Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

True computer use is fully general. FDM-1 uses arrow keys on a computer to steer a car in San Francisco with less than 1 hour of fine-tuning data. The action policy is critical: tuning FDM-1 to drive gets much higher accuracy than tuning just the video encoder on the...

72,372 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

14 Kommentare

Profilbild von Standard Intelligence
Standard Intelligencevor 6 Monaten

FDM-1 completes complex tasks and navigates interfaces well enough to use CAD applications. Forking VMs allow us to snapshot when a successful operation completes (extrusion, selection, etc.), letting us apply test-time compute to computer use.

Profilbild von Standard Intelligence
Standard Intelligencevor 6 Monaten

Inspired by VPT (Baker et al), we train an inverse dynamics model (IDM) to predict frame-by-frame computer actions. The IDM leverages 40k hours of contractor data to label 11 million hours of screen recordings—550,000x larger than the largest open-source computer use dataset.

Profilbild von Standard Intelligence
Standard Intelligencevor 6 Monaten

We’ve made two main advances: the ability to train on our 11M+ hour computer action dataset and understand long-context video. Our video encoder can fit nearly two hours of 30FPS, high-resolution video into a 1M token context window, ~50x more efficient than existing SOTA.

Profilbild von Standard Intelligence
Standard Intelligencevor 6 Monaten

Computer use models shouldn't learn from screenshots. We built a new foundation model that learns from video like humans do. FDM-1 can construct a gear in Blender, find software bugs, and even drive a real car through San Francisco using arrow keys.

Profilbild von Standard Intelligence
Standard Intelligencevor 6 Monaten

Here’s the blog post, where you can learn more about how we trained this model:

Profilbild von agniv
agnivvor 6 Monaten

HOLY DUCK

Profilbild von _____
_____vor 6 Monaten

amazing work! any idea why the baseline for the self driving task starts out worse than random guessing though?

Profilbild von Yuze
Yuzevor 6 Monaten

fascinating work on the context compression part! Wondering if the model would be able to know what is a good quality action at system 2 level. eg. when to raise/fall on playing card games 😀

Profilbild von Yuval Grossman
Yuval Grossmanvor 6 Monaten

Can you explain what do you mean here by “tuning the video encoder”?

Profilbild von Samu
Samuvor 6 Monaten

nice

Profilbild von madhavan
madhavanvor 6 Monaten

holy fire

Profilbild von Gary Basin
Gary Basinvor 6 Monaten

> less than 1 hour of fine-tuning data

Profilbild von FallenOne
FallenOnevor 6 Monaten

that's so cool

Profilbild von Haris Poljo
Haris Poljovor 6 Monaten

@comma_ai

Ähnliche Videos

New Course: Reinforcement Fine-Tuning LLMs with GRPO! Learn to use reinforcement learning to improve your LLM performance in this short course, built in collaboration with Predibase by Rubrik, and taught by Travis Addair, its Co-Founder and CTO, and Arnav Garg, its Senior Engineer and Machine Learning Lead. Reasoning models have been one of the most important developments in LLMs. Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT) uses rewards to encourage LLMs to find solutions to multi-step reasoning tasks such as solving math problems and debugging code - without needing pre-existing training examples like in traditional supervised fine-tuning. Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) is a reinforcement fine-tuning algorithm gaining rapid adoption. Developed by the DeepSeek team and used to train the R1 reasoning model, GRPO uses reward functions that you can write in Python to assign rewards to model responses. It’s beneficial for tasks with verifiable outcomes and can work well even with fewer than 100 training examples. It can also significantly improve the reasoning ability of smaller LLMs, making applications faster and more cost effective. In this course, you’ll take a technical deep dive into RFT with GRPO. You’ll learn to build reward functions that you can use in the GRPO training process to guide an LLM toward better performance on multi-step reasoning tasks. In detail, you’ll: - Learn when reinforcement fine-tuning is a better fit than supervised fine-tuning, especially for tasks involving multi-step reasoning or limited labeled data. - Understand how GRPO uses programmable reward functions as a more scalable alternative to the human feedback required for other reinforcement learning algorithms, such as RLHF and DPO. - Frame the Wordle game as a reinforcement fine-tuning problem and see how an LLM can learn to plan, analyze feedback, and improve its strategy over time. - Design reward functions that power the reinforcement fine-tuning process. - Learn techniques for evaluating more subjective tasks, such as rating the quality of a text summary, using an LLM as a judge. - Understand why reward hacking happens and how to avoid it by adding penalty functions to discourage undesirable behaviors. - Learn the four key components of the loss calculation in the GRPO algorithm: token probability distribution ratios, advantages, clipping, and KL-divergence. - Launch reinforcement fine-tuning jobs using Predibase’s hosted training services. By the end of this course, you’ll be able to build and fine-tune LLMs using reinforcement learning to improve reasoning without relying on large labeled datasets or subjective human feedback. Please sign up here:

Andrew Ng

86,697 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr