Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Tucker Carlson publicly admitted he was wrong for once saying “the problem is Islam” and said he’s ashamed of framing an entire religion around the actions of extremists. His broader point was that mass hysteria and political fear can push societies into collective blame — whether against Muslims, Jews,...

58,489 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Dick Carlson, Tucker's dad, loved Israel. I should know. I was with him in Israel for 10 straight days. Every bus ride, every tour, every meal. At Yad Vashem, I'll never forget what he said: "Thank God the Jews have Israel." Dick Carlson knew that Jews have faced unique threats throughout history, and that Israel was necessary to protect Jews everywhere. I know that because he told me that. Not long after we returned from Israel, I started working for FDD, where he was already. We would have lunch every month or two for years. I can say without reservation that when it comes to Israel and the Jews, Tucker Carlson is no Dick Carlson. Dick Carlson supported Israel. Dick Carlson hated Hamas. Dick Carlson called "Radical Islam" an "enemy of the United States and of the West." Dick Carlson didn't question the patriotism of Jews who supported Israel. Dick Carlson didn't hate Christians who supported Israel, not least because he was one of them. Dick Carlson didn't insist that Jews needed to take DNA tests to prove that they're actually Jews. Dick Carlson never slandered "Zionists" by saying that they "don't care about America" or accused them of having "not much of a soul." Dick Carlson, in fact, rarely used the word "Zionist," even though he worked with many of them. And, of course, he was a Zionist himself. How did Dick Carlson describe the Jewish state? "Israel is a country under siege. And it's a democracy in a part of the world where there are no democracies." If you're looking for a north star to help you understand Israel and the Muslim world, you could do a lot worse than the late, great Dick Carlson. Like, for instance, his son Tucker.

Joel Mowbray

2,224,600 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Tucker Carlson Blasphemed the Charlie Kirk Memorial and Blood Libeled Jews and an Entire Stadium CHEERED!!! There has been a battle waging behind the scenes among patriotic American Jews and Zionist Jews who loved Charlie Kirk and loved his debates. Our debate was, “should we criticize Charlie Kirk for platforming Jew and Israel haters like Tucker Carlson even though Charlie is one of the staunchest Zionists in America?” Apparently that debate itself was getting to Charlie and—if the reports are true—he took anybody questioning his decision to platform Tucker Carlson as an attack on free speech. I get the sentiment. However, it wasn’t and it’s not an attack on free speech to say, “beware that guy!” Tucker Carlson has his OWN massive platform and for Charlie Kirk to give him literal top billing next to him on TPUSA and AmFest events, tells American Jews, “we here at this organization think it’s fine to lie about Jews, Israel, and even Christians in Israel. And we don’t care that we’re helping spread that message at a time when Jew hatred is at its zenith.” NOBODY is saying Tucker Carlson can’t speak. We’re saying, “why are you making it seem like his attitude and philosophy is something worth emulating for the TPUSA contingent? One of the youngest cohorts in the political discourse?” I’d have the EXACT problem if Charlie Kirk decided to platform Louis Farrakhan or David Duke. That’s because both men preach ideas that are antithetical to American values… as does Tucker Carlson. Tucker Carlson isn’t just bad for Jews… Tucker Carlson is bad for America! And now Tucker Carlson is a hop, skip, and a jump away from the White House. I can taste that bile in the back of my throat like I did too many fireball shots at a tailgate: It’s the JD Vance/Tucker Carlson ticket. And Charlie Kirk helped that. That’s why I didn’t shut up about his decision to platform Tucker Carlson… and with more eyes on him than ever, Tucker Carlson got an ENTIRE stadium to cheer for the oldest of blood libels as millions more watched online and X rejoiced. If you think that’s cool, fine. It’s not. But you can think that way. You’re entitled to your opinion, and you’re entitled to be wrong. Do you think the online crusade going on in my other video is a sign of a healthy America? Or an America that is becoming more and more intolerant to Jews and more antagonistic towards the founding philosophies of this great nation and the philosophies that made this nation great? That’s why Charlie Kirk was wrong and needed to be called out. That doesn’t mean Charlie Kirk was a bad person or anything resembling it. CHARLIE KIRK WAS A GREAT MAN AND A GREAT AMERICAN… but he was a man. He was flawed. We all make mistakes (me more than most). Platforming Tucker Carlson and giving him top billing was and is a mistake. A mistake that can be rectified. But can those who hold Charlie Kirk’s legacy in their hands do anything about it? Do they want to? Those are the questions… For now? Well… we be Jews שנה טובה ומתוקה וגמר חתימה טובה ✍️🍯

Jake Donnelly

75,787 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Rahm Emanuel Came to Israel to Feed the Alligator There used to be a familiar tradition in American politics. If you were preparing to run for president, you came to Israel. You stood beside Israeli leaders. You spoke about the unbreakable alliance between the United States and Israel. You reminded Americans that Israel was America's closest democratic ally in the Middle East. You met Jewish leaders, reassured pro-Israel voters and donors, and returned home having demonstrated that supporting Israel was both morally right and strategically wise. That was the old Democratic Party. Today's Democratic Party is rapidly becoming something very different. Its loudest voices no longer celebrate the U.S.-Israel alliance. They question Israel's legitimacy. Many refuse to visit Israel altogether. Increasingly, the party's energy comes from an activist coalition that views Israel not as an ally, but as the embodiment of Western oppression. This coalition has become extraordinarily effective. It does not merely argue. It intimidates. It does not seek debate. It seeks ideological conformity. Those who refuse are branded racists, colonialists, fascists, or supporters of genocide. Careers are threatened. Institutions retreat. Politicians learn that silence—or worse, agreement—is often the safest political option. The result is that a vocal minority increasingly dictates the boundaries of acceptable opinion. Rahm Emanuel belongs to a different political generation. He comes from the old Democratic establishment. He understands the historic alliance between America and Israel. He understands why Israel matters strategically. He understands the history of Palestinian rejectionism. In his own speech, he acknowledged October 7, acknowledged Hamas' atrocities, and admitted that Israel repeatedly offered peace only to receive terrorism in return. None of that was new. What was new was what came next. Instead of coming to Israel to strengthen the alliance, Emanuel came to lecture Israel. He accused Israel of becoming a diplomatic liability. He warned that unconditional American support must end. He proposed sanctions against Israeli citizens, Israeli officials, companies, and banks connected to settlements. He argued that Israel had become isolated because of its own choices. It sounded less like a speech to Israelis than a campaign message directed at an entirely different audience. That audience was not sitting in the room. It was watching from American campuses, activist organizations, progressive media outlets, and the increasingly influential ideological wing of today's Democratic Party. Israelis do not vote in American elections. The people Emanuel was trying to persuade do. The speech was not really about convincing Israelis. It was about demonstrating to an increasingly anti-Israel political base that he is willing to confront Israel publicly. In other words, he came to Israel to feed the alligator. There is an old saying: When you feed an alligator, you hope it eats you last. That has become the strategy of far too many establishment politicians. Rather than confronting ideological extremism, they accommodate it. Rather than defending long-held principles, they move the line a little further each time, hoping today's concession will prevent tomorrow's attack. History suggests otherwise. The activist coalition that increasingly dominates parts of the Democratic conversation is driven by ideological purity. Every concession becomes the starting point for the next demand. Yesterday's ally becomes today's target for failing the newest ideological test. Rahm Emanuel appears to believe he can stand in both worlds. He can come to Israel, maintain relationships with the pro-Israel establishment, reassure traditional supporters of the alliance, and then deliver a speech harsh enough to convince the activist left that he is one of them. That is an extraordinarily risky political calculation.

Mossad Commentary

36,673 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨EXCLUSIVE FOOTAGE: Tucker Carlson’s lies unmasked after he is seen HUGGING Israeli Airport staff member and posing for photo-despite claiming he was ‘detained’ and ‘hauled’ off by security. Carlson appeared in great spirits while getting the celebrity treatment in Tel Aviv’s Ben Gurion Airport VIP lounge- even posing for the photo with a staff member. The fired Fox News host had claimed he was detained upon arrival in the country for an interview with U.S. Ambassador Mike Huckabee; and called it a “bizarre” experience. “Men who identified themselves as airport security took our passports, hauled our executive producer into a side room and then demanded to know what we spoke to Ambassador Huckabee about.” The new footage, obtained exclusively by Oli London, shows the complete opposite and exposes his false narrative that he spread in an attempt to smear Israel. Carlson also said he had to flee the country immediately afterwards- claims which have also been proven false. A spokesperson from the U.S. embassy in Israel also denied that Carlson was detained. “It is not accurate that Israel only was going to let Tucker into the country for the interview.” Carlson also did not leave the vicinity of the airport despite being offered by various groups, including Christians to visit different part of the country. His refusal to actually visit parts of Israel and meet with different communities has exposed Carlson for his extreme anti-Israel bias for social media clicks. The latest incident has drawn a further spotlight on Tucker Carlson’s increasingly unhinged views, smears against the Middle East’s only democracy and his praise for countries like Russia and Qatar.

Oli London

1,298,274 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten