Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Trinamool’s publicity stunt ‘Sebashray’ in Diamond Harbour stands completely exposed! Unverified, blank test reports from Diamond Harbour Govt. Medical College were found strewn around, lacking doctor signatures or registration numbers.

BJP4Bengal's profile picture

BJP West Bengal

507,173 subscribers

17,058 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

মানুষের মর্যাদা সবচেয়ে বড় সত্য। The Constitution speaks of dignity as a right, not a favour. As we move ahead from Republic Day, that principle guided today’s work, ensuring that care remains organised, accessible, and uninterrupted for people across Diamond Harbour. With Mega Camps held simultaneously in all seven Assembly Constituencies, people were able to access consultations, diagnostics, medicines, and referrals without confusion or interruption. This coordination ensured that care did not end at the first step, but moved with people through every stage they required. This approach reflects what Sebaashray stands for. When people enter this system, they are not treated as numbers, but as individuals whose health journey deserves attention, follow-through, and respect. The confidence with which people participated today reinforces why this work matters. That trust carries an obligation, and I remain committed to strengthening Sebaashray as a model of healthcare that is reliable, humane, and firmly grounded in the belief that public service must consistently stand with the people it serves.
1:02

মানুষের মর্যাদা সবচেয়ে বড় সত্য। The Constitution speaks of dignity as a right, not a favour. As we move ahead from Republic Day, that principle guided today’s work, ensuring that care remains organised, accessible, and uninterrupted for people across Diamond Harbour. With Mega Camps held simultaneously in all seven Assembly Constituencies, people were able to access consultations, diagnostics, medicines, and referrals without confusion or interruption. This coordination ensured that care did not end at the first step, but moved with people through every stage they required. This approach reflects what Sebaashray stands for. When people enter this system, they are not treated as numbers, but as individuals whose health journey deserves attention, follow-through, and respect. The confidence with which people participated today reinforces why this work matters. That trust carries an obligation, and I remain committed to strengthening Sebaashray as a model of healthcare that is reliable, humane, and firmly grounded in the belief that public service must consistently stand with the people it serves.

Abhishek Banerjee

200,703 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Diamond Harbour Model The dangerous chaos in Budge Budge at the Indian Oil Corporation Ltd's LPG Bottling Plant is a glaring example of the TMC's syndicate culture spiraling out of control! The ruling party's factions, in their greed to dominate loading-unloading operations, have pushed workers to the edge. Yesterday’s protest, where enraged workers released gas from cylinders onto the streets, could have turned catastrophic. A single spark could have ignited a massive fire, potentially engulfing the entire bottling plant, nearby Budge Budge Institute of Technology (BBIT) College, Jagannath Gupta Institute of Medical Sciences and Hospital, and surrounding areas in a deadly inferno. Lives, property, and livelihoods were at stake due to TMC’s unchecked syndicate raj. This is not governance, it’s a reckless power grab that endangers innocent lives. The people of West Bengal deserve better than a ruling party that thrives on exploitation and chaos. It’s time to dismantle this syndicate culture and restore justice for the workers and safety for our communities.
3:40

Diamond Harbour Model The dangerous chaos in Budge Budge at the Indian Oil Corporation Ltd's LPG Bottling Plant is a glaring example of the TMC's syndicate culture spiraling out of control! The ruling party's factions, in their greed to dominate loading-unloading operations, have pushed workers to the edge. Yesterday’s protest, where enraged workers released gas from cylinders onto the streets, could have turned catastrophic. A single spark could have ignited a massive fire, potentially engulfing the entire bottling plant, nearby Budge Budge Institute of Technology (BBIT) College, Jagannath Gupta Institute of Medical Sciences and Hospital, and surrounding areas in a deadly inferno. Lives, property, and livelihoods were at stake due to TMC’s unchecked syndicate raj. This is not governance, it’s a reckless power grab that endangers innocent lives. The people of West Bengal deserve better than a ruling party that thrives on exploitation and chaos. It’s time to dismantle this syndicate culture and restore justice for the workers and safety for our communities.

Suvendu Adhikari

21,161 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The real story behind the West Bengal building fire: ✅ While most of the discussion is focused on the reported destruction of around 4,000 EVMs, very few are asking a more important question: what else was burnt in that building? ✅ The fire reportedly affected the 3rd, 8th and 9th floors, with initial reports suggesting that it may have started from the 3rd floor. ✅ The West Bengal government has itself reportedly not ruled out the possibility of internal sabotage, which makes the case even more serious. ✅ The 3rd floor reportedly housed the South 24 Parganas Zilla Parishad office, from where Jahangir Khan is said to have operated. ✅ The 8th floor reportedly had offices linked to the School Education Department, Mid-Day Meal records, Horticulture Department, and other departments that have earlier faced allegations of irregularities. ✅ The most sensitive claim is about the 9th floor, where reports suggest that apart from EVMs, there may also have been records linked to the Diamond Harbour election petition, where Abhishek Banerjee won by nearly 7 lakh votes. ✅ But the public narrative has been largely limited to just the EVMs. The bigger question is: were other sensitive files, departmental records, or election-related documents also destroyed and why is there no clear public disclosure yet?
2:56

The real story behind the West Bengal building fire: ✅ While most of the discussion is focused on the reported destruction of around 4,000 EVMs, very few are asking a more important question: what else was burnt in that building? ✅ The fire reportedly affected the 3rd, 8th and 9th floors, with initial reports suggesting that it may have started from the 3rd floor. ✅ The West Bengal government has itself reportedly not ruled out the possibility of internal sabotage, which makes the case even more serious. ✅ The 3rd floor reportedly housed the South 24 Parganas Zilla Parishad office, from where Jahangir Khan is said to have operated. ✅ The 8th floor reportedly had offices linked to the School Education Department, Mid-Day Meal records, Horticulture Department, and other departments that have earlier faced allegations of irregularities. ✅ The most sensitive claim is about the 9th floor, where reports suggest that apart from EVMs, there may also have been records linked to the Diamond Harbour election petition, where Abhishek Banerjee won by nearly 7 lakh votes. ✅ But the public narrative has been largely limited to just the EVMs. The bigger question is: were other sensitive files, departmental records, or election-related documents also destroyed and why is there no clear public disclosure yet?

Praffulgarg

13,049 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Data pulled from the Georgia 2020 Election and 2 other states on election night showed impossible vote spikes all over 136,000 votes for Biden when the consecutive averages all throughout the night ranged from 2,000 votes to 45,124 votes at the highest in Georgia. Vote Spikes in Georgia at 1:34 am: 136,155 vote spike: 84% for Joe Biden. 18,788 vote spike: 98% for Joe Biden. 13,035 vote spike: 77% for Joe Biden. 9,385 vote spike: 100% for Joe Biden. Vote dumps contained an average of 49% for Biden in Georgia. Vote Spike in Michigan at 5:31 am: 141,258 votes for Biden: 94% 5,968 votes for Trump: 4% These similar spikes happened in Georgia at 1:34 am, and in Wisconsin at 3:42 am. Vote Spike in Wisconsin at 3:42 am: 143,379 votes for Biden: 85% 25,163 votes for Trump: 15% These vote spikes all favored Biden in highly abnormal, unrealistic percentages, some 98% to 100% for Biden, indicating fraud. The Secretary of State would not provide exact time stamped data when requested, which is concerning, considering they tell you that it's the most transparent election. This is called a cover up. Moving on, the ballot totes that contained ballots were all supposed to have red security tamper-proof tags on them. Pictures and witnesses exposed 9 ballot totes without these tags on them. These "totes" or "suitcases" are very similar to the ones that were hidden under the tables at the State Farm Arena incident where ballots were pulled out from tables without security tags on them and counted throughout the night until Joe Biden cleared the margin of victory needed. Were these the 9 unsecure "totes" placed and pulled out from under the tables that were separate from all of the other ballots after they placed under the skirted table and put into position for the steal? Finally, how does this all comes together, with these unsecure totes and with fraudulent ballots? Bernard Talmadge owns a company called the "Operations Group, Ardleigh Group," and possibly, "Block by Block." Bernard Talmadge is a known ballot harvester who has been caught in Indiana, charges were brought against him and people who were for him, but were then dropped, from a corrupt court. Checks were found in 2018 all made out for $75-$80 dollars, made out from the Operations Group, and sometimes, the Ardleigh Group. An investigative reporter from Florida named Tom Lauder who did an investigation, and in interviewing witnesses he found that people who worked for the Operations Group and the Ardleigh Group were paid $15 per hour to produce ballots. They had a quota of 10 per-hour, which works out to 1 every 6 minutes. If your running door-to-door in an apartment complex, there is no possible way to get 1 ballot or registration every 6 mins. So what's really going on here? let's proceed. According to the Federal Election Commission, his company has taken in $9.1 MILLION for "field operations." $9.1 million divided by the $75 and multiply it by 50 votes, that's enough money to produce around 6 MILLION ballots. A spreadsheet shown in this presentation shows all the people who gave this company money, what's fascinating is that 1/3 of the $9 MILLION dollars came from the MAINE DEMOCRATIC PARTY. The Maine Democratic Party didn't even take in $3 million dollars during the 2019-2020 election. The evidence of the checks used to pay people were then sent out for background information and analysis, over 400 of them. What was found and what was interesting is that, of the checks that were provided, 2 checks were exactly the same, but one was from a company called "Dreams Enterprises," and the other check comes from the "Ardleigh Group." The signatures on both the checks are exactly the same, the routing numbers are the same, and the account numbers are the same, which can be seen in the video above. So, what kind of illegal ballot producing money laundering operation do we really have going on here? Then we know that foreign countries interfered in the 2020 election including fraudulent ballots, fake IDs, compromised election machines, with China's hands all over it. This is just another piece of the overall puzzle and steal of the 2020 election.
9:41

Data pulled from the Georgia 2020 Election and 2 other states on election night showed impossible vote spikes all over 136,000 votes for Biden when the consecutive averages all throughout the night ranged from 2,000 votes to 45,124 votes at the highest in Georgia. Vote Spikes in Georgia at 1:34 am: 136,155 vote spike: 84% for Joe Biden. 18,788 vote spike: 98% for Joe Biden. 13,035 vote spike: 77% for Joe Biden. 9,385 vote spike: 100% for Joe Biden. Vote dumps contained an average of 49% for Biden in Georgia. Vote Spike in Michigan at 5:31 am: 141,258 votes for Biden: 94% 5,968 votes for Trump: 4% These similar spikes happened in Georgia at 1:34 am, and in Wisconsin at 3:42 am. Vote Spike in Wisconsin at 3:42 am: 143,379 votes for Biden: 85% 25,163 votes for Trump: 15% These vote spikes all favored Biden in highly abnormal, unrealistic percentages, some 98% to 100% for Biden, indicating fraud. The Secretary of State would not provide exact time stamped data when requested, which is concerning, considering they tell you that it's the most transparent election. This is called a cover up. Moving on, the ballot totes that contained ballots were all supposed to have red security tamper-proof tags on them. Pictures and witnesses exposed 9 ballot totes without these tags on them. These "totes" or "suitcases" are very similar to the ones that were hidden under the tables at the State Farm Arena incident where ballots were pulled out from tables without security tags on them and counted throughout the night until Joe Biden cleared the margin of victory needed. Were these the 9 unsecure "totes" placed and pulled out from under the tables that were separate from all of the other ballots after they placed under the skirted table and put into position for the steal? Finally, how does this all comes together, with these unsecure totes and with fraudulent ballots? Bernard Talmadge owns a company called the "Operations Group, Ardleigh Group," and possibly, "Block by Block." Bernard Talmadge is a known ballot harvester who has been caught in Indiana, charges were brought against him and people who were for him, but were then dropped, from a corrupt court. Checks were found in 2018 all made out for $75-$80 dollars, made out from the Operations Group, and sometimes, the Ardleigh Group. An investigative reporter from Florida named Tom Lauder who did an investigation, and in interviewing witnesses he found that people who worked for the Operations Group and the Ardleigh Group were paid $15 per hour to produce ballots. They had a quota of 10 per-hour, which works out to 1 every 6 minutes. If your running door-to-door in an apartment complex, there is no possible way to get 1 ballot or registration every 6 mins. So what's really going on here? let's proceed. According to the Federal Election Commission, his company has taken in $9.1 MILLION for "field operations." $9.1 million divided by the $75 and multiply it by 50 votes, that's enough money to produce around 6 MILLION ballots. A spreadsheet shown in this presentation shows all the people who gave this company money, what's fascinating is that 1/3 of the $9 MILLION dollars came from the MAINE DEMOCRATIC PARTY. The Maine Democratic Party didn't even take in $3 million dollars during the 2019-2020 election. The evidence of the checks used to pay people were then sent out for background information and analysis, over 400 of them. What was found and what was interesting is that, of the checks that were provided, 2 checks were exactly the same, but one was from a company called "Dreams Enterprises," and the other check comes from the "Ardleigh Group." The signatures on both the checks are exactly the same, the routing numbers are the same, and the account numbers are the same, which can be seen in the video above. So, what kind of illegal ballot producing money laundering operation do we really have going on here? Then we know that foreign countries interfered in the 2020 election including fraudulent ballots, fake IDs, compromised election machines, with China's hands all over it. This is just another piece of the overall puzzle and steal of the 2020 election.

The SCIF

22,799 Aufrufe • vor 24 Tagen

2020 Election FRAUD in Fulton County Georgia could see indictments and RICO charges around the corner. These are NOT clerical errors. They are CATASTROHIC breaks in chain of custody and certification. FULTON County Georgia does NOT DISPUTE 315,000 votes lacking poll worker signature verifications. Georgia law requires every DOMINION tabulator to print exactly 3 tapes for the chain of custody at the close of each voting day. All 3 tapes must be witnessed and signed by 3 poll workers, or the reason for refusal must be noted. 1. One signed tape goes on the polling place door 2. The second goes in a sealed envelope with a memory card 3. The third goes in an envelope with a polling place recap form The sign tapes are the soul legal certification that the reported totals are authentic. Fulton County produced ZERO signed tabulator tapes. Every signature block was blank. Identical protective countermeasures were found across several polling places. Dates and times do not match what tapes were filled out at multiple polling stations for ones that were filled out. Duplicated scanner serial numbers where memory devices were moved from one scanner and printed on an alternate scanner. These are not mistakes. These were intentional. The entire 3 part chain of custody was broken. memory units were switched from one computer to another, no logs were filled, no chain of custody, we're not even getting into the heavy election fraud yet and this is only ONE county in one state. Imagine the rest of the country? What could make this even bigger is the fact that there is a problem to where the physical ballots are even located. Did they already destroy the ballots? During a recent meeting one Georgia official asks and is told that the Clerk of Courts has it in their warehouse which has no security, but the worker who asked the question was told before that they are in another location. The 2020 election was stolen. They know it, They know that we know, and we're closing in on them fast.
7:22

2020 Election FRAUD in Fulton County Georgia could see indictments and RICO charges around the corner. These are NOT clerical errors. They are CATASTROHIC breaks in chain of custody and certification. FULTON County Georgia does NOT DISPUTE 315,000 votes lacking poll worker signature verifications. Georgia law requires every DOMINION tabulator to print exactly 3 tapes for the chain of custody at the close of each voting day. All 3 tapes must be witnessed and signed by 3 poll workers, or the reason for refusal must be noted. 1. One signed tape goes on the polling place door 2. The second goes in a sealed envelope with a memory card 3. The third goes in an envelope with a polling place recap form The sign tapes are the soul legal certification that the reported totals are authentic. Fulton County produced ZERO signed tabulator tapes. Every signature block was blank. Identical protective countermeasures were found across several polling places. Dates and times do not match what tapes were filled out at multiple polling stations for ones that were filled out. Duplicated scanner serial numbers where memory devices were moved from one scanner and printed on an alternate scanner. These are not mistakes. These were intentional. The entire 3 part chain of custody was broken. memory units were switched from one computer to another, no logs were filled, no chain of custody, we're not even getting into the heavy election fraud yet and this is only ONE county in one state. Imagine the rest of the country? What could make this even bigger is the fact that there is a problem to where the physical ballots are even located. Did they already destroy the ballots? During a recent meeting one Georgia official asks and is told that the Clerk of Courts has it in their warehouse which has no security, but the worker who asked the question was told before that they are in another location. The 2020 election was stolen. They know it, They know that we know, and we're closing in on them fast.

The SCIF

92,951 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Swedish-Made Medical Coolers Found at UAE-Backed Rapid Support Forces Militia Sites in Khartoum Deepen Allegations of Organ Harvesting and Link Secret Detention Centres, Mass Graves and Thousands of Missing Civilians The Sudanese army has found Swedish-made medical coolers produced by Dometic Medical Systems in areas of Khartoum recaptured from the UAE-backed Rapid Support Forces militia. The equipment is designed to preserve and transport temperature-sensitive medical and biological materials. The discovery strengthens serious allegations that the militia harvested organs from civilians it killed or detained inside the network of secret prisons it established across Khartoum and Darfur, using specialised cooling equipment to preserve and transport the organs through an organised trafficking network. In a letter dated 12 June 2026, the Sudanese government informed the United Nations Security Council that the Rapid Support Forces militia operated mass detention centres where prisoners were subjected to torture, starvation and killing. The letter also stated that foreign medical personnel had participated in removing organs from detainees at Dagris Prison in Nyala as part of a cross-border organ trafficking network. According to the letter, around 20,000 people were being held at Dagris Prison in Nyala, while hundreds of others, including children, were detained at Shalla Prison in El Fasher. The discovery of medical coolers at militia sites in Khartoum adds a physical dimension to these claims and raises direct questions about the fate of thousands of civilians who disappeared after being detained, the recipients of the organs and the routes used to transport them outside Sudan. The equipment was found amid a wider landscape of secret detention centres, torture rooms, mass graves and bodies discovered inside wells, buildings and other locations abandoned by the militia across Khartoum and Omdurman. In Qari, north of Khartoum, an investigation published by The Guardian documented a detention centre operated by the Rapid Support Forces militia, with hundreds of unmarked graves nearby. Survivors described beatings, torture, starvation and executions. Estimates cited in the investigation indicated that more than 500 people may have died from torture or deprivation of food before being buried around the prison. Images from inside the facility showed bloodstained rooms, iron restraints and areas prepared for the punishment and torture of detainees. Survivors also described repeated killings and the abandonment of sick and wounded prisoners without treatment as hunger and disease spread through overcrowded cells. Photographs and videos of prisoners released from militia detention centres provided further evidence of the conditions inside. Several survivors appeared severely emaciated, with their bodies reduced to skin and bone by starvation, torture and the denial of water and medical care. One of the most widely documented cases was that of businessman and community activist Al-Waleed Abdeen, who emerged from a militia detention centre in Jebel Aulia after losing so much weight that some relatives struggled to recognise him. Images showed his bones protruding beneath his skin after months of detention, torture and starvation. He later died from the consequences of the abuse he had suffered. In Khartoum’s Al-Fayhaa neighbourhood, authorities found the bodies of 11 people, including women and children, inside a deep well after the militia withdrew from the area. Police said the victims had been killed during the Rapid Support Forces militia’s control of the neighbourhood and their bodies thrown into the well in an attempt to conceal the crime. Authorities also announced the discovery of mass graves in the Al-Riyadh district and other parts of Khartoum containing the remains of people killed while the militia controlled the capital. These sites add to the unidentified graves and bodies found inside homes, civilian buildings and former detention facilities. These findings connect thousands of missing civilians whose whereabouts became unknown after their arrest, detainees who died under torture and starvation, mass graves uncovered after the militia’s withdrawal and specialised medical coolers found inside its positions. Together, they strengthen allegations that the militia’s detention system extended from torture, killing and enforced disappearance to the exploitation of victims’ bodies, the removal of their organs and their transfer through an organised criminal network. The allegations are consistent with the broader pattern of crimes committed by the militia since the war began. In El Geneina, the Rapid Support Forces militia and allied forces carried out mass killings, sexual violence, torture, looting, the burning of neighbourhoods and forced displacement, targeting the Masalit and other non-Arab communities in particular. Human rights organisations described the campaign as ethnic cleansing involving war crimes and crimes against humanity. In Al Jazira State, the militia attacked dozens of villages and towns, killed civilians inside homes, markets and roads, committed sexual violence, kidnappings and unlawful detention, looted hospitals, farms and private property, and forced large numbers of residents to flee. In El Fasher, the United Nations Independent International Fact-Finding Mission said the evidence revealed a campaign bearing the hallmarks of genocide. The documented acts included ethnically motivated killings, attacks on non-Arab communities, widespread sexual violence, forced displacement and the deliberate denial of food, water and medical care. International reports also documented field executions, torture, mass killings, the organised abduction of women and girls, gang rape, sexual slavery and attacks on children and civilians attempting to flee the city. In recent weeks, the militia’s attacks on civilians have expanded to markets, schools, water sources, power stations and fuel facilities through the use of drones. The strikes included attacks in El Obeid on markets, service facilities, fuel stations and water points, as well as the market and surrounding residential areas in Al-Rahad Abu Dukhna. A drone also struck the only water well in the Andro area of North Darfur, killing and injuring dozens of civilians who had gathered to obtain water. The medical coolers were found at the centre of a wider record involving secret prisons, survivors reduced to skeletal figures, mass graves, bodies dumped in wells and thousands of civilians who disappeared after detention, alongside official information submitted to the Security Council concerning the harvesting and trafficking of detainees’ organs. The growing body of evidence points to an organised system of killing, torture, starvation and enforced disappearance in areas controlled by the Rapid Support Forces militia. The allegations now extend to the trafficking of victims’ bodies and organs, amid the military, financial and logistical support the militia has continued to receive from the United Arab Emirates. Video source: X account العــــالمي ♛🦅 💙|🇸🇩 #Sudan #RSFisTerroristOrganization #UAEKillsSudanesePeople #UAESponsorsTerrorism
0:45

Swedish-Made Medical Coolers Found at UAE-Backed Rapid Support Forces Militia Sites in Khartoum Deepen Allegations of Organ Harvesting and Link Secret Detention Centres, Mass Graves and Thousands of Missing Civilians The Sudanese army has found Swedish-made medical coolers produced by Dometic Medical Systems in areas of Khartoum recaptured from the UAE-backed Rapid Support Forces militia. The equipment is designed to preserve and transport temperature-sensitive medical and biological materials. The discovery strengthens serious allegations that the militia harvested organs from civilians it killed or detained inside the network of secret prisons it established across Khartoum and Darfur, using specialised cooling equipment to preserve and transport the organs through an organised trafficking network. In a letter dated 12 June 2026, the Sudanese government informed the United Nations Security Council that the Rapid Support Forces militia operated mass detention centres where prisoners were subjected to torture, starvation and killing. The letter also stated that foreign medical personnel had participated in removing organs from detainees at Dagris Prison in Nyala as part of a cross-border organ trafficking network. According to the letter, around 20,000 people were being held at Dagris Prison in Nyala, while hundreds of others, including children, were detained at Shalla Prison in El Fasher. The discovery of medical coolers at militia sites in Khartoum adds a physical dimension to these claims and raises direct questions about the fate of thousands of civilians who disappeared after being detained, the recipients of the organs and the routes used to transport them outside Sudan. The equipment was found amid a wider landscape of secret detention centres, torture rooms, mass graves and bodies discovered inside wells, buildings and other locations abandoned by the militia across Khartoum and Omdurman. In Qari, north of Khartoum, an investigation published by The Guardian documented a detention centre operated by the Rapid Support Forces militia, with hundreds of unmarked graves nearby. Survivors described beatings, torture, starvation and executions. Estimates cited in the investigation indicated that more than 500 people may have died from torture or deprivation of food before being buried around the prison. Images from inside the facility showed bloodstained rooms, iron restraints and areas prepared for the punishment and torture of detainees. Survivors also described repeated killings and the abandonment of sick and wounded prisoners without treatment as hunger and disease spread through overcrowded cells. Photographs and videos of prisoners released from militia detention centres provided further evidence of the conditions inside. Several survivors appeared severely emaciated, with their bodies reduced to skin and bone by starvation, torture and the denial of water and medical care. One of the most widely documented cases was that of businessman and community activist Al-Waleed Abdeen, who emerged from a militia detention centre in Jebel Aulia after losing so much weight that some relatives struggled to recognise him. Images showed his bones protruding beneath his skin after months of detention, torture and starvation. He later died from the consequences of the abuse he had suffered. In Khartoum’s Al-Fayhaa neighbourhood, authorities found the bodies of 11 people, including women and children, inside a deep well after the militia withdrew from the area. Police said the victims had been killed during the Rapid Support Forces militia’s control of the neighbourhood and their bodies thrown into the well in an attempt to conceal the crime. Authorities also announced the discovery of mass graves in the Al-Riyadh district and other parts of Khartoum containing the remains of people killed while the militia controlled the capital. These sites add to the unidentified graves and bodies found inside homes, civilian buildings and former detention facilities. These findings connect thousands of missing civilians whose whereabouts became unknown after their arrest, detainees who died under torture and starvation, mass graves uncovered after the militia’s withdrawal and specialised medical coolers found inside its positions. Together, they strengthen allegations that the militia’s detention system extended from torture, killing and enforced disappearance to the exploitation of victims’ bodies, the removal of their organs and their transfer through an organised criminal network. The allegations are consistent with the broader pattern of crimes committed by the militia since the war began. In El Geneina, the Rapid Support Forces militia and allied forces carried out mass killings, sexual violence, torture, looting, the burning of neighbourhoods and forced displacement, targeting the Masalit and other non-Arab communities in particular. Human rights organisations described the campaign as ethnic cleansing involving war crimes and crimes against humanity. In Al Jazira State, the militia attacked dozens of villages and towns, killed civilians inside homes, markets and roads, committed sexual violence, kidnappings and unlawful detention, looted hospitals, farms and private property, and forced large numbers of residents to flee. In El Fasher, the United Nations Independent International Fact-Finding Mission said the evidence revealed a campaign bearing the hallmarks of genocide. The documented acts included ethnically motivated killings, attacks on non-Arab communities, widespread sexual violence, forced displacement and the deliberate denial of food, water and medical care. International reports also documented field executions, torture, mass killings, the organised abduction of women and girls, gang rape, sexual slavery and attacks on children and civilians attempting to flee the city. In recent weeks, the militia’s attacks on civilians have expanded to markets, schools, water sources, power stations and fuel facilities through the use of drones. The strikes included attacks in El Obeid on markets, service facilities, fuel stations and water points, as well as the market and surrounding residential areas in Al-Rahad Abu Dukhna. A drone also struck the only water well in the Andro area of North Darfur, killing and injuring dozens of civilians who had gathered to obtain water. The medical coolers were found at the centre of a wider record involving secret prisons, survivors reduced to skeletal figures, mass graves, bodies dumped in wells and thousands of civilians who disappeared after detention, alongside official information submitted to the Security Council concerning the harvesting and trafficking of detainees’ organs. The growing body of evidence points to an organised system of killing, torture, starvation and enforced disappearance in areas controlled by the Rapid Support Forces militia. The allegations now extend to the trafficking of victims’ bodies and organs, amid the military, financial and logistical support the militia has continued to receive from the United Arab Emirates. Video source: X account العــــالمي ♛🦅 💙|🇸🇩 #Sudan #RSFisTerroristOrganization #UAEKillsSudanesePeople #UAESponsorsTerrorism

Sudanese Echo

27,626 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

Massive 2020 election fraud operation exposed, with video, and THOUSANDS of fake voter registrations for Joe Biden sent to the FBI by Michigan police who did NOTHING and BURIED the EVIDENCE! A woman was caught on video dropping off around 10,000 fraudulent voter registrations at the Muskegon City Clerk's office in October 2020. The fake voter registrations contained forged signatures, fake addresses, fake phone numbers, identical handwriting, and fake DOBs. Muskegon Police and Michigan Attorney General's office launched a joint probe after learning the woman's identity who dropped off the fake voter registrations. They interviewed the GBI supervisor and determined a large number of forms were fraudulent. A search warrant was issued at GBI Strategies office and uncovered the fake voter registration operation. At the GBI Strategies office in Southfield, police found tons of fraudulent voter registrations forms for Joe Biden, computer tablets, burner/prepaid phones, pay cards, canvassing T-shirts, rental vans, and weapons, including automatic rifles with suppressors and optics. GBI was running the same operation across multiple Michigan cities, including Muskegon, Benton Harbor, Inkster, Flint, and Southfield. This was an absolutely MASSIVE and well-funded fraudulent voter registration operation for the DNC and Joe Biden to steal the 2020 election. Michigan State Police and local authorities compiled documents, forms, and video footage of the fraud and officially transferred everything to the FBI in 2021, citing national jurisdiction because GBI is Tennessee-based and active in multiple states. The FBI buried EVERYTHING. Despite the mountain of evidence, the FBI took no public action, filed no charges, and buried it. Michigan authorities were forced to close their own investigation. The case was shutdown from the highest levels and was deliberately covered up, even with all the evidence of massive voter fraud. The operation was funded by Democrat-linked PACs and part of a nationwide scheme to flood voter rolls with fraudulent registrations to steal the 2020 election, which was successful. This is smoking-gun proof that federal agencies protected fraud for Joe Biden for the 2020 election instead of stopping it. Every single one of these people need to be identified and prosecuted.
4:07

Massive 2020 election fraud operation exposed, with video, and THOUSANDS of fake voter registrations for Joe Biden sent to the FBI by Michigan police who did NOTHING and BURIED the EVIDENCE! A woman was caught on video dropping off around 10,000 fraudulent voter registrations at the Muskegon City Clerk's office in October 2020. The fake voter registrations contained forged signatures, fake addresses, fake phone numbers, identical handwriting, and fake DOBs. Muskegon Police and Michigan Attorney General's office launched a joint probe after learning the woman's identity who dropped off the fake voter registrations. They interviewed the GBI supervisor and determined a large number of forms were fraudulent. A search warrant was issued at GBI Strategies office and uncovered the fake voter registration operation. At the GBI Strategies office in Southfield, police found tons of fraudulent voter registrations forms for Joe Biden, computer tablets, burner/prepaid phones, pay cards, canvassing T-shirts, rental vans, and weapons, including automatic rifles with suppressors and optics. GBI was running the same operation across multiple Michigan cities, including Muskegon, Benton Harbor, Inkster, Flint, and Southfield. This was an absolutely MASSIVE and well-funded fraudulent voter registration operation for the DNC and Joe Biden to steal the 2020 election. Michigan State Police and local authorities compiled documents, forms, and video footage of the fraud and officially transferred everything to the FBI in 2021, citing national jurisdiction because GBI is Tennessee-based and active in multiple states. The FBI buried EVERYTHING. Despite the mountain of evidence, the FBI took no public action, filed no charges, and buried it. Michigan authorities were forced to close their own investigation. The case was shutdown from the highest levels and was deliberately covered up, even with all the evidence of massive voter fraud. The operation was funded by Democrat-linked PACs and part of a nationwide scheme to flood voter rolls with fraudulent registrations to steal the 2020 election, which was successful. This is smoking-gun proof that federal agencies protected fraud for Joe Biden for the 2020 election instead of stopping it. Every single one of these people need to be identified and prosecuted.

The SCIF

12,993 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🦠Dr. Pierre Kory describes the exact moment his trust in every major institution shattered. He started as a focused scientist, but when COVID hit, he began examining the official guidance with fresh eyes. What he found was a complete absence of logic or grounding. Decisions made no sense. Natural immunity- something established for centuries- vanished overnight because of a single FDA webpage declaring there was “no evidence” for considering it. The entire medical establishment went along without question. Then came ivermectin. A patient had been sick for two weeks: persistent fevers, resting heart rate of 120. A pulmonologist prescribed ivermectin based on Dr. Kory’s paper. She took it and went to bed. The next morning, no fever, heart rate 80, completely transformed. That wasn’t an outlier. It happened again and again in his practice, like we have heard from so many other clinicians providing early treatment. This was his lived reality as a frontline clinician. Yet every major outlet, every scientific authority, every media voice called him a fraud. His direct observations were dismissed, distorted, and attacked. He’s not just a doctor anymore. He’s a citizen who watched the systems he once trusted lie to his face. If you’ve ever felt gaslit by the headlines, watch this clip. It’s clarity, not rage. The full video is below. Watch it. Then look around and ask yourself: what else have we been told that doesn’t match reality?
1:30

🦠Dr. Pierre Kory describes the exact moment his trust in every major institution shattered. He started as a focused scientist, but when COVID hit, he began examining the official guidance with fresh eyes. What he found was a complete absence of logic or grounding. Decisions made no sense. Natural immunity- something established for centuries- vanished overnight because of a single FDA webpage declaring there was “no evidence” for considering it. The entire medical establishment went along without question. Then came ivermectin. A patient had been sick for two weeks: persistent fevers, resting heart rate of 120. A pulmonologist prescribed ivermectin based on Dr. Kory’s paper. She took it and went to bed. The next morning, no fever, heart rate 80, completely transformed. That wasn’t an outlier. It happened again and again in his practice, like we have heard from so many other clinicians providing early treatment. This was his lived reality as a frontline clinician. Yet every major outlet, every scientific authority, every media voice called him a fraud. His direct observations were dismissed, distorted, and attacked. He’s not just a doctor anymore. He’s a citizen who watched the systems he once trusted lie to his face. If you’ve ever felt gaslit by the headlines, watch this clip. It’s clarity, not rage. The full video is below. Watch it. Then look around and ask yourself: what else have we been told that doesn’t match reality?

The HighWire

43,381 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Thank-you Dominique of 7. The Danielle Smith video below, is a small start in trying to express the severe issues & lack of progress we continue to face in Alberta. Sadly, the beautiful, charming, charismatic woman we have elected & who's acting as Madame Premier, is really a master & pro. at talking out of both sides of her mouth. I've lost count. Give it a try? So far, we have observed exactly zero real consequences, zero real accountability & zero meaningful & effective changes, after witnessing the needless deaths and immeasurable suffering of many thousands of innocent Albertans. *RIP* Sheila Annette Lewis. The Real National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC) We now have a recently amended Public Health Act that's just as tyrannical as the previous version. A CMOH, who is just as tyrannical or possibly even worse than the evil Deena HINSHAW. In Alberta & on a (vaccinated) doctors certificate; -Cops can arrest you without warrant!!! -A doctor is authorized to perform any test, any physical examination, and hold you against your will for as long as deemed necessary. -Forcefully and without your consent, administer any treatment they deem necessary, while holding you against your will, and if that's not enough, they can also impose any other conditions they doctor deems necessary!!! We have a court decision & ruling by Justice Romaine that paves the way for even more lawfully backed & legally approved tyranny, the next time a fake pandemic is declared. But wait! What about the "New" Alberta Bill Of Rights? Even the main lawyer Mr. Jeffrey Rath writes this; "According to Justice Romaine, had Deena Hinshaw simply acted as the Dictator of Alberta and made all of her orders bankrupting businesses and driving suicides in the province of Alberta personally, without Kenney’s involvement, Justice Romaine would have found the Orders to be perfectly legal. Romaine J. states at paragraph 56 and 57 of her judgement:" Plus so much more! If you don't see the problems we continue to face, after carefully examining the contents and substance contained within this video of Danielle Smith & her in-depth statements, then I am convinced it's hopeless trying to get you to see the issue. NOTHING HAS REALLY BEEN ACCOMPLISHED For meaningful & lasting results, what should be achieved is this below; -Sec. 220 C.C.C. Criminal Negligence Causing Death. -Sec. 465 (1)(c) C.C.C. Conspiracy To Commit. -Section 180 (1) C.C.C. & Section 180 (2) C.C.C. Common Nuisance. Bob Blayone - "Dr Roger Hodkinson and Dr William Makis brought fire." William (MakisMD) spoke about the absolute failure of Danielle Smith, United Conservative (Government of Alberta), NDP, Alberta Health Services, of their crimes against humanity, crimes against Alberta men, women and children, death and injury via Covid-19 injections and Remdesivir, of the breakdown of public health, doctors who continue to be to ruled by a mafioso of College of Physicians and Surgeons, of the College’s ongoing persecutions of doctors like Dr Hodkinson, facing a College tribunal in a month. William reminded the audience (a few die hard Smith/UCP defenders); - Smith’s prior political promise to defend persecuted doctors like Hodkinson, Daniel Nagase and others from the College - College is a private entity not governed by government but given their power by government - Smith as Premier, at the stroke of a pen, has the authority to dissolve the College of Physicians and Surgeons as well as the College of Nurses and Pharmacists At the stroke of a pen (Smith or the next plugged in puppet) that authority removes the College’s unaccountable, unaudited, heavy handed, genocidal, pedophile protecting, unchecked power over doctors, nurses and pharmacists. One individual turned to me and said, “I wonder who is threatening Smith?” I replied, “Are you kidding?! Do you understand that at the end of the day we’re living in a time of war here, where at its core there’s an agenda to depopulate the earth? Do you not think that there might not be a lot of collaboration in that?” William spoke about in the event of another World Health Organization “global pandemic”, as it stands today in Alberta, in accordance with the Canada wide precedent setting Ingram/Romaine ruling, in the Alberta Public Health Act as it stands today, in the worse than Deena Hinshaw latest UCP appointed Alberta Chief Medical Officer of Health in Mark Joffe, the “run, don’t walk to get your next covid booster” doctor, as it stands today on the WHO’s declaration of a pandemic, the Chief Medical Officer of Health, an unelected, unhinged bureaucrat, will hold absolute unchecked power in Alberta. Including authority to force vaccinated Albertans.
15:26

Thank-you Dominique of 7. The Danielle Smith video below, is a small start in trying to express the severe issues & lack of progress we continue to face in Alberta. Sadly, the beautiful, charming, charismatic woman we have elected & who's acting as Madame Premier, is really a master & pro. at talking out of both sides of her mouth. I've lost count. Give it a try? So far, we have observed exactly zero real consequences, zero real accountability & zero meaningful & effective changes, after witnessing the needless deaths and immeasurable suffering of many thousands of innocent Albertans. *RIP* Sheila Annette Lewis. The Real National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC) We now have a recently amended Public Health Act that's just as tyrannical as the previous version. A CMOH, who is just as tyrannical or possibly even worse than the evil Deena HINSHAW. In Alberta & on a (vaccinated) doctors certificate; -Cops can arrest you without warrant!!! -A doctor is authorized to perform any test, any physical examination, and hold you against your will for as long as deemed necessary. -Forcefully and without your consent, administer any treatment they deem necessary, while holding you against your will, and if that's not enough, they can also impose any other conditions they doctor deems necessary!!! We have a court decision & ruling by Justice Romaine that paves the way for even more lawfully backed & legally approved tyranny, the next time a fake pandemic is declared. But wait! What about the "New" Alberta Bill Of Rights? Even the main lawyer Mr. Jeffrey Rath writes this; "According to Justice Romaine, had Deena Hinshaw simply acted as the Dictator of Alberta and made all of her orders bankrupting businesses and driving suicides in the province of Alberta personally, without Kenney’s involvement, Justice Romaine would have found the Orders to be perfectly legal. Romaine J. states at paragraph 56 and 57 of her judgement:" Plus so much more! If you don't see the problems we continue to face, after carefully examining the contents and substance contained within this video of Danielle Smith & her in-depth statements, then I am convinced it's hopeless trying to get you to see the issue. NOTHING HAS REALLY BEEN ACCOMPLISHED For meaningful & lasting results, what should be achieved is this below; -Sec. 220 C.C.C. Criminal Negligence Causing Death. -Sec. 465 (1)(c) C.C.C. Conspiracy To Commit. -Section 180 (1) C.C.C. & Section 180 (2) C.C.C. Common Nuisance. Bob Blayone - "Dr Roger Hodkinson and Dr William Makis brought fire." William (MakisMD) spoke about the absolute failure of Danielle Smith, United Conservative (Government of Alberta), NDP, Alberta Health Services, of their crimes against humanity, crimes against Alberta men, women and children, death and injury via Covid-19 injections and Remdesivir, of the breakdown of public health, doctors who continue to be to ruled by a mafioso of College of Physicians and Surgeons, of the College’s ongoing persecutions of doctors like Dr Hodkinson, facing a College tribunal in a month. William reminded the audience (a few die hard Smith/UCP defenders); - Smith’s prior political promise to defend persecuted doctors like Hodkinson, Daniel Nagase and others from the College - College is a private entity not governed by government but given their power by government - Smith as Premier, at the stroke of a pen, has the authority to dissolve the College of Physicians and Surgeons as well as the College of Nurses and Pharmacists At the stroke of a pen (Smith or the next plugged in puppet) that authority removes the College’s unaccountable, unaudited, heavy handed, genocidal, pedophile protecting, unchecked power over doctors, nurses and pharmacists. One individual turned to me and said, “I wonder who is threatening Smith?” I replied, “Are you kidding?! Do you understand that at the end of the day we’re living in a time of war here, where at its core there’s an agenda to depopulate the earth? Do you not think that there might not be a lot of collaboration in that?” William spoke about in the event of another World Health Organization “global pandemic”, as it stands today in Alberta, in accordance with the Canada wide precedent setting Ingram/Romaine ruling, in the Alberta Public Health Act as it stands today, in the worse than Deena Hinshaw latest UCP appointed Alberta Chief Medical Officer of Health in Mark Joffe, the “run, don’t walk to get your next covid booster” doctor, as it stands today on the WHO’s declaration of a pandemic, the Chief Medical Officer of Health, an unelected, unhinged bureaucrat, will hold absolute unchecked power in Alberta. Including authority to force vaccinated Albertans.

LIVMOR®

14,158 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

[ condition update ] 🐻‍❄ In short of what happen with me is an inflammation on heart muscle from a virus infection which still cant be identified yet. The symptoms I experience are painful breathing, heart racing, tight chest, difficulty breathing, kinda thing. I’m told not to overwork my heart because it could make the inflammation gets worse. That’s basically in short. As for the details, it was 4-5 days ago, I started feeling uncomfortable in my chest, it felt tight and I had trouble breathing as well. Anytime I did something, like exercising or walking on a treadmill, my body felt hurt, and my heart rate went up way higher than usual. It’s normally around 100, but it went to 150 even when I was just doing little activity. It felt off, so I thought I might have caught some kind of infection. The other day I made a doctor appointment in the hospital as I got some free time. I was told to go to internal medicine doctor and was asked about what I’ve been experiencing. I had fever, waking up found tightness in chest at one night, a nausea, but nothing came out. I just felt like about to vomiting but nothing came out at all, so I thought it was unusual. At that time, my face went all pale and lips went all purple already, which why I decided to go to the hospital. Once I was in the internal medicine, well, they did some screening. I said I have low fever, painful breathing, body and muscle pain, so I was sent to ENT because I experience a ringing in my ear as well, I then sent to do a hearing function test. Right ear was normal, while my left ear was.. what’s it called.. ringing in ear. My left ear hearing function drops down one level. It’s not that serious but since it’s related to inner ear, and it's a part of nervous system, right? If it’s affecting that, the doctor afraid it could lead to permanent hearing function loss. Yeah, that part is concerning. So I was prescribed steroids to be consumed to prevent further inflammation and damage more than this. Not sure if I’m explaining it right, but that’s what I remember. I’m not a doctor, lol. And then, after I got the steroids and back home, I had work to film on the next day. I was like, why I feel so tired going for work at 6 in the morning, why my body feels this exhausting, just bending over to grab something or doing other things made me feel like I was gonna pass out. Thought I was just old lol. But at that time I felt unwell, my chest felt tight, and I felt exhausted. That day, I kept working even though I was exhausted. I felt like I don’t wanna work anymore, it was tiring, even just walking up the stairs, I had to stop and take a break. I couldn’t do it, it felt so tiring. When filming, just stepping my legs already felt tiring that I didn’t want to step my legs anymore. So that day decided to see a doctor, focusing to check my heart as it felt tight and was racing, and I had pain when breathing as well so I decided to see a heart specialist doctor but I arrived there at 2 PM and there was no available appointment anymore. Also, the Echo or ECG machine was all used so I had to schedule an appointment for the next day. I went there in the afternoon. Blood pressure and other test was normal, around 110-160, and it’s normal. Pulse is normal. Blood pressure was okay. And what else, yeah that’s it. I had an ECG, the result came out normal. I’ve also just get physical check up recently and the result were almost the same when compared. But since I still didn’t feel well, I wanted to know what’s wrong with me so I asked for a blood test. It’s a blood test that focusing on troponin and CRP level, which are enzymes in blood cells that indicate heart issues if the levels are high. After my blood test, I waited an hour for the results. When they called me, they said my symptom is serious, it’s a heart disease. Normal troponin levels are below 1 for healthy human, but mine was 3800, which is extremely high, so I had to be admitted. This is an enzyme level in the heart muscle cells. If heart muscle is damaged or its cells break down, the enzyme will mix into the blood and can be detected in the blood indicating a heart problem, so I need to be admitted for further examination with echo. It’s an ultrasound for heart. The result saying that there’s an inflammation in my heart as predicted by the doctors. The heart muscle is really swollen and… [takes deep breath] oh I’m tired already. It's enlarging which makes my heart race and feel tight and uncomfortable. That’s what they said. It’s not working the way it should, which is why I get tired so easily. So it answers everything. After the echo I took a rest and got therapy regimen… as what I understand, consuming steroid can suppress the immune system, right? They help reduce inflammation while the body fights the virus. It’s reducing the inflammation, right? But they said steroids alone weren’t enough because my troponin levels were way too abnormally high, so I got an injection instead. [deep breath] I got injected last night for only three dosage because I had to work today in the morning.asked the doctor to discharge me cause I had to work first. But the decision was taken with condition. I got injected three dosage in the morning and did another blood test which show a result of a decrease in troponin level from 3800 to 1600. Doctor said it was probably 5000 before this and it keeps decreasing to 3800, and to 1600, So if the work isn’t too hard physically, I’m allowed to go, I then go to work. Today at work I was only standing around and talking around. I can stand and talk, but I can’t do any heavy work as it’ll will make my heart work hard and affecting the recovery, I then have to walk slowly. But even so, I can’t even walk fast tho, I get tired easily. Yeah, that’s all. It’s not like I’m completely bedrotting or something, it’s just heart muscle problem, so… fighting ✌🏻
10:26

[ condition update ] 🐻‍❄ In short of what happen with me is an inflammation on heart muscle from a virus infection which still cant be identified yet. The symptoms I experience are painful breathing, heart racing, tight chest, difficulty breathing, kinda thing. I’m told not to overwork my heart because it could make the inflammation gets worse. That’s basically in short. As for the details, it was 4-5 days ago, I started feeling uncomfortable in my chest, it felt tight and I had trouble breathing as well. Anytime I did something, like exercising or walking on a treadmill, my body felt hurt, and my heart rate went up way higher than usual. It’s normally around 100, but it went to 150 even when I was just doing little activity. It felt off, so I thought I might have caught some kind of infection. The other day I made a doctor appointment in the hospital as I got some free time. I was told to go to internal medicine doctor and was asked about what I’ve been experiencing. I had fever, waking up found tightness in chest at one night, a nausea, but nothing came out. I just felt like about to vomiting but nothing came out at all, so I thought it was unusual. At that time, my face went all pale and lips went all purple already, which why I decided to go to the hospital. Once I was in the internal medicine, well, they did some screening. I said I have low fever, painful breathing, body and muscle pain, so I was sent to ENT because I experience a ringing in my ear as well, I then sent to do a hearing function test. Right ear was normal, while my left ear was.. what’s it called.. ringing in ear. My left ear hearing function drops down one level. It’s not that serious but since it’s related to inner ear, and it's a part of nervous system, right? If it’s affecting that, the doctor afraid it could lead to permanent hearing function loss. Yeah, that part is concerning. So I was prescribed steroids to be consumed to prevent further inflammation and damage more than this. Not sure if I’m explaining it right, but that’s what I remember. I’m not a doctor, lol. And then, after I got the steroids and back home, I had work to film on the next day. I was like, why I feel so tired going for work at 6 in the morning, why my body feels this exhausting, just bending over to grab something or doing other things made me feel like I was gonna pass out. Thought I was just old lol. But at that time I felt unwell, my chest felt tight, and I felt exhausted. That day, I kept working even though I was exhausted. I felt like I don’t wanna work anymore, it was tiring, even just walking up the stairs, I had to stop and take a break. I couldn’t do it, it felt so tiring. When filming, just stepping my legs already felt tiring that I didn’t want to step my legs anymore. So that day decided to see a doctor, focusing to check my heart as it felt tight and was racing, and I had pain when breathing as well so I decided to see a heart specialist doctor but I arrived there at 2 PM and there was no available appointment anymore. Also, the Echo or ECG machine was all used so I had to schedule an appointment for the next day. I went there in the afternoon. Blood pressure and other test was normal, around 110-160, and it’s normal. Pulse is normal. Blood pressure was okay. And what else, yeah that’s it. I had an ECG, the result came out normal. I’ve also just get physical check up recently and the result were almost the same when compared. But since I still didn’t feel well, I wanted to know what’s wrong with me so I asked for a blood test. It’s a blood test that focusing on troponin and CRP level, which are enzymes in blood cells that indicate heart issues if the levels are high. After my blood test, I waited an hour for the results. When they called me, they said my symptom is serious, it’s a heart disease. Normal troponin levels are below 1 for healthy human, but mine was 3800, which is extremely high, so I had to be admitted. This is an enzyme level in the heart muscle cells. If heart muscle is damaged or its cells break down, the enzyme will mix into the blood and can be detected in the blood indicating a heart problem, so I need to be admitted for further examination with echo. It’s an ultrasound for heart. The result saying that there’s an inflammation in my heart as predicted by the doctors. The heart muscle is really swollen and… [takes deep breath] oh I’m tired already. It's enlarging which makes my heart race and feel tight and uncomfortable. That’s what they said. It’s not working the way it should, which is why I get tired so easily. So it answers everything. After the echo I took a rest and got therapy regimen… as what I understand, consuming steroid can suppress the immune system, right? They help reduce inflammation while the body fights the virus. It’s reducing the inflammation, right? But they said steroids alone weren’t enough because my troponin levels were way too abnormally high, so I got an injection instead. [deep breath] I got injected last night for only three dosage because I had to work today in the morning.asked the doctor to discharge me cause I had to work first. But the decision was taken with condition. I got injected three dosage in the morning and did another blood test which show a result of a decrease in troponin level from 3800 to 1600. Doctor said it was probably 5000 before this and it keeps decreasing to 3800, and to 1600, So if the work isn’t too hard physically, I’m allowed to go, I then go to work. Today at work I was only standing around and talking around. I can stand and talk, but I can’t do any heavy work as it’ll will make my heart work hard and affecting the recovery, I then have to walk slowly. But even so, I can’t even walk fast tho, I get tired easily. Yeah, that’s all. It’s not like I’m completely bedrotting or something, it’s just heart muscle problem, so… fighting ✌🏻

deeコ

148,010 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🇯🇵Japanese Civility vs. the Erosion of Tradition: A Tale of Two Cultures! Japanese fans have long been admired worldwide for a simple yet profound act of responsibility. After soccer or baseball matches, they routinely stay behind to collect every piece of trash, wipe down seats, and leave stadiums cleaner than they found them. This is not a publicity stunt but a deeply ingrained cultural habit. From elementary school onward, Japanese children learn to clean their classrooms and shared spaces. Concepts like mottainai—a sense of regret over waste—and respect for public property shape daily life. The result is visible discipline: orderly queues, low litter, and a collective understanding that one’s actions affect the community. In 2026, as the World Cup unfolds, this tradition continues to earn global praise. It reflects a society that values self-reliance, harmony, and personal accountability over convenience. The contrast with many mainland Chinese and Chinese tourists is striking and frequently documented. In popular destinations in China and across Asia, Europe, and beyond, reports and videos often show groups leaving behind piles of food wrappers, plastic bottles, and discarded items in parks, beaches, and landmarks. While not every individual behaves this way, the pattern has become noticeable enough to prompt complaints from local authorities and other visitors. This behavior clashes sharply with Japan’s approach and raises uncomfortable questions about differing standards of public conduct. These differences are not rooted in ethnicity or inherent national character. Chinese civilization once emphasized Confucian principles of propriety (li 禮), harmony, and self-cultivation. Filial piety, respect for elders, and communal responsibility formed the moral foundation for centuries. However, under decades of CCP rule, these traditions faced systematic attack. The Cultural Revolution explicitly targeted the “Four Olds”—old ideas, culture, customs, and habits—destroying temples, burning books, and persecuting intellectuals and traditional practitioners. Subsequent policies prioritized class struggle, ideological conformity, and rapid material development over moral education. The result, observable in parts of mainland society today, includes weakened social trust, a focus on personal gain, and diminished regard for shared spaces. State propaganda and education have often emphasized collective loyalty to the Party rather than individual virtue or universal ethics. When people grow up without strong reinforcement of personal responsibility, public behavior can suffer. By comparison, overseas Chinese communities—in Taiwan, Singapore, Hong Kong’s earlier era, and diaspora populations worldwide—have largely preserved traditional values. Emphasis on education, family cohesion, hard work, and courteous conduct remains prominent. Many excel in business and academia precisely because these cultural strengths were not uprooted by the same ideological campaigns. Their reputation for civility and reliability often stands in positive contrast to reports from the mainland. Japan demonstrates what is possible when a culture actively nurtures discipline and respect across generations. Its success is not accidental but the product of consistent education and societal norms that survived modernization. China’s challenges with public conduct in some contexts stem less from the people themselves than from governance that disrupted the transmission of civilizational values. Restoring emphasis on traditional ethics—personal accountability, respect for others, and care for shared environments—could help bridge the gap, regardless of political system. The Japanese example offers a clear lesson: civilization is not inherited automatically. It must be taught, practiced, and protected. When ideology supplants tradition, the human cost appears in everyday manners and public spaces. When culture is preserved, the results speak for themselves through quiet acts like cleaning up after oneself. The choice between these paths remains one of the most important facing any society.
0:20

🇯🇵Japanese Civility vs. the Erosion of Tradition: A Tale of Two Cultures! Japanese fans have long been admired worldwide for a simple yet profound act of responsibility. After soccer or baseball matches, they routinely stay behind to collect every piece of trash, wipe down seats, and leave stadiums cleaner than they found them. This is not a publicity stunt but a deeply ingrained cultural habit. From elementary school onward, Japanese children learn to clean their classrooms and shared spaces. Concepts like mottainai—a sense of regret over waste—and respect for public property shape daily life. The result is visible discipline: orderly queues, low litter, and a collective understanding that one’s actions affect the community. In 2026, as the World Cup unfolds, this tradition continues to earn global praise. It reflects a society that values self-reliance, harmony, and personal accountability over convenience. The contrast with many mainland Chinese and Chinese tourists is striking and frequently documented. In popular destinations in China and across Asia, Europe, and beyond, reports and videos often show groups leaving behind piles of food wrappers, plastic bottles, and discarded items in parks, beaches, and landmarks. While not every individual behaves this way, the pattern has become noticeable enough to prompt complaints from local authorities and other visitors. This behavior clashes sharply with Japan’s approach and raises uncomfortable questions about differing standards of public conduct. These differences are not rooted in ethnicity or inherent national character. Chinese civilization once emphasized Confucian principles of propriety (li 禮), harmony, and self-cultivation. Filial piety, respect for elders, and communal responsibility formed the moral foundation for centuries. However, under decades of CCP rule, these traditions faced systematic attack. The Cultural Revolution explicitly targeted the “Four Olds”—old ideas, culture, customs, and habits—destroying temples, burning books, and persecuting intellectuals and traditional practitioners. Subsequent policies prioritized class struggle, ideological conformity, and rapid material development over moral education. The result, observable in parts of mainland society today, includes weakened social trust, a focus on personal gain, and diminished regard for shared spaces. State propaganda and education have often emphasized collective loyalty to the Party rather than individual virtue or universal ethics. When people grow up without strong reinforcement of personal responsibility, public behavior can suffer. By comparison, overseas Chinese communities—in Taiwan, Singapore, Hong Kong’s earlier era, and diaspora populations worldwide—have largely preserved traditional values. Emphasis on education, family cohesion, hard work, and courteous conduct remains prominent. Many excel in business and academia precisely because these cultural strengths were not uprooted by the same ideological campaigns. Their reputation for civility and reliability often stands in positive contrast to reports from the mainland. Japan demonstrates what is possible when a culture actively nurtures discipline and respect across generations. Its success is not accidental but the product of consistent education and societal norms that survived modernization. China’s challenges with public conduct in some contexts stem less from the people themselves than from governance that disrupted the transmission of civilizational values. Restoring emphasis on traditional ethics—personal accountability, respect for others, and care for shared environments—could help bridge the gap, regardless of political system. The Japanese example offers a clear lesson: civilization is not inherited automatically. It must be taught, practiced, and protected. When ideology supplants tradition, the human cost appears in everyday manners and public spaces. When culture is preserved, the results speak for themselves through quiet acts like cleaning up after oneself. The choice between these paths remains one of the most important facing any society.

Aric Chen

173,587 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

A 29-year-old man was arrested in this district for allegedly killing his wife, suspecting her of having an extramarital affair, police said on Tuesday. He apparently filmed the victim's final moments while she was hanging from a noose. The woman, identified as Bhagyashree Jigalur (23), was found dead at the couple's house in Galagali village in Bilagi taluk on Monday evening, they said. Police registered a murder case against the deceased woman's husband, Praveen Ashok Jigalur, based on a complaint filed by her father. He has been arrested on murder charges, police said. According to police, the accused allegedly filmed his wife in her final moments while she was hanging from the noose, with the video purportedly showing her struggling, and later circulated it to several people, including her family members. However, investigators are yet to determine whether the woman was assaulted and then hanged or whether she died by hanging after an assault, since there were blood injuries found on her body. Around 5:30 pm, the accused called the victim's father and informed him that she had died. Preliminary investigation suggested that the accused suspected his wife of having an illicit relationship with another man. Police have recovered videos allegedly found on the woman's mobile phone, as well as those recorded by the accused after the incident. "The accused shared those videos with the woman's father, family members and some friends. We have recovered those videos," Bagalkot Superintendent of Police Siddharth Goyal said. According to the SP, the videos allegedly showing the affair were found on the wife's phone by the accused, who copied those videos to his own phone and shared them with some of his friends. "We have seized the husband's mobile phone. During its examination, we found videos that allegedly led him to suspect his wife was having an extramarital affair. We are examining those videos to determine the circumstances that led to the crime," he said. The SP added that even the victim's family had acknowledged they were aware of the alleged affair. Responding to reports that the accused may have made a video call to the man with whom his wife allegedly had the affair and showed him what had happened, Goyal said: "We have to verify that. We have seized the phone and sent it for data extraction. We will examine the call records, the data available on the device, and recover any deleted data, if possible." Police said the couple married in 2020 and lived together for about four years. They have a three-year-old son. According to the preliminary investigation, while the husband was working as a driver and travelling frequently over the past two years, the woman allegedly developed a relationship with another man from the area where her parental home is located. The alleged affair led to frequent disputes between the couple, police said. The woman had been staying at her parents' house for the last one-and-a-half months. Investigators are also looking into her alleged complaints that her husband was not taking proper care of her. According to the SP, on Monday, the accused allegedly went to his in-laws' house and brought his wife back to their home. The two were alone when the incident happened. Police said blood injuries were found on the woman's body and an iron rod-like weapon has been recovered. Officers have also collected evidence from the crime scene for forensic examination. "The post-mortem examination will clarify the nature of the injuries on the neck. We are also examining whether she was given any intoxicating substance. Stomach contents have been preserved and sent to the Forensic Science Laboratory for analysis," the officer said. Beer bottles were also found at the scene and police are examining whether the woman had been made to consume alcohol. "There are blood injuries on the woman's body, and the accused appeared to harbour resentment towards her. Instead of attempting to save her, he recorded videos and immediately shared them with several people. The exact sequence of events will be established after a detailed investigation," he said. Police said they would seek the accused's custody to verify the authenticity and timing of the videos recovered from the woman's phone, question witnesses and examine whether village panchayat meetings had earlier been held over the couple's marital disputes. Further investigation is underway.
2:34

A 29-year-old man was arrested in this district for allegedly killing his wife, suspecting her of having an extramarital affair, police said on Tuesday. He apparently filmed the victim's final moments while she was hanging from a noose. The woman, identified as Bhagyashree Jigalur (23), was found dead at the couple's house in Galagali village in Bilagi taluk on Monday evening, they said. Police registered a murder case against the deceased woman's husband, Praveen Ashok Jigalur, based on a complaint filed by her father. He has been arrested on murder charges, police said. According to police, the accused allegedly filmed his wife in her final moments while she was hanging from the noose, with the video purportedly showing her struggling, and later circulated it to several people, including her family members. However, investigators are yet to determine whether the woman was assaulted and then hanged or whether she died by hanging after an assault, since there were blood injuries found on her body. Around 5:30 pm, the accused called the victim's father and informed him that she had died. Preliminary investigation suggested that the accused suspected his wife of having an illicit relationship with another man. Police have recovered videos allegedly found on the woman's mobile phone, as well as those recorded by the accused after the incident. "The accused shared those videos with the woman's father, family members and some friends. We have recovered those videos," Bagalkot Superintendent of Police Siddharth Goyal said. According to the SP, the videos allegedly showing the affair were found on the wife's phone by the accused, who copied those videos to his own phone and shared them with some of his friends. "We have seized the husband's mobile phone. During its examination, we found videos that allegedly led him to suspect his wife was having an extramarital affair. We are examining those videos to determine the circumstances that led to the crime," he said. The SP added that even the victim's family had acknowledged they were aware of the alleged affair. Responding to reports that the accused may have made a video call to the man with whom his wife allegedly had the affair and showed him what had happened, Goyal said: "We have to verify that. We have seized the phone and sent it for data extraction. We will examine the call records, the data available on the device, and recover any deleted data, if possible." Police said the couple married in 2020 and lived together for about four years. They have a three-year-old son. According to the preliminary investigation, while the husband was working as a driver and travelling frequently over the past two years, the woman allegedly developed a relationship with another man from the area where her parental home is located. The alleged affair led to frequent disputes between the couple, police said. The woman had been staying at her parents' house for the last one-and-a-half months. Investigators are also looking into her alleged complaints that her husband was not taking proper care of her. According to the SP, on Monday, the accused allegedly went to his in-laws' house and brought his wife back to their home. The two were alone when the incident happened. Police said blood injuries were found on the woman's body and an iron rod-like weapon has been recovered. Officers have also collected evidence from the crime scene for forensic examination. "The post-mortem examination will clarify the nature of the injuries on the neck. We are also examining whether she was given any intoxicating substance. Stomach contents have been preserved and sent to the Forensic Science Laboratory for analysis," the officer said. Beer bottles were also found at the scene and police are examining whether the woman had been made to consume alcohol. "There are blood injuries on the woman's body, and the accused appeared to harbour resentment towards her. Instead of attempting to save her, he recorded videos and immediately shared them with several people. The exact sequence of events will be established after a detailed investigation," he said. Police said they would seek the accused's custody to verify the authenticity and timing of the videos recovered from the woman's phone, question witnesses and examine whether village panchayat meetings had earlier been held over the couple's marital disputes. Further investigation is underway.

Hate Detector 🔍

78,304 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

🚨BREAKING: One of the most chilling alien abductions in American history resurfaces in light of the Pentagon’s UFO disclosures. These reports indicate the Alien/Non-Human presence on earth goes well beyond what the government just revealed🚨 Jim Weiner, Charlie Foltz go public again about their intense experience: an 80-foot glowing sphere chased them across a lake in the Maine wilderness in August 1976 while they were on a fishing trip. They were taken aboard the UFO and six grey beings under five feet tall conducted forced medical examinations, extracting biological samples from each man and placing devices on their shins leaving permanent bald patches and benign tumors at the sites of entry. The Experiencers: Jim Weiner, Charlie Foltz, Chuck Rak and Jim's identical twin brother Jack are at the center of the most rigorously documented abduction case in American history. The case has been investigated for nearly fifty years by Raymond Fowler and reviewed by the late Dr. John Mack of Harvard, who tested all four men and found no underlying psychiatric pathology in any of them. The UFO: The craft was the size of a two-and-a-half story house, completely silent, with a halo and a roiling plasma surface. It responded directly to Charlie's SOS flashlight signal from 75 yards away, accelerated faster than the speed of sound with no sonic boom, and emitted a hollow tube of blue light that came down around their canoe. The next conscious memory all three men have is standing on the shore. Three hours had elapsed. The bonfire they had built to last three hours had burned to almost nothing. Corroboration: Ray Fowler conducted independent hypnotic regression sessions with each man over roughly a year, instructing them not to compare notes or read about the subject during the investigation. All four accounts converged on the same craft, beings, examination room, and procedures. Six grey beings, four-fingered hands with all four digits opposable, no nose, slit for a mouth, examined them on a table under a focused blue light. Sperm was extracted from each. Jim's bald patches are still there. Jack's tumor tissue was sent to Air Force pathology and could not be identified. John Mack — who built the modern psychiatric framework for evaluating experiencers while at Harvard — knew them personally for over twenty years and found no underlying psychiatric pathology in any of them. A Lockheed “Neuro-engineer” was there: Years later the men met John Norseen, a Lockheed scientist behind U.S. patents on brain biometrics. He told them he was at the Allagash in August 1976 running a covert tracking exercise and was the first to read their UFO report to the rangers. Weeks before his death he emailed Jim with a cryptic sign-off. He was found dead in a hotel room two weeks later. Loring Nuclear Base Was 90 Miles Away: Loring Air Force Base — a nuclear weapons storage facility in northern Maine — experienced documented craft incursions in 1975 and 1976, with objects hovering over warhead bunkers emitting laser-like beams. Eagle Lake sits roughly 90 miles away. Both events fall within the same timeframe. Why It Still Holds Up: Nearly fifty years later, the Allagash case remains unusual because it isn't built on memory alone — it has biology in it. Physical tissue from one witness passed through military pathology and could not be identified. The bald patches on Jim Weiner's shins are still there. Full episode is live now.
2:27

🚨BREAKING: One of the most chilling alien abductions in American history resurfaces in light of the Pentagon’s UFO disclosures. These reports indicate the Alien/Non-Human presence on earth goes well beyond what the government just revealed🚨 Jim Weiner, Charlie Foltz go public again about their intense experience: an 80-foot glowing sphere chased them across a lake in the Maine wilderness in August 1976 while they were on a fishing trip. They were taken aboard the UFO and six grey beings under five feet tall conducted forced medical examinations, extracting biological samples from each man and placing devices on their shins leaving permanent bald patches and benign tumors at the sites of entry. The Experiencers: Jim Weiner, Charlie Foltz, Chuck Rak and Jim's identical twin brother Jack are at the center of the most rigorously documented abduction case in American history. The case has been investigated for nearly fifty years by Raymond Fowler and reviewed by the late Dr. John Mack of Harvard, who tested all four men and found no underlying psychiatric pathology in any of them. The UFO: The craft was the size of a two-and-a-half story house, completely silent, with a halo and a roiling plasma surface. It responded directly to Charlie's SOS flashlight signal from 75 yards away, accelerated faster than the speed of sound with no sonic boom, and emitted a hollow tube of blue light that came down around their canoe. The next conscious memory all three men have is standing on the shore. Three hours had elapsed. The bonfire they had built to last three hours had burned to almost nothing. Corroboration: Ray Fowler conducted independent hypnotic regression sessions with each man over roughly a year, instructing them not to compare notes or read about the subject during the investigation. All four accounts converged on the same craft, beings, examination room, and procedures. Six grey beings, four-fingered hands with all four digits opposable, no nose, slit for a mouth, examined them on a table under a focused blue light. Sperm was extracted from each. Jim's bald patches are still there. Jack's tumor tissue was sent to Air Force pathology and could not be identified. John Mack — who built the modern psychiatric framework for evaluating experiencers while at Harvard — knew them personally for over twenty years and found no underlying psychiatric pathology in any of them. A Lockheed “Neuro-engineer” was there: Years later the men met John Norseen, a Lockheed scientist behind U.S. patents on brain biometrics. He told them he was at the Allagash in August 1976 running a covert tracking exercise and was the first to read their UFO report to the rangers. Weeks before his death he emailed Jim with a cryptic sign-off. He was found dead in a hotel room two weeks later. Loring Nuclear Base Was 90 Miles Away: Loring Air Force Base — a nuclear weapons storage facility in northern Maine — experienced documented craft incursions in 1975 and 1976, with objects hovering over warhead bunkers emitting laser-like beams. Eagle Lake sits roughly 90 miles away. Both events fall within the same timeframe. Why It Still Holds Up: Nearly fifty years later, the Allagash case remains unusual because it isn't built on memory alone — it has biology in it. Physical tissue from one witness passed through military pathology and could not be identified. The bald patches on Jim Weiner's shins are still there. Full episode is live now.

Jesse Michels

258,140 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

The RFK assassination breakdown and the intelligence operation cover-up. Robert Kennedy's assassination has so many holes in it and is looking very similar to JFK's assassination from the patsy fall guy play, right down to the CIA and Mossad connections. Even with a touch of Mk Ultra to top it off. Now that the JFK files concluded what we all have known from the start, especially with the CIA's specific request to redact and not release any and all information or mentions of the Israeli Intelligence service (The Mossad), will the Robert Kennedy assassination declassification solidify a similar story with the same suspects and sensitivity as the JFK declassified files? Let's dive in to what makes this story just as obvious and as well coordinated of an intelligence operation with the same fall guy technique as JFK. Robert Kennedy (Bobby) was an American politician who served as the 64th U.S. State Attorney General from Jan. 1961 - Sept. 1964, and as a U.S. Senator from New York from Jan. 1965 until he was assassinated in Los Angeles in the kitchen of the Ambassador Hotel after winning the South Dakota Presidential primaries on June 5, 1968. The alleged killer was Sirhan Sirhan according to "official" reports, but after years of putting the pieces together as information was found, Sirhan Sirhan was not the only gunman in the kitchen at the Ambassador Hotel. Not only was there other players involved that set up the initial assassination, but were also there to make sure the plans went down but to make sure that Robert was directed into that kitchen that day where he was tragically gunned down. Sirhan's stories never added up after the crime was officially pinned on him with his stories constantly changing and another important aspect is the connection that Sirhan took part in a "medical experiment" while in college that was later found to be connected to Mk Ultra. Was this the beginning of the creation of a "patsy" assassin? Was this part of the plan all along or a fail safe in the assassination? The reason this comes into play with a planned intelligence operation between the CIA and Mossad are the same connections that JFK had with the CIA and Mossad and interfering with the mafia and other countries like Israel registering AIPAC as a foreign entity and other illegal operations and their hold on American politics through Congress and other political figures. The smoking gun to this comes down to the autopsy report and the total amount of rounds that were recovered and the overall trajectories of the rounds and the final kill shot that finished the hit on RFK. The amount of rounds recovered kept changing through the LA police investigations findings which also didn't help or make the LA police look to good and even pointed to some foul play and cooperation in the cover up. The revolver used by Sirhan held 7 shots, which all shots were accounted for along with their targets. LA police identified 7, then 10, then 13? Sirhan was also in front of RFK the whole time which would go against the final autopsy report which showed that four shots hit RFK from the back side at an extremely close range which also left marks on RFK's flesh because of the close proximity of the guns barrel to RFK with the final kill shot being directly behind RFK's head, behind the ear. These findings would make it impossible for Sirhan to be the actual killer being always in front of RFK and with 77 witnesses to verify the claim. The theory goes from the actual footage from the event right before it unfolded that after his speech he was supposed to exit the stage and go towards a band that was playing, but was abruptly blocked and forced into the kitchen where the actual would be assassin was, who then came up behind RFK named Thane Eugene Cesar, a security guard who worked for Lockheed Martin and a CIA contracted operative. This is when at the same time Sirhan drew his gun, shot twice towards RFK from the front and then Sirhan's gun was pointed away from RFK and shot the remaining rounds away from RFK because he was being wrestled with the gun in his hand, which all of the shots were accounted for and the people they ended up hitting. The person who blocked RKF from exiting the stage after his speech was Frank Mankiewicz, an anti defamation league spy, operating on behalf of the Israeli Mossad, who had infiltrated Robert's campaign, under the cover of being his press secretary, in order to get close to RFK in order for the operation to go as planned to takeout RFK. Mankiewicz turns RFK around instead of exiting the stage like he was supposed to and planned to in the first place, blocked and pointed for him to enter the kitchen where a team of assassins were waiting to ambush and assassinate RFK. Frank Mankiewicz was ADL and Israeli Mossad assassination coordinator and was there to make sure RFK entered that kitchen no matter what and that nothing would get in the way. Sirhan was the fall guy who was going to kill RFK but was ultimately there to cover for the actual assassins from the Mossad and the CIA. Just like the JFK assassination. Are you noticing a pattern? Do you see how they operate? This seems to be the pattern. Find a radical or create a radical assassin through MK Ultra techniques, set up an assassination by a real hit squad, "The Las Vegas Shooting," have the Mk Ultra victim attempt to carry something out to pull away from the involvement of intelligence operations by pinning it on the lone, crazy, gunman theory, walk away with another successful intelligence assassination operation while it's pinned on the MK Ultra fall guy. To this day RFK Jr. does not believe that Sirhan Sirhan killed his father RFK, especially after the autopsy report finding which prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that it's impossible. What will the RFK documents prove when they're finally released? How many more assassins were created or other "gunman" of other crimes were part of MK Ultra experiments? The proof of well organized intelligence operations are becoming clearer by the day. There are no coincidences.
15:22

The RFK assassination breakdown and the intelligence operation cover-up. Robert Kennedy's assassination has so many holes in it and is looking very similar to JFK's assassination from the patsy fall guy play, right down to the CIA and Mossad connections. Even with a touch of Mk Ultra to top it off. Now that the JFK files concluded what we all have known from the start, especially with the CIA's specific request to redact and not release any and all information or mentions of the Israeli Intelligence service (The Mossad), will the Robert Kennedy assassination declassification solidify a similar story with the same suspects and sensitivity as the JFK declassified files? Let's dive in to what makes this story just as obvious and as well coordinated of an intelligence operation with the same fall guy technique as JFK. Robert Kennedy (Bobby) was an American politician who served as the 64th U.S. State Attorney General from Jan. 1961 - Sept. 1964, and as a U.S. Senator from New York from Jan. 1965 until he was assassinated in Los Angeles in the kitchen of the Ambassador Hotel after winning the South Dakota Presidential primaries on June 5, 1968. The alleged killer was Sirhan Sirhan according to "official" reports, but after years of putting the pieces together as information was found, Sirhan Sirhan was not the only gunman in the kitchen at the Ambassador Hotel. Not only was there other players involved that set up the initial assassination, but were also there to make sure the plans went down but to make sure that Robert was directed into that kitchen that day where he was tragically gunned down. Sirhan's stories never added up after the crime was officially pinned on him with his stories constantly changing and another important aspect is the connection that Sirhan took part in a "medical experiment" while in college that was later found to be connected to Mk Ultra. Was this the beginning of the creation of a "patsy" assassin? Was this part of the plan all along or a fail safe in the assassination? The reason this comes into play with a planned intelligence operation between the CIA and Mossad are the same connections that JFK had with the CIA and Mossad and interfering with the mafia and other countries like Israel registering AIPAC as a foreign entity and other illegal operations and their hold on American politics through Congress and other political figures. The smoking gun to this comes down to the autopsy report and the total amount of rounds that were recovered and the overall trajectories of the rounds and the final kill shot that finished the hit on RFK. The amount of rounds recovered kept changing through the LA police investigations findings which also didn't help or make the LA police look to good and even pointed to some foul play and cooperation in the cover up. The revolver used by Sirhan held 7 shots, which all shots were accounted for along with their targets. LA police identified 7, then 10, then 13? Sirhan was also in front of RFK the whole time which would go against the final autopsy report which showed that four shots hit RFK from the back side at an extremely close range which also left marks on RFK's flesh because of the close proximity of the guns barrel to RFK with the final kill shot being directly behind RFK's head, behind the ear. These findings would make it impossible for Sirhan to be the actual killer being always in front of RFK and with 77 witnesses to verify the claim. The theory goes from the actual footage from the event right before it unfolded that after his speech he was supposed to exit the stage and go towards a band that was playing, but was abruptly blocked and forced into the kitchen where the actual would be assassin was, who then came up behind RFK named Thane Eugene Cesar, a security guard who worked for Lockheed Martin and a CIA contracted operative. This is when at the same time Sirhan drew his gun, shot twice towards RFK from the front and then Sirhan's gun was pointed away from RFK and shot the remaining rounds away from RFK because he was being wrestled with the gun in his hand, which all of the shots were accounted for and the people they ended up hitting. The person who blocked RKF from exiting the stage after his speech was Frank Mankiewicz, an anti defamation league spy, operating on behalf of the Israeli Mossad, who had infiltrated Robert's campaign, under the cover of being his press secretary, in order to get close to RFK in order for the operation to go as planned to takeout RFK. Mankiewicz turns RFK around instead of exiting the stage like he was supposed to and planned to in the first place, blocked and pointed for him to enter the kitchen where a team of assassins were waiting to ambush and assassinate RFK. Frank Mankiewicz was ADL and Israeli Mossad assassination coordinator and was there to make sure RFK entered that kitchen no matter what and that nothing would get in the way. Sirhan was the fall guy who was going to kill RFK but was ultimately there to cover for the actual assassins from the Mossad and the CIA. Just like the JFK assassination. Are you noticing a pattern? Do you see how they operate? This seems to be the pattern. Find a radical or create a radical assassin through MK Ultra techniques, set up an assassination by a real hit squad, "The Las Vegas Shooting," have the Mk Ultra victim attempt to carry something out to pull away from the involvement of intelligence operations by pinning it on the lone, crazy, gunman theory, walk away with another successful intelligence assassination operation while it's pinned on the MK Ultra fall guy. To this day RFK Jr. does not believe that Sirhan Sirhan killed his father RFK, especially after the autopsy report finding which prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that it's impossible. What will the RFK documents prove when they're finally released? How many more assassins were created or other "gunman" of other crimes were part of MK Ultra experiments? The proof of well organized intelligence operations are becoming clearer by the day. There are no coincidences.

The SCIF

44,352 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

RUSSELL T. DAVIES IS HOIST BY HIS OWN PERTARDIS IN CASUAL COMMENT ON KIDS “As if people care remotely for the lives of children, in any shape or form…” Davies believes false concern for child safety is being used to beat LGBTQ+ around the ideological grooming and transing of children. Leading to “Hate”, Davies predicts, “that will lead to a hanging” — as he depicts in Tip Toe. Davies’ conceit with Tip Toe is to persuade the audience to sympathise with Leo, who is drawn into conflict with his straight neighbour and family, including the teenage son. His immaturity attracts him to 16-year-old George, and to lust after men decades younger than himself throughout the series. (Davies, incidentally, is 63 and dating a 27-year-old who’s a dead ringer for 15-year-old schoolboy Nathan in Queer as Folk…) In this excerpt from a video posted to YouTube on 4 June, Davies is bemused that anyone could be remotely concerned for children’s lives. To him, anyone who suggests puberty blockers are dangerous, that kids are too young to consent to medical procedures, or are being ideologically groomed by LGBTQ+ activists at school and on TV must, therefore, be politically motivated. Not unlike the contemptuous response of politicians towards those who speak up for rape gang victims, or the attempted beheading of a man in Belfast, reported as a “minor incident” by the BBC. Their response is always to blame Nigel Farage, or to attack Elon Musk and anyone who wants to talk about it. Similarly, Davies’ response to those who call out the ideological grooming and transing of children is to… attack Elon Musk and call for X to be shut down. Davies runs an account on Instagram which he is able to control, word for word, yet rages against the one platform he can’t: “X is a hate platform owned by a megalomaniac who is pushing ill on many of us!” he fumed recently. Yet it was X that exposed the UK rape gangs scandal globally and the horrific murder of Harry Nowak, and pushed for the bodycam footage to be released — without which Harry would likely have been forever remembered as a racist rather than a victim of the worst example of DEI; the new religion of the left which Davies, the BBC and the left bow down to. Davies’ visceral hatred of X was no doubt amplified when the US ‘WPATH – The World Professional Association for Transgender Health – Files’ and UK’s own Cass Report into NHS England gender identity services for children and young people were published in March and April 2024 respectively — a month before the global premiere of Ncuti Gatwa’s first globally streamed season of Doctor Who on Disney+. It was revealed in November 2025 that LGBTQ+ activists within the BBC and other international news organisations like CNN censored coverage of the WPATH Files entirely, despite its information being used by institutions globally, including the NHS. So for millions, X was the only platform they could turn to for truth when the story broke; namely, that the WPATH’s internal messaging boards leaked by a whistleblower exposed its members doubting their own guidance that was demonstrably ruining many lives, not least children fast-tracked at a furious pace for puberty blockers and surgery. Davies is himself an outspoken advocate for dispensing puberty blockers for children. Having been a champion for LGB rights for many years, he became one of the trans movement’s most outspoken activists some 15 years ago when he aligned to the LGBTQ+ acronym. “To cut out the T is to kill!” he said in 2021. The backlash against the damning disclosures — proving conclusively that gender-confused children were being medically, emotionally and physically harmed by the zeal of the trans lobby to place them on a pathway of irreversible medical procedures — came at a critical juncture for Davies; a point when the LGBTQ+ movement appeared to be nearing an irreversible level of dominance throughout western society. They helped to derail the LGBTQ+ globalist utopia Davies was actively participating in working toward and his rainbow makeover of Doctor Who was a monumental flop globally, spectacularly failing to entice the new child audience Davies so craved through his “open door” of diversity replete with trans teens, drag queens — even the Doctor himself cruising for gay sex. During promotion for the 60th anniversary specials and Gatwa’s first season Davies is on record saying: “This is my world… Why wouldn’t I want to write about it?” “What you call diversity I call an open door.” “The messaging’s for the kids… We’ve got to get them while they’re young!” Only someone lacking the ability to marvel at a child’s innocence — who casually states they can’t comprehend how anyone could “care remotely for the lives of children in any way, shape or form” — would ask for sympathy for a character like Leo, who lived life on the edge, fucked around with abandon, and whose immature lust for youth clearly, like Stuart in Queer as Folk, had no fixed demarcation point. “16 is the legal age of consent," Davies makes a point of slipping into his Tip Toe script. Off camera: Yes, but if he looks 16 and is really 15, 14…” My Tip Toe review below ⬇️
0:50

RUSSELL T. DAVIES IS HOIST BY HIS OWN PERTARDIS IN CASUAL COMMENT ON KIDS “As if people care remotely for the lives of children, in any shape or form…” Davies believes false concern for child safety is being used to beat LGBTQ+ around the ideological grooming and transing of children. Leading to “Hate”, Davies predicts, “that will lead to a hanging” — as he depicts in Tip Toe. Davies’ conceit with Tip Toe is to persuade the audience to sympathise with Leo, who is drawn into conflict with his straight neighbour and family, including the teenage son. His immaturity attracts him to 16-year-old George, and to lust after men decades younger than himself throughout the series. (Davies, incidentally, is 63 and dating a 27-year-old who’s a dead ringer for 15-year-old schoolboy Nathan in Queer as Folk…) In this excerpt from a video posted to YouTube on 4 June, Davies is bemused that anyone could be remotely concerned for children’s lives. To him, anyone who suggests puberty blockers are dangerous, that kids are too young to consent to medical procedures, or are being ideologically groomed by LGBTQ+ activists at school and on TV must, therefore, be politically motivated. Not unlike the contemptuous response of politicians towards those who speak up for rape gang victims, or the attempted beheading of a man in Belfast, reported as a “minor incident” by the BBC. Their response is always to blame Nigel Farage, or to attack Elon Musk and anyone who wants to talk about it. Similarly, Davies’ response to those who call out the ideological grooming and transing of children is to… attack Elon Musk and call for X to be shut down. Davies runs an account on Instagram which he is able to control, word for word, yet rages against the one platform he can’t: “X is a hate platform owned by a megalomaniac who is pushing ill on many of us!” he fumed recently. Yet it was X that exposed the UK rape gangs scandal globally and the horrific murder of Harry Nowak, and pushed for the bodycam footage to be released — without which Harry would likely have been forever remembered as a racist rather than a victim of the worst example of DEI; the new religion of the left which Davies, the BBC and the left bow down to. Davies’ visceral hatred of X was no doubt amplified when the US ‘WPATH – The World Professional Association for Transgender Health – Files’ and UK’s own Cass Report into NHS England gender identity services for children and young people were published in March and April 2024 respectively — a month before the global premiere of Ncuti Gatwa’s first globally streamed season of Doctor Who on Disney+. It was revealed in November 2025 that LGBTQ+ activists within the BBC and other international news organisations like CNN censored coverage of the WPATH Files entirely, despite its information being used by institutions globally, including the NHS. So for millions, X was the only platform they could turn to for truth when the story broke; namely, that the WPATH’s internal messaging boards leaked by a whistleblower exposed its members doubting their own guidance that was demonstrably ruining many lives, not least children fast-tracked at a furious pace for puberty blockers and surgery. Davies is himself an outspoken advocate for dispensing puberty blockers for children. Having been a champion for LGB rights for many years, he became one of the trans movement’s most outspoken activists some 15 years ago when he aligned to the LGBTQ+ acronym. “To cut out the T is to kill!” he said in 2021. The backlash against the damning disclosures — proving conclusively that gender-confused children were being medically, emotionally and physically harmed by the zeal of the trans lobby to place them on a pathway of irreversible medical procedures — came at a critical juncture for Davies; a point when the LGBTQ+ movement appeared to be nearing an irreversible level of dominance throughout western society. They helped to derail the LGBTQ+ globalist utopia Davies was actively participating in working toward and his rainbow makeover of Doctor Who was a monumental flop globally, spectacularly failing to entice the new child audience Davies so craved through his “open door” of diversity replete with trans teens, drag queens — even the Doctor himself cruising for gay sex. During promotion for the 60th anniversary specials and Gatwa’s first season Davies is on record saying: “This is my world… Why wouldn’t I want to write about it?” “What you call diversity I call an open door.” “The messaging’s for the kids… We’ve got to get them while they’re young!” Only someone lacking the ability to marvel at a child’s innocence — who casually states they can’t comprehend how anyone could “care remotely for the lives of children in any way, shape or form” — would ask for sympathy for a character like Leo, who lived life on the edge, fucked around with abandon, and whose immature lust for youth clearly, like Stuart in Queer as Folk, had no fixed demarcation point. “16 is the legal age of consent," Davies makes a point of slipping into his Tip Toe script. Off camera: Yes, but if he looks 16 and is really 15, 14…” My Tip Toe review below ⬇️

Paul Clifton

60,733 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

BOOM!!! 💥💥💥 Dr. Aseem Malhotra's testimony was delivered in the Helsinski District Court on April 12, 2024, with the understanding that any deviation from the truth would constitute perjury. This clip was immediately banned by YouTube so please share widely. I've trimmed the clip, removing the interpreter's segment for a smoother listening experience. Here's the first hour of the testimony. ---------------------------------- My name is Doctor Aseem Malhotra. I am a consultant cardiologist. I've been a qualified doctor since 2001. I have held various roles both in academic health policy. In England, in the United Kingdom, and of the various roles, I won't bore you with all the details. I think three of the most relevant and prominent are the fact that I was an ambassador for the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges for six years, which represented every doctor in the UK. I served a full term of six years as a trustee of the King's fund. I was the youngest member to be appointed to this body which advises government on health policy. I was a founding member of Action on Sugar and a first science director. And through that role I'm considered the lead campaigner on bringing about a sugary drinks tax in the UK. And also, finally I served for five years as visiting professor of evidence based medicine at the Bahiana School of Medicine in Salvador, Brazil. In early 2020, at the beginning of the pandemic I was most vocal doctor on the mainstream, making the link very early on between COVID and those who are vulnerable to suffering serious complications from COVID In fact, in March 2020, I was asked to go on Sky News to explain my initial research findings of the link between especially obesity and COVID, but also to give people an opportunity and to suggest to the government this was a great time for them to implement public health policy to help people enhance or optimise their immune system, which could happen within just a few weeks of dietary changes and optimising vitamin D. This was later also backed up by medical journal publications a few months later. And I was first to mention on the back of an article I published in the Daily Telegraph newspaper, which became a front page commentary and was picked up by BBC News and Good Morning Britain, where I had said that it's likely our prime minister, Boris Johnson, was hospitalised because of his weight. As a result of that, the then secretary for health, Matt Hancock, and this was publicised in the news, had asked me to advise him on the link between COVID and obesity. ...before I explain my journey and in many ways U-turn on my understanding in terms of the benefits and harms of the COVID vaccine, my experience in this area over the last couple of years has made me realise more than ever that even for that the greatest barrier to the truth are not factual or intellectual barriers, but psychological. I think all of us as human beings are vulnerable to these psychological barriers and we should have compassion for ourselves. And I will just very briefly summarise those three psychological barriers before I get into my detailed account of what I was involved in in regards to the COVID vaccine. The first psychological barrier is one of fear. And many of us understandably, and I still remember from early on in the pandemic, we were all scared. We did not know what we were dealing with. The issue with fear is that when people and populations are in a state of fear, we are less likely to engage in critical thinking and we are more likely to be compliant. Although COVID was particularly devastating for vulnerable groups in the elderly and I even have managed and still manage people with long COVID, the fear was grossly exaggerated. And one of the examples of that is that when we had good information on the mortality rate of COVID in the United States, one survey in 2020 revealed that 50% of Americans believed that if they caught COVID, the risk of 19 hospitalisation was 50% one and two, when the actual figure, certainly an average for people in middle age, was less than 1%. The second barrier to the truth, which I think is very relevant to the situation we find ourselves in now, is one called willful blindness. This is when human beings, all of us, are vulnerable to this, turn a blind eye to the truth in order to feel safe, avoid conflict, reduce anxiety and to protect prestige and fragile egos. Some examples of this include, on a personal level, willful blindness can occur when a spouse turns a blind eye to the affair of their partner. On an institutional level, some great examples of willful blindness include Hollywood and Harvey Weinstein, the Catholic Church and child molestation. I believe the current situation we find ourselves in, with much of the mainstream narrative and the medical establishment and policy makers not acknowledging quite horrific, serious and common harms from this vaccine, is another example of willful blindness. And I also say this with full empathy, because I was one of those people that was for a very long time, willfully blind to the harms of the COVID vaccine. In January 2021, I was one of the first people to take two doses of the COVID mRNA vaccine because I volunteered in a vaccine centre. I still believe that traditional vaccines are some of the safest amongst all pharmacological interventions in medicine and I could not conceive of any possibility whatsoever of this vaccine causing harm. As a public figure and respected doctor in the UK, I have built relationships across the board with many other public figures, including celebrities and politicians, who often come to me for medical advice. One of those people was film director Gurinder Chadha, who you may be familiar with some of her work, including the movie "Bend It like Beckham", who had asked me whether or not she should take the vaccine and had sent me blogs which I dismissed and regarded as anti vax nonsense. I was then asked to go on good morning, Britain because Gurinder Chadha, the director herself tweeted that I had convinced her to take the vaccine. The main reason for this TV appearance was to help tackle vaccine hesitancy, which was very prominent amongst people from ethnic minority groups in the UK. I made the point on that programme that I understand where vaccine hesitancy was coming from because of the history that I have been involved with over many years in highlighting the shortcomings of pharmaceutical industry influence over medicine. And I even made the point, if I remember correctly, that they have been found guilty of fraud on many occasions, that the third most common cause of death, prepandemic after heart disease and cancer, is prescribed medications. I, however, reassured the public and said that despite these figures, of everything we do in medicine, traditional vaccinations are amongst the safest. I still believe this to be the case. A few months later, in April 2021, I met with a colleague and friend of mine who I regard as one of the brightest cardiologists in the United Kingdom. I was surprised when he told me that he had not taken the COVID vaccine. He explained to me that he had concerns because he had seen in the supplementary appendix of Pfizer's original trial that there were four cardiac arrests in the vaccine group and only one in the placebo. These numbers were small and did not reach statistical significance. So this could be random chance, or his concern was it could represent a signal of problems in the future. And if this was the case, we are going to have a huge problem. He said he'd rather wait and see what happens before taking the vaccine. On July 26, 2021, my father, aged 73, who was a very prominent, well known doctor in the UK, including being the honorary vice president of the British Medical Association and had received honours from the Queen of England with an OBE, suffered an unexpected sudden cardiac arrest. I was particularly devastated by this happening and I was also I find it difficult to understand why my father, who was a fit and well man, I knew his cardiac history and his cardiac status, would suffer a cardiac arrest. But also my initial investigation was to try and understand why there had been a 30 minutes ambulance delay arriving to his apartment. Two weeks later, the deputy chief nurse of NHS England, a government health body, called me up. She was very upset, she knew my father very well and she was crying and she told me, Aseem, there's something I need to tell you. She in effect told me that throughout the country, for the last two months prior to my father's cardiac arrest in most regions of the UK, ambulances were not getting to patients in time for heart attacks and cardiac arrests. And there had been a deliberate, and I will use these words because I mentioned it, I've mentioned it before, a cover up involving the government and the Department of Health to withhold this information from doctors and the public. I worked with an investigative journalist with the I newspaper in the UK to write an article and a news story that became BBC News headlines a few months later, exposing this. Just before I exposed this, I messaged a professor of cardiology who I trust in the UK. He has a leadership role to explain to him what had happened and what I was about to do. I have text message evidence of this. He told me not to do this because it would make me enemies. I explained to him that I had a duty to patients and the public. I'm highlighting this as one example and I'll give you more examples of a cultural problem within medicine. The next part of this story is the post mortem findings of my father. They did not make any sense to me. I am considered a leading expert, maybe in the world, on the development and progression of coronary artery disease. My father had two severe blockages in his coronary arteries. There was no actual evidence of heart attack and likely there was a rhythm disturbance because of reduced blood supply that led to his cardiac arrest. Then in, within the space of a few weeks, around October and November, 3, different sources of information was brought to my attention that made me realise that there was probably a significant problem with the COVID mRNA vaccine. The first in October 2021. I remember I was giving lectures in Stockholm. I was contacted by a journalist with a Times newspaper who reported to me and said, Dr Malhotra, we have reports of an unexplained 25% increase in heart attacks in hospitals in Scotland and asked me what I thought was going on. I explained to her that at that time, with the evidence I knew in my own experience, I said that two likely contributory factors were lockdown stress. We know that when populations undergo severe stress after war, for example, there is an increase in heart attacks and strokes that can last for many years. She asked me whether I thought that there was a contribution. I was surprised when she asked me whether I thought there may be a contribution of the COVID vaccine to these heart attacks. I said to her, a good scientist should never exclude any possibility. But I felt at the time it was unlikely to be related to the COVID vaccine. But we should watch this space and keep our eyes open. A few weeks later, a publication appeared in the Journal Circulation, which is considered the highest impact cardiology journal in the United States that revealed a potentially very strong link between the COVID mRNA vaccines and acceleration in heart attack risk. Very specifically, in several hundred people of middle age, there was a plausible mechanism, by use of inflammatory markers in the blood, that increased the baseline risk of those people having a heart attack in five years, from 11% to 25%, just within two months of having the COVID mRNA vaccines. Of course, this is one bit of data, but even if partially true, that is a huge increase in risk in a very short space of time. And for me now made me think and link back to why my father may have suffered a cardiac arrest six months after having two doses of the vaccine. I remember thinking and speaking to a colleague, that if this was true, then we were going to see an increase in cardiac arrests, heart attacks and excess deaths in heavily vaccinated countries for the next few years. Then within a few weeks, I was called up by a whistleblower at a very prestigious british institution. I will name that institution, which I have not done publicly before as a University of Oxford. This cardiologist explained to me that a group of researchers in his department had accidentally found, through the use of very specialised imaging of the heart, that there was a signal of increased inflammation of the heart arteries, which was there in the vaccinated, but not there in the unvaccinated. The lead researcher of that group had sat down, the juniors, and had said that we are not going to explore these findings any further because it may affect our funding from the pharmaceutical industry. At that point, with these three bits of information, I then felt it was my ethical duty to speak out. And I went on GBNews to talk about what I'd found what I'd heard and I'd asked for the Vaccine Committee of the UK on TV to investigate this, to see whether there was a real problem with the vaccine in relation to heart issues. Around the same time which I found very strange is that the Secretary of State for Health at that stage, who was not Matt Hancock, was Sajid Javid, had announced in parliament that we are going to introduce legislation to ensure that all healthcare workers are mandated to have the COVID vaccine. For me, this, by that stage had no ethical or scientific justification, because certainly after the summer of 2021, it had become very apparent that the COVID mRNA vaccine was not stopping infection and it certainly was not stopping transmission. It was understood that approximately 80,000 NHS workers had refused at this stage to have the COVID vaccine. And now they were threatened with losing their job if by April the following year they had not been fully vaccinated. Many of these people were very concerned and contacted me around that time, I was also conducting many interviews, both through the BBC and Sky News and GBNews in regards to what happened with my father's ambulance delay. And I used it as an opportunity on the mainstream media to call for Sajid Javid, the secretary for health, to U-turn on the introduction of a mandate for healthcare workers based upon the fact that I felt it was not scientific and it was unethical. I also received my own personal backlash from these comments where I was contacted by the Royal College of Physicians who I had an affiliation with, and they asked me to respond to anonymous complaints from doctors that I was spreading, in quotes, antivax disinformation. I felt with my own knowledge and experience of the healthcare system that this was a direct response probably fueled by a combination of willful blindness and institutional corruption. To elaborate a bit further, when I say institutional corruption, I mean that my view was that the complaints were likely being fueled by academics with financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry. I felt very concerned about the potential introduction of the vaccine, well, the vaccine mandate. And therefore I decided there were two things that I decided to do. The first was I made a phone call to the chairman of the British Medical Association in December 2021. I had a good relationship with him and he respected my opinion. And I spent 2 hours on the phone explaining to him everything that I knew up to that stage about my concerns of the COVID mRNA vaccine. He said to me, "Aseem, nobody appears to critically appraise the evidence on the COVID mRNA vaccine as well as you have from our conversation, he said, most of my colleagues are getting their information on the benefits and harms of the vaccine from the BBC". This was replicated by the former chair of the CDC in the United States, Rochelle Walensky, who in an interview later on had said that her initial optimism of the vaccine benefits came from CNN News report. I say this just to emphasise that we should all accept our vulnerabilities to where we receive health information. Even doctors, policymakers, judges and lawyers are all influenced on the public massively by mainstream media. The chairman of the BMA also agreed with me. There was no ethical or scientific justification for mandating the COVID vaccine. He said the BMA also did not support it. And he said because of my conversation with him, he would speak directly to the secretary for health, Sajid Javid. One month later, at the end of January 2022, the COVID vaccine mandate for healthcare workers was overturned. I at that stage, given the fact that there was some backlash happening towards me, I realised that because this is a very big issue and area, and not my initial area of expertise, I needed to carry out my own critical analysis of the COVID mRNA vaccines. I spent six to nine months critically appraising the data, including speaking to two Pfizer whistleblowers, three investigative medical journalists and eminent scientists from the University of Oxford, Stanford and Harvard. The most critical bit, the most critical research that was published on this issue, which I think the whole court should acknowledge in August 2022, was published in the journal Vaccine. That research was conducted by some of the world's top independent of drug industry influence academics. That research, we was able to reanalyze the original randomised control trials conducted by Pfizer and Moderna. They were able to do this because new information was made available on the FDA's website and Health Canada's website. The conclusions of that paper were really very disturbing. The original trials that led to the drug regulatory approval of these vaccines revealed that you were more likely to suffer serious harm from taking the vaccine, specifically hospitalisation, life changing event or disability, than you were to be hospitalised with COVID That rate of harm at two months was very high at 1 in 800. Just to give you some perspective, historically we have suspended other vaccines for much less. In 1976, the swine flu vaccine was pulled because it was found to cause a neurological syndrome called Guillain-Barre syndrome In one in 100,000 people. In 1999, the rotavirus vaccine was suspended because it was found to cause a form of bowel obstruction in children affecting 1 in 10,000. This was 1 in 800. In my view, it was very clear that given this information, published in the highest impact Vaccine journal in the world, peer reviewed, and has not had any significant rebuttals, that this vaccine now, in my view, should never have been approved for use in a single human being in the first place. In my view, this very important court case in some ways, actually is a distraction from the much bigger issue, which is there should be court cases around the world with a full inquiry into the pharmaceutical industry and an inquiry as to how we got this so very wrong. Of course, one could argue this is just one bit of research, but actually, unfortunately, there are different, many different strands of research that are showing a signal of considerable and common serious harm from these vaccines. From pharmacovigilance data that is reporting what we call yellow card reports from the public. We have plausible biological mechanism of harm. We have other research called observational data. We have autopsy data also confirming that certainly with the majority of people who died within a short space of time of having the vaccine in relation to the heart, was definitively caused by the vaccine. This is really a very, very, very horrific situation we find ourselves in. One would hope and expect that the regulators should be independently evaluating all medications. But of course, the evidence reveals this is far from true. There was an investigation by the BMJ, also published in the summer of 2022, which revealed that most of the major regulators across the world were taking most of their money from the drug industry. For example, the MHRA in the UK receives 86% of its funding from the drug industry, and the FDA in America receives 65% of its funding from the drug industry, A fact that most doctors do not know. And therefore, I would not expect members of the court to know this either, is that very, very rarely do drug industry sponsored research get independently evaluated. Clinical trial data can often involve thousands of pages of information on individual patients. The drug companies hold onto that raw data. They then give summary results to the regulator, who are then paying, who have an incentive to approve the drugs, and the drugs are then approved. I made these points in my peer reviewed article published in the Journal of Insulin Resistance in September 2022, where I concluded that we should pause and investigate the issue around the COVID mRNA vaccines. I have since then been campaigning and advocating for a return to ethical evidence based medical practise around the world. Some of the clear solutions moving forward would be changes in the law that are required so that patients, doctors, members of the public can have greater confidence in the information they receive to make decisions about their health. Two very clear, low hanging fruit solutions, which are both ethical, scientific and democratic, would be that the drug industry should be allowed to develop drugs, but they shouldn't be allowed to test them themselves. And they certainly shouldn't be allowed to design their own research to and hold onto the raw data. Their information needs to be independently evaluated. One other clear solution would also be that the medical regulators, again, should not be taking any money from the industry, as this is a gross conflict of interest. I also want to highlight for people to understand the bigger picture. Prior to the pandemic, I had realised that there was a big problem with the reliability of clinical research, where invariably the results of clinical trials on all drugs sponsored by the drug industry, grossly exaggerate their safety and benefits. I have taken this information to the European Parliament, where I spoke in 2019, and I spoke to very senior politicians in the UK government. But although they were sympathetic, they felt that the issue was much bigger than them as individuals, and therefore it also needed media attention to get public awareness on the importance of such an inquiry. Before we continue with further questions, as I've been speaking for quite a long time now I'll just finish with two references just for the court and the judges to understand just how bad this problem is. Prepandemic the man who I call the Stephen Hawking of medicine is Professor John Ioannidis from the University of Stanford. The reason I call him the Stephen Hawking of Medicine is he's the most cited medical researcher in the world and is a mathematical genius. In 2006, he published a paper which was entitled why most published research findings are false. In that paper, he makes a point that the greater the financial interests in a given field, the less likely the research findings are to be true. I say this in context of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine which has made the company $100 billion. The other point that he makes in a further paper in 2017 is, again, the reason the system continues as it is is most doctors are unaware of the information they receive when they make clinical decisions has been corrupted by commercial influence. The other credible name I will mention is the editor of the Lancet, Richard Horton, who I personally know. In 2015, he wrote an article in the Lancet in relation to a secret meeting that had taken place with himself and some of the world's top medical academics. In that, he wrote that possibly half of the medical published literature may simply be untrue. And he said that science has taken a turn towards darkness. But who's going to take the first step to clean up the system? I believe in this case and in this court today, this is going to be a very pivotal potential moment in history for that first step. ---------------------- Dr Aseem Malhotra H/T: Tiina Keskimäki 🇫🇮
29:17

BOOM!!! 💥💥💥 Dr. Aseem Malhotra's testimony was delivered in the Helsinski District Court on April 12, 2024, with the understanding that any deviation from the truth would constitute perjury. This clip was immediately banned by YouTube so please share widely. I've trimmed the clip, removing the interpreter's segment for a smoother listening experience. Here's the first hour of the testimony. ---------------------------------- My name is Doctor Aseem Malhotra. I am a consultant cardiologist. I've been a qualified doctor since 2001. I have held various roles both in academic health policy. In England, in the United Kingdom, and of the various roles, I won't bore you with all the details. I think three of the most relevant and prominent are the fact that I was an ambassador for the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges for six years, which represented every doctor in the UK. I served a full term of six years as a trustee of the King's fund. I was the youngest member to be appointed to this body which advises government on health policy. I was a founding member of Action on Sugar and a first science director. And through that role I'm considered the lead campaigner on bringing about a sugary drinks tax in the UK. And also, finally I served for five years as visiting professor of evidence based medicine at the Bahiana School of Medicine in Salvador, Brazil. In early 2020, at the beginning of the pandemic I was most vocal doctor on the mainstream, making the link very early on between COVID and those who are vulnerable to suffering serious complications from COVID In fact, in March 2020, I was asked to go on Sky News to explain my initial research findings of the link between especially obesity and COVID, but also to give people an opportunity and to suggest to the government this was a great time for them to implement public health policy to help people enhance or optimise their immune system, which could happen within just a few weeks of dietary changes and optimising vitamin D. This was later also backed up by medical journal publications a few months later. And I was first to mention on the back of an article I published in the Daily Telegraph newspaper, which became a front page commentary and was picked up by BBC News and Good Morning Britain, where I had said that it's likely our prime minister, Boris Johnson, was hospitalised because of his weight. As a result of that, the then secretary for health, Matt Hancock, and this was publicised in the news, had asked me to advise him on the link between COVID and obesity. ...before I explain my journey and in many ways U-turn on my understanding in terms of the benefits and harms of the COVID vaccine, my experience in this area over the last couple of years has made me realise more than ever that even for that the greatest barrier to the truth are not factual or intellectual barriers, but psychological. I think all of us as human beings are vulnerable to these psychological barriers and we should have compassion for ourselves. And I will just very briefly summarise those three psychological barriers before I get into my detailed account of what I was involved in in regards to the COVID vaccine. The first psychological barrier is one of fear. And many of us understandably, and I still remember from early on in the pandemic, we were all scared. We did not know what we were dealing with. The issue with fear is that when people and populations are in a state of fear, we are less likely to engage in critical thinking and we are more likely to be compliant. Although COVID was particularly devastating for vulnerable groups in the elderly and I even have managed and still manage people with long COVID, the fear was grossly exaggerated. And one of the examples of that is that when we had good information on the mortality rate of COVID in the United States, one survey in 2020 revealed that 50% of Americans believed that if they caught COVID, the risk of 19 hospitalisation was 50% one and two, when the actual figure, certainly an average for people in middle age, was less than 1%. The second barrier to the truth, which I think is very relevant to the situation we find ourselves in now, is one called willful blindness. This is when human beings, all of us, are vulnerable to this, turn a blind eye to the truth in order to feel safe, avoid conflict, reduce anxiety and to protect prestige and fragile egos. Some examples of this include, on a personal level, willful blindness can occur when a spouse turns a blind eye to the affair of their partner. On an institutional level, some great examples of willful blindness include Hollywood and Harvey Weinstein, the Catholic Church and child molestation. I believe the current situation we find ourselves in, with much of the mainstream narrative and the medical establishment and policy makers not acknowledging quite horrific, serious and common harms from this vaccine, is another example of willful blindness. And I also say this with full empathy, because I was one of those people that was for a very long time, willfully blind to the harms of the COVID vaccine. In January 2021, I was one of the first people to take two doses of the COVID mRNA vaccine because I volunteered in a vaccine centre. I still believe that traditional vaccines are some of the safest amongst all pharmacological interventions in medicine and I could not conceive of any possibility whatsoever of this vaccine causing harm. As a public figure and respected doctor in the UK, I have built relationships across the board with many other public figures, including celebrities and politicians, who often come to me for medical advice. One of those people was film director Gurinder Chadha, who you may be familiar with some of her work, including the movie "Bend It like Beckham", who had asked me whether or not she should take the vaccine and had sent me blogs which I dismissed and regarded as anti vax nonsense. I was then asked to go on good morning, Britain because Gurinder Chadha, the director herself tweeted that I had convinced her to take the vaccine. The main reason for this TV appearance was to help tackle vaccine hesitancy, which was very prominent amongst people from ethnic minority groups in the UK. I made the point on that programme that I understand where vaccine hesitancy was coming from because of the history that I have been involved with over many years in highlighting the shortcomings of pharmaceutical industry influence over medicine. And I even made the point, if I remember correctly, that they have been found guilty of fraud on many occasions, that the third most common cause of death, prepandemic after heart disease and cancer, is prescribed medications. I, however, reassured the public and said that despite these figures, of everything we do in medicine, traditional vaccinations are amongst the safest. I still believe this to be the case. A few months later, in April 2021, I met with a colleague and friend of mine who I regard as one of the brightest cardiologists in the United Kingdom. I was surprised when he told me that he had not taken the COVID vaccine. He explained to me that he had concerns because he had seen in the supplementary appendix of Pfizer's original trial that there were four cardiac arrests in the vaccine group and only one in the placebo. These numbers were small and did not reach statistical significance. So this could be random chance, or his concern was it could represent a signal of problems in the future. And if this was the case, we are going to have a huge problem. He said he'd rather wait and see what happens before taking the vaccine. On July 26, 2021, my father, aged 73, who was a very prominent, well known doctor in the UK, including being the honorary vice president of the British Medical Association and had received honours from the Queen of England with an OBE, suffered an unexpected sudden cardiac arrest. I was particularly devastated by this happening and I was also I find it difficult to understand why my father, who was a fit and well man, I knew his cardiac history and his cardiac status, would suffer a cardiac arrest. But also my initial investigation was to try and understand why there had been a 30 minutes ambulance delay arriving to his apartment. Two weeks later, the deputy chief nurse of NHS England, a government health body, called me up. She was very upset, she knew my father very well and she was crying and she told me, Aseem, there's something I need to tell you. She in effect told me that throughout the country, for the last two months prior to my father's cardiac arrest in most regions of the UK, ambulances were not getting to patients in time for heart attacks and cardiac arrests. And there had been a deliberate, and I will use these words because I mentioned it, I've mentioned it before, a cover up involving the government and the Department of Health to withhold this information from doctors and the public. I worked with an investigative journalist with the I newspaper in the UK to write an article and a news story that became BBC News headlines a few months later, exposing this. Just before I exposed this, I messaged a professor of cardiology who I trust in the UK. He has a leadership role to explain to him what had happened and what I was about to do. I have text message evidence of this. He told me not to do this because it would make me enemies. I explained to him that I had a duty to patients and the public. I'm highlighting this as one example and I'll give you more examples of a cultural problem within medicine. The next part of this story is the post mortem findings of my father. They did not make any sense to me. I am considered a leading expert, maybe in the world, on the development and progression of coronary artery disease. My father had two severe blockages in his coronary arteries. There was no actual evidence of heart attack and likely there was a rhythm disturbance because of reduced blood supply that led to his cardiac arrest. Then in, within the space of a few weeks, around October and November, 3, different sources of information was brought to my attention that made me realise that there was probably a significant problem with the COVID mRNA vaccine. The first in October 2021. I remember I was giving lectures in Stockholm. I was contacted by a journalist with a Times newspaper who reported to me and said, Dr Malhotra, we have reports of an unexplained 25% increase in heart attacks in hospitals in Scotland and asked me what I thought was going on. I explained to her that at that time, with the evidence I knew in my own experience, I said that two likely contributory factors were lockdown stress. We know that when populations undergo severe stress after war, for example, there is an increase in heart attacks and strokes that can last for many years. She asked me whether I thought that there was a contribution. I was surprised when she asked me whether I thought there may be a contribution of the COVID vaccine to these heart attacks. I said to her, a good scientist should never exclude any possibility. But I felt at the time it was unlikely to be related to the COVID vaccine. But we should watch this space and keep our eyes open. A few weeks later, a publication appeared in the Journal Circulation, which is considered the highest impact cardiology journal in the United States that revealed a potentially very strong link between the COVID mRNA vaccines and acceleration in heart attack risk. Very specifically, in several hundred people of middle age, there was a plausible mechanism, by use of inflammatory markers in the blood, that increased the baseline risk of those people having a heart attack in five years, from 11% to 25%, just within two months of having the COVID mRNA vaccines. Of course, this is one bit of data, but even if partially true, that is a huge increase in risk in a very short space of time. And for me now made me think and link back to why my father may have suffered a cardiac arrest six months after having two doses of the vaccine. I remember thinking and speaking to a colleague, that if this was true, then we were going to see an increase in cardiac arrests, heart attacks and excess deaths in heavily vaccinated countries for the next few years. Then within a few weeks, I was called up by a whistleblower at a very prestigious british institution. I will name that institution, which I have not done publicly before as a University of Oxford. This cardiologist explained to me that a group of researchers in his department had accidentally found, through the use of very specialised imaging of the heart, that there was a signal of increased inflammation of the heart arteries, which was there in the vaccinated, but not there in the unvaccinated. The lead researcher of that group had sat down, the juniors, and had said that we are not going to explore these findings any further because it may affect our funding from the pharmaceutical industry. At that point, with these three bits of information, I then felt it was my ethical duty to speak out. And I went on GBNews to talk about what I'd found what I'd heard and I'd asked for the Vaccine Committee of the UK on TV to investigate this, to see whether there was a real problem with the vaccine in relation to heart issues. Around the same time which I found very strange is that the Secretary of State for Health at that stage, who was not Matt Hancock, was Sajid Javid, had announced in parliament that we are going to introduce legislation to ensure that all healthcare workers are mandated to have the COVID vaccine. For me, this, by that stage had no ethical or scientific justification, because certainly after the summer of 2021, it had become very apparent that the COVID mRNA vaccine was not stopping infection and it certainly was not stopping transmission. It was understood that approximately 80,000 NHS workers had refused at this stage to have the COVID vaccine. And now they were threatened with losing their job if by April the following year they had not been fully vaccinated. Many of these people were very concerned and contacted me around that time, I was also conducting many interviews, both through the BBC and Sky News and GBNews in regards to what happened with my father's ambulance delay. And I used it as an opportunity on the mainstream media to call for Sajid Javid, the secretary for health, to U-turn on the introduction of a mandate for healthcare workers based upon the fact that I felt it was not scientific and it was unethical. I also received my own personal backlash from these comments where I was contacted by the Royal College of Physicians who I had an affiliation with, and they asked me to respond to anonymous complaints from doctors that I was spreading, in quotes, antivax disinformation. I felt with my own knowledge and experience of the healthcare system that this was a direct response probably fueled by a combination of willful blindness and institutional corruption. To elaborate a bit further, when I say institutional corruption, I mean that my view was that the complaints were likely being fueled by academics with financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry. I felt very concerned about the potential introduction of the vaccine, well, the vaccine mandate. And therefore I decided there were two things that I decided to do. The first was I made a phone call to the chairman of the British Medical Association in December 2021. I had a good relationship with him and he respected my opinion. And I spent 2 hours on the phone explaining to him everything that I knew up to that stage about my concerns of the COVID mRNA vaccine. He said to me, "Aseem, nobody appears to critically appraise the evidence on the COVID mRNA vaccine as well as you have from our conversation, he said, most of my colleagues are getting their information on the benefits and harms of the vaccine from the BBC". This was replicated by the former chair of the CDC in the United States, Rochelle Walensky, who in an interview later on had said that her initial optimism of the vaccine benefits came from CNN News report. I say this just to emphasise that we should all accept our vulnerabilities to where we receive health information. Even doctors, policymakers, judges and lawyers are all influenced on the public massively by mainstream media. The chairman of the BMA also agreed with me. There was no ethical or scientific justification for mandating the COVID vaccine. He said the BMA also did not support it. And he said because of my conversation with him, he would speak directly to the secretary for health, Sajid Javid. One month later, at the end of January 2022, the COVID vaccine mandate for healthcare workers was overturned. I at that stage, given the fact that there was some backlash happening towards me, I realised that because this is a very big issue and area, and not my initial area of expertise, I needed to carry out my own critical analysis of the COVID mRNA vaccines. I spent six to nine months critically appraising the data, including speaking to two Pfizer whistleblowers, three investigative medical journalists and eminent scientists from the University of Oxford, Stanford and Harvard. The most critical bit, the most critical research that was published on this issue, which I think the whole court should acknowledge in August 2022, was published in the journal Vaccine. That research was conducted by some of the world's top independent of drug industry influence academics. That research, we was able to reanalyze the original randomised control trials conducted by Pfizer and Moderna. They were able to do this because new information was made available on the FDA's website and Health Canada's website. The conclusions of that paper were really very disturbing. The original trials that led to the drug regulatory approval of these vaccines revealed that you were more likely to suffer serious harm from taking the vaccine, specifically hospitalisation, life changing event or disability, than you were to be hospitalised with COVID That rate of harm at two months was very high at 1 in 800. Just to give you some perspective, historically we have suspended other vaccines for much less. In 1976, the swine flu vaccine was pulled because it was found to cause a neurological syndrome called Guillain-Barre syndrome In one in 100,000 people. In 1999, the rotavirus vaccine was suspended because it was found to cause a form of bowel obstruction in children affecting 1 in 10,000. This was 1 in 800. In my view, it was very clear that given this information, published in the highest impact Vaccine journal in the world, peer reviewed, and has not had any significant rebuttals, that this vaccine now, in my view, should never have been approved for use in a single human being in the first place. In my view, this very important court case in some ways, actually is a distraction from the much bigger issue, which is there should be court cases around the world with a full inquiry into the pharmaceutical industry and an inquiry as to how we got this so very wrong. Of course, one could argue this is just one bit of research, but actually, unfortunately, there are different, many different strands of research that are showing a signal of considerable and common serious harm from these vaccines. From pharmacovigilance data that is reporting what we call yellow card reports from the public. We have plausible biological mechanism of harm. We have other research called observational data. We have autopsy data also confirming that certainly with the majority of people who died within a short space of time of having the vaccine in relation to the heart, was definitively caused by the vaccine. This is really a very, very, very horrific situation we find ourselves in. One would hope and expect that the regulators should be independently evaluating all medications. But of course, the evidence reveals this is far from true. There was an investigation by the BMJ, also published in the summer of 2022, which revealed that most of the major regulators across the world were taking most of their money from the drug industry. For example, the MHRA in the UK receives 86% of its funding from the drug industry, and the FDA in America receives 65% of its funding from the drug industry, A fact that most doctors do not know. And therefore, I would not expect members of the court to know this either, is that very, very rarely do drug industry sponsored research get independently evaluated. Clinical trial data can often involve thousands of pages of information on individual patients. The drug companies hold onto that raw data. They then give summary results to the regulator, who are then paying, who have an incentive to approve the drugs, and the drugs are then approved. I made these points in my peer reviewed article published in the Journal of Insulin Resistance in September 2022, where I concluded that we should pause and investigate the issue around the COVID mRNA vaccines. I have since then been campaigning and advocating for a return to ethical evidence based medical practise around the world. Some of the clear solutions moving forward would be changes in the law that are required so that patients, doctors, members of the public can have greater confidence in the information they receive to make decisions about their health. Two very clear, low hanging fruit solutions, which are both ethical, scientific and democratic, would be that the drug industry should be allowed to develop drugs, but they shouldn't be allowed to test them themselves. And they certainly shouldn't be allowed to design their own research to and hold onto the raw data. Their information needs to be independently evaluated. One other clear solution would also be that the medical regulators, again, should not be taking any money from the industry, as this is a gross conflict of interest. I also want to highlight for people to understand the bigger picture. Prior to the pandemic, I had realised that there was a big problem with the reliability of clinical research, where invariably the results of clinical trials on all drugs sponsored by the drug industry, grossly exaggerate their safety and benefits. I have taken this information to the European Parliament, where I spoke in 2019, and I spoke to very senior politicians in the UK government. But although they were sympathetic, they felt that the issue was much bigger than them as individuals, and therefore it also needed media attention to get public awareness on the importance of such an inquiry. Before we continue with further questions, as I've been speaking for quite a long time now I'll just finish with two references just for the court and the judges to understand just how bad this problem is. Prepandemic the man who I call the Stephen Hawking of medicine is Professor John Ioannidis from the University of Stanford. The reason I call him the Stephen Hawking of Medicine is he's the most cited medical researcher in the world and is a mathematical genius. In 2006, he published a paper which was entitled why most published research findings are false. In that paper, he makes a point that the greater the financial interests in a given field, the less likely the research findings are to be true. I say this in context of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine which has made the company $100 billion. The other point that he makes in a further paper in 2017 is, again, the reason the system continues as it is is most doctors are unaware of the information they receive when they make clinical decisions has been corrupted by commercial influence. The other credible name I will mention is the editor of the Lancet, Richard Horton, who I personally know. In 2015, he wrote an article in the Lancet in relation to a secret meeting that had taken place with himself and some of the world's top medical academics. In that, he wrote that possibly half of the medical published literature may simply be untrue. And he said that science has taken a turn towards darkness. But who's going to take the first step to clean up the system? I believe in this case and in this court today, this is going to be a very pivotal potential moment in history for that first step. ---------------------- Dr Aseem Malhotra H/T: Tiina Keskimäki 🇫🇮

aussie17

797,301 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Election fraud in Guatemala… if happens here, it will happen in the US in 2024. The facts: 1. The Supreme Electoral Tribunal (Like the FEC in the US) is in charge of the election, and in this election they didn't had an IT Director, the previous one is currently in court prosecuted because of "anomalies" in the previous election. How they managed to have control on the different voting systems? 2. Before our General Elections, and after the call for elections when all parties were already registered and participating, some were suspended and dismissed by the Supreme Electoral Tribunal (TSE), which the Electoral and Political Parties Law (LEPP) forbids, some parties appealed to the Constitutional Court, as their right to vote and be elected was being violated, and to this day, haven't get any response from the Court. 3. On June 25, the General Elections were held. There were thousands of complaints from almost all party poll watchers. Among these complaints, there were reports of party poll watchers being kidnapped during the countdown; records being edited in the absence of party poll watchers, changing the votes; data tampering during data entry into the system; forgery of the original physical records; polling station officers refusing to provide the necessary paper forms to report this incidents, etc. The very same day, and the next day, many party poll watchers reported these incidents with the polling station officers to the Public Ministry (Kind of the General Attorney's Office in the US) and to the Constitutional Court. This is well documented in the video included in this post. 4. The Constitutional Court sent its ruling to the Supreme Court of Justice, and they ordered to the Supreme Electoral Tribunal and the Electoral Boards to compare the original records (white papers) with the copies (yellow papers), and to recount the votes, in a hearing, in the presence of party poll watchers and the media. The Electoral Boards didn't comply with the ruling, and the media was almost absent or didn't publish the complaints and findings, producing a general discontent and distrust in the electoral process. Some party poll watchers escalated their reports to the Public Ministry, reporting the misdeeds of the polling station officers. Several party poll watchers called for a repeat of the elections due to all the flaws found, and of course, the media pundits created the false narrative that auditing the records and recounting the votes was going against what was voted in the ballot boxes and against the electoral law, when in reality, it's a way to make the process more transparent and it is clearly stipulated in Article III of the Electoral and Political Parties Law 5. According to the dubious results, from the more than 20 candidates, for the first time in the country's history, the majority of the votes were null, the winner was null, which is a clear indication of the widespread discontent and mistrust for the Guatemalan political class, but because none of the candidates got more than 50%+1 of the votes, a second round is needed. Is worth noting that the second place after null was held by the UNE party, a left-wing political candidate Sandra Torres got it, and the third place in these dubious results was obtained by the political party "Movimiento Semilla", an extreme left-wing political party with a presidential candidate virtually unknown throughout the entire country, this raised suspicions among absolutely all Guatemalans, except for the typical media pundits who tried to justify it at all costs with any baseless excuse or narrative. 6. After some pressure from foreign forces, the Supreme Court of Justice ruled that The Electoral Boards comply with what was needed, but this was a lie, they were pressured not to proceed with the legal process. It is worth noting that "Movimiento Semilla" party, is well connected with international forces, most of their members have belonged to NGOs founded by none other that George Soros through his Open Society Foundations, so is most of our media pundits, and most of the college professors, for instance, former Secretary-General and current Semilla's candidate for Congress, Samuel Andrés Pérez Alvarez, is son of the Abraham Samuel Pérez de León, who has been an advisor to the World Bank and the UNDP/PNUD; he is a professor in Universidad Rafael Landívar which receives grants from the Open Society Foundations for the "independent news site" called Plaza Pública where both father and son write their columns. 7. During the process, Guatemalan prosecutor Rafael Curruchiche issued a public statement exposing an open case against "Movimiento Semilla" party, a process that started around 2018, way before the elections. Curruchiche showed legal documents and evidence from the forensic agencies' expert examination, showing forgery of signatures in the party affiliation process, affiliating dead people, affiliations only with signature and without names. Considering that in Guatemala, in order to have a political party, you have to affiliate certain number of people, failing to do so, makes the legal figure that constitutes the party, lack the necessary foundation, thus, nullifying the party, but again, even without the legal representation, the party appealed to the Constitutional Court, which under foreign pressures, granted protection to the inexistent party, citing that the electoral law establishes that once the election call has been made, parties cannot be canceled. However, they did cancel other parties after the call, demonstrating that there is no equality before the law, and that this party has privileges due to its connections abroad. This was one of the complains of other candidate that was left out of the election on similar grounds. It is worth noting that the prosecutor notified the Supreme Electoral Tribunal about this matters since 2018, and they didn't nullify the party, and it is also worth noting that Semilla was reported for receiving funding from abroad, specifically, from the Netherlands Institute for Multiparty Democracy (NIMD), and even tho there was a legal preceding, the Supreme Electoral Tribunal protected Semilla ignoring the law. 8. While all these events were transpiring, after hearing Semilla's almost unknown presidential candidate mention the elections observers from as the ones validating the results, I did a research on who were these election observers sent by the EU, who spare no expense with hundreds of members all over the country in quite expensive cars. It turns out that these observers, just before the election, held a meeting only with Semilla's presidential candidate and with no other candidate, most of its members are in fact, members of the party or acquaintances that have work along in the very same NGOs, and all the "influencers" and young tiktokers that support the party and engaged in smear campaigns against all other parties, were also election observers for and similar NGOs, the case of Romeo Alejandro Méndez Zuñiga who partnered with José Roberto Alejos Cámbara (brother of convicted Gustavo Adolfo Alejos Cámbara) in his NGO of observer called Caminemos Political Association, which has received grants from the Netherlands Institute for Multiparty Democracy (NIMD). I wrote a long post with all the evidence, it is in Spanish but you can use any web translator, it includes a great hearing with .Rep. Scott Perry exposing how USAID (which is embedded in all this NGOs) is founding ideological groups in Guatemala: 9. Verifying that political parties comply with the law and do their job properly, without affiliating deceased individuals, without forged signatures, or affiliating only with signatures and without names as Semilla did, is the responsibility of the Registrar of Citizens, Ramiro José Muñoz Jordán, who was ordered by a judge to suspend the Semilla party, if he fail to comply with the ruling, appropriate measures will be issued, possibly facing a warrant, but before he was notified, the Supreme Electoral Tribunal grant him vacations, and his whereabouts are currently unknown. This lead to more distrust in the whole electoral process, and the opacity of the Supreme Electoral Tribunal. 10. Recently, the corrupt President Magistrate of the Supreme Electoral Tribunal, Irma Elizabeth Palencia Orellana, usurping functions, since according to our constitution, international relations are the exclusive domain of the executive branch, called for a statement from the Secretary-General of the OAS, Luis Almagro, who is aligned with the globalists of Semilla. We are experiencing an electoral fraud, one that is fiercely protected by foreign forces who seek impunity for both, the Supreme Electoral Tribunal and the corruption within the Semilla Party, a fraud strongly defended by the media by not only hiding what truly happened, but also distorting and misrepresenting the actual events and facts with unfounded narratives to manipulate the masses and public opinion, and if it happens here, in this laboratory of so many three letter foreign agencies, it will happen in the USA, as it always does. It happened here in 2019, it happened there in November 2020, it will be the same in 2024 there. Please, address this issue, do your own due diligence, there is a lot to uncover. .Donald Trump Jr. .Marjorie Taylor Greene .Mark R. Levin .GregGutfeld .Jesse Watters .Charlie Kirk .DC_Draino .Terrence K. Williams .Sebastian Gorka DrG .Ted Cruz .Steven Crowder .Tulsi Gabbard 🌺 .Rob Schneider 🇺🇸 .E . .End Wokeness .Tim Pool .James O'Keefe .Robert F. Kennedy Jr .Dr Jordan B Peterson .Ben Shapiro .Lex Fridman .MaryAnastasiaO'Grady .Salomondrin 🤖 .Luis Almagro
14:17

Election fraud in Guatemala… if happens here, it will happen in the US in 2024. The facts: 1. The Supreme Electoral Tribunal (Like the FEC in the US) is in charge of the election, and in this election they didn't had an IT Director, the previous one is currently in court prosecuted because of "anomalies" in the previous election. How they managed to have control on the different voting systems? 2. Before our General Elections, and after the call for elections when all parties were already registered and participating, some were suspended and dismissed by the Supreme Electoral Tribunal (TSE), which the Electoral and Political Parties Law (LEPP) forbids, some parties appealed to the Constitutional Court, as their right to vote and be elected was being violated, and to this day, haven't get any response from the Court. 3. On June 25, the General Elections were held. There were thousands of complaints from almost all party poll watchers. Among these complaints, there were reports of party poll watchers being kidnapped during the countdown; records being edited in the absence of party poll watchers, changing the votes; data tampering during data entry into the system; forgery of the original physical records; polling station officers refusing to provide the necessary paper forms to report this incidents, etc. The very same day, and the next day, many party poll watchers reported these incidents with the polling station officers to the Public Ministry (Kind of the General Attorney's Office in the US) and to the Constitutional Court. This is well documented in the video included in this post. 4. The Constitutional Court sent its ruling to the Supreme Court of Justice, and they ordered to the Supreme Electoral Tribunal and the Electoral Boards to compare the original records (white papers) with the copies (yellow papers), and to recount the votes, in a hearing, in the presence of party poll watchers and the media. The Electoral Boards didn't comply with the ruling, and the media was almost absent or didn't publish the complaints and findings, producing a general discontent and distrust in the electoral process. Some party poll watchers escalated their reports to the Public Ministry, reporting the misdeeds of the polling station officers. Several party poll watchers called for a repeat of the elections due to all the flaws found, and of course, the media pundits created the false narrative that auditing the records and recounting the votes was going against what was voted in the ballot boxes and against the electoral law, when in reality, it's a way to make the process more transparent and it is clearly stipulated in Article III of the Electoral and Political Parties Law 5. According to the dubious results, from the more than 20 candidates, for the first time in the country's history, the majority of the votes were null, the winner was null, which is a clear indication of the widespread discontent and mistrust for the Guatemalan political class, but because none of the candidates got more than 50%+1 of the votes, a second round is needed. Is worth noting that the second place after null was held by the UNE party, a left-wing political candidate Sandra Torres got it, and the third place in these dubious results was obtained by the political party "Movimiento Semilla", an extreme left-wing political party with a presidential candidate virtually unknown throughout the entire country, this raised suspicions among absolutely all Guatemalans, except for the typical media pundits who tried to justify it at all costs with any baseless excuse or narrative. 6. After some pressure from foreign forces, the Supreme Court of Justice ruled that The Electoral Boards comply with what was needed, but this was a lie, they were pressured not to proceed with the legal process. It is worth noting that "Movimiento Semilla" party, is well connected with international forces, most of their members have belonged to NGOs founded by none other that George Soros through his Open Society Foundations, so is most of our media pundits, and most of the college professors, for instance, former Secretary-General and current Semilla's candidate for Congress, Samuel Andrés Pérez Alvarez, is son of the Abraham Samuel Pérez de León, who has been an advisor to the World Bank and the UNDP/PNUD; he is a professor in Universidad Rafael Landívar which receives grants from the Open Society Foundations for the "independent news site" called Plaza Pública where both father and son write their columns. 7. During the process, Guatemalan prosecutor Rafael Curruchiche issued a public statement exposing an open case against "Movimiento Semilla" party, a process that started around 2018, way before the elections. Curruchiche showed legal documents and evidence from the forensic agencies' expert examination, showing forgery of signatures in the party affiliation process, affiliating dead people, affiliations only with signature and without names. Considering that in Guatemala, in order to have a political party, you have to affiliate certain number of people, failing to do so, makes the legal figure that constitutes the party, lack the necessary foundation, thus, nullifying the party, but again, even without the legal representation, the party appealed to the Constitutional Court, which under foreign pressures, granted protection to the inexistent party, citing that the electoral law establishes that once the election call has been made, parties cannot be canceled. However, they did cancel other parties after the call, demonstrating that there is no equality before the law, and that this party has privileges due to its connections abroad. This was one of the complains of other candidate that was left out of the election on similar grounds. It is worth noting that the prosecutor notified the Supreme Electoral Tribunal about this matters since 2018, and they didn't nullify the party, and it is also worth noting that Semilla was reported for receiving funding from abroad, specifically, from the Netherlands Institute for Multiparty Democracy (NIMD), and even tho there was a legal preceding, the Supreme Electoral Tribunal protected Semilla ignoring the law. 8. While all these events were transpiring, after hearing Semilla's almost unknown presidential candidate mention the elections observers from as the ones validating the results, I did a research on who were these election observers sent by the EU, who spare no expense with hundreds of members all over the country in quite expensive cars. It turns out that these observers, just before the election, held a meeting only with Semilla's presidential candidate and with no other candidate, most of its members are in fact, members of the party or acquaintances that have work along in the very same NGOs, and all the "influencers" and young tiktokers that support the party and engaged in smear campaigns against all other parties, were also election observers for and similar NGOs, the case of Romeo Alejandro Méndez Zuñiga who partnered with José Roberto Alejos Cámbara (brother of convicted Gustavo Adolfo Alejos Cámbara) in his NGO of observer called Caminemos Political Association, which has received grants from the Netherlands Institute for Multiparty Democracy (NIMD). I wrote a long post with all the evidence, it is in Spanish but you can use any web translator, it includes a great hearing with .Rep. Scott Perry exposing how USAID (which is embedded in all this NGOs) is founding ideological groups in Guatemala: 9. Verifying that political parties comply with the law and do their job properly, without affiliating deceased individuals, without forged signatures, or affiliating only with signatures and without names as Semilla did, is the responsibility of the Registrar of Citizens, Ramiro José Muñoz Jordán, who was ordered by a judge to suspend the Semilla party, if he fail to comply with the ruling, appropriate measures will be issued, possibly facing a warrant, but before he was notified, the Supreme Electoral Tribunal grant him vacations, and his whereabouts are currently unknown. This lead to more distrust in the whole electoral process, and the opacity of the Supreme Electoral Tribunal. 10. Recently, the corrupt President Magistrate of the Supreme Electoral Tribunal, Irma Elizabeth Palencia Orellana, usurping functions, since according to our constitution, international relations are the exclusive domain of the executive branch, called for a statement from the Secretary-General of the OAS, Luis Almagro, who is aligned with the globalists of Semilla. We are experiencing an electoral fraud, one that is fiercely protected by foreign forces who seek impunity for both, the Supreme Electoral Tribunal and the corruption within the Semilla Party, a fraud strongly defended by the media by not only hiding what truly happened, but also distorting and misrepresenting the actual events and facts with unfounded narratives to manipulate the masses and public opinion, and if it happens here, in this laboratory of so many three letter foreign agencies, it will happen in the USA, as it always does. It happened here in 2019, it happened there in November 2020, it will be the same in 2024 there. Please, address this issue, do your own due diligence, there is a lot to uncover. .Donald Trump Jr. .Marjorie Taylor Greene .Mark R. Levin .GregGutfeld .Jesse Watters .Charlie Kirk .DC_Draino .Terrence K. Williams .Sebastian Gorka DrG .Ted Cruz .Steven Crowder .Tulsi Gabbard 🌺 .Rob Schneider 🇺🇸 .E . .End Wokeness .Tim Pool .James O'Keefe .Robert F. Kennedy Jr .Dr Jordan B Peterson .Ben Shapiro .Lex Fridman .MaryAnastasiaO'Grady .Salomondrin 🤖 .Luis Almagro

Rodrigo Polo

67,745 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren