正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Transshipment matters because it lets foreign producers dodge tariffs by routing goods through third countries, undercutting American manufacturers that play by the rules. Tariffs level the playing field; transshipment tilts it back. We’re shutting that back door—for good.

Peter Navarro

388,930 subscribers

96,089 次观看 • 17 天前 •via X (Twitter)

教育新闻政治财经

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Back in 2018, we put historic tariffs on China to protect American workers. Almost immediately, China started looking for ways around them. One of those ways? Transshipment. The crudest form of transshipment is pretty simple: a high-tariff country like China ships its goods through a third country, swaps the label, and sends them into America at a lower tariff rate.

Back in 2018, we put historic tariffs on China to protect American workers. Almost immediately, China started looking for ways around them. One of those ways? Transshipment. The crudest form of transshipment is pretty simple: a high-tariff country like China ships its goods through a third country, swaps the label, and sends them into America at a lower tariff rate.

Peter Navarro

33,320 次观看 • 21 天前

Breakenridge: "The premise here is laughable that by Canada retaliating to American tariffs, that we're somehow acting unfairly and discriminating against American goods. So it's fair when the Americans do it. It's unfair when other countries respond in kind."

Breakenridge: "The premise here is laughable that by Canada retaliating to American tariffs, that we're somehow acting unfairly and discriminating against American goods. So it's fair when the Americans do it. It's unfair when other countries respond in kind."

Scott Robertson

33,837 次观看 • 1 个月前

President Trump is asking for one thing regarding tariffs: A level playing field. All that has to happen to resolve this is for foreign leaders to lower the tariffs imposed on the United States!

President Trump is asking for one thing regarding tariffs: A level playing field. All that has to happen to resolve this is for foreign leaders to lower the tariffs imposed on the United States!

Stephen Moore

144,559 次观看 • 1 年前

Trump's Tariffs are a Misguided Solution Trump argues that the world is screwing the US with unfair trade practices and that tariffs will level the playing field. But the truth is our trade deficits aren’t because of foreign cheating, they’re because of our uncompetitive economy

Trump's Tariffs are a Misguided Solution Trump argues that the world is screwing the US with unfair trade practices and that tariffs will level the playing field. But the truth is our trade deficits aren’t because of foreign cheating, they’re because of our uncompetitive economy

Peter Schiff

80,062 次观看 • 1 年前

PRESIDENT TRUMP speaks ahead of Iowa speech: "Just recently we gave the farmers $12 billion dollars because they were treated unfairly by foreign countries... you know where I got it, tariffs, I got it from the tariffs."

PRESIDENT TRUMP speaks ahead of Iowa speech: "Just recently we gave the farmers $12 billion dollars because they were treated unfairly by foreign countries... you know where I got it, tariffs, I got it from the tariffs."

Fox News

181,182 次观看 • 7 个月前

🚨 NOW: President Trump is slapping TARIFFS across a SWATH of 60 countries effective tonight at midnight because of forced labor use The Supreme Court struck his previous ones down, but TARIFFS ARE BACK! 🔥 DOOCY: "Lets them punish countries that are using forced labor 60 countries that import 99% of goods to this country, dealing with 10%-12.5% tariff at midnight."

🚨 NOW: President Trump is slapping TARIFFS across a SWATH of 60 countries effective tonight at midnight because of forced labor use The Supreme Court struck his previous ones down, but TARIFFS ARE BACK! 🔥 DOOCY: "Lets them punish countries that are using forced labor 60 countries that import 99% of goods to this country, dealing with 10%-12.5% tariff at midnight."

Eric Daugherty

145,852 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨NEW: Elon Musk on President Donald Trump: "I think President Trump likes to get things done, and he's not looking to punish countries or do things that are economically insane, but he does view tariffs as a means to gain cooperation of countries for important matters. So and obviously, if countries have implemented asymmetric tariffs without taxing the import of American goods, while America does not tax the import of their goods, then we have an imbalance. He's simply looking for a fair and level playing field."

🚨NEW: Elon Musk on President Donald Trump: "I think President Trump likes to get things done, and he's not looking to punish countries or do things that are economically insane, but he does view tariffs as a means to gain cooperation of countries for important matters. So and obviously, if countries have implemented asymmetric tariffs without taxing the import of American goods, while America does not tax the import of their goods, then we have an imbalance. He's simply looking for a fair and level playing field."

DogeDesigner

274,892 次观看 • 1 年前

GREER: I don't concede that the tariffs went through to consumers WHITEHOUSE: If it fact it's not paid by the American side, it would make no sense to be making refunds. So your behavior with tariff refunds provides the point that tariffs aren't just paid by foreigners

GREER: I don't concede that the tariffs went through to consumers WHITEHOUSE: If it fact it's not paid by the American side, it would make no sense to be making refunds. So your behavior with tariff refunds provides the point that tariffs aren't just paid by foreigners

Aaron Rupar

239,794 次观看 • 1 个月前

Fox Anchor Brett Baier: President Trump insists U.S. manufacturers will be protected because tariffs will be paid by these countries. But, it's not quite that simple. The companies responsible for importing a product are the ones who physically pay tariffs.. They are usually US companies

Fox Anchor Brett Baier: President Trump insists U.S. manufacturers will be protected because tariffs will be paid by these countries. But, it's not quite that simple. The companies responsible for importing a product are the ones who physically pay tariffs.. They are usually US companies

Acyn

4,303,944 次观看 • 1 年前

Sen. Tina Smith: Is it your perspective that tariffs are not contributing to inflation? Trump nominee: I do believe that tariffs generally cause prices of some goods to go up relative to other goods Smith: The tariffs implemented raised spending amounts by 3.1%. That would argue that tariffs are contributing to price increases. Nominee: I think it's too early to tell exactly what the effects of tariffs are.

Sen. Tina Smith: Is it your perspective that tariffs are not contributing to inflation? Trump nominee: I do believe that tariffs generally cause prices of some goods to go up relative to other goods Smith: The tariffs implemented raised spending amounts by 3.1%. That would argue that tariffs are contributing to price increases. Nominee: I think it's too early to tell exactly what the effects of tariffs are.

Headquarters

62,991 次观看 • 2 个月前

Greer on tariffs: "You have Democrats saying 'strike this down and give the money back to all the corporations who are importing foreign goods made by foreign workers in foreign countries.' It's totally topsy turvy. I don't know why they want to give money back to all these companies."

Greer on tariffs: "You have Democrats saying 'strike this down and give the money back to all the corporations who are importing foreign goods made by foreign workers in foreign countries.' It's totally topsy turvy. I don't know why they want to give money back to all these companies."

Aaron Rupar

41,891 次观看 • 5 个月前

Trump claims tariffs will make America rich again, but that’s not how it works. Tariffs aren’t paid by other countries—they’re paid by Americans. It’s not a tax on countries like China; it’s a tax on the stuff we buy. Here’s how it works: when the government puts a tariff on something, it raises the price of that product. The idea is to make imported goods more expensive so people buy American-made products instead. Sounds good, right? The problem is, most things we use in the U.S. are made overseas, and it would take years—or even decades—to make them here. And in some cases, it might never happen because it costs too much to produce those goods locally. For example, if something costs $50 and a tariff adds $5, the new price is $55. That extra cost comes out of your pocket. This can cause inflation, making everything more expensive, and people either stop buying or have to spend more because there are no cheaper options. So, who gets the money from tariffs? The U.S. government collects it, but it’s not paid by China or any other country. It’s paid by you—the American consumer. The U.S. can’t tax other countries directly, so the burden falls on taxpayers here. Tariffs can work if the product being taxed is already made in the U.S. For example, if China floods the market with super-cheap goods that hurt local manufacturers, tariffs can make those imports more expensive, giving American businesses a chance to compete. But slapping tariffs on goods we don’t make here—or won’t make for years—just makes things more expensive for everyone. That’s why no president has wanted to be known as a "tariff president." They knew tariffs are really just taxes on Americans and can backfire politically. If tariffs drive up prices and hurt voters’ wallets, it could mean big trouble in the next election. Republicans might certainly lose in 2026.

Trump claims tariffs will make America rich again, but that’s not how it works. Tariffs aren’t paid by other countries—they’re paid by Americans. It’s not a tax on countries like China; it’s a tax on the stuff we buy. Here’s how it works: when the government puts a tariff on something, it raises the price of that product. The idea is to make imported goods more expensive so people buy American-made products instead. Sounds good, right? The problem is, most things we use in the U.S. are made overseas, and it would take years—or even decades—to make them here. And in some cases, it might never happen because it costs too much to produce those goods locally. For example, if something costs $50 and a tariff adds $5, the new price is $55. That extra cost comes out of your pocket. This can cause inflation, making everything more expensive, and people either stop buying or have to spend more because there are no cheaper options. So, who gets the money from tariffs? The U.S. government collects it, but it’s not paid by China or any other country. It’s paid by you—the American consumer. The U.S. can’t tax other countries directly, so the burden falls on taxpayers here. Tariffs can work if the product being taxed is already made in the U.S. For example, if China floods the market with super-cheap goods that hurt local manufacturers, tariffs can make those imports more expensive, giving American businesses a chance to compete. But slapping tariffs on goods we don’t make here—or won’t make for years—just makes things more expensive for everyone. That’s why no president has wanted to be known as a "tariff president." They knew tariffs are really just taxes on Americans and can backfire politically. If tariffs drive up prices and hurt voters’ wallets, it could mean big trouble in the next election. Republicans might certainly lose in 2026.

Simon Ateba

50,090 次观看 • 1 年前

In 2018, the US placed tariffs on imported washing machines to protect American manufacturers. 1,800 new jobs were created at a cost of $1.5 billion a year to consumers, roughly $820,000 per job. And the tariffs even drove up the price of dryers that weren’t taxed at all. Wealth was not created, tariffs moved money from millions of households to a small protected industry while making the whole economy smaller. David Ricardo explained in 1817 that even if one country could make every single product better and cheaper than anyone else, it would still get richer by trading with worse producers because what matters is who gives up the least by making it instead of something else.

In 2018, the US placed tariffs on imported washing machines to protect American manufacturers. 1,800 new jobs were created at a cost of $1.5 billion a year to consumers, roughly $820,000 per job. And the tariffs even drove up the price of dryers that weren’t taxed at all. Wealth was not created, tariffs moved money from millions of households to a small protected industry while making the whole economy smaller. David Ricardo explained in 1817 that even if one country could make every single product better and cheaper than anyone else, it would still get richer by trading with worse producers because what matters is who gives up the least by making it instead of something else.

Rothmus 🏴

26,031 次观看 • 17 天前

PETER NAVARRO: We have two lines of attack from the Wall Street Journal, the legacy media, and the Democrats. The first is that tariffs cause inflation, and by now we've beaten that back because the data just doesn't show it at all. The second is that tariffs somehow harm manufacturing rather than help it. That's just BS. Peter Navarro

PETER NAVARRO: We have two lines of attack from the Wall Street Journal, the legacy media, and the Democrats. The first is that tariffs cause inflation, and by now we've beaten that back because the data just doesn't show it at all. The second is that tariffs somehow harm manufacturing rather than help it. That's just BS. Peter Navarro

Bannon’s WarRoom

11,318 次观看 • 6 个月前

WATCH: Reporter: “Target received a $1B refund for the tariffs… What does it say about the amount of Chinese-made goods and foreign-made goods that our retailers are still selling in the United States?” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent: “What it says is that the Democrat attorneys general who filed a ridiculous lawsuit against this administration wanted the money to go back to the payer of record. That is corporate welfare. The American people HAD THAT MONEY!” "If I hear another Democrat legislator make the inane remark ‘The American people should get the money.’ The American people HAD the money, in the U.S. Treasury, and were FORCED to GIVE it back but using the 301 [tariffs]… We will get that tariff income back, but what you are seeing is that we don't know the discount that Target got from the Chinese suppliers.” “This is a corporate bonanza — which I said it would be at the time.”

WATCH: Reporter: “Target received a $1B refund for the tariffs… What does it say about the amount of Chinese-made goods and foreign-made goods that our retailers are still selling in the United States?” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent: “What it says is that the Democrat attorneys general who filed a ridiculous lawsuit against this administration wanted the money to go back to the payer of record. That is corporate welfare. The American people HAD THAT MONEY!” "If I hear another Democrat legislator make the inane remark ‘The American people should get the money.’ The American people HAD the money, in the U.S. Treasury, and were FORCED to GIVE it back but using the 301 [tariffs]… We will get that tariff income back, but what you are seeing is that we don't know the discount that Target got from the Chinese suppliers.” “This is a corporate bonanza — which I said it would be at the time.”

RedWave Press

36,781 次观看 • 14 天前