正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Tucker Carlson publicly admitted he was wrong for once saying “the problem is Islam” and said he’s ashamed of framing an entire religion around the actions of extremists. His broader point was that mass hysteria and political fear can push societies into collective blame — whether against Muslims, Jews,...

58,489 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Dick Carlson, Tucker's dad, loved Israel. I should know. I was with him in Israel for 10 straight days. Every bus ride, every tour, every meal. At Yad Vashem, I'll never forget what he said: "Thank God the Jews have Israel." Dick Carlson knew that Jews have faced unique threats throughout history, and that Israel was necessary to protect Jews everywhere. I know that because he told me that. Not long after we returned from Israel, I started working for FDD, where he was already. We would have lunch every month or two for years. I can say without reservation that when it comes to Israel and the Jews, Tucker Carlson is no Dick Carlson. Dick Carlson supported Israel. Dick Carlson hated Hamas. Dick Carlson called "Radical Islam" an "enemy of the United States and of the West." Dick Carlson didn't question the patriotism of Jews who supported Israel. Dick Carlson didn't hate Christians who supported Israel, not least because he was one of them. Dick Carlson didn't insist that Jews needed to take DNA tests to prove that they're actually Jews. Dick Carlson never slandered "Zionists" by saying that they "don't care about America" or accused them of having "not much of a soul." Dick Carlson, in fact, rarely used the word "Zionist," even though he worked with many of them. And, of course, he was a Zionist himself. How did Dick Carlson describe the Jewish state? "Israel is a country under siege. And it's a democracy in a part of the world where there are no democracies." If you're looking for a north star to help you understand Israel and the Muslim world, you could do a lot worse than the late, great Dick Carlson. Like, for instance, his son Tucker.

Joel Mowbray

2,217,976 次观看 • 4 个月前

Tucker Carlson Blasphemed the Charlie Kirk Memorial and Blood Libeled Jews and an Entire Stadium CHEERED!!! There has been a battle waging behind the scenes among patriotic American Jews and Zionist Jews who loved Charlie Kirk and loved his debates. Our debate was, “should we criticize Charlie Kirk for platforming Jew and Israel haters like Tucker Carlson even though Charlie is one of the staunchest Zionists in America?” Apparently that debate itself was getting to Charlie and—if the reports are true—he took anybody questioning his decision to platform Tucker Carlson as an attack on free speech. I get the sentiment. However, it wasn’t and it’s not an attack on free speech to say, “beware that guy!” Tucker Carlson has his OWN massive platform and for Charlie Kirk to give him literal top billing next to him on TPUSA and AmFest events, tells American Jews, “we here at this organization think it’s fine to lie about Jews, Israel, and even Christians in Israel. And we don’t care that we’re helping spread that message at a time when Jew hatred is at its zenith.” NOBODY is saying Tucker Carlson can’t speak. We’re saying, “why are you making it seem like his attitude and philosophy is something worth emulating for the TPUSA contingent? One of the youngest cohorts in the political discourse?” I’d have the EXACT problem if Charlie Kirk decided to platform Louis Farrakhan or David Duke. That’s because both men preach ideas that are antithetical to American values… as does Tucker Carlson. Tucker Carlson isn’t just bad for Jews… Tucker Carlson is bad for America! And now Tucker Carlson is a hop, skip, and a jump away from the White House. I can taste that bile in the back of my throat like I did too many fireball shots at a tailgate: It’s the JD Vance/Tucker Carlson ticket. And Charlie Kirk helped that. That’s why I didn’t shut up about his decision to platform Tucker Carlson… and with more eyes on him than ever, Tucker Carlson got an ENTIRE stadium to cheer for the oldest of blood libels as millions more watched online and X rejoiced. If you think that’s cool, fine. It’s not. But you can think that way. You’re entitled to your opinion, and you’re entitled to be wrong. Do you think the online crusade going on in my other video is a sign of a healthy America? Or an America that is becoming more and more intolerant to Jews and more antagonistic towards the founding philosophies of this great nation and the philosophies that made this nation great? That’s why Charlie Kirk was wrong and needed to be called out. That doesn’t mean Charlie Kirk was a bad person or anything resembling it. CHARLIE KIRK WAS A GREAT MAN AND A GREAT AMERICAN… but he was a man. He was flawed. We all make mistakes (me more than most). Platforming Tucker Carlson and giving him top billing was and is a mistake. A mistake that can be rectified. But can those who hold Charlie Kirk’s legacy in their hands do anything about it? Do they want to? Those are the questions… For now? Well… we be Jews שנה טובה ומתוקה וגמר חתימה טובה ✍️🍯

Jake Donnelly

75,787 次观看 • 9 个月前

On his Charlie Kirk special, Tucker Carlson on Charlie, Israel, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Tucker makes a point of noting that what he shares is backed up by text-messages and that Charlie shared these thoughts with many people. “I was shocked and sickened by the ghoulish and really repulsive reaction of…Benjamin Netanyahu to Charlie’s death… basically made it all about him and all about his country, immediately trying to take the energy, the sadness, the grief, and redirect it towards support for whatever project he’s involved in.” “I don’t think I’ve seen anything lower than [Netanyahu’s] his attempt to hijack Charlie’s memory and use it for his own political ends, particularly since what he said was untrue.” “Charlie didn’t hate Jews. He loved Jews… He loved the state of Israel… He did not like Bibi Netanyahu. He said that to me many times. He said to people around him many times, he felt that Bibi Netanyahu was a very destructive force.” “He was appalled by what was happening in Gaza. He… believed Netanyahu was using the United States to prosecute his wars for the benefit of his country, and that it was shameful and embarrassing and bad for the United States.” Tucker says that Charlie urged him to speak his mind at a Turning Point Conference about Israel. Tucker says that some Pro-Israel donors to Turning Point USA “tormented” Charlie until “the day he died.” “Two days before he died, he lost a $2 million donation because he had publicly pledged to bring me to the next Turning Point conference in December.” Tucker also slams the American Jewish Committee (AJC) for referring to Charlie as an antisemite just two months ago.

Yashar Ali 🐘

517,714 次观看 • 10 个月前

Rahm Emanuel Came to Israel to Feed the Alligator There used to be a familiar tradition in American politics. If you were preparing to run for president, you came to Israel. You stood beside Israeli leaders. You spoke about the unbreakable alliance between the United States and Israel. You reminded Americans that Israel was America's closest democratic ally in the Middle East. You met Jewish leaders, reassured pro-Israel voters and donors, and returned home having demonstrated that supporting Israel was both morally right and strategically wise. That was the old Democratic Party. Today's Democratic Party is rapidly becoming something very different. Its loudest voices no longer celebrate the U.S.-Israel alliance. They question Israel's legitimacy. Many refuse to visit Israel altogether. Increasingly, the party's energy comes from an activist coalition that views Israel not as an ally, but as the embodiment of Western oppression. This coalition has become extraordinarily effective. It does not merely argue. It intimidates. It does not seek debate. It seeks ideological conformity. Those who refuse are branded racists, colonialists, fascists, or supporters of genocide. Careers are threatened. Institutions retreat. Politicians learn that silence—or worse, agreement—is often the safest political option. The result is that a vocal minority increasingly dictates the boundaries of acceptable opinion. Rahm Emanuel belongs to a different political generation. He comes from the old Democratic establishment. He understands the historic alliance between America and Israel. He understands why Israel matters strategically. He understands the history of Palestinian rejectionism. In his own speech, he acknowledged October 7, acknowledged Hamas' atrocities, and admitted that Israel repeatedly offered peace only to receive terrorism in return. None of that was new. What was new was what came next. Instead of coming to Israel to strengthen the alliance, Emanuel came to lecture Israel. He accused Israel of becoming a diplomatic liability. He warned that unconditional American support must end. He proposed sanctions against Israeli citizens, Israeli officials, companies, and banks connected to settlements. He argued that Israel had become isolated because of its own choices. It sounded less like a speech to Israelis than a campaign message directed at an entirely different audience. That audience was not sitting in the room. It was watching from American campuses, activist organizations, progressive media outlets, and the increasingly influential ideological wing of today's Democratic Party. Israelis do not vote in American elections. The people Emanuel was trying to persuade do. The speech was not really about convincing Israelis. It was about demonstrating to an increasingly anti-Israel political base that he is willing to confront Israel publicly. In other words, he came to Israel to feed the alligator. There is an old saying: When you feed an alligator, you hope it eats you last. That has become the strategy of far too many establishment politicians. Rather than confronting ideological extremism, they accommodate it. Rather than defending long-held principles, they move the line a little further each time, hoping today's concession will prevent tomorrow's attack. History suggests otherwise. The activist coalition that increasingly dominates parts of the Democratic conversation is driven by ideological purity. Every concession becomes the starting point for the next demand. Yesterday's ally becomes today's target for failing the newest ideological test. Rahm Emanuel appears to believe he can stand in both worlds. He can come to Israel, maintain relationships with the pro-Israel establishment, reassure traditional supporters of the alliance, and then deliver a speech harsh enough to convince the activist left that he is one of them. That is an extraordinarily risky political calculation.

Mossad Commentary

36,439 次观看 • 7 天前

🚨EXCLUSIVE FOOTAGE: Tucker Carlson’s lies unmasked after he is seen HUGGING Israeli Airport staff member and posing for photo-despite claiming he was ‘detained’ and ‘hauled’ off by security. Carlson appeared in great spirits while getting the celebrity treatment in Tel Aviv’s Ben Gurion Airport VIP lounge- even posing for the photo with a staff member. The fired Fox News host had claimed he was detained upon arrival in the country for an interview with U.S. Ambassador Mike Huckabee; and called it a “bizarre” experience. “Men who identified themselves as airport security took our passports, hauled our executive producer into a side room and then demanded to know what we spoke to Ambassador Huckabee about.” The new footage, obtained exclusively by Oli London, shows the complete opposite and exposes his false narrative that he spread in an attempt to smear Israel. Carlson also said he had to flee the country immediately afterwards- claims which have also been proven false. A spokesperson from the U.S. embassy in Israel also denied that Carlson was detained. “It is not accurate that Israel only was going to let Tucker into the country for the interview.” Carlson also did not leave the vicinity of the airport despite being offered by various groups, including Christians to visit different part of the country. His refusal to actually visit parts of Israel and meet with different communities has exposed Carlson for his extreme anti-Israel bias for social media clicks. The latest incident has drawn a further spotlight on Tucker Carlson’s increasingly unhinged views, smears against the Middle East’s only democracy and his praise for countries like Russia and Qatar.

Oli London

1,294,292 次观看 • 4 个月前

Dinesh D’Souza Sounds the Alarm on Tucker Carlson “The old Tucker ... would never have described Hamas not as a terrorist group but as a legitimate “political movement." ~ Dinesh D'Souza Conservative author and filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza told Eric Metaxas that Tucker Carlson’s behavior over the past several months reveals “something much larger is going on” and represents a dramatic departure from the commentator he once was. D’Souza pointed to a series of statements that he said the “old Tucker” would never have made: praising Sharia law as having “some good social benefits,” describing Hamas not as a terrorist group but as a legitimate “political movement,” and even coming to the defense of Nicolás Maduro, whom he called “the socialist narco-dictator of Venezuela.” “All of this is so unexpected that something larger is afoot,” D’Souza continued, linking Carlson’s recent controversy surrounding white nationalist Nick Fuentes to the same broader pattern. He argued that non-Jewish conservative Christians like himself and Metaxas pose a particular problem for Carlson’s narrative. “Tucker would love to have it be Tucker and Candace against Ben Shapiro and Mark Levin because then he gets to say, ‘Look, it’s the Jews I’m going up against,’” D’Souza explained. “But we are very awkward for him because we’re Christians. We’ve done a lot of work in history and apologetics. We actually know what we’re talking about. So we’re a great embarrassment to the theological and political absurdities that have been put out by Mr. Tucker Carlson.”

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

32,286 次观看 • 7 个月前

They call it Islam, then they call it radical Islam, then they call it political Islam, then they call it Islamism! The name changing will never stop because the problem fundamentally is ISLAM! A Muslim believes in Islam and therefore a Muslim is an Islamist! Because it’s in the name Islam-ist, and to claim it is not Islam but radical Islam is philosophically shallow, historically naive, factually stupid and intellectually dishonest. It’s not radical Islam, because Islam by nature is a very very radical religion. Not all Muslims are terrorists, but most If not all terrorists are Muslim. Just in Australia, Muslims compromise 3.5% of the population, yet they contribute to 95% of terrorists attacks & convictions. Can you imagine what will happen if they get to 5% or 20% or even more? Islam is a tyrannical political ideology that pretends to be a religion! Islam is a one world order violent political system that pretends to be spiritual enlightenment!Never ever trust a Christian or Conservative influencer including Tucker Qatarson Tucker Carlson & Crazy Candy Candace Owens when they claim to be speaking, proclaiming and fighting for THE TRUTH, while they never dare to confront and tackle the biggest evil and destructive force of our time to Christianity and the world, which is Islam. Islam has been violently, aggressively and militantly targeted and conquered Christian nations for the last 1400 years and now it’s going after the Christian West across Europe, America, Australia and whatever Christian world that is left in the modern world. What team are you on and are you awake yet? 👀🇮🇱🕋✝️

Andrew Sedra

10,673 次观看 • 2 个月前