Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Tucker Carlson asks Kim Dotcom whether any encrypted messaging app is actually secure. Dotcom claims that Signal is the worst one, because the US government holds a backdoor and is laughing about it. This is, of course, completely untrue: Signal has been served with grand jury subpoenas and search... show more

Max 📟

79,455 subscribers

14,237 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨 KIM DOTCOM: “SIGNAL IS NOT SECURE — ALL THE TOOLS ARE BEING WATCHED” This is a disturbing warning from Kim Dotcom in his interview with Tucker Carlson. Carlson asks a simple question: are any of the communications apps millions of people rely upon — Signal, WhatsApp, iMessage — actually secure? Dotcom's answer is unequivocal: “No.” He goes much further, claiming that Signal is compromised by a US government “back door” and that people discussing genuinely sensitive information are wrong to believe their conversations cannot be accessed. Then comes perhaps the most chilling part of the exchange. Carlson asks whether someone attempting to organise resistance to tyranny could communicate securely. Dotcom replies: “You can't... because all the tools are being watched.” That is an extraordinary allegation. It needs evidence — particularly the specific claim of a government back door in Signal — but the wider question deserves serious scrutiny. How private are our supposedly private communications, and who ultimately has the ability to access them? Tucker Carlson Kim Dotcom

🚨 KIM DOTCOM: “SIGNAL IS NOT SECURE — ALL THE TOOLS ARE BEING WATCHED” This is a disturbing warning from Kim Dotcom in his interview with Tucker Carlson. Carlson asks a simple question: are any of the communications apps millions of people rely upon — Signal, WhatsApp, iMessage — actually secure? Dotcom's answer is unequivocal: “No.” He goes much further, claiming that Signal is compromised by a US government “back door” and that people discussing genuinely sensitive information are wrong to believe their conversations cannot be accessed. Then comes perhaps the most chilling part of the exchange. Carlson asks whether someone attempting to organise resistance to tyranny could communicate securely. Dotcom replies: “You can't... because all the tools are being watched.” That is an extraordinary allegation. It needs evidence — particularly the specific claim of a government back door in Signal — but the wider question deserves serious scrutiny. How private are our supposedly private communications, and who ultimately has the ability to access them? Tucker Carlson Kim Dotcom

Jim Ferguson

125,725 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

🚨 KIM DOTCOM: “IT IS ILLEGAL IN THE UNITED STATES TO COMMUNICATE PRIVATELY” This is an extraordinary exchange between Tucker Carlson and Kim Dotcom. Tucker asks a very simple question: Why hasn't someone built a communications device that is genuinely private — one that government cannot access? Dotcom's answer is chilling. He claims that if you create a truly encrypted communications system in the United States, the government can compel you to provide access — and potentially imprison you if you refuse. His conclusion: “It is illegal in the United States to communicate privately.” Think about the implications of that statement. In an age when virtually our entire lives pass through digital communications, how much privacy do we actually have? And should any government have the power to demand a backdoor into supposedly private communications? This is a debate every free society should be having. Tucker Carlson Kim Dotcom

🚨 KIM DOTCOM: “IT IS ILLEGAL IN THE UNITED STATES TO COMMUNICATE PRIVATELY” This is an extraordinary exchange between Tucker Carlson and Kim Dotcom. Tucker asks a very simple question: Why hasn't someone built a communications device that is genuinely private — one that government cannot access? Dotcom's answer is chilling. He claims that if you create a truly encrypted communications system in the United States, the government can compel you to provide access — and potentially imprison you if you refuse. His conclusion: “It is illegal in the United States to communicate privately.” Think about the implications of that statement. In an age when virtually our entire lives pass through digital communications, how much privacy do we actually have? And should any government have the power to demand a backdoor into supposedly private communications? This is a debate every free society should be having. Tucker Carlson Kim Dotcom

Jim Ferguson

245,391 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

🚨 KIM DOTCOM: “EVERYTHING THAT FOLLOWED IS BECAUSE OF MY SUPPORT FOR THE TRUTH.” Kim Dotcom makes an explosive allegation in his interview with Tucker Carlson. He says that after WikiLeaks released the “Collateral Murder” video, he was so affected by what he saw that he donated substantial sums to WikiLeaks. Then, he says, everything changed. Dotcom claims the copyright case subsequently brought against him was retaliation for his financial support of Julian Assange and WikiLeaks. Tucker immediately spots the wider question: If a website owner is criminally responsible for what users upload, why wouldn't the same principle apply to Facebook, Google and every other major platform? Dotcom's answer is chilling: “The big difference is they did not give money to WikiLeaks or Julian Assange.” If Dotcom is right about the motive, this wasn't simply a copyright battle. It was punishment for supporting WikiLeaks. Watch this exchange. Tucker Carlson Kim Dotcom

🚨 KIM DOTCOM: “EVERYTHING THAT FOLLOWED IS BECAUSE OF MY SUPPORT FOR THE TRUTH.” Kim Dotcom makes an explosive allegation in his interview with Tucker Carlson. He says that after WikiLeaks released the “Collateral Murder” video, he was so affected by what he saw that he donated substantial sums to WikiLeaks. Then, he says, everything changed. Dotcom claims the copyright case subsequently brought against him was retaliation for his financial support of Julian Assange and WikiLeaks. Tucker immediately spots the wider question: If a website owner is criminally responsible for what users upload, why wouldn't the same principle apply to Facebook, Google and every other major platform? Dotcom's answer is chilling: “The big difference is they did not give money to WikiLeaks or Julian Assange.” If Dotcom is right about the motive, this wasn't simply a copyright battle. It was punishment for supporting WikiLeaks. Watch this exchange. Tucker Carlson Kim Dotcom

Jim Ferguson

19,021 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen

🚨KIM DOTCOM IS A LEGEND 🚨Watch: ENJOY 🚨TUCKER: How is the war in Ukraine resolved? What does that look like? 🚨KIM DOTCOM: On, it looks like now on the battlefield, you know. So Russia will win against Ukraine, and, I don't think there will be a settlement. No. 🚨TUCKER: Do you believe that NATO will continue to attack Russia? KIM DOTCOM: I think, the attacks on Russia will continue for many years. I don't see the US and, Europe giving up. So, I think what Russia has to prepare for is a bigger war. TUCKER: A bigger war with United... directly with the United States and Europe? KIM DOTCOM: With Europe, yeah. TUCKER: You think that this will evolve or devolve into a direct conflict between NATO and Russia where Russia is hitting Europe, Europe is hitting Russia? KIM DOTCOM: Yeah. I think so. TUCKER: And who wins? KIM DOTCOM: Russia, of course, because Europe has no, armies. You know, NATO is a toothless tiger. Yeah. TUCKER: Why would the Western powers, why would NATO want a war with Russia? I've never understood that. KIM DOTCOM: Their alternative is the US loses, and if the US loses, it will go down. You know, the West has invested a lot in, US. So all the debt is,owned by debtors. Europe is a big debtor to the United States. So if the US stock markets, for example, all the European companies that are go down, all the European companies that are listed in the US are also going down. So we, we are talking about a loss of maybe trillions, you know. It's not something that the West, can do. They want to, prevent the US from going under. TUCKER: I think, I understand that, and I'd like to see the US not go under also, but I think they're accelerating the destruction of the United States. This is having the opposite effect. If you wanted to wreck the US and bring the empire to its knees in the most humiliating, painful, expensive way, this is what you would do. KIM DOTCOM: Yeah, but, the debt has now reached levels that are unsustainable. So it's just a matter of time. You know, to run the US government costs 20 billion a day. It's impossible. TUCKER: It's impossible. That's right.

🚨KIM DOTCOM IS A LEGEND 🚨Watch: ENJOY 🚨TUCKER: How is the war in Ukraine resolved? What does that look like? 🚨KIM DOTCOM: On, it looks like now on the battlefield, you know. So Russia will win against Ukraine, and, I don't think there will be a settlement. No. 🚨TUCKER: Do you believe that NATO will continue to attack Russia? KIM DOTCOM: I think, the attacks on Russia will continue for many years. I don't see the US and, Europe giving up. So, I think what Russia has to prepare for is a bigger war. TUCKER: A bigger war with United... directly with the United States and Europe? KIM DOTCOM: With Europe, yeah. TUCKER: You think that this will evolve or devolve into a direct conflict between NATO and Russia where Russia is hitting Europe, Europe is hitting Russia? KIM DOTCOM: Yeah. I think so. TUCKER: And who wins? KIM DOTCOM: Russia, of course, because Europe has no, armies. You know, NATO is a toothless tiger. Yeah. TUCKER: Why would the Western powers, why would NATO want a war with Russia? I've never understood that. KIM DOTCOM: Their alternative is the US loses, and if the US loses, it will go down. You know, the West has invested a lot in, US. So all the debt is,owned by debtors. Europe is a big debtor to the United States. So if the US stock markets, for example, all the European companies that are go down, all the European companies that are listed in the US are also going down. So we, we are talking about a loss of maybe trillions, you know. It's not something that the West, can do. They want to, prevent the US from going under. TUCKER: I think, I understand that, and I'd like to see the US not go under also, but I think they're accelerating the destruction of the United States. This is having the opposite effect. If you wanted to wreck the US and bring the empire to its knees in the most humiliating, painful, expensive way, this is what you would do. KIM DOTCOM: Yeah, but, the debt has now reached levels that are unsustainable. So it's just a matter of time. You know, to run the US government costs 20 billion a day. It's impossible. TUCKER: It's impossible. That's right.

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

318,882 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE - Saturday 8th of August 2026 Kim Dotcom promotes Freedom Party and Direct Democracy policy on Tucker Carlson In an interview released overnight, Kim Dotcom spoke to Tucker Carlson about surveillance and direct democracy and his support for the Freedom Party ‘freedom’ in New Zealand. Kim Dotcom currently under threat of extradition from New Zealand due to his support of Julian Assange and Wikileaks as well as the Megaupload, spoke to Tucker Carlson about freedom of speech, mass surveillance and how the only way to stop the global descent into a complete surveillance state is through a system of governance known as Direct Democracy. Direct Democracy is a fundamental shift in how our society is governed. It makes the people the highest authority in a democracy, so the Government exists to serve the people, not rule over them. Dropping the blockbuster endorsement live on Tucker Carlson’s vast media network to an audience of tens of millions worldwide, Dotcom has thrown his weight behind Freedom Party to ensure a once in a lifetime opportunity for a fundamental shift in how our society is governed. This global backing comes as Dotcom continues his high-profile fight against a political globalist-agenda driven extradition battle that has dragged on for over 14 years. Freedom Party recognizes Dotcom’s struggle against a massive and powerful corporate lobby that has control over governments, intelligence and surveillance agencies and the justice system. Dotcom has only been able to fight these forces and expose the corruption because he can afford it, but normal kiwis are also affected by powerful corporations and government overreach but don’t have the finances to fight for their rights. Freedom Party says it’s time to turn this around! Prime Minister Christopher Luxon talks about changing from the MMP political system because he dislikes sharing power, we believe that direct democracy should be THE ONLY choice of governance for New Zealand. This would be a revolutionary shift for the entire political system from the ground up, giving civilians power over the government and FREEDOM from government abuse of human rights and fundamental freedoms. ‘freedom’ currently has an urgent application in the High Court against the Electoral Commission’s refusal to allow a name and logo change, from NZ Outdoors & Freedom Party to simply ‘freedom’. The case is being heard on Tuesday 18th August in the High Court at Wellington. ‘freedom’ invites all New Zealanders who believe in fairness, local decision making and genuine public participation to join us in building a system where the people lead and hold the power, and politicians serve as the administrators of the people's will. Visit our site to find more www.freedom.kiwiSee the FULL interview here FB YOUTUBE X #nzpol #directdemocracy #freedom #peoplepower

freedom

63,637 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen

The war in Ukraine is a danger to the US TUCKER: [war mongering Europe] is accelerating the destruction of the United States. If you wanted to wreck the US and bring the empire to its knees in the most humiliating, painful, expensive way, this is what you would do. KIM DOTCOM: Yeah, but, the debt has now reached levels that are unsustainable. So it's just a matter of time. You know, to run the US government costs 20 billion a day. It's impossible. TUCKER: It's impossible. That's right.

The war in Ukraine is a danger to the US TUCKER: [war mongering Europe] is accelerating the destruction of the United States. If you wanted to wreck the US and bring the empire to its knees in the most humiliating, painful, expensive way, this is what you would do. KIM DOTCOM: Yeah, but, the debt has now reached levels that are unsustainable. So it's just a matter of time. You know, to run the US government costs 20 billion a day. It's impossible. TUCKER: It's impossible. That's right.

Alternative News

32,509 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen

Tim Pool and his fellow hosts actually think the Suez Canal is in Israel, and that is the main reason the US supports Israel and why it is a good argument to keep supporting it. The Suez Canal is in Egypt which has had a pro-US puppet regime for decades, and the only times it has been closed, including right now as one of the hosts points out, is exactly because of US support for Israel

Tim Pool and his fellow hosts actually think the Suez Canal is in Israel, and that is the main reason the US supports Israel and why it is a good argument to keep supporting it. The Suez Canal is in Egypt which has had a pro-US puppet regime for decades, and the only times it has been closed, including right now as one of the hosts points out, is exactly because of US support for Israel

☀️👀

313,816 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

2025 marks the 80th anniversary of the victory in WWII and Russia is celebrating it just as it has been doing every year since 1945. Meanwhile, the West can barely remember the date, tears down monuments to its own soldiers, and lectures us about being uncivilized.

2025 marks the 80th anniversary of the victory in WWII and Russia is celebrating it just as it has been doing every year since 1945. Meanwhile, the West can barely remember the date, tears down monuments to its own soldiers, and lectures us about being uncivilized.

Rina Lu🇷🇺

25,273 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

SUPERCUT: Kim Dotcom tells Tucker Carlson everything that is going to happen in the world. Conveniently, every point is completely aligned with state propaganda from Russia, China, and Iran. 0:00 Ukraine is lost, Iran is lost, the United States goes into a depression, Russia wins 0:29 Iran wins too, because the United States has no weapons and no army to invade 0:35 Electronic voting machines can be manipulated, and someone is waiting for the right time to use them 0:49 Donald Trump is the biggest liar in the world 1:04 The deep state would lose 40% of its budget without Russia and China as enemies 1:17 He personally will die in a nuclear holocaust

SUPERCUT: Kim Dotcom tells Tucker Carlson everything that is going to happen in the world. Conveniently, every point is completely aligned with state propaganda from Russia, China, and Iran. 0:00 Ukraine is lost, Iran is lost, the United States goes into a depression, Russia wins 0:29 Iran wins too, because the United States has no weapons and no army to invade 0:35 Electronic voting machines can be manipulated, and someone is waiting for the right time to use them 0:49 Donald Trump is the biggest liar in the world 1:04 The deep state would lose 40% of its budget without Russia and China as enemies 1:17 He personally will die in a nuclear holocaust

Max 📟

11,297 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

Last night’s attack was one of the largest Russian ballistic missile attacks to date. Kyiv and the Kyiv region were the Russians’ primary target. They had been preparing this attack for several days, stockpiling missiles. The threat, of course, remains even now, and this must be taken into account. Russia is placing its wagers on ballistic missiles, and it is because of them that Putin still believes in his war. It is very important that our partners understand what is happening and that air defense missiles are needed to protect lives literally every single day. It is important to accelerate everything – both with our European partners and with the United States.

Last night’s attack was one of the largest Russian ballistic missile attacks to date. Kyiv and the Kyiv region were the Russians’ primary target. They had been preparing this attack for several days, stockpiling missiles. The threat, of course, remains even now, and this must be taken into account. Russia is placing its wagers on ballistic missiles, and it is because of them that Putin still believes in his war. It is very important that our partners understand what is happening and that air defense missiles are needed to protect lives literally every single day. It is important to accelerate everything – both with our European partners and with the United States.

Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський

498,184 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

James Talarico says, “I say all of this in context of abortion because before God comes over Mary, and we have the incarnation, God asks for Mary’s consent, which is remarkable. The angel comes down and asks Mary if this is something she wants to do and she says, ‘If it is God’s will, let it be done. Let it happen.’ So, to me, that is an affirmation in one of our most central stories that creation has to be done with consent.” His rendering of that story is completely untrue. Gabriel doesn’t actually ask for Mary’s permission there. She simply ascends to what God has already decided and already chosen. She’s not actually consenting to that. Using the incarnation of Christ to defend abortion is a complete distortion of scripture.

James Talarico says, “I say all of this in context of abortion because before God comes over Mary, and we have the incarnation, God asks for Mary’s consent, which is remarkable. The angel comes down and asks Mary if this is something she wants to do and she says, ‘If it is God’s will, let it be done. Let it happen.’ So, to me, that is an affirmation in one of our most central stories that creation has to be done with consent.” His rendering of that story is completely untrue. Gabriel doesn’t actually ask for Mary’s permission there. She simply ascends to what God has already decided and already chosen. She’s not actually consenting to that. Using the incarnation of Christ to defend abortion is a complete distortion of scripture.

Allie Beth Stuckey

141,740 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Snyder: Putin's real soft spot is his conviction that Russia has a thousand-year history in which it and Ukraine 'have always been together'. Meaning Ukraine never truly existed as its own country, and any idea to the contrary is just his enemies' conspiracy. 1/

Snyder: Putin's real soft spot is his conviction that Russia has a thousand-year history in which it and Ukraine 'have always been together'. Meaning Ukraine never truly existed as its own country, and any idea to the contrary is just his enemies' conspiracy. 1/

Tymofiy Mylovanov

66,591 Aufrufe • vor 20 Tagen

Phiagate, explained in horse terms You go from HorseReviews dotcom over to ClydesdalesDirect dotcom. You have Phia installed as an extension. You buy a stunning Clydesdale from the website using its online shopping features, knowing that this particular horse breed — large and powerful, with an arched neck, high withers, and a sloped shoulder — is perfect for your use case after HorseReviews educated you on all this. You don't notice anything, but Phia was part of the transaction. It inserted an attribution code into the transaction process without you knowing, allowing it to collect the commission ClydesdalesDirect pays out to businesses that refer customers to them and effectively stealing that commission from HorseReviews dotcom, which actually referred you. HorseReviews dotcom likely paid Google to advertise its site so that ultimately they could collect this commission. Phia did nothing but replace HorseReviews' affiliate code with its own. That's basically what the Bloomberg story alleges.

Phiagate, explained in horse terms You go from HorseReviews dotcom over to ClydesdalesDirect dotcom. You have Phia installed as an extension. You buy a stunning Clydesdale from the website using its online shopping features, knowing that this particular horse breed — large and powerful, with an arched neck, high withers, and a sloped shoulder — is perfect for your use case after HorseReviews educated you on all this. You don't notice anything, but Phia was part of the transaction. It inserted an attribution code into the transaction process without you knowing, allowing it to collect the commission ClydesdalesDirect pays out to businesses that refer customers to them and effectively stealing that commission from HorseReviews dotcom, which actually referred you. HorseReviews dotcom likely paid Google to advertise its site so that ultimately they could collect this commission. Phia did nothing but replace HorseReviews' affiliate code with its own. That's basically what the Bloomberg story alleges.

TBPN

179,784 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

BREAKING: Last night Anderson Cooper completely destroyed Tucker Carlson. He said: "The idea of Tucker Carlson being in that mob that day and not wetting his pants is hard to imagine. I find it hard to understand somebody who has never put himself in harm's way in any capacity for anyone else, or in reporting a story, yet has the audacity to rewrite history. That’s what this is, it is an attempt to rewrite history in what is certainly one of the biggest events in American democracy.” Thank you Anderson Cooper!

BREAKING: Last night Anderson Cooper completely destroyed Tucker Carlson. He said: "The idea of Tucker Carlson being in that mob that day and not wetting his pants is hard to imagine. I find it hard to understand somebody who has never put himself in harm's way in any capacity for anyone else, or in reporting a story, yet has the audacity to rewrite history. That’s what this is, it is an attempt to rewrite history in what is certainly one of the biggest events in American democracy.” Thank you Anderson Cooper!

Ed Krassenstein

4,205,208 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

Alan Oppenheim, MIT professor: "Jump Trading pays quants $650K to pull one real signal out of market noise. I wrote the textbook on that exact math and taught it for free." this free MIT lecture is the math the whole "quant edge" is built on, and almost nobody selling you a course will name it. the man teaching it wrote the signal-processing textbook every engineer on earth learned from, and he put the lectures online for nothing. here is the idea. a price chart is a signal buried in noise. most of what you see is random static, and hidden inside is a faint, repeating pattern with real mathematics for pulling it out. that is not a metaphor. jim simons was a codebreaker who did exactly this to enemy transmissions, then pointed the same math at the market and made a hundred billion dollars. none of it is new. oppenheim taught this in 1987, the math is older, and every lecture is free. same story i told in the article above. the edge was never a secret formula. it was knowing a market is a noisy signal, and having the tools to read it. here is what the gurus skip. the math to separate signal from noise is free and everyone has it. the edge is cleaner data than the next desk, and the discipline to trust a faint signal across thousands of trades instead of chasing the static. the filter is free. the patience to use it is not.

Alan Oppenheim, MIT professor: "Jump Trading pays quants $650K to pull one real signal out of market noise. I wrote the textbook on that exact math and taught it for free." this free MIT lecture is the math the whole "quant edge" is built on, and almost nobody selling you a course will name it. the man teaching it wrote the signal-processing textbook every engineer on earth learned from, and he put the lectures online for nothing. here is the idea. a price chart is a signal buried in noise. most of what you see is random static, and hidden inside is a faint, repeating pattern with real mathematics for pulling it out. that is not a metaphor. jim simons was a codebreaker who did exactly this to enemy transmissions, then pointed the same math at the market and made a hundred billion dollars. none of it is new. oppenheim taught this in 1987, the math is older, and every lecture is free. same story i told in the article above. the edge was never a secret formula. it was knowing a market is a noisy signal, and having the tools to read it. here is what the gurus skip. the math to separate signal from noise is free and everyone has it. the edge is cleaner data than the next desk, and the discipline to trust a faint signal across thousands of trades instead of chasing the static. the filter is free. the patience to use it is not.

Rossst.03

281,905 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

“This guy has been asking me to go on a date with him for weeks and I finally honored his invite. How would you bring a woman out on a date and you’re telling me to pay the bill because it went pass your budget? Is it my fault that the bill is 500k?” — Lady cries out.

“This guy has been asking me to go on a date with him for weeks and I finally honored his invite. How would you bring a woman out on a date and you’re telling me to pay the bill because it went pass your budget? Is it my fault that the bill is 500k?” — Lady cries out.

𝐀𝐬𝐚𝐤𝐲𝐆𝐑𝐍

240,728 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Tucker Carlson: “Qatar is a lot better for the United States than Israel has been— A LOT BETTER!” He urges his audience to visit Qatar to see it for themselves, claims there’s a lot of “falseness” about it, and says it can be a true ally to the US.

Tucker Carlson: “Qatar is a lot better for the United States than Israel has been— A LOT BETTER!” He urges his audience to visit Qatar to see it for themselves, claims there’s a lot of “falseness” about it, and says it can be a true ally to the US.

Justin

52,572 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen

The war against Israel has never been about land and borders. It has been about the existence of a non-Islamic state. Israel is the test the West should use to determine whether Islam is a threat to it: If Islam accepts Israel, then Islam can accept the West as it is. As long as Islam rejects Israel, it remains a threat to the West. Mamdani rejects Israel because of his Islam. Mamdani does not accept America, and he is not an American.

The war against Israel has never been about land and borders. It has been about the existence of a non-Islamic state. Israel is the test the West should use to determine whether Islam is a threat to it: If Islam accepts Israel, then Islam can accept the West as it is. As long as Islam rejects Israel, it remains a threat to the West. Mamdani rejects Israel because of his Islam. Mamdani does not accept America, and he is not an American.

Dan Burmawi

48,094 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen