Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

TRUMP DOES NOT Back Down from his comments about the Seditious Democrats: —— “What happens to them, I can’t tell you, but they broke the law.” 👀 “If you look at sedition, a very strong form of being a traitor, I thought it was some kind of a comedy...

MJTruthUltra's profile picture

MJTruthUltra

598,828 subscribers

1,384,261 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Just FYI… sedition IS punishable by de*th. Trump:”I’m not threatening them, but I think they’re in serious trouble. I would say they’re in serious trouble — In the old days it was death. That’s as seditious behavior… These people broke the law, now what happens to them, I can’t tell you, but they broke the law.” They’re in DEEP SHlT!!!
0:24

Just FYI… sedition IS punishable by de*th. Trump:”I’m not threatening them, but I think they’re in serious trouble. I would say they’re in serious trouble — In the old days it was death. That’s as seditious behavior… These people broke the law, now what happens to them, I can’t tell you, but they broke the law.” They’re in DEEP SHlT!!!

SaltyGoat

34,296 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

🇺🇸 TRUMP: I’M NOT THREATENING DEATH… BUT THE SEDITIOUS DEMS ARE IN SERIOUS TROUBLE "If you look at sedition, that’s a very strong form of being a traitor. I must tell you, I heard it, and I thought it was some kind of comedy situation. I thought it was some kind of skit, because I couldn’t believe that they’d say it. And I watched Democrat congressmen and one Democrat senator yesterday on one of the shows. They didn’t even want to discuss it. They said, 'Whoa, don’t get me into that one.' I’ll tell you what. I don’t know about modern-day things, because modern-day is a lot softer, but in the old days, if you said a thing like that, that was punishable by death. I think they’re in serious trouble. I’m not threatening death, but I think they’re in serious trouble. In the old days, it was death. You know, nothing’s a big deal. Today’s a different world, okay? It’s a softer, meeker, milder world. But I will say this: I think what they did is really bad. The hatred is pretty strong." Source: Fox News
2:15

🇺🇸 TRUMP: I’M NOT THREATENING DEATH… BUT THE SEDITIOUS DEMS ARE IN SERIOUS TROUBLE "If you look at sedition, that’s a very strong form of being a traitor. I must tell you, I heard it, and I thought it was some kind of comedy situation. I thought it was some kind of skit, because I couldn’t believe that they’d say it. And I watched Democrat congressmen and one Democrat senator yesterday on one of the shows. They didn’t even want to discuss it. They said, 'Whoa, don’t get me into that one.' I’ll tell you what. I don’t know about modern-day things, because modern-day is a lot softer, but in the old days, if you said a thing like that, that was punishable by death. I think they’re in serious trouble. I’m not threatening death, but I think they’re in serious trouble. In the old days, it was death. You know, nothing’s a big deal. Today’s a different world, okay? It’s a softer, meeker, milder world. But I will say this: I think what they did is really bad. The hatred is pretty strong." Source: Fox News

Mario Nawfal

60,492 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

BREAKING: Trump just double-downed on his sedition claims against Democrats: “If you look at sedition. If you look at that type of… That’s a strong form of being a traitor… In the old days, if you said something like that, that was punishable by death… I’m not threatening them but I would say they are in serious trouble…”
2:15

BREAKING: Trump just double-downed on his sedition claims against Democrats: “If you look at sedition. If you look at that type of… That’s a strong form of being a traitor… In the old days, if you said something like that, that was punishable by death… I’m not threatening them but I would say they are in serious trouble…”

Ed Krassenstein

85,805 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Trump on threatening members of Congress: “I'm not threatening death, but I think they're in serious trouble. In the old days, it was death.”
2:35

Trump on threatening members of Congress: “I'm not threatening death, but I think they're in serious trouble. In the old days, it was death.”

The Bulwark

25,191 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Ohhhh boy… see where this is going? 👀 🚨 #BREAKING - President Trump says the U.S. Military Courts are looking into the Democrats Seditious Behavior Trump was asked if he worries there will be Military Personel who will disobey Direct Orders? “NO, I don’t worry about anything like that, because I’m a LEADER and they do as I say. But that was a traitorous thing to do. I think they’re very seriously broke the law. I think Pete Hegseth is looking into it too. I know they’re looking into it militarily…I don’t know for a fact, but I think the military is looking into it. The military courts.”
0:53

Ohhhh boy… see where this is going? 👀 🚨 #BREAKING - President Trump says the U.S. Military Courts are looking into the Democrats Seditious Behavior Trump was asked if he worries there will be Military Personel who will disobey Direct Orders? “NO, I don’t worry about anything like that, because I’m a LEADER and they do as I say. But that was a traitorous thing to do. I think they’re very seriously broke the law. I think Pete Hegseth is looking into it too. I know they’re looking into it militarily…I don’t know for a fact, but I think the military is looking into it. The military courts.”

MJTruthUltra

1,409,138 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

"I'm not threatening them, but I think they're in serious trouble," says President Donald J. Trump on Democrat Members of Congress encouraging members of the military to defy orders from their commander-in-chief. "These are people that, in my opinion, broke the law."
2:15

"I'm not threatening them, but I think they're in serious trouble," says President Donald J. Trump on Democrat Members of Congress encouraging members of the military to defy orders from their commander-in-chief. "These are people that, in my opinion, broke the law."

Rapid Response 47

323,431 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Ta-Nehisi Coates: “I think Charlie Kirk was a hatemonger. I take no joy in the killing of anyone no matter what they said. But if you ask me what the truth of his life was I would have to tell you it’s hate”
0:47

Ta-Nehisi Coates: “I think Charlie Kirk was a hatemonger. I take no joy in the killing of anyone no matter what they said. But if you ask me what the truth of his life was I would have to tell you it’s hate”

Marco Foster

4,672,264 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

❗️“The retransmitters in Belarus have not yet been dismantled. Yesterday, one of them was switched on, but I think they will no longer turn them on,” — Syrskyi said. When asked whether the Belarusians would not be physically able to do this, the Commander-in-Chief replied: “I can’t tell you everything. I think they will realize that they shouldn’t do it.“
0:20

❗️“The retransmitters in Belarus have not yet been dismantled. Yesterday, one of them was switched on, but I think they will no longer turn them on,” — Syrskyi said. When asked whether the Belarusians would not be physically able to do this, the Commander-in-Chief replied: “I can’t tell you everything. I think they will realize that they shouldn’t do it.“

🪖MilitaryNewsUA🇺🇦

79,573 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

WATCH: Very newsy exchange at the White House Tuesday afternoon between President Trump and CBS’s Ed O'Keefe about Iran, revealing the U.S. was gifted “a present” from whatever remains of the new/old Iranian regime that is “oil and gas related”.... President Trump: “Do you have another question? You haven’t been here in a while.” O’Keefe: “Well, on Iran, can you give us any more sense of who exactly in Iran it is, either Witkoff or Kushner you’re speaking with?” Trump: “Yeah. We had — I hate to say this in front of these young people — they’re not children. I spoke to most of them. They sound like adults to me. Even though they are sort of children, right? They’ll always be your children. But I hate to say it, but we killed all their leadership. And then they met to choose new leaders, and we killed all of them. And now, we have a new group and we can easily do that. But let’s see how they turn out. It’s — we have, really, regime change. You know, this is a change in the regime because the leaders are all very different than the ones that we started off with that created all those problems. So this was — I think we can say, Jason, this is regime change, right?” O’Keefe: “What makes you trust them?” Trump: “I don’t trust anybody. I don’t trust you. I mean, that’s only because I know you, but if I didn’t know you, I’d probably have more trust. But I don’t trust anyone.” O’Keefe: “Why bother talking to them?” Trump: “Why do you — why do you say that? Why do you say what makes you — do you think I trust them? I don’t trust them.” O’Keefe: “Then why bother talking to them?” Trump: “Because they’re going to make a deal. They’re going to make a deal. They did something yesterday that was amazing. Actually. They gave us a present. And the president arrived today and it was a very big present worth a tremendous amount of money. And I’m not going to tell you what that present is, but it was a very significant prize. And they gave it to us, and they said they were going to give it, so that meant one thing to me. We’re dealing with the right people —” O’Keefe: “Was it nuclear related.” Trump: “No, it wasn’t nuclear related. It was oil and gas related. And it was a very nice thing they did. But what it showed me is that we’re dealing with the right people because, you know, you don’t know because the leadership was killed, all gone. Khamenei, all gone. As the expression goes, the past Supreme Leader and then the new Supreme Leader was racked up at a minimum, racked up pretty good, and everyone else was gone. And then many of the people in the third tier are gone. But we’re dealing with a group of people that I think turn out and the — the present, the gift they made to us was very significant. And they said they were going to do it and it happened. And they’re the only ones that could have done it.”
2:36

WATCH: Very newsy exchange at the White House Tuesday afternoon between President Trump and CBS’s Ed O'Keefe about Iran, revealing the U.S. was gifted “a present” from whatever remains of the new/old Iranian regime that is “oil and gas related”.... President Trump: “Do you have another question? You haven’t been here in a while.” O’Keefe: “Well, on Iran, can you give us any more sense of who exactly in Iran it is, either Witkoff or Kushner you’re speaking with?” Trump: “Yeah. We had — I hate to say this in front of these young people — they’re not children. I spoke to most of them. They sound like adults to me. Even though they are sort of children, right? They’ll always be your children. But I hate to say it, but we killed all their leadership. And then they met to choose new leaders, and we killed all of them. And now, we have a new group and we can easily do that. But let’s see how they turn out. It’s — we have, really, regime change. You know, this is a change in the regime because the leaders are all very different than the ones that we started off with that created all those problems. So this was — I think we can say, Jason, this is regime change, right?” O’Keefe: “What makes you trust them?” Trump: “I don’t trust anybody. I don’t trust you. I mean, that’s only because I know you, but if I didn’t know you, I’d probably have more trust. But I don’t trust anyone.” O’Keefe: “Why bother talking to them?” Trump: “Why do you — why do you say that? Why do you say what makes you — do you think I trust them? I don’t trust them.” O’Keefe: “Then why bother talking to them?” Trump: “Because they’re going to make a deal. They’re going to make a deal. They did something yesterday that was amazing. Actually. They gave us a present. And the president arrived today and it was a very big present worth a tremendous amount of money. And I’m not going to tell you what that present is, but it was a very significant prize. And they gave it to us, and they said they were going to give it, so that meant one thing to me. We’re dealing with the right people —” O’Keefe: “Was it nuclear related.” Trump: “No, it wasn’t nuclear related. It was oil and gas related. And it was a very nice thing they did. But what it showed me is that we’re dealing with the right people because, you know, you don’t know because the leadership was killed, all gone. Khamenei, all gone. As the expression goes, the past Supreme Leader and then the new Supreme Leader was racked up at a minimum, racked up pretty good, and everyone else was gone. And then many of the people in the third tier are gone. But we’re dealing with a group of people that I think turn out and the — the present, the gift they made to us was very significant. And they said they were going to do it and it happened. And they’re the only ones that could have done it.”

Curtis Houck

108,556 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Rep. Chip Roy: "As someone who carries a weapon in Texas, if I'm in front of law enforcement or if I get stopped, I tell them that. I tell them that I've got a concealed carry permit. I show them my ID. I tell them where the weapon is because that's what we're supposed to do under the law in Texas .. that's not what I think I saw here"
2:44

Rep. Chip Roy: "As someone who carries a weapon in Texas, if I'm in front of law enforcement or if I get stopped, I tell them that. I tell them that I've got a concealed carry permit. I show them my ID. I tell them where the weapon is because that's what we're supposed to do under the law in Texas .. that's not what I think I saw here"

Aaron Rupar

557,996 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

"I like 'Kiss Me Deadly' (1955) very much. I just don't think it was as important a film as some people thought it was." --- Robert Aldrich Full Excerpt: "Interviewer: We all like 'Kiss Me Deadly' (1955), but hear that you don't. Aldrich: Oh no, that's not true. I like this one very much and I'm very proud of it. If you remember when it was made was the time all the New Wave directors were editors on Cahiers. And they read into it many more things than were intended. And I think it was Truffaut who asked me at Venice the following year if I wasn't proud and happy or something about the things that Cahiers had said about it. And I am a lot older and wiser now, and I suppose I should have said "Yes" and let it go at that. But I said something to the effect that I was very glad they said it, but I couldn't really take credit for all those rather deep and significant thoughts because they weren't all intended. I am glad that they were there; maybe some of them were subconscious, but I thought a lot of them were read in. And naturally, if you had been the author of this kind of thing, you would have felt a little bit cheated, and I think they did. I think they didn't resent it, but they felt a little hurt . . . No, I like the picture very much. I just don't think it was as important a film as some people thought it was." (Robert Aldrich's interview with Ian Cameron & Mark Shivas, 1963) P.S: On this day, 71 years ago "Kiss Me Deadly" (1955) premiered in New York City, USA.
1:14

"I like 'Kiss Me Deadly' (1955) very much. I just don't think it was as important a film as some people thought it was." --- Robert Aldrich Full Excerpt: "Interviewer: We all like 'Kiss Me Deadly' (1955), but hear that you don't. Aldrich: Oh no, that's not true. I like this one very much and I'm very proud of it. If you remember when it was made was the time all the New Wave directors were editors on Cahiers. And they read into it many more things than were intended. And I think it was Truffaut who asked me at Venice the following year if I wasn't proud and happy or something about the things that Cahiers had said about it. And I am a lot older and wiser now, and I suppose I should have said "Yes" and let it go at that. But I said something to the effect that I was very glad they said it, but I couldn't really take credit for all those rather deep and significant thoughts because they weren't all intended. I am glad that they were there; maybe some of them were subconscious, but I thought a lot of them were read in. And naturally, if you had been the author of this kind of thing, you would have felt a little bit cheated, and I think they did. I think they didn't resent it, but they felt a little hurt . . . No, I like the picture very much. I just don't think it was as important a film as some people thought it was." (Robert Aldrich's interview with Ian Cameron & Mark Shivas, 1963) P.S: On this day, 71 years ago "Kiss Me Deadly" (1955) premiered in New York City, USA.

DepressedBergman

16,770 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Billy Wilder explains how the commercial failure of "Ace in the Hole" (1951) changed his view about the audience: "Wilder: 'Ace in the Hole' (1951) was a very peculiar thing. I was very fond of the picture—I got wonderful, wonderful reactions to it from more serious people. But for some reason or other, people did not want to see that grim a picture, that boasted the guy in the hole there, and the reporter, Mr. Kirk Douglas. It was very somber. It was one of my most somber pictures. And they did not believe me that when somebody’s a newspaperman, they are capable of that behavior. Interviewer: Very much ahead of its time. Wilder: [Shrugs.] Yeah. Interviewer: In this current age of tabloid culture, 'Ace in the Hole' has never felt more up-to-the-minute. Is it amusing to you, how this film has held up? Wilder: Yeah, that’s very funny, I must say. It was a complete failure. It was just... I don’t know. I just changed my mind about the audience. I just think that if you do something very fine, that they will get to the core of the thing, what it’s about, what it’s really about. But they never, at the time, they never gave it a chance. Somebody in an editorial, I think, in Life magazine said that “Mr. Wilder should be deported.” I felt that I was not with it anymore. That I wrote against the audience, the people who paid, in those days, a dollar fifty, two dollars. They felt robbed. They wanted to be entertained, entertained in a serious way, but not too serious a way. I don’t know. Then again, they did go for 'Double Indemnity' (1944). You can never, never, never predict an audience’s reaction. You never know how it’s going to affect them. But I hear about 'Ace in the Hole' quite a bit these days." ("Conversations with Wilder", Cameron Crowe, 1999) P.S: On this day, 75 years ago, "Ace in the Hole" (1951) premiered in Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
1:07

Billy Wilder explains how the commercial failure of "Ace in the Hole" (1951) changed his view about the audience: "Wilder: 'Ace in the Hole' (1951) was a very peculiar thing. I was very fond of the picture—I got wonderful, wonderful reactions to it from more serious people. But for some reason or other, people did not want to see that grim a picture, that boasted the guy in the hole there, and the reporter, Mr. Kirk Douglas. It was very somber. It was one of my most somber pictures. And they did not believe me that when somebody’s a newspaperman, they are capable of that behavior. Interviewer: Very much ahead of its time. Wilder: [Shrugs.] Yeah. Interviewer: In this current age of tabloid culture, 'Ace in the Hole' has never felt more up-to-the-minute. Is it amusing to you, how this film has held up? Wilder: Yeah, that’s very funny, I must say. It was a complete failure. It was just... I don’t know. I just changed my mind about the audience. I just think that if you do something very fine, that they will get to the core of the thing, what it’s about, what it’s really about. But they never, at the time, they never gave it a chance. Somebody in an editorial, I think, in Life magazine said that “Mr. Wilder should be deported.” I felt that I was not with it anymore. That I wrote against the audience, the people who paid, in those days, a dollar fifty, two dollars. They felt robbed. They wanted to be entertained, entertained in a serious way, but not too serious a way. I don’t know. Then again, they did go for 'Double Indemnity' (1944). You can never, never, never predict an audience’s reaction. You never know how it’s going to affect them. But I hear about 'Ace in the Hole' quite a bit these days." ("Conversations with Wilder", Cameron Crowe, 1999) P.S: On this day, 75 years ago, "Ace in the Hole" (1951) premiered in Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.

DepressedBergman

41,140 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

AOC: I also find the freakout around it pretty funny as well. I’m not gonna lie. A commentator that was like, “What she’s doing is peddling the dangerous lie that women can have it all.” Can you believe that? What I find funny is that my choice is a threat to them. Despite the rhetoric they use and the bald eagles that they plaster all over the place, they actually really do not believe in a free country. You do not need anyone’s approval to lead your life and make the choices that make you happy. They talk about being pro-family, but all of a sudden when a 36-year-old talks about having a baby, they’re mad. How many male members of Congress are they freaking out about having kids after 40? The president had his last kid at 59. Life happens. And people say you’re peddling this dangerous lie that women can have it all. You know, maybe in life you can’t have everything, but here’s the secret: You can have a hell of a lot. And I am very grateful for my life. I go after what I want, but maybe that’s what they don’t like either. Too bad for them.
2:32

AOC: I also find the freakout around it pretty funny as well. I’m not gonna lie. A commentator that was like, “What she’s doing is peddling the dangerous lie that women can have it all.” Can you believe that? What I find funny is that my choice is a threat to them. Despite the rhetoric they use and the bald eagles that they plaster all over the place, they actually really do not believe in a free country. You do not need anyone’s approval to lead your life and make the choices that make you happy. They talk about being pro-family, but all of a sudden when a 36-year-old talks about having a baby, they’re mad. How many male members of Congress are they freaking out about having kids after 40? The president had his last kid at 59. Life happens. And people say you’re peddling this dangerous lie that women can have it all. You know, maybe in life you can’t have everything, but here’s the secret: You can have a hell of a lot. And I am very grateful for my life. I go after what I want, but maybe that’s what they don’t like either. Too bad for them.

Acyn

963,961 просмотров • 17 дней назад

“Ya know, I was asked, your wife’s family broke the law, what do you think of that? And I said, well I’m so grateful that they did because if they didn’t have the courage to take that step I wouldn’t have the 3 beautiful children that I have today.”
0:23

“Ya know, I was asked, your wife’s family broke the law, what do you think of that? And I said, well I’m so grateful that they did because if they didn’t have the courage to take that step I wouldn’t have the 3 beautiful children that I have today.”

Annie Wu (all socials: @annie_wu_22)

596,005 просмотров • 1 год назад

Reporter: “We saw the bruising on your hand. Are you okay?” President Trump: “I’m very good. I clipped it on the table. So I put a little—what do they call it—cream on it. But I clipped it. I would say take aspirin if you like your heart, but don’t take aspirin if you don’t want to have a little bruising.” “I take the big aspirin. And when you take the big aspirin, they tell you that you bruise. The doctors said, ‘You don’t have to take that, sir. You’'re very healthy.’ I said, ‘I’m not taking any chances.’ That’s one of the side effectseffects. of taking aspirin.”
0:38

Reporter: “We saw the bruising on your hand. Are you okay?” President Trump: “I’m very good. I clipped it on the table. So I put a little—what do they call it—cream on it. But I clipped it. I would say take aspirin if you like your heart, but don’t take aspirin if you don’t want to have a little bruising.” “I take the big aspirin. And when you take the big aspirin, they tell you that you bruise. The doctors said, ‘You don’t have to take that, sir. You’'re very healthy.’ I said, ‘I’m not taking any chances.’ That’s one of the side effectseffects. of taking aspirin.”

RedWave Press

5,144,142 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Bill Maher reveals he accepted an invitation to appear in a documentary about Charlie Kirk. He then dropped a surprising take on the late conservative leader that’s going to upset a lot of his liberal fans. MAHER: “By the way, they’re doing a documentary and they asked if I would be in it.” “They said...the other people they said are in it already are all hard right-wingers.” “I said, yes, I’m giving them five minutes after my taping Friday night because...and I told them, don’t expect me to be just saying, you know, hagiography about Charlie.” “I liked him as a person, I’m glad I talked to him.” “I do not think he was a monster and if you look at...his statements, I’ve read the full statements.” “Of course, because everybody is only interested in getting points for their team, they mischaracterized them.” “But even when I read the full statement, which were accurately characterized, I still disagreed with them but it wasn’t what they presented.” “Again, it’s always in the middle.” “It wasn’t as bad as they said, but I still disagreed.” “My little motto here is, everybody’s a monster till you talk to them.”
1:19

Bill Maher reveals he accepted an invitation to appear in a documentary about Charlie Kirk. He then dropped a surprising take on the late conservative leader that’s going to upset a lot of his liberal fans. MAHER: “By the way, they’re doing a documentary and they asked if I would be in it.” “They said...the other people they said are in it already are all hard right-wingers.” “I said, yes, I’m giving them five minutes after my taping Friday night because...and I told them, don’t expect me to be just saying, you know, hagiography about Charlie.” “I liked him as a person, I’m glad I talked to him.” “I do not think he was a monster and if you look at...his statements, I’ve read the full statements.” “Of course, because everybody is only interested in getting points for their team, they mischaracterized them.” “But even when I read the full statement, which were accurately characterized, I still disagreed with them but it wasn’t what they presented.” “Again, it’s always in the middle.” “It wasn’t as bad as they said, but I still disagreed.” “My little motto here is, everybody’s a monster till you talk to them.”

Overton

673,646 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

I had a case recently at the airport. I park illegally and they came to lock my car. I told them other cars were guilty as well so why lock my own car. I even told them it is me Obi but they they didn’t give me preferential treatment. - peter Obi In other words, you broke the law, but were expecting preferential treatment because you are above the law or because others broke the law too. Is this the law and order you preach Oga?
0:51

I had a case recently at the airport. I park illegally and they came to lock my car. I told them other cars were guilty as well so why lock my own car. I even told them it is me Obi but they they didn’t give me preferential treatment. - peter Obi In other words, you broke the law, but were expecting preferential treatment because you are above the law or because others broke the law too. Is this the law and order you preach Oga?

Osas

14,512 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

.Daily Caller’s Reagan Reese: “Your Director of National Counterterrorism, Joe Kent — he just resigned today. He said he can’t support your conflict with Iran. What’s your reaction to that? And did you —” President Trump: “Well, I read his statement. I always thought it was a nice guy, but I always thought he was weak on security, very weak on security. I didn’t know him well, but I thought he seemed like a pretty nice guy, but when I read a statement, I realized that it’s a good thing that he’s out because he said that Iran was not a threat. Iran was a threat — every country realized what a threat Iran was. The question is whether or not they wanted to do something about it. And many people, many of the greatest military scholars are saying for years that presidents should have taken out Iran because they wanted a nuclear weapon. They were — if we didn’t do the attack or if I’ll go a step further, if I didn’t terminate the Iran nuclear deal given to us, one of the worst deals ever made by Barack Hussein Obama. Remember when they sent Boeing 757 over there loaded with cash, hundreds of millions of dollars? You would have been very happy. This was a wonderful — they sent hundreds of million — people forget that. Does anybody remember, right? You remember! Hundreds of millions of dollars in a Boeing 757. I think they had two of them loaded. They took the seats out and they put cash. And it was so much that there wasn’t a bank in Virginia, Maryland, or DC that had any money left. They stripped them of all their money, put it into planes, sent it to Iran almost as ransom. That’s not going to happen with Trump. And nobody ever did anything about it. Nobody ever said anything. Can you imagine if I did that? So, they’ve been a threat for a long time, but they’ve really been a threat. If — if I didn’t terminate Obama’s horrible deal that he made, the Iran nuclear deal, you would have had a nuclear war four years ago. You would have had — you would have had nuclear holocaust, and you would have had it again if we didn’t bomb the site. So, when somebody is working with us that says they didn’t think Iran was a threat, we don’t want those people because — and there are some people, I guess, that would say that, but they’re not smart people or they’re not savvy people. Iran was a tremendous threat. And virtually every NATO nation — and this is the thing, if they told me it wasn’t a threat and therefore they don’t want to help, but when they say it was a threat and it was a major threat — every one of them — I think every one of them — I don’t know of one that said they’re not a threat, but when they say it was a threat, but we’re not going to help, I think they’re very foolish. You know, it’s interesting. It’s interesting because I could say this, that what’s happening in Ukraine, we’re probably in there for $400 billion. We don’t spend any money anymore. They buy it from us and they pay full price. But Biden gave them between 350 and $400 billion of equipment and cash. Someday, they’ll have to find out about the cash, and you could say that wasn’t a threat. You know, we’re helping them, so we helped them and they didn’t help us. And I think that’s a very bad thing for NATO.”
3:25

.Daily Caller’s Reagan Reese: “Your Director of National Counterterrorism, Joe Kent — he just resigned today. He said he can’t support your conflict with Iran. What’s your reaction to that? And did you —” President Trump: “Well, I read his statement. I always thought it was a nice guy, but I always thought he was weak on security, very weak on security. I didn’t know him well, but I thought he seemed like a pretty nice guy, but when I read a statement, I realized that it’s a good thing that he’s out because he said that Iran was not a threat. Iran was a threat — every country realized what a threat Iran was. The question is whether or not they wanted to do something about it. And many people, many of the greatest military scholars are saying for years that presidents should have taken out Iran because they wanted a nuclear weapon. They were — if we didn’t do the attack or if I’ll go a step further, if I didn’t terminate the Iran nuclear deal given to us, one of the worst deals ever made by Barack Hussein Obama. Remember when they sent Boeing 757 over there loaded with cash, hundreds of millions of dollars? You would have been very happy. This was a wonderful — they sent hundreds of million — people forget that. Does anybody remember, right? You remember! Hundreds of millions of dollars in a Boeing 757. I think they had two of them loaded. They took the seats out and they put cash. And it was so much that there wasn’t a bank in Virginia, Maryland, or DC that had any money left. They stripped them of all their money, put it into planes, sent it to Iran almost as ransom. That’s not going to happen with Trump. And nobody ever did anything about it. Nobody ever said anything. Can you imagine if I did that? So, they’ve been a threat for a long time, but they’ve really been a threat. If — if I didn’t terminate Obama’s horrible deal that he made, the Iran nuclear deal, you would have had a nuclear war four years ago. You would have had — you would have had nuclear holocaust, and you would have had it again if we didn’t bomb the site. So, when somebody is working with us that says they didn’t think Iran was a threat, we don’t want those people because — and there are some people, I guess, that would say that, but they’re not smart people or they’re not savvy people. Iran was a tremendous threat. And virtually every NATO nation — and this is the thing, if they told me it wasn’t a threat and therefore they don’t want to help, but when they say it was a threat and it was a major threat — every one of them — I think every one of them — I don’t know of one that said they’re not a threat, but when they say it was a threat, but we’re not going to help, I think they’re very foolish. You know, it’s interesting. It’s interesting because I could say this, that what’s happening in Ukraine, we’re probably in there for $400 billion. We don’t spend any money anymore. They buy it from us and they pay full price. But Biden gave them between 350 and $400 billion of equipment and cash. Someday, they’ll have to find out about the cash, and you could say that wasn’t a threat. You know, we’re helping them, so we helped them and they didn’t help us. And I think that’s a very bad thing for NATO.”

Curtis Houck

12,646 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨 TRUMP: “I have the best plan of all but I’m not going to tell you. They want me to say ‘I’m going to attack at 9:47 in the morning and bla bla,’ and if you don’t do that they say you don’t have a plan. Everybody here knows what the plan is. I don’t mind being insulted, I’ve been insulted for many years by the fake media. But you have three great people here, they have a plan. Every single thing has been thought out by all of us, but I can’t just reveal the plan to the media.”
0:54

🚨 TRUMP: “I have the best plan of all but I’m not going to tell you. They want me to say ‘I’m going to attack at 9:47 in the morning and bla bla,’ and if you don’t do that they say you don’t have a plan. Everybody here knows what the plan is. I don’t mind being insulted, I’ve been insulted for many years by the fake media. But you have three great people here, they have a plan. Every single thing has been thought out by all of us, but I can’t just reveal the plan to the media.”

Autism Capital 🧩

806,815 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Bill Maher DEFENDS Charlie Kirk after actor David Cross tried to paint him as racist. Maher refused to let Cross run away with the narrative. MAHER: “But like the the the rank and file Republican, I don’t think is a racist.” “I think you can get them into positions that look racist, but I don’t think in their bones they’re like what the racists kind of what I grew up was like a racist was somebody who didn’t want to shake a black person’s hand.” CROSS: “Yes...I don’t think that’s a thing, but I think there is...I mean I know there is because they say as much.” “There’s a feeling, a sense that...uh...I mean like Charlie Kirk stuff that women and black people and black women especially are just not...” “I’m not being an a**hole guys, I’m just saying they don’t have the mental, you know...” MAHER: “There was a little more [to it].” “I read that when he died, of course lots of places put his greatest hits...worst hits, worst things.” “And then somebody else printed something and this is what always happens with the media like I never trust it because you never get the full story, where like each one was put in with the full context.” “It was never quite as bad as they said.” CROSS: “I mean, context is everything, right?” MAHER: “It is. I’m just saying it was easy to pull from his quote bed and find stuff that I certainly don’t agree with even in the context, but it wasn’t quite what...it wasn’t quite what you were saying there.”
1:33

Bill Maher DEFENDS Charlie Kirk after actor David Cross tried to paint him as racist. Maher refused to let Cross run away with the narrative. MAHER: “But like the the the rank and file Republican, I don’t think is a racist.” “I think you can get them into positions that look racist, but I don’t think in their bones they’re like what the racists kind of what I grew up was like a racist was somebody who didn’t want to shake a black person’s hand.” CROSS: “Yes...I don’t think that’s a thing, but I think there is...I mean I know there is because they say as much.” “There’s a feeling, a sense that...uh...I mean like Charlie Kirk stuff that women and black people and black women especially are just not...” “I’m not being an a**hole guys, I’m just saying they don’t have the mental, you know...” MAHER: “There was a little more [to it].” “I read that when he died, of course lots of places put his greatest hits...worst hits, worst things.” “And then somebody else printed something and this is what always happens with the media like I never trust it because you never get the full story, where like each one was put in with the full context.” “It was never quite as bad as they said.” CROSS: “I mean, context is everything, right?” MAHER: “It is. I’m just saying it was easy to pull from his quote bed and find stuff that I certainly don’t agree with even in the context, but it wasn’t quite what...it wasn’t quite what you were saying there.”

Overton

405,217 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад