Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

True science thrives on verification, not just consensus. But a major loophole is undermining trust: Peer reviewers often never see the raw data. This is especially true for vaccine studies. We’re told to “trust the science,” but the critical data needed to verify that science is locked away. Take...

newstart_2024's profile picture

Camus

427,449 subscribers

91,994 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Sağlık & İyilikBilim & Teknoloji
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

BREAKING: Del Bigtree and ICAN Announce Major Lawsuit Against the CDC to Expose Hidden Vaccine Safety Data Del Bigtree, founder of the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN), just dropped a bombshell on The HighWire: a groundbreaking lawsuit targeting the CDC to unlock the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) data, a massive database tracking vaccine safety for millions of Americans. This isn’t just a legal fight; it’s a battle for truth, transparency, and the right of every citizen to know what’s in the vaccines they’re told are safe and effective. The VSD, established in 1990, compiles electronic health records from 11 major healthcare organizations nationwide. With over 359 studies in PubMed (as of Sept 2024) relying on its data, it’s a cornerstone of vaccine safety monitoring. But here’s the catch: years ago, after independent scientists used VSD data to publish studies raising concerns about vaccine risks, the CDC quietly moved the VSD outside government control, seemingly to dodge Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. Since then, access has been tightly restricted, leaving the public and most scientists in the dark. Bigtree is calling this moveව Black and white photo of a person standing in front of a brick wallBigtree is calling this move a deliberate attempt to hide critical data from the American people. He declared that they want the VSD not just available, they want it public. Any scientist, anywhere, should be able to say, I want to check your work. Show me the Pfizer data. Show me the COVID vaccine injury reports. Prove it’s safe. The stakes are high: without access, how can we trust claims about vaccine safety? How can we understand the injuries reported in hearings like Sen. Ron Johnson’s recent sessions? This lawsuit is personal for Bigtree, who played a key role in securing Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s nomination as HHS Secretary. Now, he’s stepping back to focus on this fight, even if it means challenging allies in government. He said he’s hitting this from all sides, vowing to make the VSD accessible forever, not just for the next two years, but for all time. Why does this matter? Because the VSD holds answers. Answers about vaccine injuries. Answers about how safety is determined. Answers the public deserves. Right now, Bigtree says, it’s being hidden from us. That’s why so many are being injured. This legal battle could be long, but it’s historic. It’s a test of what happens when citizens demand accountability from their own government, even when friends are in high places. Bigtree invites you to join the experiment: follow this lawsuit, share this post, and demand vaccine transparency.
2:22

BREAKING: Del Bigtree and ICAN Announce Major Lawsuit Against the CDC to Expose Hidden Vaccine Safety Data Del Bigtree, founder of the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN), just dropped a bombshell on The HighWire: a groundbreaking lawsuit targeting the CDC to unlock the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) data, a massive database tracking vaccine safety for millions of Americans. This isn’t just a legal fight; it’s a battle for truth, transparency, and the right of every citizen to know what’s in the vaccines they’re told are safe and effective. The VSD, established in 1990, compiles electronic health records from 11 major healthcare organizations nationwide. With over 359 studies in PubMed (as of Sept 2024) relying on its data, it’s a cornerstone of vaccine safety monitoring. But here’s the catch: years ago, after independent scientists used VSD data to publish studies raising concerns about vaccine risks, the CDC quietly moved the VSD outside government control, seemingly to dodge Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. Since then, access has been tightly restricted, leaving the public and most scientists in the dark. Bigtree is calling this moveව Black and white photo of a person standing in front of a brick wallBigtree is calling this move a deliberate attempt to hide critical data from the American people. He declared that they want the VSD not just available, they want it public. Any scientist, anywhere, should be able to say, I want to check your work. Show me the Pfizer data. Show me the COVID vaccine injury reports. Prove it’s safe. The stakes are high: without access, how can we trust claims about vaccine safety? How can we understand the injuries reported in hearings like Sen. Ron Johnson’s recent sessions? This lawsuit is personal for Bigtree, who played a key role in securing Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s nomination as HHS Secretary. Now, he’s stepping back to focus on this fight, even if it means challenging allies in government. He said he’s hitting this from all sides, vowing to make the VSD accessible forever, not just for the next two years, but for all time. Why does this matter? Because the VSD holds answers. Answers about vaccine injuries. Answers about how safety is determined. Answers the public deserves. Right now, Bigtree says, it’s being hidden from us. That’s why so many are being injured. This legal battle could be long, but it’s historic. It’s a test of what happens when citizens demand accountability from their own government, even when friends are in high places. Bigtree invites you to join the experiment: follow this lawsuit, share this post, and demand vaccine transparency.

Camus

35,630 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

RFK Jr Goes Off on CNN Reporter Reporter: "It's factually true that the covid vaccine worked. The covid vaccine prevented deaths. There is data upon data upon data." RFK Jr: "Can you show me one study?" Reporter: "I can tell you that when it comes to the vaccine, there have been studies that show that because of vaccine disinformation, there could have been 100,000 to 200,000 lives in the US saved, but because people didn't get the vaccine..." RFK Jr: "You are saying something that you cannot show me a single study." Reporter: "I am not saying nonsense. You're talking about studies that don't exist." RFK Jr: "Do you see your job as ending vaccine hesitancy, or do you see your job is telling the truth?" Reporter: "I see my job is telling the truth, and the truth is that there is study after study after study. It's one of the most studied things out there in science." RFK Jr: "You repeat it like a parrot. I've actually read the science." Reporter: "I'm not debating this..." RFK Jr: "Of course you're not because all you know how to do is repeat things that people told you and say trust the experts. That's what you did during covid." RFK Jr: "Now we know that Anthony Fauci, who was the expert, was lying about everything, about masks, about the social distancing, about natural immunity, about the transmission from the vaccine, about the source of covid. He was lying, and you were punishing people for not trusting the experts, and now you're rolling out the experts again to talk about something that you have no personal knowledge of." Reporter: "Okay, well guess what? That is my job to talk to people."
3:52

RFK Jr Goes Off on CNN Reporter Reporter: "It's factually true that the covid vaccine worked. The covid vaccine prevented deaths. There is data upon data upon data." RFK Jr: "Can you show me one study?" Reporter: "I can tell you that when it comes to the vaccine, there have been studies that show that because of vaccine disinformation, there could have been 100,000 to 200,000 lives in the US saved, but because people didn't get the vaccine..." RFK Jr: "You are saying something that you cannot show me a single study." Reporter: "I am not saying nonsense. You're talking about studies that don't exist." RFK Jr: "Do you see your job as ending vaccine hesitancy, or do you see your job is telling the truth?" Reporter: "I see my job is telling the truth, and the truth is that there is study after study after study. It's one of the most studied things out there in science." RFK Jr: "You repeat it like a parrot. I've actually read the science." Reporter: "I'm not debating this..." RFK Jr: "Of course you're not because all you know how to do is repeat things that people told you and say trust the experts. That's what you did during covid." RFK Jr: "Now we know that Anthony Fauci, who was the expert, was lying about everything, about masks, about the social distancing, about natural immunity, about the transmission from the vaccine, about the source of covid. He was lying, and you were punishing people for not trusting the experts, and now you're rolling out the experts again to talk about something that you have no personal knowledge of." Reporter: "Okay, well guess what? That is my job to talk to people."

PBD Podcast

48,240 görüntüleme • 19 gün önce

FDA’s Dangerous Betrayal of Science & Transparency: A Warning from Dr. Marty Makary "We just watched our government do the most dangerous thing a government could ever do." Dr. Marty Makary, renowned surgeon and public health expert, delivers a chilling indictment of the FDA’s reckless approval of a novel vaccine for young, healthy kids—despite internal dissent. Two top vaccine experts were fired for opposing its authorization. Then, the government mandated it, silenced doctors demanding data, and crushed scientific debate. This isn’t just failure—it’s a fundamental betrayal of science. Science thrives on transparency, skepticism, and evolving with evidence. Instead, we got censorship, coercion, and blind allegiance from the very institutions meant to protect public trust. "The purpose of science is open dialogue—to disagree, question, and adapt as data emerges." Yet today, doctors are punished for asking questions, data is hidden, and dissent is labeled "misinformation." This isn’t science—it’s authoritarianism in a lab coat. If we don’t demand accountability now, what will they force next?
0:46

FDA’s Dangerous Betrayal of Science & Transparency: A Warning from Dr. Marty Makary "We just watched our government do the most dangerous thing a government could ever do." Dr. Marty Makary, renowned surgeon and public health expert, delivers a chilling indictment of the FDA’s reckless approval of a novel vaccine for young, healthy kids—despite internal dissent. Two top vaccine experts were fired for opposing its authorization. Then, the government mandated it, silenced doctors demanding data, and crushed scientific debate. This isn’t just failure—it’s a fundamental betrayal of science. Science thrives on transparency, skepticism, and evolving with evidence. Instead, we got censorship, coercion, and blind allegiance from the very institutions meant to protect public trust. "The purpose of science is open dialogue—to disagree, question, and adapt as data emerges." Yet today, doctors are punished for asking questions, data is hidden, and dissent is labeled "misinformation." This isn’t science—it’s authoritarianism in a lab coat. If we don’t demand accountability now, what will they force next?

Camus

84,870 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

This one is from September 2, 2023. It is another case study on Fauci's method of prevarication. After devastating study citations from the interviewer showing that masks don't work, Fauci responded: "but masks work on an individual level". This is nonsense. Here's why. To do science on masks, you have a masked group and an unmasked group. You compare the rate of infection in each group. This is called a randomized trial. This is how science is done. If the rate of infection is the same, then masks don't work. This was what the studies on masks showed. No difference. Now, there is simply no such thing as scientific studies showing that "masks work at the individual level". Fauci either didn't understand how science works or he was lying and making things up. It really is that simple. Fauci said gobbledygook in order to keep the idea of masks alive. He did it throughout the pandemic, but especially with masks. It's incredibly shameful for Fauci to abuse science in this way. But it's par for the course in the way he communicated science throughout the entire pandemic. Sad.
2:18

This one is from September 2, 2023. It is another case study on Fauci's method of prevarication. After devastating study citations from the interviewer showing that masks don't work, Fauci responded: "but masks work on an individual level". This is nonsense. Here's why. To do science on masks, you have a masked group and an unmasked group. You compare the rate of infection in each group. This is called a randomized trial. This is how science is done. If the rate of infection is the same, then masks don't work. This was what the studies on masks showed. No difference. Now, there is simply no such thing as scientific studies showing that "masks work at the individual level". Fauci either didn't understand how science works or he was lying and making things up. It really is that simple. Fauci said gobbledygook in order to keep the idea of masks alive. He did it throughout the pandemic, but especially with masks. It's incredibly shameful for Fauci to abuse science in this way. But it's par for the course in the way he communicated science throughout the entire pandemic. Sad.

Kevin Bass

55,839 görüntüleme • 14 gün önce

"To say that vaccines do not cause autism is not a scientific statement. It is a belief." — Aaron Siri A stunning legal revelation exposes fundamental flaws in vaccine safety claims. Attorney Aaron Siri details how the CDC, when sued, failed to produce studies proving the safety of vaccines given in the first 6 months of life. Through a FOIA lawsuit, Siri's organization ICAN demanded studies showing Hep B, DTaP, and other early childhood vaccines don't cause autism. The CDC's response was telling: ❌ Provided ZERO dedicated studies on the 15 shots given before 6 months ❌ Offered 20 studies, but 19 were irrelevant (MMR or other ingredients) ❌ The one relevant review found a study linking DTaP to autism, which was dismissed Siri also dismantles the famous Danish MMR study, revealing critical flaws: • MMR is given after one year, but autism can be diagnosed before one year • The study only compares children who already received all their 2, 4, and 6-month vaccines • It ignores "healthy user bias" - children injured by earlier vaccines often don't receive MMR The conclusion is inescapable: The foundational safety science for the vaccination schedule given to infants is missing. The public has been told "the science is settled" while the most basic studies on the actual vaccine schedule have never been conducted. When the burden of proof falls on regulators, the evidence collapses.
2:55

"To say that vaccines do not cause autism is not a scientific statement. It is a belief." — Aaron Siri A stunning legal revelation exposes fundamental flaws in vaccine safety claims. Attorney Aaron Siri details how the CDC, when sued, failed to produce studies proving the safety of vaccines given in the first 6 months of life. Through a FOIA lawsuit, Siri's organization ICAN demanded studies showing Hep B, DTaP, and other early childhood vaccines don't cause autism. The CDC's response was telling: ❌ Provided ZERO dedicated studies on the 15 shots given before 6 months ❌ Offered 20 studies, but 19 were irrelevant (MMR or other ingredients) ❌ The one relevant review found a study linking DTaP to autism, which was dismissed Siri also dismantles the famous Danish MMR study, revealing critical flaws: • MMR is given after one year, but autism can be diagnosed before one year • The study only compares children who already received all their 2, 4, and 6-month vaccines • It ignores "healthy user bias" - children injured by earlier vaccines often don't receive MMR The conclusion is inescapable: The foundational safety science for the vaccination schedule given to infants is missing. The public has been told "the science is settled" while the most basic studies on the actual vaccine schedule have never been conducted. When the burden of proof falls on regulators, the evidence collapses.

Camus

23,976 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Today on CNN, after devastating study citations from the interviewer showing that masks don't work, Fauci responded: "but masks work on an individual level". But this is nonsense. Here's why. To do science on masks, you have a masked group and an unmasked group. You compare the rate of infection in each group. This is called a randomized trial. This is how science is done. If the rate of infection is the same, then masks don't work. This was what the studies on masks showed. No difference. Now, there is simply no such thing as scientific studies showing that "masks work at the individual level". Fauci either doesn't understand how science works or he is lying and making things up. It really is that simple. Fauci is saying gobbledygook in order to keep the idea of masks alive. It's incredibly shameful for Fauci to abuse science in this way. But it's par for the course in the way he has communicated science throughout the entire pandemic. Sad.
2:18

Today on CNN, after devastating study citations from the interviewer showing that masks don't work, Fauci responded: "but masks work on an individual level". But this is nonsense. Here's why. To do science on masks, you have a masked group and an unmasked group. You compare the rate of infection in each group. This is called a randomized trial. This is how science is done. If the rate of infection is the same, then masks don't work. This was what the studies on masks showed. No difference. Now, there is simply no such thing as scientific studies showing that "masks work at the individual level". Fauci either doesn't understand how science works or he is lying and making things up. It really is that simple. Fauci is saying gobbledygook in order to keep the idea of masks alive. It's incredibly shameful for Fauci to abuse science in this way. But it's par for the course in the way he has communicated science throughout the entire pandemic. Sad.

Kevin Bass

2,316,533 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

The Unethical Circle of Vaccine Science, Exposed by Its Own Architects. A stunning admission is playing out in plain sight. Former FDA Chief and Pfizer board member Scott Gottlieb is making his second media tour, laser-focused on one thing: stopping RFK Jr. from linking the aluminum adjuvant in vaccines to autism. Why such intense, specific concern from a man at the very heart of the pharmaceutical industry? The reason reveals an unforgivable flaw at the foundation of modern vaccine science. As highlighted in recent hearings, there has never been a placebo-controlled safety study on injected aluminum adjuvants. You will not find a study where one group gets aluminum and another gets saline. The official reason? It would be "unethical." Think about that. It's "unethical" to test the safety of a substance they have been injecting into billions of people, including children, for decades. Why is it unethical? Because aluminum is not a vitamin. It's a neurotoxicant with no beneficial role in the human body. Injecting it purely for a safety trial would offer the subject no benefit, only potential harm. Therefore, it's illegal. So let's state this clearly: 1. They admit it's unethical to inject aluminum to study its harm. 2. Yet, they have no ethical problem making it a "core ingredient" in almost every childhood vaccine. This is the indefensible circle: They never did the safety trial to establish a baseline of harm. They can't do it now because it would be unethical. But they continue to mandate the product. And Gottlieb’s own quote says it all: "If you take out aluminum, you'll destroy the whole vaccine program." That is the entire problem in one sentence. The program depends on an ingredient whose standalone safety has never been—and can ethically never be—established. This isn't conspiracy. This is the admission of a former FDA chief. The conversation has moved from "safe and effective" to "too big to fail." Where is the transparent science?
2:04

The Unethical Circle of Vaccine Science, Exposed by Its Own Architects. A stunning admission is playing out in plain sight. Former FDA Chief and Pfizer board member Scott Gottlieb is making his second media tour, laser-focused on one thing: stopping RFK Jr. from linking the aluminum adjuvant in vaccines to autism. Why such intense, specific concern from a man at the very heart of the pharmaceutical industry? The reason reveals an unforgivable flaw at the foundation of modern vaccine science. As highlighted in recent hearings, there has never been a placebo-controlled safety study on injected aluminum adjuvants. You will not find a study where one group gets aluminum and another gets saline. The official reason? It would be "unethical." Think about that. It's "unethical" to test the safety of a substance they have been injecting into billions of people, including children, for decades. Why is it unethical? Because aluminum is not a vitamin. It's a neurotoxicant with no beneficial role in the human body. Injecting it purely for a safety trial would offer the subject no benefit, only potential harm. Therefore, it's illegal. So let's state this clearly: 1. They admit it's unethical to inject aluminum to study its harm. 2. Yet, they have no ethical problem making it a "core ingredient" in almost every childhood vaccine. This is the indefensible circle: They never did the safety trial to establish a baseline of harm. They can't do it now because it would be unethical. But they continue to mandate the product. And Gottlieb’s own quote says it all: "If you take out aluminum, you'll destroy the whole vaccine program." That is the entire problem in one sentence. The program depends on an ingredient whose standalone safety has never been—and can ethically never be—established. This isn't conspiracy. This is the admission of a former FDA chief. The conversation has moved from "safe and effective" to "too big to fail." Where is the transparent science?

Camus

33,188 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

"Never a Placebo-Controlled Group": How Our Children's Vaccines Were Licensed on a Foundation of Flimsy Science. We are told the vaccine schedule is the most tested and safest in medical history. But what if that claim collapses under the weight of the actual data? Attorney Aaron Siri delivers a stunning fact that should halt every parent and citizen in their tracks: "Almost all childhood vaccines were licensed based on trials in which safety was reviewed for days or weeks after injection, underpowered, not enough kids, and there was never a placebo-controlled group for a single of the routine childhood vaccines injected into children, not one of them." Let that sink in. Not one. The gold standard of scientific research—the placebo-controlled trial—was abandoned for the entire routine childhood vaccine schedule. Why the Double Standard? For prescription drugs, companies run years-long, placebo-controlled trials. Why? Not ethics—economics. They are liable for damages. A harmful drug means financial ruin. For vaccines, the incentive is perversely flipped. With liability removed, the corporate boardroom's bottom-line calculus is simple: do the absolute minimum required for licensure. The Hep B Example is Jaw-Dropping Proof. The Combovax HB vaccine, given to babies on their first day of life, was licensed based on a "trial" that: - Monitored safety for just FIVE DAYS. - Included only 147 children. - Had NO control group whatsoever. This isn't just inadequate; it's scientifically indefensible. The recent COVID vaccine trials, often criticized as rushed, were vastly more comprehensive than this. The Root Cause? The Liability Shield. There is no doubt: if vaccine manufacturers were financially liable for injuries, the safety science would be exhaustive. They would never risk their profits on such flimsy data. The absence of liability created an absence of scientific rigor. This isn't conspiracy. It's cold, hard corporate calculus, and our children are the ones living in the experiment. It's long past time to demand the same gold-standard safety proof for vaccines that we demand for every pill we swallow.
2:12

"Never a Placebo-Controlled Group": How Our Children's Vaccines Were Licensed on a Foundation of Flimsy Science. We are told the vaccine schedule is the most tested and safest in medical history. But what if that claim collapses under the weight of the actual data? Attorney Aaron Siri delivers a stunning fact that should halt every parent and citizen in their tracks: "Almost all childhood vaccines were licensed based on trials in which safety was reviewed for days or weeks after injection, underpowered, not enough kids, and there was never a placebo-controlled group for a single of the routine childhood vaccines injected into children, not one of them." Let that sink in. Not one. The gold standard of scientific research—the placebo-controlled trial—was abandoned for the entire routine childhood vaccine schedule. Why the Double Standard? For prescription drugs, companies run years-long, placebo-controlled trials. Why? Not ethics—economics. They are liable for damages. A harmful drug means financial ruin. For vaccines, the incentive is perversely flipped. With liability removed, the corporate boardroom's bottom-line calculus is simple: do the absolute minimum required for licensure. The Hep B Example is Jaw-Dropping Proof. The Combovax HB vaccine, given to babies on their first day of life, was licensed based on a "trial" that: - Monitored safety for just FIVE DAYS. - Included only 147 children. - Had NO control group whatsoever. This isn't just inadequate; it's scientifically indefensible. The recent COVID vaccine trials, often criticized as rushed, were vastly more comprehensive than this. The Root Cause? The Liability Shield. There is no doubt: if vaccine manufacturers were financially liable for injuries, the safety science would be exhaustive. They would never risk their profits on such flimsy data. The absence of liability created an absence of scientific rigor. This isn't conspiracy. It's cold, hard corporate calculus, and our children are the ones living in the experiment. It's long past time to demand the same gold-standard safety proof for vaccines that we demand for every pill we swallow.

Camus

38,809 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Crémieux calls Trump and RFK Jr.'s overhaul of the American childhood vaccine schedule pure crankery with no science behind it: "There is nothing empirical about this. It's driven by a bunch of debunked claims." "They want to reduce the number of injections, but they want to split the MMR vaccine into three separate vaccines: one for measles, one for mumps, and one for rubella. This is arbitrary. They didn't supply any justification for it. They won't. They can't. It's just pure conspiracism." "It's impossible to maintain the claim that the hep vaccine leads to autism because when we introduce it, a large portion of people suddenly get it. And then there is no concomitant increase in the autism rate. Science just isn't penetrating this advice." "We are undergoing a measles epidemic that is going to get much worse because of what happened today. They are radical conspiracists with no data, and they are going to hurt a lot of kids." Crémieux
4:01

Crémieux calls Trump and RFK Jr.'s overhaul of the American childhood vaccine schedule pure crankery with no science behind it: "There is nothing empirical about this. It's driven by a bunch of debunked claims." "They want to reduce the number of injections, but they want to split the MMR vaccine into three separate vaccines: one for measles, one for mumps, and one for rubella. This is arbitrary. They didn't supply any justification for it. They won't. They can't. It's just pure conspiracism." "It's impossible to maintain the claim that the hep vaccine leads to autism because when we introduce it, a large portion of people suddenly get it. And then there is no concomitant increase in the autism rate. Science just isn't penetrating this advice." "We are undergoing a measles epidemic that is going to get much worse because of what happened today. They are radical conspiracists with no data, and they are going to hurt a lot of kids." Crémieux

MTS

84,981 görüntüleme • 13 gün önce

RFK Jr. summarizes a shocking case of scientific corruption at the CDC: "In 2002, the CDC conducted an internal study on children in Atlanta, GA. They compared kids who received the MMR vaccine on time (before 36 months) to those who received it later. The data revealed an undeniable and alarming fact: Black boys who received the vaccine on schedule had a 260% increased chance of an autism diagnosis. But the public never heard this. The lead scientist, Dr. William Thompson, was ordered by his CDC boss to enter a room with the other co-authors and destroy that specific data. They were commanded to bury the evidence. The study was then published, omitting this critical finding entirely. This isn't a conspiracy—it's a documented case of a senior official at a captured agency ordering the manipulation of science to serve a preferred narrative, regardless of the public health cost. This is the corruption we are ending."
1:56

RFK Jr. summarizes a shocking case of scientific corruption at the CDC: "In 2002, the CDC conducted an internal study on children in Atlanta, GA. They compared kids who received the MMR vaccine on time (before 36 months) to those who received it later. The data revealed an undeniable and alarming fact: Black boys who received the vaccine on schedule had a 260% increased chance of an autism diagnosis. But the public never heard this. The lead scientist, Dr. William Thompson, was ordered by his CDC boss to enter a room with the other co-authors and destroy that specific data. They were commanded to bury the evidence. The study was then published, omitting this critical finding entirely. This isn't a conspiracy—it's a documented case of a senior official at a captured agency ordering the manipulation of science to serve a preferred narrative, regardless of the public health cost. This is the corruption we are ending."

Camus

52,943 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

"For every one child that is saved from death from COVID-19, there are 30 child deaths associated with the COVID-19 vaccine." Dr. Brian Hooker testifies against lack of oversight on ALL vaccines. Study Comparing Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Children (2020): • Vaccinated children were found to be at least twice as likely to be diagnosed with developmental delays, ear infections, and gastrointestinal disorders. • Vaccinated children had a 4.5 times higher likelihood of an asthma diagnosis compared to unvaccinated children. Dr. Hooker revealed that the CDC possesses a Vaccine Safety Datalink with potential for comparative studies between vaccinated and unvaccinated children but refuses to allow independent researchers access or publish results from such data. Brian Hooker, PhD has submitted over 120 FOIA requests to the CDC to access the Vaccine Safety Datalink, all of which have been refused.
10:01

"For every one child that is saved from death from COVID-19, there are 30 child deaths associated with the COVID-19 vaccine." Dr. Brian Hooker testifies against lack of oversight on ALL vaccines. Study Comparing Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Children (2020): • Vaccinated children were found to be at least twice as likely to be diagnosed with developmental delays, ear infections, and gastrointestinal disorders. • Vaccinated children had a 4.5 times higher likelihood of an asthma diagnosis compared to unvaccinated children. Dr. Hooker revealed that the CDC possesses a Vaccine Safety Datalink with potential for comparative studies between vaccinated and unvaccinated children but refuses to allow independent researchers access or publish results from such data. Brian Hooker, PhD has submitted over 120 FOIA requests to the CDC to access the Vaccine Safety Datalink, all of which have been refused.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

578,261 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

🚨 RFK Jr. says he fired the CDC’s vaccine chief after discovering that for 7 months he was blocked from accessing key vaccine safety data. RFK Jr. also revealed this official delayed funding to Texas for measles response efforts. "I gave the order, I'm running this agency, how come nothing's happening?" "And then we tried to get the vaccine safety data language - the data that supposedly the CDC tries to use to make good decisions on whether vaccines are hurting people and whether there are side effects. For 7 MONTHS, he stonewalled us so that we could not get that data!" "He's also the individual that runs the VAERS system, which is the surveillance system for injuries that captures, according to CDC's own study, fewer than 1% of vaccine injuries. This is malpractice." "These people are the people who ordered our children to walk around in masks. They're the people who closed our schools. They're the people who imposed social distancing with no science, shut down our businesses, and they need to GO." "We need new blood, and we need new people who are committed to public health and integrity and gold standard science."
1:22

🚨 RFK Jr. says he fired the CDC’s vaccine chief after discovering that for 7 months he was blocked from accessing key vaccine safety data. RFK Jr. also revealed this official delayed funding to Texas for measles response efforts. "I gave the order, I'm running this agency, how come nothing's happening?" "And then we tried to get the vaccine safety data language - the data that supposedly the CDC tries to use to make good decisions on whether vaccines are hurting people and whether there are side effects. For 7 MONTHS, he stonewalled us so that we could not get that data!" "He's also the individual that runs the VAERS system, which is the surveillance system for injuries that captures, according to CDC's own study, fewer than 1% of vaccine injuries. This is malpractice." "These people are the people who ordered our children to walk around in masks. They're the people who closed our schools. They're the people who imposed social distancing with no science, shut down our businesses, and they need to GO." "We need new blood, and we need new people who are committed to public health and integrity and gold standard science."

MAHA Action

48,600 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

In a striking and damning assessment, attorney Aaron Siri dismantles the foundational claims of vaccine safety, asserting that the medical establishment's confidence is built on a hollow slogan, not solid science. Siri, who litigates vaccine cases, reveals that when he deposed typical pediatricians and infectious disease doctors, he found their knowledge severely lacking. They are, in his experience, "bad. They just don't know." He argues they are not trained on the specific clinical trials used to license vaccines and simply parrot a narrative they've been taught. He contends that the "incredible body of science" touted by medical organizations is "of no moment." The only thing that matters, he states, is the actual evidence from the original clinical trials themselves. And upon that examination, Siri claims the findings are "disturbing." He makes the explosive declaration that there is not a single routine childhood vaccine whose licensing was based on a clinical trial that affirmed its safety. This is not an opinion based on internet lists or crowdsourced data, but a conclusion drawn from meticulously analyzing the very studies the system itself relied upon. His work alleges a profound and systemic failure at the core of modern vaccination policy.
1:45

In a striking and damning assessment, attorney Aaron Siri dismantles the foundational claims of vaccine safety, asserting that the medical establishment's confidence is built on a hollow slogan, not solid science. Siri, who litigates vaccine cases, reveals that when he deposed typical pediatricians and infectious disease doctors, he found their knowledge severely lacking. They are, in his experience, "bad. They just don't know." He argues they are not trained on the specific clinical trials used to license vaccines and simply parrot a narrative they've been taught. He contends that the "incredible body of science" touted by medical organizations is "of no moment." The only thing that matters, he states, is the actual evidence from the original clinical trials themselves. And upon that examination, Siri claims the findings are "disturbing." He makes the explosive declaration that there is not a single routine childhood vaccine whose licensing was based on a clinical trial that affirmed its safety. This is not an opinion based on internet lists or crowdsourced data, but a conclusion drawn from meticulously analyzing the very studies the system itself relied upon. His work alleges a profound and systemic failure at the core of modern vaccination policy.

Camus

47,656 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

RFK Jr: “Trusting the experts is a feature of religion and totalitarian systems, not of democracy or science” “The biggest group of scientists right now in this country is working for the processed food industry. They’re designing foods that are designed to not fill you up, to leave you hungry. They’re designed to contain ingredients that are addictive, that drive you to get more and more, more sugar, more salt, or a lot of these artificial, synthetic chemicals. The whole thing is a lie. You’re not eating food, you’re eating… chemicals. The system has been utterly corrupted. We were all told during Covid to trust the experts, but that’s not a thing. Trusting the experts is not a feature of science, it’s the opposite of science.” If we’re gonna be a science-based country with science-based policies, which we pride ourselves on, if we’re gonna have a democracy, then we need to question everything.” From Robert Breedlove
2:57

RFK Jr: “Trusting the experts is a feature of religion and totalitarian systems, not of democracy or science” “The biggest group of scientists right now in this country is working for the processed food industry. They’re designing foods that are designed to not fill you up, to leave you hungry. They’re designed to contain ingredients that are addictive, that drive you to get more and more, more sugar, more salt, or a lot of these artificial, synthetic chemicals. The whole thing is a lie. You’re not eating food, you’re eating… chemicals. The system has been utterly corrupted. We were all told during Covid to trust the experts, but that’s not a thing. Trusting the experts is not a feature of science, it’s the opposite of science.” If we’re gonna be a science-based country with science-based policies, which we pride ourselves on, if we’re gonna have a democracy, then we need to question everything.” From Robert Breedlove

Holden Culotta

195,767 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Professor Jones, whose work sits at the center of the climate change modeling apparatus, stated plainly that he would not share his data even if the World Meteorological Organization requested it. His reasoning was that 25 years of work had gone into the research, and he saw no obligation to hand it over to people whose aim was to find something wrong with it. That statement is worth reading slowly, because it is a precise inversion of how science is supposed to work. The whole point of publishing a scientific claim is that other researchers can examine the underlying data, attempt to replicate the result, and either confirm or challenge the conclusion. That is not a hostile process. That is the process. Replication is the mechanism by which a scientific claim earns the right to be called scientific. When a researcher withholds the data behind conclusions that are being used to drive policy affecting hundreds of millions of people, the enterprise has left the domain of science and entered the domain of politics. The 25 years invested in the work is not a justification for withholding it. If anything, the scale of that investment makes independent scrutiny more important, not less. You do not get to claim scientific authority while simultaneously blocking the one process that confers it.
0:47

Professor Jones, whose work sits at the center of the climate change modeling apparatus, stated plainly that he would not share his data even if the World Meteorological Organization requested it. His reasoning was that 25 years of work had gone into the research, and he saw no obligation to hand it over to people whose aim was to find something wrong with it. That statement is worth reading slowly, because it is a precise inversion of how science is supposed to work. The whole point of publishing a scientific claim is that other researchers can examine the underlying data, attempt to replicate the result, and either confirm or challenge the conclusion. That is not a hostile process. That is the process. Replication is the mechanism by which a scientific claim earns the right to be called scientific. When a researcher withholds the data behind conclusions that are being used to drive policy affecting hundreds of millions of people, the enterprise has left the domain of science and entered the domain of politics. The 25 years invested in the work is not a justification for withholding it. If anything, the scale of that investment makes independent scrutiny more important, not less. You do not get to claim scientific authority while simultaneously blocking the one process that confers it.

Randall Carlson

25,234 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce