envision and make it real. Most successful people master this one and stop. The second is the art of fulfillment. Making money is a science. Feeling rich is not. Fulfillment is different for every human being alive. You cannot model it from someone else. Williams wanted to make the whole world laugh. He did it. He wanted his own show. It was a hit. He wanted an Academy Award for drama not comedy. He won it. He achieved everything on the list and hung himself. Robbins said he made everyone happy except himself. That is the ultimate failure. Robbins gets calls from multi-billionaires asking for business help. Within ten minutes they admit the truth. They are miserable. They mastered the science and never started the art. He said wealth is not a skill. It is a decision. He lives part-time in Fiji where villagers with nothing are the happiest people he knows. A wealthy American spends years planning to finally be happy. The Fijian says sit on the beach right now. The full interview is free. It will outlast almost everything else in your feed today.
15:13

Tony Robbins literally explained why Robin Williams achieved everything a person could want and still hung himself. It is not money. It is not fame. It is not an Oscar. It is the one skill that has no formula. He said there are two skills in an extraordinary life. The first is the science of achievement. How to take what you envision and make it real. Most successful people master this one and stop. The second is the art of fulfillment. Making money is a science. Feeling rich is not. Fulfillment is different for every human being alive. You cannot model it from someone else. Williams wanted to make the whole world laugh. He did it. He wanted his own show. It was a hit. He wanted an Academy Award for drama not comedy. He won it. He achieved everything on the list and hung himself. Robbins said he made everyone happy except himself. That is the ultimate failure. Robbins gets calls from multi-billionaires asking for business help. Within ten minutes they admit the truth. They are miserable. They mastered the science and never started the art. He said wealth is not a skill. It is a decision. He lives part-time in Fiji where villagers with nothing are the happiest people he knows. A wealthy American spends years planning to finally be happy. The Fijian says sit on the beach right now. The full interview is free. It will outlast almost everything else in your feed today.

Furiokao

253,631 次观看 • 9 天前

A billionaire trader has spent 40 years trying to delete a one-hour documentary. It shows him making $100 million in a single afternoon. He predicted the crash that made it possible three months in advance. He has never explained why he wants the film gone. His name is Paul Tudor Jones. The film is on YouTube. The documentary is called "Trader." PBS filmed it in 1987, three months before Black Monday. Jones was 32 years old, working from a small New York office, wearing shorts and a t-shirt, yelling at his phones, throwing paper across the room, and sleeping under his desk. The film captures him and his research partner Peter Borish overlaying a chart of the 1929 market on 1987, month by month. The two charts tracked within one percent. Borish said this is exactly what happened in 1929. Jones said if the analog holds, October is when it breaks. On October 19, 1987, the Dow fell 22.6 percent in a single day. It remains the largest one-day percentage loss in stock market history. That afternoon, Tudor Jones covered his shorts and made roughly $100 million. He was 33 years old. He was one of the very few traders on the street who came out ahead. He tried to bury the tape because it made him look reckless in a professional world that punished swagger. Twenty years of legal effort did not delete it. Someone kept a copy. It is on YouTube. It has fewer views than most makeup tutorials. The film is not really about a crash. It is about a specific philosophy of trading. Jones is shown building conviction slowly, sizing carefully, then striking hard when the setup arrives. He is never once shown making a random bet. He is shown doing the same thing five times a day, every day, for three months. His signature line, repeated across a 45-year career: "The most important rule of trading is to play great defense, not great offense." He does not try to be right. He tries not to lose. He sets stops tight, cuts positions fast, and never averages down on a loser. Every trade in the film follows this template. Tudor Investment Corp, the fund he founded in 1980, has compounded at roughly 19 percent a year for 45 years. He is 71 years old and still trading. His method has not changed since the film. The lesson: greatness in markets is a refusal, not a talent. Refusal to be reckless. Refusal to be certain. Refusal to average down. Refusal to trust yourself in a drawdown. Tudor Jones has refused those refusals for 45 years. The tape is free. The philosophy is repeated in every trade. Most traders will never watch it.
54:09

A billionaire trader has spent 40 years trying to delete a one-hour documentary. It shows him making $100 million in a single afternoon. He predicted the crash that made it possible three months in advance. He has never explained why he wants the film gone. His name is Paul Tudor Jones. The film is on YouTube. The documentary is called "Trader." PBS filmed it in 1987, three months before Black Monday. Jones was 32 years old, working from a small New York office, wearing shorts and a t-shirt, yelling at his phones, throwing paper across the room, and sleeping under his desk. The film captures him and his research partner Peter Borish overlaying a chart of the 1929 market on 1987, month by month. The two charts tracked within one percent. Borish said this is exactly what happened in 1929. Jones said if the analog holds, October is when it breaks. On October 19, 1987, the Dow fell 22.6 percent in a single day. It remains the largest one-day percentage loss in stock market history. That afternoon, Tudor Jones covered his shorts and made roughly $100 million. He was 33 years old. He was one of the very few traders on the street who came out ahead. He tried to bury the tape because it made him look reckless in a professional world that punished swagger. Twenty years of legal effort did not delete it. Someone kept a copy. It is on YouTube. It has fewer views than most makeup tutorials. The film is not really about a crash. It is about a specific philosophy of trading. Jones is shown building conviction slowly, sizing carefully, then striking hard when the setup arrives. He is never once shown making a random bet. He is shown doing the same thing five times a day, every day, for three months. His signature line, repeated across a 45-year career: "The most important rule of trading is to play great defense, not great offense." He does not try to be right. He tries not to lose. He sets stops tight, cuts positions fast, and never averages down on a loser. Every trade in the film follows this template. Tudor Investment Corp, the fund he founded in 1980, has compounded at roughly 19 percent a year for 45 years. He is 71 years old and still trading. His method has not changed since the film. The lesson: greatness in markets is a refusal, not a talent. Refusal to be reckless. Refusal to be certain. Refusal to average down. Refusal to trust yourself in a drawdown. Tudor Jones has refused those refusals for 45 years. The tape is free. The philosophy is repeated in every trade. Most traders will never watch it.

Veles

3,655,646 次观看 • 2 个月前

Paul Tudor Jones told everyone the market was about to crash - they laughed at him then October 1987 hit and the Dow lost 22% in a day - he made 200% that month he sat down next to Stanley Druckenmiller and they explained how they each saw the move before it happened "losers average losers" "every day I assume every position I have is wrong" two traders. zero losing decades. one conversation. bookmark and watch it today
38:02

Paul Tudor Jones told everyone the market was about to crash - they laughed at him then October 1987 hit and the Dow lost 22% in a day - he made 200% that month he sat down next to Stanley Druckenmiller and they explained how they each saw the move before it happened "losers average losers" "every day I assume every position I have is wrong" two traders. zero losing decades. one conversation. bookmark and watch it today

st1ne

132,501 次观看 • 3 个月前

Jim Rohn at 25 had a degree, a job, a wife and a family. He couldn't afford a $2 box of Girl Scout cookies. By the time he died in 2009, he had spoken to over 5 million people in 56 countries. Tony Robbins paid to sit in his seminars. So did Brian Tracy. His students went on to build hundreds of millions in personal wealth. He changed nothing about his circumstances. He changed one thing about himself. A wealthy man named Earl Shoaff asked to see his list of goals. Rohn had no list. He said if you don't have a list, I can already tell you the balance in your bank account is a few dollars. He was right. Shoaff gave him one sentence that started everything. Don't wish it were easier. Wish you were better. Rohn became a willing student overnight. Within a few years he was a millionaire. Then he spent the next 40 years explaining exactly how it works. To executives, to broke 25-year-olds, to anyone who would sit still long enough to listen. He said income doesn't change until the person changes. If you took all the money in the world and distributed it equally to everyone, it would soon all be back in the same pockets. He explained the law that governs every paycheck. You don't get paid for the time. It takes time to bring value to the market but you get paid for the value, not the time. So the only question that matters at work is not what will you earn. The question is what will you become. He explained the math no one teaches in school. Two people. Same age. Same school. Same company. Same city. Same traffic. Same problems. One makes $1,000 a month. The other makes $2,000. The list is identical. The money is double. Why. Not time. Not luck. Not connections. Value. You can't find more time. But you can become more valuable. He had a friend, Robert, who became a salesman when everyone told him he was insane. His brother mocked him publicly. Told him he'd lose everything. Robert said the way my brother treated me when I became a salesman made me so angry I decided to become rich. He became a millionaire. Rohn called it the formula. Find reasons and the answers come. Without reasons you are just hoping. And hope, he said, is a disease. The man who couldn't buy a $2 cookie went on to teach the most successful people in America how to think about money, time and personal growth. The seminar is free on YouTube. Filmed in 1981. Over two hours. Almost nobody has watched it as a complete explanation of why two people with identical lives end up in completely different places.
2:04:37

Jim Rohn at 25 had a degree, a job, a wife and a family. He couldn't afford a $2 box of Girl Scout cookies. By the time he died in 2009, he had spoken to over 5 million people in 56 countries. Tony Robbins paid to sit in his seminars. So did Brian Tracy. His students went on to build hundreds of millions in personal wealth. He changed nothing about his circumstances. He changed one thing about himself. A wealthy man named Earl Shoaff asked to see his list of goals. Rohn had no list. He said if you don't have a list, I can already tell you the balance in your bank account is a few dollars. He was right. Shoaff gave him one sentence that started everything. Don't wish it were easier. Wish you were better. Rohn became a willing student overnight. Within a few years he was a millionaire. Then he spent the next 40 years explaining exactly how it works. To executives, to broke 25-year-olds, to anyone who would sit still long enough to listen. He said income doesn't change until the person changes. If you took all the money in the world and distributed it equally to everyone, it would soon all be back in the same pockets. He explained the law that governs every paycheck. You don't get paid for the time. It takes time to bring value to the market but you get paid for the value, not the time. So the only question that matters at work is not what will you earn. The question is what will you become. He explained the math no one teaches in school. Two people. Same age. Same school. Same company. Same city. Same traffic. Same problems. One makes $1,000 a month. The other makes $2,000. The list is identical. The money is double. Why. Not time. Not luck. Not connections. Value. You can't find more time. But you can become more valuable. He had a friend, Robert, who became a salesman when everyone told him he was insane. His brother mocked him publicly. Told him he'd lose everything. Robert said the way my brother treated me when I became a salesman made me so angry I decided to become rich. He became a millionaire. Rohn called it the formula. Find reasons and the answers come. Without reasons you are just hoping. And hope, he said, is a disease. The man who couldn't buy a $2 cookie went on to teach the most successful people in America how to think about money, time and personal growth. The seminar is free on YouTube. Filmed in 1981. Over two hours. Almost nobody has watched it as a complete explanation of why two people with identical lives end up in completely different places.

Abyzon

12,195 次观看 • 1 个月前

Tony Robbins literally explained why the rich keep getting richer while everyone else stays stuck. It is not connections. It is not luck. It is a loop most people never realize they are in. He drew four boxes. Potential. Action. Results. Belief. They feed each other in a circle. Low belief means weak action. Weak action means poor results. Poor results confirm the belief. The cycle speeds up and you call it proof. Roger Bannister broke the four-minute mile in 1954 after centuries of failure. He did not get faster legs. He ran it in his head until his brain treated it as done. Within two years, dozens crossed a barrier no human had broken in recorded history. Robbins compared it to a salesman knocking on 100 doors saying "you don't want one of these, do you?" The action is there. But the belief is so weak that his voice and face guarantee failure before he opens his mouth. Then he blames the product. The U.S. savings rate is 2.7%. Not a spending problem. A certainty problem. Most people tried saving once, got a tiny result, and the belief collapsed. See, I knew this wouldn't work. The spiral took over. The person certain they will build wealth finds a way when the math looks impossible. Robbins was $100,000 in debt when he figured this out. Certainty first. Results second. He charges $750,000 per speech to install that loop. The talk is free. Almost nobody watches it.
5:23

Tony Robbins literally explained why the rich keep getting richer while everyone else stays stuck. It is not connections. It is not luck. It is a loop most people never realize they are in. He drew four boxes. Potential. Action. Results. Belief. They feed each other in a circle. Low belief means weak action. Weak action means poor results. Poor results confirm the belief. The cycle speeds up and you call it proof. Roger Bannister broke the four-minute mile in 1954 after centuries of failure. He did not get faster legs. He ran it in his head until his brain treated it as done. Within two years, dozens crossed a barrier no human had broken in recorded history. Robbins compared it to a salesman knocking on 100 doors saying "you don't want one of these, do you?" The action is there. But the belief is so weak that his voice and face guarantee failure before he opens his mouth. Then he blames the product. The U.S. savings rate is 2.7%. Not a spending problem. A certainty problem. Most people tried saving once, got a tiny result, and the belief collapsed. See, I knew this wouldn't work. The spiral took over. The person certain they will build wealth finds a way when the math looks impossible. Robbins was $100,000 in debt when he figured this out. Certainty first. Results second. He charges $750,000 per speech to install that loop. The talk is free. Almost nobody watches it.

Furiokao

167,228 次观看 • 24 天前

PAUL TUDOR JONES WENT ON LIVE TV DURING THE 1987 CRASH AND CALLED EXACTLY WHAT WAS HAPPENING The Dow dropped 22% in a single day. The NYSE tape was delayed over 2 hours. Wall Street was in full panic. Jones had been trading it for two weeks. “The market is doing exactly what it always does: fooling 99.9% of people. Wall Street was uniformly unprepared for this magnitude of a drop. And of course that’s why you got it, because that is the nature of the market.” His advice to investors that day: “Everyone needs to get their house in order. Be prudent. Be conservative. Cut back on whatever speculative investments they have. The next few years will be a period of preservation.” He predicted the crash. He traded it. Then he went on TV and told everyone exactly what to do next.
5:43

PAUL TUDOR JONES WENT ON LIVE TV DURING THE 1987 CRASH AND CALLED EXACTLY WHAT WAS HAPPENING The Dow dropped 22% in a single day. The NYSE tape was delayed over 2 hours. Wall Street was in full panic. Jones had been trading it for two weeks. “The market is doing exactly what it always does: fooling 99.9% of people. Wall Street was uniformly unprepared for this magnitude of a drop. And of course that’s why you got it, because that is the nature of the market.” His advice to investors that day: “Everyone needs to get their house in order. Be prudent. Be conservative. Cut back on whatever speculative investments they have. The next few years will be a period of preservation.” He predicted the crash. He traded it. Then he went on TV and told everyone exactly what to do next.

WOLF

236,462 次观看 • 6 个月前

Threadguy reveals the one trait every great trader he’s met shares “I’ve been having a lot of dinners with these CT legend trader guys, the ones who’ve really done well, and a lot of them are not that impressive. They’re not like these hyper genius guys. But the one common trait amongst all of them is they don’t lose money. Their drawdowns are tiny.” “It’s the same in the books. Druckenmiller’s whole bit is that he basically never had a down month, and they track it in months, not years. Paul Tudor Jones did this too, when he enters a trade, instead of thinking about how much he could make, he thinks about how much he could lose.”
1:11

Threadguy reveals the one trait every great trader he’s met shares “I’ve been having a lot of dinners with these CT legend trader guys, the ones who’ve really done well, and a lot of them are not that impressive. They’re not like these hyper genius guys. But the one common trait amongst all of them is they don’t lose money. Their drawdowns are tiny.” “It’s the same in the books. Druckenmiller’s whole bit is that he basically never had a down month, and they track it in months, not years. Paul Tudor Jones did this too, when he enters a trade, instead of thinking about how much he could make, he thinks about how much he could lose.”

Kai

55,251 次观看 • 3 个月前

Tony Robbins literally explained why watching Bruce Springsteen perform made him want to quit at 23. It is not burnout. It is not failure. It is not doubt. It is the one comparison that poisons what you already built. He was running a seminar in Atlanta for 125 people. Three days at twelve hours each. He gave every person a flower and looked them in the eye to make sure each one transformed. A friend called and said Springsteen was four blocks away playing for 15,000. Christmas show. Clarence on stage. Tony finished his seminar and sprinted to the arena for the second encore. He got to the upper deck and watched the crowd lose their minds. Christmas songs then Born to Run. Three quarters through the song something broke inside him. He thought what I am doing does not matter. This man has 15,000 people screaming his name and I have 125 in a small room. He walked out while the arena was still shaking. He said you are never fair when you compare. You measure against a different path and a different timeline. The number you see tells you nothing about what is actually being built. Beating yourself up feels like drive but it lowers your energy. Lower energy means less output and less impact. The comparison meant to push you forward pulls you backward. This talk is free online. Most people will compare themselves to someone tonight instead of watching it.
32:56

Tony Robbins literally explained why watching Bruce Springsteen perform made him want to quit at 23. It is not burnout. It is not failure. It is not doubt. It is the one comparison that poisons what you already built. He was running a seminar in Atlanta for 125 people. Three days at twelve hours each. He gave every person a flower and looked them in the eye to make sure each one transformed. A friend called and said Springsteen was four blocks away playing for 15,000. Christmas show. Clarence on stage. Tony finished his seminar and sprinted to the arena for the second encore. He got to the upper deck and watched the crowd lose their minds. Christmas songs then Born to Run. Three quarters through the song something broke inside him. He thought what I am doing does not matter. This man has 15,000 people screaming his name and I have 125 in a small room. He walked out while the arena was still shaking. He said you are never fair when you compare. You measure against a different path and a different timeline. The number you see tells you nothing about what is actually being built. Beating yourself up feels like drive but it lowers your energy. Lower energy means less output and less impact. The comparison meant to push you forward pulls you backward. This talk is free online. Most people will compare themselves to someone tonight instead of watching it.

Furiokao

11,116 次观看 • 5 天前

In 1985 IBM was spending $40,000 a day on sales training that wasn't working. Their top rep in the midwest was closing $3.8 million a year. The next best in the same office was at $900,000. Same product. Same territory. Same manager. They brought in Zig Ziglar. Ziglar had spent over 30 years studying why two people with identical circumstances end up in completely different places. IBM paid him. AT&T paid him. General Motors flew their managers in from six states for one afternoon. Mary Kay Ash said she never started her car without his recordings. De Clement, who built a $500 million business, called his material the most important thing he consumed every morning. Ziglar built all of it on one thing he learned by almost destroying himself. He wrote a book. Sent it to three major publishers. All three rejected it. He had already put in print that he weighed 165 pounds with a 34-inch waist. He actually weighed 202 pounds with a 41-inch waist. He published it himself. 25,000 copies. It sold over 25 million. He said the reason most people never reach their potential has nothing to do with talent or opportunity. It has to do with the lid on the jar. You put fleas in a jar. You put a lid on it. They jump and hit the lid. Over and over. After enough time you take the lid off. They never jump out. Not because they can't. Because they decided exactly how high they're allowed to go. And that decision became permanent. He said 90% of people walking into work every morning are doing the same thing. They bumped their head at some point and have been jumping at exactly that height ever since. Same output. Same results. Same income. Every year. He said Roger Bannister ran the first 4-minute mile not because he was physically different from every athlete who tried before him. The barrier was never physical. It was a lid on a jar. Six weeks after Bannister ran it Landy of Australia ran it too. Then eight men ran it in the same race. Over 500 people have done it since. The IBM rep in the midwest closed $3.8 million because he had removed one lid that everyone around him still had on. He didn't see himself as a salesperson. Do customers like salespeople? No. Because salespeople represent someone who is going to fast-talk and maneuver and sell them something they don't need. Do customers like consultants? Always. Because a consultant walks in with one question. What is your problem and how can I help you solve it. Within 30 seconds the customer knows which one they're dealing with. There is no way to fake this. The way you see yourself determines how you walk, talk, ask questions and listen. The customer feels it before you open your mouth. He asked thousands of customers across his career to name their favorite salespeople in one word. The number one answer across every industry was the same. Nice. Not smart. Not aggressive. Not persuasive. Nice. When he asked what they meant they said positive, easy to talk to, trustworthy. I feel good when they walk in. He said everything you do with a customer adds to or takes away from that feeling. Nothing is neutral. Everything counts. The IBM rep retired at 49. Ziglar said the difference between him and the rep doing $900,000 in the same office was not talent. It was the height of the jump. The seminar was recorded in 1981. Free on YouTube. Just under 90 minutes. Almost nobody has watched it as a complete explanation of why two people with the same job, the same product and the same market end up in completely different places ten years later.
1:33:47

In 1985 IBM was spending $40,000 a day on sales training that wasn't working. Their top rep in the midwest was closing $3.8 million a year. The next best in the same office was at $900,000. Same product. Same territory. Same manager. They brought in Zig Ziglar. Ziglar had spent over 30 years studying why two people with identical circumstances end up in completely different places. IBM paid him. AT&T paid him. General Motors flew their managers in from six states for one afternoon. Mary Kay Ash said she never started her car without his recordings. De Clement, who built a $500 million business, called his material the most important thing he consumed every morning. Ziglar built all of it on one thing he learned by almost destroying himself. He wrote a book. Sent it to three major publishers. All three rejected it. He had already put in print that he weighed 165 pounds with a 34-inch waist. He actually weighed 202 pounds with a 41-inch waist. He published it himself. 25,000 copies. It sold over 25 million. He said the reason most people never reach their potential has nothing to do with talent or opportunity. It has to do with the lid on the jar. You put fleas in a jar. You put a lid on it. They jump and hit the lid. Over and over. After enough time you take the lid off. They never jump out. Not because they can't. Because they decided exactly how high they're allowed to go. And that decision became permanent. He said 90% of people walking into work every morning are doing the same thing. They bumped their head at some point and have been jumping at exactly that height ever since. Same output. Same results. Same income. Every year. He said Roger Bannister ran the first 4-minute mile not because he was physically different from every athlete who tried before him. The barrier was never physical. It was a lid on a jar. Six weeks after Bannister ran it Landy of Australia ran it too. Then eight men ran it in the same race. Over 500 people have done it since. The IBM rep in the midwest closed $3.8 million because he had removed one lid that everyone around him still had on. He didn't see himself as a salesperson. Do customers like salespeople? No. Because salespeople represent someone who is going to fast-talk and maneuver and sell them something they don't need. Do customers like consultants? Always. Because a consultant walks in with one question. What is your problem and how can I help you solve it. Within 30 seconds the customer knows which one they're dealing with. There is no way to fake this. The way you see yourself determines how you walk, talk, ask questions and listen. The customer feels it before you open your mouth. He asked thousands of customers across his career to name their favorite salespeople in one word. The number one answer across every industry was the same. Nice. Not smart. Not aggressive. Not persuasive. Nice. When he asked what they meant they said positive, easy to talk to, trustworthy. I feel good when they walk in. He said everything you do with a customer adds to or takes away from that feeling. Nothing is neutral. Everything counts. The IBM rep retired at 49. Ziglar said the difference between him and the rep doing $900,000 in the same office was not talent. It was the height of the jump. The seminar was recorded in 1981. Free on YouTube. Just under 90 minutes. Almost nobody has watched it as a complete explanation of why two people with the same job, the same product and the same market end up in completely different places ten years later.

Potato

97,114 次观看 • 1 个月前

A hedge fund manager put a jar of 1,776 jelly beans in front of a room at Google and proved in two rounds why most investors will always lose money. for free. His name is Joel Greenblatt. Gotham Capital. 50% a year for a decade. he asked the room to guess how many jelly beans were in the jar. First round: everyone wrote their guess silently. no talking. no looking around. the average was 1,771. five off. almost perfect. Second round: people said their guesses out loud. heard each other. adjusted. the average collapsed to 850. same room. same jar. the only thing that changed was influence. He told the room: the second guess is the stock market. everyone knows what they just read in the paper. what the guy next to them said. what they saw in the news. the cold independent guess was better. that is not how the market works. but that is where the opportunity is. Then he showed 20 years of data. the cheapest 20% of stocks averaged 38% a year. the most expensive averaged the least. the strategy is simple. the reason it still works is that people are still crazy. and they always will be. 55 minutes. one jar. still free.
55:04

A hedge fund manager put a jar of 1,776 jelly beans in front of a room at Google and proved in two rounds why most investors will always lose money. for free. His name is Joel Greenblatt. Gotham Capital. 50% a year for a decade. he asked the room to guess how many jelly beans were in the jar. First round: everyone wrote their guess silently. no talking. no looking around. the average was 1,771. five off. almost perfect. Second round: people said their guesses out loud. heard each other. adjusted. the average collapsed to 850. same room. same jar. the only thing that changed was influence. He told the room: the second guess is the stock market. everyone knows what they just read in the paper. what the guy next to them said. what they saw in the news. the cold independent guess was better. that is not how the market works. but that is where the opportunity is. Then he showed 20 years of data. the cheapest 20% of stocks averaged 38% a year. the most expensive averaged the least. the strategy is simple. the reason it still works is that people are still crazy. and they always will be. 55 minutes. one jar. still free.

Tigerflow

1,755,422 次观看 • 1 个月前

A man who has made 19% a year for forty-five years spent most of them telling people Warren Buffett was just lucky. Then he listened to a podcast and apologised on air. "Wow, this guy is a genius, and I've been the biggest fool all along." That is Paul Tudor Jones. His original argument was never stupid, which is the part worth staying for. Buffett, he thought, was in the right place at the right time, riding the longest bull market in history. Put the same man in Japan starting in 1989 and see how well the genius holds up. It is a real objection. The Nikkei peaked in December 1989 and did not get back there until February 2024. Thirty-four years underwater. Buy and hold would have ruined you. He changed his mind anyway. He now calls Buffett the OG of compound interest, and then he says the line that should stop you. "He understood the power of compound interest at age nine, while I brilliantly avoided it throughout my entire career." That is not a man who failed at anything. So what exactly did he avoid? Selling. Run the same 19% two ways. Hold everything and pay capital gains once at the end, and forty years turns a dollar into 842. Realise your gains every year and pay tax as you go, and the same 19% turns a dollar into 287. Identical returns. Roughly three times the money, purely from not touching it. That is the price of being right often instead of being right once and then waiting. And here is what makes this honest rather than a lecture. Jones knows all of it now and still cannot do it. He says plainly he could not sit through a 50% drawdown, that his own wiring will not permit it. He wondered aloud why he couldn't just believe in America and ride it out. He can't. Fifty years of reflexes do not get argued away by arithmetic. So the lesson is not to go and be Buffett. It is to work out which one you actually are before the market tells you, because the two strategies are not interchangeable and neither are the people who run them. He is 71. He apologised to a man he had doubted for decades, and then admitted he would probably do it the same way again.
1:03:58

A man who has made 19% a year for forty-five years spent most of them telling people Warren Buffett was just lucky. Then he listened to a podcast and apologised on air. "Wow, this guy is a genius, and I've been the biggest fool all along." That is Paul Tudor Jones. His original argument was never stupid, which is the part worth staying for. Buffett, he thought, was in the right place at the right time, riding the longest bull market in history. Put the same man in Japan starting in 1989 and see how well the genius holds up. It is a real objection. The Nikkei peaked in December 1989 and did not get back there until February 2024. Thirty-four years underwater. Buy and hold would have ruined you. He changed his mind anyway. He now calls Buffett the OG of compound interest, and then he says the line that should stop you. "He understood the power of compound interest at age nine, while I brilliantly avoided it throughout my entire career." That is not a man who failed at anything. So what exactly did he avoid? Selling. Run the same 19% two ways. Hold everything and pay capital gains once at the end, and forty years turns a dollar into 842. Realise your gains every year and pay tax as you go, and the same 19% turns a dollar into 287. Identical returns. Roughly three times the money, purely from not touching it. That is the price of being right often instead of being right once and then waiting. And here is what makes this honest rather than a lecture. Jones knows all of it now and still cannot do it. He says plainly he could not sit through a 50% drawdown, that his own wiring will not permit it. He wondered aloud why he couldn't just believe in America and ride it out. He can't. Fifty years of reflexes do not get argued away by arithmetic. So the lesson is not to go and be Buffett. It is to work out which one you actually are before the market tells you, because the two strategies are not interchangeable and neither are the people who run them. He is 71. He apologised to a man he had doubted for decades, and then admitted he would probably do it the same way again.

Veles

48,073 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨👀 KEITH JONES TAKES THE STAND — TESTIFIES ABOUT ALLEGED $1 MILLION HIT ON QUANDO RONDO Keith Jones took the stand and told the courtroom that he is currently in federal custody after pleading guilty to charges involving murder-for-hire and stalking resulting in murder. The prosecution then began walking Jones through photos and exhibits connected to the alleged shooting. 📸 THE GAS STATION SHOOTING Prosecutors showed a photo from the shooting at the gas station and asked Jones to identify the people pictured. • Jones identified himself as one of the shooters. • He said he did not know the name of the person who was killed. • When asked who the intended target was, Jones identified Quando Rondo. Another photo was shown of the group walking toward the gas station through an alley. Jones was asked to explain what was happening in the image. Prosecutors then showed an image from In-N-Out, and Jones confirmed that was where they went after the shooting. ⏱️ 20–30 MINUTES AFTER THE SHOOTING Jones testified that it took approximately 20–30 minutes to get to In-N-Out after the shooting. When prosecutors asked whether he could identify anyone who participated in the killing of Lil Pab, Jones said yes. He identified: • Brown Eyes • Dede • Himself Jones also identified the clothing worn by the people in the photographs, including Dede’s blue outfit. The defense objected, arguing that prosecutors were leading the witness. 🚨 WHAT DID JONES SAY ABOUT DURK? Prosecutors asked Jones if he knew Durk. Jones said yes. When asked whether Durk was involved in the murder of Lil Pab, Jones testified: “He wasn’t there with us, but he was a part of it.” 🏙️ CHICAGO / GANG AFFILIATIONS Jones testified that he is from Chicago’s South Side. He said: • Dede is from Taytown. • Jones identified himself as a Black Disciple. • He identified Dede as a Black Disciple. • He said Brown Eyes was not a BD, but a Vice Lord. • Tony C was also identified as a Vice Lord. • Jones said he knew about OTF but was not a member. 📱 THE FACETIME CALL Jones testified that he became involved after receiving a FaceTime call involving Dede, Brown Eyes and Tony C. He explained to the jury how the FaceTime call worked and said that during the conversation they discussed a location connected to “Dude,” whom Jones identified as Quando Rondo. Jones testified that they were told: “Bro was offering a million for us.” Prosecutors asked Jones if he understood who “Bro” was. Jones said he believed it was Durk, explaining that he considered Durk the person who had the money and said he had heard him referred to as “Bro” before. 💰 THE ALLEGED $1 MILLION Jones testified that he believed there was $1 million being offered to go after and kill Quando Rondo. When prosecutors asked why he believed the offer was real, Jones referenced seeing Durk with a large amount of money during a Million Dollars Worth of Game interview. The prosecution then displayed an exhibit from that interview. Jones testified that he was actually present when it was filmed in Taytown. He said he was positioned on the left side of the image and claimed he could hear what was being discussed because he was there. The judge later instructed the jury that statements concerning the Million Dollars Worth of Game exhibit were not admissible as to Brown Eyes. ✈️ WHY DID JONES GO TO CALIFORNIA? Prosecutors asked Jones whether he would have traveled to California if he believed the trip was going to be for free. Jones said no. He testified that he went because he believed he was going to get paid and said he was thinking about what he could do with the money. Jones said he sent his information to Dede.
0:25

🚨👀 KEITH JONES TAKES THE STAND — TESTIFIES ABOUT ALLEGED $1 MILLION HIT ON QUANDO RONDO Keith Jones took the stand and told the courtroom that he is currently in federal custody after pleading guilty to charges involving murder-for-hire and stalking resulting in murder. The prosecution then began walking Jones through photos and exhibits connected to the alleged shooting. 📸 THE GAS STATION SHOOTING Prosecutors showed a photo from the shooting at the gas station and asked Jones to identify the people pictured. • Jones identified himself as one of the shooters. • He said he did not know the name of the person who was killed. • When asked who the intended target was, Jones identified Quando Rondo. Another photo was shown of the group walking toward the gas station through an alley. Jones was asked to explain what was happening in the image. Prosecutors then showed an image from In-N-Out, and Jones confirmed that was where they went after the shooting. ⏱️ 20–30 MINUTES AFTER THE SHOOTING Jones testified that it took approximately 20–30 minutes to get to In-N-Out after the shooting. When prosecutors asked whether he could identify anyone who participated in the killing of Lil Pab, Jones said yes. He identified: • Brown Eyes • Dede • Himself Jones also identified the clothing worn by the people in the photographs, including Dede’s blue outfit. The defense objected, arguing that prosecutors were leading the witness. 🚨 WHAT DID JONES SAY ABOUT DURK? Prosecutors asked Jones if he knew Durk. Jones said yes. When asked whether Durk was involved in the murder of Lil Pab, Jones testified: “He wasn’t there with us, but he was a part of it.” 🏙️ CHICAGO / GANG AFFILIATIONS Jones testified that he is from Chicago’s South Side. He said: • Dede is from Taytown. • Jones identified himself as a Black Disciple. • He identified Dede as a Black Disciple. • He said Brown Eyes was not a BD, but a Vice Lord. • Tony C was also identified as a Vice Lord. • Jones said he knew about OTF but was not a member. 📱 THE FACETIME CALL Jones testified that he became involved after receiving a FaceTime call involving Dede, Brown Eyes and Tony C. He explained to the jury how the FaceTime call worked and said that during the conversation they discussed a location connected to “Dude,” whom Jones identified as Quando Rondo. Jones testified that they were told: “Bro was offering a million for us.” Prosecutors asked Jones if he understood who “Bro” was. Jones said he believed it was Durk, explaining that he considered Durk the person who had the money and said he had heard him referred to as “Bro” before. 💰 THE ALLEGED $1 MILLION Jones testified that he believed there was $1 million being offered to go after and kill Quando Rondo. When prosecutors asked why he believed the offer was real, Jones referenced seeing Durk with a large amount of money during a Million Dollars Worth of Game interview. The prosecution then displayed an exhibit from that interview. Jones testified that he was actually present when it was filmed in Taytown. He said he was positioned on the left side of the image and claimed he could hear what was being discussed because he was there. The judge later instructed the jury that statements concerning the Million Dollars Worth of Game exhibit were not admissible as to Brown Eyes. ✈️ WHY DID JONES GO TO CALIFORNIA? Prosecutors asked Jones whether he would have traveled to California if he believed the trip was going to be for free. Jones said no. He testified that he went because he believed he was going to get paid and said he was thinking about what he could do with the money. Jones said he sent his information to Dede.

Cousin Tino ™️

120,720 次观看 • 1 个月前

Jensen Huang said the problem with AI was never the technology. It was the same problem we had when cars arrived and kids kept dying in the streets. He was asked why people are so afraid of AI. He did not dodge it. He reached back a hundred years. When cars first showed up, people said cars killed children. They believed the machine was hunting kids down. It sounds insane now. But the fear was real. Kids used to play in the streets. That was normal. Then cars arrived and children started dying. The car was not evil. The world it entered was built for a slower one. So we changed the world around it. We built sidewalks. We built crosswalks. We invented jaywalking. We added seat belts. We taught kids not to play in the road. None of that was one fix. It was a whole new set of rules layered on at the same time. His point about AI is the same. The technology is powerful. The fear is not stupid. But you do not freeze the machine. You build the norms around it. Then he gave the simplest advice in the whole interview. If you do not know how to use AI, open it up and ask it how to use AI. Try it before you judge it. We did not ban the car. We taught the world how to live with it. (Watch the full interview on YouTube at Associated Press)
3:14

Jensen Huang said the problem with AI was never the technology. It was the same problem we had when cars arrived and kids kept dying in the streets. He was asked why people are so afraid of AI. He did not dodge it. He reached back a hundred years. When cars first showed up, people said cars killed children. They believed the machine was hunting kids down. It sounds insane now. But the fear was real. Kids used to play in the streets. That was normal. Then cars arrived and children started dying. The car was not evil. The world it entered was built for a slower one. So we changed the world around it. We built sidewalks. We built crosswalks. We invented jaywalking. We added seat belts. We taught kids not to play in the road. None of that was one fix. It was a whole new set of rules layered on at the same time. His point about AI is the same. The technology is powerful. The fear is not stupid. But you do not freeze the machine. You build the norms around it. Then he gave the simplest advice in the whole interview. If you do not know how to use AI, open it up and ask it how to use AI. Try it before you judge it. We did not ban the car. We taught the world how to live with it. (Watch the full interview on YouTube at Associated Press)

Ihtesham Ali

19,268 次观看 • 3 个月前

Tony Aguilar told the world he watched a Gazan boy die. He named him Amir. This became one of the biggest and most shocking stories on X and the global media. And it was all a LIE. He said the child kissed his face, said thank you in English, walked back into the crowd, and took a round in the torso and another in the leg. Dead. He said it on television. He said it in freaking Congress. He said it on Tucker. X treated it like a verdict. The boy’s actual name was Abdul Rahim Muhammad Hamden. His family calls him Abood. He was eight. Aguilar had the wrong name, the wrong death, and a fake story that didn’t match the bodycam standing next to him. The contractor who filmed the encounter said the kiss-and-English scene never happened. The stepmother said the child was still in the house two months after Aguilar had already buried him on air. Then they found him. Alive. Same shirt. Same face. Moved out of Gaza with his mother because a living boy is a problem for people who needed a corpse. Hamas didn’t want that file closed. A dead child is a weapon. A child who can still speak is an inconvenience. MSNBC eventually walked it back. Most of the accounts that ran the funeral never ran the resurrection. Astonishingly, Aguilar kept talking. He dug deeper and still told the story even after the boy was revealed alive. The lie had already done the work. It put a target on a child who had come for food and got turned into a prop. That’s simply NOT a mistake in the fog of war. That’s a man who needed a body, fame, money, and celebrity, so he invented the body, and the media didn’t even wait to see if the grave was empty. They ran with it simply to harm Israel and the United States.
1:41

Tony Aguilar told the world he watched a Gazan boy die. He named him Amir. This became one of the biggest and most shocking stories on X and the global media. And it was all a LIE. He said the child kissed his face, said thank you in English, walked back into the crowd, and took a round in the torso and another in the leg. Dead. He said it on television. He said it in freaking Congress. He said it on Tucker. X treated it like a verdict. The boy’s actual name was Abdul Rahim Muhammad Hamden. His family calls him Abood. He was eight. Aguilar had the wrong name, the wrong death, and a fake story that didn’t match the bodycam standing next to him. The contractor who filmed the encounter said the kiss-and-English scene never happened. The stepmother said the child was still in the house two months after Aguilar had already buried him on air. Then they found him. Alive. Same shirt. Same face. Moved out of Gaza with his mother because a living boy is a problem for people who needed a corpse. Hamas didn’t want that file closed. A dead child is a weapon. A child who can still speak is an inconvenience. MSNBC eventually walked it back. Most of the accounts that ran the funeral never ran the resurrection. Astonishingly, Aguilar kept talking. He dug deeper and still told the story even after the boy was revealed alive. The lie had already done the work. It put a target on a child who had come for food and got turned into a prop. That’s simply NOT a mistake in the fog of war. That’s a man who needed a body, fame, money, and celebrity, so he invented the body, and the media didn’t even wait to see if the grave was empty. They ran with it simply to harm Israel and the United States.

Mor Edge Insight

42,563 次观看 • 9 天前

Paul Tudor Jones shorted the 1987 crash and made 200% the same week the market lost a quarter of its value now he's pointing at a date on the calendar "it feels like October 1999" back then the NASDAQ doubled in five months - then the whole thing blew off the top he says the setup is here again: easy financial conditions, rate cuts instead of hikes, retail piling in, speculative mania building the difference this time is the deficit, not a surplus so he's not sitting it out - he wants gold, crypto, and the NASDAQ, all at once
5:38

Paul Tudor Jones shorted the 1987 crash and made 200% the same week the market lost a quarter of its value now he's pointing at a date on the calendar "it feels like October 1999" back then the NASDAQ doubled in five months - then the whole thing blew off the top he says the setup is here again: easy financial conditions, rate cuts instead of hikes, retail piling in, speculative mania building the difference this time is the deficit, not a surplus so he's not sitting it out - he wants gold, crypto, and the NASDAQ, all at once

Loofy

281,699 次观看 • 2 个月前

A pilot put a passenger jet down on a river and got every person on board off alive. Within days, investigators were asking him what he had eaten for lunch. He told them a tuna sandwich. Then they asked whether he had had a candy bar. Whether he had had a soda. That is not small talk. There is a precise reason those 2 questions could have ended his career, and Tom Hanks lays it out in about 4 sentences. The pilot is Chesley Sullenberger. Hanks played him, spent time with him first, and says the man walked him through the entire script telling him which parts never happened. As Hanks was told it, the stake was money. If the board could establish that the pilot did 1 thing wrong, the insurance on an airplane he puts at 17 million dollars would not have to be paid out. Every question in that room was built for that. It went on for the better part of a year. In the film it takes days, because films cannot afford a year. What was happening to him has a name in psychology. Baruch Fischhoff described it in 1975 and called it creeping determinism. Once you know how something ended, the ending looks like it was always coming, and every road you did not take looks like it was sitting right there, clearly marked, the whole time. Which is why the question "why did you not do this instead" is close to unanswerable. It is asked by people who know the ending, to a person who did not have it. There is a second effect underneath, well documented in aviation and in medicine. The person at the centre of the investigation frequently comes out of it in worse condition than the people he saved. Researchers gave that person a name. He is the second victim. Hanks is 67 when he says this, and what he admires is not the landing. It is a distinction he makes in 1 sentence near the end, and it is the whole reason he told the story at all. He saved everyone on that plane. Then he spent a year proving he had not eaten a candy bar.
12:36

A pilot put a passenger jet down on a river and got every person on board off alive. Within days, investigators were asking him what he had eaten for lunch. He told them a tuna sandwich. Then they asked whether he had had a candy bar. Whether he had had a soda. That is not small talk. There is a precise reason those 2 questions could have ended his career, and Tom Hanks lays it out in about 4 sentences. The pilot is Chesley Sullenberger. Hanks played him, spent time with him first, and says the man walked him through the entire script telling him which parts never happened. As Hanks was told it, the stake was money. If the board could establish that the pilot did 1 thing wrong, the insurance on an airplane he puts at 17 million dollars would not have to be paid out. Every question in that room was built for that. It went on for the better part of a year. In the film it takes days, because films cannot afford a year. What was happening to him has a name in psychology. Baruch Fischhoff described it in 1975 and called it creeping determinism. Once you know how something ended, the ending looks like it was always coming, and every road you did not take looks like it was sitting right there, clearly marked, the whole time. Which is why the question "why did you not do this instead" is close to unanswerable. It is asked by people who know the ending, to a person who did not have it. There is a second effect underneath, well documented in aviation and in medicine. The person at the centre of the investigation frequently comes out of it in worse condition than the people he saved. Researchers gave that person a name. He is the second victim. Hanks is 67 when he says this, and what he admires is not the landing. It is a distinction he makes in 1 sentence near the end, and it is the whole reason he told the story at all. He saved everyone on that plane. Then he spent a year proving he had not eaten a candy bar.

Stefan.

210,938 次观看 • 1 个月前

One guy built a wedding camera app in a month and it now makes him over $1,000,000 a year. No team, no investors, no marketing budget. 100,000 downloads in the first month. Zero dollars on ads. He did not bolt marketing onto the product. He made using the product the marketing. You cannot use the app alone. The host has to pull every guest into it. One wedding is not one user. It is 200 people scanning the same code in one evening. The guest liked it at someone else's wedding. A month later he throws his own event and brings his own crowd. The loop spins for free. It does not look like an ad. To the guest it is a gift. So they install it gladly. $2 to $50 subscriptions. 5% pay. That is $100,000 a month. He did not win on budget. He sewed the growth into the product itself. Could you build the loop, or is it just luck?
0:23

One guy built a wedding camera app in a month and it now makes him over $1,000,000 a year. No team, no investors, no marketing budget. 100,000 downloads in the first month. Zero dollars on ads. He did not bolt marketing onto the product. He made using the product the marketing. You cannot use the app alone. The host has to pull every guest into it. One wedding is not one user. It is 200 people scanning the same code in one evening. The guest liked it at someone else's wedding. A month later he throws his own event and brings his own crowd. The loop spins for free. It does not look like an ad. To the guest it is a gift. So they install it gladly. $2 to $50 subscriptions. 5% pay. That is $100,000 a month. He did not win on budget. He sewed the growth into the product itself. Could you build the loop, or is it just luck?

Marlow

513,913 次观看 • 2 个月前

Tucker Carlson Drops Opening Monologue About Alex Jones: We have a ruling class in the United States defined by its hatreds. Not its loves, not its hopes, but by its hatreds. They hate all kinds of people, large groups of people: the deplorables, the bitter clingers, America's entire blue-collar population, the unfashionable people. They're hated by the people who run our country. But no one is hated more by them than a man called Alex Jones. Alex Jones is the single-most-censored man in all American history. He was the first media figure in our history to be completely erased in one day. Deplatformed. Alex Jones was deplatformed before it was a common term. And not just deplatformed — sued, attacked. They attempted to criminally charge him. What did Alex Jones do wrong? Alex Jones didn't rape anybody. He didn't loot Macy's. He didn't burn a police station. He didn't invent a fake cryptocurrency and loot pension funds. He didn't start a pointless war that made this country poorer and more disorganized. He didn't open the southern border. No. Alex Jones had opinions that deeply rattled the people who run America. In fact, rattled a lot of us. And I'll just confess that I first heard of Alex Jones when he questioned the official story behind 9/11. And I, speaking for myself, was deeply offended by this. I didn't take any time to find out what he was saying, but I was bothered by the idea that this defining event in American history, which changed the life of everyone who lived here then, might not actually have unfolded as we were told it did. And that possibility was too destabilizing. And I remember feeling resentment toward Alex Jones for saying that. But several years later, I went up in Austin, Texas, and through a chain of circumstances, wound up meeting Alex Jones. And I learned what everyone who has met him now knows, which is Alex Jones is not a crazy person. Alex Jones has said pretty far out things on TV from time to time. Not that far out. He hasn't said men can become women or Ukraine is a democracy. But within the bounds of, say, cable news, pretty far out. But fundamentally, Alex Jones is right about a lot of things. And, in fact, that's why they don't like him. Alex Jones has an uncanny, really an amazing ability to predict events before they happen. He has called it and he's done it on tape again and again, to the point where it's a meme on the Internet. "Alex Jones prophet," not conspiracy nut, prophet. But when you dig into Alex Jones's predictions, they are so spot-on that it's remarkable. How does he do this? We're guessing there's a kind of spiritual sensitivity to Alex Jones. Maybe that's his secret. He was displaying this years before the average person in this country even thought about matters like that. Now it's pretty obvious to most people that the current war going on in this country is taking place in ways you can't see it most of the time. But ten years ago, people were not thinking that way. Alex Jones was. And so, we thought it'd be interesting to sit down and talk to Alex Jones, the man. He joins us now in our studio.
3:07

Tucker Carlson Drops Opening Monologue About Alex Jones: We have a ruling class in the United States defined by its hatreds. Not its loves, not its hopes, but by its hatreds. They hate all kinds of people, large groups of people: the deplorables, the bitter clingers, America's entire blue-collar population, the unfashionable people. They're hated by the people who run our country. But no one is hated more by them than a man called Alex Jones. Alex Jones is the single-most-censored man in all American history. He was the first media figure in our history to be completely erased in one day. Deplatformed. Alex Jones was deplatformed before it was a common term. And not just deplatformed — sued, attacked. They attempted to criminally charge him. What did Alex Jones do wrong? Alex Jones didn't rape anybody. He didn't loot Macy's. He didn't burn a police station. He didn't invent a fake cryptocurrency and loot pension funds. He didn't start a pointless war that made this country poorer and more disorganized. He didn't open the southern border. No. Alex Jones had opinions that deeply rattled the people who run America. In fact, rattled a lot of us. And I'll just confess that I first heard of Alex Jones when he questioned the official story behind 9/11. And I, speaking for myself, was deeply offended by this. I didn't take any time to find out what he was saying, but I was bothered by the idea that this defining event in American history, which changed the life of everyone who lived here then, might not actually have unfolded as we were told it did. And that possibility was too destabilizing. And I remember feeling resentment toward Alex Jones for saying that. But several years later, I went up in Austin, Texas, and through a chain of circumstances, wound up meeting Alex Jones. And I learned what everyone who has met him now knows, which is Alex Jones is not a crazy person. Alex Jones has said pretty far out things on TV from time to time. Not that far out. He hasn't said men can become women or Ukraine is a democracy. But within the bounds of, say, cable news, pretty far out. But fundamentally, Alex Jones is right about a lot of things. And, in fact, that's why they don't like him. Alex Jones has an uncanny, really an amazing ability to predict events before they happen. He has called it and he's done it on tape again and again, to the point where it's a meme on the Internet. "Alex Jones prophet," not conspiracy nut, prophet. But when you dig into Alex Jones's predictions, they are so spot-on that it's remarkable. How does he do this? We're guessing there's a kind of spiritual sensitivity to Alex Jones. Maybe that's his secret. He was displaying this years before the average person in this country even thought about matters like that. Now it's pretty obvious to most people that the current war going on in this country is taking place in ways you can't see it most of the time. But ten years ago, people were not thinking that way. Alex Jones was. And so, we thought it'd be interesting to sit down and talk to Alex Jones, the man. He joins us now in our studio.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

510,710 次观看 • 2 年前

Kendrick Perkins CALLS OUT Lebron for his Performance against the Rockets and says the Lakers should Trade him "When hes not engaged or feels some type of way it speaks in his body language. Last night his body language was awful, he was not engaged, he was pouting, he was moping, he walking up and down the floor, he was complaining. Lebron and the Lakers relationship has run its course, and they need to figure out a solution and the solution is him not being in a Los Angeles Lakers uniform"
1:18

Kendrick Perkins CALLS OUT Lebron for his Performance against the Rockets and says the Lakers should Trade him "When hes not engaged or feels some type of way it speaks in his body language. Last night his body language was awful, he was not engaged, he was pouting, he was moping, he walking up and down the floor, he was complaining. Lebron and the Lakers relationship has run its course, and they need to figure out a solution and the solution is him not being in a Los Angeles Lakers uniform"

TheTruth

190,734 次观看 • 9 个月前