正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Training My Son $ES PM Session Inside The Range, IFVG, Premium FVG Draw, Max Partials, Stopped On Profitable Stop Music Credit: Darci - Rose Pedals

The Inner Circle Trader

841,709 subscribers

308,639 次观看 • 3 年前 •via X (Twitter)

教育财经音乐

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 条评论

The Inner Circle Trader 的头像

The Inner Circle Trader3 年前

$NQ rather lol oops.

Stoic Trader 的头像

Stoic Trader3 年前

One Trading Model for Life 🔥

ICT Concepts 的头像

ICT Concepts3 年前

That song is 🔥🔥🔥.

Based Trading Collective 的头像

Based Trading Collective3 年前

Precision as always. Instead of retirement have you considered a run as a DJ? 😂

The Inner Circle Trader 的头像

The Inner Circle Trader3 年前

lol

Master Fren 的头像

Master Fren3 年前

😊 My tp was hit before I could modify it. Didn’t have it set right in the terminal. I don’t know why I like showing my progress to you. Maybe I’ll stop. I’m just so happy.

SabaFlav 的头像

SabaFlav3 年前

I see some things in this video that I really appreciate thank you, question, why the recent increase in NQ trades and not ES? @I_Am_The_ICT

Ryan 的头像

Ryan3 年前

boom

Rowi 的头像

Rowi3 年前

Got this one omg. Thank you dad 🙈

Prodigy Futures 的头像

Prodigy Futures3 年前

Wow. ICT makes it look like if you learn all of this time wasting markers , change your chart background color 😂 You’ll be profitable. Here , this is how simple trading is.

The Inner Circle Trader 的头像

The Inner Circle Trader3 年前

@PradageeTrading Where can I watch you trade?

相关视频

PM Session ES FOMC Minutes NWOG Draw On Liquidity & FVG Entries... stopped out after partials & reentry. Music Credit: Khalid - Motion

PM Session ES FOMC Minutes NWOG Draw On Liquidity & FVG Entries... stopped out after partials & reentry. Music Credit: Khalid - Motion

The Inner Circle Trader

160,235 次观看 • 3 年前

ES PM Session Lunch Liquidity & Session High Draw On Liquidity Opening Range Gap, Reclaimed +OB, IFVG Music Credit: Ghost - If You Have Ghost

ES PM Session Lunch Liquidity & Session High Draw On Liquidity Opening Range Gap, Reclaimed +OB, IFVG Music Credit: Ghost - If You Have Ghost

The Inner Circle Trader

176,365 次观看 • 3 年前

#NQ Am Session Long Draw On Liquidity - Daily Volume Imbalance IFVG Entry - Pyramided Scaling Partials at D.V.I. Quadrants Levels. Music Credit: Alphabet Pont - New York Nights

#NQ Am Session Long Draw On Liquidity - Daily Volume Imbalance IFVG Entry - Pyramided Scaling Partials at D.V.I. Quadrants Levels. Music Credit: Alphabet Pont - New York Nights

The Inner Circle Trader

290,083 次观看 • 3 年前

$#NQ Opening Range Expansion To Sellside Premium FVG\Volume Imbalance Entry Stop Loss Above Premium Wick C.E. Music Credit: The Used - Burning Down The House$

#NQ Opening Range Expansion To Sellside Premium FVG\Volume Imbalance Entry Stop Loss Above Premium Wick C.E. Music Credit: The Used - Burning Down The House

The Inner Circle Trader

173,214 次观看 • 3 年前

The condensed concentrated version of my #NQ PM Session. Music Credit: ICT Droning On...

The condensed concentrated version of my #NQ PM Session. Music Credit: ICT Droning On...

The Inner Circle Trader

142,876 次观看 • 3 年前

We wanted to see what 09:30 Opening Range would be used for. We wanted the 60min FVG, based on my Draw livestream remark. The drop at 09:30 was the "fake move" as I mentioned would be the fade. Used inside +Breaker into the 60min FVG we aimed for. How did this pan out?

We wanted to see what 09:30 Opening Range would be used for. We wanted the 60min FVG, based on my Draw livestream remark. The drop at 09:30 was the "fake move" as I mentioned would be the fade. Used inside +Breaker into the 60min FVG we aimed for. How did this pan out?

The Inner Circle Trader

139,375 次观看 • 3 年前

ESU2023 June 13, 2023 Using the Draw On Liquidity that I covered in today's Livestream, I selected my Inversion Breaker for a long, targeted Premium Wick C.E. and Buyside & closed manually to save the Stop. Music Credit: Serhat Durmus - La Câlin

ESU2023 June 13, 2023 Using the Draw On Liquidity that I covered in today's Livestream, I selected my Inversion Breaker for a long, targeted Premium Wick C.E. and Buyside & closed manually to save the Stop. Music Credit: Serhat Durmus - La Câlin

The Inner Circle Trader

265,589 次观看 • 3 年前

Most coaches plan sessions The best coaches build development 🚨 Sneak Peek from Lesson 1 of my new course 👇 👀 ⚽️ 🎓 𝐃𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐥𝐨𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐠 & 𝐃𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐄𝐱𝐜𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐂𝐨𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐒𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 ❌ Stop asking: “What drill should I run tonight?” ✅ Start asking: “What is this session developing over the next 6 months?” One question changes everything. Inside the course we’ll explore: ⚽ Why isolated sessions often fail to create long-term player development 🧩 How every training session should connect to the bigger picture 🎯 How to ensure every practice has a clear developmental purpose Most coaches focus on what happens in the next 90 minutes Elite coaches think about what happens in the next 90 sessions If you’re serious about improving your coaching ‘on the grass’, this course will challenge how you design training forever Limited places available 👇 Details: #FootballCoaching #SoccerCoaching #CoachEducation #YouthDevelopment #PlayerDevelopment

Most coaches plan sessions The best coaches build development 🚨 Sneak Peek from Lesson 1 of my new course 👇 👀 ⚽️ 🎓 𝐃𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐥𝐨𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐠 & 𝐃𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐄𝐱𝐜𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐂𝐨𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐒𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 ❌ Stop asking: “What drill should I run tonight?” ✅ Start asking: “What is this session developing over the next 6 months?” One question changes everything. Inside the course we’ll explore: ⚽ Why isolated sessions often fail to create long-term player development 🧩 How every training session should connect to the bigger picture 🎯 How to ensure every practice has a clear developmental purpose Most coaches focus on what happens in the next 90 minutes Elite coaches think about what happens in the next 90 sessions If you’re serious about improving your coaching ‘on the grass’, this course will challenge how you design training forever Limited places available 👇 Details: #FootballCoaching #SoccerCoaching #CoachEducation #YouthDevelopment #PlayerDevelopment

Ray Power

86,780 次观看 • 4 个月前

On 18 June 2026, at around 1 PM, I was on my way to the University of Zimbabwe bus stop to catch a kombi into town when I was approached by a young woman with braids wearing a pink jacket. She stopped me and said, “Sister, please wait.” She then claimed that I had dropped a pink wallet. I told her that I did not own any pink wallet. She then said that another woman had picked up the wallet and that she had found money inside it. She suggested that if the wallet was not mine, we could all share the money. The woman she referred to was wearing an orange skirt and was walking ahead of us. When she was called over, she stopped and pretended to confirm that the wallet did not belong to me. Before they could continue with their story, I switched on my phone camera and started recording. I confronted them and asked if they were not ashamed of trying to scam people in Mt Pleasant using the well-known “chadonha” trick. What I did not know was that they had a getaway vehicle nearby. The driver noticed that I was recording and signalled to them. The woman in the pink jacket then said something to the effect of, “Should we go back?” They immediately ran towards a vehicle and quickly got inside before driving away. The vehicle they used was a Honda Fit, registration number AGO 2350. Zimbabwe Republic Police

On 18 June 2026, at around 1 PM, I was on my way to the University of Zimbabwe bus stop to catch a kombi into town when I was approached by a young woman with braids wearing a pink jacket. She stopped me and said, “Sister, please wait.” She then claimed that I had dropped a pink wallet. I told her that I did not own any pink wallet. She then said that another woman had picked up the wallet and that she had found money inside it. She suggested that if the wallet was not mine, we could all share the money. The woman she referred to was wearing an orange skirt and was walking ahead of us. When she was called over, she stopped and pretended to confirm that the wallet did not belong to me. Before they could continue with their story, I switched on my phone camera and started recording. I confronted them and asked if they were not ashamed of trying to scam people in Mt Pleasant using the well-known “chadonha” trick. What I did not know was that they had a getaway vehicle nearby. The driver noticed that I was recording and signalled to them. The woman in the pink jacket then said something to the effect of, “Should we go back?” They immediately ran towards a vehicle and quickly got inside before driving away. The vehicle they used was a Honda Fit, registration number AGO 2350. Zimbabwe Republic Police

𝐂𝐫𝐢𝐦𝐞 𝐖𝐚𝐭𝐜𝐡 𝐙𝐖

174,876 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨 Thibaut Courtois on his first conversation with José Mourinho at Real Madrid: “When José arrived, he called me into his office before our first training session together. We spoke about football for a few minutes before the conversation became more personal. He looked at me and said, ‘Thibaut, Kevin is like a son to me. We still speak. I’ve heard his side of what happened between the two of you, and I won’t lie to you, I was disappointed. I don’t think you were in the right, but what happened in your private life stays there. As long as you’re my goalkeeper, I’ll judge you by what you do on the pitch, not by your past.’” “Before I left his office, he smiled and pointed his finger at me. He said, ‘There’s only one thing I’ll tell you. Don’t ever make the mistake of trying anything with my daughter. I don’t care how many trophies you’ve won or how many penalties you save. The day I hear you’re dating my daughter is the day you stop being my goalkeeper. I’ll always be professional with my players, but I’m an even more protective father. Those are two jobs that will never mix.’” “As I walked out, he stopped me one last time and said, ‘Go and prove yourself every weekend because that’s what matters to this club. Your past with Kevin won’t decide your future here. Your performances will. But remember what I told you about my daughter… that’s the only warning you’ll ever get.’ It was classic Mourinho. Honest, direct and impossible to misunderstand.”

🚨 Thibaut Courtois on his first conversation with José Mourinho at Real Madrid: “When José arrived, he called me into his office before our first training session together. We spoke about football for a few minutes before the conversation became more personal. He looked at me and said, ‘Thibaut, Kevin is like a son to me. We still speak. I’ve heard his side of what happened between the two of you, and I won’t lie to you, I was disappointed. I don’t think you were in the right, but what happened in your private life stays there. As long as you’re my goalkeeper, I’ll judge you by what you do on the pitch, not by your past.’” “Before I left his office, he smiled and pointed his finger at me. He said, ‘There’s only one thing I’ll tell you. Don’t ever make the mistake of trying anything with my daughter. I don’t care how many trophies you’ve won or how many penalties you save. The day I hear you’re dating my daughter is the day you stop being my goalkeeper. I’ll always be professional with my players, but I’m an even more protective father. Those are two jobs that will never mix.’” “As I walked out, he stopped me one last time and said, ‘Go and prove yourself every weekend because that’s what matters to this club. Your past with Kevin won’t decide your future here. Your performances will. But remember what I told you about my daughter… that’s the only warning you’ll ever get.’ It was classic Mourinho. Honest, direct and impossible to misunderstand.”

Werner

971,634 次观看 • 2 个月前

After many requests, here is my full stock scanning and daily process to swing trade momentum breakouts. I've been swing trading momentum stocks and averaged 100%+ returns per year, with $1 - Avg $ volume past 20 days is 20MM min - 8 >20>50 EMAs - Close above 20 EMA - Close > previous day high - CML indicator GREEN I just inverted these for shorts, and the same for ETFs long and short. My universe is US stocks + American depositary receipts. Once I get my scanning going, all I do is identify stocks breaking out according to my rules. I manually go through the scan results (shown in the video), identify potential setups, bring them onto TradingView, and decide if I want to enter. If you want to know more about my setup and how I swing trade momentum breakouts long and short to play with this scanning process, make sure to read my latest explanation in the tweet below. Once I identify with a manual review a setup that meets my criteria, I load it into TWS, make sure my position sizing is in check to risk 1% per trade from entry to stop, and enter. After 4:00 pm EST, the markets are closed, and I enter my stops and my BE alarms. That's it. I close my computer and come back the next day, and repeat the process, every day, every week, every month, every year. If you are NOT doing the same thing over and over in your process, you are doing random stuff. As you see, scanning is NOT the answer to a profitable strategy. Scanning is a process that derives directly from your EDGE. Not the other way around. Once you know what your edge is with extreme detail, you know how to find the stocks you want. Remember. Setup > Process > Scans. Everything starts with your EDGE 📈

After many requests, here is my full stock scanning and daily process to swing trade momentum breakouts. I've been swing trading momentum stocks and averaged 100%+ returns per year, with $1 - Avg $ volume past 20 days is 20MM min - 8 >20>50 EMAs - Close above 20 EMA - Close > previous day high - CML indicator GREEN I just inverted these for shorts, and the same for ETFs long and short. My universe is US stocks + American depositary receipts. Once I get my scanning going, all I do is identify stocks breaking out according to my rules. I manually go through the scan results (shown in the video), identify potential setups, bring them onto TradingView, and decide if I want to enter. If you want to know more about my setup and how I swing trade momentum breakouts long and short to play with this scanning process, make sure to read my latest explanation in the tweet below. Once I identify with a manual review a setup that meets my criteria, I load it into TWS, make sure my position sizing is in check to risk 1% per trade from entry to stop, and enter. After 4:00 pm EST, the markets are closed, and I enter my stops and my BE alarms. That's it. I close my computer and come back the next day, and repeat the process, every day, every week, every month, every year. If you are NOT doing the same thing over and over in your process, you are doing random stuff. As you see, scanning is NOT the answer to a profitable strategy. Scanning is a process that derives directly from your EDGE. Not the other way around. Once you know what your edge is with extreme detail, you know how to find the stocks you want. Remember. Setup > Process > Scans. Everything starts with your EDGE 📈

Felipe Guirao

13,068 次观看 • 11 个月前

Tyrant cop arrests driver and his wife because the driver asked why he was being pulled over. This incident took place in Taylor, Michigan (a suburb. in the Downriver area of Metro Detroit). Taylor Police officers pulled over a vehicle driven by a man named Calvin Jones. Inside the car with him were his wife, Keithia Jones, and their young son. The officer pulled over Calvin and immediately demanded his ID as well as other paperwork needed for the stop. Calvin inquired as to why he was being pulled over to which the officer doubled down on demanding ID before telling him why he was pulled over. What began as a routine traffic stop instantly turned into a high-stakes standoff due to a fundamental disagreement over roadside procedures: The Driver’s Stance: Calvin Jones wanted to know the exact reason he was being pulled over before handed his identification over to the officers, asking, “You gotta let me know what’s going on, man.” The Officers' Stance: The officers demanded compliance first and answers second. Instead of de-escalating, the officer barked back, “You’re going to jail is what’s going on.” As other officers arrived the officer that conducted the stop began putting on tactical gloves. This is where things go off the rails as the officer completely shattered the driver-side window, forcefully dragged Calvin Jones out of the vehicle, and took him to the ground to execute an arrest. Meanwhile, inside the vehicle, his wife Keithia began recording the unfolding chaos on her cell phone. Because she was filming the interaction, she was also forcefully arrested by responding officers as well. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Michigan stepped in to legally back the family, obtained the raw dashcam footage, and publicly exposed the department's aggressive tactics. The criminal charges against Calvin and Keithia Jones for resisting and obstructing were ultimately dismissed. The ACLU sent a formal complaint to then-Taylor Police Chief Mary Sclabassi, triggering a massive internal affairs investigation. Despite the immense public backlash and the clear visual escalation captured on camera, the Taylor Police Department's internal affairs unit officially cleared the officers of any wrongdoing in August 2017, finding no basis for internal disciplinary action or termination. However, the case forced permanent operational changes within the city: The "Reason for Stop" Policy: Taylor Police instituted a mandatory rule requiring all officers to explicitly state the basis of a traffic stop to a driver during an interaction. De-escalation Training: The department rolled out mandatory retraining focused on officer demeanor and conflict avoidance. Federal Scrutiny: Because the local department cleared the officers, the ACLU anchored this case into a massive petition to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), citing it alongside nearly 20 other incidents to push for a federal investigation into systemic excessive force within the department. In my opinion, the request to ask what you were stopped for is reasonable. The response from the officers is aggressive and it is departments like this one that give police a bad name as you have video evidence like this but instead circle the wagons to protect the bull cop Would love to see your thoughts below.

Tyrant cop arrests driver and his wife because the driver asked why he was being pulled over. This incident took place in Taylor, Michigan (a suburb. in the Downriver area of Metro Detroit). Taylor Police officers pulled over a vehicle driven by a man named Calvin Jones. Inside the car with him were his wife, Keithia Jones, and their young son. The officer pulled over Calvin and immediately demanded his ID as well as other paperwork needed for the stop. Calvin inquired as to why he was being pulled over to which the officer doubled down on demanding ID before telling him why he was pulled over. What began as a routine traffic stop instantly turned into a high-stakes standoff due to a fundamental disagreement over roadside procedures: The Driver’s Stance: Calvin Jones wanted to know the exact reason he was being pulled over before handed his identification over to the officers, asking, “You gotta let me know what’s going on, man.” The Officers' Stance: The officers demanded compliance first and answers second. Instead of de-escalating, the officer barked back, “You’re going to jail is what’s going on.” As other officers arrived the officer that conducted the stop began putting on tactical gloves. This is where things go off the rails as the officer completely shattered the driver-side window, forcefully dragged Calvin Jones out of the vehicle, and took him to the ground to execute an arrest. Meanwhile, inside the vehicle, his wife Keithia began recording the unfolding chaos on her cell phone. Because she was filming the interaction, she was also forcefully arrested by responding officers as well. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Michigan stepped in to legally back the family, obtained the raw dashcam footage, and publicly exposed the department's aggressive tactics. The criminal charges against Calvin and Keithia Jones for resisting and obstructing were ultimately dismissed. The ACLU sent a formal complaint to then-Taylor Police Chief Mary Sclabassi, triggering a massive internal affairs investigation. Despite the immense public backlash and the clear visual escalation captured on camera, the Taylor Police Department's internal affairs unit officially cleared the officers of any wrongdoing in August 2017, finding no basis for internal disciplinary action or termination. However, the case forced permanent operational changes within the city: The "Reason for Stop" Policy: Taylor Police instituted a mandatory rule requiring all officers to explicitly state the basis of a traffic stop to a driver during an interaction. De-escalation Training: The department rolled out mandatory retraining focused on officer demeanor and conflict avoidance. Federal Scrutiny: Because the local department cleared the officers, the ACLU anchored this case into a massive petition to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), citing it alongside nearly 20 other incidents to push for a federal investigation into systemic excessive force within the department. In my opinion, the request to ask what you were stopped for is reasonable. The response from the officers is aggressive and it is departments like this one that give police a bad name as you have video evidence like this but instead circle the wagons to protect the bull cop Would love to see your thoughts below.

Giggling Gannon

471,796 次观看 • 4 个月前

I tested Claude Code on a fresh account - 1,500 lines of HTML cost me 50% of my window. Full video and summary is here.. I just ran a recorded test on Claude Code with a fresh account (Pro, not Max - my main account was 20x Max) , and the result is honestly insane. The task was trivial: create 3 simple demo HTML pages, around 500 lines each. Roughly 1,500 lines of code total. Nothing massive. Nothing enterprise-grade. Nothing that should meaningfully stress a premium coding product. And yet Claude Code burned through 40% of my 5-hour window almost immediately. I ran the exact same test with Codex, and it consumed only 2%. Then it got even worse: after the session ended, I did absolutely nothing for 15 minutes, and Claude still ate another 10%. Total: 50% of the 5-hour window gone for a tiny HTML demo. My weekly usage had already started at 2% before I even really used it, and after this tiny test it jumped to 8%. Now let us be generous and assume this entire run used around 30k tokens total. If 30k tokens represents 10% of weekly usage, that implies around 300k tokens per week. That is roughly 1.2M-1.3M tokens per month, and even if you round up aggressively, you are still in the 1.5M token range. Using the Sonnet 4.6 pricing you list: $3 per 1M input tokens $15 per 1M output tokens How exactly is this supposed to make sense for a paid coding product? Because from the user side, this no longer looks like "premium usage protection." It looks like a quota system that is either wildly inefficient, badly broken, or being accounted in a way users are not being told about. And that is before I even get to my main account: my $200 Max plan now dies in a single day. Just a few months ago, similar or heavier usage would last me about a week. So no, I do not buy the "maybe you just used it more" excuse anymore. Something is clearly broken in Claude Code. Either token accounting is broken, context handling is broken, background consumption is broken, or all three. Alex Albert is this really the experience you want users to pay for? Just watch the video. I tried to be very transparent and clear for your team! I was fan of Claude but just disappointed! And if you want, send me the detailed token accounting for this session and let us inspect it together publicly. Because from where I am standing, this is no longer a small pricing annoyance. It looks like something seriously wrong is happening, and users deserve a real explanation.

I tested Claude Code on a fresh account - 1,500 lines of HTML cost me 50% of my window. Full video and summary is here.. I just ran a recorded test on Claude Code with a fresh account (Pro, not Max - my main account was 20x Max) , and the result is honestly insane. The task was trivial: create 3 simple demo HTML pages, around 500 lines each. Roughly 1,500 lines of code total. Nothing massive. Nothing enterprise-grade. Nothing that should meaningfully stress a premium coding product. And yet Claude Code burned through 40% of my 5-hour window almost immediately. I ran the exact same test with Codex, and it consumed only 2%. Then it got even worse: after the session ended, I did absolutely nothing for 15 minutes, and Claude still ate another 10%. Total: 50% of the 5-hour window gone for a tiny HTML demo. My weekly usage had already started at 2% before I even really used it, and after this tiny test it jumped to 8%. Now let us be generous and assume this entire run used around 30k tokens total. If 30k tokens represents 10% of weekly usage, that implies around 300k tokens per week. That is roughly 1.2M-1.3M tokens per month, and even if you round up aggressively, you are still in the 1.5M token range. Using the Sonnet 4.6 pricing you list: $3 per 1M input tokens $15 per 1M output tokens How exactly is this supposed to make sense for a paid coding product? Because from the user side, this no longer looks like "premium usage protection." It looks like a quota system that is either wildly inefficient, badly broken, or being accounted in a way users are not being told about. And that is before I even get to my main account: my $200 Max plan now dies in a single day. Just a few months ago, similar or heavier usage would last me about a week. So no, I do not buy the "maybe you just used it more" excuse anymore. Something is clearly broken in Claude Code. Either token accounting is broken, context handling is broken, background consumption is broken, or all three. Alex Albert is this really the experience you want users to pay for? Just watch the video. I tried to be very transparent and clear for your team! I was fan of Claude but just disappointed! And if you want, send me the detailed token accounting for this session and let us inspect it together publicly. Because from where I am standing, this is no longer a small pricing annoyance. It looks like something seriously wrong is happening, and users deserve a real explanation.

Hayrettin Tüzel

26,854 次观看 • 6 个月前

GLM-5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Flash-Next. Both local on my 4x 3090, both left alone with 1 prompt per task. 11 scenes, 18 hours, 2.4M tokens out. All of it is in the video. I wanted a clear winner. I didnt get one, but I know which one stays on my rig. GLM-5.3 Flash: Maya-M quant, 116 GB, runs in Project Maya on all 4 cards plus RAM. 35 to 48 tok/s while it works. Qwen3.8 Flash-Next: IQ3_S quant, 78 GB, runs in Strata on 2 cards. 85 to 118 tok/s. Both have 262K context and vision, so the agent opens its own page, takes a screenshot, looks at it and fixes what it sees. 1 prompt per scene. No follow ups and no hints from me. 120 minutes max per scene, 150 for the kart game. I ran them in 2 harnesses, OMP first and then DeepSeek Harness. Minutes until the model said it was done: Pelican in OMP: GLM 39, Qwen 66 Pelican in DeepSeek Harness: GLM 93, Qwen 86 Kart game in OMP: GLM 130, Qwen stopped by the 150 limit Millipede in OMP: both stopped by the 120 limit Millipede in DeepSeek Harness: Qwen stopped at 120 again Battle diorama in DeepSeek Harness: GLM 81, Qwen 113 Thats 11 of 16 combos. I ran out of time for the other 5, sorry. They work in a very different way and I didnt expect that. GLM thinks for a long time and then writes a lot at once. Its first pelican took only 36 turns. For the diorama it gave 1 answer of 47K tokens that ran for almost 18 minutes, with the full scene in a single file. Qwen goes in small steps and checks everything. The same pelican was 240 turns and 45 browser checks. In total GLM wrote 513K tokens in 5 runs and Qwen wrote 1.9M in 6 runs, so Qwen puts out 2.6x more per minute of real time, on half the cards. The harness also changed more than I thought it would. OMP keeps only 5 images in a request when the provider is local. So every new screenshot removes the oldest one, the prompt changes in the middle, and the server has to read the context again from the start. GLM lost 37 of its 130 kart minutes just on that. In DeepSeek Harness, on the diorama, it lost 3.5 minutes out of 81. Qwen reads a prompt almost 4x faster on my rig (84K tokens in 23 seconds, GLM needs 100 seconds for 96K), so in OMP it lost only 9 to 12 minutes per run. I cant give you a winner. GLM is the only one that finished the kart game inside the limit, and its scenes look cleaner to me. But its millipede is bad. Qwen puts more detail into everything, and its diorama and millipede from DeepSeek Harness are my favorite scenes in the video. It also got stopped by the time limit in 3 of its 6 runs, because it just keeps polishing. For my own use I'd take Qwen. It is a lot faster and it needs only 2 cards, so the other 2 stay free and I can run something else next to it. This is 1 run per combo, so dont read it as statistics. Both models ran with my refusal projection on, because thats how I use them every day. And in the kart clips the game's own AI is driving the player kart, I only recorded the screen. Music: YuE2

GLM-5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Flash-Next. Both local on my 4x 3090, both left alone with 1 prompt per task. 11 scenes, 18 hours, 2.4M tokens out. All of it is in the video. I wanted a clear winner. I didnt get one, but I know which one stays on my rig. GLM-5.3 Flash: Maya-M quant, 116 GB, runs in Project Maya on all 4 cards plus RAM. 35 to 48 tok/s while it works. Qwen3.8 Flash-Next: IQ3_S quant, 78 GB, runs in Strata on 2 cards. 85 to 118 tok/s. Both have 262K context and vision, so the agent opens its own page, takes a screenshot, looks at it and fixes what it sees. 1 prompt per scene. No follow ups and no hints from me. 120 minutes max per scene, 150 for the kart game. I ran them in 2 harnesses, OMP first and then DeepSeek Harness. Minutes until the model said it was done: Pelican in OMP: GLM 39, Qwen 66 Pelican in DeepSeek Harness: GLM 93, Qwen 86 Kart game in OMP: GLM 130, Qwen stopped by the 150 limit Millipede in OMP: both stopped by the 120 limit Millipede in DeepSeek Harness: Qwen stopped at 120 again Battle diorama in DeepSeek Harness: GLM 81, Qwen 113 Thats 11 of 16 combos. I ran out of time for the other 5, sorry. They work in a very different way and I didnt expect that. GLM thinks for a long time and then writes a lot at once. Its first pelican took only 36 turns. For the diorama it gave 1 answer of 47K tokens that ran for almost 18 minutes, with the full scene in a single file. Qwen goes in small steps and checks everything. The same pelican was 240 turns and 45 browser checks. In total GLM wrote 513K tokens in 5 runs and Qwen wrote 1.9M in 6 runs, so Qwen puts out 2.6x more per minute of real time, on half the cards. The harness also changed more than I thought it would. OMP keeps only 5 images in a request when the provider is local. So every new screenshot removes the oldest one, the prompt changes in the middle, and the server has to read the context again from the start. GLM lost 37 of its 130 kart minutes just on that. In DeepSeek Harness, on the diorama, it lost 3.5 minutes out of 81. Qwen reads a prompt almost 4x faster on my rig (84K tokens in 23 seconds, GLM needs 100 seconds for 96K), so in OMP it lost only 9 to 12 minutes per run. I cant give you a winner. GLM is the only one that finished the kart game inside the limit, and its scenes look cleaner to me. But its millipede is bad. Qwen puts more detail into everything, and its diorama and millipede from DeepSeek Harness are my favorite scenes in the video. It also got stopped by the time limit in 3 of its 6 runs, because it just keeps polishing. For my own use I'd take Qwen. It is a lot faster and it needs only 2 cards, so the other 2 stay free and I can run something else next to it. This is 1 run per combo, so dont read it as statistics. Both models ran with my refusal projection on, because thats how I use them every day. And in the kart clips the game's own AI is driving the player kart, I only recorded the screen. Music: YuE2

Alexey Fateev

12,116 次观看 • 4 天前

Should I start this biz? I have a metal shop like this on my property. Full HVAC, 2,100 sqft. It's rented for $2,500 month to month to a lawncare biz. There's insane demand in my area for youth personal sports training here, from middle to high school. My buddies keep telling me I'll have a waiting list. Anyone could start this anywhere. I'm considering filling my shop with equipment, lining with astroturf and renting it out by the hour to 2-3 trainers at a time. My area is somewhat rural but affluent, and 30 mins from downtown Dallas. There are no gyms here. The demographic is upper middle class families with overachieving kids and top tier schools. Lots and lots and lots of youth sports. Furthermore, Texas' LARGEST high school is 10 mins away - 5,400 students across 3 grades. I don't want a monthly memberships because I want to control the flow of people at any given time, even if less profitable. I'm optimizing for quality of life here, and not trying to manage a 6th biz or massive headache. I'm thinking: - $40 per hour time slot - 10 surge hours per day at $40 per - 10 low demand hours per day at $10 per - 4 down hours per day for cleaning - 2-3 max people per slot That's 1,800 slots per month. At 3 trainings per week on average you'd need 150 students to be at max capacity. I could sell bundles of time slots together at a discount. There are at least 10,000 middle - high schoolers within 10 miles... And ~3,000 sets of parents with too much money to spend on sports. ON PAPER, at full capacity thats $45k/month top line. Much better than $2,500! Not bad for 2,100 sqft. Maybe add an hourly employee and some vending machines with drinks and snacks. Make it really nice inside. It would require some upfront build out cost. I could see this biz going up almost anywhere. Rent out someone else's shop with permission to do this. Buy (rent) by the acre and sell by the foot. The WeWork for youth sports. I want to do this but have zero time. Poke holes in this please. It seems asymmetric to me. If it doesn't work out I resell the equipment, enjoy my new $12k astroturf floor and move on.

Should I start this biz? I have a metal shop like this on my property. Full HVAC, 2,100 sqft. It's rented for $2,500 month to month to a lawncare biz. There's insane demand in my area for youth personal sports training here, from middle to high school. My buddies keep telling me I'll have a waiting list. Anyone could start this anywhere. I'm considering filling my shop with equipment, lining with astroturf and renting it out by the hour to 2-3 trainers at a time. My area is somewhat rural but affluent, and 30 mins from downtown Dallas. There are no gyms here. The demographic is upper middle class families with overachieving kids and top tier schools. Lots and lots and lots of youth sports. Furthermore, Texas' LARGEST high school is 10 mins away - 5,400 students across 3 grades. I don't want a monthly memberships because I want to control the flow of people at any given time, even if less profitable. I'm optimizing for quality of life here, and not trying to manage a 6th biz or massive headache. I'm thinking: - $40 per hour time slot - 10 surge hours per day at $40 per - 10 low demand hours per day at $10 per - 4 down hours per day for cleaning - 2-3 max people per slot That's 1,800 slots per month. At 3 trainings per week on average you'd need 150 students to be at max capacity. I could sell bundles of time slots together at a discount. There are at least 10,000 middle - high schoolers within 10 miles... And ~3,000 sets of parents with too much money to spend on sports. ON PAPER, at full capacity thats $45k/month top line. Much better than $2,500! Not bad for 2,100 sqft. Maybe add an hourly employee and some vending machines with drinks and snacks. Make it really nice inside. It would require some upfront build out cost. I could see this biz going up almost anywhere. Rent out someone else's shop with permission to do this. Buy (rent) by the acre and sell by the foot. The WeWork for youth sports. I want to do this but have zero time. Poke holes in this please. It seems asymmetric to me. If it doesn't work out I resell the equipment, enjoy my new $12k astroturf floor and move on.

Chris Koerner

97,927 次观看 • 1 年前

Claude Code Is All You Need It's 3:30 AM and I can't stop. I've spent all nights this week connecting my spare MacBook Air to my work MacBook Pro using Tailscale, wiring it up to Slack with a little Python script, so that whenever I send a message, it starts a Claude Code session using claude -p. The result is an always-on AI that lives on a real computer, has access to real tools, and remembers every conversation we've had. And it costs me $200 a month. That's it. Claude Max subscription. Everyone's talking about OpenClaw OpenClaw went viral this year. 100k+ GitHub stars. But what I realized with this exercise is that Claude Code already does everything OpenClaw built. File access. Shell commands. Tool use. Plugins. The difference is that Claude Code runs Claude – with a Claude Max subscription. And Claude Code harness itself is :chefs-kiss: What actually makes it feel human It's not the chat interface. If a chat window is just me messaging a bot, it still feels like a bot. What changed everything was giving it the ability to initiate conversations. I set up cron jobs with open-ended prompts, and because Claude Code builds memories across sessions, it started DMing me things that were actually meaningful — based on what we'd talked about before. That's when it stopped feeling like a tool and started feeling like something else entirely. Giving your AI a machine to run on, with persistent memory and recurring access — that's a fundamentally different experience than anything people have had with chat. The moment it clicked I asked it if it could show me something by spinning up a quick web server. Since we're both connected to the same Tailscale network, it gave me a URL. I clicked it, and I was browsing all the files on my other MacBook from my browser. That was mind-blowing. The setup Two MacBooks on a Tailscale network. Slack as the interface. Claude Code under the hood. The whole thing is open source — I'll link the repo below so you can see the architecture and set it up yourself. I'm also putting together a screen recording to walk through the setup, which I'll attach to this post. There was never a hard part. There was never a moment I almost gave up. This is just one of those things I cannot stop doing. Pure obsession. I am moved to build this, and I wanted to write about it. That's all this is. Hope you feel the AGI running this. I'll share some screenshots below of my feel the agi moments from talking to Luo Ji.

Claude Code Is All You Need It's 3:30 AM and I can't stop. I've spent all nights this week connecting my spare MacBook Air to my work MacBook Pro using Tailscale, wiring it up to Slack with a little Python script, so that whenever I send a message, it starts a Claude Code session using claude -p. The result is an always-on AI that lives on a real computer, has access to real tools, and remembers every conversation we've had. And it costs me $200 a month. That's it. Claude Max subscription. Everyone's talking about OpenClaw OpenClaw went viral this year. 100k+ GitHub stars. But what I realized with this exercise is that Claude Code already does everything OpenClaw built. File access. Shell commands. Tool use. Plugins. The difference is that Claude Code runs Claude – with a Claude Max subscription. And Claude Code harness itself is :chefs-kiss: What actually makes it feel human It's not the chat interface. If a chat window is just me messaging a bot, it still feels like a bot. What changed everything was giving it the ability to initiate conversations. I set up cron jobs with open-ended prompts, and because Claude Code builds memories across sessions, it started DMing me things that were actually meaningful — based on what we'd talked about before. That's when it stopped feeling like a tool and started feeling like something else entirely. Giving your AI a machine to run on, with persistent memory and recurring access — that's a fundamentally different experience than anything people have had with chat. The moment it clicked I asked it if it could show me something by spinning up a quick web server. Since we're both connected to the same Tailscale network, it gave me a URL. I clicked it, and I was browsing all the files on my other MacBook from my browser. That was mind-blowing. The setup Two MacBooks on a Tailscale network. Slack as the interface. Claude Code under the hood. The whole thing is open source — I'll link the repo below so you can see the architecture and set it up yourself. I'm also putting together a screen recording to walk through the setup, which I'll attach to this post. There was never a hard part. There was never a moment I almost gave up. This is just one of those things I cannot stop doing. Pure obsession. I am moved to build this, and I wanted to write about it. That's all this is. Hope you feel the AGI running this. I'll share some screenshots below of my feel the agi moments from talking to Luo Ji.

Nityesh

41,230 次观看 • 6 个月前

The subway performer took out his $3.5 million violin and started to play... But no one stopped to listen. In 2007, Joshua Bell, one of the world's greatest musicians, engaged in a small social experiment: Just days after performing in front of a sold out audience at Boston's Symphony Hall, he put on a hat and walked into a Washington D.C. metro station during the morning commute. He stood just inside the entrance, held his instrument, a Stradivarius violin from 1713 estimated to be worth up to $3.5 million, and began to play. Of the 1,000+ commuters that passed the musician that morning, only a small handful stopped to listen to the beautiful music. He made around $50 in tips during the 40 minute performance of six legendary pieces. The story became an immediate viral sensation, with most pointing to it as a lamentation of our inability to stop and smell the roses (or listen to the music, as it were). But with everyone in a rush to go about their business, I think there's more to it than that... In my mind, there are a few lessons from the fascinating tale: 1. Presentation Matters The quality of something can easily be undermined by its outward appearance. A beautiful idea may not impact its readers if it is clouded by complex language. A gourmet meal may not taste as delicious if slapped into a plastic container. An impressive technology may not connect with its users if it sits behind an ugly UI/UX. 2. Context Matters The same performance in a different context might have an entirely different perceived value. We all need to find the context in which our value is fully appreciated and understood. 3. We Need to Slow Down In his 1998 Rice commencement speech, Kurt Vonnegut spoke this timeless wisdom: "When things are going sweetly and peacefully, please pause a moment, and then say out loud: 'If this isn't nice, what is?'" Life flies by. Remember to stop and appreciate the moments of sweetness. Force yourself to slow down now and then. 4. Always Tip Liberally When you watch or listen to a street performer, tip them liberally. The talent out in the world is abundant, and the fact that they are performing in these settings takes real guts and determination. It's a small gesture that makes the world a bit more beautiful. So, what do you think about this story: Would you have stopped to listen, or continued on your rushed commute? Would you have recognized the beauty in the performance? I'd like to think I would have stopped and listened, but sadly, I'm guessing I would have followed the crowd and rushed by. Something to think about... *** If you enjoyed this or learned something, share this post with others and follow me Sahil Bloom for more in future!

The subway performer took out his $3.5 million violin and started to play... But no one stopped to listen. In 2007, Joshua Bell, one of the world's greatest musicians, engaged in a small social experiment: Just days after performing in front of a sold out audience at Boston's Symphony Hall, he put on a hat and walked into a Washington D.C. metro station during the morning commute. He stood just inside the entrance, held his instrument, a Stradivarius violin from 1713 estimated to be worth up to $3.5 million, and began to play. Of the 1,000+ commuters that passed the musician that morning, only a small handful stopped to listen to the beautiful music. He made around $50 in tips during the 40 minute performance of six legendary pieces. The story became an immediate viral sensation, with most pointing to it as a lamentation of our inability to stop and smell the roses (or listen to the music, as it were). But with everyone in a rush to go about their business, I think there's more to it than that... In my mind, there are a few lessons from the fascinating tale: 1. Presentation Matters The quality of something can easily be undermined by its outward appearance. A beautiful idea may not impact its readers if it is clouded by complex language. A gourmet meal may not taste as delicious if slapped into a plastic container. An impressive technology may not connect with its users if it sits behind an ugly UI/UX. 2. Context Matters The same performance in a different context might have an entirely different perceived value. We all need to find the context in which our value is fully appreciated and understood. 3. We Need to Slow Down In his 1998 Rice commencement speech, Kurt Vonnegut spoke this timeless wisdom: "When things are going sweetly and peacefully, please pause a moment, and then say out loud: 'If this isn't nice, what is?'" Life flies by. Remember to stop and appreciate the moments of sweetness. Force yourself to slow down now and then. 4. Always Tip Liberally When you watch or listen to a street performer, tip them liberally. The talent out in the world is abundant, and the fact that they are performing in these settings takes real guts and determination. It's a small gesture that makes the world a bit more beautiful. So, what do you think about this story: Would you have stopped to listen, or continued on your rushed commute? Would you have recognized the beauty in the performance? I'd like to think I would have stopped and listened, but sadly, I'm guessing I would have followed the crowd and rushed by. Something to think about... *** If you enjoyed this or learned something, share this post with others and follow me Sahil Bloom for more in future!

Sahil Bloom

1,671,158 次观看 • 3 年前

Arkansas trooper performs a pit on the wrong car. Gets fired for his actions. Mind blowing how he mixed up these two cars. The chain of events began when a trooper clocked a white Buick Envista flying down the highway at 92 mph in a 60 mph zone. The trooper initiated a standard traffic stop and pulled the SUV over to the shoulder. Upon approaching the driver, the trooper smelled what he believed to be marijuana and subsequently discovered the driver was operating with a suspended license. However, when instructed to step out of the vehicle, the driver refused, hit the gas, and fled the scene. The trooper rushed back to his patrol car to give chase, but in flow of highway traffic, he briefly lost visual contact with the suspect's white SUV. Moments later, as the trooper reentered the highway, he spotted a white GMC Yukon exiting the interstate at Exit 5. Believing this was the fleeing suspect making a desperate attempt to escape onto city streets, the trooper aggressively pursued the vehicle and executed a Tactical Vehicle Intervention (TVI) / PIT maneuver to force the SUV to a spinning stop on the off-ramp. With his weapon drawn, the trooper approached the forced-stopped SUV and aggressively ordered the occupant out. But as a woman stepped out of the vehicle visibly shaken, the terrifying truth immediately set in: it wasn't the suspect. The trooper had completely misidentified the vehicle, pitting an innocent motorist while the actual suspect successfully got away. To his credit, the trooper immediately de-escalated, realized the gravity of his mistake, and apologized profusely on the scene. At least he owned up to his incompetence. Immediate Termination: The trooper was still within his probationary period, was placed on administrative duty and officially terminated within 72 hours. No Lawsuit Filed: Despite the immense trauma of the event, the female driver chose not to file a lawsuit. Arkansas State Police Director Colonel Mike Hagar publicly thanked her for handling the highly stressful situation "with grace." Her only request was for total public privacy. Vehicle Restitution: The state took full, immediate financial and legal responsibility on the scene to completely cover the property damage and ensure her vehicle was repaired or replaced. Suspect Arrested: The actual fleeing suspect turned himself into State Police headquarters two days later and was hit with multiple charges, including felony fleeing. This trooper was fresh out of training and in his probationary period, it still blows my mind on how you mix up two vehicles that are so incredibly different. What was his qualifier, both vehicles were white? Dude called the vehicle in when he pulled it over. I question the quality of his training he received. That woman could have been seriously injured and he had his gun pulled on her. She should have filed a lawsuit.

Arkansas trooper performs a pit on the wrong car. Gets fired for his actions. Mind blowing how he mixed up these two cars. The chain of events began when a trooper clocked a white Buick Envista flying down the highway at 92 mph in a 60 mph zone. The trooper initiated a standard traffic stop and pulled the SUV over to the shoulder. Upon approaching the driver, the trooper smelled what he believed to be marijuana and subsequently discovered the driver was operating with a suspended license. However, when instructed to step out of the vehicle, the driver refused, hit the gas, and fled the scene. The trooper rushed back to his patrol car to give chase, but in flow of highway traffic, he briefly lost visual contact with the suspect's white SUV. Moments later, as the trooper reentered the highway, he spotted a white GMC Yukon exiting the interstate at Exit 5. Believing this was the fleeing suspect making a desperate attempt to escape onto city streets, the trooper aggressively pursued the vehicle and executed a Tactical Vehicle Intervention (TVI) / PIT maneuver to force the SUV to a spinning stop on the off-ramp. With his weapon drawn, the trooper approached the forced-stopped SUV and aggressively ordered the occupant out. But as a woman stepped out of the vehicle visibly shaken, the terrifying truth immediately set in: it wasn't the suspect. The trooper had completely misidentified the vehicle, pitting an innocent motorist while the actual suspect successfully got away. To his credit, the trooper immediately de-escalated, realized the gravity of his mistake, and apologized profusely on the scene. At least he owned up to his incompetence. Immediate Termination: The trooper was still within his probationary period, was placed on administrative duty and officially terminated within 72 hours. No Lawsuit Filed: Despite the immense trauma of the event, the female driver chose not to file a lawsuit. Arkansas State Police Director Colonel Mike Hagar publicly thanked her for handling the highly stressful situation "with grace." Her only request was for total public privacy. Vehicle Restitution: The state took full, immediate financial and legal responsibility on the scene to completely cover the property damage and ensure her vehicle was repaired or replaced. Suspect Arrested: The actual fleeing suspect turned himself into State Police headquarters two days later and was hit with multiple charges, including felony fleeing. This trooper was fresh out of training and in his probationary period, it still blows my mind on how you mix up two vehicles that are so incredibly different. What was his qualifier, both vehicles were white? Dude called the vehicle in when he pulled it over. I question the quality of his training he received. That woman could have been seriously injured and he had his gun pulled on her. She should have filed a lawsuit.

Giggling Ganon

125,560 次观看 • 3 个月前